Open Access

Genetic diversity of the Pvk12 gene in Plasmodium vivax from the China-Myanmar border area

Contributed equally
Malaria Journal201615:528

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1592-z

Received: 30 August 2016

Accepted: 28 October 2016

Published: 4 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin emerged in the Greater Mekong Sub-region has been associated with mutations in the propeller domain of the kelch gene Pfk13.

Methods

Here the polymorphisms in Pvk12 gene, the orthologue of Pfk13 in Plasmodium vivax, were determined by PCR and sequencing in 262 clinical isolates collected in recent years (2012–2015) from the China-Myanmar border area.

Results

Sequencing of full-length Pvk12 genes from these isolates identified three synonymous mutations (N172N, S360S, S697S) and one non-synonymous mutation M124I, all of which were at very low prevalence (2.0–3.1%). Moreover, these mutations were non-overlapping between the two study sites on both sides of the border. Molecular evolutionary analysis detected signature of purifying selection on Pvk12.

Conclusions

There is no direct evidence that Pvk12 is involved in artemisinin resistance in P. vivax, but it remains a potential candidate requiring further investigation. Continuous monitoring of potential drug resistance in this parasite is needed in order to facilitate the regional malaria elimination campaign.

Keywords

Malaria Plasmodium vivax Pvk12 genePolymorphismMolecular surveillance

Background

Although global malaria incidence and death rates have decreased in recent years, malaria remains one of the biggest threats to populations living within the tropical and sub-tropical world. In the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) of Southeast Asia, a regional malaria elimination plan has been endorsed, aiming to eliminate Plasmodium falciparum malaria by 2025 and all malaria by 2030 [1]. This ambitious goal is met with challenges, especially the recently developed artemisinin resistance among P. falciparum populations in this region [24]. Further complication of the situation results from the increasing prevalence of Plasmodium vivax in this region, a parasite that is resilient to current control measures [5]. Although chloroquine (CQ) remains the primary treatment option for P. vivax infections, the emergence of CQ resistance has led to the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for the treatment of vivax malaria in Indonesia [6]. Monitoring drug resistance in P. vivax populations is important for eliminating all malaria from the GMS.

In regions co-endemic for P. falciparum and P. vivax, both species can share the same vectors and human hosts, and are often subject to similar forces of natural selection [7, 8]. Several studies showed that anti-malarial drug pressure induces strong selection on both parasite species [9, 10]. It is thus assumed that the widespread use of ACT for treating P. falciparum infection may exert similar collateral selective pressure on P. vivax populations. Recently, mutations in the propeller domain of the Pfk13 gene have been incriminated as important determinants of artemisinin resistance in P. falciparum [1113]. Although ACT is still highly efficacious for treating vivax malaria [14, 15], vigilance is required on potential emergence of resistance in this parasite [16]. A recent study aiming to determine whether similar mutations mediating artemisinin resistance are also present in the Pfk13 orthologue in P. vivax (here named Pvk12 gene as this gene is located on chromosome 12) found that parasites with a Pvk12 mutation (V552I) was circulating in Cambodia at a very low frequency [17]. To further examine the genetic diversity of this gene in the GMS, recent collections of clinical isolates of P. vivax from both sides of the China-Myanmar border were examined. This region has a very long history of artemisinin deployment and there is an indication that CQ efficacy for treating P. vivax malaria is decreasing [18]. Here Pvk12 genes in 262 P. vivax parasite isolates were sequenced and molecular evolution analyses were performed to determine whether this gene is subject to potential selection.

Methods

Collection of parasite clinical isolates

Plasmodium vivax samples were collected from malaria patients with acute P. vivax infections attending malaria clinics located on both sides of the China-Myanmar border. Plasmodium vivax infection was diagnosed by microscopy of Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood films. A total of 162 samples were obtained from 13 clinics around Laiza township, Kachin State, Myanmar during the high transmission season (June to September) in 2015. One-hundred samples were collected in 2012–2013 from Tengchong County, Yunnan Province, China. The standard treatment for P. vivax malaria is CQ (25 mg/kg, divided into three days) and primaquine (0.25 mg/kg/day for 14 days in Kachin State; 0.375 mg/kg/day for 8 days in Yunnan Province) [19]. On both sides of the border, malaria transmission has been reduced in recent years [20, 21]. Especially, P. falciparum malaria incidence has experienced a sharp decline [22, 23], possibly due to the extensive use of ACT. To collect finger-prick blood on filter papers, written informed consent was obtained from the participants or their guardians. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kunming Medical University.

DNA extraction, gene amplification and sequencing analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted using the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche, Germany) and eluted in 50 µl of H2O. Parasite samples were genotyped by PCR/RFLP of two polymorphic genes msp3α and msp3β to distinguish single from mixed-strain infections [24, 25]. Only infections containing single P. vivax strains by genotyping were used for sequencing analysis. The full-length Pvk12 gene was amplified by nested PCR using 2X TSINGKE™ Master Mix (Beijing Tsingke Biotech, China) containing high-fidelity Pfu DNA polymerase with outer primers K13P1F (5′-CCATACTGGCTGCACCTGCTT-3′) and K13P1R (5′-GTAGTGGCAGTGGAGGAGAG-3′), and nested primers K13P2F (5′-CCACGGAACAGATGAATCTTC-3′) and K13P2R (5′-AAACCCGAGAAAGTTGTAGCA-3′). PCR reactions were performed in 25 with 1 µl DNA template, 0.5 μM of each primer, 12.5 μl Master Mix, and 10.5 μl H2O. For the primary reaction the following cycling parameters were used: 5 min at 94 °C, 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 63 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 90 s, and final extension for 7 min at 72 °C. For nested PCR, 1 μl primary PCR product was used as template and the following cycling parameters were used: 5 min at 94 °C, 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 90 s, and final extension for 7 min at 72 °C. Sequencing was performed on both strands and sequences were assembled by using DNASTAR (WI, USA) with manual editing. Alignment of DNA sequences were performed using MEGA 6.0 [26] and BioEdit (version 7.2.5) with the Pvk12 sequence of Salvador I (Sal-I) genome (PVX_083080) as the reference. The five haplotypes of Pvk12 gene derived from this study have been submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers (KX961684–KX961688).

Molecular evolutionary analysis of Pvk12

A total of 333 full-length Pvk12 sequences were analysed, of which 262 samples were from the current study. The remaining 71 sequences including four from Oceania, 11 from North America, one from Africa, 34 from South America, and 21 from Southeast Asia were downloaded from PlasmoDB [27], as a result from the P. vivax hybrid selection sequencing project [28]. The sequences were aligned with the Sal-I reference sequence using ClustalW implemented in MEGA 6.0. SNP information was used to generate haplotypes and to calculate haplotype diversity. To determine the genetic diversity of Pvk12 gene, the average pairwise nucleotide diversity (π) and the average number of segregating sites (θ) were calculated. To detect signatures of natural selection, the number of non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site (dN) and synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (dS) were estimated. A codon-based Z test was performed to calculate possible departure from neutrality with the variance of difference between dN and dS being computed by the bootstrap method with 500 replicates [29]. This neutrality test was further corroborated using Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs tests. All molecular evolution tests were performed using MEGA 6.0. Pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) was also used to determine the degree of random association between different mutations within this gene. The correlation coefficient (R 2 ) between paired alleles was estimated using DNASP v5.0 and Arlequin 3.5, and the significance of each association was determined using the χ2 test after Bonferroni correction.

Results

Genetic diversity of Pvk12 from the two geographical regions

Two hundred and sixty two full-length Pvk12 sequences (2139 bp) in parasite samples from two regions along the China-Myanmar border were obtained. Compared with the Sal-I reference sequence, one synonymous SNP at nucleotide 2091 was observed in five (3.1%) isolates from the Kachin samples, while two different synonymous SNPs at nucleotide 516 and 1080, respectively, were identified in four (2%) isolates from the Tengchong samples (Table 1; Fig. 1). In addition, one non-synonymous mutation, M124I, was found in two isolates from Tengchong, whereas no non-synonymous mutation was identified in the Kachin samples. Altogether, the frequency of parasites containing Pvk12 mutations was very low, making up of only 4.2%. In comparison, 71 downloaded Pvk12 sequences were all the same as the wild type reference sequence. Consistent with this result, genetic diversity of Pvk12 gene represented by the π and θ values was extremely low for the China-Myanmar border samples (Table 2). Similarly, only five haplotypes were observed with the wild type as the predominant. Among the parasite isolates from Tengchong, four haplotypes were observed, giving a haplotype diversity of 0.116. The haplotypes of these two regions were completely different without overlap. Except for the wild type, other haplotypes containing single mutations all were very rare. Furthermore, pairwise LD analysis revealed no significant associations between different alleles (see Additional files 1, 2; P > 0.05, χ2 test).
Table 1

Prevalence of point mutations in the Pvk12 gene of Plasmodium vivax isolates from the two regions along the China-Myanmar border

Point mutations

Prevalence [N (%)]

Nucleotide

Amino acid

Kachin (N = 162)

Tengchong (N = 100)

G372A

M124I

2 (2.0%)

C516T

N172N

2 (2.0%)

C1080T

S360S

2 (2.0%)

C2091T

S697S

5 (3.1%)

Fig. 1

Example chromatograms of the Pvk12 gene showing synonymous mutations at nucleotide positions 516, 1080 and 2091, and non-synonymous mutations at position 372. Included are the Pvk12 sequences in the Sal-I strain and parasite isolates TV105, TV133, TV29 and LZCH-1493

Table 2

Genetic diversity and summary statistics of Pvk12 gene

Regions

No. isolates

H

θ

π

dN–dS

Tajima’s D

Fu’s Fs

Kachin

162

2

0.000083

0.000028

−1.071

−0.69076

−0.91123

Tengchong

100

4

0.000271

0.000056

−1.275

−1.42652*

−3.88033*

Total

262

5

0.000304

0.000039

−1.579

−1.49534*

−6.52209*

H number of haplotypes

P < 0.05

Signature of purifying selection

Several molecular evolutionary analyses were performed to assess the role of natural selection on Pvk12. When all samples were combined, both Tajima’s D and Fu and Li’s Fs were significantly deviated from neutrality (Table 2) and suggested of purifying selection. The dN–dS analysis also showed higher prevalence of synonymous than non-synonymous mutations, albeit the value was not statistically significant. Interestingly, when samples from the two regions were analysed separately, purifying selection on this gene was only evident in isolates from Tengchong, China (Table 2). Although the Tajima’s D and Fu and Li’s F values for the Kachin samples did not reach significance, they had the same trend as for the Tengchong samples.

Discussion

Mutations in the propeller domain of Pfk13 gene have been associated with artemisinin resistance in P. falciparum, which is manifested as delayed parasite clearance after artemisinin treatment [11, 12]. A recent analysis of worldwide P. falciparum populations identified numerous non-synonymous mutations with marked geographic disparity in their frequency and distribution, which may reflect the demographic history of the parasite populations and different drug use histories [30]. In sharp contrast, studies conducted to date in the GMS, where artemisinin resistance has emerged in P. falciparum, showed a highly conserved Pvk12 gene [17, 31]. In Cambodia where Pfk13 mutations were highly prevalent, analysis of 284 P. vivax isolates identified only two isolates with a non-synonymous mutation, V552I [17], although these parasites may have been exposed to higher drug selection pressure. Similarly, analysis of 66 P. vivax samples from central China identified a G581R mutation in one sample (Wang et al. unpublished). In comparison, this analysis of 262 full-length Pvk12 sequences only identified that two parasite isolates (2%) collected from Yunnan’s Tenchong County contained a non-synonymous mutation, M124I, which is located near the N-terminal region. Thus, mutations identified here, being outside of the propeller domain, are unlikely involved in artemisinin resistance even if Pvk12 is presumed to play an analogous role to Pfk13 in resistance. Furthermore, although the recent genomic studies of world P. vivax populations identified five non-synonymous mutations in Pvk12 (N25I, S253T, V552I, V652L, and A710E) in 228 samples, all of these mutations were rare mutations [31]. Specifically, the N25I mutation was identified only in 2% of the western Thai samples (N = 89), whereas the S253T mutation was found only in 8% of the Papua Indonesia samples (N = 55), and each of the three other mutations was present only in one sample. Though some of these mutations are located in the propeller domain, their functions still need to be evaluated individually as mutations within the propeller domains such as A578S in Pfk13 may not necessarily be associated with artemisinin resistance [12].

The observed deficiency of mutations in the Pvk12 gene is in sharp contrast to Pfk13 from the sympatric P. falciparum populations [11, 30]. While it is unknown whether Pvk12 and Pfk13 are functionally equivalent, the high level of conservation of Pvk12 suggests that (1) Pvk12 may play a different role in parasite biology even if Pvk12 has a similar function to Pfk13 and its conservation is maintained by functional constraints (purifying selection) and, (2) if Pvk12 is involved in artemisinin resistance, the different mutation rates in Pfk13 and Pvk12 may suggest different drug selection pressures on these two parasites. Likewise, there is evidence that pfk13 is under natural selection as non-synonymous mutations exceed synonymous mutations [32]. In contrast, Pvk12 appears to be under purifying selection, though the limited polymorphisms at four positions of Pvk12 in 11 of 262 samples analyzed here preclude a robust evolutionary analysis. To date the functions of Plasmodium k13 orthologues are still unknown, but their similarity in sequence to the human KEAP1 protein, which is involved in the regulation of the antioxidant responses [33], suggest that they might have similar functions. In P. falciparum, it was found that the Pfk13 is linked to the phosphotidylinositol-3-phosphate kinase (PI3K) pathway and artemisinin-conferring Pfk13 mutations are associated with increased PI3K activity and higher levels of the product phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate [34]. If a similar pathway linking k13 and PI3K works in both parasite species, drug selections may be imposed on different enzymes within the same pathway. Interestingly, divergent selections have been identified on the phosphoinositide-dependent kinase PDK-1 among P. vivax populations, an enzyme participating in the PI3K pathway [28]. It is unknown whether this observation suggests that artemisinin family drugs might have acted on the PvPDK-1 gene instead of Pvk12 gene in P. vivax. It is also possible that the highly conserved Pvk12 gene among worldwide P. vivax populations may suggest that Pvk12 may have nothing to do with artemisinin resistance, like that the pvcrt-o gene is not a major player in CQ resistance in P. vivax as compared to the critical role of its orthologue pfcrt in mediating CQ resistance in P. falciparum.

Mutations within Pvk12, though rare, displayed quite significant geographical disparities. Three different non-synonymous mutations have been identified in parasite populations from different parts of the GMS [17, 31]. Considering evidence of independent emergence of artemisinin resistance-conferring Pfk13 mutations in different areas of the GMS [35], this difference in Pvk12 may indicate different demographic histories and the presence of gene flow barriers among these parasite populations. It could also reflect different drug use histories for P. falciparum malaria, which may have exerted collateral selection on P. vivax, given that the front-line treatment for P. vivax malaria in most GMS countries remains as CQ and primaquine. Nevertheless, the collateral selection by artemisinins in the case of mixed P. falciparum/P. vivax infections that are treated by ACT should be minimal. Plasmodium vivax parasites reappearing after ACT treatment may be the relapsing parasites resulted from the awakening hypnozoites, and thus further transmission probably will be from these unselected parasites. In this regard, future surveillance on artemisinin resistance in P. vivax may need to focus on areas such as Indonesia where ACT has replaced CQ for treatment of vivax malaria, though recent analysis of a limited number of samples did not detect mutations in the propeller domain of Pvk12 in the Papua Indonesia samples [31].

Conclusions

Pvk12 only displayed very limited genetic diversity in parasite populations from the China-Myanmar border area, as well as from other regions of the GMS, where artemisinin resistance is P. falciparum has emerged recently. Pvk12 is not implicated in drug resistance nor is it recommended for molecular surveillance for drug resistance.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

DS, BY, HY and DZ carried out the experimental work and data analysis. RR, HY and WY participated in data analysis. DS, YZ and CL performed manuscript writing. YR, YZ and CL conceived the study and participated in the design of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

The work described has not been submitted elsewhere for publication, in whole or in part, and all the authors listed have seen the manuscript and approved to publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

To collect finger-prick blood on filter papers, written informed consent was obtained from the participants or their guardians. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kunming Medical University.

Funding

We thank the staff at the clinics and patients for participation in this study. This project was supported by a grant (U19 AI089672) from the National Institutes of Health, USA and by National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1202226 and 31260508 to ZY). Yanrui Wu was supported by grants (2014FB005) from the Yunnan province.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathogen Biology and Immunology, Kunming Medical University
(2)
Department of Pathology, Kunming Medical University
(3)
Department of Pharmacology, Kunming Medical University
(4)
Department of Cell Biology and Medical Genetics, Kunming Medical University
(5)
Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University

References

  1. WHO. Strategy for malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Subregion (2015–2030). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. p. 64.Google Scholar
  2. Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, Smith BL, Socheat D, Fukuda MM. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2619–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, et al. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:455–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Phyo AP, Nkhoma S, Stepniewska K, Ashley EA, Nair S, McGready R, et al. Emergence of artemisinin-resistant malaria on the western border of Thailand: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2012;379:1960–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Sattabongkot J, Tsuboi T, Zollner GE, Sirichaisinthop J, Cui L. Plasmodium vivax transmission: chances for control? Trends Parasitol. 2004;20:192–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baird JK. Resistance to chloroquine unhinges vivax malaria therapeutics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:1827–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Mayxay M, Pukrittayakamee S, Newton PN, White NJ. Mixed-species malaria infections in humans. Trends Parasitol. 2004;20:233–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Imwong M, Nakeesathit S, Day NP, White NJ. A review of mixed malaria species infections in anopheline mosquitoes. Malar J. 2011;10:253.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Hawkins VN, Joshi H, Rungsihirunrat K, Na-Bangchang K, Sibley CH. Antifolates can have a role in the treatment of Plasmodium vivax. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23:213–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Khim N, Andrianaranjaka V, Popovici J, Kim S, Ratsimbasoa A, Benedet C, et al. Effects of mefloquine use on Plasmodium vivax multidrug resistance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1637–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois AC, Khim N, et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2014;505:50–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, et al. Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:411–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Miotto O, Amato R, Ashley EA, MacInnis B, Almagro-Garcia J, Amaratunga C, et al. Genetic architecture of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Genet. 2015;47:226–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas NM, Anstey NM, Angus BJ, Nosten F, Price RN. Artemisinin combination therapy for vivax malaria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:405–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Gogtay N, Kannan S, Thatte UM, Olliaro PL, Sinclair D. Artemisinin-based combination therapy for treating uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD008492.Google Scholar
  16. Popovici J, Menard D. Challenges in antimalarial drug treatment for vivax malaria control. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21:776–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Popovici J, Kao S, Eal L, Bin S, Kim S, Menard D. Reduced polymorphism in the Kelch propeller domain in Plasmodium vivax isolates from Cambodia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:730–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Yuan L, Wang Y, Parker DM, Gupta B, Yang Z, Liu H, et al. Therapeutic responses of Plasmodium vivax malaria to chloroquine and primaquine treatment in northeastern Myanmar. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:1230–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Malaria Consulting Committee. Principles and regimens of antimalarial drug use in China. Chin J Parasit Dis Con. 2002;15:129–30.Google Scholar
  20. Li N, Parker DM, Yang Z, Fan Q, Zhou G, Ai G, et al. Risk factors associated with slide positivity among febrile patients in a conflict zone of north-eastern Myanmar along the China-Myanmar border. Malar J. 2013;12:361.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhou G, Sun L, Xia R, Duan Y, Xu J, Yang H, et al. Clinical malaria along the China-Myanmar border, Yunnan Province, China, January 2011–August 2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:675–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang Q, Lai S, Zheng C, Zhang H, Zhou S, Hu W, et al. The epidemiology of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum malaria in China, 2004–2012: from intensified control to elimination. Malar J. 2014;13:419.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhou G, Lo E, Zhong D, Wang X, Wang Y, Malla S, et al. Impact of interventions on malaria in internally displaced persons along the China-Myanmar border: 2011–2014. Malar J. 2016;15:471.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bruce MC, Galinski MR, Barnwell JW, Snounou G, Day KP. Polymorphism at the merozoite surface protein-3alpha locus of Plasmodium vivax: global and local diversity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:518–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang Z, Miao J, Huang Y, Li X, Putaporntip C, Jongwutiwes S, et al. Genetic structures of geographically distinct Plasmodium vivax populations assessed by PCR/RFLP analysis of the merozoite surface protein 3beta gene. Acta Trop. 2006;100:205–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. PlasmoDB: http://plasmodb.org/plasmo/. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  28. Hupalo DN, Luo Z, Melnikov A, Sutton PL, Rogov P, Escalante AV, et al. Population genomics studies identify signatures of global dispersal and drug resistance in Plasmodium vivax. Nat Genet. 2016;48:953–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nei M, Gojobori T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 1986;3:418–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Menard D, Khim N, Beghain J, Adegnika AA, Shafiul-Alam M, Amodu O, et al. A worldwide map of Plasmodium falciparum K13-propeller polymorphisms. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2453–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pearson RD, Amato R, Auburn S, Miotto O, Almagro-Garcia J, Amaratunga C, et al. Genomic analysis of local variation and recent evolution in Plasmodium vivax. Nat Genet. 2016;48:959–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Putaporntip C, Kuamsab N, Kosuwin R, Tantiwattanasub W, Vejakama P, Sueblinvong T, et al. Natural selection of K13 mutants of Plasmodium falciparum in response to artemisinin combination therapies in Thailand. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(285):e1–8.Google Scholar
  33. Zhang DD, Lo SC, Cross JV, Templeton DJ, Hannink M. Keap1 is a redox-regulated substrate adaptor protein for a Cul3-dependent ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:10941–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Mbengue A, Bhattacharjee S, Pandharkar T, Liu H, Estiu G, Stahelin RV, et al. A molecular mechanism of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2015;520:683–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Takala-Harrison S, Jacob CG, Arze C, Cummings MP, Silva JC, Dondorp AM, et al. Independent emergence of artemisinin resistance mutations among Plasmodium falciparum in Southeast Asia. J Infect Dis. 2015;211:670–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement