Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access

Congenital Plasmodium vivax malaria mimicking neonatal sepsis: a case report

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 1
Malaria Journal20109:63

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-63

  • Received: 12 December 2009
  • Accepted: 1 March 2010
  • Published:

Abstract

Although malaria in pregnancy can cause very significant neonatal morbidity, congenital malaria is a very rare condition in both endemic and non-endemic areas. A case of congenital malaria by Plasmodium vivax, initially mistaken for neonatal sepsis, is described. The correct diagnosis was accidentally done, as congenital malaria had been missed in the initial differential diagnosis.

Vivax malaria is the leading species in congenital infections in Europe. This condition should be included in the differential diagnosis of neonatal sepsis even if the mother has no proven malarial episodes during the gestational period.

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • Vivax Malaria
  • Neonatal Sepsis
  • Primaquine
  • Plasmodium Malariae

Background

Both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infections can cause adverse pregnancy outcomes, including maternal anaemia, low birth-weight due to preterm delivery and foetal growth restriction [1]. Pregnant women are more susceptible than non-pregnant women to malaria, especially in first and second pregnancy [2]. On the contrary, congenital malaria remains extremely rare both in endemic and non-endemic areas [3]. In endemic countries congenital malaria is mainly caused by P. falciparum [4]. In European countries most cases are due to Plasmodium malariae and P. vivax [5], associated with the decrease over time of malaria immunity, and the immunosuppression observed at the end of pregnancy [5].

A case of congenital malaria by P. vivax is presented and its differential diagnosis with other forms of neonatal sepsis are discussed.

Case presentation

A 22-day-old female infant delivered from a Pakistani mother was referred to the Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Spedali Civili, Brescia, for intermittent fever of one week duration with picks above 39 C°. The mother had a spontaneous, eutocic delivery at 40 week gestation with no abnormal events during the pregnancy period. The newborn birth weight was 2750 gr. She had mixte feeding and, up to three days before admission, she had been in good health.

On admission, the infant was in bad general conditions. Physical examination revealed paleness, whining cry, liver and spleen enlargement. Breathing and cardiac functions were normal. Laboratory evaluation showed mild anaemia (haemoglobin Hb: 12.3 g/dl), normal red and white blood cell counts (RBC 3.620.000/mmc, WBC 4.960/mmc) and severe thrombocytopaenia with platelets (PLT) 14.000/cmm. Other relevant results included mild hyper-bilirubinaemia: 4.14 mg/dl, hyper-transaminasaemia: aspartate aminotransferase 494 U/l and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) at 73.2 mg/dl (n.v. <5 mg/dl). The remaining biochemistry parameters and metabolic values were within normal limits. Blood and urine cultures were negative. A clinical diagnosis of neonatal sepsis was done and antibiotic treatment consisting of intravenous ampicillin and gentamicin was started.

Twenty-four hour after admission, by accidental examination of the peripheral blood to determine the differential white blood cell count, haemoparasites were noted within red blood cells. A thick and thin blood film revealed P. vivax trophozoites and few schizonts, with a parasitaemia of 2%. The diagnosis of vivax malaria was eventually confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

The infant was administered oral chloroquine 10 mg/kg the first and the second day followed by 5 mg/kg the third day. Four days after treatment peripheral parasitaemia was completely cleared, the white blood cell count increased up to 13.180/mmc, and the CRP fell down to 10.5 mg/dl.

The infant was discharged on day five with normal red and white blood cell counts, haemoglobin value, platelets count, biochemical profile, and normal inflammatory index (CRP < 5 mg/dl). No recrudescence was seen after six months of follow up.

The history of the mother was re-evaluated. She was a primigravida. She reported one clinical malaria attack in August 2008 (before becoming pregnant) during a short stay in Pakistan to visit relatives and friends. She reportedly received treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine. In May 2009, when she was at 32 week gestation she had been admitted to hospital in Italy for fever, anaemia (Hb 11.3 mg/dl,) and thrombocytopaenia (PLT 97.000/mmc). She received a diagnosis of urinary tract infection, was treated with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and she was discharged after four days of hospital stay.

The mother was re-evaluated at the light of the newborn diagnosis. She had no clinical symptoms of malaria and her blood smear thick film was negative for malaria parasites. No antimalarial drugs for either the haematic or liver stages were administered.

Discussion

This case shows that the diagnosis of congenital malaria should be considered as an important differential diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in infants who are born from mothers coming from malaria endemic countries with or without a history of malarial disease during pregnancy. The epidemiological concept of malaria exposure is of obvious paramount importance in this context. However, a proven history of malaria episodes of the mother during the gestational period is not essential: the episode may be mild enough not to require medical attention, or, as it most likely occurred in the case described, may go undiagnosed during a careless diagnostic procedure.

Postulated mechanisms for congenital transmission of malaria parasites include maternal transfusion into the foetal circulation either at the time of delivery or during pregnancy, direct penetration through the chorionic villi, or penetration through premature separation of placenta [6]. The remarkable capacity of the foetus to resist infection has been demonstrated [7]. This resistance can reflect the physical barrier of the placenta to infected red cells, the passive transfer of maternal antibodies, and the unfavourable environment offered by foetal erythrocytes for plasmodial replication due to their foetal haemoglobin composition and low free-oxygen tension [6, 8].

Congenital malaria can occur despite the absence of any evidence of active malaria infection of the mother during pregnancy. It can be speculated that the mother had a recrudescence episode of vivax malaria during the third trimester, which was mild, resolved spontaneously, and remained undiagnosed. Consistently with the case reported here, P. vivax malaria is reported to be more common in primigravidae than in multigravidae and is usually associated with mild maternal anaemia and increased risk of low birthweight [1]. Moreover, vivax malaria is not associated with miscarriage, stillbirth or with a shorten duration of pregnancy [1]. In this case, the mother presented mild anaemia (Hb 11.3 mg/dl) and the infant was delivered spontaneously at term with a normal birth weight. The time of onset of clinical symptoms in congenital malaria can vary from immediately after birth to ten weeks, but several studies underline that the median age of manifestation is 21 days [3, 9].

Diagnosis is simple with microscopic examination of blood films, though a clinical suspicion of the disease is required to start an appropriate diagnostic procedure. This report underlines that diagnosis can be achieved by accidental observation of parasites in a blood film, even when the diagnosis had not been previously suspected.

The clinical features of neonatal malaria include anaemia (77%), fever (74%), liver and spleen enlargement (68%), poor feeding/lethargy/irritability and jaundice [1012]. Severe thrombocytopaenia without bleeding, is also a frequently reported feature of congenital malaria [5, 9, 13].

The treatment of congenital vivax malaria requires a blood schizonticide, like chloroquine, whereas primaquine is unnecessary as in congenital malaria there is no hepatic stage of the parasite.

The higher prevalence of congenital malaria due to P. vivax than to P. falciparum in non-endemic countries is well established [1, 5]. The most likely explanation is represented by the longer incubation time and the relatively milder clinical presentation in P. vivax malaria, which allows for more maternal episodes to go undiagnosed and untreated. A potential additional determinant is represented by the contraindication during pregnancy of drugs that can eradicate the liver stage of the parasite, thus increasing the likelihood of late relapses.

In conclusions, P. vivax congenital malaria is a rare condition that should be included in the differential diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in newborns at epidemiological risk. More studies are needed to assess the mechanism of maternal transmission of P. vivax malaria, and its incidence in both endemic and non-endemic countries.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Brescia, Piazza Spedali Civili 1, 25125 Brescia, Italy
(2)
Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care,Spedali Clivili, Brescia, Italy
(3)
Laboratory of Chemical and Clinical Analysis, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy

References

  1. Nosten F, McGready R, Simpson JA, Thwai KL, Balkan S, Cho Thei, Hkirijaroen L, Looareesuwan S, White NJ: Effects of Plasmodium vivax malaria in pregnancy. Lancet. 1999, 354: 546-549. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09247-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rogerson SJ, Hvjjd L, Duffy PE, Leke RFG, Taylor D: Malaria in pregnancy: pathogenesis and immunity. Lancet. 2007, 7: 105-116. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70022-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sierez JY, De Pontual L, Poilane I, Ledeur F, Haouchine D, Hassine Lac: Congenital malaria as result of Plasmodium malariae in an infant born to a HIV-seropositive woman. Trop Med. 2005, 65: 477-81.Google Scholar
  4. Ibhanesebhor SE: Clinical characteristics of neonatal malaria. J Trop Pediatr. 2005, 65: 477-81.Google Scholar
  5. Voittier G, Arsac M, Farnoux C, Mariani-Kurdjian P, Baud O, Aujard Y: Congenital malaria in neonates: two case report and review of literature. Paediatrica. 2008, 97: 500-512. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00681.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. De Silva DHG, Mendis KN, Premaratne UN, Jayatilleke SMD, Soyza PE: Congenital malaria due to Plasmodium vivax: a case report from Sri Lanka. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1982, 75: 33-345. 10.1016/0035-9203(82)90011-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller IJ, Telford SR: Placental malaria. N Eng J Med. 1996, 335: 98-10.1056/NEJM199607113350205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wilson RJ, Pasvol G, Weatherall DJ: Invasion and growth of Plasmodium falciparum in different types of human erythrocyte. Bull World Health Organ. 1977, 55: 179-186.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lesko CR, Arguin PM, Newman RD: Congenital malaria in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007, 161: 1062-1067. 10.1001/archpedi.161.11.1062.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Krause PJ: Malaria (Plasmodium). Nelson Textbook of pediatrics. 2000, WB Saunders Company. Philadelphia, 974-978. 16Google Scholar
  11. Al Airishi HM, Al Hifizi IS, Ishag Y: Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in an extremely premature infant. Ann Saudi Med. 1999, 19: 245-247.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer PR: Malaria and newborns. J Trop Pediatrics. 2003, 49: 132-134. 10.1093/tropej/49.3.132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Baspinar O, Bayraktaroglu Z, Karsligil T, Bayram A, Coscun Y: A rare case of anemia and thrombocytopenia in a newborn: congenital malaria. Turk Journ Pediatr. 2006, 48: 63-658.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Del Punta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement