Skip to main content

Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria in Debre Zeit, Ethiopia



Plasmodium vivax accounts for about 40% of all malaria infection in Ethiopia. Chloroquine (CQ) is the first line treatment for confirmed P. vivax malaria in the country. The first report of CQ treatment failure in P. vivax was from Debre Zeit, which suggested the presence of chloroquine resistance.


An in vivo drug efficacy study was conducted in Debre Zeit from June to August 2006. Eighty-seven patients with microscopically confirmed P. vivax malaria, aged between 8 months and 52 years, were recruited and treated under supervision with CQ (25 mg/kg over three days). Clinical and parasitological parameters were assessed during the 28 day follow-up period. CQ and desethylchloroquine (DCQ) blood and serum concentrations were determined with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in patients who showed recurrent parasitaemia.


Of the 87 patients recruited in the study, one was lost to follow-up and three were excluded due to P. falciparum infection during follow-up. A total of 83 (95%) of the study participants completed the follow-up. On enrolment, 39.8% had documented fever and 60.2% had a history of fever. The geometric mean parasite density of the patients was 7045 parasites/μl. Among these, four patients had recurrent parasitaemia on Day 28. The blood CQ plus DCQ concentrations of these four patients were all above the minimal effective concentration (> 100 ng/ml).


Chloroquine-resistant P. vivax parasites are emerging in Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. A multi-centre national survey is needed to better understand the extent of P. vivax resistance to CQ in Ethiopia.


Plasmodium vivax malaria is the most geographically widespread and the second prevalent cause of malaria globally. Among 2.6 billion people at risk of malaria infection, annual estimates of P. vivax cases range from 130 to 435 million [1], 90% of these infections occur outside Africa [2]. Ethiopia has the highest proportion of P. vivax malaria on the continent, accounting for approximately 40% of all infection in the country [3].

Chloroquine (CQ) is the first line treatment for P. vivax malaria in most parts of the world. However, CQ resistance in P. vivax has compromised its use since the first reported cases from Papua New Guinea in 1989 [4]. Since then, cases of resistance have been reported from places such as Indonesia, island of Nias, in Papua and Irian Jaya in 1991 [5], Myanmar in 1993 and 1995 [6, 7], India in 1995 [8], Borneo in 1996 [9], and in south America; Guyana in 1996 [10], and parts of the Amazon Brazil [1113], Columbia in 2001 [14], Vietnam in 2002 [15], and Peru in 2003 [16]. Resistance has also been reported from two areas in Turkey in 2004 [17]. To date prevalence as high as 84% of CQ-resistant P. vivax has been reported from the north-eastern coast of Indonesian Papua in 2003 [18].

CQ has also been the first line drug in Ethiopia for uncomplicated malaria since 1950. Following the findings of CQ treatment failure as high as 65% for P. falciparum in studies conducted at 18 sites between 1997/98 [19], sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) was introduced as a first line drug treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in 1999 [20]. SP was replaced by artemether/lumefantrine (AL) five years later after a study conducted in 2003 in 11 sites showed 35.9% treatment failure at day 7 and 71.7% on day 28. The efficacy of AL was reported to be 99.1% in 2004, when it replaced SP [21]. However, CQ continued to be in use as first line drug for vivax malaria.

The first report of P. falciparun and P. vivax CQ treatment failure in Debre Zeit, was in 1995, when only 4 of 29 (14%) P. falciparum patients cleared their asexual parasites by day 7 and 2% of 225 P. vivax patients who were followed for seven days failed to respond to CQ treatment [22]. Malaria is one of the most frequently diagnosed acute illnesses and a principal cause of morbidity affecting all age groups in Debre Zeit. Transmission occurs throughout the year with P. vivax being more prevalent (70%) than P. falciparum (30%). Malaria transmission is generally more intense following the main rainy season, which occurs from September to December. The aim of the present study was to determine the rate of CQ treatment failure in P. vivax and confirm whether treatment failure is due to drug resistance or sub-therapeutic antimalarial drug concentrations.


Study site

The study was conducted in Debre Zeit, the capital town of Adea Liben district, which covers an area of approximately 1,635 km2. It is located in Oromia region (Figure 1), Central Ethiopia and is about 45 km from Addis Ababa. An estimated population of 367,534 people live in this area [23]. Its altitude ranges from 1,500–2,200 m asl. It has a short rainy season from March to April and a long rainy season from June to September. The average annual rainfall recorded for the 10 years period (1996–2006) was 84.4 mm, while maximum and minimum temperatures over the same period were 28.6°C and 12.9°C, respectively [24].

Figure 1
figure 1

Map of the study site.

There is one malaria centre where people with symptoms suggestive of malaria obtain free services for malaria diagnosis and treatment. Recruitment and follow-up for the present study was done at this centre.

Sample size calculation

The sample size was calculated based on the expected proportion of P. vivax treatment failures with CQ in the study population. Assuming a maximum of 5% treatment failure in a population, a precision of 5%, and a 5% significance level, the formula, N = (Z/d)2 P (1-P) was used for calculation. Assuming a loss-to-follow-up rate of 20% over a 28-day study, a total of 87 study participants were enrolled.

Patient enrolment, follow-up and treatment

Patients were recruited according to the WHO protocol for monitoring anti-malarial drug resistance [25]. Patients aged between eight months and 52 years with symptoms suggestive of malaria illness, attending the malaria centre at Debre Zeit were screened for malaria infection using thick blood film. Those with P. vivax mono-infection with ≥250 parasites/μl of blood and elevated axillary temperature (≥37.5°C) or a history of fever within the previous 48 hours and who gave informed consent, or parent's or guardian's consent and assent (for children aged 12–17 years) were enrolled in the study. Patients were excluded if they had signs of severe malaria according to WHO criteria [26], had another obvious cause for their fever, had a history of allergy to CQ or lived outside the study area.

Following the treatment guidelines of the Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia (FMOH), 25 mg/kg of chloroquine phosphate (Batch Number 0073; Adigrat Pharmaceutical Factory, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia) was administered over a 3-day period (10 mg/kg on days 0 and 1 and 5 mg/kg on day 2) [27]. All drug doses were administered under the supervision of a member of the research team. The study participants were observed in case they vomited within 30 minutes of ingesting the drugs. Those who vomited the first dose were re-treated with a similar dose, while those who vomited twice were excluded from the study. Patients with axillary temperatures ≥ 38°C were treated with paracetamol (10 mg/kg). Patients who failed to respond to CQ treatment during the 28 days of follow-up were treated with oral quinine (8 mg/kg per day for seven days). The study participants were asked to return for follow-up evaluation on days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28. Patients were encouraged to come back to the centre if they felt ill at any time during the follow-up period. Thick and thin blood films were prepared at times of all follow-up visits and additional blood samples were collected on filter paper at day 2 and any day after day 3 when patients had shown recurrent parasitaemia, for determination of serum CQ and DCQ concentrations. Patients who did not return to the malaria centre for follow-up assessment were traced to their homes.

Treatment success was defined as clearance of parasitaemia with no reappearance within the 28 days of follow-up period. Treatment failure due to CQ resistance was defined as parasitaemia recurred during the follow-up period in the presence of therapeutic concentrations of CQ and DCQ (i.e ≥ 100 ng/ml as determined using HPLC) [25, 28].

The study was approved by the Addis Ababa University Ethical Review Committee, the AHRI/ALERT Ethical Review Committee and the National Ethical Review Committee.

Laboratory analyses

Giemsa staining of thick and thin blood film and parasite density determination

Thick and thin blood film slides were prepared using 10% Giemsa solution for 30 min. The stained slides were examined under a light microscope using 100× oil immersion by an experienced laboratory technician. Parasitaemia was calculated per 200 white blood cells (WBC) assuming 8000 WBC/μl of blood [29]. A total of 300 fields were examined before a blood smear was considered negative. Ten percent of the slides were read by a second laboratory technician for quality control.

Drug quality assay

Drug disintegration, dissolution, identification and assay tests were done to assess the quality of the drug used in the study (chloroquine phosphate 250 mg containing 150 mg of chloroquine base, Batch Number 0073, Adigrat Pharmaceutical Factory, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). The tested batch of CQ tablets was determined as per the British Pharmacopoeia (BP) [30].

Determination of CQ-DCQ concentrations on filter paper adsorbed blood

Blood concentrations of CQ and DCQ were measured using the HPLC method described by Bell et al [31], with some minor modifications for use in filter paper adsorbed blood samples. Quinidine (internal standard; 200 ng (20 μl of 10 ng/ml solution in methanol) was added to the blood sample spot (50 μl) adsorbed on Whatman filter paper (17 CHR) and allowed to dry at 37°C. The filter paper strips were cut into small pieces and put into labelled silanized pyrex glass PTFE-lined screw-cap tubes. Hydrochloric acid (2 M; 1 ml) was added, and the tubes vortexed for 10 seconds. Sodium hydroxide solution (5 M; 1 ml) was added, and the tubes vortexed for 10 seconds, followed by addition of the extracting solvent (tert-butyl methyl ether: n-hexane; 5 ml). The contents were mixed by mechanically inverting the tubes for 30 minutes using a tube rotor (Stuart STR4 rotator drive; Stuart Scientific, UK). The samples were then centrifuged (3000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C) to separate the phases. The upper organic phase was carefully transferred to a fresh silanized tube and evaporated to dryness at 37°C in a water bath under a gentle stream of white spot nitrogen gas (BOC Kenya Ltd, Nairobi). The extracted drug was reconstituted using mobile phase (100 μl) and an aliquot (50 μl) was injected onto the HPLC column. The mobile phase consisted of water and acetonitrile (90%: 10%; v/v) containing 1% (v/v) triethylamine, with pH adjusted to 2.8 with orthophosphoric acid.

The chromatographic system consisted of a gradient delivery pump (Spectra System P2000, Spectra Physics Analytical Inc. CA USA) connected to a syringe loading injector (Rheodyne Model 7125, CA USA) equipped with a 50-μl loop. Chromatographic separation was performed using a stainless steel analytical column (Synergi 4 μ Polar-RP 80Ä; 150 mm × 4.6 mm; Phenomenex®, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK), preceded by a guard column (LiChroCart Lichrospher® RP-18e; 10 mmx 4.6 mm; 5 μm; Darmstadt, Germany). A variable wavelength UV-visible detector (Spectra Series® UV100; Spectra Physics Analytical Inc., CA, USA) set at 340 nm was used. Chromatographic data were recorded on a ChromoJet CH1 data integrator (Spectra Physics Thermo Separation Products, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data was double entered using Excel 2000 and was verified using Epi info 3.4 (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA). STATA version 7.0 (Stat Corp., College station, TX, USA) was used for analysis. The survival analysis method of in vivo test was used. In this method patients who were excluded from the study due to P. falciparum infection or lost-to-follow-up during the course of the project were included in the analysis as non-treatment failure cases. Failure rate was derived from cumulative incidence of failure at day 28. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used in non-parametric comparisons, to determine the level of significant difference, p < 0.05 was taken as significant.


Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants

A total of 2,422 consecutive patients self-reported to have symptoms of malaria, 87 patients who satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria were recruited. The median age of study participants was 16 years (range: 8 months to 52 years). Twenty point seven percent (n = 18) of the study participants were under five years of age. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) for duration of illness was 3.15 ± 1.85 days. Among the study participants, 62.1% had a history of fever and 37.9% had documented fever at the time of diagnosis. The geometric mean parasite density at day 0 was 6,614.6 parasites/μl (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of patients enrolled in the in vivo efficacy test of chloroquine in P. vivax malaria from June-August 2006, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.

Symptoms such as fever, headache, chills/rigor, back pain, vomiting, myalgia, poor appetite, abdominal pain, cough, diarrhoea and joint pain were reported by the patients at the time of recruitment. Among these, the major ones were fever (96.5%), headache (86.2%) and chills/rigor (78%). Seven percent (n = 7) of the study participants vomited the first dose of CQ and they were retreated with a similar dose. None of them vomited a second time.

Treatment response

Among the 87 study participants, three patients were excluded from the study due to P. falciparum infection during follow-up. One was found positive for asexual stages of P. falciparum on day 21 and the other two were positive for P. falciparum gametocytes on day 1 and 3. Only one participant was lost to follow-up while the remaining 83 study participants completed the 28-day follow-up.

Based on therapeutic failure risk calculated by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the number of patients at risk on day 0 was 87 and these fell to 83 at day 28. Among the 83 patients, 42% (n = 35) had cleared their parasitaemia by day 1 and 98% (n = 81) by day 3 while 100% parasite clearance was observed by day 7. However, 4.6% (n = 4) of CQ treatment failure was observed during the follow-up period. This was observed in four children below seven years of age who developed symptomatic recurrent parasitaemia at day 28. This puts the risk of CQ failure on day 28 at 4.6% (Table 2).

Table 2 Estimates of risk of therapeutic failure of chloroquine in treatment of P. vivax, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.

Though the day 0 parasite density of patients with recurrent parasitaemia was high, the difference failed to reach statistical significance (Wilcoxon rank sum test p = 0.061) observed from the parasitic density observed at day 0 in the patients who cleared their parasitaemia.

Blood concentration of CQ plus DCQ

To monitor CQ absorption, CQ plus DCQ (CQ-DCQ) serum concentration of 83 samples (four patients with recurrent parasitaemia and 79 patients with treatment success) was determined on day 2. The median CQ-DCQ concentration was 882.3 ng/ml (range: 166.8–6714.6 ng/ml). There was no significant difference observed in the CQ-DCQ concentration at day 2 between the patients who showed recurrent parasitaemia and patients who had cleared their parasitaemia within the 28 days follow-up period (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.52).

In order to confirm the cause of clinical treatment failure observed in the present study, blood drug concentration of CQ-DCQ was determined. The concentrations of CQ-DCQ in the blood at day 28 for patients who showed recurrent parasitaemia were all above the minimal effective concentration (MEC, 100 ng/ml) (Table 3). Furthermore, CQ and DCQ concentrations above MEC were also measured for samples of three patients who had shown adequate response to CQ treatment (Table 4).

Table 3 Chloroquine (CQ) plus desethylchloroquine (DCQ) concentration in the blood of P. vivax malaria patients with recurrent parasitaemia, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia, 2006.
Table 4 Chloroquine (CQ) plus desethylchloroquine (DCQ) concentration in the blood of P. vivax malaria patients who have adequate clinical and parasitological response, Debre Zeit, 2006.

PCR was run on five paired samples (four from patients who had shown recurrent parasitaemia and one patient who had cleared parasitaemia during the follow-up period). However, it was only possible to amplify five isolates: four day 0 samples and one day 28 sample using primers published by Bruce et al [32]. Comparison of day 0 and day 28 samples was only possible for one patient showing the existence of two parasite populations in which one strain was not detected from samples that were collected at the time of recruitment.


According to the WHO protocol, resistance is defined as the presentation of signs of severe malaria within the first two days after supervised treatment or the presence of parasitaemia and axillary temperature > 37.5°C between day 3 and 28 or presence of parasitaemia on any day between day 7 and day 28, irrespective of clinical conditions [25]. In addition, evidence of CQ-DCQ concentrations above the minimal effective concentration (MEC) in the blood demonstrates the presence of resistance regardless of the origin of the parasite; whether it relapses from liver or is a recrudescence from blood stage [28, 33]. In line with this definition, the present study provides evidence for the existence of CQ resistance in P. vivax in Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. This was confirmed with a quantitative analysis of the blood concentrations of CQ-DCQ, which were above MEC (100 ng/ml of blood). In addition, the presence of CQ-DCQ concentrations on day 2 (median = 882.3 ng/ml; range: 166.8–6714.6 ng/ml) showed that CQ was well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract indicating that there were no other factors that might have influenced the kinetics of the drug including rapid excretion or poor absorption. Although only three samples from patients with successful treatment response were tested, blood concentrations of CQ-DCQ of these patients were above the MEC, which is in accord with a previous report by Baird et al [28].

This is the first report of CQ resistance in P. vivax from Africa. A previous report by Tulu et al in Debre Zeit has showed the presence of 2% (255) treatment failures in using seven days in vivo efficacy test [20]. However, serum drug concentrations were not determined in order to confirm drug resistance.

In addition to the determination of drug concentrations in patient blood samples, molecular genotyping is recommended in studies of anti-malarial drug efficacy [25]. This method is used to distinguish between relapse/recrudescence and re-infection in P. vivax. In present study, msp 3-alpha was used to genotype P. vivax isolates from patients who showed parasitaemia. The primers failed to amplify parasite isolates which could be due to the mismatch at the 3' end of the primers, thus not attached to the parasite DNA which, lead to an inconclusive result for the genotype. One limitation of this study is that it did not explore other marker genes, including Pvcsp and Pvmsp1, which had been applied elsewhere for genotyping in P. vivax parasite isolates to obtain additional information on the diversity of the resistant isolates [34].

Though genotyping is recommended in differentiating relapse/recrudescence and re-infection, it has shortcomings when used for P. vivax as this method assumes that the primary parasite population is the same as in recurrent parasitaemia due to relapse [35]. However, recent studies from three different countries have shown the presence of heterologous hypnozoites in the liver [36] in which a single allelic type of hypnozoite is being activated at a time [37], thus leading to misclassification of a recrudescence as a new infection. In addition, this assumption does not take into account the possibility of few strains circulating at low parasite density that cannot be detected in primary samples but could emerge to cause treatment failure, which again leads to misclassification of the treatment response [33]. Moreover, lack of a standardized classification of the outcome in categorizing mixed genotypes as recrudescence or re-infection is another limitation of this method. Therefore, in order to detect the emergence of drug resistance in P. vivax, clinical follow-up in combination with determination of CQ-DCQ concentrations in the blood at a time of recurrent parasitaemia will give a definitive diagnosis rather than follow-up in combination with genotyping. Since mixed parasite strains were observed in day 28 samples, when compared to day 0 sample, it was difficult to categorize as recrudescence/relapse from new infection.

In Ethiopia, there is a surveillance system for assessing the efficacy of first line drug for the treatment of P. falciparum. However, there have been no systematic studies for P. vivax. The present data confirmed the emergence CQ resistant P. vivax in the Debre Zeit. Even though the level of resistance is not so high as to require a treatment policy change, the finding will be useful in alerting the responsible authorities to monitor the level of drug resistance and to determine the extent of this problem in all parts of the country, bearing in mind that P. vivax malaria is responsible for 40% of malaria cases in Ethiopia.


Chloroquine-resistant P. vivax parasites are emerging in Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. There is a need for regular monitoring of the pattern of resistance to antimalarial drugs in the country.


  1. Guerra CA, Snow RW, Hay SI: Mapping the global extent of malaria in 2005. Trends Parasitol. 2006, 22: 353-358. 10.1016/

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mendis K, Sina BJ, Marchesini P, Richard C: The neglected burden of Plasmodium vivax malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 64: 97-106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Federal Ministry of Health: National Five Years Strategic Plan for Malaria Control in Ethiopia: 2001–2005. 2005, Malaria and Other Vector-borne Diseases Prevention and Control Team, Diseases Prevention and Control Department, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rieckmann KH, Davis DR, Hutton DC: Plasmodium vivax resistant to chloroquine?. Lancet. 1989, 2: 1183-1184. 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91792-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baird JK, Basri H, Purnomo , Bangs MJ, Subianto B, Patchen LC, Hoffman SL: Resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax in Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 44: 547-552.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Myat Phone K, Myint O, Myint L, Thaw Z, Kyin HA, Nwe NY: Emergence of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax in Myanmar (Burma). Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 87: 687-10.1016/0035-9203(93)90294-Z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marlar T, Myat PK, Aye YS, Khaing KG, Ma S, Mind O: Development of resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax in Myanmar. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995, 89: 307-308. 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90556-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dua VK, Kar PK, Sharma VP: Chloroquine resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria in India. Trop Med Int Health. 1996, 1: 816-819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fryauff DJ, Tuti S, Mardi A, Masbar S, Patipelohi R, Leksana B, Kain KC, Bangs MJ, Richie TL, Baird JK: Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax in transmigration settlements of West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 59: 513-518.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips EJ, Keystone JS, Kain KC: Failure of combined chloroquine and high-dose primaquine therapy for Plasmodium vivax malaria acquired in Guyana, South America. Clin Infect Dis. 1996, 23: 1171-1173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alecrim MG, Alecrim W, Macedo V: Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine (R2) and mefloquine (R3) in Brazilian Amazon region. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1999, 32: 67-68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Villalobos-Salcedo JM, Tada MS, Kimura E, Menezes MJ, Pereira da Silva LH: In-vivo sensitivity of Plasmodium vivax isolates from Rond nia (western Amazon region, Brazil) to regimens including chloroquine and primaquine. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2000, 94: 749-758. 10.1080/00034980020027960.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Santana Filho FS, Arcanjo AR, Chehuan YM, Costa MR, Martinez-Espinosa FE, Vieira JL, Barbosa MG, Alecrim WD, Alecrim MG: Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax, Brazilian Amazon. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007, 13: 1125-1126.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Soto J, Toledo J, Gutierrez P, Luzz M, Llinas N, Cedeno N, Dunne M, Berman J: Plasmodium vivax clinically resistant to chloroquine in Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 65: 90-93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Phan GT, de Vries PJ, Tran BQ, Le HQ, Nguyen NV, Nguyen TV, Heisterkamp SH, Kager PA: Artemisinin or chloroquine for blood stage Plasmodium vivax malaria in Vietnam. Trop Med Int Health. 2002, 7: 858-864. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00948.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruebush TK, Zegarra J, Cairo J, Andersen EM, Green M, Pillai DR, Marquino W, Huilca M, Arevalo E, Garcia C, Solary L, Kain KC: Chloroquine resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria in Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 69: 548-552.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurcer MA, Simsek Z, Zeyrek FY, Atay S, Celik H, Kat I, Topluoglu A: Efficacy of chloroquine in the treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria in Turkey. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2004, 98: 447-451. 10.1179/000349804225021343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sumawinata IW, Bernadeta BL, Awalludin S, Purnomo B, Subianto S, Fryauff DJ, Baird JK: Very high risk of therapeutic failure with chloroquine for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax malaria in Indonesian Papua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 416-420.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. WHO: The use of antimalarial drugs. Reports of WHO informal consultation. WHO/CDS/RBM/2001. 33: 34-35.

  20. Jima D, Tesfaye G, Medhin A, Kebede A, Aragaw D, Babaniyi O: Efficacy of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ethiopia. East Afr Med J. 2005, 82 (8): 391-395.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jima D, Tesfaye G, Medhin A, Kebede A, Aragaw D, Babaniyi O: Safety and efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ethiopia. East Afr Med J. 2005, 82 (8): 387-390.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tulu NA, Webbeg RH, Schellenberg JA, Bradley DJ: Failure of chloroquine treatment for malaria in the highlands of Ethiopia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996, 90: 556-557. 10.1016/S0035-9203(96)90322-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Central Statistics Agency: Estimate of population size by sex, area and density by region, zone and woreda, July 2007 based on census done in 1994. 2006, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Meteorology Agency: Monthly data of rainfall and temperature from 1996–2006 of Debre Zeit. 2008, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  25. WHO: Monitoring anti-malarial drug resistance. 2002, Report of a WHO Consultation Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  26. WHO: Management of severe malaria. 2002, Practical Hand Book, 2

    Google Scholar 

  27. FMOH: Malaria diagnosis and treatment guidelines for health workers in Ethiopia. 2004, Addis Ababa, 2

    Google Scholar 

  28. Baird JK, Leksana B, Masbar S, Suradi , Sutanihardja MA, Fryauff DJ, Subianto B: Diagnosis of resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax: timing of recurrence and whole blood chloroquine levels. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997, 56: 621-626.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheesbourgh M: District Laboratory practice in Tropical countries. 2000, Gapsons papers Ltd, NOIDA, II: 2

    Google Scholar 

  30. British Pharmacopoeia commission: British pharmacopoeia. 2004, II:

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bell DJ, Nyirongo SK, Molyneux ME, Winstanley PA, Ward SA: Practical HPLC methods for the quantitative determination of common antimalarials in Africa. J Chromatogr B. 2007, 847: 231-236. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.10.020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bruce CM, Galinsky RM, Barnwell JW, Snounou G, Day KP: Polymorphism at merozoite surface protein-3a locus of Plasmodium vivax: global and local diversity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 61: 518-525.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Baird JK: Minireview: chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium vivax. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 4075-4083. 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4075-4083.2004.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Imwong M, Pukrittayakamee S, Grüner AC, Rénia L, Letourneur F, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Snounou G: Practical PCR genotyping protocols for Plasmodium vivax using Pvcs and Pvmsp1. Malaria J. 2005, 4: 20-10.1186/1475-2875-4-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Craig AA, Kain KC: Molecular analysis of strains of Plasmodium vivax from paired primary and relapse infections. J Infect Dis. 1996, 174: 373-379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Imwong M, Snounou G, Pukrittayakamee S, Tanomsing N, Kim JR, Nandy A, Guthmann JP, Nosten F, Carlton J, Looareesuwan S, Nair S, Sudimack D, Day NP, Anderson TJ, White NJ: Relapses of Plasmodium vivax infection usually result from activation of heterologous hypnozoites. J Infect Dis. 2007, 195: 927-933. 10.1086/512241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen N, Auliff A, Rieckmann K, Gatton M, Cheng Q: Relapses of Plasmodium vivax infection result from clonal hypnozoites activated at predetermined intervals. J Infect Dis. 2007, 195: 934-941. 10.1086/512242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are very grateful to the study participants for their cooperation and the health management and working staff of Debre Zeit Malaria Centre, especially Dr. Tesfaye Dadi, Mrs Biritu Bekele and Mr Tenkolu Degefa for making the follow-up study successful.

We would also like to thank the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (Kilifi, Kenya) for permission to carry out the chromatographic drug assays at their Pharmacology Laboratory and for the training on HPLC method development and validation. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Drug Administration and Control Authority of Ethiopia (DACA), administration and staff for giving permission to conduct the drug quality control study at their laboratory and Mr. Bekele Teffera for his technical support in the laboratory. We would also like to thank Mr Tesfaye Birhanu for performing the quality control reading of the malaria slides and Mr Ambachew Medhin for sharing his previous experience in the field.

This project received support from AHRI core funds (Norad and SIDA/SAREC) and the Addis Ababa University. AHRI also received institutional strengthening grant (Number: TDR A 40048 A0 from MIM/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Program for

Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiwot Teka.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

HT was involved in all aspects of the project, data collection, analysis, interpretation, supervising the project at the study site, and determined CQ-DCQ concentrations using HPLC and in writing of the manuscript. BP, LY, HE, AA have made a contribution in the design, data interpretation, work supervision and in critically revising the manuscript. GT has made a contribution in identifying the problem and on the concept of the study. SM has assisted in conducting the HPLC method validation and determination of CQ-DCQ concentrations in the patients' blood samples, and helped in the analysis of the results. GK has facilitated the HPLC laboratory work at the Kenyan Medical Research Institute. IE has contributed ideas for the project and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teka, H., Petros, B., Yamuah, L. et al. Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria in Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. Malar J 7, 220 (2008).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: