Open Access

Mosquito age and avian malaria infection

Malaria Journal201514:383

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0912-z

Received: 6 July 2015

Accepted: 25 September 2015

Published: 30 September 2015

Abstract

Background

The immune system of many insects wanes dramatically with age, leading to the general prediction that older insects should be more susceptible to infection than their younger counterparts. This prediction is however challenged by numerous studies showing that older insects are more resistant to a range of pathogens. The effect of age on susceptibility to infections is particularly relevant for mosquitoes given their role as vectors of malaria and other diseases. Despite this, the effect of mosquito age on Plasmodium susceptibility has been rarely explored, either experimentally or theoretically.

Methods

Experiments were carried out using the avian malaria parasite Plasmodium relictum and its natural vector in the field, the mosquito Culex pipiens. Both innate immune responses (number and type of circulating haemocytes) and Plasmodium susceptibility (prevalence and burden) were quantified in seven- and 17-day old females. Whether immunity or Plasmodium susceptibility are modulated by the previous blood feeding history of the mosquito was also investigated. To ensure repeatability, two different experimental blocks were carried out several weeks apart.

Results

Haemocyte numbers decrease drastically as the mosquitoes age. Despite this, older mosquitoes are significantly more resistant to a Plasmodium infection than their younger counterparts. Crucially, however, the age effect is entirely reversed when old mosquitoes have taken one previous non-infected blood meal.

Conclusions

The results agree with previous studies showing that older insects are often more resistant to infections than younger ones. These results suggest that structural and functional alterations in mosquito physiology with age may be more important than immunity in determining the probability of a Plasmodium infection in old mosquitoes. Possible explanations for why the effect is reversed in blood-fed mosquitoes are discussed. The reversal of the age effect in blood fed mosquitoes implies that age is unlikely to have a significant impact on mosquito susceptibility in the field.

Keywords

Immune senescence Ecological immunity Culex Avian malaria Haemocyte

Background

Ever since Manson [1] and Ross [2] demonstrated over a century ago that some of the key human diseases are not transmitted through contaminated air or water, but through the bite of infected mosquitoes, a great deal of effort has been invested in identifying the genetic and environmental determinants of mosquito competence for these parasites. Mosquito immunity has taken centre stage in these efforts. Laboratory gene silencing studies have provided key insights into immune pathways that limit the prevalence and intensity of parasitic infections in mosquitoes [35]. More recently, the bourgeoning field of ecological immunology has shifted the attention to the causes and consequences of variation in immune function in insects and, in particular, to the role played by non-genetic factors such as temperature [6], nutrition [7], reproductive status [8, 9], and previous infectious history [10, 11].

One of the best documented sources of heterogeneity in the immune system of multicellular organisms is their age. In virtually all species, immune function decreases drastically with age, a process that has been termed immune senescence and for which both mechanistic and evolutionary explanations have been proposed [12, 13]. Insects are no exception to this rule. Significant decreases in the antibacterial activity, melanization potential and number of haemocytes with age have been reported in a range of widely different insect taxa, including bees [1416], butterflies [17, 18], scorpionflies [19], crickets [20], damselflies [21], flies [22, 23], and also mosquitoes [2227].

The ubiquity of immune senescence leads to the general prediction that older insects should be more susceptible to infection than their younger counterparts, i.e., that individuals exposed to parasites later in life should have a higher probability and/or intensity of infection. This prediction has been confirmed in some cases, but not in others. Hillyer et al. [25] and Roberts and Hughes [28] both found that, as expected, a decrease in immunity with age is associated with an increase in parasite susceptibility. Surprisingly, however, in many insect species individuals seem to become more resistant to parasites as they age (see Additional file 1). Unfortunately, however, few of these studies have concomitantly measured immune function and parasite susceptibility, so the potential role played by the immune system cannot be established.

Understanding the effects of mosquito age on parasite transmission is particularly relevant for malaria. Early on, MacDonald [29] used mathematical epidemiology to show that vector lifespan is one of the most important determinants of malaria transmission. Indeed, the time lag between adult emergence and the activation of the host-seeking behaviour [30] combined with the long extrinsic incubation period of Plasmodium (approximately 14 days), entail that infectious mosquitoes are, necessarily, old. Consequently, old mosquitoes are often considered to be epidemiologically more important vectors of malaria than their younger counterparts. The age structure of the mosquito population also has important applied implications because it has been suggested that effective malaria control, with only weak selection for insecticide resistance, could be achieved by using insecticides that target only old mosquitoes [31, 32]. Yet, aside from a few studies that have shown that age-dependent mortality could affect malaria epidemiology [3335], most epidemiological models of malaria do not take age structure explicitly into account [36]. Specifically, the potential for age-dependent susceptibility to Plasmodium in mosquitoes has been largely overlooked. Yet, early studies showed that Aedes aegypti mosquitoes become less susceptible to a Plasmodium gallinaceum infection as they age [37]. This effect challenges the claim that old females are more important vectors of Plasmodium and could have far reaching consequences for malaria transmission. Further experimental studies monitoring the effects of mosquito age on immunity and susceptibility to Plasmodium parasites are therefore required to evaluate the importance of mosquito age-structure on malaria epidemiology.

Here, the effect of age on both mosquito immunity and susceptibility to a Plasmodium infection are quantified using an experimental system consisting on the avian malaria parasite Plasmodium relictum and its natural vector in the field, the mosquito Culex pipiens. This parasite is ubiquitous in natural populations of birds [38] and is known to incur an important fecundity cost on their vectors [39]. The aim of this study is three-fold. First to establish the existence of immune senescence in Cx pipiens by quantifying the number of circulating haemocytes in the haemolymph of three, seven and 17-day old mosquitoes. Haemocytes are a crucial component of the mosquito immune system that kill pathogens via phagocytic, lytic and melanization pathways [40] and play a key role in the defence against Plasmodium [41], although the precise relationship between haemocyte density and Plasmodium protection has not been established, and may not necessarily be linear. Second, to establish whether changes in haemocyte numbers with age are associated with changes in the susceptibility to a Plasmodium infection: are old mosquitoes more or less susceptible to a Plasmodium infection? And third, to establish whether the effect of age on either the immune function or parasite susceptibility is modulated by the previous blood feeding history of the mosquitoes. Indeed, in practice, old mosquitoes are likely to have taken at least one previous uninfected blood meal. Previous blood meals drastically alter the physiology of the mosquitoes [42] and could potentially reset the effect of age on susceptibility to malaria [37, 43].

Methods

Plasmodium strain and bird infections

Plasmodium relictum (lineage SGS1) is the aetiological agent of the most prevalent form of avian malaria in Europe [44]. The biology of avian malaria is similar to that of human malaria, both in the vertebrate host and in the mosquito, which is why avian malaria has historically played a key role in human malaria research [45]. The lineage was isolated from infected sparrows in 2009 [45] and passaged to naïve canaries (Serinus canaria). Since then it has been maintained by carrying out regular passages between the stock canaries through intraperitoneal injections. Experimental canaries (n = 5) were infected by injecting them with ca. 80 µL of blood from the infected canary stock. Mosquito blood feeding took place 12 days after the injection, to coincide with the acute phase of the Plasmodium infection [46].

Oocyst prevalence and burden

Experiments were carried out using a laboratory line of Cx pipiens (SLAB, [46]). The experimental design is shown in Fig. 1. To test the effect of mosquito age on the probability and intensity of a Plasmodium infection, two mosquito cohorts were generated: ‘old’ (17-day old) mosquitoes (which was later split between ‘blood fed’ and ‘unfed’, see below) and ‘young’ (7-day old) mosquitoes. The larvae for both of these cohorts were raised in an identical way following previously published protocols [46]. Larval trays (n = 6 for the young and n = 10 for the old cohorts) were placed individually inside an ‘emergence cage’ (40 × 28 × 31 cm) and emerged adults were allowed to feed ad libitum on a 10 % glucose water solution.
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the experimental design. Black bird uninfected blood meal; red birds Plasmodium-infected blood meal; h3, h7, h17: haemolymph sampling from 3, 7 and 17-day old mosquitoes, respectively. Haemolymph was sampled immediately before the blood meal on a separate sample of mosquitoes (haemocyte extraction is destructive). Young, old-unfed and old-blood fed mosquitoes are colour marked and fed from the same bird (n = 5 different birds)

The experiment proceeded as follows. For the old cohort, on the day of emergence (Day 0, Fig. 1) mosquitoes were haphazardly sampled from the emergence cages (c.a. 20 mosquitoes from each emergence cage) and placed in six different experimental cages. Seven days later (Day 7) the cages were randomly allocated to either the ‘old-unfed’ treatment or the ‘old-blood fed’ treatment, and the latter were provided with an uninfected canary to blood feed (a different canary per cage) following previously published protocols [46]. Blood feeding success was confirmed through the visual inspection of the mosquito abdomen. Unfed mosquitoes (<7 %) were discarded. The young cohort was launched 10 days after the old cohort (Day 10, Fig. 1) in an identical way. All mosquitoes were given a Plasmodium-infected blood meal on Day 17. For this purpose, 50 mosquitoes from each of the three experimental treatments (young, old-unfed, old-blood fed) were placed together inside a cage (n = 5 different cages) and allowed to blood feed from a Plasmodium-infected bird for 12 h. To distinguish between the three treatments, mosquitoes were previously marked using three different fluorescent colour powders and the colour allocated to each treatment changed in each of the cages (for details, see [47]).

To obtain an estimate of blood meal size, 1 day after the infected blood meal, all blood-engorged females were placed individually in numbered plastic tubes (30 ml) covered with a mesh. Food was provided in the form of a cotton pad soaked in a 10 % glucose solution. Seven days later (Day 7 post-blood meal) the females were taken out of the tubes and amount of haematin excreted at the bottom of each tube was quantified as an estimate of the blood meal size [46]. Females were then dissected and the number of Plasmodium oocysts in their midguts counted with the aid of a binocular microscope [46]. The wings of ten haphazardly chosen females from each size and treatment combination were removed prior to the midgut dissection and measured along its longest axis as an index of body size.

As the young and old cohorts are not launched simultaneously, there is a risk is that small differences in the larval rearing conditions may result in adults that varied in their body condition independently of their age, thereby potentially confounding the results. To account for this, the entire experiment was repeated 4 months later (the experiments are hereafter called Blocks 1 and 2).

Haemolymph collection and haemocyte quantification

To establish whether the patterns of oocyst prevalence and burden in old and young mosquitoes are correlated with their immune activity, a sub-sample of ten to 15 mosquitoes from each cage and treatment combination was taken at regular intervals throughout the experiment and their haemolymph extracted to count the number of circulating haemocytes. The soft exoskeleton of newly emerged mosquitoes made the task of sampling the haemolymph on the day of emergence impossible. Old and young mosquitoes were therefore sampled 3 days after emergence (once their exoskeleton had hardened) and immediately before each of the blood meals: on Days 7 (old mosquitoes only) and 17 (old and young mosquitoes) of the experiment (see Fig. 1). The wing of haphazardly sampled females from each cages were measured as above to control for body size, and haemolymph were extracted individually following the protocols described below.

The haemolymph collection protocol was adapted from one described by Qayum and Telang [48]. Mosquitoes were injected between the seventh and eighth abdominal segments with an anticoagulant solution (70 % Schneider’s Insect medium and 30 % citrate buffer) and placed on ice for 5 min to allow the anticoagulant solution to dislodge haemocytes adhering to the internal tissues. The tip of the abdomen was then removed and, using a Hamilton™ syringe, 10 µL of anticoagulant buffer was injected in the lateral side of mosquito mesothorax. This caused the diluted haemolymph to flow out of the abdomen. Eight microlitre of diluted haemolymph were collected with a pipette equipped with a sterile tip and placed on a glass slide. Slides were placed in the dark for 20 min to allow the haemocytes to adhere to the slide’s surface. The haemocytes were then fixed and stained using the Microscopy Hemacolor® staining kit as follows. Each glass slide was dipped five times for 1 s in the fixative solution, then three times for 1 s in both the solution I and in the solution II. Finally the glass slide was rinsed one time for 1 s in the solution III. Haemocytes were counted under the optical microscope (40× objective). The technique was repeated in an identical way in both experimental blocks. In Block 2, however, due to a problem with a one of the batches of the anticoagulant solution, the number of haemocytes in the young cohort could not be quantified.

Haemocytes were classified based on their morphological appearance into granulocytes, easily distinguishable by their ability to spread on glass surfaces, and oenocytoids, characterized by their spherical shape (see Additional file 2). According to Hillyer et al. [25] these are the only two types of circulating haemocytes capable of adhering to glass slides. A third population of haemocytes called prohaemocytes has also been identified in some studies [40]. Prohaemocytes are morphologically similar to oenocytoids, only smaller. In addition, their origin and functional role are still under discussion: they may be multipotent stem cells that give rise to the other haemocyte types [26] or may arise through the asymmetrical division of granulocytes [49]. As these prohaemocytes may constitute a very small fraction of the total number of circulating haemocytes [40] and since no clear size threshold existed to confidently distinguish between oenocytoids and prohaemocytes, no such distinction was made. It is thus worth bearing in mind that the population referred to as being oenocytoids may have included a small fraction of prohaemocytes.

Statistical analyses

Analyses were carried out using the R statistical package (v. 3.1.1). The different statistical models built to analyse the data are described in Additional file 3. The analysis of response variables, which may depend on which bird the mosquitoes fed on, such oocyst prevalence and oocyst burden was carried out using mixed model procedures, fitting bird as a random factor in the models and treatment (young, old-unfed, old-blood fed) and blood meal size (haematin) as fixed factors. Oocyst prevalence (presence/absence of oocysts) was analysed using the lmer mixed model procedure and binomial errors, while oocyst burden (number of oocysts in individuals with more than one oocyst) was normalized using a logarithmic transformation and analysed using the lme procedure. All other variables were analysed using standard general linear models (glm) with an appropriate error distribution: wing size and haemocyte counts were analysed with a normal error distribution.

Maximal models, including all higher order interactions, were simplified by sequentially eliminating non-significant terms and interactions to establish a minimal model [50]. The significance of the explanatory variables was established using either a likelihood ratio test (which is approximately distributed as a Chi square distribution [51]) or an F test. The significant Chi square or F values given in the text are for the minimal model, whereas non-significant values correspond to those obtained before the deletion of the variable from the model. A posteriori contrasts were carried out by aggregating factor levels together and by testing the fit of the simplified model using a likelihood-ratio test [50].

Ethical statement

Animal experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the National Charter on the Ethics of Animal Experimentation of the French Government, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. Experiments were approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation established by the authors’ institution (CNRS) under the auspices of the French Ministry of Education and Research (permit number CEEA- LR-1051).

Results

Haemocyte density

As there were no significant differences in size between the females in the different treatments (treatment effect, Block 1: model 5: F1,73 = 0.066, p = 0.417, Block 2: model 19: F1,37 = 0.089, p = 0.328), female size was not included in subsequent analyses. In Block 1, the old mosquito cohort was analysed to establish whether granulocytes, oenocytoids or the total haemocyte counts change with time. For this purpose, differences between old-unfed and old-blood fed females on Day 17 were first tested. As neither total haemocyte (model 6: F1,19 = 0.819 p = 0.377), granulocyte (model 9: F1,19 = 0.1582 p = 0.224) or oenocytoid numbers (model 12: F1,19 = 0.002 p = 0.999) differed between blood fed and unfed individuals (Fig. 2), the effect of time within the old mosquito cohort on these variables was carried out pooling these two data points together. This analysis showed that time has a significant effect on the total number of haemocytes (model 7: F2,47 = 8.007 p = 0.001, Fig. 2a) and oenocytoids (model 13: F2,47 = 20.820 p < 0.0001, Fig. 2c), but not on the number of granulocytes (model 10: F2,47 = 1.320 p = 0.277, Fig. 2b). While total haemocytes and oenocytoids remained stable at around 586 ± 25 and 325 ± 26 cells, respectively, between Days 3 and 7, their numbers decreased by ~40 % thereafter (contrast analyses Day 7 vs 17, total haemocytes: F1,48 = 13.793 p < 0.001, oenocytoids: F1,48 = 34.755 p < 0.0001). These analyses also revealed no significant effects of either treatment or time on the number of either total haemocytes, granulocytes or oenocytoids between the old and young females on Days 3 and 7, the time points shared by the two cohorts (interaction treatment × time effect, total haemocytes: model 8: F2,50 = 3.119, p = 0.083, granulocytes: model 11: F2,50 = 0.003, p = 0.956, oenocytoids: model 14: F2,50 = 0.034, p = 0.854, Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Haemocyte counts in the haemolymph of young (grey lines) and old (blue lines) mosquito cohorts across the three different time points since emergence in Block 1 (a, b, c) and Block 2 (d, e, f) of the experiment. Half of the mosquitoes in the old cohort were blood fed on Day 7 (see Fig. 1). Blood-fed females are represented by a dashed line, unfed females by a full line (when dashed and full lines overlap only the latter is shown). Total haemocytes (a, d) are the sum of the total number of granulocytes (b, e) and oenocytoids (c, f). Due to a problem with an anticoagulant solution, in Block 2 only the haemocytes of old-unfed and old-fed mosquitoes could be quantified

The results of Block 2 for the old-unfed and old-fed treatments (the haemocyte quantification for the young treatment could not be carried out due to a problem with one of the anticoagulant batches, see above) were highly consistent with those obtained in Block 1 (Fig. 2). As above, neither total haemocyte (model 20: F1,16 = 0.470, p = 0.503), granulocyte (model 22: F1,16 = 0.2284, p = 0.639) or oenocytoid numbers (model 24: F1,16 = 1.354, p = 0.262) differed between blood fed and unfed individuals so the data were pooled for subsequent analyses. Time has a significant effect on the total number of haemocytes (model 21: F2,36 = 6.891, p = 0.003, Fig. 2d) and oenocytoids (model 25: F2,36 = 17.716, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2f), but not on the number of granulocytes (model 23: F2,36 = 1.191, p = 0.315, Fig. 2e).

Plasmodium prevalence and intensity

As there were no differences in size between the females in the three different treatments (treatment effect Block 1, model 1: χ 2 2  = 2.848, p = 0.609; Block 2, model 11: χ 2 2  = 2.881, p = 0.0747), female size was not included in subsequent analyses. The amount of blood ingested, however, varied significantly between the treatments (Block 1, model 2: χ 5 2  = 7.6836, p < 0.0001; Block 2, model 16: χ 5 2  = 41.851, p < 0.0001): young females took significantly larger blood meals than old-unfed (contrast analyses: Block 1: χ 4 2  = 14.988, p < 0.0001, Block 2: χ 4 2  = 69.009, p < 0.0001) and old-fed females (Block 1: χ 4 2  = 3.221, p = 0.073, Block 2: model 13: χ 4 2  = 32.622, p < 0.0001). Old-fed females also took larger blood meals than old-unfed ones (Block 1: χ 4 2  = 4.866, p = 0.027, Block 2: χ 4 2  = 13.106, p < 0.0001). As blood meal size can be a strong predictor of both the prevalence and the intensity of the infection, this explanatory variable was introduced into all subsequent analyses.

The results of Blocks 1 and 2 are highly consistent in showing a strong effect of female age on the probability of becoming infected by Plasmodium (treatment effect Block 1, model 3: χ 5 2  = 13.08, p = 0.001; Block 2, model 17: χ 5 2  = 21.123, p < 0.001, Fig. 3a, b). In both blocks, the probability of infection of old females was a roughly a third lower than that of young females (contrast analyses young vs old-unfed Block 1: χ 4 2  = 9.433, p = 0.002; Block 2: χ 4 2  = 22.561, p < 0.001). However, taking an uninfected blood meal 10 days before the infected one reverses the protective effects of age so that the prevalence of infection in old-blood fed females was no different to that of young females (contrast analyses Block 1: χ 4 2  = 0.071, p = 0.790, Block 2 : χ 4 2  = 0.023, p = 0.880, Fig. 3a, b). Including haematin in the analyses did not alter the significance of these results.
Fig. 3

Infection prevalence (% mosquitoes containing ≥1 oocyst) in young (7-day old mosquitoes) and in old (17-day old) mosquitoes that were either allowed a previous uninfected blood meal (old-blood fed) or not. Figure represents results for Block 1 (a) and Block 2 (b)

A similar trend was observed in the intensity of the infection: old-unfed females have roughly three times fewer oocyst burdens than young and old-blood fed ones, although the results are only statistically significant in the second experimental block (treatment effect Block 2, model 18: χ 2 2  = 14.405, p < 0.001, Fig. 4b). Including haematin in the analyses did not alter the significance of these results. Block 1 followed a similar trend, with lower oocyst burdens in old-unfed females than in the other two treatments, but the results were not statistically significant (treatment effect Block 1, model 11: χ 2 2  = 3.607, p = 0.165, Fig. 4a). Here, however, a significant positive correlation between haematin and oocyst burden was found (haematin effect, model 11: χ 4 2  = 18.515, p < 0.001).
Fig. 4

Mean oocyst burden (NB oocysts across mosquitoes containing ≥1 oocyst) in young (7-day old mosquitoes) and in old (17-day old) mosquitoes that were either allowed a previous uninfected blood meal (old-blood fed) or not. Figure represents results for Block 1 (a) and Block 2 (b)

Discussion

The results of these experiments show that: (1) haemocyte numbers decrease drastically as mosquitoes’ age; (2) this effect is not correlated with an increased susceptibility to Plasmodium, rather, older mosquitoes are significantly more resistant to malaria parasites than their younger counterparts; and, (3) the increased resistance with age is reversed when mosquitoes have previously taken an uninfected blood meal. Below each of these results separately are discussed separately.

Immunity wanes with age

Immune defences tend to decline as individuals age. This decline may be the result of the generalized, and inevitable, process of physiological wear and tear, or an adaptive adjustment of immune function with age [12, 16]. Age-related declines in immune function have been documented in several insect species using a variety of immune indicators, such as phenoloxidase (PO) activity, encapsulation rate and haemocyte numbers [25, 52]. The results of the current experiments show that 17-day old Cx pipiens mosquitoes have 40 % fewer haemocytes than their younger (7-day old) counterparts. Interestingly, this decline in haemocytes with time is entirely due to a drastic decrease in the number of oenocytoids, while granulocytes remain largely unchanged. Granulocytes and oenocytoids play different roles in the immune system. Granulocytes primarily kill pathogens through phagocytosis or lysis, while oenocytoids are the major producers of the enzymes required for melanization, including PO [40]. The drastic decrease in oenocytoids observed agrees with previous results showing that PO activity declines drastically with age so that, by Day 14, Cx pipiens females have lost around two-thirds of their PO at emergence [27]. Immune decay with age has also been observed in the two other major mosquito vector species, Ae. aegypti and Anopheles gambiae, where decreases in haemocyte numbers [25, 26] and melanization potential [23, 24] have been documented. Taking a previous blood meal did not alter the course of immune senescence in mosquitoes. Previous work has shown that blood feeding activates the mosquito innate immune system [26, 53, 54]. The effect is however transient, which probably explains why no differences in mosquitoes were found 10 days after the uninfected blood meal.

Susceptibility to Plasmodium decreases with age

Immune decay has led to predictions that as insects age their ability to clear infections should also decrease [55, 56]. The results of the current experiments contradict this prediction. Despite a drastic decrease in the immune system with age, old Cx pipiens females are significantly more resistant to a P. relictum infection than younger ones. The probability of becoming infected by P. relictum is 30 % lower in 17-day old than in seven-day old mosquitoes. These results are consistent across two different experimental blocks carried out several weeks apart under identical experimental conditions. Two other studies to date have investigated the role of mosquito age on Plasmodium infection. Terzian et al. [37], who carried out what is probably the first investigation into the effect of insect age on susceptibility to infection in any invertebrate, also reported that as Ae. aegypti age they become more resistant to a P. gallinaceum infection. More recently, however, Okech et al. [57] found no effect of age on the prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum infections in An. gambiae, although the low infection rates in these experiments (<4 % of the membrane-fed mosquitoes became infected) may have significantly reduced the statistical power of their experiments.

Interestingly, a decrease in the probability of infection with age seems to be a common feature in insects (see Additional file 1). It has been reported in bacteria-challenged drosophila flies [58], Trypanosoma-challenged tsetse flies [59], Microsporidium-challenged bees [60, 61] and virus and Filaria-challenged mosquitoes [43, 62, 63]. The mechanisms underlying these increased susceptibilities to infection later in life are not known, but none of these studies measured immunity, so a re-allocation of resources towards a particular arm of the immune system cannot be entirely excluded [16]. Unfortunately, only a handful of studies have concomitantly measured immunity and parasite infection rates in aging insects. Hillyer et al. [25] found that a decrease in haemocyte counts with age increases the susceptibility of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes to injected Escherischia coli bacteria. Similarly, Roberts and Hughes [28] found that a decrease in PO level in older bumblebees was associated with increased microsporidian infection rates. Clearly, more studies are needed that investigate the effect of age not only on immunity but also on parasite infection rates since, as the results presented here show, both are not necessarily correlated.

The fact that a decrease in PO [27] and PO-producing oenocytoids (Fig. 2) does not result in an increase in Plasmodium infection rates could be partly explained by PO playing no role in Plasmodium protection in this system. Current knowledge of the role of PO in Plasmodium protection is largely based on studies using genetically selected resistant and susceptible mosquitoes and gene-silencing procedures [3] but there is hardly any evidence that melanization plays a role in defence against Plasmodium in the field (e.g., [24]), and P. relictum oocysts in Cx pipiens mosquitoes are rare. Melanization, however, is the most apparent, but not the only, outcome of the PO cascade. The PO enzymatic cascade also produces many cytotoxic intermediates that generate reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates [64] which may kill the parasite without encapsulating it [65]. Alternatively, the possibility that the decrease in haemocyte counts and PO activity with age in Cx pipiens mosquitoes is correlated with the upregulation of another unmeasured, immune effector, cannot be entirely excluded. Potential candidates are antimicrobial peptides, which are produced by the mosquito fat body [25] so their titers may be uncorrelated with haemocyte densities [16]. Indeed, Moret and Schmid-Hempel [16] found that, as bumblebees age, a decrease in haemocyte numbers and PO activity was associated with an increase in antimicrobial activity. However, Lambrechts et al. [66] however, found a positive correlation between PO activity and antibacterial defence. In addition, previous results showing that insecticide-resistant Cx pipiens mosquitoes show no differences in P. relictum prevalence or intensity, despite having significantly higher levels of antimicrobial peptide expression [46, 67], suggest that these peptides may not play a key role in Plasmodium defence in this system. It is thus highly likely that immunity is not directly responsible for the lower infection rates observed in old mosquitoes and that an explanation must therefore be found elsewhere.

The journey of Plasmodium through the mosquito requires the complex interplay of a suite of finely tuned physiological, immunological and molecular events, many of which take place in the mosquito midgut [68, 69]. In recent years, the role played by the different arms of the mosquito immune system in limiting Plasmodium development has received a great deal of attention (recently reviewed by Clayton et al. [3]). Fewer efforts have been directed at investigating how other physiological events, which are essential for the successful transformation and passage of the different Plasmodium stages through the mosquito, vary across individuals and experimental conditions. Most of these events take place in the mosquito midgut and include: the production of large amounts of xanthurenic acid, a by-product of the synthesis of the eye pigment, which is essential for the exflagellation of gametocytes in the midgut [70], the secretion of digestive trypsin-like enzymes which aid ookinetes to break down and traverse the chitinous peritrophic membrane [71], the binding of ookinetes to specific midgut epithelial ligands [69] and to structural proteins in the basal lamina [72], and the secretion of digestive carboxypeptidase enzymes which may provide Plasmodium with essential amino acids for oocyst development [68]. It is likely that some of these factors are disturbed as mosquitoes age. Recent work has indeed shown that in Drosophila, ageing is accompanied by both a structural and a functional degeneration of the fly’s midgut [73]. In particular, a decrease in trypsin production with age has been observed not only in Drosophila [73], but also in Anopheles [74]. Equivalent changes in the Culex midgut could explain the decrease in Plasmodium infection with age observed in this system. In addition, recent work has demonstrated the crucial role played by the midgut microbial flora in the success of Plasmodium infections in mosquitoes [7577]. In flies, the number of micro-organisms found in the lumen of the gut increases significantly with age [78]. Further work is needed on how the gut microbiota changes as mosquito ages and on the consequences this may have for Plasmodium transmission.

A prior blood meal reverses the effect of age on Plasmodium susceptibility

The fact that the age effect is reversed when old mosquitoes have taken one previous non-infected blood meal is significant and may provide further clues about the mechanisms underlying the effect of mosquito age on infection. Interestingly, Terzian [37] and Ariani et al. [43] also found that a previous blood meal reverses the negative effect of age on the development of two very different parasites: Plasmodium and the filarial nematode Brugia malayi, respectively. Both speculated that a long stretch without a blood meal may have depleted the older females of key nutrients required for parasite development, and that the additional blood meal may have provided the extra resources. Terzian et al. [37] explored the possibility that nitrogen or protein depletion were responsible for their results by substituting the first blood meal with a diet of chicken plasma and haemoglobin. Puzzlingly, this diet resulted in an even larger decrease in Plasmodium oocyst numbers than in sugar-fed mosquitoes. Complementing the diet with a raisin infusion did, however, restore oocyst numbers to those obtained in younger mosquitoes [37]. Clearly, more work is needed on the nutritional needs of Plasmodium inside the mosquito and on whether key limiting nutrients for Plasmodium development are acquired by the mosquito during their adult or larval lives [79].

Aside from their nutritional contents, blood meals also trigger a whole set of physiological events in the mosquito, which could impact the infection success of a subsequent infected blood meal. Taking a warm blood meal induces a temperature stress that results in the synthesis of hsp70 [80], a heat shock protein that has been shown to lead to drastic increases in oocyst burdens in Plasmodium-infected Anopheles [81]. In addition, ingestion of a first blood meal may alter the kinetics of digestion of subsequent blood meals [82]. In An. gambiae, ingestion of a prior blood meal accelerates the digestive process of subsequent infected blood meals, thereby reducing the probability of a Plasmodium infection [82], while in Ae. aegypti, subsequent digestions are slowed down [83]. Because parasite fertilization, transformation and penetration through the midgut require time, a slower blood meal digestion in previously blood-fed Cx pipiens females would have afforded the parasite more time to establish a successful infection in the mosquito [82].

Conclusion

Mosquito populations are structured both by age and by the time since they took their infectious blood meal [35]. The results of these experiments show that age significantly impacts the susceptibility of mosquitoes to a Plasmodium infection: older females have a lower probability of becoming infected with the parasite. However, the dramatic effects of age are reversed in previously blood-fed females. This point is crucial because most old mosquitoes in the field are likely to have taken at least one previous blood meal. Indeed, up to 80 % of malaria vectors collected in the field are parous: i.e., have taken a blood meal and laid a batch of eggs (e.g., [84, 85]). As a consequence, in the field, age is unlikely to have a significant impact on the susceptibility of mosquitoes to a malaria infection. However, investigating the mechanisms underlying both the increased resistance of old unfed mosquitoes, and its reversal when mosquitoes are previously given blood meal, may unravel key insights about the biology and development of Plasmodium parasites in the mosquito.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

RP, SG and AR conceived and designed the experiments. RP and AN performed the experiments. RP analysed the data. RP, SG and AR wrote the paper. All authors read and commented on earlier drafts of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the EID-Mediterranée for allowing us the use of their insectaries for these experiments.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MIVEGEC, UMR CNRS
(2)
CEFE, UMR CNRS

References

  1. Manson P. On the development of Filaria sanguinis hominis, and on the mosquito considered as a nurse. J Linn Soc Lond Zool. 1878;14:304–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ross R: Researches on malaria. Nobel Lect. 1902;1–116.Google Scholar
  3. Clayton AM, Dong Y, Dimopoulos G. The Anopheles innate immune system in the defense against malaria infection. J Innate Immun. 2014;6:169–81.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Xi Z, Ramirez JL, Dimopoulos G. The Aedes aegypti toll pathway controls dengue virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000098.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Erickson SM, Xi Z, Mayhew GF, Ramirez JL, Aliota MT, Christensen BM, et al. Mosquito infection responses to developing filarial worms. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e529.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Murdock CC, Moller-Jacobs LL, Thomas MB. Complex environmental drivers of immunity and resistance in malaria mosquitoes. Proc Biol Sci. 2013;280:20132030.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Koella JC, Sørensen FL. Effect of adult nutrition on the melanization immune response of the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi. Med Vet Entomol. 2002;16:316–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shoemaker KL, Parsons NM, Adamo SA. Mating enhances parasite resistance in the cricket Gryllus texensis. Anim Behav. 2006;71:371–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Siva-Jothy MT, Tsubaki Y, Hooper RE. Decreased immune response as a proximate cost of copulation and oviposition in a damselfly. Physiol Entomol. 1998;23:274–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kurtz J, Franz K. Innate defence: evidence for memory in invertebrate immunity. Nature. 2003;425:37–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rodrigues J, Brayner FA, Alves LC, Dixit R, Barillas-Mury C. Hemocyte differentiation mediates innate immune memory in Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Science. 2010;329:1353–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell G. Evolutionary and nonevolutionary theories of senescence. Am Nat. 1984;124:600–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Shanley DP, Aw D, Manley NR, Palmer DB. An evolutionary perspective on the mechanisms of immunosenescence. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:374–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Doums C, Moret Y, Benelli E, Schmid-Hempel P. Senescence of immune defence in Bombus workers. Ecol Entomol. 2002;27:138–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilson-Rich N, Dres ST, Starks PT. The ontogeny of immunity: development of innate immune strength in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). J Insect Physiol. 2008;54:1392–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moret Y, Schmid-Hempel P. Immune responses of bumblebee workers as a function of individual and colony age: senescence versus plastic adjustment of the immune function. Oikos. 2009;118:371–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Stoehr AM. Inter- and intra-sexual variation in immune defence in the cabbage white butterfly, Pieris rapae L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Ecol Entomol. 2007;32:188–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Prasai K, Karlsson B. Variation in immune defence in relation to age in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi L.). J Invertebr Pathol. 2012;111:252–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kurtz J. Phagocytosis by invertebrate hemocytes: Causes of individual variation in Panorpa vulgaris scorpionflies. Microsc Res Tech. 2002;57:456–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Adamo SA, Jensen M, Younger M. Changes in lifetime immunocompetence in male and female Gryllus texensis (formerly G. integer): trade-offs between immunity and reproduction. Anim Behav. 2001;62:417–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Rolff J. Effects of age and gender on immune function of dragonflies (Odonata, Lestidae) from a wild population. Can J Zool. 2001;79:2176–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Li J, Tracy JW, Christensen BM. Relationship of hemolymph phenoloxidase and mosquito age in Aedes aegypti. J Invertebr Pathol. 1992;60:188–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chun J, Riehle M, Paskewitz SM. Effect of mosquito age and reproductive status on melanization of sephadex beads in Plasmodium-refractory and -susceptible strains of Anopheles gambiae. J Invertebr Pathol. 1995;66:11–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwartz A, Koella JC. Melanization of Plasmodium falciparum and C-25 sephadex beads by field-caught Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) from southern Tanzania. J Med Entomol. 2002;39:84–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillyer JF, Schmidt SL, Fuchs JF, Boyle JP, Christensen BM. Age-associated mortality in immune challenged mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti) correlates with a decrease in haemocyte numbers. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:39–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Castillo JC, Robertson AE, Strand MR. Characterization of hemocytes from the mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;36:891–903.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cornet S, Gandon S, Rivero A. Patterns of phenoloxidase activity in insecticide resistant and susceptible mosquitoes differ between laboratory-selected and wild-caught individuals. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:315.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberts KE, Hughes WOH. Immunosenescence and resistance to parasite infection in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Invertebr Pathol. 2014;121:1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. MacDonald G. The epidemiology and control of malaria. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1957.Google Scholar
  30. Clements AN: The biology of mosquitoes: development, nutrition, and reproduction. Chapman and Hall; 1992.Google Scholar
  31. Read AF, Lynch PA, Thomas MB. How to make evolution-proof insecticides for malaria control. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000058.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Koella JC, Lynch PA, Thomas MB, Read AF. Towards evolution-proof malaria control with insecticides. Evol Appl. 2009;2:469–80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Styer LM, Carey JR, Wang J-L, Scott TW. Mosquitoes do senesce: departure from the paradigm of constant mortality. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:111–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Arifin SMN, Zhou Y, Davis GJ, Gentile JE, Madey GR, Collins FH. An agent-based model of the population dynamics of Anopheles gambiae. Malar J. 2014;13:424.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rock KS, Wood DA, Keeling MJ. Age- and bite-structured models for vector-borne diseases. Epidemics. 2015;12:20–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Reiner RC, Perkins TA, Barker CM, Niu T, Chaves LF, Ellis AM, et al. A systematic review of mathematical models of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission: 1970–2010. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10:20120921.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Terzian LA, Stahler N, Irreverre F. The effects of aging, and the modifications of these effects, on the immunity of mosquitoes to malarial infection. J Immunol. 1956;76:308–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Fallon SM, Bermingham E, Ricklefs RE. Host specialization and geographiclocalization of avian malaria parasites: a regional analysis in the lesser Antilles. Am Nat. 2005;165:466–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pigeault R, Vézilier J, Nicot A, Gandon S, Rivero A. Transgenerational effect of infection in Plasmodium-infected mosquitoes. Biol Lett. 2015;11:20141025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hillyer JF, Strand MR. Mosquito hemocyte-mediated immune responses. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2014;3:14–21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramirez JL, Garver LS, Brayner FA, Alves LC, Rodrigues J, Molina-Cruz A, et al. The role of hemocytes in Anopheles gambiae antiplasmodial immunity. J Innate Immun. 2014;6:119–28.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Klowden MJ, Lea AO. “Physiologically old” mosquitoes are not necessarily old physiologically. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1980;29:1460–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ariani CV, Juneja P, Smith S, Tinsley MC, Jiggins FM. Vector competence of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes for filarial nematodes is affected by age and nutrient limitation. Exp Gerontol. 2015;61:47–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Valkiunas G: Avian malaria parasites and other haemosporidia. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Pigeault R, Vézilier J, Cornet S, Zélé F, Nicot A, Perret P, et al. Avian malaria: a new lease of life for an old experimental model to study the evolutionary ecology of Plasmodium. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2015;370:20140300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Vézilier J, Nicot A, Gandon S, Rivero A. Insecticide resistance and malaria transmission: infection rate and oocyst burden in Culex pipiens mosquitoes infected with Plasmodium relictum. Malar J. 2010;9:379.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Vézilier J, Nicot A, Gandon S, Rivero A. Plasmodium infection decreases fecundity and increases survival of mosquitoes. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2012;279:4033–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Qayum AA, Telang A: A protocol for collecting and staining hemocytes from the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Vis Exp JoVE 2011;51:e2772.Google Scholar
  49. King JG, Hillyer JF. Spatial and temporal in vivo analysis of circulating and sessile immune cells in mosquitoes: hemocyte mitosis following infection. BMC Biol. 2013;11:55.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Crawley MJ. The R Book. John Wiley and Sons; 2012.Google Scholar
  51. Bolker BM: Ecological models and data in R. Princeton University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  52. Sicard M, Chevalier F, Vlechouver M, Bouchon D, Grève P, Braquart-Varnier C. Variations of immune parameters in terrestrial isopods: a matter of gender, aging and Wolbachia. Naturwissenschaften. 2010;97:819–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Castillo J, Brown MR, Strand MR. Blood feeding and insulin-like peptide 3 stimulate proliferation of hemocytes in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002274.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Bryant WB, Michel K. Blood feeding induces hemocyte proliferation and activation in the African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae Giles. J Exp Biol. 2014;217:1238–45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zerofsky M, Harel E, Silverman N, Tatar M. Aging of the innate immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. Aging Cell. 2005;4:103–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Mackenzie DK, Bussière LF, Tinsley MC. Senescence of the cellular immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. Exp Gerontol. 2011;46:853–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Okech BA, Gouagna LC, Kabiru EW, Beier JC, Yan G, Githure JI. Influence of age and previous diet of Anopheles gambiae on the infectivity of natural Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes from human volunteers. J Insect Sci. 2004;4:33.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Khan I, Prasad NG. The aging of the immune response in Drosophila melanogaster. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68:129–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Walshe DP, Lehane MJ, Haines LR. Post eclosion age predicts the prevalence of midgut trypanosome infections in Glossina. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26984.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Chaimanee V, Chantawannakul P, Chen Y, Evans JD, Pettis JS. Effects of host age on susceptibility to infection and immune gene expression in honey bee queens (Apis mellifera) inoculated with Nosema ceranae. Apidologie. 2013;45:451–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Rutrecht ST, Klee J, Brown MJF. Horizontal transmission success of Nosema bombi to its adult bumble bee hosts: effects of dosage, spore source and host age. Parasitology. 2007;134:1719–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Baqar S, Hayes CG, Ahmed T. The effect of larval rearing conditions and adult age on the susceptibility of Culex tritaeniorhynchus to infection with West Nile virus. Mosq News. 1980;40:165–71.Google Scholar
  63. Richards SL, Lord CC, Pesko KN, Tabachnick WJ. Environmental and biological factors influencing Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) vector competence for West Nile Virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:126–34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Nappi AJ, Christensen BM. Melanogenesis and associated cytotoxic reactions: applications to insect innate immunity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;35:443–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhao P, Lu Z, Strand MR, Jiang H. Antiviral, antiparasitic, and cytotoxic effects of 5,6-dihydroxyindole (DHI), a reactive compound generated by phenoloxidase during insect immune response. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;41:645–52.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Lambrechts L, Vulule JM, Koella JC. Genetic correlation between melanization and antibacterial immune responses in a natural population of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Evol Int J Org Evol. 2004;58:2377–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Vézilier J, Nicot A, Lorgeril J, Gandon S, Rivero A. The impact of insecticide resistance on Culex pipiens immunity. Evol Appl. 2013;6:497–509.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Lavazec C, Bourgouin C. Mosquito-based transmission blocking vaccines for interrupting Plasmodium development. Microbes Infect. 2008;10:845–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Sinden RE. The cell biology of malaria infection of mosquito: advances and opportunities. Cell Microbiol. 2015;17:451–66.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Billker O, Lindo V, Panico M, Etienne AE, Paxton T, Dell A, et al. Identification of xanthurenic acid as the putative inducer of malaria development in the mosquito. Nature. 1998;392:289–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Shahabuddin M, Cociancich S, Zieler H. The search for novel malaria transmission-blocking targets in the mosquito midgut. Parasitol Today. 1998;14:493–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Crawford JE, Rottschaefer SM, Coulibaly B, Sacko M, Niaré O, Riehle MM, et al. No evidence for positive selection at two potential targets for malaria transmission-blocking vaccines in Anopheles gambiae s.s. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;16:87–92.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Jasper H. Exploring the physiology and pathology of aging in the intestine of Drosophila melanogaster. Invertebr Reprod Dev. 2015;59:51–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Lemos FJ, Cornel AJ, Jacobs-Lorena M. Trypsin and aminopeptidase gene expression is affected by age and food composition in Anopheles gambiae. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1996;26:651–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Dong Y, Manfredini F, Dimopoulos G. Implication of the mosquito midgut microbiota in the defense against malaria parasites. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000423.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Cirimotich CM, Dong Y, Clayton AM, Sandiford SL, Souza-Neto JA, Mulenga M, et al. Natural microbe-mediated refractoriness to Plasmodium Infection in Anopheles gambiae. Science. 2011;332:855–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Boissière A, Tchioffo MT, Bachar D, Abate L, Marie A, Nsango SE, et al. Midgut microbiota of the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae and interactions with Plasmodium falciparum infection. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002742.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Ren C, Webster P, Finkel SE, Tower J. Increased internal and external bacterial load during Drosophila aging without life-span trade-off. Cell Metab. 2007;6:144–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Rivero A, Giron D, Casas J. Lifetime allocation of juvenile and adult nutritional resources to egg production in a holometabolous insect. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;268:1231–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Benoit JB, Lopez-Martinez G, Patrick KR, Phillips ZP, Krause TB, Denlinger DL. Drinking a hot blood meal elicits a protective heat shock response in mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:8026–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Motard A, Marussig M, Rénia L, Baccam D, Landau I, Mattei D, et al. Immunization with the malaria heat shock like protein hsp70-1 enhances transmission to the mosquito. Int Immunol. 1995;7:147–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Vaughan JA, Noden BH, Beier JC. Prior blood feeding effects on susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) to infection with cultured Plasmodium falciparum (Haemosporida: Plasmodiidae). J Med Entomol. 1994;31:445–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Edman JD. Rate of digestion of vertebrate blood in Aedes aegypti (L.). Effect of age, mating, and parity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1970;19:1031–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Mboera LE, Kihonda J, Braks MA, Knols BG. Short report: Influence of centers for disease control light trap position, relative to a human-baited bed net, on catches of Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus in Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59:595–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Churcher TS, Trape J-F, Cohuet A. Human-to-mosquito transmission efficiency increases as malaria is controlled. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6054.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pigeault et al. 2015

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement