Open Access

Low prevalence of Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale mono-infections among children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a population-based, cross-sectional study

  • Stephanie M. Doctor1,
  • Yunhao Liu2,
  • Olivia G. Anderson1,
  • Amy N. Whitesell1,
  • Melchior Kashamuka Mwandagalirwa1, 3,
  • Jérémie Muwonga4,
  • Corinna Keeler5,
  • Michael Emch1, 5,
  • Joris L. Likwela6,
  • Antoinette Tshefu3 and
  • Steven R. Meshnick1Email author
Malaria Journal201615:350

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1409-0

Received: 6 April 2016

Accepted: 21 June 2016

Published: 8 July 2016

Abstract

Background

In an effort to improve surveillance for epidemiological and clinical outcomes, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have become increasingly widespread as cost-effective and field-ready methods of malaria diagnosis. However, there are concerns that using RDTs specific to Plasmodium falciparum may lead to missed detection of other malaria species such as Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale.

Methods

Four hundred and sixty six samples were selected from children under 5 years old in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) who took part in a Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) in 2013–14. These samples were first tested for all Plasmodium species using an 18S ribosomal RNA-targeted real-time PCR; malaria-positive samples were then tested for P. falciparum, P. malariae and P. ovale using a highly sensitive nested PCR.

Results

The prevalence of P. falciparum, P. malariae and P. ovale were 46.6, 12.9 and 8.3 %, respectively. Most P. malariae and P. ovale infections were co-infected with P. falciparum—the prevalence of mono-infections of these species were only 1.0 and 0.6 %, respectively. Six out of these eight mono-infections were negative by RDT. The prevalence of P. falciparum by the more sensitive nested PCR was higher than that found previously by real-time PCR.

Conclusions

Plasmodium malariae and P. ovale remain endemic at a low rate in the DRC, but the risk of missing malarial infections of these species due to falciparum-specific RDT use is low. The observed prevalence of P. falciparum is higher with a more sensitive PCR method.

Keywords

Plasmodium malariae Plasmodium ovale Democratic Republic of the Congo Rapid diagnostic test

Background

Malaria remains a severe global burden, causing an estimated 214 million cases and 438,000 deaths in 2015 [1], a toll that is particularly high in sub-Saharan Africa. Efforts to control malaria depend on diagnostic accuracy and availability, and in recent years the demand for rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) has been increasingly high. RDTs detect malaria antigens in the blood using immunochromatography. They provide an easy-to-use alternative to microscopy, which requires skilled experts to be optimally effective [2, 3], and a cost-effective and field-ready alternative to PCR, which is more sensitive [4] but requires expensive equipment.

Among the most widely used RDTs are those that detect Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2). These RDTs are sensitive and specific for parasitaemias above 200 per µl blood [5]. RDTs that use the Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) antigen are designed to detect all species of malaria, but are less sensitive [68].

In sub-Saharan Africa, where the vast majority of malaria infections are due to P. falciparum [1], RDTs detecting PfHRP2 are most commonly used. However, mono-infections with non-falciparum malarias (primarily Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale in sub-Saharan Africa) may go undetected. In this study, a sub-set of samples from a nationally representative, cross-sectional study of children under age 5 years in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) were used to determine the prevalence of P. malariae and P. ovale mixed and mono-infections, and to assess the risk of missed detection due to the use of falciparum-specific RDTs.

Methods

Survey methodology and sample collection

The 2013–14 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) was a cluster-based household survey in the DRC, which took place between November 2013 and February 2014. As part of the survey, blood samples collected from children under 5 years of age were analysed for malaria infection, without speciation, by light microscopy. The samples were also tested with an RDT targeting PfHRP2 (SD Bioline Malaria Ag P.f., Standard Diagnostics, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) and used to make dried blood spots (DBS). From DBS, DNA was extracted and tested for P. falciparum infection using a real-time PCR assay targeting the P. falciparum lactate dehydrogenase (pfldh) gene as previously described [9, 10]. This research was approved by institutional review boards at the Kinshasa School of Public Health and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Informed consent was obtained from a parent or responsible adult for all subjects.

Samples for this study were randomly chosen from four strata: (1) microscopy-positive, pfldh PCR-negative; (2) microscopy-negative, pfldh PCR-negative; (3) microscopy-positive, pfldh PCR-positive; and, (4) microscopy-negative, pfldh PCR-positive (Table 1). To detect a prevalence of 1 % (0, 2, 95 % confidence interval), the minimum sample size was estimated as 362 [11].
Table 1

Sampling strata used in this study

Strata

Total size

Sampled

Fraction (%)

Microscopy+/PCR−

216

15

6.9

Microscopy−/PCR−

4169

301

7.2

Microscopy+/PCR+

1695

89

5.3

Microscopy−/PCR+

1057

61

5.8

Total

7137

466

6.5

All-Plasmodium real-time PCR assay

Samples that initially tested negative by pfldh PCR underwent a real-time PCR assay that detects all species of Plasmodium, targeting the gene encoding the small sub-unit (18S) of the ribosomal RNA gene (heretofore referred to as “All Plasmodium qPCR”). Primer and probe sequences, reaction mixture and cycling conditions for this assay were previously published [12] with the exception that Probe Master qPCR Mix (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used (Additional file 1: Table S1). Each sample was tested in duplicate. A sample was considered positive for Plasmodium if both of its replicates amplified or if one replicate amplified with a cycle threshold (CT) value lower than 38.

Speciation by BLAST

Samples that tested positive in the All Plasmodium qPCR assay were speciated using Sanger sequencing and BLAST. DNA was amplified by nested PCR of Plasmodium 18S rDNA as previously described [13], with the outer primers rPLU1 and rPLU5 and the inner, genus-specific primers rPLU3 and rPLU4. Primer sequences and reaction conditions are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Products from this nested PCR were Sanger sequenced (Eton Bioscience, Durham, NC, USA) and queried in the BLAST database (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, USA). If a sequence produced a result with at least 50 % query cover and 94 % identity, it was identified as the species with the best match. Otherwise, if a result produced 10 % query cover and 80 % identity, the cleanest part of the sequence, as determined by the authors, was resubmitted to BLAST and if this search fulfilled the initial criteria the species was defined. All sequences that did not produce such a match were labelled ‘indeterminate’ by this method.

Speciation by species-specific nested PCR

Samples that were malaria-positive by either the pfldh qPCR or the All Plasmodium qPCR were tested using species-specific nested PCR as in [13]. The Round 1 reaction used the same primers as used in the genus-specific nested PCR but with Qiagen HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Separate Round 2 reactions were run for P. falciparum (primers rFAL1 and rFAL2), P. malariae (rMAL1 and rMAL2), and P. ovale (rOVA1 and rOVA2) (see Additional file 1: Table S1). The PCR products from each speciation reaction were analysed by gel electrophoresis on a 3 % agarose gel to determine positivity for each species in each sample. Samples that did not amplify for any of the three species were labelled ‘indeterminate’ by this method.

The species of each sample was determined based on results from nested PCR. If a sample was indeterminate by nested PCR, the BLAST result was used instead. If the BLAST result was also indeterminate, the sample was removed from the analysis.

Analysis

Data were entered and analysed in Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Weighted prevalence were calculated as follows: for each stratum the proportion of positive samples in the sub-set was multiplied by the number of samples in the stratum. The sum of these was divided by the total number of samples.

Results

Study population

There were 7137 children under 5 years old with known pfldh PCR, microscopy and RDT results. Of these, a total of 466 samples (6.5 %) were chosen from the four strata listed in Table 1 for use in this study. A sample flow diagram is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1.

All Plasmodium qPCR

Among the 316 samples that were negative by pfldh PCR, 52 samples were malaria-positive by the All Plasmodium qPCR assay—nine microscopy-positive and 43 microscopy-negative. Including these and 150 samples that were positive by pfldh PCR, a total of 202 malaria-positive samples was analysed for speciation. Out of these, four (2.0 %) were indeterminate (Table 2), giving an analysable population of 198 malaria-positive samples and 462 total samples.
Table 2

Results of All Plasmodium qPCR and speciation of malaria-positive samples by stratum

 

Microscopy+

pfldh PCR−

Microscopy−

pfldh PCR−

Microscopy+

pfldh PCR+

Microscopy−

pfldh PCR+

Total

All Plasmodium qPCR

Negative

6

258

264

Positive

9

43

89

61

202

Species-specific PCR

P. falciparum only

4

24

48

49

125

P. malariae only

0

5

0

0

5

P. ovale only

1

2

0

0

3

P. falciparum + P. malariae

4

2

23

5

34

P. falciparum + P. ovale

0

7

9

2

18

P. falciparum + P. malariae + P. ovale

0

0

9

4

13

Mono-infections + Mixed

P. falciparum total

8

33

89

60

190

P. malariae total

4

7

32

9

52

P. ovale total

1

9

18

6

34

Indeterminate

0

3

0

1

4

Total

15

301

89

61

466

Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum

Of 198 malaria-positive samples, 190 (96.0 %) were positive for P. falciparum, giving a weighted prevalence in the survey sample set of 46.6 % (95 % CI 44.4–48.9 %) (Table 2). This is slightly higher than the prevalence of 38.6 % by the initial PCR test (pfldh) [10].

Prevalence of Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale

Of 198 samples, 52 (26.3 %) were positive for P. malariae and 34 (17.2 %) were positive for P. ovale, giving weighted prevalence of 12.9 % (95 % CI 10.0–15.9 %) and 8.3 % (95 % CI 5.7–10.8 %), respectively (Table 2). Geographical distributions of P. malariae and P. ovale infections are shown in Fig. 1. Both P. malariae and P. ovale infections are widely distributed. Eighty-nine percent of individuals with P. malariae or P. ovale infection were also infected with P. falciparum.
Fig. 1

Geographical distribution of Plasmodium malariae (a) and Plasmodium ovale (b) cases by DHS cluster. For each cluster, the size of the black dot represents the number of cases tested (out of a total 462) and the size of the red dot represents the number of positive P. malariae (a) or P. ovale (b) cases

Five P. malariae mono-infections and three P. ovale mono-infections were found, giving weighted prevalence of 1.0 % (95 % CI 0.1–1.8 %) and 0.6 % (95 % CI 0–1.3 %), respectively. Of these eight non-P. falciparum mono-infections, six (75.0 %) were negative by RDT.

Discussion

Using a sub-set of 462 samples from the large, cross-sectional DHS, the prevalence of P. malariae and P. ovale among children in the DRC was found to be 12.9 and 8.3 %, respectively, with widespread geographical distributions seen in both species. A recent study of children in Western Kasai, DRC found a similar prevalence of P. malariae (13.8 %) but a lower prevalence of P. ovale (2.4 %) [14], and another study of asymptomatic individuals in six provinces of the DRC found a much lower prevalence of P. malariae (1.0 %) [15]. In 2007 prevalence were 4.9 % for P. malariae and 0.6 % for P. ovale [16]. In general, prevalence found here are higher than those reported in other African countries for P. malariae [1720] and P. ovale [17, 18, 21]. However, all of these differences could be due to normal geographic and temporal variations as well as differences in the PCR and sampling methods.

Mono-infections of P. malariae and P. ovale appear to be rare in the DRC. In this study, the mono-infection prevalence were only 1.0 and 0.6 %, respectively. In Western Kasai, there were no P. malariae or P. ovale mono-infections reported [14].

Because HRP2-based RDTs detect P. falciparum only, they can result in missed detection of P. malariae and P. ovale mono-infections. Of the eight mono-infections found here, six were negative by RDT. The remaining two were likely recently cleared P. falciparum infections in which the HRP2 antigen was still present, as it can remain in the blood stream for up to 1 month after parasite clearance [22]. Overall, the number of non-falciparum infections missed by the RDT was small as most such cases were co-infections with P. falciparum.

Of 316 samples that were initially negative by pfldh PCR, 52 amplified P. falciparum 18S rDNA by nested species-specific PCR. As a result, the PCR prevalence using both tests was higher (46.6 %) than found using a single test (38.6 %). This is likely because the 18S rDNA assay has a lower threshold of detection. Thus, caution must be used when comparing prevalence rates determined using different PCR and survey methodologies.

Conclusions

Plasmodium falciparum remains the most prevalent species of malaria in the DRC, but P. malariae and P. ovale are endemic at a low rate. While RDTs have limitations, the results presented here suggest that the risk of missing malarial infections because they are mono-infections of P. malariae and P. ovale is low. However, the development of new RDTs to cover non-falciparum malaria will improve efforts at elimination.

Abbreviations

RDT: 

rapid diagnostic test

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

PfHRP2: 

Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein II

pLDH: 

Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase

DHS: 

demographic and health survey

DRC: 

Democratic Republic of the Congo

DBS: 

dried blood spots

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MK, JM, JLL and AT conducted field and laboratory work to obtain samples. SMD and SRM conceived and designed the experiments. SMD, OGA and ANW performed the PCR assays. SMD, YL and SRM analysed the data. SMD, CK and ME created the Figures and Tables. SMD and SRM wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors revised it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the administrators of the 2013–2014 DRC DHS and the participants of this study, without whom this work would not have been possible.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Sharing of individual-level raw data is not permitted under current Institutional Review Board approvals.

Consent for publication

All authors have approved the final draft, contributed to it significantly and commensurate with their status as co-authors, and agree with the decision to seek publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was approved by institutional review boards at the Kinshasa School of Public Health and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Informed consent was obtained from a parent or responsible adult for all subjects.

Funding

National Institutes of Health (grant 5R01AI107949 to SRM) and National Science Foundation (Grant BSC-1339949 to ME). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina
(2)
Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina
(3)
Ecole de Santé Publique, Faculté de Medecine, Université de Kinshasa
(4)
Programme National de Lutte contre le SIDA et les IST
(5)
Department of Geography, University of North Carolina
(6)
Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme

References

  1. WHO. World malaria report 2015. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Mwingira F, Genton B, Kabanywanyi AN, Felger I. Comparison of detection methods to estimate asexual Plasmodium falciparum parasite prevalence and gametocyte carriage in a community survey in Tanzania. Malar J. 2014;13:433.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Kilian AH, Metzger WG, Mutschelknauss EJ, Kabagambe G, Langi P, Korte R, et al. Reliability of malaria microscopy in epidemiological studies: results of quality control. Trop Med Int Health. 2000;5:3–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kamau E, Tolbert LS, Kortepeter L, Pratt M, Nyakoe N, Muringo L, et al. Development of a highly sensitive genus-specific quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time PCR assay for detection and quantitation of Plasmodium by amplifying RNA and DNA of the 18S rRNA genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2946–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. WHO. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: Round 5 (2013). World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2014.Google Scholar
  6. Ashley EA, Touabi M, Ahrer M, Hutagalung R, Htun K, Luchavez J, et al. Evaluation of three parasite lactate dehydrogenase-based rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of falciparum and vivax malaria. Malar J. 2009;8:241.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Heutmekers M, Gillet P, Cnops L, Bottieau E, Van Esbroeck M, Maltha J, et al. Evaluation of the malaria rapid diagnostic test SDFK90: detection of both PfHRP2 and Pf-pLDH. Malar J. 2012;11:359.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Hendriksen IC, Mtove G, Pedro AJ, Gomes E, Silamut K, Lee SJ, et al. Evaluation of a PfHRP2 and a pLDH-based rapid diagnostic test for the diagnosis of severe malaria in 2 populations of African children. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:1100–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Ministère du Plan et Suivi de la Mise en oeuvre de la Révolution de la Modernité MdlSP, ICF International. Enquête Démographique et de Santé en République Démocratique du Congo 2013–2014. Rockville: MPSMRM, MSP et ICF International. 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Doctor SM, Liu Y, Whitesell A, Thwai KL, Taylor SM, Janko M, et al. Malaria surveillance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: comparison of microscopy, PCR, and rapid diagnostic test. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85:16–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dean AG SK, Soe MM. OpenEpi: Open source epidemiologic statistics for public health (2015). www.openepi.com. Accessed 17 June 2016.
  12. Taylor SM, Juliano JJ, Trottman PA, Griffin JB, Landis SH, Kitsa P, et al. High-throughput pooling and real-time PCR-based strategy for malaria detection. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:512–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Singh B, Bobogare A, Cox-Singh J, Snounou G, Abdullah MS, Rahman HA. A genus- and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60:687–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gabrielli S, Bellina L, Milardi GL, Katende BK, Totino V, Fullin V, et al. Malaria in children of Tshimbulu (Western Kasai, Democratic Republic of the Congo): epidemiological data and accuracy of diagnostic assays applied in a limited resource setting. Malar J. 2016;15:81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Mvumbi DM, Bobanga TL, Melin P, De Mol P, Kayembe JM, Situakibanza HN, et al. High prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum infection in asymptomatic individuals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Malar Res Treat. 2016;2016:5405802.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Taylor SM, Messina JP, Hand CC, Juliano JJ, Muwonga J, Tshefu AK, et al. Molecular malaria epidemiology: mapping and burden estimates for the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2007. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16420.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Williams J, Njie F, Cairns M, Bojang K, Coulibaly SO, Kayentao K, et al. Non-falciparum malaria infections in pregnant women in West Africa. Malaria J. 2016;15:53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sitali L, Chipeta J, Miller JM, Moonga HB, Kumar N, Moss WJ, et al. Patterns of mixed Plasmodium species infections among children six years and under in selected malaria hyper-endemic communities of Zambia: population-based survey observations. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:204.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Geiger C, Agustar HK, Compaore G, Coulibaly B, Sie A, Becher H, et al. Declining malaria parasite prevalence and trends of asymptomatic parasitaemia in a seasonal transmission setting in North-Western Burkina Faso between 2000 and 2009–2012. Malar J. 2013;12:27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Pullan RL, Bukirwa H, Staedke SG, Snow RW, Brooker S. Plasmodium infection and its risk factors in eastern Uganda. Malar J. 2010;9:2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Oguike MC, Betson M, Burke M, Nolder D, Stothard JR, Kleinschmidt I, et al. Plasmodium ovale curtisi and Plasmodium ovale wallikeri circulate simultaneously in African communities. Int J Parasitol. 2011;41:677–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Abeku TA, Kristan M, Jones C, Beard J, Mueller DH, Okia M, et al. Determinants of the accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests in malaria case management: evidence from low and moderate transmission settings in the East African highlands. Malar J. 2008;7:202.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement