Open Access

A zoonotic human infection with simian malaria, Plasmodium knowlesi, in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

  • Wuryantari Setiadi1Email author,
  • Herawati Sudoyo1,
  • Hidayat Trimarsanto1,
  • Boy Adventus Sihite3,
  • Riahdo Juliarman Saragih3,
  • Rita Juliawaty4,
  • Suradi Wangsamuda1,
  • Puji Budi Setia Asih1 and
  • Din Syafruddin1, 2
Malaria Journal201615:218

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1272-z

Received: 29 January 2016

Accepted: 1 April 2016

Published: 16 April 2016

Abstract

Background

The Indonesian archipelago is endemic for malaria. Although Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax are the most common causes for malaria cases, P. malariae and P. ovale are also present in certain regions. Zoonotic case of malaria had just became the attention of public health communities after the Serawak study in 2004. However, zoonotic case in Indonesia is still under reported; only one published report of knowlesi malaria in South Kalimantan in 2010.

Case presentation

A case of Plasmodium knowlesi infection in a worker from a charcoal mining company in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia was described. The worker suffered from fever following his visit to a lowland forest being cut and converted into a new mining location.

Conclusion

This study confirmed a zoonotic infection using polymerase chain reaction amplification and Sanger sequencing of plasmodial DNA encoding the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (mtCOI).

Keywords

Plasmodium knowlesi Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase sub-unit I (mtCOI)Central KalimantanIndonesia

Background

Endemic zoonotic malaria caused by Plasmodium knowlesi was confirmed in Malaysian Borneo in 2004. That discovery was not an outbreak, but corrected the misdiagnosis of such infections as Plasmodium malariae, despite an atypical hyper-parasitemia and far more severe clinical manifestations. Molecular analysis indeed found that the majority of malaria cases (120 out of 208 or 58 %) in Sarawak were caused by a primate malaria P. knowlesi [1]. Since then, P. knowlesi cases were also reported in Thailand [24], Phillippines [5], Singapore [68], Vietnam [9, 10] and Myanmar [11, 12]. In Indonesian Borneo (Kalimantan) that shares a border with the Malaysian state of Sarawak, a case of P. knowlesi in one patient was reported in 2010 [13]. As had occurred in Sarawak before 2004, malaria surveillance activities in Indonesia principally use microscopic diagnosis and no P. knowlesi infection was found among the surveyed areas. With the current deforestation activities, Indonesia is indeed very ripe for P. knowlesi risk [14].

In this report, a case of P. knowlesi malaria from a patient residing in Central Kalimantan was detected using mtCOI as a molecular target for a specific diagnosis. Mitochondrial COI gene has been used for diagnostic and species differentiation of a wide range of taxa [15]. The important advantage of mtCOI gene as marker for diagnosis and species differentiation is that it possesses a multiple copy number per haploid cell and a greater range of phylogenetic signal than any other mitochondrial and nuclear gene [16].

Case presentation

In September 2014, a 60-year old Indonesian male who worked at a coal mining company presented to hospital at Muara Teweh, Barito Utara regency, Central Kalimantan province (Fig. 1) with a 2-day history of fever, headache, musculoskeletal pain, and malaise. He was admitted to the hospital mentally alert, with a body temperature of 38.3 °C, blood pressure of 150/70 mm Hg, pulse rate 96/min, respiratory rate 24/min. Previously, the patient had spent 2 days in the jungle in Barito Utara District, Central Kalimantan surveying a new location for mining. Two weeks after returning from the jungle he experienced the onset of fever for 2 days and went to the hospital on the third day of fever.
Fig. 1

Map of Kalimantan, Indonesia, showing areas (red) where human Plasmodium knowlesi infection was found in Barito Utara, Central Kalimantan (obtained from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: Lokasi Kalimantan Tengah Kabupaten Barito Utara.svg)

On the first day of hospitalization, laboratory examination revealed mild anaemia, a normal leukocyte count, and slight thrombocytopaenia. There was an increase in the level of concurrent blood glucose, normal creatinine, and alanine aminotransferases. Urine analysis showed dark yellow and mild albuminuria (+1). The patient was also tested for typhoid fever, and the Widal test revealed no increase of antibody titres related to Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi. At day 2 of hospitalization, the blood laboratory profiles showed that there was a slight increase of haemoglobin level. The number of leukocytes was also increased, however thrombocyte decreased. Laboratory results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical assessment of the patient

Parameter

Values normal (range)

 

Values observed

 
  

Day 1 (admission)

Day 2

Day 5 (discharge)

Haemoglobin (g/dL)

[13.5–16]

11.6

12.4

11.0

Platelets (/µL)

[150,000–450,000]

120,000

50,000

200,000

Total white blood cells (/µL)

[4500–11,000]

8400

9500

8300

Basophils (%)

[0–1]

0

0

0

Eosinophils (%)

[0–5]

0

1

2

Neutrophils stab (%)

[0–5]

1

0

0

Neutrophils segment (%)

[50–70]

79

72

53

Lymphocyte (%)

[20–40]

20

27

41

Monocyte (%)

[1–6]

0

0

4

Random blood glucose (mg/dL)

[<140]

205

Total cholesterol (mg/dL)

[<200]

114

Creatinin (mg/dL)

[0.9–1.3]

1.2

1.5

Alanin amino transferase (IU/L)

[<41]

47

Aspartate amino transferase (IU/L)

[<40]

45

Widal Felix Test

   

 Salmonella typhii titer O

 

Negative

  

 S. typhii titer H

 

Negative

  

 S. paratyphii A titer O

 

1:160

  

 S. paratyphii A titer H

 

1:160

  

 S. paratyphii B titer O

 

Negative

  

 S. paratyphii B titer H

 

Negative

  
Specific laboratory examination for malaria at the first day of admission to the hospital using a rapid diagnosis test (RDT) for malaria (Carestart Malaria HRP2/pLDH (Pf/PAN) Combo Access Bio Inc.) done in duplo. The first result was negative for both Plasmodium falciparum histidine rich protein 2 and aldolase, while the second result was slightly positive for pan-malarial aldolase antigen, but negative for P. falciparum histidine rich protein 2. That result of test prompted microscopic examination on Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood films that revealed a heavy parasitemia (1.25 % of red blood cells infected). The microscopist could definitively assign Plasmodium species identity to the infection. All stages of the parasites such as ring forms, trophozoites and schizonts were observed and the infected red blood cells were normal in size (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Morphology of Plasmodium knowlesi in a Giemsa-stained thin blood smear of subject in Barito Utara regency, Central Kalimantan showing a ring form (a, b), band form trophozoite (c, d), and schizonts (e, f)

The patient was treated with a standard oral regimen of dihydroartemisinin plus piperaquine plus 45 mg primaquine, intravenous crystalloid fluid 1500 ml/24 h, antipyretic and antihypertension drugs. Fever resolved within 24 h of initiating therapy and parasitemia had fallen to <0.01 %. By day 3 the patient had fully recovered and no parasites were detected by microscopy.

PCR analysis of the genomic DNA (gDNAs) extracted from the blood film was performed to determine the Plasmodium species. Firstly, the nested PCR assay was performed by using diagnostic primers for Plasmodium small sub-unit (SSU) rRNA as described [17], but were negative in the four human malaria parasite-specific PCR assays, including species specific primers for determining P. knowlesi [1].

Secondly, another PCR method targeting at the region of the mtCOI gene was performed followed by DNA sequencing of the amplicon. PCR amplification was performed by using primer pairs of PlasmoCOI-FDB 5′ ATACAAATTGTAATCATAAAACTTTAGG 3′ and PlasmoCOI-RDB 5′ ACTTCAGGATGTCCAAAAAACCA3′ in a total volume of 25 µL containing 10 ng/µl Plasmodium DNA, 10× PCR buffer (KAPA Biosystems, USA), 3 mM MgCl2 (KAPA Biosystems), 100 µM dNTPs (New England BioLabs, USA), 0.2 µM of each primer, of 80 µg/µL BSA (New England BioLabs) and 1.25 units of Taq DNA Polymerase (KAPA Biosystems). GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Applied Biosystems, USA) was used to generate the following conditions: denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, five cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. This PCR method revealed DNA bands which was approximately 670 bp in length. The amplicons were then purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and directly sequenced using the BigDyeTM Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit on a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The DNA control samples originated from a known, archived P. falciparum and Plasmodium vivax gDNAs were used as a positive control.

The 670 bp mtCOI fragment from the sample (PLK_ARB2146; GenBank acc. no. KT779096) had 100 % sequence identity with P. knowlesi sequences obtained from both Macaca fascicularis sample (Genebank acc. no. EU880489) and human samples (Genebank acc. no. EU880467, EU880464, EU880461, EU880460, EU880457, EU880451, EU880448) from other study [18]. Bayesian MCMC phylogenetic tree based on the mtCOI sequences of Plasmodium species showed that mtCOI sequences from both sample and other P. knowlesi sequences isolated from human and monkey, as obtained from Genbank, clustered together and formed a monophyletic clade, separated from other Plasmodium species clades. These sequence analysis confirmed that the patient was infected with the P. knowlesi parasite (Fig. 3) [19].
Fig. 3

Maximum clade credibility phylogenetic tree from 670 bp COI-region of Plasmodium family obtained using MrBayes. The tree showed that the sequence of the patient (GenBank acc. no. KT779096) clustered strongly with P. knowlesi mtCOI sequence. The Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum control positive were labelled with green colour

To further confirm of the result, a nested PCR assay was performed using the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) as described [20, 21] and followed by sequencing analysis. Primers for the primary PCR were Plasmodium genus-specific and those for secondary PCR were specific for P. knowlesi. Forward primers for the primary and secondary PCRs were as reported by Putaporntip et al. [20] and the reverse primers were as reported by Tanizaki et al. [21]. The PCR yield an expected amplicon size of 130 bp and the sequencing results displayed 100 % identity with that of P. knowlesi cytb gene (EU880498.1) [22].

Seventy-five days after the patient was hospitalized, a mass blood survey was carried out of 138 workers, including the former patient, at the coal mining company where the patient routinely worked. The mass blood survey consisted of microscopic examination and molecular method using nested PCR assay for Plasmodium 18S-rRNA gene and PCR sequencing of mtCOI gene. Both the microscopic examination and the nested PCR assay for 18S-rRNA gene revealed no infections by any malaria parasite species for all subjects. The PCR-sequencing assay using the mtCOI gene negative for all subjects, with the exception of the former patient which remained positive for P. knowlesi and reconfirmed by cytb gene sequencing indicating that he was apparently asymptomatic and microscopically sub-patent.

The failure to detect the parasites using the other PCR method that target the 18S rRNA gene might be related to the very limited gDNAs obtained through extraction using Giemsa-stained thick blood smear- the parasite density of the blood slide is 1.25 %. This reason was also supported when the PCRs were conducted on during the mass blood survey in which the gDNAs was extracted directly from the whole blood and all are negative by microscopy and only found positive for the mtCOI PCR. The mitochondrial DNAs of the malarial parasite are usually multi-copies (20-150 copies) in haploid cell whereas the 18S rRNA gene has small copy number (two-seven copies) per cell [23, 24]. A low target copy number limits the capabilities of detection, if the parasitemia is low.

The overall results indicated that either the standard malaria treatment using dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and primaquine did not cure completely the patient or the subject may have been re-infected. However, the patient history of no traveling to the jungle or another place after the treatment rather supports for the recrudescence case.

Conclusions

Clearing of natural rainforest on the island of Borneo for agricultural and mining uses has greatly reduced the natural habitat of the non-human primates occurring there. These activities create ecological circumstances that bring humans into contact with malarial parasites and their natural mosquito vectors not normally encountered. The situation creates greatly amplified risk of disease transmission among the human and non-human primates of the region, both zoonotic and anthroponotic [25, 26].

The gold standard of malaria diagnosis has been microscopic examination for over 120 years, despite obvious shortcomings such as P. knowlesi being readily confused for P. falciparum or P. malariae even by experienced microscopists [27]. The current molecular method using SSU-rRNA primers for detecting P. knowlesi such as pmk8 and pmkr9 also rendered inconsistent amplicon [9, 28], and the primers may cross-react with P. vivax gDNAs [29]. In this study, using DNA extracted from the Giemsa-stained thick smear on a routine microscopic slide, the amplicons of region of the mtCOI gene was obtained successfully using the mtCOI primers and the analysis of the mtCOI sequence identified the infecting malaria parasite as P. knowlesi.

This report confirms a second human infection by P. knowlesi in Indonesian Borneo [13]. This finding increases the probability that the P. knowlesi infection represents a significant public health problem, as it does in neighbouring Malaysian Borneo. This case also underlines the importance of conducting active malaria screening in the area using both microscopy and molecular diagnostics to monitor the emergence of P. knowlesi human infection and possible re-infection rates.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. This study received ethical approval from the Eijkman Institute Research Ethics Commission—EIREC no. 58/2013.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

WS carried out the molecular identification of parasite, conceived the study design, analysed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. HS designed the study, wrote and corrected the manuscript. HT analysed the molecular data, constructed the phylogenetic tree, wrote the manuscript. BAS as a clinical parasitologist, RJS as an internist, RJ supervised the sampling, SW examined the slides by microscopy, PBSA supervised the sampling, DS designed the study, wrote and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Nanda Rizki Pratama and Anggi Puspa Nurhidayati for assisting in malaria sampling, Director of Barito Utara District General Hospital for providing us the access to the medical record of the subject, the Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta for the support and encouragement. We thank J. Kevin Baird of the Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology for early feedback on the manuscript. We also thank the volunteers, without whom this study could not have been possible. This study was partially supported by Grant-in-aid provided through Malaria Transmission Consortium (MTC).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology
(2)
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hasanudin
(3)
Muara Teweh Secondary Referral Hospital
(4)
Health Office of Central Kalimantan Province

References

  1. Singh B, Kim Sung L, Matusop A, Radhakrishnan A, Shamsul SSG, Cox-Singh J, et al. A large focus of naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi infections in human beings. Lancet. 2004;363:1017–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jongwutiwes S, Putaporntip C, Iwasaki T, Sata T, Kanbara H. Naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in human Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:2211–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Putaporntip C, Hongsrimuang T, Seethamchai S, Kobasa T, Limkittikul K, Cui L, et al. Differential prevalence of Plasmodium infections and cryptic Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in humans in Thailand. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:1143–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jongwutiwes S, Buppan P, Kosuvin R, Seethamchai S, Pattanawong U, Sirichaisinthop J, et al. Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in humans and macaques Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1799–806.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Luchavez J, Espino F, Curameng P, Espina R, Bell D, Chiodini P, et al. Human infections with Plasmodium knowlesi, the Philippines. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:811–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ng OT, Ooi EE, Lee CC, Lee PJ, Ng LC, Pei SW, et al. Naturally acquired human Plasmodium knowlesi infection Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:814–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Ong CW, Lee SY, Koh WH, Ooi EE, Tambyah PA. Monkey malaria in humans: a diagnostic dilemma with conflicting laboratory data. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:927–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeslyn WPS, Huat TC, Vernon L, Irene LMZ, Sung LK, Jarrod LP, et al. Molecular epidemiological investigation of Plasmodium knowlesi in humans and macaques in Singapore. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:131–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. den Eede PV, Van HN, Van Overmeir C, Vythilingam I, Duc TN, Hung LX, et al. Human Plasmodium knowlesi infections in young children in central Vietnam. Malar J. 2009;8:249.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Marchand RP, Culleton R, Maeno Y, Quang NT, Nakazawa S. Co-infections of Plasmodium knowlesi, Plasmodium falciparum, and Plasmodium vivax among humans and Anopheles dirus mosquitoes, Southern Vietnam. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1232–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang N, Chang Q, Sun X, Lu H, Yin J, Zhang Z, et al. Co-infections with Plasmodium knowlesi and other malaria parasites Myanmar. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1476–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Sermwittayawong N, Singh B, Nishibuchi M, Sawangjaroen N, Vuddhakul V. Human Plasmodium knowlesi infection in Ranong province, southwestern border of Thailand. Malar J. 2012;11:36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Figtree M, Lee R, Bain L, Kennedy T, Mackertich S, Urban M, et al. Plasmodium knowlesi in human, Indonesian Borneo. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:672–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Moyes CL, Henry AJ, Golding N, Huang Z, Singh B, Baird JK, et al. Defining the geographical range of the Plasmodium knowlesi reservoir. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2780.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270:313–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mueller RL. Evolutionary rates, divergence dates, and the performance of mitochondrial genes in Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol. 2006;55:289–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Singh B, Bobogare A, Cox-Singh J, Snounou G, Abdullah MS, Rahman HA. A genus- and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60:687–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee KS, Divis PCS, Zakaria SK, Matusop A, Julin RA, Conway DJ, et al. Plasmodium knowlesi: reservoir hosts and tracking the emergence in humans and macaques. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61:539–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Putaporntip C, Buppan P, Jongwutiwes S. Improved performance with saliva and urine as alternative DNA sources for malaria diagnosis by mitochondrial DNA-based PCR assays. Clin Microb Infect. 2011;17:1484–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanizaki R, Ujiie M, Kato Y, Iwagami M, Hashimoto A, Katsuna S, et al. First case of Plasmodium knowlesi infection in a Japanese traveller returning from Malaysia. Malar J. 2013;12:128.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee KS, Divis PC, Zakaria SK, Matusop A, Julin RA, Conway DJ, et al. Plasmodium knowlesi: reservoir hosts and tracking the emergence in humans and macaques. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Feagin JE. The 6-kb element of Plasmodium falciparum encodes mitochondrial cytochrome genes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992;52:145–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mercereau-Puijalon O, Barale JC, Bischoff E. Three multigene families in Plasmodium parasites: facts and questions. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:1323–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Patz JA, Graczyk TK, Geller N, Vittor AY. Effects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseases. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1395–405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Abegunde AT. Monkey malaria in man. Lancet. 2004;364:1217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cox-Singh J, Singh B. Knowlesi malaria: newly emergent and of public health importance? Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:406–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Sulistyaningsih E, Fitri LE, Löscher T, Berens-Riha N. Diagnostic difficulties with Plasmodium knowlesi infection in humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1033–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Imwong M, Tanomsing N, Pukrittayakamee S, Day NPJ, White NJ, Snounou G. Spurious amplification of a Plasmodium vivax small-subunit RNA gene by use of primers currently used to detect Plasmodium knowlesi. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:4173–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Setiadi et al. 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement