Open Access

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency among malaria suspects attending Gambella hospital, southwest Ethiopia

Contributed equally
Malaria Journal201413:438

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-438

Received: 14 August 2014

Accepted: 15 November 2014

Published: 18 November 2014

Abstract

Background

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd) is widespread across malaria endemic regions. G6PD-deficient individuals are at risk of haemolysis when exposed, among other agents, to primaquine and tafenoquine, which are capable of blocking malaria transmission by killing Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes and preventing Plasmodium vivax relapses by targeting hypnozoites. It is evident that no measures are currently in place to ensure safe delivery of these drugs within the context of G6PDd risk. Thus, determining G6PDd prevalence in malarious areas would contribute towards avoiding possible complications in malaria elimination using the drugs. This study, therefore, was aimed at determining G6PDd prevalence in Gambella hospital, southwest Ethiopia, using CareStart™ G6PDd fluorescence spot test.

Methods

Venous blood samples were collected from febrile patients (n = 449) attending Gambella hospital in November-December 2013. Malaria was diagnosed using blood films and G6PDd was screened using CareStart™ G6PDd screening test (Access Bio, New Jersey, USA). Haematological parameters were also measured. The association of G6PD phenotype with sex, ethnic group and malaria smear positivity was tested.

Results

Malaria prevalence was 59.2% (96.6% of the cases being P. falciparum mono infections). Totally 33 participants (7.3%) were G6PD-deficient with no significant difference between the sexes. The chance of being G6PD-deficient was significantly higher for the native ethnic groups (Anuak and Nuer) compared to the ‘highlanders’/settlers (odds ratio (OD) = 3.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.481-31.418 for Anuak vs ‘highlanders’; OD = 4.9, 95% CI 0.635-38.00 for Nuer vs ‘highlanders’). G6PDd prevalence among the Nuer (14.3%) was significantly higher than that for the Anuak (12.0%).

Conclusions

G6PDd prevalence in the area is substantial with 30 (90.9%) of the 33 deficient individuals having malaria suggesting the non-protective role of the disorder at least from clinical malaria. The indigenous Nilotic people tend to have a higher chance of being G6PD-deficient as 32 (96.9%) of the total 33 cases occurred among them.

Keywords

MalariaGlucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiencyPhenotypePrevalenceGambellaEthiopia

Background

Despite some reduction in the global burden of malaria in recent years[1], the disease still stands a grave public health concern. Apart from multiple environmental and parasite factors that complicate human-Plasmodium interactions, human genetic background confers additional complexity in the fight against malaria[2]. A high degree of variation exists between human populations and individuals with respect to malaria incidence, parasite density and disease severity and reactions to anti-malarials[3]. Although in some studies glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd) is associated with protection from severe malaria[4, 5] deficient individuals are reported to suffer from haemolytic anaemia when treated with primaquine[6], which is the only available drug against Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes[7] and a radical cure of Plasmodium vivax[8]. Further individuals with G6DPd are reported to suffer from haemolysis when treated with tafenoquine, another anti-malarial with proposed indication of treating hypnozoites of P. vivax and Plasmodium ovale[9].

G6PDd is one of the most common human enzymopathies which is in a very high frequency in tropical and subtropical malaria endemic regions[10, 11]. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the prevalence of G6PDd can reach up to 35% although organized reports are lacking and different allelic variants are unevenly distributed in the region[12]. However, with progressive improvements in detection methods past G6PDd prevalence figures may need continuous revision. Population screening is recommended in regions where G6PDd prevalence is ≥3–5% to decide on the use of primaquine/tafenoquine and minimize the risk of primaquine/tefenoquine-induced complications in malaria elimination schemes[13]. In Ethiopia, past population-based G6PDd studies are limited and the practice of G6PDd screening in healthcare settings is also missing. As a result, vital information on G6PDd prevalence is lacking in the country, especially in malaria endemic foci. This study, therefore, was aimed at bridging the gap by diagnosing G6PDd among malaria suspects attending Gambella hospital, southwest Ethiopia, using a qualitative rapid G6PDd screening kit.

Methods

Study area

The study was conducted in Gambella hospital, Gambella Town. The town is the administrative center of Gambella Regional State and is located in the southwest of Ethiopia at about 777 km from Addis Ababa. Gambella hospital which serves an estimated 200,000 patients is the only hospital in the Region when this study was conducted. Gambella Region borders with Benishangul Gumuz and Oromiya Regions in the north; with the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Region (SNNPR) and the Sudan to the south; Oromiya and SNNPR to the east and the Sudan to the west. The region has an area of 25,800 km2 with an estimated total population of 42,474 having six major native Nilotic ethnic groups, namely, Anuak (also called Anywaa), Nuer, Majenger, Opo, Surma and Komo[14]. The Nuer and the Anuak are the dominant groups in the region and in Gambella Town settlers of various ethnic origins who moved from all over Ethiopia are loosely defined as “highlanders”.

The town is a lowland area with average altitude of 300–500 metres above sea level and has latitude and longitude of 8°15′00″ N and 34°34′59″ E, respectively. The main rainy season of the region is between May and October, and from November through April it is mostly dry[15]. According to this same source[15], the mean annual temperature of the region ranges from 17.3 to 28.3°C and the annual monthly temperature vary between 27 and 33°C throughout the year. The absolute maximum and minimum temperatures are 45.0 and 10.3°C occurring in mid-March and December, respectively. The average yearly rainfall is 1200 millimetre. Subsistence cultivation of maize and sorghum along the sides of the major rivers - Baro, Akobo and Gilo - is practiced by the Anuak. Fishing and forest hunting may be supplementary income sources. Most Nuers who mainly live in the driest Ethio-Sudanese border of the region largely depend on livestock[16].

Gambella is characterized by high malaria transmission due to its suitable climate and high rainfall. P. falciparum and P. vivax contribute to most of the malaria cases of the general population and Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles pharoensis are the primary mosquito vector species[17]. Some Plasmodium malariae cases were also reported from Gambella in an extensive epidemiological study in the late 1960s[18].

Study population and design

Asymptomatic individuals for G6PDd but suspected of malaria (axillary temperature ≥37.5°C) were recruited in a hospital-based cross-sectional study between mid-November and December 2013. Patients who had received anti-malarial treatment within the past 48 hours and those having chronic illnesses were excluded. The minimum sample size (n) for the study was calculated using the formula n = Z 2 × P 1 P m Z [19]; where ‘Z’ is standard normal distribution curve value for the 95% confidence interval (CI) (Z = 1.96), ‘p’ estimate prevalence (0.5%) and ‘m’ 5% margin of error (0.05). With a response rate of 96%, the estimated sample size was 400.

Sample collection and analysis

After a questionnaire and clinical examination, 5 ml venous blood was collected in ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) for measuring haematological parameters, malaria diagnosis and G6PDd screening. The haematological parameters - haemoglobin (Hb), haematocrit (HCT) and packed cell volume (PCV) - and red cell indices (mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were determined using an automated system, CELL-DYN 1400 haematology analyzer (Abbott, USA). Thick and thin blood smears were prepared and stained using 10% Giemsa solution to detect malaria. The stained slides were examined under a light microscope using the oil immersion objective (100X). Two experienced laboratory technologists independently screened the slides and discrepancies were settled by a third person’s blind test. Parasite density was calculated per 200 white blood cells (WBC) assuming 8,000 WBC/μl of blood[20]. G6PDd was screened using CareStart™ G6PDd screening test (Access Bio, Inc., New Jersey, USA) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, a 2 μl whole blood was added to a sample well and then 100 μl of assay buffer to the buffer well immediately after application of blood. The result was read normal as distinct purple colour, deficient as no colour or a very faint purple colour; and invalid when there is no blood migration or incomplete blood migration in the reading window within 10 minutes.

Data analysis

Data were entered in Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, checked for correctness and completeness, and exported to and analysed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 20 (SPSS IBM, Chicago, IL). The Chi-squared (X2) test was used to determine the association between occurrence of malaria and G6PD status. Difference between means of haematological parameters for G6PD-deficent and normal individuals was analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). The logistic regression model was used to determine the relationship between sex and ethnic group with G6PD-deficent phenotype.

Ethical clearance

The study obtained ethical clearance from College of Natural Sciences Institutional Ethics Review Board, Addis Ababa University. The study participants were recruited after providing their voluntary informed consent. Health personnel examined the patients, collected blood sample and treated malaria positives free of charge as per the national treatment guideline.

Results

Overall, 510 febrile patients were prescribed for malaria blood smear during the study period. Fourteen individuals who declined to participate and 47 who had received anti-malarial treatment within the past 48 hours prior to sample collection were excluded. Thus blood samples from 449 patients, 210 males and 239 females, were analysed. The mean age was 16 years, median 15 and range 1–90 years; and mean haemoglobin (Hb) was 14.02 g/dl and median 13.3 g/dl, with no significant difference between the sexes. Overall, 266(59.2%) individuals were malaria smear positive with 257(96.6%) P. falciparum mono, 7(2.6%) P. vivax mono and 2(0.75%) P. falciparum/P. vivax mixed infections. Thirty three (7.3%) individuals were deficient for G6PD enzyme activity (Table 1). Although the prevalence of G6PDd was slightly higher among males (8.6%) than females (6.3%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.354). In a univariate logistic analysis, the odds of being G6PD-deficient were 1.4 times higher for males [95% CI 0.678-2.853] than for females but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, the occurrence of G6PDd varied between ethnic groups. A greater proportion of the Nuer were G6PD-deficient (14.3%) compared to the ‘highlanders’ combined, who were all non-deficient except a single Kambata. The 12.0% G6PDd prevalence among the Anuak was also substantial compared to the almost nil ‘highlanders’. The differences were statistically significant in both cases (p < 0.0001). The odds of being G6PD-deficient were 4.9 [95% CI 0.635-38.00] and 3.9 [95% CI 0.481-31.418] times higher for the Nuer and Anuak ethnic groups compared to the ‘highlanders’, respectively (p < 0.0001) (Table 2). When the G6PDd prevalence for the Nuer and Anuak was compared from within the difference was also significant.
Table 1

Prevalences of G6PDd among outpatients of Gambella hospital, southwest Ethiopia by malaria status, sex and ethnic group, 2013

G6PD

Sex

 

Malaria

Ethnic group

  

N

Positive no (%)

Negative no (%)

Anuak no (%)

Nuer no (%)

Oromo no (%)

Amhara no (%)

Hadya no (%)

Tigre no (%)

Kambata no (%)

Dawuro no (%)

Normal

Male

192

117 (60.9)

75 (39.0)

38 (19.7)

59 (30.7)

22 (11.4)

21 (10.9)

14 (7.3)

16 (8.3)

11 (5.7)

11 (5.7)

 

Female

224

119 (53.1)

105 (46.8)

42 (18.7)

67 (29.9)

24 (10.7)

20 (8.9)

27 (12.0)

10 (4.4)

18 (8.0)

16 (7.1)

Deficient

Male

18

17 (94.4)

1 (5.5)

7 (14.5)

10 (55.5)

00 (0.0)

00 (0.0)

00 (0.0)

00 (0.0)

1 (5.5)

00 (0.0)

 

Female

15

13 (86.7)

2 (13.3)

4 (26.6)

11 (73.3)

00 (0.0)

00 (0.0)

00 (0.0)

00 (0.0)

00 (0.0)

00 (0.0)

Total

 

449

266 (59.2)

183 (40.8)

91 (20.2)

147 (32.7)

46 (10.2)

41 (9.1)

41 (9.1)

26 (5.8)

30 (6.6)

27 (6.0)

p-value

0.354

 

0.000

 

0.000

       
Table 2

Logistic regression analysis of sex and ethnic group for G6PDd among malaria suspect outpatients in Gambella hospital, southwest Ethiopia, 2013

 

Binary logistic regression

Multiple logistic regression

 

UOR (95% CI)

p-value

AOR (95% CI)

p-value

Gender

Female

1

 

1

 

Male

1.4000 (0.678-2.853)

0.354

1.459 (0.669-2.944)

0.371

Ethnic group

Nuer

4.9 (0.635-38.00)

0.000

4.6 (0.589-35.79)

0.000

Anuak

3.9 (0.481-31.418)

0.063

3.7 (0.454-30.08)

0.063

Amhara

0.00

0.059

0.00

0.059

Oromo

0.00

0.044

0.00

0.044

Tigre

0.00

0.139

0.00

0.139

Dawuro

0.00

0.131

0.00

0.131

Hadya

0.00

0.059

0.00

0.059

Kambata

1

 

1

 

G6PDd: glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; AOR: adjusted odds ratio, UOR: unadjusted odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.

While G6PD-deficient males who were malaria smear positive were 94.4% (17/18), females of the same category were 87.6% (13/15). Thirty (90.9%) out of the 33 G6PD-deficient participants were malaria smear positive which was significantly higher than the incidence of malaria among normal individuals for the enzyme (p < 0.0001). However, the mean parasite density of G6DP-deficient individuals (1.64 (±1.55) was significantly lower than that of G6DP-normal individuals (2.97 (±1.22) (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean Hb concentration in G6DP-deficient individuals (14.15 (±3.50) was significantly higher than that of normal ones (12.44 (±2.70) (p = 0.006). Further, the mean HCT of G6PD-deficient individuals (37.86 (±8.609) was significantly higher than that of normal participants (43.13 (±10.54) (p = 0.005). But the mean values of MCV, MCH and MCHC were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3

Mean ± SD parasitaemia, Hb, HCT and RBC indices in relation to G6PD status among malaria suspected outpatients in Gambella hospital, southwest Ethiopia, 2013

G6PD Status

Parasite density/log10 μl

Hb (g/dl)

HCT (%)

MCV (fl)

MCH (pg)

MCHC (%)

Normal

2.97 ± 1.22

12.44 ± 2.70

37.86 ± 8.609

85.51 ± 6.68

26.87 ± 5.58

31.98 ± 2.50

Deficient

1.64 ± 1.55

14.15 ± 3.50

43.13 ± 10.54

85.75 ± 5.84

28.12 ± 4.92

32.43 ± 1.43

p-value

0.000

0.006

0.005

0.834

0.201

0.149

G6PD: glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; Hb: haemoglobin concentration; HCT: haematocrit; MCV: mean corpuscular volume; MCH: mean corpuscular haemoglobin; MCHC: mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration; RBC: red blood cell; SD: standard deviation.

Seven (21.2%), 1 (3.0%), 9 (27.2%) and 7 (21.2%) individuals were macrocytic, microcytic, hypochromic and microcytic-hypochromic, respectively, among the G6PD-deficient (Table 4). From the non-deficient; 31 (7.4%), 4 (0.96%) 78 (18.7%) and 29 (6.7%) were macrocytic, microcytic, hypochromic and microcytic-hypochromic respectively. The differences between the two groups for the respective parameters were significant.
Table 4

Prevalence of various anaemia types and G6PD status among malaria suspect outpatients in Gambella hospital, southwest Ethiopia, 2013/2014

Anaemia type G6PD status

Microcytic no (%)

Macrocytic no (%)

Hypochromic no (%)

Microcytic-hypochromic no (%)

Normal

31 (7.4)

4 (0.96)

78 (18.7)

29 (6.7)

Deficient

7 (21.2)

1 (3.0)

9 (27.2)

7 (21.2)

p- value

0.000

0.316

0.000

0.000

Discussion

In this study, P. falciparum, P. vivax and mixed infections accounted for 96.6, 2.6 and 0.8% of malaria cases, respectively, indicating the overwhelming occurrence of P. falciparum in the study population. This result is comparable to a previous report in the area[21] which was 88.9% for P. falciparum and 11.1% for P. vivax cases. However, the overall malaria prevalence reported by these authors was much lower (13.5%) than that of the current study (59.2%). On the other hand, results from elsewhere in Ethiopia attribute only 60–70% of the cases to P. falciparum and the rest to P. vivax[22, 23]. The high malaria prevalence in this study shows that the disease is a year-round problem in Gambella despite the undergoing control activities and the fact that the survey was conducted outside the peak transmission season. This may suggest that either the control strategies in use are ineffective and/or some specific local predisposing factors to malaria are impacting. Malaria prevalence did not significantly correlate with participant age or sex but ethnic group. The Nuer and Anuak were more frequently infected compared to the ‘highlanders’ combined. Environmental and differences in exposure to infectious mosquito bites, among other things, may account for this apparent difference.

The prevalence of G6PDd was 7.3% in this study. This figure is relatively lower compared to the world health organization (WHO) report for SSA which is as high as 35%[12]. The prevalence of G6PDd significantly varies among different countries and regions or even localities for several reasons[24, 25]. For instance, in southern European countries, such as Greece[26] and Italy[27], G6PDd prevalence ranges from 1–30 and 0–3% respectively. A study in India reported G6PDd prevalence of 27.5% in males and 12.8% in females[28]. G6PDd prevalence in Yemen was 7.1%[29] and in the neighbouring Saudi Arabia it was 9.05%[30]. It is widely believed that isolated populations have higher G6PDd cases[26, 31].

Although the frequency of G6PDd was higher in males (4.0%) than in females (3.3%) in the present study, the difference was not statistically significant. Since the gene of the enzyme is on the X-chromosome and males are hemizygous, a single allele of the gene would suffice to express the deficient phenotype. In light of this, a higher frequency of the deficient phenotype is expected in males than in females. Since females inherit two copies of the X-chromosome and therefore have two populations of red blood cells (RBCs), each expressing one of the two G6PD alleles they carry (homozygous females), two deficient alleles are required to render them G6PD-deficient phenotypically. From this point of view, the present study seems to be contrary to what is theoretically expected. However, diagnosing heterozygote females that express two different RBC populations (normal and deficient) to the enzymatic activity level is highly challenging, as the deficiency can be masked by cells expressing normal activity. G6PDd is relatively reliably detected in males[32, 33] and diagnostics for heterozygous females are altogether more complex and uncertain. That is perhaps why G6PDd in females is underreported in many epidemiological studies. Indeed there are studies that reported a narrow variation of G6PDd prevalence between boys and girls with a p-value just slightly below the 0.05 level[34].

The prevalence of G6PDd significantly varied between ethnic groups in Gambella area; the highest frequency being among the indigenous Nuer and Anuak ethnic groups. This must be taken into account in planning primaquine/tafenoquine use to eliminate malaria especially in the rural areas of Gambella where the natives exclusively reside. A similar study in Nigeria recorded some variation in G6PDd with respect to ethnic affiliation though the effect was not significant possibly due to the relatively small number of non-Yoruba children in the study, as the authors suggested[35]. In a study from India the G6PDd prevalence ranged from 0 to 27% and a clear variation was noted between different castes, tribes and ethnic groups[36].

The significantly higher occurrence of malaria smear positivity among G6PD-deficient individuals, compared to the non-deficient, observed in this study suggests lack of correlation between G6PDd and protection from clinical malaria. But the significantly lower mean parasite density, higher Hb and HCT values among the deficient shows the protective role of G6PDd against severe malaria. In fact, the literature is not concordant regarding the role of G6PDd in malaria. G6PDd was associated with protection against severe malaria in males but not in heterozygous females[37]. Contrarily, others reported the protection of heterozygous females but not the hemi/homozygous with a more severe degree of G6PDd[38]. Still there is evidence for protection from symptomatic malaria for both hemi/homozygous and heterozygous individuals[39]. G6PDd is weakly associated with asymptomatic malaria infection[40, 41]. High malaria parasitaemia and mortality was observed among G6PD-deficient patients in Iran[42]. In another recent study the odds of malaria infection was not significantly lower in children with the deficient phenotype[34]. In vitro studies are equally conflicting[43, 44]. Since G6PD expression is vital for survival of Plasmodium inside the host cell the parasite may synthesize its own G6PD within deficient RBCs[45]. This may partially explain why G6PDd is not associated with protection from malaria at least in some settings including the present one. The method of G6PDd assessment can possibly affect the association studies of malaria susceptibility due to G6PDd[46].

It is well-known that G6PDd contributes to macrocytic, microcytic and hypochromic anaemia. In microchromic anaemia the RBC are usually also hypochromic. Further, rapid RBC turnover from G6PDd haemolysis can trigger mild macrocytosis. This may explain the significantly higher proportion of G6PD-deficent individuals for these different types of anaemia compared to the non-deficient in the present study. However, the results should be interpreted with caution as there are several other causes of macrocytic and other types of anaemia. Multiple factors like nutrition, infection, medication, haemoglobinopathies and overall health status may influence G6PD activity[47]. Since the MCV and MCH values for microcytic (MCV <80 fL), macrocytic (MCV >96 fL) and hypochromic (MCH <27 pg) anaemia are comparable especially with that of thalassaemia[48], it may be misleading to conclude that the asymptomatic G6PDd is responsible for the observation in this study. Although little specific information is available concerning haemoglobinopathies in general, Gambella is part of the global thalassaemia map[49]. Thus, future studies are warranted to clearly understand the role of asymptomatic G6PDd on haematological parameters and malaria in relation to haemoglobinopathies in the study area. Though rapid qualitative tests such as the CareStart™ G6PDd screening tests seem more feasible for mass screening in remote endemic areas genotyping G6PD and various haemoglobinopathies is also necessary to explore the local variants. Overall, comprehensive understanding of the relationship between primaquine/tafenoquine dose and risk of G6PDd-related haemolysis is required to allow deploying or withholding these drugs in future malaria control or eradication plans in the study area and beyond.

Conclusions

G6PDd prevalence as determined by measuring the phenotype (enzyme activity), is considerable among the indigenous Nilotic population. Despite control efforts being made, malaria remains highly prevalent among outpatients in Gambella hospital questioning the efficacy of control strategies in use. There was no significant association between G6PDd and protection from malaria incidence per se. The G6PDd report presented here can contribute to the evidence-base for weighing risk and benefit in formulating primaquine/tafenoquine treatment strategies that could greatly accelerate the elimination of malaria transmission in the study area. Population-based genotyping could be important to identify the distribution of dominant variants in the region.

Limitations of the study

The study did not use quantitative or semi-quantitative screening methods such as spectrophotometric ultraviolet (UV). As a result, the WHO’s five classes (levels) of G6PD activity could not be determined among the study participants. Besides, because of the fact that a molecular method was not used, the underlying prevalent variants and specific mutations in the G6PD-deficient individuals could not be addressed.

Notes

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

EDTA: 

Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid

G6PDd: 

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency

Hb: 

Haemoglobin

HCT: 

Haematocrit, km: kilometer

MCV: 

Mean corpuscular volume

MCH: 

Mean corpuscular haemoglobin

MCHC: 

Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration

μl: 

Micro liter

PCV: 

Packed cell volume

SNNPR: 

Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Region

SSA: 

Sub-Saharan Africa

SPSS: 

Statistical package for social sciences

UK: 

United Kingdom

USA: 

United States of America

UV: 

Ultraviolet

WBC: 

White blood cell

WHO: 

World Health Organization.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to study patients, staff of Gambella hospital and Regional Health Bureau for their kind support. Dr Hyeonsuk Kim, Research and Development Director, Access Bio Inc., USA and Mr Seokje Park, President, Access Bio Inc., Ethiopia are thanked for providing the CareStart™ G6PDd screening kit. The study was financially supported by a seed money obtained from the Medical Research Council (UK - G0600718), and a thematic research fund from Office of Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer, Addis Ababa University.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University
(2)
Jimma University
(3)
Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University
(4)
Armauer Hansen Research Institute

References

  1. WHO: World Malaria Report. 2013, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, [http://www.who.int/malaria]Google Scholar
  2. Mackinnon MJ, Mwangi TW, Snow RW, Marsh K, Williams TN: Heritability of malaria in Africa. PLoS Med. 2005, 2: e340-10.1371/journal.pmed.0020340.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison A: Observational, hypothesis-driven and genomics research strategies for analyzing inherited differences in responses to infectious diseases. Public Health Genomics. 2009, 12: 41-52. 10.1159/000154817.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kwiatkowski DP: How malaria has affected the human genome and what human genetics can teach us about malaria. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 77: 171-192. 10.1086/432519.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lewis R: Human Genetics. 1997, Chicago, IL: Wm. C. Brown publishersGoogle Scholar
  6. Carson PE, Flanagan CL, Ickes CE, Alving AS: Enzymatic deficiency in primaquine-sensitive erythrocytes. Science. 1956, 124: 484-485.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. White NJ: Primaquine to prevent transmission of falciparum malaria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012, 13: 175-181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. White NJ: Determinants of relapse periodicity in Plasmodium vivax malaria. Malar J. 2011, 10: 297-10.1186/1475-2875-10-297.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shanks GD, Oloo AJ, Aleman GM, Ohrt C, Klotz FW, Braitman D, Horton J, Brueckner R: A new primaquine analogue, tafenoquine (WR 238605), for prophylaxis against Plasmodium falciparum malaria". Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 33: 1968-1974. 10.1086/324081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Howes RE, Dewi M, Pie FB, Monteiro WM, Battle KE, Messina JP, Sakuntabhai A, Satyagraha AW, Williams TN, Baird JK, Hay SI: Spatial distribution of G6PD deficiency variants across malaria-endemic regions. Malar J. 2013, 12: 418-10.1186/1475-2875-12-418.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Howes RE, Battle KE, Satyagraha AW, Baird JK, Hay SI: G6PD deficiency: global distribution, genetic variants and primaquine therapy. Adv Parasitol. 2013, 81: 133-201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. WHO Working Group: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Bull World Health Organ. 1989, 67: 601-611.Google Scholar
  13. WHO: Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 2010, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2Google Scholar
  14. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Authority: 2007 Population and Housing census of Ethiopia. [http://unstats.un.org/unsd/censuskb20/Attachment489.aspx]
  15. World Weather Online. [http://www.worldweatheronline.com/Gambella-weather-averages/ET.aspx]
  16. UNICEF: Livelihoods and vulnerabilities study in Gambella Region of Ethiopia. 2006, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambela_Region]Google Scholar
  17. FMoH: National five-year strategic plan for malaria prevention and control in Ethiopia. 2006, [http://www.cdbph.org/documents], –2010Google Scholar
  18. Krafsur ES, Armstrong JC: Epidemology of Plasmodium malaria infection in Gambella. Parasitologia. 1982, 24: 105-120.Google Scholar
  19. Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S: Sample size determination in health science studies: A practical manual. 1991, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  20. WHO: Basic Malaria Microscopy. Part I Learners Guide. 2010, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2Google Scholar
  21. Nigatu W, Abebe M, Dejene A: Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum epidemiology in Gambella, south-west Ethiopia. Trop Med Parasitol. 1992, 43: 181-185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Deressa W, Ali A, Enqusellassie F: Self-treatment of malaria in rural communities, Butajira, Southern Ethiopia. Bull World Health Organ. 2003, 81: 261-268.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jima D, Gezahagne T, Deressa W, Woyissa A, Daniel K, Desta A: Baseline survey for the implementation of insecticide treated mosquito nets in malaria. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2005, 19: 16-23.Google Scholar
  24. Rodrigues MO, Freire AP, Martins G, Pereira J, Martins MD, Monteiro C: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in Portugal: biochemical and mutational profiles, heterogeneity, and haplotype association. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2002, 28: 249-259. 10.1006/bcmd.2002.0505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sukumar S, Mukherjee MB, Colah RB, Mohanty D: Molecular basis of G6PD deficiency in India. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2004, 33: 141-145. 10.1016/j.bcmd.2004.06.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Missiou-Tsagaraki S: Screening for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency as a preventive measure: prevalence among 1,286,000 Greek newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1991, 119: 293-299. 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80747-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Maffi D, Pasquino MT, Mandarino L, Tortora P, Girelli G, Meo D, Grazzini G, Caprari P: Glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in Italian blood donors: prevalence and molecular defect characterization. Vox Sanguinis. 2014, 106: 227-233. 10.1111/vox.12096.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupte SC, Shaw AN, Shah KC: Hematological findings and severity of G6PD deficiency in Vataliya Prajapati subjects. J Assoc Physicians India. 2005, 53: 1027-1030.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Al-Nood HA, Bazara FA, Al-Absi R, Habori MA: Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase deficiency among male blood donors in Sana’a city, Yemen. Oman Med J. 2012, 27: 46-49. 10.5001/omj.2012.09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Warsy AS, El-Hazmi MA: G6PD deficiency, distribution and variants in Saudi Arabia: an overview. Ann Saudi Med. 2001, 21: 174-177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Meloni T, Forteleoni G, Meloni GF: Marked decline of favism after neonatal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase screening and health education: the northern Sardinian experience. Acta Haematol. 1992, 87: 29-31. 10.1159/000204709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. The malERA Consultative Group on Diagnoses Diagnostics: A research agenda for malaria eradication: diagnoses and diagnostics. PLoS Med. 2011, 8: e1000396-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Douglas NM, Nosten F, Ashley EA, Phaiphun L, van Vugt M, Singhasivanon P, White NJ, Price RN: Plasmodium vivax recurrence following falciparum and mixed species malaria: risk factors and effect of antimalarial kinetics. Clin Infect Dis. 2011, 52: 612-620. 10.1093/cid/ciq249.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Okebe J, Amambua-Ngwa A, Parr J, Nishimura S, Daswani M, Takem EN, Affara M, Ceesay SJ, Nwakanma D, Alessandro UD: The prevalence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in Gambian school children. Malar J. 2014, 13: 148-10.1186/1475-2875-13-148.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams O, Gbadero D, Edowhorhu G, Brearley A, Slusher T, Lund TC: Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency in Nigerian Children. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8: e68800-10.1371/journal.pone.0068800.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Balgir RS: Ethnic and regional variations in the red cell glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in India. Indian J Haematol Blood Transfus. 1989, 7: 101-Google Scholar
  37. Guindo A, Fairhurst RM, Doumbo OK, Wellems TE, Diallo DA: X-linked G6PD deficiency protects hemizygous males but not heterozygous females against severe malaria. PLoS Med. 2007, 4: e66-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040066.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kar S, Seth S, Seth PK: Prevalence of malaria in Ao Nagas and its association with G6PD and HbE. Hum Biol. 1992, 64: 187-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruwende C, Khoo SC, Snow RW, Yates SN, Kwiatkowski D, Gupta S, Warn P, Allsopp CE, Gilbert SC, Peschu N, Newbold CI, Greenwood BM, Marsh K, Hill AVS: Natural selection of hemi- and heterozygotes for G6PD deficiency in Africa by resistance to severe malaria. Nature. 1995, 376: 246-249. 10.1038/376246a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tine RC, Ndiaye M, Hansson HH, Ndour CT, Faye B, Alifrangis M, Sylla K, Ndiaye JL, Magnussen P, Bygbjerg IC, Gaye O: The association between malaria parasitaemia, erythrocyte polymorphisms, malnutrition and anaemia in children less than 10 years in Senegal: a case control study. BMC Res Notes. 2012, 5: 565-10.1186/1756-0500-5-565.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Vafa M, Troye-Blomberg M, Anchang J, Garcia A, Migot-Nabias F: Multiplicity of Plasmodium falciparum infection in asymptomatic children in Senegal: relation to transmission, age and erythrocyte variants. Malar J. 2008, 7: 17-10.1186/1475-2875-7-17.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nateghpour M, Miahipour A, Yousefi M, Mohammadiha A, Fagani Y: A Patient with G6PD Deficiency and Falciparum Malaria, Case report. Iranian J Parasitol. 2007, 2: 43-45.Google Scholar
  43. Pasvol G, Wilson RJM: The interaction of malaria parasites with red blood cells. Br Med Bull. 1982, 38: 133-140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Friedman MJ: Oxidant damage mediates variant red cell resistance to malaria. Nature. 1979, 280: 245-10.1038/280245a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yoshida A, Roth EFJ: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase of malaria parasite P. falciparum. Blood. 1989, 69: 1528-30.Google Scholar
  46. Johnson MK, Clark TD, Njama-Meya D, Rosenthal PJ, Parikh S: Impact of the method of G6PD deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e7246-10.1371/journal.pone.0007246.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Luzzatto L, Poggi V: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Nathan and Oski's Hematology of Infancy and Childhood. Edited by: Orkin SH, Fisher DE, Thomas Look A, Lux ISE, Ginsburg D, Nathan DG. 2009, Philadelphia: Sanders, 884-911. 7Google Scholar
  48. Mehdi SR, Al Dahmash BA: A comparative study of hematological parameters of α and β thalassemias in a high prevalence zone: Saudi Arabia. Indian J Hum Genet. 2011, 17: 207-211. 10.4103/0971-6866.92106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Genes and Human Disease. [http://www.who.int/genomics/public/geneticdiseases/en/index2.html]

Copyright

© Tsegaye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement