Skip to content

Advertisement

Malaria Journal

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Distribution of ace-1 R and resistance to carbamates and organophosphates in Anopheles gambiae s.s. populations from Côte d'Ivoire

  • Ludovic P Ahoua Alou1, 2,
  • Alphonsine A Koffi1Email author,
  • Maurice A Adja1, 2,
  • Emmanuel Tia3,
  • Philippe K Kouassi2,
  • Moussa Koné1 and
  • Fabrice Chandre4
Malaria Journal20109:167

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-167

Received: 1 March 2010

Accepted: 16 June 2010

Published: 16 June 2010

Abstract

Background

The spread of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.s. is a critical issue for malaria vector control based on the use of insecticide-treated nets. Carbamates and organophosphates insecticides are regarded as alternatives or supplements to pyrethroids used in nets treatment. It is, therefore, essential to investigate on the susceptibility of pyrethroid resistant populations of An. gambiae s.s. to these alternative products.

Methods

In September 2004, a cross sectional survey was conducted in six localities in Côte d'Ivoire: Toumbokro, Yamoussoukro, Toumodi in the Southern Guinea savannah, Tiassalé in semi-deciduous forest, then Nieky and Abidjan in evergreen forest area. An. gambiae populations from these localities were previously reported to be highly resistant to pyrethroids insecticides. Anopheline larvae were collected from the field and reared to adults. Resistance/susceptibility to carbamates (0.4% carbosulfan, 0.1% propoxur) and organophosphates (0.4% chlorpyrifos-methyl, 1% fenitrothion) was assessed using WHO bioassay test kits for adult mosquitoes. Then, PCR assays were run to determine the molecular forms (M) and (S), as well as phenotypes for insensitive acetylcholinesterase (AChE1) due to G119S mutation.

Results

Bioassays showed carbamates (carbosulfan and propoxur) resistance in all tested populations of An. gambiae s.s. In addition, two out of the six tested populations (Toumodi and Tiassalé) were also resistant to organophosphates (mortality rates ranged from 29.5% to 93.3%). The M-form was predominant in tested samples (91.8%). M and S molecular forms were sympatric at two localities but no M/S hybrids were detected. The highest proportion of S-form (7.9% of An. gambiae identified) was in sample from Toumbokro, in the southern Guinea savannah. The G119S mutation was found in both M and S molecular forms with frequency from 30.9 to 35.2%.

Conclusion

This study revealed a wide distribution of insensitive acetylcholinesterase due to the G119S mutation in both M and S molecular forms of the populations of An. gambiae s.s. tested. The low cross-resistance between carbamates and organophosphates highly suggests involvement of other resistance mechanisms such as metabolic detoxification or F290V mutation.

Background

Malaria vectors control mainly relies on the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITN) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). Pyrethroids are the only group of insecticides currently recommended for net treatment [1]. Although pyrethroid resistance in the most important malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. has become widespread in several African countries [25], field studies in experimental huts and at community level using malaria indicators have shown that pyrethroid-treated bed nets remain usually effective against pyrethroid resistant mosquitoes [69]. However, the evolution of pyrethroid resistance in An. gambiae s.s. represent a threat for malaria control. To prevent any significant decline of the efficiency of pyrethroids, harmful to the malaria control, management strategies of pyrethroid resistance are envisaged through the exploration of news tools or combination of existing ones.

One of these strategies, used in agriculture as well as in public health, consists to associate in the same treatment, several molecules having different modes of action. Although developed initially for agricultural use and for indoor residual spraying, carbamates and organophosphates constitute a new prospect to circumvent pyrethroid resistance in An. gambiae s.s.

In area of high prevalence of kdr in Côte d'Ivoire, experimental hut trials of carbamates or organophosphates alone and in combination with pyrethroids on mosquito nets showed very promising results [8, 1013]. However, little is known about the susceptibility status of pyrethroid resistance populations of An. gambiae to organophosphates and carbamates in Côte d'Ivoire, as well as potential resistance mechanisms.

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is a common target for carbamates and organophosphates. These insecticides blocks transmission of nerve impulses by irreversible inhibition of AChE at cholinergic synapses, causing insect death. Cross-resistance to carbamates and organophosphates can arise by insensitive AChE mechanism due to the glycine to serine substitution (G119S mutation) resulting from a single point mutation in the ace-1 gene [14]. The G119S mutation was selected independently in several mosquitoes species including An. gambiae s.s., the major malaria vector in Africa [11, 1417]. This mutation was found in both M and S molecular forms of An. gambiae from Côte d'Ivoire [16, 17].

In the current study, the geographic extent of insensitive AChE mechanism in An. gambiae s.s. populations from Côte d'Ivoire according to molecular forms, as well as their susceptibility status to carbamates and organophosphates were investigated.

Methods

Mosquito populations and sampling sites

The study sites form a north-to-south transect across the Southern Guinea savannah, the semi-deciduous forest and the evergreen forest areas in Côte d'Ivoire. The last two zones are characterized by intensive human activities and agricultural land-degraded forest mosaic. Mosquitoes were collected during the rainy season from six localities: Toumbokro (7°N; 5°35' W), Yamoussoukro (6°82' N; 5°28' W) and Toumodi (6°55' N; 5°03' W) located in the Southern Guinea savannah, Tiassalé (5°88' N; 4°38' W) in a semi-deciduous forest area, then Nieky (5°20'N; 4°10'W) and Abidjan (5°33'N; 4°03' W) in a evergreen forest area (Figure 1). Samples were collected from coffee and cocoa industrial plantations in Toumbokro, banana cultivation fields in Nieky and in urban areas in Yamoussoukro, Toumodi, Tiassalé and Abidjan. Mosquitoes were collected at larval stage, brought to the laboratory and reared until for emergence of adults. A reference laboratory strain of An. gambiae s.s. named "Kisumu", native from Kenya and susceptible to all insecticides was used as control.
Figure 1

Map of Côte d'Ivoire showing the localities in the different ecological zones where anopheline mosquitoes were collected

Susceptibility test

Bioassays were carried out using WHO test kits for adults mosquitoes [18] with four insecticides of technical grade quality: two carbamates (0.4% carbosulfan, 0.1% propoxur) and two organophosphates (0.4% chlorpyrifos-methyl and 1% fenitrothion). Filter papers were impregnated according to WHO specifications by the Institut Pierre Richet de Bouaké. Papers were stored at 4°C and were not used more than three times.

Tests were performed with batches of 25 unfed females of An. gambiae s.s., 2-5 days old, four replicates per insecticide. Mosquitoes were exposed to the insecticide treated papers for 60 min at 27 ± 1°C and 80% relative humidity. After exposure, mosquitoes were kept in observation tubes, supplied with 10% honey solution and held for 24 h before scoring mortality. Batches exposed to untreated papers were used as control.

M/S taxon determination

According to previous studies, An. gambiae complex in Côte d'Ivoire was only represented by An. melas on the Atlantic littoral area and An. gambiae s.s., the most widespread all over the country [1921]. So the PCR analysis in this study was carried directly on the molecular forms of An. gambiae s.s.. Genomic DNA was extracted from individual mosquitoes according to Collins et al[22] and used for PCR analysis to determine M/S taxon according to Favia et al[23]. The PCR conditions were 10 min at 94°C as initial step, followed by 29 cycles (94°C for 30 seconds, 63°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 30 seconds). After the last cycle the products were finally extended for 7 min at 72°C. Primers used in the PCR were: R5 5'GCCAATCCGAGCTGATAGCGC3', R3 5'CGAATTCTAGGGAGCTCCAG3', Mopint 5'GCCCCTTCCTCGATGGCAT3', B/S 5'ACCAAGATGGTTCGTTGC3'. Amplified fragments were analysed on a 1.5% agarose gel.

DNA diagnostic test for insensitive acetylcholinesterase G119S mutation

Genomic DNA extracted from the field samples and used for PCR was also used to determine the phenotypes for insensitive AChE G119S mutation according to Weill et al[16]. The DNA was PCR amplified with the primers Ex3Agdir 5'GATCGTGGACACCGTGTTCG3' and Ex3Agrev 5'AGGATGGCCCGCTGGAACAG3' for an initial denaturation step of 3 min at 94°C, followed by thirty-five cycles (94°C for 30 seconds, 62°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 20 seconds). After the final cycle the products were extended for 5 min at 72°C. The PCR fragments were then digested with Alu I restriction enzyme and fractionated on a 2% agarose gel. The two primers produced a 403 bp fragment, which is undigested by Alu I for susceptible homozygous mosquitoes (SS), and cut into two fragments (253 bp and 150 bp) for homozygous resistant (RR). Heterozygous individuals (RS) display a combined pattern.

Data analysis

Mortality data were analysed according to WHO [18]. To compare the status of insecticide resistance, Fisher's exact test was performed to determine if there was any significant difference between mortality rates of two given populations of An. gambiae s.s. using Statistica 6.0. Allelic frequencies of G119S mutation were analysed using the version 3.2a of Genepop [24]. To assess if the mutation frequencies was identical across populations, the test of genotypic differentiation was performed [25].

Results

Susceptibility to carbamates and organophosphates

Mortality rates of the Kisumu reference strain to all insecticides was 100% (Table 1). Conversely, all the field samples were resistant to carbamates, with mortalities rates less than 83%. Susceptibility to chlorpyrifos-methyl was assessed on five populations except on the Yamoussoukro population. Chlorpyrifos-methyl resistance was detected in Toumodi and Tiassalé, with 82-94% mortality rates, while it was suspected in Toumbokro with 97% mortality rate. The two other populations were fully susceptible to this organophosphate. Fenitrothion resistance was observed in five out of the six populations tested (Toumbokro, Toumodi, Tiassalé, Nieky, Abidjan). Only the Yamoussoukro population was fully susceptible to this insecticide. Overall the two populations from Toumodi and Tiassalé were resistant to all insecticides used. Tiassalé sample was the most resistant to carbamates and organophosphates with mortality rates of 3% and 12% for carbosulfan and propoxur and 83% and 30% for chlorpyrifos-methyl and fenitrothion, respectively.
Table 1

Mortality of a susceptible strain (Kisumu) and wild populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. exposed to diagnostic doses of technical material of insecticides

 

Carbosulfan (0.4%)

Propoxur (0.1%)

Chlorpyrifos-methyl (0.4%)

Fenitrothion (1%)

Localities

Mort

Status

Mort

Status

Mort

Status

Mort

Status

Kisumu

100 (101)

S

100 (104)

S

100 (104)

S

100 (102)

S

Toumbokro

21.4b (98)

R

40.9b (88)

R

96.9 (97)

S

89.5bc (105)

R

Yamoussoukro

42.3d (104)

R

69.7c (99)

R

NT

 

99.0 (98)

S

Toumodi

28.4bc (95)

R

56.3c (96)

R

93.3b (89)

R

81.1b (95)

R

Tiassalé

2.8a (217)

R

11.6a (224)

R

82.8a (192)

R

29.5a (207)

R

Nieky

28.2bc (103)

R

82.8d (99)

R

100 (102)

S

95.7c (92)

R

Abidjan

39.0cd (100)

R

58.4c (101)

R

100 (102)

S

96.0c (99)

R

Number of tested mosquitoes in parentheses; NT: no tested; Mort: Mortality rate 24 h post exposure; S: indicates susceptibility; R: suggests resistance.

NB: Numbers in the same column with the same superscript do not differ significantly by Fisher's exact test (p > 0.05)

Molecular forms and frequencies of the G119S mutation

All PCR analysis to determine M/S molecular forms realized in this study were positive, showing either the form M or the form S. So it was not necessary to make the PCR analysis for species identification [26].

Three hundred twenty-eight mosquitoes were identified to molecular forms and analyzed for the G119S mutation; results are shown in Table 2. The M and S molecular forms of An. gambiae s.s. occurred in sympatry in two of the six localities, namely Toumbokro and Toumodi in the savannah area. However, the M-form was predominant in the six areas, representing 91.8% of the whole sample (n = 328). In sympatric areas, the frequencies of the S-form were 41.9% (n = 62) and 1.3% (n = 76) respectively in Toumbokro and Toumodi. However, no M/S heterozygote was found.
Table 2

Acetylcholinesterase phenotypes and frequency of G119S mutation in the molecular M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s

Locality

M Form

S Form

 

Phenotypes

  

Phenotypes

  
 

S

RS

R

F(G119S)%

(%)*

S

RS

R

F(G119S)%

(%)*

Toumbokro

12

24

0

33.3 b

58.1

8

18

0

34.6

41.9

Yamoussoukro

7

24

0

38.7 b

100

0

0

0

_

0

Toumodi

47

28

0

18.6 a

98.7

0

1

0

50.0

1.3

Tiassalé

0

82

0

50.0 c

100

0

0

0

_

0

Nieky

23

7

0

11.7 a

100

0

0

0

_

0

Abidjan

26

21

0

22.3 a

100

0

0

0

_

0

Total

115

186

0

30.9

91.8

8

19

0

35.2

8.2

*: Percentage of each molecular form in the population tested

a,b Values sharing a superscript letter are not significantly different at the 5% level for G119S mutation distribution

The G119S mutation was detected in all the six populations tested, but only at heterozygote state, either in the M or in the S form. The highest mutation frequency was observed in the M form from the Tiassalé urban area located in semi-deciduous forest (50%) and the lowest in the M form from the Nieky banana cultivation fields in evergreen forest (12%). No significant difference was seen between G119S mutation frequencies in M and S forms from Toumbokro (p = 0.9153).

Discussion

The distribution of M and S molecular forms of An. gambiae s.s. in the study agrees with previous findings that reported both M and S forms in Guinea savannah areas and only the M form in the forest areas [2730]. This geographic distribution seems to follow more the global environment than the breeding sites nature. Both forms are involved in carbamate and organophosphate resistance, although at different level according to insecticides. Indeed, in this study, An. gambiae s.s. displayed large variations in resistance level to carbamates and organophosphates. Although the wild populations were all resistant to carbamates, resistance was less marked to propoxur than to carbosulfan at WHO diagnostic concentrations.

All these populations were as resistant to carbosulfan as the population of Yaokoffikro in surrounding area of Bouaké [11]. The resistance reported in Bouaké was attributed to agricultural or domestic hygiene or public health use of carbamates. In Burkina-Faso, Diabaté et al[31] attributed An. gambiae s.s. pyrethroid resistance in cotton field areas to their use in agriculture.

The observed cross-resistance to organophosphates and carbamates in Tiassalé and Toumodi highlights implication of their common target site: the AChE-1. Although the mutation ace-1 G119S provided cross-resistance to organophosphates and carbamates, the resistance level greatly varied between both insecticide families. This difference observed in resistance level could be the consequence of their difference observed in dominance level relied on insecticide specificity. According to Djogbénou et al[32], dominance status of ace-1 G119S varied between semirecessivity with fenitrothion and chlorpyrifos methyl to semidominance with propoxur and carbamates. The fact that low cross-resistance was observed in the other populations, suggests and confirms potential involvement of metabolic resistance mechanisms and/or alternative mutation associated to G119S. This may explain why mortality rates to organophosphates among samples from Nieky, Abidjan and Yamoussoukro were so strong despite confirmed resistance level to carbamates in bioassays.

Such result could also be explained by possible cross-resistance between organophosphates and pyrethroids based on an increased detoxification mechanism were as suggested for other anopheline species selected for pyrethroid resistance [33].

Moreover an alternative mutation in ace-1 gene was described in the Culex pipiens strain originating from Cyprus. This mutation is F290V substitution and it confers cross-resistance to OP and carbamate insecticides [34]. Because C. pipiens and An. gambiae s.s. share G119S, it is possible that they share also this other mutation. Asidi et al[13] had noted that G119S mutation did not confer effective resistance to chlorpyrifos-methyl. Yet, the G119S mutation involved certainly a high resistance to carbamate but could enhance organophosphate hydrolysis. Similar mutations in a homologous position to G119S are known to alter substrate specificity in Drosophila melanogaster and enhanced hydrolysis of some organophosphates [35].

The presence of G119S mutation in both M and S forms of An. gambiae s.s. has already been reported by Weill et al[16] and Djogbénou et al[17] and was suggested to result from introgression between forms. The wide distribution of ace-1 R reported here could result from an unique event that then spread as reported in C. pipiens amplified esterase B2 genes through the world [36].

The absence of homozygous resistant individuals might be related to high fitness cost of the G119S mutation, resulting on death of the homozygous resistant [13, 16, 17]. Indeed, greater mortality of resistant individuals during pupation relative to their sensitive counterparts was reported. There was also evidence for costs to adult fitness as resistant individuals were smaller than sensitive adults [37]. Consequently, in area where the resistant allele ace-1 R is present, resistant mosquitoes will mainly at heterozygote state (ace-1 RS ). Because of this fitness cost, at least one duplication combining resistant and susceptible alleles of the ace-1 locus has recently appeared, started to spread and replace ace-1 R in treated areas [17, 3841]. Duplications lead to an excess of heterozygotes in natural populations because that heterozygotes involving either ace-1 S or ace-1 R alleles do not exhibit deleterious side effects. To date, no specific test is available for detecting specifically ace-1 duplications as mosquitoes carrying duplications appear as heterozygous for ace-1 R mutation.

Further investigation is needed to tackle the origin of the difference of resistance between carbamates and organophosphates.

Conclusion

Data from this study complemented resistance to carbamates and organophosphates in An. gambiae s.s. populations from Côte d'Ivoire and the wide distribution of G119S mutation in both molecular forms. The low cross-resistance between carbamates and organophosphates through susceptibility tests in most of the populations suggests the involvement of other resistance mechanisms, probably a metabolic detoxification or an alternative mutation such as the F290V substitution. These results must be carefully considered while elaborating malaria control programs in Côte d'Ivoire.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the staff at the Institut Pierre Richet, Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire for their hard work during the field and laboratory process and for their continuing commitment despite extremely difficult conditions during the outbreak of civil war. Special thanks to Mahama Touré, Aboubacar Koné and JB Assamoi. We are also grateful to Nestor Konan for his technical assistance and Dr. Josiane Etang for her helpful comments on the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institut Pierre Richet (IPR)
(2)
Laboratoire de Zoologie et Biologie Animale, Université de Cocody
(3)
Centre d'Entomologie Médicale et Vétérinaire (CEMV), Université de Bouake
(4)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)/Laboratoire de Lutte Contre les Insectes Nuisibles (LIN) LIN

References

  1. Guillet P, Chandre F, Mouchet J: L'utilisation des insecticides en santé publique: état et perspectives. Med Mal Infect. 1997, 27: 552-557. 10.1016/S0399-077X(97)80117-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Elissa N, Mouchet J, Riviere F, Meunier JY, Yao K: Resistance of Anopheles gambiae s.s. to pyrethroids in Côte-d'Ivoire. Ann Soc Belge Med Trop. 1993, 73: 291-294.Google Scholar
  3. Chandre F, Darriet F, Manga L, Akogbeto M, Faye O, Mouchet J, Guillet P: Status of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. Bull World Health Organ. 1999, 77: 230-234.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandre F, Darriet F, Manguin S, Brengues C, Carnevale P, Guillet P: Pyrethroid cross resistance spectrum among population of Anopheles gambiae s.s. from Côte d'Ivoire. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999, 15: 53-59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule JM, Wang X, Hemingway J, Collins FH: Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae s.s. associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Ins Mol Biol. 2000, 9: 491-497. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00209.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Darriet F, N'Guessan R, Koffi AA, Konan LY, Doannio JMC, Chandre F, Carnevale P: Impact de la résistance de Anopheles gambiae s.s. aux pyréthrinoïdes sur l'efficacité des moustiquaires imprégnées dans la prévention du paludisme: résultats des essais en cases expérimentales avec la deltaméthrine. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2000, 93: 131-134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. N'Guessan R, Darriet F, Doannio JMC, Chandre F, Carnevale P: Olyset Net® efficacy against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Culex quinquefasciatus after 3 years' field use in Cote d'Ivoire. Med Vet Entomol. 2001, 15: 97-104. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2001.00284.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hougard JM, Corbel V, N'Guessan R, Darriet F, Chandre F, Akogbeto M, Baldet T, Guillet P, Carnevale P, Traoré-Lamizana M: Efficacy of mosquito nets treated with insecticide mixtures or mosaics against insecticide resistant Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Cote d'Ivoire. Bull Entomol Res. 2003, 93: 491-498. 10.1079/BER2003261.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Henry Mc, Assi Sb, Rogier C, Dossou-Yovo J, Chandre F, Guillet P, Carnevale P: Protective efficacy of lambda-cyhalothrin treated nets in Anopheles gambiae pyrethroid resistance areas of Cote d'Ivoire. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 73: 859-864.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guillet P, N'Guessan R, Darriet F, Traore-Lamizana M, Chandre F, Carnevale P: First trials of combined pyrethroid and carbamate treated mosquito nets active against pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Culex quinquefasciatus. Med Vet Entomol. 2001, 15: 105-112. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2001.00288.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. N'guessan R, Darriet F, Guillet P, Carnevale P, Traore-Lamizana M, Corbel V, Koffi AA, Chandre F: Resistance to carbosulfan in Anopheles gambiae s.s. from Ivory Coast based on reduced sensitivity of acetylcholinesterase. Med Vet Entomol. 2003, 17: 1-7. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2003.00406.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Asidi AN, N'Guessan R, Hutchinson RA, Traore-Lamizana M, Carnevale P, Curtis CF: Experimental hut comparisons of nets treated with carbamate or pyrethroid insecticides, washed or unwashed, against pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol. 2004, 18: 134-140. 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00485.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Asidi AN, N'Guessan R, Koffi AA, Curtis CF, Hougard JM, Chandre F, Darriet F, Zaim M, Rowland MW: Experimental hut evaluation of bednets treated with an organophosphate (chlorpyrifos-methyl) or a pyrethroid (lambdacyalothrin) alone and in combination against insecticide-resistant Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. Malar J. 2005, 4: 25-10.1186/1475-2875-4-25.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Weill M, Lutfalla G, Mogensen K, Chandre F, Berthomieu A, Berticat C, Pasteur N, Philips A, Fort P, Raymond M: Insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors. Nature. 2003, 423: 136-137. 10.1038/423136b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bourguet D, Capela R, Raymond M: An insensitive acetylcholinesterase in Culex pipiens L. mosquitoes from Portugal. J Econ Entomol. 1996, 89: 1060-1066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Weill M, Malcolm C, Chandre F, Mogensen K, Berthomieu A, Marquine M, Raymond M: The unique mutation in Ace-1 giving high insecticide resistance is easily detectable in mosquito vectors. Insect Mol Biol. 2004, 13: 1-7. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2004.00452.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Djogbénou L, Chandre F, Berthomieu A, Dabiré R, Koffi A, Alout H, Weill M: Evidence of introgression of the ace-1R mutation and of the ace-1 duplication in West African Anopheles gambiae s.s. Plos ONE. 2008, 3 (5): e2172-10.1371/journal.pone.0002172.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. WHO: Tests procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vectors, bio-efficacy and persistence of insecticides on treated surfaces. 1998, 12-WHO/CDS/CPC/MAL/Google Scholar
  19. Doucet J, Adam JP, Binson G: Les Culicidae de la Côte d'Ivoire. Ann Parasitol Hum Comparée. 1960, 25: 390-408.Google Scholar
  20. Koffi AA, Chandre F, Tia E, Darriet F, Touré M, Dossou-Yovo J, N'guessan R, Konan YL, Doannio JMC, Carnevale P: Pyrethroid resistance in populations of An. gambiae s.l. from Côte d'Ivoire. Insecticide Resistance in Malaria Vectors, Multilateral Initiative on Malaria. 2001, Harare, ZimbabweGoogle Scholar
  21. Koffi AA: Résistance d'Anopheles gambiae (Gilles, 1902) aux pyréthrinoïdes et son impact sur la lutte antivectorielle, par les moustiquaires imprégnées d'insecticides. Thèse de Doctorat. 2002, Université de Cocody, UFR Biosciences, Abidjan, Côte d'IvoireGoogle Scholar
  22. Collins FH, Finnerty V, Petrarca V: Ribosomal DNA probes differentiate five cryptic species in the Anopheles gambiae s.s. complex. Parasitology. 1988, 30: 231-240.Google Scholar
  23. Favia G, Lanfrancotti A, Spanos L, Siden-Kiamos I, Louis C: Molecular characterization of ribosomal DNA polymorphisms discriminating among chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 2001, 10: 19-23. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00236.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Raymond M, Rousset F: Genepop (version 1.2), population genetics software for exact tests and eucumenicism. J Heredity. 1995, 86: 248-249.Google Scholar
  25. Goudet J, Raymond M, De Meeüs T, Rousset F: Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics. 1996, 144: 1933-1940.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Scott J, Brogdon W, Collins F: Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by PCR. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 49: 520-529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. della Torre A, Fanello C, Akogbeto M, Dossou-Yovo J, Favia G, Petrarca V, Coluzzi M: Molecular evidence of incipient speciation within Anopheles gambiae s.s. in West Africa. Insect Mol Biol. 2001, 10: 9-18. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00235.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. della Torre A, Tu Z, Petrarca V: On the distribution and genetic differentiation of Anopheles gambiae s.s. molecular forms. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005, 35: 755-769. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fanello C, Petrarca V, della Torre A, Santolamazza F, Dolo G, Coulibaly M, Alloueche A, Curtis CF, Toure YT, Coluzzi M: The pyrethroid knock-down resistance gene in the Anopheles gambiae complex in Mali and further indication of incipient speciation within An. gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 2003, 12: 241-245. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2003.00407.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Onyabe DY, Vajime CG, Nock IH, Ndams IS, Akpa AU, Alaribe AA, Conn JE: The distribution of M and S molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 97: 605-608. 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)80045-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Diabaté A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Akogbeto M, Guiguemde TR, Darriet F, Brengues C, Guillet P, Hemingway J, Small GJ, Hougard JM: The role of agricultural use of insecticides in resistance to pyrethroids in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 67: 617-622.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Djogbénou L, Weill M, Hougard JM, Raymond M, Akogbéto M, Chandre F: Characterization of insensitive acetylcholinesterase (ace-1 R ) in Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae): Resistance levels and dominance. J Med Entomol. 2007, 44: 805-810. 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[805:COIAAI]2.0.CO;2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Brogdon WG, Barber AM: Fenitrothion-deltamethrin cross-resistance conferred by esterases in Guatemalan Anopheles albimanus. Pest Biochem Phys. 1987, 37: 130-139. 10.1016/0048-3575(90)90118-L.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Alout H, Berthomieu A, Hadjivassilis A, Weill M: A new amino-acid substitution in acetylcholinesterase 1 confers insecticide resistance to Culex pipiens mosquitoes from Cyprus. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007, 37: 41-47. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Newcomb RD, Campbell PM, Ollis DL, Cheah E, Russel RJ, Oakeshott JG: A single amino acid substitution converts a carboxylesterase to an organophosphorus hydrolase and confers insecticide resistance on blowfly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 7464-7468. 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7464.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Raymond M, Callaghan A, Fort P, Pasteur N: Worldwide migration of amplified insecticide resistance genes in mosquitoes. Nature. 1991, 350: 151-153. 10.1038/350151a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Djogbénou L, Noel V, Agnew P: Costs of insensitive acetylcholinesterase insecticide resistance for the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae homozygous for the G119S mutation. Malar J. 2010, 9: 12-10.1186/1475-2875-9-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lenormand T, Guillemaud T, Bourguet D, Raymond M: Appearance and sweep of a gene duplication: Adaptive response and potential for new functions in the mosquito Culex pipiens. Evolution. 1998, 52: 1705-1712. 10.2307/2411343.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Labbé P, Berthomieu A, Berticat C, Alout H, Raymond M, Lenormand , Weill M: Independent duplications of the acetylcholinesterase gene conferring insecticide resistance in the mosquito Culex pipiens. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1056-1067. 10.1093/molbev/msm025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Labbé P, Berticat C, Berthomieu A, Unal S, Bernard C, Weill M, Lenormand T: Forty years of erratic insecticide resistance evolution in the mosquito Culex pipiens. PLOS Genet. 2007, 3: 2190-2199. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Djogbénou L, Labbé P, Chandre F, Pasteur N, Weill M: Ace-1 duplication in Anopheles gambiae: a challenge for malaria control. Malar J. 2009, 8: 70-10.1186/1475-2875-8-70.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Alou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement