Open Access

A yeast strain associated to Anopheles mosquitoes produces a toxin able to kill malaria parasites

  • Matteo Valzano1,
  • Valentina Cecarini1,
  • Alessia Cappelli1,
  • Aida Capone1,
  • Jovana Bozic1,
  • Massimiliano Cuccioloni1,
  • Sara Epis2,
  • Dezemona Petrelli1,
  • Mauro Angeletti1,
  • Anna Maria Eleuteri1,
  • Guido Favia1 and
  • Irene Ricci1Email author
Malaria Journal201615:21

Received: 4 June 2015

Accepted: 17 December 2015

Published: 11 January 2016



Malaria control strategies are focusing on new approaches, such as the symbiotic control, which consists in the use of microbial symbionts to prevent parasite development in the mosquito gut and to block the transmission of the infection to humans. Several microbes, bacteria and fungi, have been proposed for malaria or other mosquito-borne diseases control strategies. Among these, the yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus has been recently isolated from the gut of Anopheles mosquitoes, where it releases a natural antimicrobial toxin. Interestingly, many environmental strains of W. anomalus exert a wide anti-bacterial/fungal activity and some of these ‘killer’ yeasts are already used in industrial applications as food and feed bio-preservation agents. Since a few studies showed that W. anomalus killer strains have antimicrobial effects also against protozoan parasites, the possible anti-plasmodial activity of the yeast was investigated.


A yeast killer toxin (KT), purified through combined chromatographic techniques from a W. anomalus strain isolated from the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi, was tested as an effector molecule to target the sporogonic stages of the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei, in vitro. Giemsa staining was used to detect morphological damages in zygotes/ookinetes after treatment with the KT. Furthermore, the possible mechanism of action of the KT was investigated pre-incubating the protein with castanospermine, an inhibitor of β-glucanase activity.


A strong anti-plasmodial effect was observed when the P. berghei sporogonic stages were treated with KT, obtaining an inhibition percentage up to around 90 %. Microscopy analysis revealed several ookinete alterations at morphological and structural level, suggesting the direct implication of the KT-enzymatic activity. Moreover, evidences of the reduction of KT activity upon treatment with castanospermine propose a β-glucanase-mediated activity.


The results showed the in vitro killing efficacy of a protein produced by a mosquito strain of W. anomalus against malaria parasites. Further studies are required to test the KT activity against the sporogonic stages in vivo, nevertheless this work opens new perspectives for the possible use of killer strains in innovative strategies to impede the development of the malaria parasite in mosquito vectors by the means of microbial symbionts.


Wickerhamomyces anomalus Plasmodium berghei Anopheles stephensi Malaria Symbiotic control Killer toxin


Malaria is one of the most alarming infectious diseases threatening millions people, mostly in sub-Saharan regions [1, 2]. It is caused by Plasmodium protozoan parasites and transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes. Even though several traditional remedies are in use, the disease continues to represent a heavy health burden in endemic countries. In absence of effective vaccines, public health programmes have focused their resources on the use of insecticides to reduce the number of vector populations, and/or drugs to kill directly the pathogens [3].

Malaria control programmes involving chemical and pharmacological treatments are not always sustainable due to several factors, such as economic costs and logistic aspects. In addition, both vectors and parasites have enhanced resistance against many commonly used pesticides and medicines. Confirmed resistance of 125 mosquito species lead the Malaria Eradication Research Agenda to state that novel control strategies are urgently requested for malaria suppression [4]. In this frame, a new tool called “Symbiotic Control” (SC) has been recently proposed. The SC is a multifaceted approach that exploits symbiotic microorganisms to control insect pests reducing their vector capabilities [5, 6]. This strategy implies the identification of suitable microbes able to spread among the vector populations. Several microbes have been proposed for malaria-SC, including the bacteria Asaia, Wolbachia, Pantoea agglomerans, Elizabethkingia meningoseptica and the fungi Metarhizium robertsii and Wickerhamomyces anomalus [712].

The yeast W. anomalus has been recently isolated from different mosquito species [13] and its intimate association with its host has been well characterized in the Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi, where the yeast localizes to gut and gonads, suggesting specific biological roles in these anatomical districts [12]. Similar to various environmental strains used as bio-preservation agents for their anti-bacterial/fungal activities in food industry, the W. anomalus strain isolated from An. stephensi secretes an antimicrobial KT, which might exert an antiseptic function in the mosquito [14, 15]. Previous results showed the effective antimicrobial activity of the KT, produced by W. anomalus strain of mosquito against other targeted yeasts [14]. The W. anomalus potency to be stimulated for KT production was demonstrated, whose releases in the mosquito midgut and gonads showing long-lasting features [14]. Consequently, the possible KT anti-plasmodial effect against parasite developmental stages was investigated, taking place in mosquito gut. In the present study, a strong in vitro antimicrobial activity of the KT secreted by the W. anomalus strain isolated from Anopheles stephensi against the sporogonic stages of the malaria rodent parasite Plasmodium berghei was determined and a killing mechanism of action based on a β-glucanase enzymatic activity was proposed.


Yeast strains

Three W. anomalus strains were used: (1) WaF17.12 isolated from An. stephensi [12], (2) WaATCC 96603 a KT-producer reference strain and (3) WaUM3 a WaKT-non-producing and, furthermore, WaKT-susceptible strain [16, 17]. These yeasts were grown in YPD liquid medium (20 g/l peptone, 20 g/l glucose, 10 g/l yeast extract) buffered at pH 4.5 with 0.1 M citric acid and 0.2 M potassium phosphate dibasic and incubated at 26 °C for 36 h at 70 rpm to stimulate the production of KTs [18, 19].

Purification of yeast KTs

The yeast cultures obtained after 36 h incubation were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min to remove cells. The supernatants were filtered using 0.22 μm nitrocellulose membranes, and concentrated 50× using an Amicon system equipped with Millipore Ultracell ultrafiltration disk (MWCO: 10 kDa). The samples were further concentrated using Pierce Concentrators centrifugal ultrafiltration tubes with a MWCO of 9 kDa (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc). Resulting solutions were analysed by anion-exchange chromatography on a FPLC AKTA Basic device equipped with a HiTrap DEAE FF column (GE Healthcare) using a linear gradient of buffer A (0.1 M citric acid and 0.2 M K2HPO4, pH 4.5) and buffer B (0.1 M citric acid and 0.2 M K2HPO4, pH 4.5), flow rate 5 ml/min.

Retained and non-retained fractions for each strain were collected from different runs, quantified for protein content according to the Bradford’s method [20] and tested for the presence of killing activity against the susceptible strain WaUM3, as described by Cappelli [14]. Prior to anti-P. berghei activity assay, the non-retained fractions of WaF17.12 and WaATCC 96603 showing the KT activity, and the non-retained fraction of WaUM3 (negative control), were buffer-exchanged with an Hi-Trap desalting column to PBS 1× (10 mM Na2HPO4, 2.7 mM KCl, 138 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) to prevent possible interference, like pH-incompatibility, with the parasite development.

Ethics statement

BALB/c mice were reared in the animal facilities of the University of Camerino (Italy). Experimental animal rearing and handling were fully in agreement with the Italian Directive 116 of 10/27/92 on the “use and protection of laboratory animals”, and in compliance with the European regulation (86/609) of 11/24/86 (license no. 125/94A, issued by the Italian Ministry of Health). The experimentation was approved by the Ethical Committee of University of Camerino.

Mice infection and Plasmodium berghei sporogonic stages cultures

Five-week-old BALB/c mice were infected with a recombinant P. berghei strain (PbCTRPp.GFP) from a cryopreserved stock, as previously described by Vlachou et al. [21]. This transgenic parasite expresses the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) during ookinete development under the control of the ctrp promoter, whereas no signal is exhibited in the asexual blood stages and gametocytes. After 4 days, mice parasitaemia and haematocrit were evaluated using Giemsa staining and Neubauer’s chamber, respectively. Mice with a parasitaemia in the range 5–10 % were selected as donors, and 107 infected red blood cells (IRBC) were inoculated into healthy mice, previously treated with phenylhydrazine to induce reticulocytosis [22]. After further 4 days, exflagellation centres were counted as indicators of parasite infectivity [23], using an optical microscope with a 40× objective (Carl Zeiss Axio Observer.Z1, Milan, Italy). To induce exflagellation, 5 µl of infected blood were blended with 120 µl of incomplete ookinete medium (16.4 g/l RPMI1640 containing 25 mM HEPES/l-glutamine, 2 % NaHCO3, 0.05 % hypoxanthine, 100 µM xanthurenic acid, pH 8) and incubated 20 min at 22 °C as reported by Ghosh et al. [24]. After the check of exflagellation centers, gametocytaemic blood was collected by cardiac puncture.

Plasmodium berghei sporogonic stages were obtained, in vitro, culturing 20 µl of infected blood with 180 µl of complete ookinete medium in a 96-wells microtitre plates. Complete medium was prepared supplementing the above-mentioned incomplete medium with 20 % heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 50 U/ml penicillin and 50 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). Ookinetes developed after about 24 h at 19 °C.

In vitro WaKTs anti-plasmodial activity

The fractions containing the KTs obtained by chromatographic analysis of the extracts, from WaF17.12, WaATCC 96603 (positive control) and WaUM3 (negative control) were tested against P. berghei sporogonic stage cultures prepared as described above. Four concentrations (25, 60, 75, 100 µg/ml) of KTs from both WaF17.12 and WaATCC 96603 were tested; whereas for WaUM3, the purification product was tested at the highest concentration possible to evaluate interference due to buffer solution. Concurrently, in each control well, PBS 1× pH 7.4 (without KT) was added to ookinete complete medium and gametocytaemic blood. After 24 h incubation at 19 °C, the KTs anti-plasmodial activity was estimated comparing the number of fluorescent P. berghei sporogonic stages in both control and sample wells using a fluorescence microscope and 40× objective (Carl Zeiss Axio Observer.Z1, Milan, Italy). The assays were performed in triplicate using 96-wells microtitre plates and the results were reported as the averages of inhibition percentages of parasite development.

The LC50 (KTs concentration at which 50 % of the parasite population is killed) was evaluated after 24 h. This value was determined by nonlinear regression analysis plotting the number of sporogonic stages versus log[KT] with GraphPad Prism 5 software as described by Savoia et al. [25].

Statistical analysis

Five runs of parasite cultures were obtained during the experimentation and the results of each run were reproducible. All the experiments against Plasmodium sporogonic stages were repeated in triplicate. The data obtained from parasite counts were analysed with GraphPad Prism 5 software and statistical analysis was carried out by One Way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Tests. Statistical significance is expressed as a p value <0.05.

Morphological analysis of Plasmodium berghei sporogonic stages using Giemsa staining

Control and KT-treated (KTs concentration 100 μg/ml) P. berghei sporogonic stages slides were investigated for possible damages induced by KT-activity on the zygote and/or ookinete morphologies. Briefly, 5 μl of parasite cultures were smeared onto a glass slide, fixed by methanol for 15 min at room temperature and stained for 45 min with 10 % Giemsa solution (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS 1× pH 7.4. After this incubation period the samples were analysed using a microscope and 100× objective (Carl Zeiss Axio Observer.Z1, Milan, Italy).

Castanospermine assay

Purified KTs (100 μg/ml) from both WaF17.12 and WaATCC 96603 were pre-incubated with 25 µM of castanospermine (Sigma-Aldrich), a β-glucanase inhibitor, for 1 h at 25 °C under static conditions [26] and, then, added to the P. berghei cultures, in triplicates. The inhibitory effect of the indolizine alkaloid on the antimicrobial activity of KTs was evaluated on P. berghei sporogonic stage cultures after 24 h incubation at 19 °C and it was indicated as the average of three replicates. Upon castanospermine treatment, the number of parasites was compared to controls.


Purification of KTs

The KTs from W. anomalus strains were purified to test their ability to inhibit the development of P. berghei sporogonic stages. The purification process started with the production of the KT in yeast culture medium, and proceeded with a series of concentrations and chromatographic steps.

Three different strains of W. anomalus growing in conditions stimulating the production of toxin [14] were used: (1) the KT-producer WaF17.12 isolated from An. stephensi mosquitoes; (2) the KT-producer WaATCC 96603 (positive control), and (3) the non KT-producer WaUM3 (negative control). Anion-exchange chromatography analysis has revealed the presence of two major peaks in each yeast strains analysed: non-retained and retained fractions (Fig. 1). Due to similar chromatographic profiles, a killing activity test was performed in order to discriminate effective KT presence in the fractions obtained from the three different strains. Killing activity assay on the susceptible WaUM3 strain, revealed KT presence only in the first eluted fraction of WaF17.12 and WaATCC 96603 strains (see Additional file 1).
Fig. 1

Anion-exchange chromatography profile. Profile obtained through the anion-exchange chromatography (DEAE) performed on the concentrated supernatant of the strain WaF1712. The same elution profile was achieved also for the strains WaATCC 96603 (positive control) and WaUM3 (negative control)

Accordingly, these fractions were used against P. berghei sporogonic stages.

In vitro anti-plasmodial activity of WaKTs

KTs purified from WaF17.12 and WaATCC 96603 supernatants were tested on P. berghei cultures. KT concentrations were compatible with those of killer peptides used against the promastigotes of Leishmania sp., in vitro conditions [25]. The KTs secreted by both W. anomalus F17.12 and W. anomalus ATCC 96603 showed anti-plasmodial activity against the development of P. berghei sporogonic stages; whereas no effect was detected when the cultures were incubated with the purified supernatant of WaUM3. Indeed, the ookinetes treated with non-retained fraction of WaUM3 showed a comparable development with the control (see Additional file 2).

Notably, KTs activity showed a dose-depending trend. Treatment with 100 µg/ml of WaF17.12 and WaATCC 96603 KTs induced the highest inhibition percentages of the sporogonic stages development (87.5 and 92.3 %, respectively) (Fig. 2). Inhibition percentages upon exposure to 25, 60, 75 µg/ml of WaF17.12 KT were approximately of 17, 43 and 66 %, whereas for WaATCC 96603 KT were about 16, 48 and 70 % (Fig. 3). The values of LC50 were 61.3 and 64.6 µg/ml for WaATCC 96603 and WaF17.12, respectively, suggesting an equivalent activity of the two proteins.
Fig. 2

In vitro anti-plasmodial activity of WaKTs against Plasmodium berghei sporogonic stages. The development of sporogonic stages showed inhibition rates of 87.5 and 92.3 % when they were incubated with 100 µg/ml of WaF17.12 and WaATCC 96603 KTs, respectively, for 24 h at 19 °C. The histogram reports the average numbers of the sporogonic stages obtained from the cell count of three wells for each treatment and control (LC50 values were 61.3 and 64.6 µg/ml for WaATCC 96603 and WaF17.12, respectively). The One Way ANOVA Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison tests were used to perform the statistical analysis. Statistical significance is expressed as a p value. ***p < 0.001

Fig. 3

Inhibition percentages of Plasmodium berghei sporogonic stages development at different KTs concentration. The KTs of WaF17.12 and WaATCC 96603 showed a dose-dependent activity at the tested concentrations of 100, 75, 60 and 25 µg/ml. Inhibition percentages upon exposure to 25, 60, 75 µg/ml of WaF17.12 KT were approximately of 17, 43, 66 %, whereas for WaATCC 96603 KT were about 16, 48 and 70 %

Investigation of morphological/structural alterations in treated parasites

Upon GFP-parasites treatment with KTs, a lower fluorescence signal in the sporogonic stages was detected. Figure 4 shows a comparison between control and treated parasites from zygotes to ookinetes. Intracellular GFP leakage might result from KTs-induced alterations on the permeability of the parasites cell membrane. To better investigate KT-induced morphological changes in P. berghei sporogonic stages, smears of parasites cultures were stained with 10 % Giemsa. Morphologically, alterations of the post-zygotic stages were evidenced, whereas no particular differences were observed at the zygotes level (Fig. 5). In details, zygotes from both groups (controls and KTs-treated) appeared comparable in size with intensely colored cytoplasm while treated ones showed irregular borders and less defined cytoplasmic granules and crystalloid precursors (Fig. 5a, d). In control parasites, the ookinete development was characterized by a completed elongation process and the presence of a strong staining and well-defined crystalloid organelles surrounded with haemozoin (Fig. 5b, c). The morphological/structural alterations of the post-zygotic stages of the KT-treated parasites included: (1) irregular cell-shape and jagged cell borders; (2) a feeble staining of cytoplasmic region; (3) the lack of crystalloid assembly and (4) less-defined cytoplasmic granules, (Fig. 5e, f).
Fig. 4

Fluorescence microscopy evaluation of GFP-transfected parasites. Different stages of untreated parasite development are shown in ac (a zygote; b elongated zygote; c mature ookinete). e and g show faint fluorescent signals into zygotes (indicated by white arrows) treated with WaF17.12-KT. In d and f phase-contrasts (the zygotes are indicated by white arrows) are shown. All the parasites were observed using a ×100 objective. In ac scale bar 10 μm whereas in dg scale bar 20 μm

Fig. 5

Images of Plasmodium berghei cultures in Giemsa-stained smears. Parasites sporogonic stages, both controls (ac) and treated with 100 µg/ml of WaF17.12 KT (df) were stained with Giemsa and analysed under light microscope (×100 objective). See text for details. Scale bar 10 μm

Possible KT mechanism of action

The main antimicrobial mechanism of W. anomalus involves the direct killing of sensitive microorganisms by releasing of KTs that recognize specific cell-wall receptors on target membranes [27]. One of the proposed mechanism of action of these proteins is based on their interference with the glucans determining a β-1,3-glucanase activity [28].

To verify if the toxicity against the P. berghei sporogonic stages of KTs was mediated by β-glucanase activity, the KTs of both WaF17.12 and WaATCC 96603 were treated with castanospermine, a β-glucanase inhibitor [26]. Castanospermine-induced inhibition of KTs was evaluated after 24 h incubation compared to controls (Table 1). Castanospermine induced a reduction in the killer activity of both proteins (from 79.7 to 46.2 % in the case of WaF17.12 and from 88.5 to 49.5 % in the case of WaATCC 96603) confirming the possible correlation between the enzymatic activity of KTs and the killer phenotype of the yeast.
Table 1

Effects of castanospermine on KTs activity against P. berghei



Average number of sporogonic stages/well

β-Glucanase inhibitor (25 μM)

KTs (100 μg/ml)



305 ± 22.7



62 ± 11.5


WaATCC 96603-KT

35 ± 4.6



125 ± 8.1


WaATCC 96603-KT

151 ± 4.5


The yeast W. anomalus is known to display natural antimicrobial properties against a wide range of microbes, including the protozoan parasites Leishmania sp. and Acanthamoeba castellanii [15, 25, 29]. Herein, through a rapid chromatographic protocol [30], WaKT produced by WaF17.12 strain, isolated from the major Asian malaria mosquito vector, An. stephensi, was purified. Furthermore, the first evidence of this KT inhibition potential against P. berghei sporogonic stages in laboratory cultures was provided. The obtained outcomes report an undeniable parasite inhibition up to 90 % compared to control samples. Alongside, although WaATCC 96603 reference strain has been already described for its robust multi-target killing activity, its efficacy against P. berghei sporogonic stages was additionally estimated.

Subsequently, WaKT action mechanism was investigated through both enzymatic tests and Giemsa staining. Previous work demonstrated that KTs bind to cell-wall primary receptors, and then, move to secondary ones in the plasma membrane inducing the death of sensitive cells through DNA damages and apoptosis [25]. In particular, KT activity was associated with the hydrolysis of the β-glucans located in cell-wall membranes [28]. Notably, the β-1,3-glucans recognized by KT, are known to be present not only in fungi but also in cell-wall of parasites, as reported in the protozoa Toxoplasma and Eimeria [31], and they are implicated in the immune-protection against P. berghei infection in mice [32].

Moreover, it is reported that the bond between the KT and the membrane receptors causes the formation of transmembrane channels, determining the leak of intracellular materials [33]. A similar event was detected in amphotericin-treated promastigotes of Leishmania major suggesting a loss of intra-cellular material from apoptotic cells [25]. In this frame, a lower fluorescent signal in sporogonic stages treated with KT was observed respect to controls. The morphological and structural alterations observed in KT-treated parasites, using Giemsa staining, confirmed that WaF17.12 KT targets the sporogonic stages of Plasmodium, interfering with the correct development of mature ookinetes.

Additionally, β-glucanase implication is also supported by the presence of the genes responsible for β-1-3-glucanase synthesis (EXG1 and EXG2) in the genome of W. anomalus [14, 34, 35]: their single or coupled silencing was in fact correlated with the lack of the yeast antimicrobial function; however, no direct relationship has been yet demonstrated between these genes and the KT activity [36].

For this reason, to evaluate the direct involvement of a β-glucanase activity of KT on malaria parasites, the β-glucanase inhibitor castanospermine was used. The inhibitory effect of castanospermine on the WaKT activity confirmed a β-glucanase-mediated mechanism of action, resulting consistent with data on Tetrapisispora phaffi [26]. However it is worth to underline that inhibition percentages in castanospermine-treated samples is still lower with respect untreated control: this is easily explained by the shortage of a suitable molecule concentration to saturate all the KT active sites.

Finally, an in-depth analysis of our results reinforced the idea that KT, produced by the strain isolated from mosquitoes, interacts with specific receptors, the β-glucans, localized on the surface of P. berghei cells and strongly inhibits their development from gametocytes to ookinetes.


The overall outcome from this study paves the way for better understanding of the effect of WaKTs on the malaria parasite in the mosquito midgut, which coincides with the bottleneck in Plasmodium life cycle. Previously, Cappelli et al. showed that the W. anomalus strain associated to mosquito is able to produce a KT in An. stephensi [14]. Herein, it was demonstrated that this protein is strongly active against P. berghei, in vitro conditions. Future in vivo studies will focus on the action of KTs against rodent malaria parasites with the prospect to provide a natural tool for innovative malaria SC strategies.



Symbiotic control


Killer toxin


Green fluorescent protein


Circumsporozoite and TRAP related protein


Infected red blood cells


Yeast extract peptone dextrose


Molecular weight cut off


Fast protein liquid chromatography


Diethylaminoethanol fast flow


Phosphate buffered saline


Lethal concentration 50


Authors’ contributions

MV designed and carried out the in vitro assays to evaluate the anti-plasmodial activity of WaKTs; acquired the data and interpreted the results presented in the manuscript. VC performed the biochemical characterization of WaF17.12 KT; compiled the data and presented it in the form as it appears in the manuscript. AlC performed the experiments with MV and VC. AiC and JB cooperated in yeast cultivation and toxin purification. MC cooperated in the purification of the toxin. SE partially cooperated in practical. DP, MA, AME and GF advised on practical and reviewed the manuscript. IR conceived the experiments and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


The research was supported from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013_ FP7/2007-2011) under Grant agreement No. 281222 to Irene Ricci.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino
Department of Veterinary Sciences and Public Health, University of Milan


  1. Murray CJ, Rosenfeld LC, Lim SS, Andrews KG, Foreman KJ, Haring D, et al. Global malaria mortality between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:413–31. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wang S, Jacobs-Lorena M. Genetic approaches to interfere with malaria transmission by vector mosquitoes. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:185–93. doi: CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Riehle MA, Jacobs-Lorena M. Using bacteria to express and display anti-parasite molecules in mosquitoes: current and future strategies. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;35:699–707.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. malERA consultative group on basis science and enabling technologies. A research agenda for malaria eradication: basic science and enabling technologies. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000399.Google Scholar
  5. Douglas AE. Symbiotic microorganisms: untapped resources for insect pest control. Trends Biotechnol. 2007;25:338–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ricci I, Valzano M, Ulissi U, Epis S, Cappelli A, Favia G. Symbiotic control of mosquito borne disease. Pathog Glob Health. 2012;106:380–5. doi: CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Favia G, Ricci I, Damiani C, Raddadi N, Crotti E, Marzorati M, et al. Bacteria of the genus Asaia stably associate with Anopheles stephensi, an Asian malarial mosquito vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:9047–51.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang J, Zhang Q, Huang Z, Liu Z. Directed evolution of a family 26 glycoside hydrolase: endo-β-1, 4-mannanase from Pantoea agglomerans A021. J Biotechnol. 2013;167:350–6. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang S, Ghosh AK, Bongio N, Stebbings KA, Lampe DJ, Jacobs-Lorena M. Fighting malaria with engineered symbiotic bacteria from vector mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:12734–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindh JM, Borg-Karlson AK, Faye I. Transstadial and horizontal transfer of bacteria within a colony of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) and oviposition response to bacteria-containing water. Acta Trop. 2008;107:242–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang W, Vega-Rodríguez J, Ghosh AK, Jacobs-Lorena M, Kang A, St Leger RJ. Development of transgenic fungi that kill human malaria parasites in mosquitoes. Science. 2011;331:1074–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ricci I, Damiani C, Scuppa P, Mosca M, Crotti E, Rossi P, et al. The yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus (Pichia anomala) inhabits the midgut and reproductive system of the Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:911–21. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ricci I, Mosca M, Valzano M, Damiani C, Scuppa P, Rossi P, et al. Different mosquito species host Wickerhamomyces anomalus (Pichia anomala): perspectives on vector-borne diseases symbiotic control. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2011;99:43–50. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cappelli A, Ulissi U, Valzano M, Damiani C, Epis S, Gabrielli MG, et al. A Wickerhamomyces anomalus killer strain in the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi. PLoS One. 2014;9:e95988. doi: CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Walker GM. Pichia anomala: cell physiology and biotechnology relative to other yeasts. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2011;99:25–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Polonelli L, Morace G. Production and characterization of yeast killer toxin monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:460–2.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Polonelli L, Séguy N, Conti S, Gerloni M, Bertolotti D, Cantelli C, et al. Monoclonal yeast killer toxin-like candidacidal anti-idiotypic antibodies. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1997;4:142–6.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Guyard C, Séguy N, Cailliez JC, Drobecq H, Polonelli L, Dei-Cas E, et al. Characterization of a Williopsis saturnus var. mrakii high molecular weight secreted killer toxin with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49:961–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Izgu F, Altinbay D, Acun T. Killer toxin of Pichia anomala NCYC 432; purification, characterization and its exo-β-1,3-glucanase activity. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2006;39:669–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Vlachou D, Schlegelmilch T, Christophides GK, Kafatos FC. Functional genomic analysis of midgut epithelial responses in Anopheles during Plasmodium invasion. Curr Biol. 2005;15:1185–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Rodríguez LE, Urquiza M, Ocampo M, Curtidor H, Suárez J, García J, et al. Plasmodium vivax MSP-1 peptides have high specific binding activity to human reticulocytes. Vaccine. 2002;20:1331–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramakrishnan C, Delves MJ, Lal K, Blagborough AM, Butcher G, Baker KW, et al. Laboratory maintenance of rodent malaria parasites. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;923:51–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghosh AK, Dinglasan RR, Ikadai H, Jacobs-Lorena M. An improved method for the in vitro differentiation of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes into ookinetes. Malar J. 2010;9:194. doi: CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Savoia D, Scutera S, Raimondo S, Conti S, Magliani W, Polonelli L. Activity of an engineered synthetic killer peptide on Leishmania major and Leishmania infantum promastigotes. Exp Parasitol. 2006;113:186–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Comitini F, Mannazzu I, Ciani M. Tetrapisispora phaffii killer toxin is a highly specific beta-glucanase that disrupts the integrity of the yeast cell wall. Microb Cell Fact. 2009;8:55. doi: CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bevan EA, Makower M. The physiological basis of the killer character in yeast. In: Proceeding of the 11th International Conference on Genetics, vol. 1. Oxford Pergamon Press, Oxford; 1963, pp. 53–8.Google Scholar
  28. Magliani W, Conti S, Giovati L, Maffei DL, Polonelli L. Anti-beta-glucan-like immunoprotective candidacidal antiidiotypic antibodies. Front Biosci. 2008;13:6920–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Fiori PL, Mattana A, Dessì D, Conti S, Magliani W, Polonelli L. In vitro acanthamoebicidal activity of a killer monoclonal antibody and a synthetic peptide. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57:891–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Guo FJ, Ma Y, Xu HM, Wang XH, Chi ZM. A novel killer toxin produced by the marine-derived yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus YF07b. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2013;103:737–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bushkin GG, Motari E, Magnelli P, Gubbels MJ, Dubey JP, Miska KB, et al. β-1,3-glucan, which can be targeted by drugs, forms a trabecular scaffold in the oocyst walls of Toxoplasma and Eimeria. MBio. 2012;3:e00258–312. doi: CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Maheshwari R, Siddiqui MU. Immunoprotection by beta-1,3 glucan antigen combination in Plasmodium berghei infection in mice. Indian J Med Res. 1989;89:396–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Buzdar MA, Chi Z, Wang Q, Hua MX, Chi ZM. Production, purification, and characterization of a novel killer toxin from Kluyveromyces siamensis against a pathogenic yeast in crab. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;91:1571–9. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Schneider J, Rupp O, Trost E, Jaenicke S, Passoth V, Goesmann A, et al. Genome sequence of Wickerhamomyces anomalus DSM 6766 reveals genetic basis of biotechnologically important antimicrobial activities. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012;12:382–6. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Muccilli S, Wemhoff S, Restuccia C, Meinhardt F. Exoglucanase-encoding genes from three Wickerhamomyces anomalus killer strains isolated from olive brine. Yeast. 2013;30:33–43. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Friel D, Pessoa NM, Vandenbol M, Jijakli MH. Separate and combined disruptions of two exo-beta-1,3-glucanase genes decrease the efficiency of Pichia anomala (strain K) biocontrol against Botrytis cinerea on apple. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007;20:371–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Valzano et al. 2016


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.