Open Access

Prevalence of Plasmodium spp. in illegal gold miners in French Guiana in 2015: a hidden but critical malaria reservoir

  • Maylis Douine1, 2Email author,
  • Lise Musset3,
  • Florine Corlin1,
  • Stéphane Pelleau3,
  • Jérémie Pasquier4,
  • Louise Mutricy1,
  • Antoine Adenis1, 2,
  • Felix Djossou5,
  • Paul Brousse6,
  • Frédérique Perotti7,
  • Helene Hiwat8,
  • Stephen Vreden9,
  • Magalie Demar2, 4 and
  • Mathieu Nacher1, 2
Malaria Journal201615:315

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1367-6

Received: 17 December 2015

Accepted: 2 June 2016

Published: 9 June 2016

Abstract

Background

Malaria is endemic in French Guiana, an overseas territory of France on the Guiana Shield. Since 2005, notified malaria cases are decreasing. However, new data show that malaria affects many Brazilian gold miners working illegally in French Guiana, the majority of whom are not counted in official data. In addition, one major concern is the usual practice of improper self-treatment in this mining population, raising fear of the development of anti-malarial resistance. This prospective study, conducted in 2015, aimed to estimate the prevalence of Plasmodium spp. in illegal gold miners working in French Guiana.

Methods

The recruitment of gold miners was carried out in resting sites along the French Guiana-Suriname border, where they go for supplies, medical care or leisure. After recording agreement, three malaria diagnostic methods were performed: rapid diagnostic test, microscopy and PCR.

Results

Among 421 persons recruited in the study, malaria prevalence, detected by nested-PCR, was 22.3 % (CI [18.3–26.3], n = 94/421) of which 84 % were asymptomatic.

Conclusions

This significant malaria reservoir in a mobile and illegal population with difficult access to a health care system raises the threat of artemisinin resistance and puts the population of the Guiana Shield at risk of new transmission foci while countries of the region aim at malaria elimination. Even though French legislation may hamper dealing with this population, France must face the reality of malaria in illegal gold miners in order to meet its commitment to malaria elimination.

Keywords

Malaria Illegal gold mining French Guiana Guiana Shield Malaria reservoir

Background

With 198 million cases and 584,000 deaths in 2013, malaria is one of the most widespread parasitic illnesses in the world [1]. Malaria is endemic in French Guiana, a French overseas territory located on the Guiana Shield, between Suriname and Brazil. French Guiana is the size of Portugal, mostly covered by Amazonian forest, and populated by several different ethnic groups, including many immigrants from mainly South America or the Caribbean. Most of the 240,000 inhabitants live on the coast, but some live along the Maroni and Oyapock Rivers. The soil of this region is rich in gold. Nowadays, gold mining is the second largest industrial activity in French Guiana after the Guiana Space Centre. However, the quantity of gold that is illegally extracted every year is over five times that of the legal production [2]. Ten to 15 thousand people, mainly from Brazil, work without authorization in more than 700 different mining sites [3]. Most of these miners, also called garimpeiros, are in French Guiana without visas and administrative documents. This situation has dramatic ecological consequences for the forest and rivers. Living conditions in those settings are very hard with poor hygiene, exhausting work and nutritional deficiencies leading to poor health [4, 5]. Deforestation and still water favour mosquito proliferation, and notably Anopheles darlingi, the main malaria vector. Medical care is free in the French health centres located in the territory, but the remoteness of the mines (sometimes 4 days by boat) and the fear of law enforcement hampers effective access to care by the miners.

Malaria is endemic in French Guiana [6]. Since 2008, the generalized use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), ‘Harpie’ military operations destroying illegal mining camps and supplies, and the positive effects of malaria treatment policy in neighbouring countries, Brazil and Suriname (specially the successful programme ‘Looking for gold, finding malaria’ in mining areas in Suriname [7, 8]), contributed to a decrease in the number of cases [9]. Thus, in 2014, only 450 symptomatic malaria cases were recorded in French Guiana by passive case detection, ten times less than in 2005. [10, 11]. In French Guiana as on the Guiana Shield, the prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum is very high (between 30 and 45 %) comparing to the high prevalence of Plasmodium vivax in South America [1, 11]. Although few data are available, it seems that a large majority of malaria cases in French Guiana concern garimpeiros that are under-reported in official data. This is suggested by indirect observations: (1) soldiers contracting malaria after their assignment in the forest to fight illegal gold mining activities [1215]; (2) local population outbreaks close to gold mining sites [16]; (3) gold miners diagnosed with malaria in Suriname but working in French Guiana in previous weeks; and, (4) the last three notified deaths attributed to malaria in 2013 occurred in illegal gold miners. Consequently, even if the information system used by the Health authorities gives some trends on malaria transmission in gold mines, it only covers the tip of the iceberg. In addition, one major concern, in this historical area of anti-malarial drug emergence is the usual practice of improper self-treatment with ACT in this mining population, raising fear of the development of artemisinin resistance [17].

The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of Plasmodium spp. carriers among the illegal gold-mining population working in French Guiana and the proportion of asymptomatic carriers, in order to estimate the size of the human reservoir.

Methods

Study sites

Assessing the malaria burden in garimpeiros is very difficult because of the absence or confidentiality of information on mining sites, which are mainly located in the Amazonian natural protected area. These places are often very difficult to access, leading to logistical limitations and legal issues. In addition, the climate of lawlessness and violence on these sites hampers the safe characterization of malaria transmission in these populations. However, gold miners come to the mining site in French Guiana either directly from Brazil via the Oyapock River (the border with Brazil), or from Suriname crossing the Maroni River. During their working periods, they also regularly go to ‘resting sites’ spread along these two natural borders. These sites are structured as wooden shacks built around bars/shops. They are places to rest, and to fulfil needs for supplies, medical care or leisure. This cross-sectional, multicentric, observational study was conducted between 1 January and 30 June 2015 in strategic resting sites along the Suriname–French Guiana border. It was implemented on this border only because of: (1) delays in obtaining authorization from the Brazilian Ministry of Health; (2) insufficient funding; and, (3) the majority of illegal mining activity taking place in West French Guiana.

Recruitment

As no data were available, expected Plasmodium spp. prevalence was estimated at 50 % for a maximum sample size. Considering a 5 % error margin, an alpha risk of 0.05 and an estimation of a total population of 10,000 according to the French Army, a minimum of 387 subjects was needed. The sampling was achieved through chance meetings to recruit ‘seeds’ and then the ‘snowball method’ at gold-mining resting sites. Recruitment was carried out by a team with a medical doctor, a nurse and a Brazilian mediator in the resting site, once every 2 weeks during the 6-month study period. The inclusion criteria were: working on a gold mining site in French Guiana; being at the resting site for fewer than 7 days (in relation to the incubation time for malaria); being over 18 years of age; and, accepting to participate in the study. The variables collected were sex, age, country of birth, site of gold mining, presence of fever in the past 48 h, and anti-malarial treatment during the month before inclusion. After checking these inclusion criteria, informing persons and recording agreement, several diagnostic methods were used: a pin-prick blood sampling for malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT), a drop of blood for thick and thin smears, and a 5-ml EDTA blood sample for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). If RDT was positive, the medical doctor provided immediate artemether/lumefantrine treatment according to French recommendations. An insecticide-treated net and an information flyer were also provided to each participant.

Diagnostic methods

The RDT used was the SD Bioline® Pf/Pan test (pfHRP2/pLDH based Standard Diagnostics), as used in health centres in French Guiana. Microscopy was performed at the Parasitology Department of Cayenne Hospital according to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations [18]. DNA was extracted from 200 µL of whole blood with the QIAamp® DNA kit (Qiagen), and a standard nested-PCR targeting the rDNA 18S was performed at the National Reference Centre of Malaria in Institut Pasteur de la Guyane [19]. This method has a detection threshold of one parasite/µl of blood and was therefore used as main outcome for evaluating Plasmodium spp. prevalence. Performances of RDT and microscopy were evaluated using nested-PCR as gold standard. Asymptomatic carriers were defined as persons having a positive PCR for malaria without any fever reported in the previous 48 h given the high prevalence of P. falciparum and P. vivax cases in the region.

Ethical and regulatory approvals

As the recruitment took place on the Suriname border, a partnership with the Ministry of Health Malaria Programme of Suriname was implemented and authorizations obtained. In France, the study was approved by the Comité d’Evaluation Ethique de l’Inserm, an Ethics Committee on Research: Process No 14-187 (IRB00003888 FWA00005831). The authorization of importation of human biological samples was obtained from the French Ministry of Education and Research, Process No IE-2014-758. The database was anonymized and declared to the Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertés.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive data analyses were carried out using Stata12 software.

Results

Study population

During the study, 421 persons working in 68 different mining sites in French Guiana were enrolled. Acceptance to take part in the study was good with a participation rate of 90.5 %, motivated mainly by the opportunity to make a free check-up or because they were grateful to receiving attention. The sex ratio male/female was 2.4 with 297 males (70.6 %). The median age was 37 years (interquartile range (IR) 30–45). The majority of the participants were from Brazil (93.8 %), 3.6 % from Suriname, 1.6 % from French Guiana, and 1 % from other countries. Thirty-eight people declared having had fever in the previous 48 h and 47 having taken an anti-malarial treatment during the past month.

Plasmodium spp. carriers

The PCR prevalence of Plasmodium spp., the primary outcome, was 22.3 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 18.3–26.3 %) with 94 positive persons and a majority of P. falciparum (47.9 %) (Table 1). The median age in the PCR-positive population was 35.5 year old (IR 28–42) and 77.7 % were male. Most people were from Brazil (n = 93/94). Among the PCR-positive people, 17 % had taken an anti-malarial treatment in the past month, and 16 % declared having had fever the past 48 h.
Table 1

Results of different diagnostic methods

 

RDT n (%)

Thick smear n (%)

PCR n (%)

Positive rate

18 (4.3)

17 (4.1)

94 (22.3)

 95 % CI

(2.3–6.2)

(2.2–5.9)

(18.3–22.3)

Plasmodium species

 P. falciparum

8 (44.4)

7 (41.2)

45 (47.9)

 Presence of gametocytes

4 (57)*

 

 P. falciparum/P. vivax

0

10 (10.6)

 P. vivax

10 (55.6)

10 (58.8)

35 (37.2)

 Presence of gametocytes

8 (80)*

 

 P. malariae

0

3 (3.2)

 P. vivax/P. malariae

0

1 (1.1)

* Percentages of gametocyte presence did not differ significantly between 57 and 80 % (p = 0.71)

RDT rapid diagnostic test; PCR polymerase chain reaction

The positive rate of RDT was 4.3 % (95 % CI 2.3–6.2) with 18 positive tests. Fourteen thin blood smears [positivity rate 3.3 % (95 % CI 1.6–5.1)] and 17 thick blood smears [4.1 % (95 % CI 2.2–5.9)] were positive for Plasmodium spp. Fifty-nine percent of the positive thick smears had P. vivax, of which 80 % contained gametocytes, and 41 % P. falciparum, of which 57 % contained gametocytes.

Asymptomatic carriers

Asymptomatic carriers represented 84 % of the PCR-positive population, therefore a prevalence of 18.7 % (95 % CI 15–22.5) in the study population. The median age of asymptomatic carriers was 37 years old (IR 29–43).

The proportion of asymptomatic carriers was linked to the sensitivity of each diagnostic method. 53.3 % of people with positive RDT and 90.4 % of those with positive PCR were asymptomatic (Table 2). Asymptomatic carriage also varied according to the Plasmodium species: 84.4 % for P. falciparum, 88.9 % for P. vivax, and 60 % for P. falciparum/P. vivax co-infection (Table 3). Although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.1), mixed P. falciparum/P. vivax infections seemed to be more often symptomatic than mono-infections.
Table 2

Proportion of asymptomatic infections according to the diagnostic method

 

Asymptomatic n (%)

p

p trend

Yes

No

RDT and PCR positive

8 (53.3)

7 (46.7)

0.003

<0.001

Thick smear and PCR positive

5 (83.3)

1 (16.7)

PCR positive only

66 (90.4)

7 (9.6)

Table 3

Proportion of asymptomatic infections according to Plasmodium species

 

Symptomatic n (%)

Asymptomatic n (%)

P. falciparum

7 (15.6)

38 (84.4)

P. vivax (includes co-infection P. vivax/P. malariae)

4 (11.1)

32 (88.9)

Co-infection P. falciparum/P. vivax

4 (40)

6 (60)

P. malariae

0

3 (100)

Spatial repartition of Plasmodium spp. carriers

The geographical repartition of the cases was heterogeneous among the different gold-mining areas. The 68 mining sites of origin were grouped in ten areas according to proximity and river basin. Prevalence varied from 3.8 to 46.4 % with a higher prevalence in the region located between Maripa Soula and Saül (Fig. 1). Distribution of asymptomatic persons or Plasmodium species did not differ between sites.
Fig. 1

Heterogeneity of Plasmodium spp. carriage between the different illegal gold mining zones in French Guiana, 2015

Sensitivity and specificity of the different diagnostic tests

Compared to nested-PCR, the sensitivity of RDT was very low at 16 %, in this active case detection context, in the absence of pfhrp2 deleted-parasites in French Guiana as observed throughout the quality control of routine diagnosis. However specificity of RDT was high at 99.1 %.

Similar results were found for microscopic examination with a sensitivity and specificity of 18.1 and 100 %, respectively. Therefore, 84 % of Plasmodium spp. carriers would have been missed by only using RDTs, and 82 % by only using microscopic examination. Sensitivity and specificity of those methods were higher in persons reporting fever in the past 48 h: 46.7 and 95.6 % for RDT, and 46.7 and 100 % for microscopic examination, respectively (Table 4).
Table 4

Performance of RDT and thick smear according to past history of fever

 

RDT

Thick smear

Sensitivity % (CI 95 %)

Specificity % (CI 95 %)

Sensitivity % (CI 95 %)

Specificity % (CI 95 %)

Global

16 (9.9–27.7)

99.1 (97.3–99.7)

18.1 (11.6–27.1)

100 (98.8–1)

With fever during past 48 h

46.7 (24.8–69.9)

95.7 (79–99.2)

46.7 (24.8–69.9)

100 (85.7–1)

Without fever

10.1 (5.2–18.7)

99.3 (97.6–99.8)

12.7 (7–21.8)

100 (98.8–1)

Discussion

This study about malaria in illegal gold miners in French Guiana showed a high prevalence of Plasmodium spp. carriers, from 3.8 to 46.4 %, of whom 84 % were asymptomatic. Thus, overall, 18.7 % of the study population were asymptomatic malaria carriers.

An important malaria reservoir comparable to high transmission areas…

In South America, malaria incidence has decreased in almost all transmission areas since 2000 [1]. Now, many countries aim at malaria elimination. However, Plasmodium spp. prevalence observed by PCR in gold miners in French Guiana is much higher nowadays than in populations from other South American countries: 3 % in the Brazilian Amazon in 2013 [20], 3.9 % for P. vivax, 6.7 % for P. falciparum in Peru in 2015 [21], and 5.8–16.5 % in Colombia in 2013 (asymptomatic carriers) [22]. Moreover, despite the fact that malaria epidemiology on the Guiana Shield is often compared to Southeast Asia [17], the present results were very high compared to the 2.1 and 5.4 % observed in Thailand in 2012 [23] and on the Cambodian border in 2015 [24], respectively. Considering only asymptomatic carriers, the prevalence was 4.9 % in Cambodia in 2013 [25], 3.4 % in Myanmar in 2014 [26] and up to 30.4 % in Bangladesh during the monsoon in 2014 [27]. In a meta-analysis published in 2013 [28], asymptomatic malaria prevalence ranged from 0 to 82 % by PCR throughout the world. Eleven out of 39 studies reported a higher Plasmodium spp. prevalence than in the studied population. These concerned transmission areas in Kenya, Ghana and Congo. Malaria prevalence observed in garimpeiros in French Guiana reaches the high transmission levels observed in Africa, corresponding to a meso-endemic level of transmission.

The heterogeneity of malaria prevalence among the different mining sites highlights the main hotspot of transmission in the Maripa Soula region but all mining sites have some degree of malaria prevalence. The reasons for this difference remain unclear. Entomological investigations on the distribution of Anopheles species present on each site may bring some clues. However, military operations, including mining camp destruction, urge people to move between different mining sites, which could raise malaria prevalence in new areas. It is possible that those observations reflect a situation that might change in time according to human migrations.

…including a large proportion of falciparum cases for South America…

In this study, P. falciparum was predominant (48 vs 37 %, +10 % P. falciparum/P. vivax). This proportion is very high compared to the general frequency of Plasmodium species in French Guiana (33 % P. falciparum vs 66 % P. vivax) [29]. It is also very high when compared to the figures observed in Brazil and in South America in general, where P. vivax mostly predominates. But it reflects the same picture than in gold mining area on the Guiana Shield [1, 11].

…with a high transmission potential…

There is no standard definition of asymptomatic parasitaemia. Many studies considered having no measurable fever at time of inclusion [28], some also required an absence of fever during follow-up, others used different clinical symptoms [20, 30], or excluded people having had anti-malarial treatment before inclusion [27]. Here it was the absence of fever during the last 48 h.

Two main ideas could explain asymptomatic carriage. First, a previous use of anti-malarial drugs can lead to the persistence of parasites at low density, particularly when the treatment course had been inadequate and/or the anti-malarials taken were of poor quality [31]. Second, in areas of high transmission, the exposure to different genetically distinct parasite sub-populations leads to the development of partial immunity allowing asymptomatic parasitaemia [28, 32]. In this study, 17 % of asymptomatic carriers had taken anti-malarials in the past month. Therefore, acquired immunity could explain the 83 % of asymptomatic carriers.

Capability of malaria transmission implies the presence of gametocytes in the blood. In this study, the PCR used did not allow differentiation of sexual from asexual forms, but several studies showed that asymptomatic persons carry gametocytes [20, 28, 32]. Even if the gametocyte density remains unclear, studies showed that asymptomatic patients can infect mosquitoes with an infection rate of 1.2, versus 22 % for symptomatic carriers, in the Amazon basin [33]. A meta-analysis in Africa in 2012 showed that 27.6 % of individuals with sub-microscopic malaria were able to infect mosquitoes, with a mosquito infection rate of 5 % [34]. A 1-year, follow-up study of 347 persons in Ghana using genotyping (to differentiate from re-infection) showed that P. falciparum persisted in the circulation for 194 days on average [35]. Therefore, even if the rate of infection to mosquito is lower with asymptomatic carriers, they carry gametocytes longer than symptomatic patients [26], and could therefore be a major contributor to malaria transmission. The high proportion of asymptomatic carriers in garimpeiros in French Guiana is a threat for transmission of malaria to the neighbouring population on the Guiana Shield and beyond.

…and a potential individual risk

In addition to this public health issue, what is the personal risk of being a Plasmodium spp. carrier? Few studies have followed the clinical evolution of asymptomatic carriers. Differentiating new from asymptomatic infections becoming symptomatic is difficult [28]. A follow-up of patients with genotyping would be required. Without differentiating both, a study in Brazil showed that 17% of asymptomatic carriers became symptomatic within a 6-week follow-up [20].

Implication for public health in French Guiana (France) and in its proximity

Considering the prevalence found in this study and the estimation of the gold-miner population (between 10,000 and 15,000), 1830–3945 persons might be carrying malaria parasites in the forest at a given time. Although the data from the symptomatic cases recorded in the health surveillance system are reassuring, those results suggest that they account for only the tip of the malaria ‘iceberg’. This study demonstrates that garimpeiros in French Guiana are a huge malaria reservoir with a high transmission potential. This leads to two major public health issues: (1) the improper self-medication to treat malaria symptoms raises the threat of artemisinin resistance emergence [17]; and, (2) the high mobility of this population may increase the risk of malaria spreading on the Guiana Shield and beyond, and puts local populations at risk of new malaria outbreaks.

Public health action towards asymptomatic carriers is possible. Massive drug administration (MDA), massive screening and treatment (MSaT) and focused screening and treatment (FSaT) are currently being evaluated throughout the world using molecular tools such as loop-mediated iso-thermal amplification (LAMP) [28, 32, 36, 37]. Far from elimination strategies, French Guiana is on the step of control strategy: track, test, treat (T3), but no implementation of T3 strategy at illegal gold-mining sites is programmed. Moreover, the monodose of primaquine, recommended by WHO to reduce transmission, is not implemented in France due to administrative complexities.

Latitude for public health actions

Malaria in France concerns only French Guiana and Mayotte, a French island in the Indian Ocean, which has a completely different context. No French national plan to control malaria exists. Since the amendment of French health authorities in 2010, Regional Health Agencies (RHAs) have the mandate to implement health policies in their territories. In April 2015, a malaria control strategy was elaborated by the RHA of French Guiana with the support of several malaria experts. This 2015–2018 plan targets a switch to a pre-elimination phase in 2018. However, concerns about malaria at gold-mining sites are poorly addressed and is mainly limited to evaluating the situation [38]. This gap has been justified by: (1) the complexity to access undocumented populations conducting illegal activities in the Amazonian natural reserve; (2) safety concerns at mining sites; (3) the interdiction to diagnose and treat malaria by non-medical doctors in France; and, (4) public opinion against mining activities, and unpopularity of investing in miners’ health. The seriousness of the situation is demonstrated by these points and the issue of malaria transmission among gold miners should be addressed.

Potential public health intervention depending on political will

Several strategies have been discussed for several years at different levels: (1) locally: by the RHA, the prefect (regional state representative), researchers, the French Army Health Department, and healthcare structures; (2) nationally: by the Direction Générale de la Santé, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Home Affairs Ministry, the Overseas Territories Ministry; and, (3) internationally: by representatives of Brazil and Suriname, WHO and Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO), and the Global Fund.

In a first stage, control strategies: “test, treat and track”, provision of impregnated bed nets, and information about the importance of completing treatment could decrease local transmission in mining areas. Innovative strategies have been suggested. Malaria kits for self-diagnosis and treatment could be distributed after a training in resting sites, in collaboration with Suriname and Brazil. These places along the borders are easily accessible and appropriate for implementing public health interventions among garimpeiros, as they have time off and health structures are already in place (malaria clinics in Surinam).

In a second phase, when the local transmission will be lower, further strategies could target asymptomatic carriers in order to avoid malaria spread in the region and in mining sites with low transmission. For example, MDA could target people working in the most infected areas; or the use of LAMP would allow the detection and treatment of asymptomatic carriers.

In July 2015, the French Minister of Health committed to work towards malaria elimination [39], but the practical steps to do this have yet to be taken.

In this trans-border context, the fight against malaria needs a regional approach with involvement of neighbouring Suriname and Brazil, and France can no longer ignore the reality in its territory because the evidence is there: 22.3 % of gold miners carried malaria parasites in the French Guianan forest. A public health response is urgently required.

Conclusions

The prevalence of Plasmodium spp. carriers detected by nested-PCR in illegal gold miners working in French Guiana was very high, 22.3 %, of which 84 % were asymptomatic. Ignoring the burden of the disease in this neglected and mobile population may increase not only the spread of malaria on the Guiana Shield and beyond, but also the risk of emergence of artemisinin resistance, a global threat.

Abbreviations

ACT: 

artemisinin-based combination therapy

CI: 

confidence interval

FSaT: 

focused screening and treating

IR: 

interquartile range

LAMP: 

loop-mediated iso-thermal amplification

MDA: 

massive drug administration

MSaT: 

massive screening and treating

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

RDT: 

rapid diagnostic test

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MDo wrote the protocol, implemented the study, analyzed data and wrote the first draft with the help of MN, LMus and AA. FC and LMut collected the data. LMus, SP, MDe, and JP performed microscopy and PCR. FD, PB, FP, HH, and SV provided technical expertise. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

None.

Availability of data and material

Data will not be shared.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Comité d’Evaluation Ethique de l’Inserm, an Ethics Committee on Research: Process No 14-187 (IRB00003888 FWA00005831). All participants gave a written consent to take part in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was funded by European Funds for Regional Development (Feder), No Presage 32078 and benefited from funding from the Institut Veille Sanitaire (French Ministry of Health). The funding bodies have no role in the study and publication process.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Inserm CIC 1424, Centre d’Investigation Clinique Antilles Guyane, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne
(2)
Equipe EA 3593, Ecosystèmes Amazoniens et Pathologie Tropicale, Université de Guyane
(3)
Laboratoire de Parasitologie, WHO Collaborating Centre for Surveillance of Anti-Malarial Drug Resistance, Centre National de Référence du paludisme, Institut Pasteur de la Guyane
(4)
Laboratoire hospitalo-universitaire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Cayenne Hospital
(5)
Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, Cayenne Hospital
(6)
Centres Délocalisés de Prévention et de Soins, Cayenne Hospital
(7)
Pharmacy, Centre Hospitalier de l’Ouest Guyanais
(8)
Malaria Programme, Ministry of Health
(9)
Foundation of Scientific Research Suriname (SWOS)

References

  1. WHO. Malaria in the World 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Moullet D, Saffache P, Transler A. L'orpaillage en Guyane française: synthèse des connaissances. Etudes caribéennes [en ligne]. Juillet 2006. https://etudescaribeennes.revues.org/753. doi:10.4000/etudescaribeennes.753.
  3. Prefecture of French Guiana. Lutte contre l’orpaillage illégal en Guyane. 04/08/2014.Google Scholar
  4. Niemetzky F, Mosnier E, Nacher M, Stroot J, Brousse P, Pommier de Santi V. Epidémie de Béri-béri chez des orpailleurs en Guyane française. Bulletin de veille sanitaire - Cire Antilles-Guyane. 2015;8–9.Google Scholar
  5. Carvalho L, Mosnier E, Mahamat A, Chappert J, Ledrans M, Ville M, et al. Épidémies multiples dans des camps d’orpaillage en forêt amazonienne (Guyane française). Bulletin de veille sanitaire - Cire Antilles-Guyane. 2015;8–9.Google Scholar
  6. Mouchet J. Le paludisme en Guyane. Cayenne: Conseil Général de Guyane; 1988.Google Scholar
  7. Breeveld FJ, Vreden SG, Grobusch MP. History of malaria research and its contribution to the malaria control success in Suriname: a review. Malar J. 2012;11:95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Hiwat H, Hardjopawiro LS, Takken W, Villegas L. Novel strategies lead to pre-elimination of malaria in previously high-risk areas in Suriname, South America. Malar J. 2012;11:10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Le Fischer J. paludisme: contrôle, élimination et érdication; quelques références historiques. Bulletin de Veille Sanitaire - Cire Antilles-Guyane. 2012;1–2:2–4.Google Scholar
  10. Ardillon V, Eltges F, Chocho A, Chantilly S, Carvalho L, Flamand C, et al. Evolution de la situation épidémiologique du paludisme en Guyane entre 2005 et 2011. Bulletin de Veille Sanitaire - Cire Antilles-Guyane. 2012;1–2:5–11.Google Scholar
  11. Musset L, Pelleau S, Girod R, Ardillon V, Carvalho L, Dusfour I, et al. Malaria on the Guiana Shield: a review of the situation in French Guiana. Mem Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109:525–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Queyriaux B, Texier G, Ollivier L, Galoisy-Guibal L, Michel R, Meynard JB, et al. Plasmodium vivax malaria among military personnel, French Guiana, 1998-2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1280–2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Migliani R, Pradines B, Michel R, Aoun O, Dia A, Deparis X, et al. Malaria control strategies in French armed forces. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2014;12:307–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Verret C, Cabianca B, Haus-Cheymol R, Lafille JJ, Loran-Haranqui G, Spiegel A. Malaria outbreak in troops returning from French Guiana. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1794–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Pommier de Santi V, Dia A, Adde A, Hyvert G, Galant J, Mazevet M, et al. Malaria in French Guiana linked to illegal gold mining. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:344–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Berger F, Flamand C, Musset L, Djossou F, Rosine J, Sanquer MA, et al. Investigation of a sudden malaria outbreak in the isolated Amazonian village of Saul, French Guiana, January–April 2009. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:591–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Nacher M, Guerin PJ, Demar-Pierre M, Djossou F, Nosten F, Carme B. Made in Europe: will artemisinin resistance emerge in French Guiana? Malar J. 2013;12:152.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. WHO. Malaria Microscopy Quality Assurance Manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar
  19. Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Zhu XP, Jarra W, Pinheiro L, do Rosario VE, et al. High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;61:315–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Barbosa S, Gozze AB, Lima NF, Batista CL, Bastos Mda S, Nicolete VC, et al. Epidemiology of disappearing Plasmodium vivax malaria: a case study in rural Amazonia. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis. 2014;8:e3109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosas-Aguirre A, Speybroeck N, Llanos-Cuentas A, Rosanas-Urgell A, Carrasco-Escobar G, Rodriguez H, et al. Hotspots of malaria transmission in the Peruvian Amazon: rapid assessment through a parasitological and serological survey. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0137458.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Cucunuba ZM, Guerra A, Rivera JA, Nicholls RS. Comparison of asymptomatic Plasmodium spp. infection in two malaria-endemic Colombian locations. Trans R Soc TropMed Hyg. 2013;107:129–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogawski ET, Congpuong K, Sudathip P, Satimai W, Sug-aram R, Aruncharus S, et al. Active case detection with pooled real-time PCR to eliminate malaria in Trat province, Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:789–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Edwards HM, Canavati SE, Rang C, Ly P, Sovannaroth S, Canier L, et al. Novel cross-border approaches to optimise identification of asymptomatic and artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium infection in mobile populations crossing Cambodian borders. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0124300.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Canier L, Khim N, Kim S, Sluydts V, Heng S, Dourng D, et al. An innovative tool for moving malaria PCR detection of parasite reservoir into the field. Malar J. 2013;12:405.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang B, Han SS, Cho C, Han JH, Cheng Y, Lee SK, et al. Comparison of microscopy, nested-PCR, and Real-Time-PCR assays using high-throughput screening of pooled samples for diagnosis of malaria in asymptomatic carriers from areas of endemicity in Myanmar. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:1838–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Starzengruber P, Fuehrer HP, Ley B, Thriemer K, Swoboda P, Habler VE, et al. High prevalence of asymptomatic malaria in south-eastern Bangladesh. Malar J. 2014;13:16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindblade KA, Steinhardt L, Samuels A, Kachur SP, Slutsker L. The silent threat: asymptomatic parasitemia and malaria transmission. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2013;11:623–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ardillon V, Carvalho L, Prince C, Abboud P, Djossou F. Etat des lieux de la situation épidémiologique du paludisme en 2013-2014 en Guyane. Bulletin de Veille Sanitaire - Cire Antilles-Guyane. 2015;1:16–20.Google Scholar
  30. Nankabirwa J, Wandera B, Kiwanuka N, Staedke SG, Kamya MR, Brooker SJ. Asymptomatic Plasmodium infection and cognition among primary schoolchildren in a high malaria transmission setting in Uganda. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:1102–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Pribluda VS, Evans L 3rd, Barillas E, Marmion J, Lukulay P, Chang J. Were medicine quality and pharmaceutical management contributing factors in diminishing artemisinin efficacy in Guyana and Suriname? Malar J. 2014;13:77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Bousema T, Okell L, Felger I, Drakeley C. Asymptomatic malaria infections: detectability, transmissibility and public health relevance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:833–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Alves FP, Gil LH, Marrelli MT, Ribolla PE, Camargo EP, Da Silva LH. Asymptomatic carriers of Plasmodium spp. as infection source for malaria vector mosquitoes in the Brazilian Amazon. J Med Entomol. 2005;42:777–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bousema T, Dinglasan RR, Morlais I, Gouagna LC, van Warmerdam T, Awono-Ambene PH, et al. Mosquito feeding assays to determine the infectiousness of naturally infected Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriers. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e42821.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Felger I, Maire M, Bretscher MT, Falk N, Tiaden A, Sama W, et al. The dynamics of natural Plasmodium falciparum infections. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45542.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hopkins H, Gonzalez IJ, Polley SD, Angutoko P, Ategeka J, Asiimwe C, et al. Highly sensitive detection of malaria parasitemia in a malaria-endemic setting: performance of a new loop-mediated isothermal amplification kit in a remote clinic in Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:645–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Aydin-Schmidt B, Xu W, Gonzalez IJ, Polley SD, Bell D, Shakely D, et al. Loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) accurately detects malaria DNA from filter paper blood samples of low density parasitaemias. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103905.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Health Regional Agency of French Guiana. Plan de lutte contre le paludisme en Guyane; Contrôle du paludisme sur l’ensemble du territoire 2015-2018. 2015. http://www.ars.guyane.sante.fr/fileadmin/GUYANE/fichiers/Votre_sante/Veille_sanitaire/plan_palu_final_v4.pdf.
  39. Touraine M. Speech by Marisol Touraine, Minister of Social Affairs, Health and Women’s Rights to Franco- Brazilian Audience Health; 07/24/2015; Brazilia 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement