Open Access

Comparison of Plasmodium falciparum allelic frequency distribution in different endemic settings by high-resolution genotyping

  • Sonja Schoepflin1,
  • Francesca Valsangiacomo1,
  • Enmoore Lin2,
  • Benson Kiniboro2,
  • Ivo Mueller2 and
  • Ingrid Felger1Email author
Malaria Journal20098:250

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-250

Received: 03 July 2009

Accepted: 30 October 2009

Published: 30 October 2009

Abstract

Background

The diversity of genotyping markers of Plasmodium falciparum depends on transmission intensity. It has been reported that the diversity of the merozoite surface protein 2 (msp2) is greater in areas of high compared to low endemicity, however, results for msp1 were inconsistent. These previous reports relied on low resolution genotyping techniques.

Methods

In the present study, a high-resolution capillary electrophoresis-based technique was applied to genotype samples from areas of different endemicity in Papua New Guinea and Tanzania. For both endemic settings, the diversity of msp1 and msp2 was investigated; the mean multiplicity of infection (MOI) and the FST values were determined to investigate whether more accurate sizing generates different results.

Results and Conclusion

The results of the present study confirmed previous reports of a higher mean MOI for both marker genes and increased genetic diversity in areas of higher endemicity as estimated by the total number of distinct alleles for msp2. For msp1 a minor increase in diversity was observed. Measures of between population variance in allele frequencies (FST) indicated little genetic differentiation for both marker genes between the two populations from different endemic settings. MOI adjusted for the probability of multiple infections sharing the same allele was estimated by using the msp2 allele frequency distribution and the distribution of observed numbers of concurrent infections. For the high-resolution typing technique applied in this study, this adjustment made little difference to the estimated mean MOI compared to the observed mean MOI.

Background

Plasmodium falciparum populations are highly diverse and individual hosts are often simultaneously infected by multiple parasite clones. In order to discriminate parasite clones within one host PCR-based genotyping of a number of different marker genes has been established. Among these are the merozoite surface proteins 1 and 2 (msp1 and msp2) and the glutamate-rich protein (glurp), which show extensive length polymorphism and can, therefore, be distinguished by electrophoresis on agarose or polyacrylamide gels.

Recently, capillary electrophoresis (CE) based genotyping of msp2 was shown to have a much higher discriminatory power than previously applied techniques [1]. This technique has been proven useful in areas of high endemicity, where individuals are simultaneously infected with many different parasite clones. It has also been useful for distinguishing recrudescent from new infections after anti-malarial treatment [2] and in tracking individual parasite clones over time in longitudinal surveys, where consecutive blood samples were collected from each individual [1]. Similar to the CE based msp2 genotyping, a CE protocol for genotyping the polymorphic block 2 of the msp1 gene was applied in the present study.

The focus of this study was to assess the impact of transmission intensity on the genetic diversity of the two marker genes msp1 and msp2. Most previous studies have shown a greater diversity for msp2 in high endemic settings [3, 4], but for msp1 conflicting results were reported [512].

These data all relied on low-resolution genotyping consisting of fragment sizing on agarose gels with individual genotypes defined as bins of ≥ 20 base pairs. Using this approach several distinct fragments may be combined within one genotype bin. Greenhouse et al [13] studied the impact of transmission intensity on the accuracy of genotyping and found that with increasing transmission intensity and, therefore, increasing complexity of infection, genotyping becomes less accurate. These findings are not only important for recrudescent-reinfection typing in anti-malarial drug trials, but also for assessing the impact of transmission intensity on genetic diversity. The authors concluded that a genotyping technique with higher discriminatory power is needed for genotyping samples from areas of high transmission intensity. In the study presented here an improved high-resolution genotyping approach was applied to P. falciparum infected samples from Papua New Guinea (PNG) and Tanzania (TZ). These study sites differ extensively in their transmission intensity with entomological inoculation rates of >300 infective bites per person per year reported for TZ [14, 15] and approximately 35 infective bites per person per year for PNG [16]. The main question was to assess whether the previously observed difference in msp1 and msp2 diversity in different endemic settings is independent of technical approaches or whether more sensitive detection of allelic size differences would alter these previous results. For direct standardized comparison the same genotyping technique was applied for all samples.

Methods

The msp1 and msp2 loci were subject to high-resolution genotyping in two sets of DNA samples that had been PCR positive in previous tests. 108 samples from PNG were derived from a longitudinal field survey in one- to four-year old children, conducted in an area near Maprik, East Sepik Province (Lin et al, personal communication). Scientific approval and ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the Medical Research and Advisory Committee (MRAC) of the Ministry of Health in PNG and from the Ethikkommission beider Basel in Switzerland. Informed consent was sought from all parents or guardians prior to recruitment of each child. 115 Tanzanian samples were derived from the placebo group of a vaccine efficacy trial conducted from 1993-1994 in children below five years of age in the village Idete, which is located in the Kilombero District of Morogoro Region, Tanzania [17]. A genotyping study performed in these trial participants has been published previously [18], where the same marker gene msp2, but a different typing technique had been used. Both sets of samples derive from studies where morbid episodes were closely followed and anti-malarial treatment was readily available. In both sites, newly introduced drugs were administered, without evidence for existing drug resistance in these areas.

Prior to PCR amplification of the msp1 and msp2 target sequence, DNA was extracted from cell pellets using QIAamp® 96 DNA Blood Kits (Qiagen, Australia) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Msp2 genotyping was performed as previously described by Falk et al [1], with some minor changes and adaptations of PCR conditions for highly purified DNA. In brief, primary PCR reaction conditions were adjusted to a final volume of 50 μl including 2 μl of extracted DNA. Cycle conditions for primary PCR were 2 min at 94°C followed by 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 45°C, 90 s at 70°C, and a final extension at 70°C for 10 min. In order to reduce the carry over of primary PCR primers into the nested PCR, only one μl of primary PCR product was amplified in the nested PCR reaction with the following cycle conditions: 2 min at 94°C followed by 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at 50°C, 90 s at 70°C and a final extension at 70°C for 10 min.

Msp1 occurs as one of three distinct allelic families: K1, MAD20 and RO33. The unique family specific sequences K1 and MAD20 flank intragenic repeat units that give rise to extensive size polymorphisms, whereas RO33 is not polymorphic. For amplification of the polymorphic region of msp1 block 2 [19], a nested PCR approach was used. Primary PCR was performed in a total volume of 50 μl containing 5 μl of 10 × BufferB (0.8 M Tris-HCl, 0.2 M (NH4)2SO4, 0.2% w/v Tween-20), 2 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs, 2.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (FirePol, Solis BioDyne). Primary PCR primers which are located in the conserved sequence spanning the msp1 block2 (M1-OF 5'-CTAGAAGCTTTAGAAGATGCAGTATTG-3' and M1-OR 5'-CTTAAATAGATTCTAATTCAAGTGGATCA-3' [20]) were used at a final concentration of 300 nM each. Two μl of DNA was used as template for this PCR reaction. An initial denaturation step of 94°C for 2 min was followed by 30 amplification cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min at 54°C, 1 min at 72°C and a final extension for 5 min at 72°C.

In the nested PCR reaction, specific primer pairs were used to amplify the allelic families K1, MAD20 and RO33 of msp1 block2. In order to distinguish the size of PCR products by capillary electrophoresis, one of the primers for each PCR was labelled with the fluorescent dyes VIC, NED or 6-FAM, respectively (Applied Biosystems). Size variations due to sporadic addition of adenine by the Taq polymerase at the 3' end were avoided by adding a 7 bp tail (Applied Biosystems) to the 5' end of the other primer promoting the additional adenine incorporation. Primer sequences for nPCR have previously been published [20], but have been modified by fluorescent dyes and 7 bp tails: M1-KF 5'-Tail-AAATGAAGAAGAAATTACTACAAAAGGTGC-3'; M1-KR 5'-NED-GCTTGCATCAGCTGGAGGGCTTGCACCAGA-3'; M1-MF 5'-Tail-AAATGAAGGAACAAGTGGAACAGCTGTTAC-3'; M1-MR 5'-6-FAM-ATCTGAAGGATTTGTACGTCTTGAATTACC-3'. K1 and MAD20 allelic sequences were amplified in a duplex nPCR in a total volume of 50 μl, containing a final primer concentration of 100 nM for each primer, 5 μl of 10 × BufferB (0.8 mM Tris-HCl, 0.2 M (NH4)2SO4, 0.2% w/v Tween-29), 2 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs and 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (FirePol, Solis BioDyne). 1 μl of primary PCR product was used as template for the nested PCR with the following conditions: initial denaturation for 2 min at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min at 59°C, 1 min at 72°C and a final extension for 10 min at 72°C. RO33 allelic sequences were amplified with primers M1-RF 5' VIC-TAAAGGATGGAGCAAATACTCAAGTTGTTG-3' and the reverse primer M1-R2 5' Tail-CAAGTAATTTTGAACTCTATGTTTTAAATCAGCGTA-3' which is located in the conserved region of msp1 block3 and is not family specific. Therefore, RO33 nested PCR was run as a separate reaction under the same conditions as described for K1 and MAD20 nested PCR. All amplifications were performed on a PTC-100 thermocycler (MJ Research Inc.).

Nested PCR products were analysed on a 1.5% agarose gel. Depending on the intensity of the band, PCR products were diluted 1:5 - 1:40 in H2O. 2.5 μl of diluted PCR product was mixed with 0.3 μl GeneScan®-500 LIZ® size standard (Applied Biosystems) and 12 μl HiDi (highly deionized) formamide. The mixture was heated for 5 min at 95°C to separate the double strands and then immediately chilled on ice for a few minutes before capillary electrophoresis was performed on an AB3130 Sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Data were analysed using the GeneMapper® v3.7 Software (Applied Biosystems). The results of size calling were exported as a tab delimited file and imported into an in-house generated software, which calculated for each sample a cut-off based on the mean height of the size standard peaks and grouped all alleles into 3 bp bins. For the cut-off, an empirically defined constant factor was multiplied by the mean size standard for each sample. This constant factor was manually defined after inspecting the background level in single infections. For both marker genes the total number of alleles as well as their frequency distributions were analysed. The theoretical probability of being infected by two parasites with the same allele was calculated as P = Σpi2 where pi is the frequency of allele i [21]. The combined probability that two independent clones share the same genotype for both marker genes was calculated by multiplying the probabilities P for both marker genes, assuming that the two loci sort independently from each other. As a measure for genetic diversity, the expected heterozygosity was calculated by use of the formula HE = [n/(n-1)] × [(1-Σpi2)] [22], where n is the number of samples and pi the frequency of allele i. HE is the probability that two alleles randomly drawn from the population sample are different. The mean multiplicity of infection (MOI) was calculated as the total number of clones divided by the number of positive samples for each marker gene. Allele frequencies were further compared between populations from PNG and TZ using Wright's F statistics to calculate the fixation index FST. FST is a measure of between population variance and gives the proportion of overall diversity which is attributable to differences between populations [23]. HE and FST values were calculated by Arlequin ver3.1 software [24].

Estimates were calculated for both, the frequency distribution and the mean MOI adjusted for the probability of multiple infections sharing the same allele using the msp2 allele frequency distribution and the distribution of observed numbers of infections according to the method of Ross et al (personal communication).

Results and discussion

The distribution of msp1 and msp2 allele frequencies for 108 Papua New Guinean samples is shown in Figure 1. The total number of alleles detected in this sample set is greater for msp2 than msp1, with 35 vs. 24 differently sized alleles, respectively. The overall genetic diversity is also slightly greater for msp2 than msp1 (P = 0.07; HE = 0.933 for msp2 and P = 0.084; HE = 0.918 for msp1). By combining the two marker genes, the probability that two parasite clones share the same genotype by chance can be reduced to 0.0058. Figure 2 shows the allelic frequency distribution of msp1 and msp2 in 115 samples from Tanzania. In the Tanzanian samples, the total number of msp2 alleles detected by CE was much greater than for msp1 with 76 vs. 29 alleles discriminated, respectively. The probability P of being infected by two parasites with the same allele and the expected heterozygosity values HE showed a greater overall diversity for msp2 compared to msp1 (P = 0.036; HE = 0.965 for msp2 and P = 0.085; HE = 0.917 for msp1) in Tanzanian samples. Combining the two marker genes reduced the probability that two parasites share the same genotype by chance to 0.003.
Figure 1

Allelic frequencies of msp1 and msp2 in samples from Papua New Guinea. A. White, grey and black areas indicate frequencies of K1, MAD20 and RO33 alleles, respectively. B. White and grey areas indicate Fc27 and 3D7 allele frequencies, respectively.

Figure 2

Allelic frequencies of msp1 and msp2 in samples from Tanzania. A. White, grey and black areas indicate frequencies of K1, MAD20 and RO33 alleles, respectively. B. White and grey areas indicate Fc27 and 3D7 allele frequencies, respectively.

In both countries, msp1 K1 type alleles were the most polymorphic, followed by MAD20 type alleles, whereas RO33 was non-polymorphic. For msp2, alleles belonging to the 3D7 family showed much more polymorphism than Fc27 type alleles, in both countries (Table 1). For msp1, the most dominant alleles were similar between PNG and TZ. For msp2 the most frequent allele was the same between the two sites whereas the remaining alleles showed a different order of frequency. It is clear that measuring length polymorphism only detects a fraction of diversity in the marker genes. However, for genotyping multiple infections, extensive length polymorphism is ideal for discriminating individual infections. Sequencing would require cloning individual PCR fragments. The variance in allele frequencies between the two study sites was compared using Wright's F statistics. The FST values for pair wise comparisons of allele frequencies between population samples were 0.041 for msp1 and 0.017 for msp2, respectively (p < 0.001 for both markers). These low FST values indicate that allele frequencies are highly similar and that there is little genetic differentiation between the investigated geographic populations for both marker genes. As previously suggested, such low FST values may indicate that the msp1 and msp2 loci are under balancing selection [25], increasing the possibility that observed patterns of allele frequencies are the result of balancing selection rather than of variation in transmission dynamics.
Table 1

Number of different msp1 and msp2 alleles detected in samples from Papua New Guinea and Tanzania

 

Papua New Guinea

Tanzania

Number of different msp1-K1 alleles

13

19

Number of different msp1-MAD20 alleles

10

9

Number of different msp1-RO33 alleles

1

1

Number of different msp2-3D7 alleles

27

59

Number of different msp2-Fc27 alleles

8

17

The quality of genotyping, i.e. optimal differentiation of parasite clones within a blood sample and between samples depends on a number of parameters. It is essential that the chosen marker gene is highly polymorphic. Many genotyping applications require minimization of the probability that two parasites share the same allele by chance. Minimizing this probability is achieved by choosing the most polymorphic marker, but also the allelic frequency distribution plays a crucial role and should be homogeneous. The more homogeneous the distribution of alleles, the more diversity the marker will have [21].

Discrimination can be enhanced by using a second marker gene, which further reduces the probability that two clones share the same genotype by chance. In fact, the number of marker genes that should be used to adequately discriminate parasites can be different between study sites and it has been recommended to choose the number of genes in a way that this probability is below 0.05 [21]. The study presented here has shown that in Tanzania, the msp2 gene is highly diverse with a total of 76 differently sized alleles, and that the probability P of being infected with two parasites sharing the same msp2 genotype is only 3.6%. In contrast, the frequency distribution of the msp1 gene in Tanzania is less favourable, since only 29 alleles could be distinguished and the most common allele has a frequency of >20%. These results suggest that in a high transmission region in Tanzania, where this study was conducted, CE genotyping for msp2 alone provided sufficient discrimination power to adequately differentiate parasites, since the probability P that two parasites share the same genotype was 3.6%. For msp1 however, the genetic diversity was not sufficient for use as a single genotyping marker. The number of alleles was greater for both marker genes in Tanzanian samples than in samples from Papua New Guinea (msp1: 24 vs. 29; msp2: 35 vs. 76 in PNG vs. TZ, respectively, Table 2). Although the overall genetic diversity in PNG was slightly greater for msp2 than for msp1 with 35 vs. 24 alleles, the diversity of msp2 in this area was not high enough for msp2 to be used as a single marker for genotyping. This is due to a high probability (7%) of being infected with two parasites sharing the same allele by chance, which is above the 5% threshold suggested by Gatton & Cheng [21]. Therefore, genotyping of both msp2 and msp1 is required in order to increase discriminatory power in this area. Combining the two marker genes reduced the probability that two parasites share the same genotype by chance to 0.6%. In an area of lower transmission, genotyping two or more markers is clearly an option for single clone infections as msp1-msp2 haplotypes are evident. In the case of frequent multiple clone infections, this strategy is less beneficial as both markers are unlinked and msp1-msp2 haplotypes cannot be determined. This shortfall poses a serious handicap if an individual parasite clone needs to be followed up over time in a longitudinal series of samples. Other applications, e.g. identification of new infections, are well suited for combining several markers.
Table 2

Diversity of msp1 and msp2 in samples from Papua New Guinea and Tanzania

 

Papua New Guinea

Tanzania

 

msp2

msp1

msp2

msp1

Number of samples (n)

108

108

115

115

Number of alleles

35

24

76

29

Frequency of most common allele

15.08%

16.28%

11.21%

20.57%

Number of clones

199

215

428

350

Mean MOI*

1.84

1.99

3.72§

3.04§

HE**

0.933

0.918

0.965

0.917

P = Σpi2

0.07

0.084

0.036

0.085

Combined probability***

0.0058

 

0.003

 

* MOI = mean multiplicity of infection

** HE = expected heterozygosity. This is defined as the probability that two randomly chosen alleles are different in the population.

*** The combined probability that two independent clones share the same genotype for both marker genes was calculated by multiplying the probabilities P for both marker genes.

§ Indicates significant difference between mean MOI of msp1 and msp2 (p < 0.001)

Mean MOI was significantly greater in Tanzania than in PNG for both marker genes (msp1: 1.99 vs. 3.04; p < 0.001 and msp2: 1.84 vs. 3.72, p < 0.001 for PNG vs. TZ, respectively, Table 2), which confirms previous observations of an increased complexity of infection with increasing endemicity [3, 26]. In Tanzanian samples, the mean MOI was significantly greater for msp2 than for msp1 (p < 0.001), which reflects the great difference in the number of distinct alleles between the two allelic families. Despite the fact that the number of alleles was also greater for msp2 than for msp1 in PNG, the mean multiplicity of infection was slightly higher for msp1, however, this difference was not statistically significant. This minor difference in mean MOI might be due to various technical reasons like differences in PCR efficiency for the two marker genes, which results in different detection limits. Another parameter that influences the number of genotypes per sample is the cut-off that is determined for each sample, which is dependent on the internal size standard used to control for unequal loading of the PCR product onto the automated sequencer. The use of two markers obviously produces minor discrepancies due to technical differences, but does not affect the overall MOI result.

Because MOI was considerably higher in samples from TZ than in those from PNG, the total number of clones used for assessing diversity differed between the two data sets. This could have biased the results in that the diversity in PNG would be under-estimated by observing fewer clones. Therefore, the analysis of the msp2 diversity was repeated with a two-fold increased number of samples from PNG, so that the total number of clones was approximately equal in both data sets (data shown in additional files 1 and 2). A minor increase in the number of distinct alleles was observed, with four newly observed alleles occurring only 1-3 times. Thus, comparing approximately 400 clones from each site did not yield a different estimate of diversity as opposed to comparing approximately 100 blood samples form each site. The expected heterozygosity HE and the probability P that two parasites share the same allele by chance remained similar.

The results obtained by applying this high-resolution genotyping technique revealed similar results to previous reports on allelic diversities in three areas of different malaria endemicity in Brazil, Vietnam and Tanzania, where the extent of allelic diversity of msp2 as estimated by the total number of distinct alleles increased with increasing endemicity [4]. The same populations were also investigated for genetic diversity in the msp1 gene. In contrast to msp2, the extent of msp1 diversity did not seem to correlate with the level of malaria transmission in these regions [59]. The present observations of only a minor effect of transmission intensity on diversity of msp1 confirmed these previous findings. An increased diversity of msp2 in areas of higher endemicity was also reported previously [3, 10, 11, 27], however, most of these studies also reported a correlation between endemicity and the number of distinct alleles for msp1, which was not the case for the comparison of diversity between Brazil, Vietnam and Tanzania and in the present study. There were also some studies that did not find a correlation between transmission intensity and genetic diversity for both marker genes [12, 28, 29].

The findings presented here might have implications for genotyping samples from drug efficacy trials where recrudescence must be reliably distinguished from new infections and the probability of new infecting parasites having the same allele as the initial infecting parasite should be as low as possible. The data presented here suggest that for this purpose msp2 is the more suitable marker gene than msp1 in both study sites. Genotyping only msp1 would not provide adequate discriminatory power according to the standards suggested by Gatton and Cheng [21] as the probability of being reinfected with the same genotype is 8.5%. In areas of lower transmission intensity, such as in PNG, genotyping only one marker gene (either msp1 or msp2) will not provide enough discriminatory power and two markers are necessary to improve discrimination power. In highly endemic areas like Tanzania, the resolution obtained with msp2 might be sufficient to discriminate all concurrent clones within an individual, as the probability of multiple parasites sharing the same allele is low. However, the high mean MOI in this area is likely to lower the discriminatory power. This effect of high MOI on the resolution of genotyping markers has so far been given little attention [13] in genotyping studies. It is of relevance in particular for genotyping of recrudescences in highly endemic areas, because high MOI increases the probability of super-infected parasite clones to carry the same genotype. Therefore an attempt was made to estimate the true number of alleles present in a host, allowing for this probability. Details of the estimation approach are being published elsewhere (Ross et al, personal communication). Table 3 lists the probability of observed infections conditional on the true number of infections based on the PNG allelic frequencies. Adjustment for the probability of multiple infections sharing the same msp2 allele made little difference to the estimated MOI (estimated mean MOI was 1.84 in PNG, 3.99 in Tanzania compared to the unadjusted values of 1.84 in PNG and 3.72 in TZ, respectively). This reflects the low probability of being infected with two parasites sharing the same allele with such a high-resolution typing system.
Table 3

Probability of each number of observed infections, conditional on the true number of infections

 

1

2

3

4

5

1

1

0.068

0.007

0.0008

9.38E-05

2

 

0.931

0.185

0.0358

0.007077

3

  

0.808

0.3108

0.097212

4

   

0.6526

0.404946

5

    

0.490671

Rows indicate the number of observed infections, whereas columns represent the true number of infections. Results are shown for MOI ≤ 5.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the CE-based genotyping, which provides highly accurate fragment sizing data, is in line with previous findings on genetic diversity in different geographic locations. A higher mean MOI for both marker genes was found in an area of more intense malaria transmission. Msp2 diversity was higher in the high transmission area, but msp1 only showed a minor increase in diversity. The between population variance in allele frequencies, as estimated by Wright's F statistics, was found to be very low for both marker genes. This indicates that there was little genetic differentiation between the two sites of different endemicity and suggests that the observed patterns of allele frequencies are independent of transmission intensity.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the study participants and their parents or legal guardians from PNG and TZ, as well as the staff from the PNG Institute of Medical Research and the Ifakara Health Institute who carried out the field work. We thank Peter A Zimmerman for contributing to the study design. We are also grateful to Amanda Ross and Tom Smith for estimation of the true multiplicity of infection. The authors thank the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 112196) and the National Institute of Health (NIH) for financial support. S.S. was supported by the Forlen Foundation. The authors declare that they have no financial or any other association to the work reported which might pose any conflict of interest.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Swiss Tropical Institute
(2)
Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research

References

  1. Falk N, Maire N, Sama W, Owusu-Agyei S, Smith T, Beck HP, Felger I: Comparison of PCR-RFLP and Genescan-based genotyping for analyzing infection dynamics of Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 74: 944-950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jafari S, Le BJ, Bouchaud O, Durand R: Plasmodium falciparum clonal population dynamics during malaria treatment. J Infect Dis. 2004, 189: 195-203. 10.1086/380910.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Babiker HA, Lines J, Hill WG, Walliker D: Population structure of Plasmodium falciparum in villages with different malaria endemicity in east Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997, 56: 141-147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoffmann EH, da Silveira LA, Tonhosolo R, Pereira FJ, Ribeiro WL, Tonon AP, Kawamoto F, Ferreira MU: Geographical patterns of allelic diversity in the Plasmodium falciparum malaria-vaccine candidate, merozoite surface protein-2. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2001, 95: 117-132. 10.1080/00034980120045833.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. da Silveira LA, Dorta ML, Kimura EA, Katzin AM, Kawamoto F, Tanabe K, Ferreira MU: Allelic diversity and antibody recognition of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 1 during hypoendemic malaria transmission in the Brazilian amazon region. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 5906-5916.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferreira MU, Liu Q, Kimura M, Ndawi BT, Tanabe K, Kawamoto F: Allelic diversity in the merozoite surface protein-1 and epidemiology of multiple-clone Plasmodium falciparum infections in northern Tanzania. J Parasitol. 1998, 84: 1286-1289. 10.2307/3284693.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferreira MU, Liu Q, Zhou M, Kimura M, Kaneko O, Van TH, Isomura S, Tanabe K, Kawamoto F: Stable patterns of allelic diversity at the merozoite surface protein-1 locus of Plasmodium falciparum in clinical isolates from southern Vietnam. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1998, 45: 131-136. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1998.tb05080.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaneko O, Kimura M, Kawamoto F, Ferreira MU, Tanabe K: Plasmodium falciparum: allelic variation in the merozoite surface protein 1 gene in wild isolates from southern Vietnam. Exp Parasitol. 1997, 86: 45-57. 10.1006/expr.1997.4147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Silva NS, Silveira LA, Machado RL, Povoa MM, Ferreira MU: Temporal and spatial distribution of the variants of merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1) in Plasmodium falciparum populations in Brazil. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2000, 94: 675-688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Konate L, Zwetyenga J, Rogier C, Bischoff E, Fontenille D, Tall A, Spiegel A, Trape JF, Mercereau-Puijalon O: Variation of Plasmodium falciparum msp1 block 2 and msp2 allele prevalence and of infection complexity in two neighbouring Senegalese villages with different transmission conditions. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 93 (Suppl 1): 21-28. 10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90323-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Paul RE, Day KP: Mating patterns of Plasmodium falciparum. Parasitol Today. 1998, 14: 197-202. 10.1016/S0169-4758(98)01226-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bendixen M, Msangeni HA, Pedersen BV, Shayo D, Bodker R: Diversity of Plasmodium falciparum populations and complexity of infections in relation to transmission intensity and host age: a study from the Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 95: 143-148. 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90140-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenhouse B, Dokomajilar C, Hubbard A, Rosenthal PJ, Dorsey G: Impact of transmission intensity on the accuracy of genotyping to distinguish recrudescence from new infection in antimalarial clinical trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007, 51: 3096-3103. 10.1128/AAC.00159-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Charlwood JD, Smith T, Lyimo E, Kitua AY, Masanja H, Booth M, Alonso PL, Tanner M: Incidence of Plasmodium falciparum infection in infants in relation to exposure to sporozoite-infected anophelines. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 59: 243-251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith T, Charlwood JD, Kihonda J, Mwankusye S, Billingsley P, Meuwissen J, Lyimo E, Takken W, Teuscher T, Tanner M: Absence of seasonal variation in malaria parasitaemia in an area of intense seasonal transmission. Acta Trop. 1993, 54: 55-72. 10.1016/0001-706X(93)90068-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith T, Hii JL, Genton B, Muller I, Booth M, Gibson N, Narara A, Alpers MP: Associations of peak shifts in age--prevalence for human malarias with bednet coverage. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 95: 1-6. 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90314-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Alonso PL, Tanner M, Smith T, Hayes RJ, Schellenberg JA, Lopez MC, de Bastos AI, Menendez C, Lyimo E, Weiss N, Kilama WL, Teuscher T: A trial of the synthetic malaria vaccine SPf66 in Tanzania: rationale and design. Vaccine. 1994, 12: 181-186. 10.1016/0264-410X(94)90058-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Beck HP, Felger I, Huber W, Steiger S, Smith T, Weiss N, Alonso P, Tanner M: Analysis of multiple Plasmodium falciparum infections in Tanzanian children during the phase III trial of the malaria vaccine SPf66. J Infect Dis. 1997, 175: 921-926. 10.1086/513991.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller LH, Roberts T, Shahabuddin M, McCutchan TF: Analysis of sequence diversity in the Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1). Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993, 59: 1-14. 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90002-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Snounou G, Zhu X, Siripoon N, Jarra W, Thaithong S, Brown KN, Viriyakosol S: Biased distribution of msp1 and msp2 allelic variants in Plasmodium falciparum populations in Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 93: 369-374. 10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90120-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gatton ML, Cheng Q: Can estimates of antimalarial efficacy from field studies be improved?. Trends Parasitol. 2008, 24: 68-73.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nei M: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. 1987, New York, USA: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Nei M, Chesser RK: Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann Hum Genet. 1983, 47: 253-259. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1983.tb00993.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider L: Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online. 2005Google Scholar
  25. Conway DJ: Natural selection on polymorphic malaria antigens and the search for a vaccine. Parasitol Today. 1997, 13: 26-29. 10.1016/S0169-4758(96)10077-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Paul RE, Packer MJ, Walmsley M, Lagog M, Ranford-Cartwright LC, Paru R, Day KP: Mating patterns in malaria parasite populations of Papua New Guinea. Science. 1995, 269: 1709-1711. 10.1126/science.7569897.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Haddad D, Snounou G, Mattei D, Enamorado IG, Figueroa J, Stahl S, Berzins K: Limited genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum in field isolates from Honduras. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 60: 30-34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Montoya L, Maestre A, Carmona J, Lopes D, Do RV, Blair S: Plasmodium falciparum: diversity studies of isolates from two Colombian regions with different endemicity. Exp Parasitol. 2003, 104: 14-19. 10.1016/S0014-4894(03)00112-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Peyerl-Hoffmann G, Jelinek T, Kilian A, Kabagambe G, Metzger WG, von SF: Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum and its relationship to parasite density in an area with different malaria endemicities in West Uganda. Trop Med Int Health. 2001, 6: 607-613. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00761.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Schoepflin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.