Skip to main content
Download PDF

Atovaquone and quinine anti-malarials inhibit ATP binding cassette transporter activity

Malaria Journal volume 13, Article number: 359 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Therapeutic blood plasma concentrations of anti-malarial drugs are essential for successful treatment. Pharmacokinetics of pharmaceutical compounds are dependent of adsorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. ATP binding cassette (ABC) transport proteins are particularly involved in drug deposition, as they are located at membranes of many uptake and excretory organs and at protective barriers, where they export endogenous and xenobiotic compounds, including pharmaceuticals. In this study, a panel of well-established anti-malarial drugs which may affect drug plasma concentrations was tested for interactions with human ABC transport proteins.

Methods

The interaction of chloroquine, quinine, artemisinin, mefloquine, lumefantrine, atovaquone, dihydroartemisinin and proguanil, with transport activity of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), bile salt export pump (BSEP) and multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRP) 1–4 were analysed. The effect of the anti-malarials on the ATP-dependent uptake of radio-labelled substrates was measured in membrane vesicles isolated from HEK293 cells overexpressing the ABC transport proteins.

Results

A strong and previously undescribed inhibition of BCRP-mediated transport by atovaquone with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.23 μM (95% CI 0.17-0.29 μM) and inhibition of P-gp-mediated transport by quinine with an IC50 of 6.8 μM (95% CI 5.9-7.8 μM) was observed. Furthermore, chloroquine and mefloquine were found to significantly inhibit P-gp-mediated transport. BCRP transport activity was significantly inhibited by all anti-malarials tested, whereas BSEP-mediated transport was not inhibited by any of the compounds. Both MRP1- and MRP3-mediated transport were significantly inhibited by mefloquine.

Conclusions

Atovaquone and quinine significantly inhibit BCRP- and P-gp- mediated transport at concentrations within the clinically relevant prophylactic and therapeutic range. Co-administration of these established anti-malarials with drugs that are BCRP or P-gp substrates may potentially lead to drug-drug interactions.

Background

ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters are membrane-bound proteins that allocate a wide variety of compounds at the expense of ATP, even against steep concentration gradients [1]. P-glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1), bile salt export pump (BSEP/ABCB11), multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRP1-4/ABCC1-4), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) are among the most important drug transporters of the ABC protein family. ABC transport proteins are known for their capacity to protect the organism from potentially toxic xenobiotics through excretion, thereby decreasing intracellular concentrations. Indeed, typical localization of these export transporters are at the blood–brain barrier, placenta, gut, and at the apical side of liver and kidney cells. Two compounds may interact with the same transport protein through induction of expression, inhibition of protein function or competition of substrates. Pharmacokinetics of co-administered drugs can be critically altered when drug-drug interactions occur at the level of the ABC transport proteins, as distribution and selective excretion of these compounds may depend heavily on ABC protein-mediated transport. This can be reflected either in unexpected high blood plasma concentrations potentially causing toxic effects, or subtherapeutic concentrations at the site of action, diminishing therapeutic effects.

It is essential to assure effective blood plasma concentrations upon treatment with anti-malarial compounds in order to cure severely ill patients and prevent resistance acquisition through exposure of the parasite to sublethal blood plasma concentrations. The first-line treatment as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) currently consists of artemisinin-based combination therapy [2]. However, resistance against these regimens has been detected and the number of anti-malarials that can be subsequently applied are limited [3]. Toxic effects by unintended elevated blood plasma concentrations, however, should also be avoided.

Direct interaction with ABC transporter capacity of anti-malarial compounds has not been explored in detail. In vitro assays have indicated a possible effect on P-gp-mediated transport or expression after exposure to chloroquine, quinine, mefloquine, primaquine, amodiaquine, piperaquine, artemisinin, and dihydroartemisinin, however, contradictory conclusions concerning the interaction of anti-malarial compounds with ABC transport proteins could be drawn from different experimental set-ups [4–9]. A possible interaction of anti-malarial compounds with MRP-type transporters and BCRP has also been described [10–13]. Co-administration of anti-malarial compounds with other drug types is highly anticipated. For instance, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and malaria co-infections are likely to occur, as there is a high overlap in geographical dissemination [14]. Therefore, the effect of anti-malarial compounds on ABC-mediated transport capacity should be explored in more detail in order to secure the most effective treatment strategies for patients receiving multiple drug regimens.

In this study the direct interaction of a panel of eight well-known anti-malarial compounds (chloroquine, quinine, artemisinin, mefloquine, lumefantrine, atovaquone, dihydroartemisinin, and proguanil) with transport activity of P-gp, MRP1-4, BCRP and BSEP in a vesicular overexpression transport assay have been analysed. Anti-malarials (100 μM) that caused a decrease in substrate transport larger than 66.7% were further characterized to determine their 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50). Potent and previously undescribed inhibition of BCRP-mediated transport by atovaquone and P-gp-mediated transport by quinine was observed at concentrations within their therapeutic range.

Methods

Materials

[6,7-3H(N)]Estrone-sulphate ammonium salt ([3H]-E1S, specific activity 45.6 Ci/mmol), Tauro[carbonyl-3H]Cholic Acid sodium salt ([3H]TCA) (5 Ci/mmol) and [6,7-3H(N)]Estradiol 17-β-D-glucuronide ([3H]-E217βG) (34.3 Ci/mmol) were purchased from PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences (Groningen, Netherlands). [3H(N)]-methyl quinidine ([3H]-NMQ) (80 Ci/mmol) and unlabelled NMQ [N-methyl-quinidine] were purchased from Solvo Biotechnology (Szeged, Hungary). Bac-to-Bac and Gateway systems, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, GlutaMAX-I culture medium, and foetal calf serum were purchased from Life Technologies (Bleiswijk, Netherlands). Primers were purchased from Biolegio (Nijmegen, Netherlands), and a plasmid purification midiprep kit was from Genomed (Löhn, Germany). Triple flasks (500 cm2) were purchased from Sanbio BV Biological Products (Uden, Netherlands). Estradiol 17-β-D-glucuronide (E217βG), estrone-sulphate (E1S), taurocholic acid (TCA) adenosine 5’-triphosphate magnesium salt (bacterial source), goat-anti-mouse IgG antibody IRDye 800 and goat-anti-rabbit Alexa 680 secondary antibodies, chloroquine (CQ), quinine (Q), artemisinin (ART), mefloquine (MQ), lumefantrine (L), atovaquone (ATO), dihydroartemisinin (DHA), and proguanil (PG) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Zwijndrecht, Netherlands). Protein concentrations were determined with a Bio-Rad protein assay kit from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Veenendaal, Netherlands), and 96-well filter plates were purchased from Millipore (Etten-leur, Netherlands).

Baculovirus generation

Human P-gp, BCRP, BSEP and MRP1-4 had previously been cloned into the Gateway pDONR221 vector. Sequences matched accession numbers NM_000927, NM_004827, NM_003742, NM_004996, NM_000392, NM_00378, and NM_005845 respectively [15–19]. Some sequences did hold silent mutations of described polymorphisms. Gateway cloning was used to transfer the genes into a VSV-G improved pFastBacDual vector for mammalian cell transduction. The production of baculovirus was executed according to the Invitrogen Bac-to-Bac manual.

Cell culture and transduction

HEK293 cells were grown to 40% confluency in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium-GlutaMAX-I containing 10% foetal calf serum at 5% CO2 in 500 cm2 triple flasks. Culture medium was removed and 25 mL of medium combined with 10 mL virus was added and incubated at RT for 20 min, followed by the addition of another 40 mL of complete medium including 5 mM sodium butyrate to enhance protein expression.

Membrane vesicle isolation and protein analysis

Cells were harvested three days post transduction by a 5-min centrifugation step at 3,000 g. Cells were resuspended in ice-cold hypotonic buffer (0.5 mM sodium phosphate, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.0) containing protease inhibitors (100 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 mg/ml aprotinin, 5 mg/ml leupeptin, 1 mg/ml pepstatin and 1 mg/ml E-64) and shaken at 4°C for 30 min. This lysate was centrifuged 100,000 xg for 30 min at 4°C, after which the pellet was homogenized in ice-cold TS buffer (10 mM Tris-HEPES and 250 mM sucrose, pH 7.4) supplemented with protease inhibitors described before using a tight-fitting Dounce homogenizer for 25 strokes. Two subsequent centrifugation steps at 4°C of firstly 20 min at 4,000 g followed by supernatant centrifugation for 60 min at 100,000 g ensured harvesting of the membrane fraction. The pellet was resuspended in ice-cold protease free TS buffer and passed 25 times through a 27-gauge needle to enhance membrane vesicle formation. Protein concentration in these vesicles was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay, vesicles were flash-frozen in N2 and stored at -80°C.

Vesicular transport assays

A rapid filtration technique that has been described earlier was applied to evaluate uptake of transporter specific substrates into the vesicles; NMQ for P-gp, E1S for BCRP, E217βG for MRP1-4 and TCA for BSEP [20]. Briefly, 0.015-0.15 μCi of labelled substrate was combined with unlabelled substrates to a concentration of 0.1-1 μM in a 30 μL reaction mixture with 4 mM ATP, 10 mM MgCl2 and 7.5 μg total protein membrane vesicles in TS buffer. Transport was allowed by transfer of the plates to 37°C during 1–5 min, a time-point within the linear phase of time-dependent transport, as previously determined [15–19]. Hereafter, the reaction was rapidly stopped by placing the plates back on ice and the addition of 150 μL ice-cold TS buffer. Samples were subsequently transferred to a 96-well filter plate that had been pre-incubated with TS buffer, and filtered using a multiscreen HTS-vacuum manifold filtration device (Millipore). Filters were washed and extracted, after which 2 mL scintillation fluid was added to each filter. Radioactive signal on the filters was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Negative controls included eYFP-transduced vesicles and AMP instead of ATP in the reaction mixture.

In the first screen, all anti-malarial compounds were added to the reaction mixture to evaluate transport inhibition at a concentration of 100 μM. Solvents were used as negative controls, as CQ was dissolved in milliQ, Q and ART in methanol, MQ, L, ATO and DHA in DMSO and PG in 50% ethanol. When ATP-dependent uptake was reduced more than 66.7%, the compound was considered a potential inhibitor, and multiple concentrations were tested in the reaction mixture to determine the IC50 value. All concentrations were tested in duplicates or triplicates in two individual biological replicates containing vesicles of independent transductions. Results were depicted and statistically analysed using Graphpad Prism, version 5.03. IC50 values were determined by nonlinear regression analysis of (log) inhibitor-response curves with variable slope. Maximal transport was restricted to 100%, and the minimum was set to be equal or greater than 0%. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20, applying one-way ANOVA (Analysis of variance).

Results

Inhibitory profile of anti-malarials against ABC transporter activity

The inhibitory characteristics against the ABC transporters of eight well-known anti-malarials; CQ, Q, ART, MQ, L, ATO, DHA and PG, was investigated at a 100 μM concentration. For each transporter protein, specific radio-labelled substrates were applied to measure ATP-dependent transport into the vesicular overexpression system; N-methyl quinidine (7nM radio-labelled diluted with 90 nM non-radio-labelled) for P-gp, estrone sulphate (74 nM) for BCRP, estradiol 17-β-D glucuronide (150 nM) for MRP1-4 and taurocholic acid (1 μM) for BSEP [16–19].A significant inhibitory effect of 100 μM CQ, Q, MQ and PG on P-gp-mediated NMQ transport was observed. CQ reduced NMQ transport to 50% (p < 0.001) and PG to 76% (p < 0.001), whereas Q and MQ gave more pronounced inhibitory effects to 15% (p < 0.001) and 30% (p < 0.001) P-gp-mediated NMQ transport, respectively. ART and DHA slightly induced transport activity to 131% (p < 0.001) and 112% (p = 0.033), respectively (Figure 1A). All anti-malarials inhibited BCRP-mediated estrone sulphate transport activity at 100 μM concentrations. Most potent inhibitors were MQ, ATO and PG, which reduced estrone sulphate transport to 8.5%, 22% and 36% with p < 0.001, respectively (Figure 1B). CQ reduced transport to 69%, Q to 45%, ART to 62%, L to 44%, and DHA to 70% of solvent-exposed BCRP-mediated transport capacity (p < 0.001). Significant inhibition of taurocholic acid transport by BSEP was observed for ATO, which reduced uptake to 54% (p < 0.001) and MQ, which reduced uptake to 72% (p = 0.037). Furthermore, induction of BSEP transport activity was found for CQ (117%, p < 0.001), ART (117%, p < 0.001) and DHA (114%, p < 0.001) (Figure 1C). MQ was found to have a modest but significant inhibitory effect on estradiol 17-β-D glucuronide transport by MRP1 as this was reduced to 50% (p < 0.001), whereas ATO was observed to induce this process to 141% (p < 0.001) (Figure 1D). Induction was also observed for ART and ATO on MRP2-mediated estradiol 17-β-D glucuronide transport to 151% (p = 0.015) and 162% (p = 0.020), respectively. However, no significant inhibition was measured for any of the anti-malarials tested (Figure 1E). MRP3-mediated translocation of estradiol 17-β-D glucuronide was significantly inhibited by MQ at a 100 μM concentration to 70% (p = 0.001), whereas ART and DHA induced this process to 122% (p = 0.016) and 121% (p = 0.020), respectively (Figure 1F). No significant estradiol 17-β-D glucuronide transport inhibition of MRP4 could be detected (Figure 1F). As the 100 μM concentration is not within the physiological range of compound exposure, the most potent inhibitors were selected for further investigation. Inhibition of Q and MQ on P-gp-mediated transport, as well as BCRP inhibition by MQ, ATO and PG, were studied in more detail to determine their potencies.

Figure 1
figure1

Inhibitory effect of anti-malarial drugs on ABC transport activity. The inhibitory effect of 100 μM of CQ, Q, ART, MQ, L, ATO, DHA and PG on ABC transporter activity was assessed. Transport was measured in pmol/mg protein/min and expressed as percentage of solvent controls, which represent 100% transport. Bars with * are significantly different from solvent controls, p < 0.05. A P-gp-mediated transport of NMQ was significantly inhibited by CQ, Q, MQ and PG, and increased by ART and DHA. B BCRP-mediated transport of E1S was significantly inhibited by all compounds, most pronounced inhibitors were MQ and ATO. C BSEP-mediated transport of TCA was significantly inhibited by ATO, but not by the other anti-malarials. Induction of transport was observed for CQ, ART and DHA. D-G MRP1-4-mediated E217βG transport. MQ significantly inhibited MRP1 and MRP3 transport activity. Furthermore, induction of MRP1 mediated transport was found for ATO, which, together with ART, also stimulated MRP2 transport activity. MRP3 mediated transport was stimulated by both ART and DHA. Inhibition larger than 66.7% was found for Q and MQ on P-gp transport, as well as MQ, ATO and PG on BCRP transport activity (highlighted bars).

Full size image

Determination of inhibitory potency of strong inhibitors

Subsequently, transport inhibition assays were performed for a larger concentration range of Q, MQ, ATO and PG to evaluate P-gp or BCRP activity. Inhibition of transport was measured in a similar fashion applying the same specific radio-labelled substrates. Drug concentrations were logarithmically depicted, and a sigmoidal, inhibitor-response, variable slope equation was fitted to the data to determine the inhibition curve. Maximal inhibition to 0% transport was not always reached, which might be due to endogenous transport present in the vesicular membranes.

The strongest inhibitory effect for ATO on BCRP-mediated transport was found at median nanomolar range. Transport of estrone sulphate was inhibited with 50% by this compound at 0.23 μM (95% CI 0.17-0.29 μM) (Figure 2A), whereas MQ and PG required the addition of 18 μM (95% CI 17–20 μM) (Figure 2B) and 118 μM (95% CI 93–148 μM) (Figure 2C) to achieve a similar effect on BCRP activity, respectively. Also for the other compound-transporter combinations, IC50 values were found in the low to median micromolar range. The effect of Q on P-gp-mediated NMQ transport inhibition was the strongest, and the IC50 was defined at 6.8 μM (95% CI 5.9-7.8 μM) (Figure 2D). MQ was a less potent inhibitor with an IC50 of 72 μM (95% CI 49–104 μM) (Figure 2E). The inhibitory concentration of ATO and Q transport were within the therapeutic range of blood plasma concentrations after both prophylactic and curative anti-malarial dosing.

Figure 2
figure2

Concentration-dependent inhibition of potent anti-malarial inhibitors of BCRP and P-gp. BCRP activity was inhibited according to the dose–response curves for A ATO B MQ and C PG.The inhibition of NMQ transport by P-gp was determined for D Q and E MQ.

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, the interaction of anti-malarial compounds CQ, Q, ART, MQ, L, ATO, DHA and PG with the activity of P-gp, BCRP, MRP1-4 and BSEP ABC transport proteins were investigated. ATO was found to be a strong inhibitor of BCRP-mediated transport, which has not been described previously. Also Q was identified as a potent inhibitor of P-gp-mediated transport. In addition, subtle alterations on transporter activity have also been identified for other compound-transporter combinations, both inhibitory and stimulating. These interactions can be either competitive or non-competitive. Allosteric interactions that stimulate transport have been observed for several ABC transporters and are substrate dependent, due to which translation of these results to other transporter-substrate combinations is difficult.

A 50% inhibition of BCRP-mediated transport activity could be achieved with 0.23 μM ATO. This concentration is easily reached in blood plasma during both prophylactic and therapeutic use of ATO, as maximal ATO blood plasma concentrations are around 14 μM (range 8–26 μM) after a daily prophylactic dose of 250 mg [21]. Although the free concentration of ATO is reduced due to its high plasma protein binding, intracellular concentrations at the target site may be higher. ATO is used in a fixed combination with PG in Malarone®, which is prophylactively prescribed to travellers, and at higher dosages to treat falciparum malaria, especially in regions of ACT failure [2, 22]. BCRP is located primarily on the apical side of excretory organs, and it is highly involved in excretion of xenobiotics from the body [23, 24]. As ATO is excreted into bile against steep concentration gradients, involvement of ABC transport proteins such as BCRP is likely [25] and interactions with ATO can occur when elimination of co-administered therapeutics is inhibited.

Indeed, cases of interactions with ATO have been reported. The azithromycin AUC (area under the curve) and maximal concentrations were lower in all patients when taken in combination with ATO by HIV-1 positive children [26]. Although direct interaction of azithromycin with BCRP has not been investigated, interaction at this level cannot be excluded. Moreover, a clear increase in plasma concentration of etravirine, a reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and saquinavir, a protease inhibitor, was observed in a Caucasian female who started malaria prophylaxis with ATO/PG (250/100 mg) fixed dose combination [27]. Etravirine and saquinavir were prescribed to treat HIV1 subtype B in an antiretroviral combination therapy, supplemented with raltegravir and maraviroc. AUCs, during a 12-hour measurement interval, were increased 55% for etravirine and 274% for saquinavir, and peak concentrations after administration of the antiretrovirals was markedly increased. Saquinavir and etravirine have previously been described as potent BCRP inhibitors, but not substrates, with IC50 concentrations of 19.5 and 1.0 μM [28, 29]. Both raltegravir and maraviroc do not inhibit BCRP, indicating that interaction with BCRP is specific for saquinavir and etravirine [30]. An alternative or complementary explanation could be interaction at the level of Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, as PG is mainly metabolized by CYP2C19 but also partly by CYP3A4, saquinavir by CYP3A4 and etravirine mainly by CYP3A4 and to a minor extent by CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 [31–33]. Raltegravir is not metabolized by members of the CYP family, however, maraviroc is a substrate of CYP3A4 [34, 35]. A strong correlation at this level of drug interaction could therefore not be observed, stressing the plausible role of transporter-mediated drug interactions.

Another study demonstrated a significant decrease in ATO plasma concentration when taken in combination with efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir/ritonavir therapy [36]. Interaction at the level of metabolism through glucuronidation was proposed. However, as ATO is only marginally glucuronidated but mostly excreted unchanged into the bile, interaction at the level of ABC transport proteins and more specifically BCRP could play an important role [25]. Indeed, efavirenz, lopinavir and atazinavir have been described as inhibitors of BCRP-mediated transport [37]. Lopinavir and efavirenz were found to be stronger inhibitors, and correspondingly, ATO concentration was decreased more drastically in these two combinations compared to atazinavir co-administration.

Other pharmaceuticals that interact with BCRP-mediated transport are fluoroquinolone antibiotics, kinase inhibitors, cytostatics, antifolates, and statins [38–44]. Interactions with ATO therapy might be anticipated when co-administered. These drugs are not widely used in malaria-endemic areas, however, interactions with prophylactic doses of ATO used by travellers can be anticipated.

A 50% inhibition of P-gp-mediated transport by Q was found at a concentration of 6.8 μM. Indeed, in other in xvitro cellular uptake experiments Q has been described to be both an inhibitor and a substrate of P-gp [4, 8, 9, 45–48]. The concentration at which Q was effective was lower in the current study than previously described. Most likely this can be attributed to the difference in substrates used. Maximal plasma concentrations reach 30 μM during a seven-day regimen of 10 mg/kg oral dose three times daily of quinine sulphate, and although Q is bound to plasma-proteins to some extent, clinically relevant interactions at the level of P-gp-mediated transport during quinine treatment may be expected [49].

Interactions with Q have been described for ritonavir/lopinavir combination therapy as well as ritonavir monotherapy, and for nevirapine, rifampicin, cyclosporine, and digoxin. Q co-administration with digoxin decreased billary excretion of the latter, indicating specific involvement of transport processes [50]. When co-administered with ritonavir, Q blood plasma concentrations were increased [51]. Ritonavir indeed is both a substrate and inhibitor of P-gp, therefore interaction at this level may explain the increase in Q concentration [52, 53]. After rifampicin, nevirapine and lopinavir co-administration, Q blood plasma concentrations were decreased [49, 54–56]. Rifampicin interacts with P-gp as substrate, inhibitor and inducer, and lopinavir has been found to inhibit P-gp [57–59]. However, this has not been shown for nevirapine. Q is one of the oldest anti-malarial drugs still in use, and although it is not used any more in first-line treatment strategy, its use has increased as it is often applied as an alternative treatment after ACT stock-outs [60]. Furthermore, for treatment of malaria infections in pregnant women it is one of the few compounds that can be applied safely [61]. Adherence to this compound is known to be low due to the large range of common and often plasma concentration-dependent side effects [62]. For these reasons, establishing effective but non-toxic blood plasma concentrations is essential in the treatment of malaria, and interaction with co-administered compounds that mediate P-gp transport should be tightly monitored.

Especially, the interaction of both ATO and Q with antiretroviral medication could have severe implications on treatment strategies for both infections, as HIV is another major contributing factor to morbidity, especially in sub-Saharan regions of Africa [14]. Many different antiretroviral compounds are being prescribed, depending on personal characteristics and resistance status, and for many of these compounds interactions with BCRP have been described.

Conclusions

Anti-malarial compounds can reduce ABC transporter activity. ATO appeared to be a potent inhibitor of BCRP and Q of P-gp in vitro. Both compounds inhibited ABC transporter activity at concentrations equalling prophylactic and effective blood plasma concentrations. Potential involvement in interactions with antiretroviral and antibiotic compounds have been described for ATO and Q, which can be explained by the observed inhibitory effects on BCRP and P-gp transport activity.

Abbreviations

ABC transporter:

ATP binding cassette transporter

P-gp:

P-glycoprotein

BCRP:

Breast cancer resistance protein

BSEP:

Bile salt export protein

MRP:

Multidrug resistance-associated protein

ACT:

Artemisinin combination therapy

CYP450:

Cytochrome P450

IC50:

50% inhibitory concentration

95% CI:

95% confidence interval

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

NRT:

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase

NNRT:

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase

PI:

Protease inhibitor

CQ:

Chloroquine

Q:

Quinine

ART:

Artemisinin

MQ:

Mefloquine

L:

Lumefantrine

ATO:

Atovaquone

DHA:

Dihydroartemisinin

PG:

Proguanil.

References

  1. 1.

    Borst P, Elferink RO: Mammalian ABC transporters in health and disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002, 71: 537-592. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.102301.093055.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    WHO: World Malaria Report 2012. 2012, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, Lwin KM, Ariey F, Hanpithakpong W, Lee SJ, Ringwald P, Silamut K, Imwong M, Chotivanich K, Lim P, Herdman T, An SS, Yeung S, Singhasivanon P, Day NP, Lindegardh N, Socheat D, White NJ: Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 455-467. 10.1056/NEJMoa0808859.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hayeshi R, Masimirembwa C, Mukanganyama S, Ungell AL: The potential inhibitory effect of antiparasitic drugs and natural products on P-glycoprotein mediated efflux. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006, 29: 70-81. 10.1016/j.ejps.2006.05.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Riffkin CD, Chung R, Wall DM, Zalcberg JR, Cowman AF, Foley M, Tilley L: Modulation of the function of human MDR1 P-glycoprotein by the antimalarial drug mefloquine. Biochem Pharmacol. 1996, 52: 1545-1552. 10.1016/S0006-2952(96)00556-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Crowe A, Ilett KF, Karunajeewa HA, Batty KT, Davis TM: Role of P glycoprotein in absorption of novel antimalarial drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50: 3504-3506. 10.1128/AAC.00708-06.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Burk O, Arnold KA, Nussler AK, Schaeffeler E, Efimova E, Avery BA, Avery MA, Fromm MF, Eichelbaum M: Antimalarial artemisinin drugs induce cytochrome P450 and MDR1 expression by activation of xenosensors pregnane X receptor and constitutive androstane receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2005, 67: 1954-1965. 10.1124/mol.104.009019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Solary E, Velay I, Chauffert B, Bidan JM, Caillot D, Dumas M, Guy H: Sufficient levels of quinine in the serum circumvent the multidrug resistance of the human leukemic cell line K562/ADM. Cancer. 1991, 68: 1714-1719. 10.1002/1097-0142(19911015)68:8<1714::AID-CNCR2820680811>3.0.CO;2-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lehnert M, Dalton WS, Roe D, Emerson S, Salmon SE: Synergistic inhibition by verapamil and quinine of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance in a human myeloma cell line model. Blood. 1991, 77: 348-354.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Vezmar M, Georges E: Direct binding of chloroquine to the multidrug resistance protein (MRP): possible role for MRP in chloroquine drug transport and resistance in tumor cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998, 56: 733-742. 10.1016/S0006-2952(98)00217-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stark M, Rothem L, Jansen G, Scheffer GL, Goldman ID, Assaraf YG: Antifolate resistance associated with loss of MRP1 expression and function in Chinese hamster ovary cells with markedly impaired export of folate and cholate. Mol Pharmacol. 2003, 64: 220-227. 10.1124/mol.64.2.220.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Efferth T, Olbrich A, Bauer R: mRNA expression profiles for the response of human tumor cell lines to the antimalarial drugs artesunate, arteether, and artemether. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002, 64: 617-623. 10.1016/S0006-2952(02)01221-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bram E, Ifergan I, Shafran A, Berman B, Jansen G, Assaraf YG: Mutant Gly482 and Thr482 ABCG2 mediate high-level resistance to lipophilic antifolates. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006, 58: 826-834. 10.1007/s00280-006-0230-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    WHO: Global Update on HIV Treatment 2013: Results, Impact and Opportunities. 2013, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    El-Sheikh AA, van den Heuvel JJ, Koenderink JB, Russel FG: Interaction of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with multidrug resistance protein (MRP) 2/ABCC2- and MRP4/ABCC4-mediated methotrexate transport. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007, 320: 229-235.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wittgen HG, van den Heuvel JJ, van den Broek PH, Dinter-Heidorn H, Koenderink JB, Russel FG: Cannabinoid type 1 receptor antagonists modulate transport activity of multidrug resistance-associated proteins MRP1, MRP2, MRP3, and MRP4. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011, 39: 1294-1302. 10.1124/dmd.110.037812.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gozalpour E, Wittgen HG, van den Heuvel JJ, Greupink R, Russel FG, Koenderink JB: Interaction of digitalis-like compounds with p-glycoprotein. Toxicol Sci. 2013, 131: 502-511. 10.1093/toxsci/kfs307.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dankers AC, Sweep FC, Pertijs JC, Verweij V, van den Heuvel JJ, Koenderink JB, Russel FG, Masereeuw R: Localization of breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp) in endocrine organs and inhibition of its transport activity by steroid hormones. Cell Tissue Res. 2012, 349: 551-563. 10.1007/s00441-012-1417-5.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    van Beusekom CD, van den Heuvel JJ, Koenderink JB, Schrickx JA, Russel FG: The feline bile salt export pump: a structural and functional comparison with canine and human Bsep/BSEP. BMC Vet Res. 2013, 9: 259-10.1186/1746-6148-9-259.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Van Aubel RA, Koenderink JB, Peters JG, Van Os CH, Russel FG: Mechanisms and interaction of vinblastine and reduced glutathione transport in membrane vesicles by the rabbit multidrug resistance protein Mrp2 expressed in insect cells. Mol Pharmacol. 1999, 56: 714-719.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Thapar MM, Ashton M, Lindegardh N, Bergqvist Y, Nivelius S, Johansson I, Bjorkman A: Time-dependent pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism of atovaquone plus proguanil (Malarone) when taken as chemoprophylaxis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002, 58: 19-27. 10.1007/s00228-002-0426-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lalloo DG, Hill DR: Preventing malaria in travellers. BMJ. 2008, 336: 1362-1366. 10.1136/bmj.a153.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Huls M, Brown CD, Windass AS, Sayer R, van den Heuvel JJ, Heemskerk S, Russel FG, Masereeuw R: The breast cancer resistance protein transporter ABCG2 is expressed in the human kidney proximal tubule apical membrane. Kidney Int. 2008, 73: 220-225. 10.1038/sj.ki.5002645.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Maliepaard M, Scheffer GL, Faneyte IF, van Gastelen MA, Pijnenborg AC, Schinkel AH, van De Vijver MJ, Scheper RJ, Schellens JH: Subcellular localization and distribution of the breast cancer resistance protein transporter in normal human tissues. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 3458-3464.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rolan PE, Mercer AJ, Tate E, Benjamin I, Posner J: Disposition of atovaquone in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997, 41: 1319-1321.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ngo LY, Yogev R, Dankner WM, Hughes WT, Burchett S, Xu J, Sadler B, Unadkat JD: Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin administered alone and with atovaquone in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children. The ACTG 254 Team. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999, 43: 1516-1519.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tommasi C, Bellagamba R, Tempestilli M, D'Avolio A, Gallo AL, Ivanovic J, Nicastri E, Pucillo LP, Narciso P: Marked increase in etravirine and saquinavir plasma concentrations during atovaquone/proguanil prophylaxis. Malar J. 2011, 10: 141-10.1186/1475-2875-10-141.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gupta A, Zhang Y, Unadkat JD, Mao Q: HIV protease inhibitors are inhibitors but not substrates of the human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004, 310: 334-341. 10.1124/jpet.104.065342.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zembruski NC, Haefeli WE, Weiss J: Interaction potential of etravirine with drug transporters assessed in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011, 55: 1282-1284. 10.1128/AAC.01527-10.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zembruski NC, Buchel G, Jodicke L, Herzog M, Haefeli WE, Weiss J: Potential of novel antiretrovirals to modulate expression and function of drug transporters in vitro. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011, 66: 802-812. 10.1093/jac/dkq501.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lu AH, Shu Y, Huang SL, Wang W, Ou-Yang DS, Zhou HH: In vitro proguanil activation to cycloguanil is mediated by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 in adult Chinese liver microsomes. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2000, 21: 747-752.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Eagling VA, Back DJ, Barry MG: Differential inhibition of cytochrome P450 isoforms by the protease inhibitors, ritonavir, saquinavir and indinavir. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997, 44: 190-194.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Scholler-Gyure M, Kakuda TN, Raoof A, De Smedt G, Hoetelmans RM: Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of etravirine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009, 48: 561-574. 10.2165/10895940-000000000-00000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cocohoba J, Dong BJ: Raltegravir: the first HIV integrase inhibitor. Clin Ther. 2008, 30: 1747-1765. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.10.012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Abel S, Russell D, Taylor-Worth RJ, Ridgway CE, Muirhead GJ: Effects of CYP3A4 inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of maraviroc in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008, 65 (Suppl 1): 27-37.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    van Luin M, Van der Ende ME, Richter C, Visser M, Faraj D, Van der Ven A, Gelinck L, Kroon F, Wit FW, Van Schaik RH, Kuks PF, Burger DM: Lower atovaquone/proguanil concentrations in patients taking efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir/ritonavir. AIDS. 2010, 24: 1223-1226. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283389129.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Weiss J, Rose J, Storch CH, Ketabi-Kiyanvash N, Sauer A, Haefeli WE, Efferth T: Modulation of human BCRP (ABCG2) activity by anti-HIV drugs. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007, 59: 238-245.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Merino G, Alvarez AI, Pulido MM, Molina AJ, Schinkel AH, Prieto JG: Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) transports fluoroquinolone antibiotics and affects their oral availability, pharmacokinetics, and milk secretion. Drug Metab Dispos. 2006, 34: 690-695. 10.1124/dmd.105.008219.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Burger H, van Tol H, Boersma AW, Brok M, Wiemer EA, Stoter G, Nooter K: Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a substrate for the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)/ABCG2 drug pump. Blood. 2004, 104: 2940-2942. 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1398.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Elkind NB, Szentpetery Z, Apati A, Ozvegy-Laczka C, Varady G, Ujhelly O, Szabo K, Homolya L, Varadi A, Buday L, Kéri G, Német K, Sarkadi B: Multidrug transporter ABCG2 prevents tumor cell death induced by the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor Iressa (ZD1839, Gefitinib). Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 1770-1777. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3303.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Brendel C, Scharenberg C, Dohse M, Robey RW, Bates SE, Shukla S, Ambudkar SV, Wang Y, Wennemuth G, Burchert A, Boudriot U, Neubauer A: Imatinib mesylate and nilotinib (AMN107) exhibit high-affinity interaction with ABCG2 on primitive hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia. 2007, 21: 1267-1275. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404638.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chen ZS, Robey RW, Belinsky MG, Shchaveleva I, Ren XQ, Sugimoto Y, Ross DD, Bates SE, Kruh GD: Transport of methotrexate, methotrexate polyglutamates, and 17beta-estradiol 17-(beta-D-glucuronide) by ABCG2: effects of acquired mutations at R482 on methotrexate transport. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 4048-4054.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Matsushima S, Maeda K, Kondo C, Hirano M, Sasaki M, Suzuki H, Sugiyama Y: Identification of the hepatic efflux transporters of organic anions using double-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney II cells expressing human organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1)/multidrug resistance-associated protein 2, OATP1B1/multidrug resistance 1, and OATP1B1/breast cancer resistance protein. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005, 314: 1059-1067. 10.1124/jpet.105.085589.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Maliepaard M, van Gastelen MA, Tohgo A, Hausheer FH, van Waardenburg RC, de Jong LA, Pluim D, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH: Circumvention of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)-mediated resistance to camptothecins in vitro using non-substrate drugs or the BCRP inhibitor GF120918. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 935-941.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Borgnia MJ, Eytan GD, Assaraf YG: Competition of hydrophobic peptides, cytotoxic drugs, and chemosensitizers on a common P-glycoprotein pharmacophore as revealed by its ATPase activity. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 3163-3171. 10.1074/jbc.271.6.3163.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    van der Sandt IC, Blom-Roosemalen MC, de Boer AG, Breimer DD: Specificity of doxorubicin versus rhodamine-123 in assessing P-glycoprotein functionality in the LLC-PK1, LLC-PK1:MDR1 and Caco-2 cell lines. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2000, 11: 207-214. 10.1016/S0928-0987(00)00097-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wang EJ, Casciano CN, Clement RP, Johnson WW: Active transport of fluorescent P-glycoprotein substrates: evaluation as markers and interaction with inhibitors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001, 289: 580-585. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Nagy H, Goda K, Fenyvesi F, Bacso Z, Szilasi M, Kappelmayer J, Lustyik G, Cianfriglia M, Szabo G: Distinct groups of multidrug resistance modulating agents are distinguished by competition of P-glycoprotein-specific antibodies. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 315: 942-949. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.01.156.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Pukrittayakamee S, Prakongpan S, Wanwimolruk S, Clemens R, Looareesuwan S, White NJ: Adverse effect of rifampin on quinine efficacy in uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47: 1509-1513. 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1509-1513.2003.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hedman A, Angelin B, Arvidsson A, Dahlqvist R, Nilsson B: Interactions in the renal and biliary elimination of digoxin: stereoselective difference between quinine and quinidine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990, 47: 20-26. 10.1038/clpt.1990.3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Soyinka JO, Onyeji CO, Omoruyi SI, Owolabi AR, Sarma PV, Cook JM: Pharmacokinetic interactions between ritonavir and quinine in healthy volunteers following concurrent administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010, 69: 262-270. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03566.x.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Choo EF, Leake B, Wandel C, Imamura H, Wood AJ, Wilkinson GR, Kim RB: Pharmacological inhibition of P-glycoprotein transport enhances the distribution of HIV-1 protease inhibitors into brain and testes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2000, 28: 655-660.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Yamazaki M, Neway WE, Ohe T, Chen I, Rowe JF, Hochman JH, Chiba M, Lin JH: In vitro substrate identification studies for p-glycoprotein-mediated transport: species difference and predictability of in vivo results. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001, 296: 723-735.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Soyinka JO, Onyeji CO, Omoruyi SI, Owolabi AR, Sarma PV, Cook JM: Effects of concurrent administration of nevirapine on the disposition of quinine in healthy volunteers. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2009, 61: 439-443. 10.1211/jpp.61.04.0004.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Uriel A, Lewthwaite P: Malaria therapy in HIV: drug interactions between nevirapine and quinine. Int J STD AIDS. 2011, 22: 768-10.1258/ijsa.2009.009489.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Nyunt MM, Lu Y, El-Gasim M, Parsons TL, Petty BG, Hendrix CW: Effects of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir on the pharmacokinetics of quinine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012, 91: 889-895. 10.1038/clpt.2011.326.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Fardel O, Lecureur V, Loyer P, Guillouzo A: Rifampicin enhances anti-cancer drug accumulation and activity in multidrug-resistant cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 1995, 49: 1255-1260. 10.1016/0006-2952(95)00045-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Collett A, Tanianis-Hughes J, Hallifax D, Warhurst G: Predicting P-glycoprotein effects on oral absorption: correlation of transport in Caco-2 with drug pharmacokinetics in wild-type and mdr1a(-/-) mice in vivo. Pharm Res. 2004, 21: 819-826.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Geick A, Eichelbaum M, Burk O: Nuclear receptor response elements mediate induction of intestinal MDR1 by rifampin. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 14581-14587. 10.1074/jbc.M010173200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Yeka A, Achan J, D'Alessandro U, Talisuna AO: Quinine monotherapy for treating uncomplicated malaria in the era of artemisinin-based combination therapy: an appropriate public health policy?. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009, 9: 448-452. 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70109-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    WHO: Guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria. 2010, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Taylor WR, White NJ: Antimalarial drug toxicity: a review. Drug Saf. 2004, 27: 25-61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of SR is supported by a personal grant from Radboudumc.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands

    Sanna R Rijpma, Jeroen JMW van den Heuvel, Maarten van der Velden, Frans GM Russel & Jan B Koenderink

  2. Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands

    Robert W Sauerwein

Authors
  1. Sanna R Rijpma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeroen JMW van den Heuvel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maarten van der Velden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert W Sauerwein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frans GM Russel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jan B Koenderink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan B Koenderink.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SR contributed to the design of the study, the performance of the vesicle transport assays, the analysis of the data and drafted the manuscript. JH executed the vesicle transport assays and helped to draft the manuscript. MV participated in the transport studies and data analysis. RS contributed to the design of the study and critical revision of the manuscript. FR advised in the design of the study and adjusted the manuscript. JK conceived of the study, coordinated its execution and helped in the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rijpma, S.R., van den Heuvel, J.J., van der Velden, M. et al. Atovaquone and quinine anti-malarials inhibit ATP binding cassette transporter activity. Malar J 13, 359 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-359

Download citation

Keywords

  • ABC transporter
  • P-glycoprotein
  • BCRP
  • BSEP
  • MRP
  • Anti-malarial
  • Transport
  • Vesicle

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us