Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Declining incidence of imported malaria in the Netherlands, 2000-2007

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 1, 2, 3,
  • 1, 4,
  • 2, 3,
  • 2, 5,
  • 2, 6,
  • 2, 7,
  • 2, 8 and
  • 1, 2, 3
Malaria Journal20109:300

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-300

  • Received: 11 June 2010
  • Accepted: 28 October 2010
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

To describe the epidemiology and trends of imported malaria in the Netherlands from 2000 through 2007.

Methods

Based on national surveillance data regarding all reported infections of imported malaria, diagnosed 2000 through 2007, incidence and trends of imported malaria in the Netherlands were estimated. Travellers statistics were used to estimate incidence, and data on malaria chemoprophylaxis prescriptions were used to estimate the number of unprotected travellers.

Results

Importation of malaria to the Netherlands is declining even as more travellers visit malaria-endemic countries. On average, 82% were acquired in sub-Saharan Africa, and 75% were caused by Plasmodium falciparum. The overall incidence in imported falciparum malaria fell from 21.5 to 6.6/10,000 of unprotected travellers. The percentage of unprotected travellers rose from 47% to 52% of all travellers. The incidence of imported falciparum infections is greatest from Middle and West Africa, and decreased from 121.3 to 36.5/10,000 travellers. The import of malaria from this region by immigrants visiting friends and relatives (VFR) decreased from 138 infections in 2000, to 69 infections in 2007.

Conclusion

The annual number of imported malaria shows a continuing declining trend, even with an increasing number of travellers visiting malaria endemic countries. VFR import less malaria than previously, and contribute largely to the declining incidence seen. The decline is not readily explained by increased use of chemoprophylaxis and may reflect a reduced risk of infection due to decreasing local malaria transmission as observed in some malaria endemic areas. Nevertheless, the increasing number of unprotected travellers remains worrisome.

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • Falciparum Infection
  • Proguanil
  • Malaria Chemoprophylaxis
  • Traveller Statistic

Background

Malaria is the world's most important parasitic disease and is endemic in more than 105 countries. About 3.3 billion people, or half of the world's population, are at risk of malaria. Every year there are about 250 million malaria cases and nearly one million deaths [1, 2], mostly in malaria-endemic regions. An infection acquired in an endemic region, but diagnosed in a non-endemic country, usually after development of clinical symptoms, is defined as imported malaria [1, 3, 4]. Such diagnoses may occur either in travellers who have recently toured or visited endemic regions or in travellers from endemic regions who are visiting a non-endemic country. Travellers from non-endemic regions are generally advised to use personal protective measures and malaria chemoprophylaxis when visiting malaria-endemic regions. Yet despite the availability of adequate chemoprophylactic drugs in the Netherlands and other non-endemic countries, imported malaria continues to cause considerable morbidity and mortality among returning travellers. Immigrants from endemic countries and returning to their country of origin to visit friends and relatives (VFR) are a particular risk group among these [5, 6]. From the 1970s onward, the annual importation of malaria to Europe showed a steady increase. In the late 1990s, these imported cases in Europe were estimated to number at least 10,000 to 13,000 per year, excluding many that are believed to be unreported [79].

The aim of this research is to present a comprehensive overview of trends in imported malaria in the Netherlands in the period from 2000 through 2007. In addition, the annual incidence of Plasmodium falciparum infections is estimated using travel statistics regarding the annual number of travellers to malaria-endemic regions, as well as data from Dutch pharmacies regarding annual prescriptions for malaria chemoprophylaxis.

Methods

Malaria infections

In the Netherlands, all laboratory-confirmed infections of malaria are reported to the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Since such reports became compulsory in 1932, the system of reporting has changed over the years. In order to minimize underreporting of malaria infections in the Netherlands, the reporting system was changed in 1999 from doctor-based to laboratory-based reporting. Underreporting before that time was estimated to be about 60% [10]. All infections reported between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2007 were analysed, using the following surveillance data: date of laboratory confirmation of the Plasmodium species (results of conventional microscopy with subsequent specification of the Plasmodium species), patient data (gender, date of birth, country of birth, and country of mother's birth), and travel information (most likely country of infection, reason for travel). Infected persons were classified as to ethnic origin based on the reported country of their birth and/or their mother's birth. They were classified into four categories based on their reason for travel; Western tourists visiting endemic countries; Dutch expatriates living in endemic countries (including military and airline personnel); visiting residents from endemic countries (including new immigrants, asylum seekers, refugees); and immigrants (or their descendants) from endemic countries to the Netherland who visit friends and relatives (VFR) in those countries. In this report, these categories will be referred to as, tourists, expatriates, visitors and VFR, respectively. In the period 2000-2003, data on some of these variables were missing. In 2003, a new digital reporting system was introduced, providing more complete information.

Traveller statistics

Only data on malaria-endemic countries, for which the Malaria Working Group of Dutch the National Coordination Centre for Travellers' Health Advice (LCR) advises travellers to take malaria chemoprophylaxis were used[11]. See additional file 1 for a list of all travel destinations included. When no country-specific travel data were available, regional data were used instead. Countries were grouped into continental regions and sub-regions according to the composition of macro-geographical regions described by the United Nations Statistics Division [12].

Malaria chemoprophylaxis prescriptions

Data on the number of annual prescriptions for malaria chemoprophylaxis (atovaquone/proguanil, mefloquine, and proguanil), collected from pharmacies in the Netherlands by the Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics (SFK) [13], were employed to estimate the annual number of travellers using the chemoprophylaxis. Chloroquine was not included because it is generally prescribed in combination with proguanil, and not as a single chemoprophylactic drug. Doxycycline was not included, because it is not recommended as a first drug of choice, and according to National Coordination Centre for Travellers' Health Advice (LCR), only sporadically prescribed as a malaria chemoprophylactic drug. It is mostly prescribed for other indications than malaria prophylaxis.

Data analysis

The incidence of imported P. falciparum malaria in the Netherlands was estimated using the annual number of reported P. falciparum infections as numerator and the number of travellers to malaria-endemic regions as denominator. Imported infections in visiting residents from malaria-endemic countries were excluded from this part of the analysis, as visiting residents from malaria-endemic countries are no part of the travellers statistics.

Incidence specific to a region or a sub-region was estimated using the number of reported P. falciparum infections from that region or sub-region as numerator and the annual number of travellers to that region or sub-region as denominator.

In addition, assuming that P. falciparum infection mainly occurs in travellers not using chemoprophylaxis, the incidence of imported P. falciparum malaria in unprotected travellers from the Netherlands was calculated. The annual number of unprotected travellers was estimated by deducting the number of annual prescriptions for malaria chemoprophylaxis from the total of travellers to malaria-endemic regions., A region-specific incidence for "unprotected" travellers only could not be calculated, because data on prescriptions from Dutch pharmacies do not include data on destination. Trends in infection probability (incidence) were modelled via Poisson regression. Trends in relative contribution of reason for travel were modelled via multinomial logistic regression. All time trends were fitted using restricted cubic splines, to allow for smoothly varying trends over time [14]. Analyses were performed in the R statistical package.

Results

Imported infections of malaria 2000-2007

From 2000 through 2007, a total of 2,847 persons were diagnosed with malaria in the Netherlands. The annual number of imported malaria infections fell from 535 in 2000 to 197 in 2007. Most infections (92% or 2,624) occurred in adults; 5% occurred in children aged 6-15 years, and 3% in children five years or younger. The median age of infection was 36 years, and 33% of patients were female. Table 1 shows the annual number of reported infections by Plasmodium species. As in 11% (322) of all confirmed infections the causative species was not specified, mainly in the years 2000 through 2003, estimates were calculated. In the column 'adjusted' of Table 1, the unknown Plasmodium species were proportionally distributed among the four species, based on their respective annual contribution. Most recorded infections (2,131 or 75%) were caused by P. falciparum. The remainder was caused by Plasmodium vivax (15%), Plasmodium ovale (7%), and Plasmodium malariae (3%). A very small proportion of all infections (20 or 0.7%) was attributable to mixtures of species, most of which involved P. falciparum. Despite a decrease in the absolute number of infected patients, the relative distribution of the causative species remains fairly stable over the time period studied (p = 0.58).
Table 1

Reported infections of malaria in the Netherlands. 2000-2007 In the column 'adjusted' unknown Plasmodium species were proportionally distributed among the four species based on their respective annual contribution.

Species

P. falciparum

P. ovale

P. vivax

P. malariae

Total

Not specified

Year

No.

No. corrected (%)

No.

No. corrected (%)

No.

No. corrected (%)

No.

No. corrected (%)

  

2000

295

413 (77,2%)

28

39 (7,3%)

52

73 (13,6%)

7

11 (1,8%)

535

(153)

2001

313

390 (71,3%)

34

42 (7,7%)

78

97 (17,8%)

14

17 (3,2%)

547

(108)

2002

269

294 (74,3%)

29

32 (8,0%)

53

58 (14,6%)

11

12 (3,0%)

396

(34)

2003

244

255 (75,1%)

24

25 (7,4%)

49

51 (15,1%)

8

8 (2,5%)

340

(15)

2004

199

201 (68,6%)

25

25 (8,6%)

60

61 (20,7%)

6

6 (2,1%)

293

(3)

2005

232

235 (78,9%)

22

22 (7,5%)

33

33 (11,2%)

7

7 (2,4%)

298

(4)

2006

186

189 (78,5%)

14

14 (5,9%)

30

31 (12,7%)

7

7 (3.0%)

241

(4)

2007

151

152 (77,0%)

8

8 (4,1%)

33

33 (16,8%)

4

4 (2,0%)

197

(1)

Total

1,889

2,130 (74,8%)

184

208 (7,3%)

388

437 (15,4%)

64

72 (2,5%)

2,847

(322)

Region of infection

In 88% (2,511) of the records, the most likely country of infection was supplied. Table 2 shows the continental region and sub-region where the infections were acquired, by Plasmodium species. Most infections were acquired in Africa, (2,068 or 82%), followed by Asia (298 or 12%) and Middle and South America (142 or 6%). From 2000 through 2007, the annual number of imported Plasmodium infections from Africa almost halved, from 310 to 159 infections per year. Infections from Middle and South America fell from 27 in 2000 to seven in 2007. Imported infections from Asia varied, ranging from 18 to 63 infections per year.
Table 2

Reported imported infections of malaria by continent and sub-region of infection, and by species, The Netherlands, 2000-2007.

Region

P. falciparum

P. ovale

P. vivax

P. malariae

Species unknown

Total

Africa

1,658 (94%)

157 (94%)

78 (22%)

47 (78%)

128 (80%)

2,068 (82%)

Middle & West Africa 1

1413

110

23

39

89

1674

East & Southern Africa 2

245

47

55

8

39

394

America

43 (2%)

2 (1%)

79 (23%)

7 (12%)

11 (7%)

142 (6%)

Middle America 3

4

0

17

0

5

24

South America 4

39

2

62

7

6

118

Asia

71 (4%)

9 (5%)

192 (55%)

5 (8%)

21 (13%)

298 (12%)

South Asia 5

20

0

57

3

9

89

South East Asia 6

51

9

135

2

12

209

Oceania

2 (0.1%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (2%)

0 (0.0%)

3 (0.1%)

Sub total

1,774 (100%)

169 (100%)

349 (100%)

60 (100%)

160 (100%)

2,511 (100%)

Region of infection unknown

115

15

39

4

162

336

Total

1,889

184

388

64

322

2,847

1Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d'Ivoire, Congo, the Democratic republic of Congo, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Equatorial Guinea, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau,, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, São Tomé and Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo.

2Botswana, Burundi, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Nauru, Namibia, Rwanda, South Africa, Somalia, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zimbabwe.

3Anguilla (U.K.), Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda (U.K.), Cayman Islands (U.K.), Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Martinique (France), Mexico, Montserrat (U.K.), Netherlands Antilles, Nicaragua, Panama, Puerto Rico (U.S.), Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, Turks and Caicos Islands (U.K.), Virgin Islands, British, Virgin Islands, U.S.

4Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Easter Island (Chile), Ecuador, Falkland Islands (U.K.), French Guiana (France), Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, South Sandwich Islands, Suriname, Uruguay, Venezuela.

5Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Iraq, Iran, Maldives, Nepal, Oman, Pakistan, Sri Lanka.

6Brunei, Burma (Myanmar), Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste (East Timor), Vietnam.

Infections acquired in Asia were for the greater part (64%) caused by P. vivax, whereas those acquired in Africa were for the greater part (80%) caused by P. falciparum. Almost all P. falciparum infections (1,658 or 94%) were acquired in Africa. Of these, 80% (1,337) were acquired in the West African sub-region, with most coming from Ghana (550) followed by Nigeria (280) and the Gambia (126). Importation of P. falciparum from West Africa decreased from 182 infections in 2000 to 124 infections in 2007. The decrease was seen for all countries in this sub-region except Nigeria, which showed an increase.

Reason for travel

Information regarding the reason of the travel was available for 82% (2,346) of cases.

Of these, 53% were adults and children who had emigrated from malaria-endemic countries, settled in the Netherlands, and were subsequently visiting friends and relatives. Infections in these VFR declined from 210 in 2000 to 77 in 2007. Among Western tourist travellers (666 or 28%), infections declined from 122 to 53 over the study period. In expatriates (309 or 13%), infections remained stable, ranging from 32 and 50 per year.

In 119 cases (5%), the diagnosis of malaria was made in visiting residents from malaria endemic countries, mostly from the African region. The number of infections diagnosed in visiting residents increased from three in 2000 to 24 in 2007. The relative contributions for all four categories of patients to the probability of an imported malaria infection were estimated. Figure 1 shows the fitted trends of the probability of infection for all four categories of patients with 95% confidence intervals. The probability of infection in VFR and Western tourists show a declining trend, whereas the probability of infection in expatriates and visiting residents from malaria endemic countries is increasing.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Fitted trends in probability of infection for the four categories of patients with imported malaria, the Netherlands, 2000-2007. The probability of infection is shown with 95% confidence intervals.

Ethnic origin

Information on the ethnic origin of the patients was available in 75% (2,141) of the records. Of these patients, almost half (1,042 or 49%) were persons of Middle and West African origin, mainly from Ghana (452) and Nigeria (221), of which 98% and 95% acquired the infection in the country of origin, respectively. Of these, 11% (115/1,042) were aged 16 years or younger. The number of infections in persons of Middle and West African origin declined from 150 in 2000 to 80 in 2007, and in persons of East and Southern African origin from 22 in 2000 to 10 in 2007. Approximately a third (769 or 36%) of the infections were in persons of Dutch ethnic origin, of which 5% were in children aged 16 years or younger. The countries in which Dutch persons most frequently acquired infection were Ghana (102), Indonesia (78), or the Gambia (72). The number of infections in persons of Dutch ethnic origin fluctuated between 68 and 129. Few infections occurred in persons of South or South East Asian origin (83 or 4%; mainly from Afghanistan (14), India (18), and Indonesia (19)), and in persons of Middle or South American origin (58 or 3%; mainly Surinam (42)). Infections in all these groups decreased.

Number of travellers and the use of malaria chemoprophylaxis

The number of travellers visiting the malaria-endemic regions for which the LCR recommends malaria chemoprophylaxis increased from 247,000 in 2000 to 384,000 in 2007 [12]. The number of travellers to the Middle and West African sub-region almost doubled over time from 16,000 to 31,000, but the proportion of travel to this region is rather small (range 3-13%) compared to other the regions.

In the same period, the number of prescriptions for malaria chemoprophylaxis issued by Dutch pharmacies rose steadily by 42%, from 131,400 in 2000 to 186,300 in 2007. In 2000, the combination drug atovaquone/proguanil was registered for the use of malaria chemoprophylaxis, whereupon it gradually replaced the number of prescriptions for mefloquine and proguanil. In 2007, 76% of all prescriptions were atovaquone/proguanil. Figure 2 shows the proportional change in the use of malaria chemoprophylaxis and the absolute growth of the number of travellers to malaria-endemic countries. Despite the increased number of prescriptions for malaria chemoprophylaxis, the proportion of protected travellers decreased from 53% (115,600) of all travellers in 2000 to 48% (197,700) of all travellers in 2007.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Number of collected prescriptions for malaria chemoprophylaxis (shown in bars), and total number of travellers to malaria-endemic regions (shown in line), the Netherlands, 2000-2007.

Trends in incidence of imported Plasmodium falciparum malaria

Figure 3 shows the estimated annual incidence of P. falciparum malaria imported in unprotected travellers and in all travellers from the Netherlands, combined with the number of travellers. The estimated incidence was highest in 2002 (27.5/10,000 unprotected travellers) but dropped from 21.5 in 2000 to 6.6 infections per 10,000 unprotected travellers in 2007 (p < 0.001). The incidence in all travellers (i.e., protected and unprotected) declined from 10.0 to 3.4 infections per 10,000 travellers (p < 0.001). This drop is for the most part caused by the decreased importation from Africa, in particular from Middle and West Africa (from 121.3/10,000 travellers in 2000 to 36.5/10,000 travellers in 2007, p < 0.001). Figures 4, 5 and 6 show the incidence changes per region and sub-region. Except for Asia (p = 0.15) and Middle America (p = 0.5), all areas showed significant declining trends (p < 0.001, except South East Asia, p = 0.03), however the number of infections were small for these regions.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Overall incidence of imported Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Netherlands, 2000-2007, and number of travellers to malaria endemic regions.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Region-specific of imported Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Netherlands, 2000-2007, and number of travellers to malaria endemic regions - Africa.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Region-specific of imported Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Netherlands, 2000-2007, and number of travellers to malaria endemic regions - Central and South America.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Region-specific of imported Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Netherlands, 2000-2007, and number of travellers to malaria endemic regions - Asia.

Discussion

The results of this study show a steep and declining trend in malaria infections since 2000. This is in striking contrast to the steady increase in imported cases that began in the 1970s [15]. Despite increasing travel to malaria-endemic countries, the estimated incidence of imported P. falciparum infections per 10,000 travellers declined from 10.0 in 2000 to 3.4 in 2007. This decrease is not readily explained by an increased uptake of malaria chemoprophylaxis, because the observed increase of prescriptions for chemoprophylaxis did not match the growth in travel. Moreover, despite the additional number of travellers at risk, the estimated incidence of imported P. falciparum fell from 21.5 to 6.6 infections per 10,000 unprotected travellers.

In this study, incidence estimates were calculated assuming that P. falciparum infection occurs only in travellers not using malaria chemoprophylaxis. Other studies confirm this [1619], and several surveys show that up to 60% of travellers are not protected against malaria [20, 21]. Of course it is likely that some of the imported infections in the Netherlands were caused by incorrect use of malaria chemoprophylaxis, rather than non-use. Improved drug compliance over time may have contributed to the observed decrease of imported malaria. It is likely that the increased use of atovaquone/proguanil, since 2000, has enhanced compliance with chemoprophylaxis [22, 23], and in this way contributed to the decreased importation of malaria. Yet, some studies found no difference in compliance among the various prophylactic regimens [2426]. Furthermore, how patients comply depends on many more variables than the chemoprophylactic drug itself, such as personal characteristics, perception of risk, and travel destination [2729]. The risk of infection in travellers not using malaria chemoprophylaxis depends on other factors too. For example, the use of personal protective measures, such as impregnated bed nets and mosquito repellents, reduces the risk of infection considerably. Lastly, the risk of infection depends on the malaria endemicity, which varies per country, within a country or region, but also may depend on the season of travel. In some travel destination personal protective measures offer sufficient protection against infection. In conclusion, this may have led to an underestimation of the true incidence, but still allowed us to analyse the declining trends.

The drop in incidence of imported P. falciparum infections is greatest in travellers returning from Middle and West Africa, even though travel to this sub-region has doubled. Other studies likewise describe a declining incidence of malaria imported from West Africa [4, 18, 30]. Most malaria infections in the Netherlands are acquired in that region, and occurred in immigrants, mainly VFR from Ghana and Nigeria. The importation of malaria by VFR from this region decreased from 138 infections in 2000 to 69 infections in 2007, making a large contribution to the observed decline in incidence. Also among tourist travellers, the number of infections from this region (mainly from Ghana and the Gambia) decreased from 65 infections in 2000 to 25 infections in 2007.

An explanation may be a decreased risk of infection in their destination country [30]. Indeed, in some African countries a reduction in local malaria transmission is reported, especially in urban areas [31]. Some countries have achieved a high coverage of measures to control malaria, including extended use of bed nets treated with insecticide and improved access to malaria treatment, resulting in a large fall in the number of malaria cases and deaths between 2000 and 2007 [2, 32]. At the same time in some other countries like Ghana and Nigeria, there was no evidence of a true reduction in malaria infections, and most parts of Africa are still considered areas of high endemicity [2, 33]. Yet VFR may have improved their accommodations when visiting, e.g. by investing in better local housing, often in cities and urban areas, and having better access to protective measures like indoor spraying and insecticide-treated bed nets. In 2001, the public health service of Amsterdam studied factors determining the use of pre-travel preventive services by VFR traveling to West Africa from the Netherlands. The researchers concluded that some West Africans (in particular, non-Ghanaians, illegal immigrants, and immigrants leaving at short notice) were not consulting pre-travel preventive health services [34]. An explanation for the observed decrease in malaria imported by Ghanaian VFR may be that their uptake of malaria chemoprophylaxis has improved even more than in other groups.

A limitation of this study may be that the travellers statistics, based on the Continuous Holiday Survey, did not include non-Dutch and illegal immigrants. In the Netherlands, a large proportion (50%) of the resident West Africans have no legal status, although this percentage is less among people from Ghana than those from Nigeria [34]. (Illegal) immigrants were classified in the VFR category, but were not represented in the denominator. Any resulting overestimation of the incidence of malaria in West African travellers would be small, as illegal immigrants lack official documents permitting regular travel.

Another limitation of this study is that for some continental regions, country-specific travellers statistics were unavailable. In estimating the incidence specific to regions and sub-regions, only travellers statistics of countries for which the Malaria Working Group of the Dutch LCR advises malaria chemoprophylaxis were used. This produced however some denominator problems. For South America data for the whole sub-region were used as travel data to malaria-endemic and non-endemic countries could not be separated,. As mentioned previously this may have led to an underestimation of the true incidence of infection from the individual malaria-endemic countries.

Conclusion

The declining incidence of imported malaria is not easily explained and likely to be multi-factorial. The decline is positive, but the increasing number of travellers from the Netherlands using no malaria chemoprophylaxis remains a concern. Despite the current optimism about decreasing malaria transmission in several parts of the world, vigilance is needed for the growing lack of awareness among travellers and, therefore, the growing need for prophylactic measures. In 2008, a cluster of 56 European tourist travellers returned from Gambia with P. falciparum, of which three died. All patients did not use, or wrongly used chemoprophylaxis [35]. For some malarious destinations, such as the Indian subcontinent and Middle and South America, less strict guidelines on malaria prophylaxis seem plausible [36, 37]. However, an improved effort is needed to increase awareness and protection among the growing number of travellers to Africa and other areas endemic for P. falciparum.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the public health nurses and physicians of all Public Health Services in the Netherlands for their data collection on malaria, and Lucy Philips for editing the final manuscript

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Public Health Service Amsterdam, Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(2)
Malaria Working Group of National Coordination Centre for Travellers' Health Advice (LCR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(3)
Academic Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Tropical Medicine and AIDS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(4)
Academic Medical Center, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(5)
Tropvacc BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
(6)
Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Infectious Disease, Section Travel Medicine, The Netherlands
(7)
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nijmegen, Netherlands
(8)
Department of Internal Medicine, Harbour Hospital and Institute for Tropical Diseases, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

References

  1. Kain KC, Keystone JS: Malaria in travelers. Epidemiology, disease, and prevention. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1998, 12: 267-284. 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70005-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. World Malaria Report. 2008, [http://www.who.int/malaria/publications]
  3. Ladhani S, Aibara RJ, Riordan FA, Shingadia D: Imported malaria in children: a review of clinical studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 349-357. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70110-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Smith AD, Bradley DJ, Smith V, Blaze M, Behrens RH, Chiodini PL, Whitty CJ: Imported malaria and high risk groups: observational study using UK surveillance data 1987-2006. BMJ. 2008, 337: a120-10.1136/bmj.a120.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Leder K, Tong S, Weld L, Kain KC, Wilder-Smith A, von SF, Black J, Brown GV, Torresi J: Illness in travelers visiting friends and relatives: a review of the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network. Clin Infect Dis. 2006, 43: 1185-1193. 10.1086/507893.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Schlagenhauf P, Steffen R, Loutan L: Migrants as a major risk group for imported malaria in European countries. J Travel Med. 2003, 10: 106-107. 10.2310/7060.2003.31764.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Muentener P, Schlagenhauf P, Steffen R: Imported malaria (1985-95): trends and perspectives. Bull World Health Organ. 1999, 77: 560-566.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sabatinelli G, Ejov M, Joergensen P: Malaria in the WHO European Region (1971-1999). Euro Surveill. 2001, 6: 61-65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Toovey S, Jamieson A: Rolling back malaria: how well is Europe doing?. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2003, 1: 167-175. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2003.09.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. van Hest NA, Smit F, Verhave JP: Underreporting of malaria incidence in The Netherlands: results from a capture-recapture study. Epidemiol Infect. 2002, 129: 371-377. 10.1017/S0950268802007306.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Malaria Working Group of the National Coordination Centre for Travelers' Health Advice (LCR): Malariaprofylaxe Bulletin. 2009Google Scholar
  12. United Nations Statistics Division. Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings. [http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm]
  13. Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics (SFK).Malaria chemoprophylaxis prescriptions 2000-2007. [http://www.sfk.nl/data_warehouse]
  14. Durrleman S, Simon R: Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med. 1989, 8: 551-561. 10.1002/sim.4780080504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wetsteyn JC, de Geus GA: Falciparum malaria, imported into The Netherlands, 1979-1988. I. Epidemiological aspects. Trop Geogr Med. 1995, 47: 53-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sonder GJB, Van der Plas SM: Malaria Notifications in 2005; Evaluation of LCR-guidelines for malaria prophylaxis. Infectieziekten Bulletin. 2006, 07: 249-252.Google Scholar
  17. Mali S, Steele S, Slutsker L, Arguin PM: Malaria surveillance--United States, 2007. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009, 58: 1-16.Google Scholar
  18. van der Eerden LJM, Bosman A, Visser LG: Malaria reported in the Netherlands in 2002; less malaria. Infectieziekten Bulletin. 2003, 12: 419-423.Google Scholar
  19. Williams CJ, Jones J, Chiodini P: High case-fatality from falciparum malaria in UK travellers returning from The Gambia: a case series. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2007, 5: 295-300. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2007.05.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamer DH, Connor BA: Travel health knowledge, attitudes and practices among United States travelers. J Travel Med. 2004, 11: 23-26. 10.2310/7060.2004.13577.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. van Herck K, van Damme P, Castelli F, Zuckerman J, Nothdurft H, Dahlgren AL, Gisler S, Steffen R, Gargalianos P, Lopez-Velez R, Overbosch D, Caumes E, Walker E: Knowledge, attitudes and practices in travel-related infectious diseases: the European airport survey. J Travel Med. 2004, 11: 3-8. 10.2310/7060.2004.13609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Baas MC, Wetsteyn JC, van GT: Patterns of imported malaria at the academic medical center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. J Travel Med. 2006, 13: 2-7. 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2006.00003.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zuckerman JN, Batty AJ, Jones ME: Effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis against Plasmodium falciparum infection in UK travellers: retrospective observational data. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2009, 7: 329-36. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2009.10.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Camus D, Djossou F, Schilthuis HJ, Hogh B, Dutoit E, Malvy D, Roskell NS, Hedgley C, De Boever EH, Miller GB: Atovaquone-proguanil versus chloroquine-proguanil for malaria prophylaxis in nonimmune pediatric travelers: results of an international, randomized, open-label study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 38: 1716-1723. 10.1086/421086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hogh B, Clarke PD, Camus D, Nothdurft HD, Overbosch D, Gunther M, Joubert I, Kain KC, Shaw D, Roskell NS, Chulay JD: Atovaquone-proguanil versus chloroquine-proguanil for malaria prophylaxis in non-immune travellers: a randomised, double-blind study. Malarone International Study Team. Lancet. 2000, 356: 1888-1894. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03260-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Overbosch D, Schilthuis H, Bienzle U, Behrens RH, Kain KC, Clarke PD, Toovey S, Knobloch J, Nothdurft HD, Shaw D, Roskell NS, Chulay JD: Atovaquone-proguanil versus mefloquine for malaria prophylaxis in nonimmune travelers: results from a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 33: 1015-1021. 10.1086/322694.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Abraham C, Clift S, Grabowski P: Cognitive predictors of adherence to malaria prophylaxis regimens on return from a malarious region: a prospective study. Soc Sci Med. 1999, 48: 1641-1654. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00455-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Laverone E, Boccalini S, Bechini A, Belli S, Santini MG, Baretti S, Circelli G, Taras F, Banchi S, Bonanni P: Travelers' compliance to prophylactic measures and behavior during stay abroad: results of a retrospective study of subjects returning to a travel medicine center in Italy. J Travel Med. 2006, 13: 338-344. 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2006.00068.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Valve K, Ruotsalainen E, Kärki T, Pekkanen E, Siikamaki H: Cluster of imported malaria from Gambia in Finland--travellers do not listen to given advice. Euro Surveill. 2008, 13 (51): pii: 19068-Google Scholar
  30. Behrens RH, Carroll B, Smith V, Alexander N: Declining incidence of malaria imported into the UK from West Africa. Malar J. 2008, 7: 235-10.1186/1475-2875-7-235.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Robert V, Macintyre K, Keating J, Trape JF, Duchemin JB, Warren M, Beier JC: Malaria transmission in urban sub-Saharan Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 169-176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ceesay SJ, Casals-Pascual C, Erskine J, Anya SE, Duah NO, Fulford AJ, Sesay SS, Abubakar I, Dunyo S, Sey O, Palmer A, Fofana M, Corrah T, Bojang KA, Whittle HC, Greenwood BM, Conway DJ: Changes in malaria indices between 1999 and 2007 in The Gambia: a retrospective analysis. Lancet. 2008, 372: 1545-1554. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61654-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hay SI, Guerra CA, Gething PW, Patil AP, Tatem AJ, Noor AM, Kabaria CW, Manh BH, Elyazar IR, Brooker S, Smith DL, Moyeed RA, Snow RW: A world malaria map: Plasmodium falciparum endemicity in 2007. PLoS Med. 2009, 6: e1000048-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schilthuis HJ, Goossens I, Ligthelm RJ, de Vlas SJ, Varkevisser C, Richardus JH: Factors determining use of pre-travel preventive health services by West African immigrants in The Netherlands. Trop Med Int Health. 2007, 12: 990-998. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01856.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jelinek T, Schade LC, Siikamaki H, Myrvang B, Chiodini P, Gascon J, Visser L, Kapaun A, Just-Nubling G: European cluster of imported falciparum malaria from Gambia. Euro Surveill. 2008, 13: 1907-Google Scholar
  36. Behrens RH, Carroll B, Beran J, Bouchaud O, Hellgren U, Hatz C, Jelinek T, Legros F, Muhlberger N, Myrvang B, Siikamaki H, Visser L: The low and declining risk of malaria in travellers to Latin America: is there still an indication for chemoprophylaxis?. Malar J. 2007, 6 (114): 114-10.1186/1475-2875-6-114.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Behrens RH, Bisoffi Z, Bjorkman A, Gascon J, Hatz C, Jelinek T, Legros F, Muhlberger N, Voltersvik P: Malaria prophylaxis policy for travellers from Europe to the Indian Subcontinent. Malar J. 2006, 5: 7-10.1186/1475-2875-5-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© van Rijckevorsel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement