Open Access

Failure of artesunate-mefloquine combination therapy for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in southern Cambodia

  • William O Rogers1Email author,
  • Rithy Sem2, 3,
  • Thong Tero4,
  • Pheaktra Chim3,
  • Pharath Lim3,
  • Sinuon Muth2,
  • Duong Socheat2,
  • Frédéric Ariey3 and
  • Chansuda Wongsrichanalai1, 5
Malaria Journal20098:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-10

Received: 23 July 2008

Accepted: 12 January 2009

Published: 12 January 2009

Abstract

Background

Resistance to anti-malarial drugs hampers control efforts and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality from malaria. The efficacy of standard therapies for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria was assessed in Chumkiri, Kampot Province, Cambodia.

Methods

One hundred fifty-one subjects with uncomplicated falciparum malaria received directly observed therapy with 12 mg/kg artesunate (over three days) and 25 mg/kg mefloquine, up to a maximum dose of 600 mg artesunate/1,000 mg mefloquine. One hundred nine subjects with uncomplicated vivax malaria received a total of 25 mg/kg chloroquine, up to a maximum dose of 1,500 mg, over three days. Subjects were followed for 42 days or until recurrent parasitaemia was observed. For P. falciparum infected subjects, PCR genotyping of msp1, msp2, and glurp was used to distinguish treatment failures from new infections. Treatment failure rates at days 28 and 42 were analyzed using both per protocol and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Real Time PCR was used to measure the copy number of the pfmdr1 gene and standard 48-hour isotopic hypoxanthine incorporation assays were used to measure IC50 for anti-malarial drugs.

Results

Among P. falciparum infected subjects, 47.0% were still parasitemic on day 2 and 11.3% on day 3. The PCR corrected treatment failure rates determined by survival analysis at 28 and 42 days were 13.1% and 18.8%, respectively. Treatment failure was associated with increased pfmdr1 copy number, higher initial parasitaemia, higher mefloquine IC50, and longer time to parasite clearance. One P. falciparum isolate, from a treatment failure, had markedly elevated IC50 for both mefloquine (130 nM) and artesunate (6.7 nM). Among P. vivax infected subjects, 42.1% suffered recurrent P. vivax parasitaemia. None acquired new P. falciparum infection.

Conclusion

The results suggest that artesunate-mefloquine combination therapy is beginning to fail in southern Cambodia and that resistance is not confined to the provinces at the Thai-Cambodian border. It is unclear whether the treatment failures are due solely to mefloquine resistance or to artesunate resistance as well. The findings of delayed clearance times and elevated artesunate IC50 suggest that artesunate resistance may be emerging on a background of mefloquine resistance.

Background

The spread of drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum has complicated efforts to control malaria, and can lead to unnecessary mortality if ineffective drugs remain the standard of care after drug-resistant strains become established [1, 2]. In south-east Asia, resistance to multiple anti-malarial drugs, including chloroquine, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, quinine, and mefloquine is common [3]. In the face of this situation, many countries in the region have adopted artemisinin combination therapies, including artesunate-mefloquine and artemether-lumefantrine. In both Thailand and Cambodia, rising failure rates for mefloquine monotherapy led to introduction of artesunate-mefloquine combination therapy in 1995 and 2000 [4, 5], respectively. The combination was more effective than mefloquine monotherapy. Introduction of artesunate in combination with mefloquine, a drug against which resistance is already common in the region [6] may not protect against the development and spread of artesunate resistance. Indeed, preliminary reports from both sides of the Thai-Cambodian border have suggested that resistance to the artesunate-mefloquine combination may be emerging. In 2003, a regimen of 25 mg/kg mefloquine in two divided doses on day 0, and 12 mg/kg oral artesunate divided into two doses on day 0 and day 1, in Trat, Thailand, along the Cambodian border, produced an adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) at day 28 in only 78.6% of 44 patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria; at three other sites in Thailand the same regimen had an efficacy of > 90% [4]. In 2002 in Pailin, a Cambodian province bordering Trat, a similar regimen produced ACPR at 28 days in 85.7% of subjects [5]; in this study almost one third of patients received less than 12 mg/kg artesunate and 20 mg/kg mefloquine, because blister pack doses were administered according to age rather than to weight. Nonetheless, the ACPR was > 90% at sites outside of Pailin where the same dosing scheme was used. In 2004, using dosing based on weight rather than age, the 42 day ACPR was 79.3% in Pailin [5]. Both the Thai and Cambodian studies used directly observed therapy and the Cambodian study also used PCR correction for re-infection [7]. These findings suggest that resistance to artesunate-mefloquine may be emerging at the Thai-Cambodian border.

Although the Thai-Cambodian border is frequently cited as an epicenter for the emergence of anti-malarial drug resistance, there is no reason to think that new anti-malarial drug resistance genotypes are constrained to arise there. Mefloquine resistance is common in many areas outside the Thai-Cambodian border region, and artemisinin has been used as monotherapy in the Greater Mekong Area for hundreds of years. Four sites in Cambodia were recently surveyed for the presence of P. falciparum strains containing amplifications of the pfmdr1 gene, associated with mefloquine resistance. The highest prevalence of amplifications was found in Chumkiri, in Southern Cambodia, rather than at the Thai border in Pailin (unpublished data). In order to ask whether the high background of pfmdr1 amplification might favor emergence of resistance to artesunate-mefloquine, an in vivo efficacy study of combined 12 mg/kg artesunate and 25 mg/kg in uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria using the recommended WHO protocol for in vivo anti-malarial efficacy studies was conducted. In accordance with then current Ministry of Health recommendations the maximum dose used was 600 mg artesunate, 1,000 mg mefloquine. The efficacy of 25 mg/kg chloroquine, maximum dose 1,500 mg, as monotherapy for uncomplicated P. vivax malaria was studied simultaneously.

Methods

Study site

The study was conducted between August 2006 and February 2008 in Chumkiri District, Kampot Province, in southern Cambodia. Chumkiri is located approximately 100 km SSW of Phnom Penh and 50 km west of the Vietnamese border, at 10.7° latitude N, 104.3° longitude E. Chumkiri town is located on a plain used for rice cultivation and surrounded by forested mountains. The climate is tropical with a rainy season extending from May-June to November. Malaria cases occur throughout the year, but most cases occur during the rainy season. Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax are present in roughly equal proportion.

Study subjects

Subjects who presented to the Chumkiri Health Center with uncomplicated mono-infection by P. falciparum or P. vivax were recruited. Inclusion criteria for P. falciparum infected subjects were 1) uncomplicated P. falciparum infection with parasitaemia between 1,000 and 100,000 parasites/mm3 as determined by counting parasites per 200 white blood cells or per 1,000 red blood cells in Giemsa-stained thick or thin blood films and multiplying by standard estimates of white and red blood cell counts, 5,000 wbc/mm3 and 4,000,000 rbc/mm3, 2) age ≥ 1 year, 3) axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C or a history of fever in the past 24 hours, and 4) negative urine pregnancy test for women. Exclusion criteria were 1) any sign of severe or complicated malaria according to World Health Organization criteria [8] 2) unwillingness to remain at clinic for directly observed therapy or to return for follow-up visits, 3) mixed species Plasmodium infection, and 4) breastfeeding. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for uncomplicated P. vivax infection were identical except that the lower limit of parasitaemia was 500 parasites/mm3.

Anti-malarial therapy and follow-up

Subjects with uncomplicated falciparum malaria received a total dose of 12 mg/kg artesunate (MissionPharma, Lynge, Denmark, 50 mg tablets) in three daily doses and a total dose of 25 mg/kg mefloquine (PharmaDanica, Lynge, Denmark 250 mg tablets) in two doses eight hours apart, up to a maximum dose of 600 mg artesunate and 1,000 mg mefloquine. Subjects with uncomplicated vivax malaria received a total dose of 25 mg/kg chloroquine base (Nanjing Baijingyu Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd, Nanjing, China, 150 mg tablets) given 10 mg/kg on day 0 and day 1, and 5 mg/kg on day 2, up to a maximum total dose of 1,500 mg. All doses were directly observed. If the patient vomited within one hour of receiving a dose, the dose was repeated. The study physician evaluated each subject and collected blood for malaria thick and thin film examination on days 0,1,2,3,7,14,21,28,35, and 42, and at any time when the subject reported to the clinic with fever or other symptoms suggestive of malaria. Two microscopists read all blood smears; a third reference microscopist resolved any discrepancies. Patients with recurrent P. falciparum parasitaemias received oral quinine sulfate, 10 mg salt/kg three times daily, and tetracycline 1 g per day. Patients with new or recurrent P. vivax parasitaemia during the follow-up period received chloroquine as above.

Parasite genotyping

For initial infections and recurrences with P. falciparum, DNA isolation and characterization of allelic polymorphisms in the genes encoding MSP1, MSP2, and GLURP by PCR were performed as described [9]. If any of the alleles from any of the three genes present in the sample from the day of recurrence were not present in the Day 0 sample, then the recurrence of parasitaemia was ascribed to a new infection rather than to treatment failure. The copy number of the pfmdr1 gene was determined by Real Time PCR (RT-PCR) as previously described [10]. In brief, a multiplexed assay using primers and a FAM-TAMRA (6-carboxyfluorescein 6-carboxy-tetra-methylrhodamine) labeled probe specific for pfmdr1 [11] and primers and a VIC-TAMRA (proprietary formula, ABI, Foster City, CA) probe [12] specific for β-tubulin was carried out, so that both genes could be assayed in the same reaction. The probes were obtained from MWG Biotech (High Point, NC) and the primers from Applied Biosystems (ABI, Foster City, CA). PCR reactions were performed on the Rotogene 6000 thermocycler (Corbett Life Science, New South Wales, Australia). Each plate included a sample from the control P. falciparum strains 3D7 and Dd2, which are known to have one and four pfmdr1 copies, respectively [13, 14]. Pfmdr1 copy number was calculated as follows: copy number = (Eβ-tubulin)CT(β-tubulin)/(Epfmdr1)CT(pfmdr1), where E and CT represent the efficiency and cycle threshold of the respective targets. It was assumed that Eβ-tubulin = 2; Epfmdr1 was then calculated using the CTpfmdr1 and CTβ-tubulin values obtained with the 3D7 control. The results of the assay were accepted if the Dd2 control had a calculated pfmdr1 copy number between 3.5 and 4.5.

In vitro drug resistance assay

The in vitro drug sensitivity of the P. falciparum isolates was assessed by use of a classical isotopic 48-hour test [15]. In brief, mefloquine and artesunate were obtained from IMTSSA (Institut de Medicine Tropical, Service de Santé des Armées, Marseille, France). Stock solutions of mefloquine and artesunate were prepared in methanol and further two-fold serial dilutions in distilled water (Biosedra, France). The final concentrations ranged from 0.05 to 51.2 nM for artesunate and 1 to 1024 nM for mefloquine. Two wells of a Falcon 96-well, flat-bottom plate (ATGC, France) were coated with each drug concentration, the plates were dried in a sterile cabinet, and were stored at 4°C until use. Their suitability for in vitro testing was monitored using reference strains of P. falciparum with known drug sensitivities. Fresh blood samples were washed three times with RPMI 1640 medium (GibcoTM, Invitrogen Corporation, France) by centrifugation (800 g, 10 min, 4°C) and then tested directly without culture adaptation. The infected erythrocytes (1.5% haematocrit, 0.1% – 1% parasitaemia) were suspended in complete RPMI medium supplemented with 10% of decomplemented human AB+ serum (Biomedia, France), buffered with 25 mM/l Hepes, 11 mM/l D-(+)-glucose 25 mM/l NaHCO3, and containing [8-3H] hypoxanthine (0.5 μci/well; Amersham Biosciences, France), and the mixture (200 μl per well) was distributed into the 96-well test plates pre-coated with anti-malarial drugs. Each plate included two drug-free control wells and one control well without parasites. The plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere and the cells then lysed by freeze-thawing. After collection on glass-fiber filter paper using a cell harvester, the amount of [3H] hypoxanthine incorporated into the parasites' nucleoprotein was determined using a Wallac MicroBeta Trilux counter (Perkin Elmer, France). A log probit approximation was used to determine the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50), defined as the concentration at which 50% of the incorporation of [3H] hypoxanthine was inhibited, as compared with the drug-free control wells.

Statistical analysis

The primary outcome was recurrence of P. falciparum or P. vivax parasitaemia. Subjects who met World Health Organization criteria for early treatment failure (parasitaemia on day 2 > on day 0, parasitaemia on day 3 > 25% of parasitaemia on day 0, or fever and any parasitaemia on day 3) [7] but who cleared their parasitaemia by day 7 were not given additional treatment and were not analyzed as treatment failures unless they subsequently suffered recurrent parasitaemia. In the case of subjects with P. falciparum malaria, the results of both per protocol and Kaplan-Meier analysis are reported. In the per protocol analysis the proportion of treatment failures was calculated by dividing the total number of subjects with recurrent parasitaemias (with or without PCR correction for re-infection) by the number of subjects who either suffered recurrent parasitaemia or completed the full 42 day follow-up period. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, subjects were censored from the point at which they 1) were lost to follow-up or 2) acquired a P. vivax infection. The proportion of treatment failures for both day 28 and day 42 is reported. In the case of subjects with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria the analysis was identical, except that no attempt was made to distinguish between recrudescence, re-infection, and relapse from the liver. Subjects were considered to have cleared parasitaemia if there were at least two sequential negative smears. The day on which the first such negative smear was observed was defined as the day of clearance. Because smears were not taken on days 4–6, subjects with a reported clearance day 7 may actually have cleared their parasitaemia on any day between day 4 and 7. All statistical analysis was performed with StataSE 8.0.

Results

In vivo efficacy

The baseline characteristics of the study subjects are shown in Table 1. Between August 2006 and December 2007, 151 subjects with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were enrolled. One subject withdrew before completing treatment. Of the 150 who completed treatment, 127 (84.7%) still had P. falciparum parasitaemia on day 1, 71 (52.7%) on day 2, and 17 (11.3%) on day 3. All subjects were free of parasitaemia by day 7. Of these 150 subjects, seven (4.7%) were lost to follow-up before completing 42 days follow-up. Among the remaining 143 subjects, 31 (20.7%) developed recurrent P. falciparum parasitaemia. None of the recurrent parasitaemias occurred before day 14. Based on PCR genotyping for MSP1, MSP2, and GLURP, 4 of these parasitaemias were judged to be new infections and 27 to be recrudescences. Of the 27 recrudescences, 24 were accompanied by fever (axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C) and were classified as late clinical failures; the remaining 3 were classified as late parasitological failures. Four subjects met criteria for early treatment failure[7], but cleared their parasitaemia by day 7 without additional treatment. Of these four, three suffered recrudescences (two on day 21, one on day 28); one remained aparasitemic from day 7 through the end of the 42 day follow-up and was not counted as a treatment failure. Eight subjects (5.3%) developed P. vivax parasitaemia, one on day 32 and seven on day 42. Figure 1 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curve for PCR-corrected artesunate-mefloquine efficacy, throughout the follow-up period. Table 2 shows failure rates at days 28 and 42, calculated on both a per protocol and survival analysis basis, with and without PCR correction for re-infection.
Table 1

Study subject demographics and parasitaemia

Species

Sex, male (%)

Age, yrs (S.D.)

Geometric Mean Parasitaemia, parasites/mm3 (5, 95 centiles)

P. falciparum

141/151

(93.4%)

27.1

(9.5)

5857

(1250, 43375)

P. vivax

97/109

(89.0%)

21.2

(6.7)

5427

(1000, 11000)

Table 2

Failure rates for uncomplicated falciparum malaria treated with mefloquine artesunate

Analysis

PCR Correction

Failure Rate (%)

Day 28 (95% CI)

Failure Rate (%)

Day 42 (95% CI)

Kaplan-Meier

Yes

13.1

(8.5, 19.7)

18.8

(13.3, 26.2)

 

No

15.1

(10.2, 22.0)

21.4

(15.5, 29.0)

Per Protocol

Yes

13.4

(7.8, 19.0)

19.4

(12.8, 26.0)

 

No

15.2

(9.4, 21.0)

21.7

(14.9, 28.4)

Figure 1

Mefloquine-artesunate survival curve. Shown is the proportion of subjects remaining free of P. falciparum following treatment with mefloquine artesunate. The point estimate (bold line) and 95% confidence intervals (dotted lines) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Only PCR-confirmed treatment failures are included.

One hundred ten subjects with uncomplicated vivax malaria were enrolled. One subject was withdrawn from the study on day 1 when he was found to have a mixed P. vivax/P. falciparum infection. Of the remaining 109 subjects, 79 (72.5%) still had P. vivax parasitaemia on day 1, 5 (4.6%) on day 2, and 1 (0.9%) on day 3. All subjects were free of parasitaemia by day 7. Two subjects were lost to follow-up, at 28 and 25 days. Among the 107 subjects who completed follow-up, 45 (42.1%) suffered recurrent P. vivax parasitaemia; all recurrent parasitaemias occurred between day 28 and day 42. No attempt was made to distinguish between recrudescence, relapse from the liver, and re-infection. None of the P. vivax subjects acquired P. falciparum infection during follow-up.

Predictors of treatment failure

For logistical reasons, it was possible to measure the IC50 for mefloquine and artesunate in samples from only 51 P. falciparum subjects, 38 subjects who did not suffer a recrudescence and 13 who did. Figure 2 shows the IC50 for mefloquine and artesunate for each of these samples. The mean mefloquine IC50 in subjects who suffered a recrudescence was 34 nM (95% CI 10–57) higher than in those who did not, 90 nM (95% CI 65–115 nM) versus 56 nM (95% CI 45–67 nM). The mean artesunate IC50 was also higher in subjects who suffered recrudescence, 1.7 nM (95% CI 0.7–2.7 nM), than in those who did not, 1.2 nM (95%CI 1.0–1.5 nM), but the difference was not statistically significant.
Figure 2

In vitro susceptibilities to mefloquine and artesunate. Shown are the IC50 for mefloquine and artesunate for parasite samples from patients who did (black circles) or did not (white circles) suffer a PCR-confirmed treatment failure.

Amplification of the pfmdr1 gene has been associated with mefloquine resistance [16]. Table 3 shows the mean pfmdr1 copy number and the proportion of samples with estimated copy number > 1.5 in the samples from day 0 and from the day of recrudescence. Samples from the day 0 parasitaemia in subjects who ultimately suffered a recrudescence had a higher mean pfmdr1 copy number than those from subjects who did not (2.7 versus 1.9, P = 0.003, t test). The relative risk for recrudescence in subjects with pfmdr1 copy number > 1.5 was 3.5 (95% CI 1.4–8.8). Recrudescent samples had a higher mean copy number than the corresponding day 0 samples (3.5 versus 2.6, P = 0.0013, paired t test).
Table 3

Relationship between pfmdr1 copy number and risk of recurrence

Recrudescence

Number

pfmdr 1 Copy #

(95% CI) Day 0

Proportion with Copy # > 1.5

Day 0

pfmdr 1 Copy #

(95% CI) Day Recur

Proportion with Copy # > 1.5

Day Recur

No

122

1.9

(1.7–2.2)

0.45

3.0*

(0.9–5.2)

0.75*

Yes

27

2.7

(2.1–3.2)

0.74

3.6

(2.9–4.3)

0.85

*Results from the 4 subjects with recurrent parasitaemia classified as re-infection by PCR

Table 4 shows the relationship between the day of clearance, the risk of recrudescence, amplification of the pfmdr1 gene, and the initial parasite density. Longer time to parasite clearance was associated with greater risk of subsequent recrudescence, a greater proportion of pfmdr1 amplification, and higher initial parasitaemia. Table 5 shows the results of multiple logistic regression analysis of factors associated with risk of recrudescence; higher initial parasitaemia, longer clearance time, and pfmdr1 copy number were independently associated with higher risk of recrudescence.
Table 4

Parasite clearance times

Day of Clearance*

Number (%)

(95% CI)

Treatment Failure

Proportion

(95% CI)

pfmdr1 Copy # > 1.5

Proportion

(95% CI)

Day 0 Parasite Density (parasites/mm3)

Geometric Mean

(95% CI)

1

23 (15.3)

(9.5–21.2)

0.0

(0.0–0.13)

0.22

(0.05–0.39)

3099

(2049–4687)

2

56 (37.3)

(29.5–45.1)

0.16

(0.06–0.26)

0.52

(0.39–0.65)

5336

(4089–6964)

3

54 (36.0)

(28.2–43.8)

0.19

(0.09–0.29)

0.57

(0.44–0.70)

7741

(5887–10179)

7

17 (11.3)

(6.2–16.5)

0.47

(0.23–0.72)

0.59

(0.36–0.82)

8061

(4912–13230)

*Parasitaemia was considered to have cleared after two negative smears. The day on which the first of these two negative smears was observed was counted as the day of clearance.

Table 5

Multiple logistic regression model of risk factors for recrudescence.

Risk factor

Odds ratio* (95% CI)

P value

Log parasite density

3.40 (1.12, 10.3)

0.031

Day of clearance

1.48 (1.13, 1.94)

0.004

Pfmdr1 copy number

1.92 (1.32, 2.79)

0.001

*This represents the increment in the odds ratio for recrudescence for each single unit increase in the risk factor, one log of parasitaemia density, one additional day for clearance, or one additional copy of pfmdr1.

Discussion

An unexpectedly high failure rate for artesunate-mefloquine treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria was found at a site in Cambodia far from the Thai-Cambodian border, frequently considered a hot spot for the emergence of anti-malarial drug resistance. The failure rates at 28 and 42 days, calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and PCR correction for re-infection, were 13.1% (95% CI 8.5–19.7%) and 18.8% (95% CI 13.3–26.2%), respectively. Although it was not possible to measure circulating drug levels during therapy, all doses were directly observed, and the drugs were obtained through the Cambodian Ministry of Health from suppliers following current Good Manufacturing Practices. Thus, while it is formally possible that the unexpectedly high failure rates are due to adulterated, defective, or counterfeit anti-malarials, it seems unlikely. The study used the then current maximum dose of mefloquine, 1,000 mg. It is possible that efficacy would have been higher had we used a maximum of 1,250 or 1,500 mg. If treatment failures were related to a low dose/weight of mefloquine, it would have been expected that heavier subjects would be at greater risk of failure. The mean weight, however, of subjects who had an ACPR (50.6 kg; 95% CI 49.0, 52.3), was not significantly different from those who did not (51.0 kg; 95% CI 47.8, 54.2); similarly the mean administered mefloquine dose per kg did not differ significantly between ACPR and failure (19.8 mg/kg vs. 19.7 mg/kg, P = 0.85, t-test). The risk of failure was the same in subjects < 40 kg, 40–50 kg, or > 50 kg, and in regression analysis there was no relationship between either weight or actual mefloquine dose per kg and time to clearance or risk of recrudescence. It therefore seems unlikely that increasing the maximum mefloquine dose would have significantly changed the observed failure rates.

It is possible that PCR correction in fact led to an underestimation of the failure rate. Malaria transmission is not intense at this study site; most infections (> 80%) contained only a single genotype (data not shown). None of the 109 subjects enrolled with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria and treated with chloroquine acquired new P. falciparum infection during the 42 day follow-up period, suggesting that the P. falciparum attack rate is relatively low. PCR genotyping may miss minor parasite populations present on day 0 which may be selected during treatment, thus incorrectly characterizing treatment failures as new infections. That such selection occurred is suggested by the observation (Table 3) that the mean pfmdr1 copy number increased from day 0 to the day of recurrence, even in the 4 cases classified by PCR as re-infection. If these four cases in fact represent additional treatment failures, then the 28 and 42 day failure rates would be 15.1% (95%CI 10.2–22.0%) and 21.4% (95% CI 15.5–29.0%), respectively.

Use of non-study anti-malarial drugs during follow-up might also lower the measured treatment failure rate. Although subjects were instructed not to take anti-malarial drugs during the follow-up period, except those provided as treatment for documented recurrences by the study team, and although none reported having done so, we cannot exclude the possibility that some subjects may have taken non-study anti-malarial drugs. Such unrecorded treatment might have reduced the apparent treatment failure rate. In that case the failure rates reported herein would be an underestimate.

It is not clear whether the resistance observed here is due entirely to resistance to mefloquine, or whether there is also a contribution of resistance to artesunate. It is well known that a 3 day regimen of artesunate monotherapy for P. falciparum has a high risk of late recrudescence [17, 18]. It is possible that mefloquine resistance is effectively converting the artesunate-mefloquine combination therapy used here into artesunate monotherapy. Indeed, both the presence of amplification of the pfmdr1 gene and elevated mefloquine IC50 were predictive of treatment failure. It may be that all the observed treatment failures are due solely to mefloquine resistance. There was, however, some evidence suggestive of resistance to artesunate. First, pure mefloquine resistance should not greatly affect the time to parasite clearance in subjects treated with artesunate-mefloquine combination therapy. Trials of artesunate monotherapy [19, 20] and artesunate-mefloquine combination therapy [21] have generally found more rapid parasite clearance than found at this site. For example, in a study conducted in 2001 on the western border of Thailand [21], treatment with the same artesunate-mefloquine regimen used here produced parasite clearance by day 2 in 98.4% of uncomplicated P. falciparum infections. Similarly, in a study carried out in northern Lao in 2003 [22], the same artesunate-mefloquine regimen cleared 98.1% of subjects by day 2. Although clearance times with artesunate-mefloquine may be slightly faster than with artesunate monotherapy [19], even artesunate monotherapy is expected to clear parasitaemia in > 90% of subjects by day 2 [19, 20]. In contrast, only 53% of subjects in the current study treated with artesunate-mefloquine were free of parasitaemia by day 2. Second, although the artesunate IC50 values were not strongly predictive of treatment failure, one sample with markedly elevated IC50 for both artesunate (6.7 nM) and mefloquine (130 nM) was identified. It thus appears possible that, at this study site, artesunate resistance is beginning to emerge on a background of pre-existing mefloquine resistance. If recent reports of declining efficacy of artesunate-mefloquine in Trat, Thailand [4], and Pailin, Cambodia [5], near the Thai-Cambodian border similarly reflect early emergence of artesunate resistance, then that resistance may not be confined to a small focus on the Thai-Cambodian border. Regardless of the specific target or mechanism of resistance, the failure rates observed here for artesunate-mefloquine, if confirmed elsewhere, suggest that it may be necessary to use a different partner drug in artemisinin combination therapy in Cambodia.

Current Cambodian Ministry of Health treatment guidelines do not include primaquine treatment for vivax malaria because of the difficulty in screening for G6PD deficiency before treatment. It is not surprising that frequent recurrent P. vivax parasitaemia by day 42 (45/110, 41.3%) was found. All of the recurrent parasitaemias occurred after day 28 and all but 2 after day 35. Given the late timing of the recurrences, the absence of radical treatment to eliminate hypnozoites from the liver, and the lack of blood chloroquine levels on the day of recurrence, it is impossible to draw any conclusions about chloroquine resistance. It is clear, however, that subjects with vivax malaria treated with chloroquine alone are at substantial risk of recurrent morbidity; further studies including primaquine treatment and measurement of drug levels will be required to determine whether chloroquine resistance, reported elsewhere in south-east Asia, is a problem in Cambodia.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Preab Ratha, Director, Trapaing Raing Health Center, and Preab Saroth, Malaria Supervisor for Kampot Province, for supporting the study, Steve Meshnick for advice on the pfmdr1 copy number assay, and all the study subjects for their participation. The authors also thank the Office of Defense Cooperation, American Embassy Phnom Penh for providing mosquito nets to study participants. The study was supported by the Department of Defense Global Epidemic Information System, the Department of State Biosecurity Enhancement Program, NIH training grant 5D43TW007402-02, and the International Atomic Energy Agency. The study was reviewed and approved by the National Ethics Committee of Cambodia and the Institutional Review Board of NAMRU-2, and was conducted in compliance with all relevant ethical standards and regulations governing research involving human subjects. The views expressed herein are the private ones of the authors and do not purport to reflect those of the Department of Defense or the Department of the Navy.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Naval Medical Research Unit
(2)
National Malaria Center
(3)
Institut Pasteur du Cambodge
(4)
Ministry of Health Referral Hospital, Chouk District
(5)
Office of Public Health, USAID Regional Development Mission – Asia

References

  1. Trape JF: The public health impact of chloroquine resistance in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 64: 12-17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zucker JR, Ruebush TK, Obonyo C, Otieno J, Campbell CC: The mortality consequences of the continued use of chloroquine in Africa: experience in Siaya, western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 386-390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Na-Bangchang K, Congpuong K: Current malaria status and distribution of drug resistance in East and Southeast Asia with special focus to Thailand. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007, 211: 99-113. 10.1620/tjem.211.99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Vijaykadga S, Rojanawatsirivej C, Cholpol S, Phoungmanee D, Nakavej A, Wongsrichanalai C: In vivo sensitivity monitoring of mefloquine monotherapy and artesunate-mefloquine combinations for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Thailand in 2003. Trop Med Int Health. 2006, 11: 211-219. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01557.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Denis MB, Tsuyuoka R, Poravuth Y, Narann TS, Seila S, Lim C, Incardona S, Lim P, Sem R, Socheat D, Christophel EM, Ringwald P: Surveillance of the efficacy of artesunate and mefloquine combination for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health. 2006, 11: 1360-1366. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01690.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. White NJ: Antimalarial drug resistance. J Clin Invest. 2004, 113: 1084-1092.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. World Health Organization: Assessment and Monitoring of Antimalarial Drug Efficacy for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria. WHO/HTM/RBM/2003.50. 2003, Geneva, WHOGoogle Scholar
  8. World Health Organization, Communicable Diseases Cluster: Severe falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 94 (Suppl 1): S1-90. 10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90300-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ariey F, Chalvet W, Hommel D, Peneau C, Hulin A, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Duchemin JB, Sarthou JL, Reynes JM, Fandeur T: Plasmodium falciparum parasites in French Guiana: limited genetic diversity and high selfing rate. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 61: 978-985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Alker AP, Lim P, Sem R, Shah NK, Yi P, Bouth DM, Tsuyuoka R, Maguire JD, Fandeur T, Ariey F, Wongsrichanalai C, Meshnick SR: Pfmdr1 and in vivo resistance to artesunate-mefloquine in falciparum malaria on the Cambodian-Thai border. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 641-647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pickard AL, Wongsrichanalai C, Purfield A, Kamwendo D, Emery K, Zalewski C, Kawamoto F, Miller RS, Meshnick SR: Resistance to antimalarials in Southeast Asia and genetic polymorphisms in pfmdr1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47: 2418-2423. 10.1128/AAC.47.8.2418-2423.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, Brockman A, McGready R, Ashley E, Phaipun L, Patel R, Laing K, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Nosten F, Krishna S: Mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and increased pfmdr1 gene copy number. Lancet. 2004, 364: 438-447. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16767-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferreira ID, Rosario VE, Cravo PV: Real-time quantitative PCR with SYBR Green I detection for estimating copy numbers of nine drug resistance candidate genes in Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J. 2006, 5: 1-10.1186/1475-2875-5-1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wellems TE, Panton LJ, Gluzman IY, do RV, Gwadz RW, Walker-Jonah A, Krogstad DJ: Chloroquine resistance not linked to mdr-like genes in a Plasmodium falciparum cross. Nature. 1990, 345: 253-255. 10.1038/345253a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Desjardins RE, Canfield CJ, Haynes JD, Chulay JD: Quantitative assessment of antimalarial activity in vitro by a semiautomated microdilution technique. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979, 16: 710-718.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wilson CM, Volkman SK, Thaithong S, Martin RK, Kyle DE, Milhous WK, Wirth DF: Amplification of pfmdr 1 associated with mefloquine and halofantrine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum from Thailand. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993, 57: 151-160. 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90252-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ittarat W, Pickard AL, Rattanasinganchan P, Wilairatana P, Looareesuwan S, Emery K, Low J, Udomsangpetch R, Meshnick SR: Recrudescence in artesunate-treated patients with falciparum malaria is dependent on parasite burden not on parasite factors. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 147-152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Meshnick SR, Taylor TE, Kamchonwongpaisan S: Artemisinin and the antimalarial endoperoxides: from herbal remedy to targeted chemotherapy. Microbiol Rev. 1996, 60: 301-315.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Alin MH, Ashton M, Kihamia CM, Mtey GJ, Bjorkman A: Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of artemisinin monotherapy and in combination with mefloquine in patients with falciparum malaria. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996, 41: 587-592. 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.35116.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Giao PT, Binh TQ, Kager PA, Long HP, Van Thang N, Van Nam N, de Vries PJ: Artemisinin for treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria: is there a place for monotherapy?. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 65: 690-695.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutagalung R, Paiphun L, Ashley EA, McGready R, Brockman A, Thwai KL, Singhasivanon P, Jelinek T, White NJ, Nosten FH: A randomized trial of artemether-lumefantrine versus mefloquine-artesunate for the treatment of uncomplicated multi-drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum on the western border of Thailand. Malar J. 2005, 4: 46-10.1186/1475-2875-4-46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Stohrer JM, Dittrich S, Thongpaseuth V, Vanisaveth V, Phetsouvanh R, Phompida S, Monti F, Christophel EM, Lindegardh N, Annerberg A, Jelinek T: Therapeutic efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-mefloquine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Luang Namtha Province, Lao People's Democratic Republic. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 1175-1183. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01320.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rogers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement