Open Access

Chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum parasites in a Brazilian endemic area

  • Bianca Ervatti Gama1,
  • Natália K Almeida de Oliveira1,
  • Mariano G Zalis2,
  • José Maria de Souza3,
  • Fátima Santos4,
  • Cláudio Tadeu Daniel-Ribeiro1 and
  • Maria de Fátima Ferreira-da-Cruz1Email author
Malaria Journal20098:156

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-156

Received: 03 March 2009

Accepted: 14 July 2009

Published: 14 July 2009

Abstract

Background

The goal of the present study was the characterization of Plasmodium falciparum genes associated to malaria drug resistance (pfcrt, pfdhfr and pfdhps), in samples from two Brazilian localities.

Methods

Parasites from 65 P. falciparum samples were genotyped using nested-PCR and direct DNA sequencing.

Results

Six resistant sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) pfdhfr genotypes and one haplotype associated to SP sensitivity were detected. For pfcrt gene, SVMNT chloroquine (CQ)-resistant genotype was detected as well as the CVMNK CQ-sensitive haplotype in the same sample from Paragominas, that showed a SP-sensitive genotype.

Conclusion

This study is the first to document the sensitivity of P. falciparum parasites to CQ and SP in Brazilian field samples. The importance of these findings is discussed.

Background

Malaria is a challenging infectious disease to many countries in the world, especially to those located in tropics and subtropical regions, and the increasing numbers of drug resistant parasites worsens this situation. In Brazil, as well as in other endemic countries, drug-sensitivity tests revealed that Plasmodium falciparum isolates displayed high levels of resistance to many drugs, including chloroquine (CQ) and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) [14]. The first documented case of CQ resistance in Brazil was in 1954; in the sixties several authors in South America (SA) reported the occurrence of in vivo falciparum malaria resistance to CQ and amodiaquine. The spread of 4-amino-quinoleine resistant strains of P. falciparum lead also to the use of SP in the seventies. Unfortunately, at the end of eighteens the SP resistance it was no less than 90% [5] and at the beginning of nineties the CQ failure rate was considered 100% [6] and, consequently, the Brazilian National Malaria Programme withdrew SP and CQ for falciparum malaria treatment. Then, the combination quinine plus tetracycline was introduced, followed by the usage of the combination quinine plus doxycycline or, as second-line drug, mefloquine plus primaquine. In 2007, a fixed combination of artemether plus lumefantrine (Coartem®) was introduced as first-line drug [7] and since 2008, the fixed combination artesunate plus mefloquine (FarManguinhos, Fiocruz) was produced, and its implementation in Brazilian endemic areas is in progress to counteract parasite resistance, according to WHO guidelines [8].

Interestingly, the reemergence of CQ-sensitive P. falciparum parasites as well as the downturn of P. falciparum triple mutants associated to SP resistance, were reported after cessation of monotherapy using CQ or SP for the treatment of P. falciparum malaria [913]. These findings provide a rationale for the search of drug-sensitive haplotypes in P. falciparum isolates in Brazilian areas where the use of these two drugs for falciparum malaria treatment has been interrupted since 1990.

The goal at the present study was, therefore, the characterization of pfcrt, pfdhfr and pfdhps genes that are known molecular markers of P. falciparum resistance to CQ and SP [14].

Methods

Study sites, blood samples and DNA extraction

Parasites from 65 P. falciparum samples were genotyped. These samples were collected at the time of diagnosis from uncomplicated malaria patients living in two Brazilian malaria-endemic areas: Porto Velho – Rondônia state (n = 46), and Paragominas – Pará state (n = 19). After obtaining the informed consent, venous blood collection was done according to protocols previously approved by the ethics research committees of Fiocruz and of local study sites. DNA was extracted from 1 ml of cryopreserved blood using QIAamp midi columns as described by the manufacturer (Qiagen).

Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) and electrophoresis

A nested-PCR technique was employed in order to amplify a partial DNA sequence containing the major single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to drug-resistance for each target gene as: SNPs A16V/S, C50R, N51I, C59R, S108N, V140L plus I164L for pfdhfr, S436A/F/C, A437G, K540E, A581G plus A613T/S for pfdhps, and SNPs C72S, M74I, N75E/D plus K76T for pfcrt. The protocols of pfdhfr and pfdhps nested PCRs have been described elsewhere [15]. The amplification of the pfcrt gene fragment was performed with 5 μl of DNA into a 45 μl mixture containing 2.5 mM of MgCl2, 250 μM of dNTPs, 1.25 units of Amplitaq Gold® DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems), and 10 pmol of each primer (Alpha DNA): CRTP1 (5' CCG TTA ATA ATA AAT ACA CGC AG 3') and CRTP2 (5' CGG ATG TTA CAA AAC TAT AGT TAC C 3') to amplify a 537 bp region. The reactions were settled with an initial hold (95°C/10 minutes), 45 cycles (94°C/30 seconds, 56°C/30 seconds and 60°C/1 minute) plus one final hold (60°C/3 minutes). Then, 5 μl of the first PCR amplification were added to 45 μl of a second mixture containing the second set of primers (Alpha DNA): CRTD1 (5' TGT GCT CAT GTG TTT AAA CTT 3') and CRTD2 (5' CAA AAC TAT AGT TAC CAA TTT TG 3') and 32 steps (1 hold 95°C/10 min, 30 cycles 92°C/30 sec, 48°C/30 sec and 65°C/30 sec, and 1 hold 65°C/3 min) were performed to amplify a 134 bp fragment. PCR products were analysed by ethidium bromide-stained agarose-gel (2%) electrophoresis.

DNA sequencing

After DNA purification using the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega), the amplified fragments were sequenced using Big Dye® Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction version 3.1 (Applied Biosystems) and ABI PRISM DNA Analyzer 3730 (Applied Biosystems) from the Genomic Platform/PDTIS/Fiocruz [16].

Results

The pfcrt nested-PCR generated DNA fragments in all the 65 samples, the pfdhps in 63 samples and the pfdhfr nested-PCR in 52 samples, showing different sensitivity threshold among the PCRs.

The pfdhfr gene analysis revealed the existence of seven haplotypes: six associated with drug resistance profiles (ARICNVI, ACICNVI, ACICNVL, ACNRNVI, ACNCNVI and ACIRNVI) and one, from Paragominas locality, associated with SP sensitivity (ACNCSVI). The drug resistance pfdhfr haplotypes displayed up to three (50R + 51I and 108N; 51I + 108N and 164L, or 51I + 59R and 108N) out of seven SNPs herein analysed. Concerning the pfdhps gene, three single haplotypes (SGEGA, SGEAA, SGKAA), displaying up to three (437G + 540E and 581G) out of the five SNPs analysed were observed and, in this case, no drug sensitive haplotype (SAKAA) was detected. In relation to pfcrt gene, two single haplotypes were observed: the SVMNT CQ-resistant in 97% of the samples and the CVMNK CQ-sensitive in the same sample from Paragominas that showed the sensitive genotype to SP (pfdhfr gene). All the three genes displayed at least one mixed haplotype. These results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Pfcrt, pfdhfr and pfdhps haplotypes of P. falciparum parasites from Paragominas (PRG) and Porto Velho (PV), Brazilian Amazon.

Gene

Haplotypes

n (Locality)

%

Mutated codons

pfcrt

S VMNT

63 (18 PRG and 45 PV)

97

2

 

CVMNK

1 (PRG)

1.5

0

 

C/S VMNT

1 (PV)

1.5

1 or 2

pfdhfr

ARI CN VI

27 (14 PRG and 13 PV)

52

3

 

ACI CN VI

3 (1 PRG and 2 PV)

6

2

 

ACI CN VL

17 (1 PRG and 16 PV)

33

3

 

ACNRN VI

1 (PV)

2

2

 

ACIRN VI

1 (PV)

2

3

 

ACNCN VI

1 (PRG)

2

1

 

ACNCSVI

1 (PRG)

2

0

 

ARI CN V I/L

1 (PRG)

2

3 or 4

pfdhps

SGEG A

41 (17 PRG and 24 PV)

65

3

 

SGE AA

9 (1 PRG and 8 PV)

14

2

 

SG KAA

10 (PV)

16

1

 

SGE A/G A

1 (PRG)

1.5

2 or 3

 

SG E/K AA

1 (PV)

1.5

1 or 2

 

SG E/K A/G A

1 (PV)

1.5

1, 2 or 3

Codon positions: pfcrt 72 to 76 (n = 65); pfdhfr 16, 50, 51, 59, 108, 140 and 164 (n = 52); and pfdhps 436, 437, 540, 581 and 613 (n = 63). The sensitive haplotypes are shown in bold characters and the mutated codons are underlined.

A multilocus analysis among the 47 samples showing single haplotypes was performed. The pfdhfr + pfdhps + pfcrt genes presented some usual haplotype associations as, respectively, follows: ARICNVI + SGEGA + SVMNT (42.5%), ACICNVL + SGEGA + SVMNT (27.6%), ARICNVI + SGEAA + SVMNT (10.6%), ACICNVL + SGEAA + SVMNT (6.3%) and ACICNVI + SGEGA + SVMNT (4.2%). Other combinations such as ACICNVI + SGEAA + SVMNT (2.13%), ACNCNVI + SGEGA + SVMNT (2.13%), ACNCSVI + SGEGA + CVMNK (2.13%) and ACNRNVI + SGKAA + SVMNT (2.13%) were observed only once. In all these samples pfdhfr and pfdhps haplotypes were significantly associated (p < 0.0001, Chi-square test); the same was true for the only P. falciparum sample with CQ and SP sensitive genotypes.

The five amino acid insertion between codons 30 and 31 of the pfdhfr gene named "Bolivia repeat" was found in 17 samples (one from Paragominas and 16 from Porto Velho) and it was always associated with the leucine at the codon 164, as previously reported [17].

In the two studied localities, the prevalence of the haplotypes was different, for pfdhfr, pfdhps and pfcrt genes, respectively. In Paragominas the predominant haplotypes were ARICNVI, SGEGA and SVMNT while in Porto Velho, the main ones were ACICNVL, SGEGA and SVMNT.

Discussion

Porto Velho displayed more allelic variation than Paragominas, especially for the pfdhps gene. No previous studies were performed with P. falciparum samples from Paragominas, but two former studies had been performed in Porto Velho using SP [2] or CQ [18] molecular markers. In these reports, the authors detected the haplotypes CVIET (pfcrt gene), AGEGA (pfdhps gene) and the S108T (pfdhfr gene) that were not seen in the present study. However, pfdhps and pfdhfr haplotypes such as SGEAA, SGKAA, ACIRNVI and ACNRNVI, were described for the first time in Brazil, while they had only previously been reported from Tanzania [15] and India [19]. This might be due to the considerable human movement in Porto Velho, not only from other Amazonian (SA) regions, but also from other areas in and outside Brazil, which could also explain the detection of 16 P. falciparum infections harbouring the "Bolivia repeat" against only one identified in Paragominas.

In Venezuela, a pfcrt wild type, similar to that found in Paragominas, was also detected [20]. Differently from Porto Velho, migration from the city of Paragominas to other SA countries is very uncommon and, therefore, the existence of a wild type parasite in Brazil seems not to be related to parasite migration from other SA countries. Since this infection harboured wild-type codons at pfcrt 72, 74, and 75, it is less probable that this haplotype correspond to a single resistant allele that would have reverted at the critical 76 codon (back mutation) and, consequently, the more plausible explanation for this finding is the presence of a bona fide sensitive allele.

Interestingly, in this study, an inferior prevalence of mutated codons associated to SP resistance was perceived when compared pfdhps haplotypes with those already observed in Brazil [2]. For instance, in 1998, Porto Velho isolates displayed triple (53.4%) or quadruple (46.6%) mutants in this gene, while single (22.7%), double (18.2%) and triple (54.5%) mutants were detected in this study, but no quadruple mutation was identified.

The present study is the first to document the existence of CQ (CVMNK) and SP (ACNCSVI) sensitive haplotypes in a Brazilian field sample. This is a noteworthy result, because in Brazil the totally of P. falciparum parasites were considered to be fully resistant to CQ and SP [18]. This fact was not, however, surprising since the same phenomenon had already been reported in China and Malawi [911]. Then, it could represent the reemergence of CQ and SP sensitive parasites probably due to the spread of wild type allele P. falciparum parasites [21]. Despite the relatively small number of samples, it is suggested that the number of sensitive parasite population detected remains low because CQ is currently is still used for the treatment of malaria vivax cases and SP or its analogues, are used for anti-microbial therapy and, in this way, Plasmodium parasites could still be under drug pressure.

The finding of a single wild SP and CQ isolate will not interfere in drug policy, but this detection is especially remarkable because it might represent a tendency of sensitive haplotypes re-emergence that could gain some importance in the future.

Conclusion

These data reinforce the importance of performing molecular surveillance by continuous chemoresistance assessment, not only to predict shifts of drug resistance of Plasmodium populations following drug policy changes but, particularly, to investigate the possibility of reintroduction of anti-malarial drugs, such as CQ and SP, because of their low cost and wide availability. In this context, the critical problem of P. falciparum chemoresistance could be circumvented by turning-over the use of the drugs, in order to enable the re-emergence of wild sensitive parasites.

Abbreviations

pfcrt

Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter

pfdhfr

Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase

pfdhps

Plasmodium falciparum dihydropteroate synthase

DNA: 

deoxyribonucleic acid

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

SNPs: 

single-nucleotide polymorphisms

CQ: 

chloroquine

SP: 

sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are deeply grateful to Paulo Renato Rivas Totino, Evelyn Kety Pratt Riccio, Lilian Rose Pratt Riccio and Clarissa Perez Faria that kindly provided blood samples for this study. We would also like to thank the staff from the Genomic Platform/PDTIS/Fiocruz.

This work was financially supported by POM/PEF/Instituto Oswaldo Cruz and CNPq/PAPES-Fiocruz, FAPERJ and CAPES programs (Brazil).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Malaria Research, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz
(2)
Laboratory of Infectiology and Parasitology, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
(3)
Ambulatory and Laboratory of Malaria Clinical Assays, Secretariat of Health Vigilance, Instituto Evandro Chagas
(4)
Laboratory of Entomology, LACEN

References

  1. Zalis MG, Pang L, Silveira MS, Milhous WK, Wirth DF: Characterization of Plasmodium falciparum isolated from the Amazon region of Brazil: evidence for quinine resistance. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 58: 630-637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Vasconcelos KF, Plowe CV, Fontes CJ, Kyle D, Wirth DF, Pereira da Silva LH, Zalis MG: Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase of isolates from the Amazon region of Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000, 95: 721-728. 10.1590/S0074-02762000000500020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alecrim WD, Dourado H, Alecrim M, das G, Passos LF, Wanssa E, Albuquerque B: In vivo resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to the combination of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine, at RIII level, in Amazonas, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1982, 24 (6 Suppl): 52-53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. da Silva J, Lopes PF, Ferreira LF, Morteo R, Navieira JB: Resistance of P. falciparum to the action of chloroquine. Hospital (Rio J). 1961, 60: 581-594.Google Scholar
  5. Souza JM: Epidemiological distribution of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in Brazil and its relevance to the treatment and control of malaria. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1992, 87: 343-348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrade JG, Andrade AL, Araujo ES, Oliveira RM, Silva AS, Martelli CM, Zicker F: A randomized clinical trial with high dose of chloroquine for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1992, 34 (5): 467-473.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Camargo LMA, Oliveira S, Basano S, Garcia CRS: Antimalarials and the fight against malaria in Brazil. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009, 5: 1-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. WHO: Malaria treatment update. [http://www.who.int/malaria/rbm/Attachment/20041108/pr8nov2004.htm]
  9. Mita T, Kaneko A, Lum JK, Bwijo B, Takechi M, Zungu IL, Tsukahara T, Tanabe K, Kobayakawa T, Bjorkman A: Recovery of chloroquine sensitivity and low prevalence of the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene mutation K76T following the discontinuance of chloroquine use in Malawi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 413-415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kublin JG, Cortese JF, Njunju EM, Mukadam RA, Wirima JJ, Kazembe PN, Djimde AA, Kouriba B, Taylor TE, Plowe CV: Reemergence of chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum malaria after cessation of chloroquine use in Malawi. J Infect Dis. 2003, 187: 1870-1875. 10.1086/375419.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang X, Mu J, Li G, Chen P, Guo X, Fu L, Chen L, Su X, Wellems TE: Decreased prevalence of the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter 76T marker associated with cessation of chloroquine use against P. falciparum malaria in Hainan, People's Republic of China. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 72: 410-414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhou Z, Griffing SM, de Oliveira AM, McCollum AM, Quezada WM, Arrospide N, Escalante AA, Udhayakumar V: Decline in sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine-resistant alleles after change in drug policy in the Amazon region of Peru. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008, 52: 739-741. 10.1128/AAC.00975-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bacon DJ, McCollum AM, Griffing SM, Salas C, Soberon V, Santolalla M, Haley R, Tsukayama P, Lucas C, Escalante AA, Udhayakumar V: Dynamics of malaria drug resistance patterns in the Amazon basin region following changes in Peruvian national treatment policy for uncomplicated malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 2042-2051. 10.1128/AAC.01677-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Talisuna AO, Bloland P, D'Alessandro U: History, dynamics and public health importance of malaria parasite resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17: 235-254. 10.1128/CMR.17.1.235-254.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pearce RJ, Drakeley C, Chandramohan D, Mosha F, Roper C: Molecular determination of point mutation haplotypes in the dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase of Plasmodium falciparum in three districts of northern Tanzania. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47: 1347-1354. 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1347-1354.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Otto TD, Vasconcellos EA, Gomes LHF, Moreira AS, Degrave WM, Mendonça-Lima L, Alves-Ferreira M: ChromaPipe: a pipeline for analysis, quality control and management for a DNA sequencing facility. Genet Mol Res. 2008, 7: 861-871. 10.4238/vol7-3X-Meeting04.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Plowe CV, Cortese JF, Djimde A, Nwanyanwu OC, Watkins WM, Winstanley PA, Estrada-Franco JG, Mollinedo RE, Avila JC, Cespedes JL, Carter D, Doumbo OK: Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase and epidemiologic patterns of pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine use and resistance. J Infect Dis. 1997, 176: 1590-1596. 10.1086/514159.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vieira PP, Ferreira MU, Alecrim MG, Alecrim WD, da Silva LH, Sihuincha MM, Joy DA, Mu J, Su XZ, Zalis MG: Pfcrt polymorphism and the spread of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum populations across the Amazon Basin. J Infect Dis. 2004, 190: 417-424. 10.1086/422006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ahmed A, Bararia D, Vinayak S, Yameen M, Biswas S, Dev V, Kumar A, Ansari MA, Sharma YD: Plasmodium falciparum isolates in India exhibit a progressive increase in mutations associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 879-889. 10.1128/AAC.48.3.879-889.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Contreras CE, Cortese JF, Caraballo A, Plowe CV: Genetics of drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Venezuelan state of Bolivar. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 67: 400-405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mita T, Kaneko A, Lum JK, Zungu IL, Tsukahara T, Eto H, Kobayakawa T, Björkman A, Tanabe K: Expansion of wild type allele rather than back mutation in pfcrt explains the recent recovery of chloroquine sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum in Malawi. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004, 135: 159-163. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.01.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gama et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement