Open Access

Development of insecticide resistance in malaria vector Anopheles sinensis populations from Shandong province in China

  • Yuhua Dai1, 2,
  • Xiaodan Huang1,
  • Peng Cheng1,
  • Lijuan Liu1,
  • Haifang Wang1,
  • Huaiwei Wang1 and
  • Jingxuan Kou1Email author
Contributed equally
Malaria Journal201514:62

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0592-8

Received: 23 October 2014

Accepted: 29 January 2015

Published: 6 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Anopheles sinensis is a major vector of malaria and among the dominant species in Shandong province of China. Insecticide resistance is an important threat to vector-borne disease control. However, there are only few reports about insecticide resistance of An. sinensis populations from Shandong province.

Methods

From 2003 to 2012, six districts in Shandong province were selected as the study areas. Insecticide susceptibility bioassay were tested on F1 progeny of An. sinensis to 4% DDT, 0.05% deltamethrin, 0.15% cyfluthrin, and 5% malathion, using the standard WHO resistance tube assay.

Results

The resistance status of An. sinensis showed a significant decrease in the mortality rates in DDT, deltamethrin and cyfluthrin during the past ten years. Whereas obvious increase of mortality to malathion was observed throughout the assay, ranging from 47.37% to 86.62%.

Keywords

Insecticide resistance Anopheles sinensis Malaria Threat

Background

The mosquito Anopheles sinensis is a major vector of human malaria in southeast Asia [1-3], and among the dominant species in Shandong province of China [4,5]. In the early 1960s and 1970s, Shandong province used to be an endemic region of malaria, where two large-scale outbreaks had occurred with an annual infection of six million and four million, respectively. After implementation of malaria control strategy, the disease successfully came under control. The Chinese government, consequently, formulated a plan of action for the elimination of malaria and decided to achieve the ambitious goal of eliminating malaria across China by 2020. However, recent malaria monitoring revealed a trend of increase in the infection of malaria in some areas of Shandong province mainly due to the cross-border migration.

In order to combat malaria, vector control is still indispensable in endemic foci [6]. Hence, vector surveillance is essential to prevent recrudescence of malaria in low-transmission regions [7]. Insecticides remain the most important vector control method. However, resistance to multiple classes of insecticides is becoming a common problem for malaria vectors and a serious threat to vector-borne disease control. There have been a number of reports about insecticide resistance of An. sinensis in China [8-14]. There have only been few articles about Anopheles resistance to insecticides in Shandong province. In this study, the extent and the development of insecticide resistance in An. sinensis were examined against four common insecticides recommended by WHO for malaria vector control by indoor residual spraying (IRS).

In China, organochlorines, such as DDT, have been intensively administered for malaria control during the 1950s. These compounds have progressively been replaced by alternative, more specific and less toxic chemicals, such as pyrethroids. Nowadays, pyrethroids have been extensively used inside houses and impregnated-bed nets for malaria control, as authorized by WHO [15]. Since 1997, at the national level, 2.5 × 108 kg insecticides have been used as active ingredients, annually. The area treated with pyrethroids occupied more than forty percent of the total insecticide-treated area in China [9]. However, the uncontrolled use of chemical insecticides not only leads to the environmental pollution, but also the emergence of resistance in An. sinensis populations. Insecticide resistance is a source of great concern and needs to be monitored in order to maintain the efficacy of vector control operations in the field. The purpose of this study was to determine the trends in insecticide resistance in An. sinensis from Shandong province, thereby providing guidance for insecticide use for malaria risk reduction.

Methods

Study area

The study was conducted in malaria endemic sites in Eastern China from 2003 to 2012. Six separate districts (Figure 1) of Shandong Province (114-112°E, 34-38°N) were involved. Each district survey is composed of cities, counties, and a number of villages. In the selected district, the sites were chosen to encompass a range of insecticide selection pressures including a highly urbanized area where inhabitants use insecticides against arthropod nuisance, a rural site with high coverage of pesticide application and a site with less insecticide usage.
Figure 1

The location of the mosquito collection from Shandong province in China. The bars in the right map indicate 6 districts respectively.

Mosquito sample collection

Each year, surveys were conducted during the summer and fall months when mosquitoes were most abundant and diverse. Adult mosquitoes were collected by different collection methods including indoor and outdoor human landing collection, collection on cattle and morning resting collections inside houses. Anopheles sinensis was not the dangered and protected species, so no specific permissions were required for these locations/activities. Anopheles sinensis adult mosquitoes were given fresh 8% sucrose solution daily. Anopheles sinensis mosquito larvae and pupae were collected from irrigated rice fields and small ponds with aquatic plants, using standard 350-ml dippers. All the mosquitoes collected were identified using morphological keys [16,17] and they all belonged to An. sinensis complex. Adults reared to the F1 families were tested to minimize the influence of mosquito age and blood feeding history in this study.

Insecticide susceptibility bioassay

Anopheles sinensis female adult mosquitoes at 2–3 days post-emergence were used for susceptibility to four insecticides (4% DDT, 0.05% deltamethrin, 0.15% cyfluthrin, and 5% malathion), using the standard WHO resistance tube assay [18]. Bioassays were performed at a temperature ranging from 26°C to 28°C with 70% relative humidity. For each insecticide, a total of 100 approximately female mosquitoes were tested in insecticide susceptibility bioassays, with 20 mosquitoes per tube. A laboratory susceptible strain maintained in the insectary for more than 120 generation with no insecticide exposure was used as a susceptible mosquito control. Susceptible mosquitoes were exposed to the corresponding control papers impregnated with coal oil (DDT control), silicone oil (deltamethrin control), acetone oil (cyfluthrin control), and olive oil (malathion control). After insecticide treated for an hour, mosquitoes were transferred to recovery cups and maintained on 8% sucrose solution for 24 hrs, then the quantity of surviving mosquitoes was counted. If control mortality was between 5 and 20%, then the observed mortality was corrected according to the mortality rates of the respective control groups using Abbott’s formula following the WHO test procedures [19]. If the control mortality was below 5%, it was ignored and no correction was necessary. If the control mortality was above 20%, the tests were discarded. The bioassay results were summarized in three resistance classes as defined by WHO, susceptible if mortality was 98% or higher, possible resistant if mortality was 80–97%, and resistant if the mortality was less than 80% [20].

Results

This is the first investigation of malaria vectors susceptibility to insecticides in Shandong province recently. The susceptibility of tested mosquitoes to 4% DDT, 0.05% deltamethrin, 0.15% cyfluthrin, and 5% malathion from 2003–2012 was presented in Table 1. The An. sinensis susceptible strain was susceptible to four insecticides. Abott’s formula was used to correct mortality rates of the sample with mortalities in the control group were 5-20%. No correction was required for the others populations, mortalities in control groups being below 5%.
Table 1

Mortality rate and resistance status in a batch of An. sinensis in 10 replicates exposed to four insecticides

Year

DDT

Deltamethrin

Cyfluthrin

Malathion

N

Mortality%

Resistance status

N

Mortality%

Resistance status

N

Mortality%

Resistance status

N

Mortality%

Resistance status

2003

101

58.93

R

96

81.37

M

102

80.60

M

108

47.37

R

2004

108

45.48

R

103

84.17

M

106

73.04

R

117

48.34

R

2005

99

33.37

R

104

73.58

R

112

63.29

R

105

56.52

R

2006

125

31.43

R

120

58.33

R

107

60.54

R

102

60.78

R

2007

117

38.54

R

115

58.50

R

114

47.55

R

107

69.16

R

2008

113

47.67

R

108

56.48

R

103

40.90

R

114

75.21

R

2009

107

47.31

R

104

50.22

R

118

33.05

R

120

77.11

R

2010

116

40.11

R

107

47.74

R

106

38.68

R

116

75.00

R

2011

115

30.43

R

113

44.25

R

100

30.77

R

103

81.60

M

2012

121

30.40

R

101

35.80

R

109

32.40

R

108

86.62

M

Mean

 

40.37

  

59.04

  

50.08

  

67.77

 

N: Total number of mosquitoes tested.

Overall, the resistance status of An. sinensis showed a significant decrease in the mortality rates in DDT, deltamethrin and cyfluthrin during the past ten years. The corrected mortality rates were all below 80% for 4% DDT tested (Table 1). According to WHO criteria [20], An. sinensis mosquitoes from Shandong province were resistant to DDT for 10 years at least with a reduced mortality from 58.93% to 30.40%. From 2007 to 2009, DDT showed a transitory increase for mortality to mosquitoes, but expressed crosscurrent for the following four years.

The populations showed obvious reduction in susceptibility to both deltamethrin ranging from 81.37% to 35.80% and cyfluthrin from 80.60% to 32.40%. In the beginning of the study, the resistance level of the An. sinensis to deltamethrin and cyfluthrin were evaluated as “M” level. There was a significant decrease of mortality for the following test, the highest percentage of mosquitoes surviving the WHO diagnostic doses were seen in 2012 for deltamethrin and 2011 for cyfluthrin. Conversely, fold increase of mortality to malathion was observed throughout the assay, ranging from 47.37% to 86.62%. The mosquitoes were resistant to malathion in the early years and became medium resistant from the year 2011. The ten year mean difference in mortality rate for mosquitoes exposed to DDT was 40.37% (95% CI = 23.63-48.33); deltamethrin 59.04% (95% CI = 40.23-70.02); cyfluthrin 50.08% (95% CI = 32.76-60.24) and malathion 67.77% (95% CI = 46.03-77.19).

Discussion

The study demonstrated that field populations of An. sinensis from Shandong province developed high resistance to three insecticides tested, including DDT, deltamethrin and cyfluthrin. The resistance was extremely prevalent and sustained, as more than 40% of mosquitoes survived the diagnostic dose for resistance, and in some cases up to 70% of the tested mosquitoes survived the bioassay. It could be inferred preliminarily that under long-term high insecticide selection pressure, Anopheles mosquitoes had evolved a strong resistance to various insecticides.

For An. sinensis, malathion was an effective insecticide in this study. From 2006, malathion was more effective than the others, as Anopheles mosquitoes treated by malathion exhibited a significantly higher mortality rate than the population for the other three insecticides tested.

This investigation displayed a significant reduction in the mean mortality rate for DDT, deltamethrin and cyfluthrin over the 10 year-period, indicating the existence of knockdown resistance in An. sinensis in Shandong province. Decrease in the mean mortality rates to pyrethroid (deltamethrin and cyfluthrin) and organochlorine (DDT) was interrelated, which agreed with some recent studies on An. sinensis in China [21-24]. Although the 24 h post-exposure mortality rate using DDT showed a fewer decrease compared to deltamethrin and cyfluthrin, the overall reduction in the mean mortality rate across all the three insecticides over the 10-year period suggested cross-resistance to pyrethroid and organochlorine.

It is known that pyrethroid insecticides are neurotoxins and share many characteristics with DDT including a negative temperature coefficient, a rapid knockdown effect followed by a lethal effect [25]. Furthermore, knockdown resistance (kdr) is a type of target-site resistance arising from point mutations in the sodium channel genes of the insect nervous system and is one of the mechanisms to confer cross-resistance to DDT and pyrethroids [26]. The resistance relationship between pyrethroid and DDT were also reported on Anopheles gambiae s.s. populations from Cameroon [27,28] and Anopheles arabiensis populations from Sudan [29,30]. From 1980s, DDT had been inhibited to be used on food supplies, fruits and vegetables in china. The mortality of Anopheles mosquitoes treated by DDT in 2012 was decreased obviously compared with the mortality in 2003. This test confirmed the correlation in mosquito resistance between pyrethroid and DDT.

Deltamethrin and cyfluthrin are the major pyrethroid insecticides for mosquito control and pest control in agriculture in Shandong province. The resistance to deltamethrin had risen significantly in the malaria-endemic areas compared to those in the 1990s [9]. The investigation revealed that the mortality to An. sinensis treated by deltamethrin decreased year after year for about nine years.

It has been suggested that insecticide resistance could be accentuated by the exposure of mosquito populations to pollutants and pesticides used in agriculture [31-34]. However, studies on An. gambiae s.l. have shown a strong correlation between resistance phenotype and kdr genotypes, announcing reduced susceptibility to pyethroid insecticides is mainly due to increased target site insensitivity caused by the kdr allele [35,36]. On the other hand, tests on An. sinensis determined that kdr mutations played a small role in resistance to some kind of insecticides tested including pyrethroid. Results provided in the study on An. gambiae revealed that kdr may act with certain co-factors that were thus far unidentified [30,37]. This resistance mechanism could be multigenic, and the kdr genotype might not fully explain all the variance in the resistance phenotype and the causal relationship between the kdr genotype and susceptibility to DDT and pyrethroids [38,39]. It has been reported that enhanced levels or modified activities of esterases and other detoxifying enzymes could prevent some insecticides from reaching their site of action [40]. The relationship between organophosphate resistance and high levels of esterases have been discussed in several studies [41,42]. Meanwhile, insensitive acetyl cholinesterase (AChE) is another common resistance mechanism to organophosphate insecticides [43]. Further understanding of the genetic basis of insecticide resistance is an essential step to implement more effective vector control strategies.

Since the mid-1980s, pyrethroids have been the dominant insecticides with pyrethroids-treated areas constituting more than one third of the total insecticide- treated area in China [9,44]. The rise in resistance of An. sinensis is probably facilitated by the intensive use of pyrethroids in agriculture, wood industry and public health in Shandong province. Malathion has been used to protect grain and control flies or cockroach but less extensively, resulting in the possible resistance in An. sinensis. In order to fight against mosquito resistance, pyrethroid insecticides with other types of insecticides in both public health and agricultural production need to be used restrictively and alternately.

This study shows for the first time the development of insecticide resistance in An. sinensis in Shandong province. However, there were some limitations in the study. Molecular confirmation of the existence of the kdr alleles and establishment the type of resistance were not done which means that the relationship between the development of the kdr mutations and the resistance could not established. At the same time, there is great need for continuous insecticide susceptibility testing on larval sampling in monitoring the efficacy of common insecticide and exploring the molecular basis of insecticide resistance since mosquitoes might develop different resistant mechanisms with different metabolic pathways in the larval and adult stages.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This research was financed by National Natural Science Funds of China 81201317 and Research Award Fund for outstanding Young Scientists of Shandong province bs2011SW032.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Entomology, Shandong Institute of Parasitic Diseases
(2)
Henan Entry-exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau of P.R.C

References

  1. Chareonviriyaphap T, Bangs MJ, Ratanatham S. Status of malaria in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2000;31:225–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ma YJ, Yang MN, Fan Y, Wu J, Ma Y, Xu JN. Population structure of the malaria vector Anopheles sinensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in China: two gene pools inferred by microsatellites. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22219.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Chareonviriyaphap T, Patil AP, Temperley WH, et al. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Asia-Pacific region: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic precis. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:89.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhen TM, Hu YX, Fan TB. [Distribution of mosquitoes from various topography in Shandong Province] (in Chinese). Chin J Parasitic Dis Control. 1990;3:319–21.Google Scholar
  5. Dai YH, Wang HF, Cheng P, Liu LJ, Zhao YQ, Wang HW, et al. Mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) reported from Shandong Province, China. J Entomol Sci. 2011;46:247–55.Google Scholar
  6. Van Bortel W, Trung HD, Thuan le K, Sochantha T, Socheat D, Sumrandee C, et al. The insecticide resistance status of malaria vectors in the Mekong region. Malar J. 2008;7:102.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. WHO. Global plan for insecticide resistance management in malaria vectors. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, World Health Organization; 2012.Google Scholar
  8. Zhong DB, Chang XL, Zhou GF, He ZB, Fu FY, Yan ZT, et al. Relationship between knockdown resistance, metabolic detoxification and organismal resistance to pyrethroids in Anopheles sinensis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55475.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang DQ, Xia ZG, Zhou SS, Zhou XN, Wang RB, Zhang QF. A potential threat to malaria elimination: extensive deltamethrin and DDT resistance to Anopheles sinensis from the malaria-endemic areas in China. Malar J. 2013;12:164.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pei SJ, Li KJ, Hu LQ. Field survey of resistance of Anopheles sinensis to deltamethrin in Hubei Province](in Chinese). Chin Trop Med. 2010;10:792–3.Google Scholar
  11. Zhou HY, Li JL, Jin XL, Wang WM, Zhu GD, Gu YP, et al. [Surveillance on Resistance of Anopheles Vectors to Pyrethroid in Jiangsu Province](in Chinese). Chin J Schistosomiasis Contr. 2004;16:199–201.Google Scholar
  12. Pan B, Zhu TH, Liu YY, Wu WG. [The main malaria vectors resistance to insecticide in China](in Chinese). Chin J Vector Biol Contr. 2001;12:145–8.Google Scholar
  13. Tan Y, Zhou WN, Zhou JG, Wang HB. [Rapid detection on the susceptibility of Anophelines to pyrethroids used in the impregnation of bed nets in Napo County, Guangxi](in Chinese). Chin J Parasitic Dis Contr. 2002;15:249–50.Google Scholar
  14. Liu Y, Chen JS, Zhou RM, Qian D, Chen QW, Xu BL, et al. [Investigation on the Sensitivity of Anopheles sinensis to Insecticides] (in Chinese). Chin J Parasit Dis Contr. 2012;30:309–11.Google Scholar
  15. WHO. Use of indoor residual spraying for scaling up global malaria control and elimination. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO position statement; 2006.Google Scholar
  16. Ministry of Health Disease Prevention and Control Bureau. Handbook for malaria control and prevention. Beijing: People’s Hygiene Publishing House Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Dong X. The Mosquito Fauna of Yunnan (Volumes one). Yunnan Publishing Group Corporation, Yunnan Science & Technology Press: Kunming; 2010.Google Scholar
  18. WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
  19. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. WHO. Report of the WHO informal consultation. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vectors, bio-efficacy and persistence of insecticides on treated surfaces. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO/CDS/CPC/MAL/98.12; 1998.Google Scholar
  21. Song W, Ma E-J, Qun L. Resistance of to deltamethrin in three counties of Hefei city (in Chinese). Chin J Vector Biol Contr. 2012;23:216–7.Google Scholar
  22. Zeng LH, Wang SQ, Sun DW, Zhao W, Li SG, Yang X. [Resistance assay of malaria vectors to four kinds of common insecticides in some endemic areas of Hainan Province](in Chinese). Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 2011;29:200–3.Google Scholar
  23. Yu PH, Hu LQ, Liu LY, Huang GQ, Zhang HX, Chen H, et al. [The field investigation on the resistance of Anopheles in Jingshan, Anlu and Xiaochang of Hubei province](in Chinese). Chin J Vector Biol Contr. 2008;19:500–2.Google Scholar
  24. Li JL, Zhou HY, Cao J, Zhu GD, Wang WM, Gu Y, et al. [Sensitivity of to insecticides in Jiangsu Province](in Chinese). Chin J Schistosomiasis Contr. 2011;23:296–300.Google Scholar
  25. Miller TA. Mechanisms of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Parasitol Today. 1988;4:S8–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Soderlund DM, Knipple DC. The molecular biology of knockdown resistance to pyrethroid insecticide. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;33:563–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Etang J, Manga L, Chandre F, Guillet P, Fondjo E, Mimpfoundi R, et al. Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles gambiae s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Republic of Cameroon. J Med Entomol. 2003;40:491–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Etang J, Fondjo E, Chandre F, Brengues C, Nwane P, Chouaibou M, et al. First report of knockdown mutations in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae from Cameroon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:795–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Abdalla H, Matambo TS, Koekemoer LL. Insecticide susceptibility and vector status of natural populations of from Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:263–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nwane P, Etang J, Chouaibou M, Toto JC, Kerah-Hinzoumbé C, Mimpfoundi R, et al. Trends in DDT and pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.s. populations from urban and agro-industrial settings in southern Cameroon. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:163.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Poupardin R, Reynaud S, Strode C, Ranson H, Vontas J, David JP. Cross-induction of detoxification genes by environmental xenobiotics and insecticides in the mosquito Aedes aegypti: Impact on larval tolerance to chemical insecticides. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;38:540–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Riaz MA, Poupardin R, Reynaud S, Strode C, Ranson H, David JP. Impact of glyphosate and benzo[a]pyrene on the tolerance of mosquito larvae to chemical insecticides. Role of detoxification genes in response to xenobiotics. Aquat Toxicol. 2009;93:61–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Boyer S, David JP, Rey D, Lemperiere G, Ravanel P. Response of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae to three xenobiotic exposures: larval tolerance and detoxifying enzyme activities. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006;25:470–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Akoobeto M, Guiguemde TR, Darriet F, et al. The role of agricultural use of insecticides in resistance to pyrethroids in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:617–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Stump AD, Atieli FK, Vulule JM, Besansky NJ. Dynamics of the pyrethroid knockdown resistance allele in western Kenyan populations of Anopheles gambiae in response to insecticide-treated bed net trials. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70:591–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Berge JB, Devonshire AL, et al. Molecular characterisation of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998;7:179–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bass C, Nikou D, Donnelly MJ, Williamson MS, Ranson H, Ball A, et al. Detection of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Anopheles gambiae: a comparison of two new high-throughput assays with existing methods. Malar J. 2007;6:111.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Brooke BD. Kdr: can a single mutation produce an entire insecticide resistance phenotype? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:524–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Donnelly MJ, Corbel V, Weetman D, Wilding CS, Williamson MS, Black WC. Does kdr genotype predict insecticide-resistance phenotype in mosquitoes. Trends Parasitol. 2009;25:213–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hemmingway J, Ranson H. Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:371–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Georghiou GP, Pasteur N. Organophosphate resistance and esterase pattern in a natural population of the southern house mosquito from California. J Econ Entomol. 1980;73:489–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Alout H, Labbe P, Pasteur N, Weill M. High incidence of Ace1 duplicated haplotypes in resistant Culex pipiens mosquitoes from Algeria. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;41:29–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Fournier D, Mutero A. Modification of acetylcholinesterase as a mechanism of resistance to insecticides. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1994;108:19–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Huang J, Qiao F, Zhang L, Rozelle S. Farm pesticides, rice production, and human health in China. Singapore: Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia; 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Dai et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement