Open Access

Naturally-acquired cellular immune response against Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein-1 paralog antigen

  • Siriruk Changrob1,
  • Chaniya Leepiyasakulchai1,
  • Takafumi Tsuboi2,
  • Yang Cheng3, 4,
  • Chae Seung Lim5,
  • Patchanee Chootong1Email author and
  • Eun-Taek Han3Email author
Malaria Journal201514:159

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0681-8

Received: 11 December 2014

Accepted: 5 April 2015

Published: 15 April 2015

Abstract

Background

Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein-1 paralog (PvMSP1P) is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein expressed on the merozoite surface. This molecule is a target of natural immunity, as high anti-MSP1P-19 antibody levels were detected during P. vivax infection and the antibody inhibited PvMSP1P-erythrocyte binding. Recombinant PvMSP1P antigen results in production of a significant Th1 cytokine response in immunized mice. The present study was performed to characterize natural cellular immunity against PvMSP1P-19 and PvDBP region II in acute and recovery P. vivax infection.

Methods

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from acute and recovery P. vivax infection were obtained for lymphocyte proliferation assay upon PvMSP1P-19 and PvDBP region II antigen stimulation. The culture supernatant was examined for the presence of the cytokines IL-2, TNF, IFN-γ and IL-10 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To determine whether Th1 or Th2 have a memory response against PvMSP1P-19 and PvDBPII protein antigen, PBMCs from subjects who had recovered from P. vivax infection 8–10 weeks prior to the study were obtained for lymphocyte proliferation assay. Cytokine-producing cells were analysed by flow cytometry.

Results

IL-2 was detected at high levels in lymphocyte cultures from acutely infected P. vivax patients upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation. Analysis of the Th1 or Th2 memory response in PBMC cultures from subjects who had recovered from P. vivax infection showed significantly elevated levels of PvMSP1P-19 and PvDBPII-specific IFN-γ-producing cells (P  <  0.05). Interestingly, the response of IFN-γ-producing cells in PvMSP1P stimulation was fourfold greater in recovered subjects than that in acute-infection patients. CD4+ T cells were the major cell phenotype involved in the response to PvMSP1P-19 and PvDBPII antigen.

Conclusions

PvMSP1P-19 strongly induces a specific cellular immune response for protection against P. vivax compared with PvDBPII as the antigen induces activation of IFN-γ-producing effector cells following natural P. vivax exposure. Upon stimulation, PvMSP1P-19 has the potential to activate the recall response of Th1 effector memory cells that play a role in killing the parasite.

Keywords

Plasmodium vivax PvMSP1P Cellular immune response Patients Infection

Background

Plasmodium vivax malaria is the most geographically widespread Plasmodium species and the second leading cause of malaria, especially in Southeast Asia and South America [1]. It persists as an important public health problem due to the emergence of chloroquine-resistant P. vivax parasites and the occurrence of severe and fatal vivax malaria cases [2,3]. An important part of any control strategy is the implementation of a vaccine capable of inducing protective immunity against P. vivax.

Two P. vivax vaccine candidates for the exo-erythrocytic stage, P. vivax circumsporozoite protein (PvCSP) and P. vivax surface protein 25 (Pvs25), have only entered clinical trials, whereas others are undergoing preclinical trials. Blood-stage antigens, such as apical membrane protein 1 (AMA-1), merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP-1) and Duffy binding protein (DBP), are absolutely required for vivax invasion of host erythrocytes. These are responsible for clinical manifestation of vivax disease and target vaccine candidates [4,5]. A blood-stage vaccine would be a valuable tool to reduce both the morbidity and mortality of malaria disease as well as to decrease parasitemia. Several previous reports suggested the feasibility of a blood-stage vaccine. First, immunity against blood-stage antigens can be acquired as a result of natural exposure to P. vivax infection. Serological responses to blood-stage antigen and the inhibitory effect of antibodies against erythrocyte binding increase with age, suggesting a boosting effect due to repeated exposure through recurrent infection [6,7]. Second, blood-stage antigen immunisation enhanced protection against P. vivax infection [5,8]. These data suggest the immunogenicity of blood-stage antigen. However, the ability of blood-stage antigen to undergo rapid mutation presents an important challenge for vaccine development [9-11]. An effective blood-stage vaccine must generate both humoral and cellular immune responses, overcome genetic restriction, and stimulate memory cells.

Identification of new potential vaccine antigens is important for the development of a successful novel blood-stage vaccine. Data regarding humoral and cellular immune responses against parasite molecules during natural exposure are required at the epidemiological level [12]. T cells are thought to play a central role in the regulation of immune responses and the formation of immunological memory, which can control and eliminate infection. The identification of T-cell epitopes capable of eliciting an immune response in individuals of different genetic backgrounds is necessary for design of a subunit vaccine [13,14]. Studies in both mice and humans have repeatedly shown that proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-12 (IL-12), gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) are essential mediators of protective immunity to erythrocytic-stage malaria parasites [15].

With regard to the role of new parasite antigens in the generation of both humoral and cellular responses, in this study, cellular immunity against merozoite surface protein-1 paralog of P. vivax (PvMSP1P) was evaluated in P. vivax exposed individuals. PvMSP1P is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored blood-stage protein, but is not closely related to merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP1) (11% identity and 22% similarity) [9,16]. The molecular mass, number and location of Cys residues on PvMSP1P are similar to those of PvMSP1, whereas it shows no hyperpolymorphism in the C-terminal sequence. PvMSP1P contains double EGF-like domains that play roles in merozoite invasion. In a previous in vitro study, a cytoadherence assay indicated strong binding between pEGFP-PvMSP1P-transfected COS7 cells and human erythrocytes. Serological responses to PvMSP1P-19 antigen and the inhibitory effect of anti-PvMSP1P-19 antibodies were demonstrated in individuals acute P. vivax infection [17]. Splenocytes from mice immunized with PvMSP1P-19 showed considerate secretion of Th1 cytokines [18]. These data indicate that PvMSP1P-19 antigen shows high immunogenicity in terms of induction of humoral and cellular immune responses during P. vivax infection. However, use of PvMSP1P-19 antigen as a novel vaccine candidate requires an evaluation of the naturally acquired cellular immune response as well as the memory response of T cells. This study was performed to evaluate naturally-acquired cellular immunity against PvMSP1P-19 antigen in subjects exposed to P. vivax to determine its ability to stimulate T-cell function and induce a recall response of memory T cells during P. vivax infection.

Methods

Sample collection

The study was performed in malaria-endemic areas of southern Thailand where both major species of malaria, P. vivax and Plasmodium falciparum, are common. Peripheral blood samples were obtained at malaria clinics in Tha Sae, Chumphon province, which is in the southern peninsular region of Thailand, from 20 patients with acute P. vivax infection and 15 convalescing individuals who had recovered from P. vivax infection about 8–10 weeks prior to the study. The patients were from 18–63 years old. Samples from healthy individuals as controls were also collected from 20 malaria-naive volunteers from the Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, who had no history of exposure to malaria. Venous blood samples (10 mL) were collected by venipuncture in heparin tubes for preparation of plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Vivax samples were diagnosed from thick and thin peripheral blood smears by Giemsa staining. This study was approved by the Committee on Human Rights Related to Human Experimentation, Mahidol University, and the Ministry of Health, Thailand (MUIRB2012/079.2408).

Recombinant PvMSP1P-19 protein expression

The gene fragment encoding PvMSP1P-19 was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of the P. vivax Sal I strain sequence, and cloned into the XhoI and NotI sites of the pEU-E01-His-TEV-MCS vector (CellFree Sciences, Matsuyama, Japan). The inserted nucleotide sequence was confirmed using an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer and a BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Highly purified plasmid DNA is required for in vitro transcription and subsequent translation. Plasmid DNA was then prepared using a Maxi Plus™ Ultrapure plasmid extraction system (Viogene, Taipei, Taiwan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified DNA was eluted in 0.1× TE buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA) and used for recombinant protein expression by the wheat germ cell-free (WGCF) system (CellFree Sciences) described previously [19,20]. The recombinant PvMSP1P-19 protein was purified using a Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose column (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein (PvDBP) region II, the expression vector for which was kindly provided by John H Adams, Department of Global Health, University of South Florida, USA, was expressed as described previously [21,22].

Lymphocyte proliferation assay

Heparinized whole blood was diluted in incomplete RPMI 1640 medium at a dilution of 1:1. PBMCs were isolated by overlaying with Ficoll-Hypaque (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, CA, USA) and centrifuged at 2,000 rpm, 20°C for 30 min, and then washed twice with incomplete RPMI 1640 medium. The PBMCs were then suspended in complete RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% foetal bovine serum at a density of 3 × 106 cells/mL. PBMC viability >  90% was required for lymphocyte proliferation assay (LPA). LPAs were carried out to evaluate cellular immunity against PvMSP1P-19. Aliquots of 2.5 × 105 cells/well of PBMCs were distributed in triplicate in 96-well flat-bottomed tissue culture plates (Corning Inc., New York, NY, USA) in a volume of 100 μL. The cells were then stimulated by adding 100-μL of 10-μg/mL purified recombinant antigen PvMSP1P-19 or PvDBP region II diluted in incomplete RPMI 1640. The complete RPMI 1640 medium and 2% v/v of PHA were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Cells were cultured for 96 h at 37°C under 5% CO2. After 48 and 96 h, the culture supernatant was harvested for cytokine detection.

Cytokine assay

Cytokine levels in culture supernatant obtained after 48 and 96 h of stimulation with PvMSP1P-19 were measured using an ELISA Cytokine Kit (BD OptEIA™; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). Briefly, 96-well ELISA plates were coated with monoclonal antibodies specific to IL-2, IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF. First, 50 μL of ELISA diluent were added to each well, and then 100 μL of standard reagent or culture supernatant were added to duplicate wells. The plates were shaken for 5 s and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate mixed with biotinylated anti-human cytokine antibodies was added, followed by incubation for 1 h at room temperature. The plates were washed, followed by addition of 100 μL of chromogenic substrate tetramethybenzidine (TMB) solution to each well. After incubation for 30 min at room temperature, the reaction was stopped with 50 μL of stop solution. The optical density at 450 nm (OD450) was measured within 30 min after addition of stop reagent. Each ELISA plate included a human cytokine standard curve, which was used to calculate cytokine concentrations. All specimens were analysed in duplicate and the means of the two values were used in the analyses.

Evaluation of the response of IFN-γ/IL-10 cytokine-producing cells

To evaluate the response of helper T cells upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation, the cell phenotypes were analysed by flow cytometry (BD FACScanto II; Becton Dickinson, Oxford, UK). Th1 or Th2 cells were defined by staining with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies specific to CD3 (Alexa700), CD4 (PerCP Cy5.5) and CD8 (APC Cy7) on surface antigen and fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies specific to IFN-γ (PE Cy7), IL-2 (APC), IL-4 (Alexa Fluor488) and IL-10 (PE). Briefly, PBMCs were plated in 96-well flat-bottomed tissue culture plates (Corning Inc.) at final concentrations of 5 × 105 – 1 × 106 cells/well in complete RPMI 1640. Cells were stimulated by 20 ng/mL PMA plus 1 μg/mL ionomycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) or 10 μg/mL recombinant PvMSP1P-19 antigens. To block cytokine secretion, 10 μg/mL of Brefeldin A (Sigma) was added to the culture medium and incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2. After 6 h of stimulation, cells were harvested into 5-mL polystyrene round-bottomed tubes (Corning Inc.) in 50 μL of staining buffer (PBS, 1% BSA, 0.1% NaN3) to determine cytokine production by the activated T cell population. First, the cell surface was stained with anti-CD3/CD4/CD8 at 4°C for 15 min and fixed in 0.5% paraformaldehyde solution at 4°C for 20 min. For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were permeabilized using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer system (BD Biosciences) for 30 min and stained with anti-IFN-γ/anti-IL-2/anti-IL-10 fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies for 20 min in the dark. Finally, cells were washed and maintained in staining buffer prior to flow cytometric analysis. Data were analysed using FlowJo version 7.0 (Tree Star Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using the GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, CA, USA), SigmaPlot (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences between the means of each group. In all analyses, P  <  0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Lymphocytes from acutely infected P. vivax patients responding to PvMSP1P-19

To evaluate the immunogenicity of PvMSP1P-19 in induction of PvMSP1P-19-specific T cell function during P. vivax infection, PBMCs from acutely infected P. vivax patients were subjected to lymphocyte proliferation assay. To detect lymphocyte proliferation upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation, IL-2 levels in the culture supernatant were determined by ELISA. The results showed that PvMSP1P-19 significantly stimulated IL-2 production, indicating that PvMSP1P-19 induces lymphocyte proliferation (PvMSP1P-19  =  151.50  ±  132.96 pg/mL, unstimulated  =  64.88  ±  44.26 pg/mL, P  <  0.05, Figure 1a). However, the proinflammatory cytokine, TNF, was detected at low levels in cultures of lymphocytes from acute P. vivax patients (PvMSP1P-19  =  172.32  ±  175.86 pg/mL, unstimulated  =  126.64  ±  163.15, P  >  0.05).
Figure 1

Cytokine production of PvMSP1P-19-stimulated lymphocyte cultures obtained from individuals with acute P. vivax infection (n  =  15). PBMCs were re-stimulated with PvMSP1P-19 antigen for 48 h and culture supernatant was removed for cytokine detection. (a) IL-2 detection after 48 h of in vitro stimulation. (b) TNF, IFN-γ and IL-10 after 96 h of in vitro stimulation.

Since cell-mediated immunity was found to be induced and regulated by cytokines, in this study, the levels of IFN-γ and IL-10 were measured to identify effector T cell phenotype responding to PvMSP1P-19 antigen in acute P. vivax infection. PvMSP1P-19 stimulation did not induce a Th1 or Th2 response, as demonstrated by the low levels of IFN-γ (PvMSP1P-19  =  48.88  ±  73.68 pg/mL, unstimulated  =  30.09  ±  30.10 pg/mL, P > 0.05, Figure 1b) and IL-10 (PvMSP1P-19  =  119.17  ±  104.10 pg/mL, unstimulated  =  67.32  ±  98.91 pg/mL, P  >  0.05, Figure 1b) in PvMSP1P-19 cultures. The levels of all cytokines produced in response to PHA were two- to five-fold higher than those in response to PvMSP1P-19 or PvDBP region II antigen (Figure 1). Lymphocyte from control subjects not exposed to malaria showed no significant response of IL-2, TNF, IFN-γ or IL-10 production upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation compared to the medium control. These results suggest that P. vivax produced PvMSP1P-19-specific effector T cells in response to natural exposure, and a recall proliferative response of effector cells specific to PvMSP1P-19 occurred after restimulation of these effector cells by PvMSP1P-19 antigen.

Recall response of IFN-γ and IL-10 cytokines against PvMSP1P-19 antigen

To evaluate the memory response of lymphocytes on PvMSP1P-19 stimulation, 15 samples of PBMCs were obtained from P. vivax individuals who had recovered 8–10 weeks prior to the study for lymphocyte proliferation assay. PvMSP1P-19 significantly stimulated production of IFN-γ by lymphocytes from recovered subjects compared to unstimulated controls (PvMSP1P-19  =  176.58  ±  199.05 pg/mL, unstimulated  =  38.21  ±  43.09 pg/mL, P  <  0.05, Figure 2). For IL-10, both PvMSP1P-19 and PvDBP region II antigen strongly induced IL-10 response (PvMSP1P-19  =  113.26  ±  107.90 pg/mL, PvDBPII  =  89.59  ±  99.81 pg/mL, unstimulated  =  65.44  ±  80.50 pg/mL, P  <  0.05, Figure 2). The levels of all cytokines produced in response to PHA were fivefold higher than those in response to PvMSP1P-19 antigen. Interestingly, upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation, the IFN-γ levels in lymphocyte cultures from subjects who had recovered from P. vivax infection, were increased by four-folds compared to acute P. vivax patients. Moreover, PvMSP1P-19 induced IFN-γ production to a level two-folds, that induced by PvDBP region II (Figure 2). High IFN-γ and IL-10 production upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation suggested that individuals recovered from P. vivax in endemic areas are capable of producing memory IFN-γ and IL-10 cells specific to PvMSP1P-19 antigen. Upon re-exposure to P. vivax antigen, PvMSP1P-19 antigen showed the ability to stimulate the memory T-cell response, suggesting that these cells are important regulators of the immune response to Plasmodium.
Figure 2

The recall of a cellular immune response specific to PvMSP1P-19 antigen by induction of IFN-γ and IL-10 cytokine responses. PBMCs from individuals who had recovered from P. vivax infection 8–10 weeks prior to the study were stimulated by PvMSP1P-19 or PvDBPII antigen with negative (media) and positive controls (PHA) for 96 h. IFN-γ and IL-10 levels in the culture supernatant were measured by ELISA. Data show the average cytokine values from P. vivax-recovered subjects (n  =  20). Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test. The level of significance was set at P  <  0.05.

CD4+ T cells play a role in the immune response to PvMSP1P-19 antigen

Many different IFN-γ-producing cell subsets, including to αβ T cells, γδ T cells and NK cells, have been shown to be capable of responding to Plasmodium parasites. Here, the phenotype of cells involved in the IFN-γ and IL-10 response upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis (Figure 3). Upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation, CD4+ T cells were the major source of IL-2 and IFN-γ production. PvMSP1P-19 stimulation showed significantly higher IL-2 and IFN-γ levels than the medium control (IL-2, PvMSP1P-19  =  0.070%  ±  0.041%, unstimulated  =  0.041%  ±  0.023%, P  <  0.05; IFN-γ, PvMSP1P-19  =  0.112%  ±  0.053%, unstimulated  =  0.037%  ±  0.022%, P  <  0.05, Figures 4a-b). The effector CD4+ IFN-γ+ response to PvMSP1P-19 antigen was double that of CD8+ T cells (Figure 4a). Similarly, PvDBP region II antigen also had a high potential to induce CD4+ IFN+ T cell response (PvDBPII  =  0.094%  ±  0.046%, unstimulated  =  0.037%  ±  0.022%, P  <  0.05, Figure 4b). Phenotyping of IL-10-producing cells upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation showed that CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were not major sources of IL-10 (CD4+, PvMSP1P-19  =  0.008%  ±  0.012%, unstimulated  =  0.002%  ±  0.002%, CD8+, PvMSP1P-19  =  0.008%  ±  0.009%, unstimulated  =  0.005%  ±  0.007%, P  >  0.05, Figure 5). These data suggest that CD4+ T cells dominate over CD8+ T cells in the responses against PvMSP1P-19 and PvDBP region II antigens.
Figure 3

T-cell responses to PvMSP1P-19 antigen using multiparameter flow cytometry. Intracellular cytokine assay demonstrating the T-cell response of P. vivax-recovered subjects to PvMSP1P-19 or PvDBPII with negative (media) and positive controls (PMA/Ionomycin). PBMCs from individuals who had recovered from P. vivax infection 8–10 weeks prior to the study were removed for lymphocyte proliferation assay and intracellular cytokine detection by flow cytometric analysis. The data are shown as the average levels of cytokine-producing cells in individual subjects (n  =  6). This shows the gating strategy to identify IL-2/IFN-γ/IL-10-producing cells.

Figure 4

T-cell responses to PvMSP1P-19 antigen using multiparameter flow cytometry. (a) Overall PvMSP1P-19-specific IL-2-producing cells. (b) IFN-γ-producing cells. Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test. The level of significance was set at P  <  0.05.

Figure 5

T-cell responses to PvMSP1P-19 antigen using multiparameter flow cytometry. IL-10-producing cells. Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test. The level of significance was set at P  <  0.05.

Discussion

Here, the immunogenicity of PvMSP1P-19 in terms of stimulation of cellular immunity was evaluated in subjects exposed to P. vivax both during acute infection and 8–10 weeks following recovery. PvMSP1P-19-specific effector T cells from acute and recovery P. vivax-exposed subjects produced IL-2 and IFN-γ after re-stimulation with PvMSP1P-19 in vitro. CD4+ T cells play a major role in the immune response against this antigen. The results of the present study suggest that the immune response of PvMSP1P-19-specific T cells is not only readily induced following P. vivax infection but also persists in the absence of further exposure.

In this study, the ability of PBMCs to produce both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in response to stimulation with blood parasite antigen, recombinant PvMSP1P-19 and PvDBP region II antigen was evaluated. PBMCs from symptomatic P. vivax infection individuals were obtained in this study as representative of the total malaria-reactive T-cell pool during P. vivax exposure. Although malaria-reactive T cells tend to disappear from the peripheral circulation during acute infection, probably migrating to the spleen and liver, they are released back into the periphery upon resolution of the infection. Thus, the selection of peripheral blood as the source of leukocytes has been validated in many previous studies [23].

The parasite induces a specific immune response by stimulating the release of cytokines, and this may have an important function in activating the host’s immune cells to react to the parasite [24,25]. PBMCs from subjects with acute P. vivax infection produced high levels of IL-2 but only low levels of IFN-γ and IL-10 were detected in response to PvMSP1P-19 antigen, suggesting that IFN-γ- and IL-10-producing effector cells specific to PvMSP1P-19 did not play a major role in killing the parasite in acute P. vivax infection. A significant IL-2 cytokine response may assist IL-4/IL-5/IL-13- or IL-17-producing effector helper cells, as previously shown in studies of cell expansion in acute malaria [26,27]. Macrophages in acutely infected PBMC cultures did not produce TNF. Thus, PvMSP1P-19 protein may not directly induce an inflammatory response, as shown in a previous study in which malarial pigment and certain glycolipids, such as the GPI moiety, stimulated production of the inflammatory cytokine TNF [24].

Immune responses to malaria parasites have been shown to be short-lived following exposure. The response was based mainly on cellular immunity against individual malaria antigens, and was relatively short-lived, declining within a few years of exposure [28] or at least being unstable, but occasionally persisting. However, our understanding of the memory immune response in malaria remains relatively poor [29]. The results of the present study demonstrated a recall response of memory CD4+ T cells in natural P. vivax exposure. The subsequent cellular immune response in subjects who had recovered from P. vivax infection 8–10 weeks previously showed significantly elevated IFN-γ responses to specific PvMSP1P-19 stimulation. CD4+ T cells were the main source of IFN-γ in response to this antigen. This was consistent with previous reports that IFN-γ responses are associated with protection against malaria both among volunteers undergoing experimentally induced infection and naturally exposed human populations [28,30-33]. Therefore, elevation of IFN-γ production upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation could be explained by production of effector Th1 cells or memory cells specific to PvMSP1P-19 in malaria-recovered human populations, and that effector cells could be re-stimulated to produce IFN-γ, indicating a boosting of cellular immunity in individuals following natural exposure to the P. vivax parasite. However, further studies are required to determine the longevity of PvMSP1P-19-specific Th1 cells and their protective effects against malaria.

Interestingly, this study showed that no evidence of immediate CD4+ and CD8+ effector cell producing IL-10 upon short-term in vitro PvMSP1P-19 stimulation. IL-10 secretion seemed to occur significant later (accumulating at 96 h in culture supernatant). Levels of IL-10 cytokine significantly increased in lymphocyte cultures from subjects who had recovered from P. vivax infection. These data indicated that regulatory responses by IL-10 producing cells may reside within the memory population and that PvMSP1P-19 re-stimulation may be secondary activation of Th1 cells. The cellular source of IL-10 in culture supernatants is not known. There are many sources of IL-10, being produced mainly by Foxp3+ regulatory T cells [34]. B cells secreting IL-10 in an antigen specific manner have been described in mice but the antigen specificity of IL-10-secreting B cells is poorly documented in humans and they are found at much lower frequencies than IL-10 producing T cells [35]. Elevation of IL-10 levels after PvMSP1P-19 stimulation in vitro supported the sustainability of IL-10-producing effector cells after parasite clearance, as shown previously [30]. A balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines is required for parasite clearance without inducing excessive host pathology. High levels of IFN-γ production consistent with the IL-10 response upon PvMSP1P-19 stimulation may suggest regulation of the inflammatory response and clearance of the parasite simultaneously.

A number of blood-stage candidate vaccines have progressed to clinical trials but none has yet produced good evidence of protection against clinical malaria. Three of these vaccine candidates, MSP, AMA1 and DBP, were designed to induce protective antibodies capable of reducing or blocking parasite growth [36-39]. Here, the response of T cells against the merozoite antigen, PvMSP1P-19, in comparison to PvDBP region II was demonstrated. PvMSP1P-19 blood-stage antigens stimulated CD4+ T-cell response, and as a result showed significantly higher IFN-γ levels in lymphocyte cultures. The activation of CD4+ T cells specific to PvMSP1P-19 suggests that this antigen can polarize the Th1 cell response, as shown for MSP1 and MSP3 antigens [39,40], inducing IFN-γ after re-stimulation in vitro. The results of the present study support a role for MSP1P-19 protein in the development of IFN-γ-secreting T lymphocytes.

Conclusions

PBMCs from subjects who had recovered from P. vivax infection produced high levels of IFN-γ after PvMSP1P-19 re-stimulation in vitro. This study suggested that an immune response consisting of PvMSP1P-19-specific T cells is induced following infection and had a boosting effect on cellular immunity in individuals following exposure to the P. vivax parasite. The development of a protective P. vivax vaccine will require antigen to generate an effector Th1 cell response as well as the ability to induce memory cells, such as the specific immune response against PvMSP1P-19 antigen indicated in this study.

Abbreviations

PvMSP1P: 

Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein-1 paralog

PBMCs: 

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

LPA: 

Lymphocyte proliferation assay

PHA: 

Phytohaemagglutinin

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant of the Korea Health technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A121180). We thank all the staff at Tha Sae and Malaria Clinic, Vector Borne Disease Control 11.4, Chumphon Province, Thailand for collection of the samples.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University
(2)
Division of Malaria Research Proteo-Science Center, Ehime University
(3)
Department of Medical Environmental Biology and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University
(4)
Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH)
(5)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital

References

  1. Autino B, Noris A, Russo R, Castelli F. Epidemiology of malaria in endemic areas. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2012;4:e2012060.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mandal S. Epidemiological aspects of vivax and falciparum malaria: global spectrum. Asian Pacific J Trop Dis. 2014;4:S13–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Anstey NM, Russell B, Yeo TW, Price RN. The pathophysiology of vivax malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2009;25:220–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Herrera S, Corradin G, Arevalo-Herrera M. An update on the search for a Plasmodium vivax vaccine. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23:122–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wipasa J, Elliott S, Xu H, Good MF. Immunity to asexual blood stage malaria and vaccine approaches. Immunol Cell Biol. 2002;80:401–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chelimo K, Embury PB, Sumba PO, Vulule J, Ofulla AV, Long C, et al. Age-related differences in naturally acquired T cell memory to Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 1. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24852.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Riccio EK, Totino PR, Pratt-Riccio LR, Ennes-Vidal V, Soares IS, Rodrigues MM, et al. Cellular and humoral immune responses against the Plasmodium vivax MSP-119 malaria vaccine candidate in individuals living in an endemic area in north-eastern Amazon region of Brazil. Malar J. 2013;12:326.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Han HJ, Park SG, Kim SH, Hwang SY, Han J, Traicoff J, et al. Epidermal growth factor-like motifs 1 and 2 of Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein 1 are critical domains in erythrocyte invasion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;320:563–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang Y, Kaneko O, Sattabongkot J, Chen JH, Lu F, Chai JY, et al. Genetic polymorphism of Plasmodium vivax msp1p, a paralog of merozoite surface protein 1, from worldwide isolates. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84:292–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole-Tobian J, King CL. Diversity and natural selection in Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein gene. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2003;127:121–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Valizadeh V, Zakeri S, Mehrizi AA, Djadid ND. Population genetics and natural selection in the gene encoding the Duffy binding protein II in Iranian Plasmodium vivax wild isolates. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;21:424–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Siddiqui AA, Bora H, Singh N, Dash AP, Sharma YD. Expression, purification, and characterization of the immunological response to a 40-kilodalton Plasmodium vivax tryptophan-rich antigen. Infect Immun. 2008;76:2576–86.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Joshi SK, Bharadwaj A, Chatterjee S, Chauhan VS. Analysis of immune responses against T- and B-cell epitopes from Plasmodium falciparum liver-stage antigen 1 in rodent malaria models and malaria-exposed human subjects in India. Infect Immun. 2000;68:141–50.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nardin EH, Nussenzweig RS. T cell responses to pre-erythrocytic stages of malaria: role in protection and vaccine development against pre-erythrocytic stages. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993;11:687–727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Artavanis-Tsakonas K, Riley EM. Innate immune response to malaria: rapid induction of IFN-gamma from human NK cells by live Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. J Immunol. 2002;169:2956–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bozdech Z, Mok S, Hu G, Imwong M, Jaidee A, Russell B, et al. The transcriptome of Plasmodium vivax reveals divergence and diversity of transcriptional regulation in malaria parasites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:16290–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng Y, Wang Y, Ito D, Kong DH, Ha KS, Chen JH, et al. The Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein 1 paralog is a novel erythrocyte-binding ligand of P. vivax. Infect Immun. 2013;81:1585–95.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng Y, Shin EH, Lu F, Wang B, Choe J, Tsuboi T, et al. Antigenicity studies in humans and immunogenicity studies in mice: an MSP1P subdomain as a candidate for malaria vaccine development. Microbes Infect. 2014;16:419–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen JH, Jung JW, Wang Y, Ha KS, Lu F, Lim CS, et al. Immunoproteomics profiling of blood stage Plasmodium vivax infection by high-throughput screening assays. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:6479–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tsuboi T, Takeo S, Iriko H, Jin L, Tsuchimochi M, Matsuda S, et al. Wheat germ cell-free system-based production of malaria proteins for discovery of novel vaccine candidates. Infect Immun. 2008;76:1702–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Michon P, Fraser T, Adams JH. Naturally acquired and vaccine-elicited antibodies block erythrocyte cytoadherence of the Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3164–71.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. VanBuskirk KM, Sevova E, Adams JH. Conserved residues in the Plasmodium vivax Duffy-binding protein ligand domain are critical for erythrocyte receptor recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:15754–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rhee MS, Akanmori BD, Waterfall M, Riley EM. Changes in cytokine production associated with acquired immunity to Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Exp Immunol. 2001;126:503–10.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Malaguarnera L, Musumeci S. The immune response to Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:472–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zeyrek FY, Kurcer MA, Zeyrek D, Simsek Z. Parasite density and serum cytokine levels in Plasmodium vivax malaria in Turkey. Parasite Immunol. 2006;28:201–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bueno LL, Morais CG, Lacerda MV, Fujiwara RT, Braga EM. Interleukin-17 producing T helper cells are increased during natural Plasmodium vivax infection. Acta Trop. 2012;123:53–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Winkler S, Willheim M, Baier K, Schmid D, Aichelburg A, Graninger W, et al. Reciprocal regulation of Th1- and Th2-cytokine-producing T cells during clearance of parasitemia in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Infect Immun. 1998;66:6040–4.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Struik SS, Riley EM. Does malaria suffer from lack of memory? Immunol Rev. 2004;201:268–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Langhorne J, Ndungu FM, Sponaas AM, Marsh K. Immunity to malaria: more questions than answers. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:725–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Keating SM, Bejon P, Berthoud T, Vuola JM, Todryk S, Webster DP, et al. Durable human memory T cells quantifiable by cultured enzyme-linked immunospot assays are induced by heterologous prime boost immunization and correlate with protection against malaria. J Immunol. 2005;175:5675–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Good MF, Bilsborough J. Human T-cell responses to malaria: mostly forgotten or committed to memory? Parasitol Today. 1994;10:316–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wipasa J, Okell L, Sakkhachornphop S, Suphavilai C, Chawansuntati K, Liewsaree W, et al. Short-lived IFN-gamma effector responses, but long-lived IL-10 memory responses, to malaria in an area of low malaria endemicity. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1001281.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Achtman AH, Bull PC, Stephens R, Langhorne J. Longevity of the immune response and memory to blood-stage malaria infection. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2005;297:71–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Jangpatarapongsa K, Chootong P, Sattabongkot J, Chotivanich K, Sirichaisinthop J, Tungpradabkul S, et al. Plasmodium vivax parasites alter the balance of myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells and the induction of regulatory T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38:2697–705.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. DiLillo DJ, Matsushita T, Tedder TF. B10 cells and regulatory B cells balance immune responses during inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1183:38–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ntumngia FB, Adams JH. Design and immunogenicity of a novel synthetic antigen based on the ligand domain of the Plasmodium vivax duffy binding protein. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:30–6.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodrigues MH, Rodrigues KM, Oliveira TR, Comodo AN, Rodrigues MM, Kocken CH, et al. Antibody response of naturally infected individuals to recombinant Plasmodium vivax apical membrane antigen-1. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:185–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Valderrama-Aguirre A, Quintero G, Gomez A, Castellanos A, Perez Y, Mendez F, et al. Antigenicity, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of Plasmodium vivax MSP1 PV200l: a potential malaria vaccine subunit. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:16–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nebie I, Diarra A, Ouedraogo A, Tiono AB, Konate AT, Gansane A, et al. Humoral and cell-mediated immunity to MSP3 peptides in adults immunized with MSP3 in malaria endemic area, Burkina Faso. Parasite Immunol. 2009;31:474–80.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Riley EM, Morris-Jones S, Blackman MJ, Greenwood BM, Holder AA. A longitudinal study of naturally acquired cellular and humoral immune responses to a merozoite surface protein (MSP1) of Plasmodium falciparum in an area of seasonal malaria transmission. Parasite Immunol. 1993;15:513–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Changrob et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement