- Open Access
Evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity
© Diallo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 09 April 2008
- Accepted: 02 December 2008
- Published: 02 December 2008
Malaria parasite infectivity to mosquitoes has been measured in a variety of ways and setting, includind direct feeds of and/or membrane feeding blood collected from randomly selected or gametocytemic volunteers. Anopheles gambiae s.l is the main vector responsible of Plasmodium falciparum transmission in Bancoumana and represents about 90% of the laboratory findings, whereas Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale together represent only 10%.
Materials and methods
Between August 1996 and December 1998, direct and membrane feeding methods were compared for the infectivity of children and adolescent gametocyte carriers to anopheline mosquitoes in the village of Bancoumana in Mali. Gametocyte carriers were recruited twice a month through a screening of members of 30 families using Giemsa-stained thick blood smears. F1 generation mosquitoes issued from individual female wild mosquitoes from Bancoumana were reared in a controlled insectary conditions and fed 5% sugar solution in the laboratory in Bamako, until the feeding day when they are starved 12 hours before the feeding experiment. These F1 generation mosquitoes were divided in two groups, one group fed directly on gametocyte carriers and the other fed using membrane feeding method.
Results from 372 Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriers showed that children aged 4–9 years were more infectious than adolescents (p = 0.039), especially during the rainy season. Data from 35 carriers showed that mosquitoes which were used for direct feeding were about 1.5 times more likely to feed (p < 0.001) and two times more likely to become infected, if they fed (p < 0.001), than were those which were used for membrane feeding. Overall, infectivity was about three-times higher for direct feeding than for membrane feeding (p < 0.001).
Although intensity of infectivity was lower for membrane feeding, it could be a surrogate to direct feeding for evaluating transmission-blocking activity of candidate malaria vaccines. An optimization of the method for future trials would involve using about three-times more mosquitoes than would be used for direct feeding.
- Parasite Prevalence
- Feeding Method
- Thick Blood Smear
- Gametocyte Carrier
Studies of vector-parasite relationships under field conditions have helped to identify human reservoirs of infection[1, 2] host-, parasite-, and vector-based determinants of infection; the natural efficiency of sporogonic development in the mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae; and naturally occurring transmission-blocking antibodies [1, 5–7]. Most of these important studies have been performed with colony-reared mosquitoes or F1 progeny from field-collected mosquitoes which fed either directly on naturally-infected hosts or using a membrane-feeding apparatus through parafilm or 'baudruche' membranes on blood drawn from infected humans. Although mosquitoes can be infected using either feeding method, as determined by dissection of mosquito midguts for oocysts 7–8 days after feeding, the two methods have never been compared for efficiency of transmission. The degree to which the two methods reflect the natural transmission-blocking activity of host antibodies in the mosquito is unclear, because of potential differences in infectivity between Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes from human hosts and those from in vitro cultures, and because of potential differences in infectivity between F1 An. gambiae and laboratory strains of Anopheles freeborni or Anopheles stephensi.
Studies to date have examined human infectiousness to mosquitoes at three distinct levels : (1) infectiousness of the individual according to gametocyte density, (2) the age group reservoir of infection within a site, and, most recently, (3) across populations of differing intensity.
Direct feeding has been the standard laboratory method for measuring transmission-blocking activity (the ability to block transmission from infected human hosts to mosquitoes) among candidate malaria vaccines. However, the direct feeding method could expose subjects to malaria infection if the mosquitoes are not reared under sterile conditions, raising ethical concerns – especially when children are involved in this type of study. Here are reported the results of a study conducted from 1996 to 1998 to evaluate the dynamics of transmission in a rural area of Mali using direct feeding and to then determine differences in infectivity rates between direct feeding and membrane feeding from the blood of young volunteers naturally-infected with P. falciparum. Results of this study, conducted as part of a larger epidemiological study of malaria in the area, could be used to inform study design for future vaccine trials using membrane feeding.
Study design and recruitment of volunteers
Twice a month during our study period, from August 1996 to December 1998, volunteers between four and 18 years of age were recruited from 30 families in Bancoumana. All volunteers were screened for P. falciparum by staining thick blood smears with Giemsa and counting gametocytes and parasites using a microscope. The 10 volunteers with the highest gametocyte levels were selected for the direct feeding experiment in Bancoumana. In 1998, two volunteers with the highest gametocyte levels at each time point were transported to Bamako for comparison of infectivity between direct feeding and membrane feeding.
Written informed consent was obtained from all volunteers or their guardians before enrollment in the study. Human subject's research conducted in our experiments was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the National School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mali.
Laboratory-reared An. gambiae mosquitoes
F1 progeny of wild-caught An. gambiae from Bancoumana were used for all experiments. The mosquitoes were reared in the insectary in Bamako, under controlled conditions of 28°C and 80% relative humidity. Because they were reared in a sterile laboratory environment, they remained uninfected before the experiment began. The mosquitoes were reared to the adult stage (three to six days of age) before being used in feeding experiments. After emerging, female mosquitoes were fed daily with a 5% sugar solution, up to 12 hr before blood feedings.
Direct feeding method
For each volunteer, two paper cups containing 30 mosquitoes each were applied directly to the legs of volunteers, and the 60 mosquitoes were allowed to feed for 10–15 min. In Bancoumana, direct feeding was conducted in a dark room under natural temperature and humidity conditions, which fluxuated during the rainy and dry seasons. In Bamako, direct feeding was conducted in the insectary under constant temperature and humidity as described above. In both locations, we did not clean off the feeding site on the legs of the volunteers. Volunteers with local reactions such as pruritus were treated with an antihistaminic cream.
Membrane feeding method
For the two volunteers selected at each time point for the comparison experiment, membrane feeding was performed using fresh venous blood. Briefly, 3 ml of blood was drawn from each volunteer and mixed with citrate phosphate dextrose. Then, two 1.5-ml aliquots were placed directly into a mosquito feeder within 5 min. Standard medium-sized membrane feeders were used, that used circulating water to maintain a temperature of 37°C. For each volunteer, two cups of 30 mosquitoes each were placed in the feeder, and the 60 mosquitoes were allowed to feed for 10–15 min. All membrane feedings were conducted in Bamako. After participating in the feeding experiments, volunteers were transported back to Bancoumana.
Infectivity assessment among mosquitoes
After feeding on the blood of infected volunteers, non engorged mosquitoes (those with clear abdomens) were discarded, and engorged mosquitoes (those with red, distended abdomens) were retained under the insectary conditions in Bamako, described above, for 7–8 days to permit parasite maturation to the oocysts stage. Then mosquitoes were dissected and oocysts counted from the stomach using microscopy. By definition an infected mosquito is any mosquito with oocysts detected after dissection.
Data management and statistical analysis
All data collected during screening were entered into Visual dBASE, SPSS 10.1 for Windows and Microsoft Excel. Parasite and gametocyte prevalence were then determined according to volunteers age. Mosquito data were analysed from information collected during feeding experiments. Effects of age and season on infectivity were determined from the direct feeding experiment using data from 1997 and 1998 only. Then, a comparison of infectivity was made between direct feeding and membrane feeding methods using data from 1998. For that, the comparison was done for the mean percentages of exposed mosquitoes that were engorged; the mean percentages of engorged mosquitoes that were infected; and the mean percentages of exposed mosquitoes that were infected. Mean percentages were calculated by averaging the percentages determined twice each month. All were calculated using regular means. Student t tests were used for all comparisons. A p value of 0.05 was considered significant.
Direct feeding experiment
Age effect of gametocyte carriers on infectivity by direct feeding in Bancoumana, Mali
Age group (y)
Mean % engorged/all mosquitoes
Mean % infected/engorged mosquitoes
Mean % infected/all mosquitoes
p = 0.525
p = 0.039
p < 0.001
Seasonal effect on infectivity of mosquitoes by direct feeding in Bancoumana, Mali (1997–1998)
Mean % engorged/all mosquitoes
Mean % infected/engorged mosquitoes
Mean % infected/all mosquitoes
P = 0.738
p = 0.120
p = 0.402
Direct feeding versus membrane feeding experiment
Comparison of infectivity between direct and membrane feeding in Bancoumana, Mali
Mean % engorged/all mosquitoes
Mean % infected/engorged mosquitoes
Mean % infected/all mosquitoes
P < 0.001
P < 0. 001
P < 0.001
Because of study implementation difficulties, data from 1996 were not included in this analysis. In the first component of the study the direct feeding was used to evaluate the dynamics of transmission among children aged 4–18 years in rural Mali. Results showed that among 372 gametocyte carriers analyzed, those aged 4–9 years were highly infectious to mosquitoes when compared with those aged 10–18 years, particularly during the rainy season.
In the 1950s, Muirhead-Thompson [11, 12] was the first to publish an attempt to determine the proportion of individuals in a malaria-endemic area, who are infectious to mosquitoes. He found that 10–11% of all individuals in West Africa were infectious to mosquitoes by direct feeding. Because the infectivity rates in children were significantly higher than those in adults (34% of children aged 2–4 years and 37% of children aged 5–9 years infected mosquitoes in that study), he proposed that children represented the major infectious reservoir of malaria parasites. Also, Bousema et al  found that the estimated mean duration of gametocytaemia was 9.4 days (range 2.5 – 23.5) for children below five years of age, 7.8 days (range 2.5 – 23.5) for children aged five to nine years and 4.1 days (range 2.5 – 16.5) for children aged ten years and above. A subsequent study by Githeko et al , in a holoendemic area of western Kenya, confirmed and extended the previous results. In that study, 72% of the infectious reservoir was in children younger than 10 years. Moreover, Boudin et al  found that neither the proportions of reducers nor the medians of transmission blocking immunity (TBI), intensity, or TBI/TI (transmission inhibition) were significantly different between age groups. And thus, age was not predictive for any of the TBI indicators.
The second component of the study, which included 35 gametocyte carriers, compared infectivity rates via direct versus membrane feeding of mosquitoes. A statistically significant difference was observed between the mean percentage of mosquitoes that fed by direct feeding (76.0%) and the mean percentage of mosquitoes that fed by membrane feeding (53.5%), suggesting that mosquitoes preferred to use direct feeding. These results are comparable to those found by Graves et al [5, 6] in 1988. That research also found that for both techniques, 82.82% of all carriers were infectious to mosquitoes. Again, this is similar to our findings that 94.2% and 85.7% of children were infectious by direct and membrane feeding, respectively (with no significant difference between the two values).
However, a statistically significant difference was found between the mean of percentages of engorged mosquitoes infected by direct feeding (28.4%) versus membrane feeding (15.0%). In Cameroon, Mulder et al  observed that a mean of 18.9% of engorged mosquitoes were infected by membrane feeding. Overall, this study shows that, membrane feeding is about half as effective as direct feeding for infecting mosquitoes. And about three times more mosquitoes in the direct feeding group than in the membrane feeding group actually became infected during feeding; this finding can be explained, at least in part, by the fact that mosquitoes preferred direct feeding.
Based on these results, the conclusion is that the membrane feeding method could be used as an alternative to the direct feeding method in biological studies or field trials of transmission-blocking activity among candidate malaria vaccines. Although the intensity of infection is considerably higher when the direct feeding method is used, the difference in infectivity between the two methods could be compensated for by including more mosquitoes in trials using membrane feeding. Using this study as an example, if three-times more mosquitoes had been exposed to membrane feeding, it is expected that the number of mosquitoes infected would have been similar for both methods. The lower mean percentage of mosquitoes infected by membrane feeding may result from damage during blood drawing and handling, or from loss of infectivity while the parasites are in the membrane feeders. Nevertheless, the membrane feeding technique is easily applicable, and its use would resolve the ethical concerns surrounding the direct feeding technique, especially among children.
This investigation received financial support from Tropical Medicine and Research Center (TMRC) project of Mali-Tulane, TMRC AI 95002.
We are grateful to the villagers of Bancoumana, Mali, who kindly participated as volunteers in these studies. We would like to thank Elizabeth Higgs and her team for their facilitating role in writing this paper. We would also like to thank Richard Sakai (Mali) and Louis Miller of LPD/NIH (USA) for their scientific and technical support.
- Mulder B, Tchuinkam T, Dechering K, Verhave JP, Carnevale P, Meuwissen JH, Robert V: Malaria transmission-blocking activity in experimental infectious of Anopheles gambiae from naturally infected Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriers. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992, 88: 121-125. 10.1016/0035-9203(94)90534-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Githeko AK, Brandling-Bennett AD, Beier M, Atieli F, Owaga M, Collins FH: The reservoir of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a holoendemic area of western Kenya. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992, 86: 355-358. 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90216-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beier JC: Malaria parasite development in mosquitoes. Ann Rev Entomol. 1998, 43: 519-543. 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.519.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gouagna LC, Mulder B, Noubissi E, Tchuinkam T, Verhave JP, Boudin C: The early sporogonic cycle of Plasmodium falciparum in laboratory infected Anopheles gambiae: an estimation of parasite efficacy. Trop Med Int Health. 1998, 3: 21-28. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00156.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Graves PM, Burkot TR, Carter R, Cattani JA, Lagog M, Parker J, Brabin BJ, Gibson FD, Bradley DJ, Alpers MP: Measurement of malarial infectivity of human populations to mosquitoes in the Madang area, Papua New Guinea. Parasitology. 1988, 96: 251-263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Graves PM, Carter R, Burkot TR, Quakyi IA, Kumar NK: Antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum gamete surface antigens in Papua New Guinea sera. Parasite Immunol. 1988, 10: 208-215. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1988.tb00215.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roeffen W, Mulder B, Teelen K, Bolmer M, Eling W, Targett GA, Beckers PJ, Sauerwein R: Association between anti-Pfs48/45 reactivity and P. falciparum transmission-blocking activity in Cameroon. Parasite Immunol. 1996, 18: 103-109. 10.1046/j.1365-3024.1996.d01-54.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lensen A, Mulder L, Tchuinkam T, Willemsen L, Eling W, Sauerwein R: Mechanisms that reduce transmission of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in semiimmune and nonimmune individuals. J Infect Dis. 1998, 177: 1358-1363.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rieckman KH, Beaudoin RL, Cassells JS, Sell KW: Use of attenuated sporozoites in the immunization of human volunteers against falciparum malaria. Bull World Health Organ. 1979, 57: 261-266.Google Scholar
- Touré YT: Bioécologie des anophèles dans une zone rurale de savanne soudanienne au Mali (village de Banambani). Incidence sur la transmission du paludisme et la filariose de Bancroft. 1979, Thèse de 3ème cycle, Entomologie mèdicale, BamakoGoogle Scholar
- Muirhead-Thomsen RC: Factors determining the true reservoir of infection of Plasmodium falciparum and Wucherreria bancrofti in a West African village. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1954, 48: 208-225. 10.1016/0035-9203(54)90067-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muirhead-Thomsen RC: The malarial infectivity of an African village population to mosquitoes (Anopheles gambiae): a random xenodiagnostic survey. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1957, 6: 971-979.Google Scholar
- Bousema T, Gouagna J, Bakeley CJ, Meutstege AM, Okech BA, Akim INJ, Beier JC, Githure JI, Sauerwein RW: Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriage in asymptomatic children in western Kenya. Malar J. 2004, 3: 18-10.1186/1475-2875-3-18.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boudin C, Kolk Van Der M, Tchuinkam T, Gouagna C, Bonne S, Safeukui I, Mulder B, Meunier JY, Verhave JP: Plasmodium falciparum transmission blocking immunity under conditions of low and high endemicity in Cameroon. Parasite Immunol. 2004, 26: 105-110. 10.1111/j.0141-9838.2004.00689.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mendis C, Gamage-Mendis AC, De Zoysa AP, Abhayawardena TA, Carter R, Mendis KN: Characteristics of malaria transmission in Kataragama, Sri Lanka: a focus for immuno-epidemiological studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990, 42: 298-308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carter R, Kumar N, Quakyi I, Good M, Mendis K, Graves P, Miller L: Immunity to sexual stages of malaria parasites. Prog Allergy. 1988, 41: 193-214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lines JD, Wilkes TJ, Lyimo EO: Human malaria infectiousness measured by age-specific sporozoite rates in Anopheles gambiae in Tanzania. Parasitology. 1991, 102: 167-177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaslow DC, Isaacs SN, Quakyi IA, Gwadz RW, Moss B, Keister DB: Induction of Plasmodium falciparum transmission-blocking antibodies by recombinant vaccinia virus. Science. 1991, 252: 1310-1312. 10.1126/science.1925544.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaslow DC: Transmission-blocking vaccines: uses and current status of development. Int J Parasitol. 1997, 27: 183-189. 10.1016/S0020-7519(96)00148-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ponnudurai T, Lensen AH, Van Gemeri GJ, Bensink MP, Bolmer M, Meuwissen JH: Infectivity of cultured Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes to mosquitoes. Parasitology. 1989, 98: 165-173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rieckman KH, Carson PE, Beaudoin RL, Cassells JS, Sell KW: Sporozoites induced immunity in man against an Ethiopian strain of P. falciparum. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1974, 68: 258-259. 10.1016/0035-9203(74)90129-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paul RE, Bonnet S, Boudin C, Tchuinkam T, Robert V: Age-structure gametocyte allocation links immunity to epidemiology in mlaria parasites. Malar J. 2007, 6: 123-10.1186/1475-2875-6-123.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riehle MM, Markianos K, Niaré O, Xu J, Li J, Touré AM, Podiougou B, Oduol F, Diawara S, Diallo M, Coulibaly B, Ouatara A, Kruglyak L, Traoré SF, Vernick KD: Natural malaria infection in Anopheles gambiae is regulated by a single genomic control region. Science. 2006, 312: 577-579. 10.1126/science.1124153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.