Open Access

Artemether-lumefantrine and liver enzyme abnormalities in non-severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria in returned travellers: a retrospective comparative study with quinine-doxycycline in a Portuguese centre

Malaria Journal201716:43

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1698-y

Received: 1 September 2016

Accepted: 17 January 2017

Published: 25 January 2017

Abstract

Background

Artemisinin-based therapy is the current standard treatment for non-severe malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum. The potential for asymptomatic liver toxicity of this therapy and its implication in clinical practice is currently unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the hepatic function in patients treated with a standard three-day artemisinin-based regimen and to compare it with the quinine-doxycycline regimen.

Methods

Retrospective and comparative study of returned adult travellers admitted with non-severe P. falciparum malaria. Fifty-seven patients were included: 19 treated with artemisinin-based therapy and 38 with quinine-doxycycline therapy.

Results

During treatment, when compared with quinine-doxycycline group, the artemisinin-lumefantrine group presented a higher proportion of significant liver enzyme abnormalities (42 vs. 5%, p < 0.01) and a higher peak value of aspartate aminotransferase (131 vs. 64 U/L, p < 0.01) and alanine aminotransferase (99 vs. 75 U/L, p = 0.05). None of the patients was symptomatic, there were no treatment interruptions and all patients achieved clinical cure.

Conclusions

Treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria with artemisinin-based therapy might cause asymptomatic liver enzyme abnormalities in the first days of treatment. Nevertheless, these liver enzyme abnormalities seem to be harmless, asymptomatic and self-limited.

Keywords

MalariaArtemether–lumefantrineLiver dysfunction Plasmodium falciparum

Background

Artemisinin based combination therapy (ACT) is the current standard treatment for uncomplicated malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum [1]. Owing to their rapid onset of action and quick elimination, artemisinin derivatives are very effective in reducing parasite load and have favourable safety and tolerability profiles [2, 3]. In Portugal, artemether/lumefantrine fixed dose combination (AL), currently the only available ACT, came into medical use in 2013 and is an alternative to quinine plus doxycycline (QD), the previous first-line regimen [1]. The main reasons for this paradigm change are the safety and tolerability profiles of AL and the remaining ACT regimens compared to QD [3, 4].

Hepatotoxicity associated with ACT has been described in animal models [57] and several series in humans have shown elevation of liver enzymes of undetermined clinical significance [8]. On the other hand, it has rarely been described for QD [911] and AL regimens [12]. Even pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials with AL did not find significant hepatic toxicity. However, the laboratory analysis was performed only at baseline and on day 28 the AL effect in the acute phase was not tested [13].

The potential for asymptomatic liver toxicity and its implication in clinical practice need clarification in order to understand the possible impact of ACT on a wider scale. It is also important to assess whether transaminase elevation seen during ACT can be explained solely by malaria-associated liver damage or if it is more likely associated with drug toxicity. It is important to take into account that most ACT for malaria treatment takes place in low-resource settings, where routine toxicity monitoring might not be feasible.

The aim of this study is to assess the hepatic function in patients hospitalized with non-severe falciparum malaria treated with a standard three-day regimen of AL, and to compare them with a historical cohort of patients admitted for the same reason and treated with a QD regimen.

Methods

A retrospective, comparative study was performed, including adult patients (over 18 years old) admitted to the Infectious Diseases Ward of Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal with the diagnosis of non-severe falciparum malaria (as defined by the World Health Organization [1]). The diagnosis of malaria was based on rapid diagnostic test (BINAX Malaria Now®) and microscopy (thin blood film; parasitaemia is expressed as % of parasitized red blood cells). The liver function tests were performed with COBAS® and the same technique was used in both groups [kinetic enzyme essay for transaminases and colorimetric enzyme essay for bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (AP)]. Patients were identified patients using the hospital database (IEG-HSJ®) and subsequently clinical records were consulted. Data concerning demography (gender, age, nationality), past medical history, country of malaria acquisition, duration of symptoms, date of travel to Portugal, duration of hospitalization, duration of symptoms after beginning of treatment, co-infections, level of parasitaemia and its trend, level of liver enzymes before treatment and its highest value, coagulation times, symptoms of liver dysfunction (asthaenia, nausea, vomiting, icterus) and death was collected. The aim was to compare the liver dysfunction in patients hospitalized with non-severe falciparum malaria treated either with AL or QD. Two groups of patients were created according to the treatment received: those treated with AL (all patients admitted during 2014) and those treated with QD per os (all patients admitted between 2010 and 2013), with an AL: QD ratio of 1: 2. The primary outcome was significant liver enzyme abnormalities (defined as an elevation of trasaminases more than five times the normal upper limit in asymptomatic patients or three times in symptomatic patients; elevation of total bilirubin or AP more than two times the normal upper limit). The secondary outcomes were malaria cure, treatment interruption due to side effects and normalization of liver enzymes on follow-up. The most appropriate measure of central tendency and distribution for variables description (mean and standard deviation if normal distribution or median and interquartile range if non-normal distribution) was used. The two groups were compared using the most suitable statistical test; statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0® and a two-sided p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The protocol was approved by the Centro Hospitalar São João Ethics Committee.

Results

A total of 57 patients was included: 19 treated with AL and 38 with QD. The main epidemiological, clinical and analytical variables considered are shown in Table 1, including the comparison of the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding the proportion of males or the mean age (p = 0.65 and p = 0.48, respectively). The majority of patients were Portuguese and acquired malaria in Angola; 49.3% had a previous episode of malaria. None of the patients reported previous hepatic disease or anti-malarial prophylaxis use.
Table 1

Main epidemiological, clinical and analytical variables comparing the two treatment groups: artemether–lumefantrine (AL) and quinine-doxycycline (QD)

Characteristic

Total

(n = 57)

AL group

(n = 19)

QD group

(n = 38)

p value

Demographics

 Male gender (n, %)

51 (89%)

18 (95%)

33 (87%)

0.65a

 Age (mean in years, SD)

41.2 (9.7%)

40 (10)

42 (10)

0.63b

 Portuguese nationality (n, %)

49 (86%)

18 (95%)

31 (81%)

0.25c

Country of malaria acquisition

   

0.48c

 Angola (n, %)

37 (65%)

11 (58%)

26 (68%)

 

 Mozambique (n, %)

7 (12.3%)

2 (11%)

5 (13%)

 

 Other (n, %)

13 (22.8%)

6 (31.6)

7 (18.4%)

 

 Past history of malaria (n, %)

23 (49.3%)

5 (26%)

18 (47%)

0.16c

Parasitaemia

 Initial parasitaemia (n, %) (median, IQR)

1.0 (1.5)

0.5 (0.9)

1.0 (1.5)

0.03 d

 Days until symptoms resolution (median, IQR)

2 (2)

2 (1)

2 (2)

0.89d

 Days until no parasitaemia (median, IQR)

2 (2)

2 (2)

3 (3)

0.09d

Liver panele

 At diagnosis

  Initial AST (median, IQR)

44 (29.5)

46 (41)

42 (26)

0.99d

  Initial ALT (median,IQR)

41 (52)

32 (52)

44 (53)

0.50d

  Initial GGT (median, IQR)

51 (91)

48 (100)

52 (87)

0.84d

  Initial AP (median, IQR)

67 (32.5)

77 (32)

60 (30)

0.13d

  Initial total bilirubin (median, IQR)

1.2 (0.7)

1.2 (0.7)

1.2 (0.7)

0.53d

  Initial aPTT (median, IQR)

34.8 (5.9)

33 (5)

34 (7)

0.45d

During treatment

 Highest AST (median, IQR)

64 (83)

131 (278)

58 (50)

<0.01 d

  Number of days until highest value (median, IQR)

2 (4)

3 (3)

1 (5)

0.43d

 Highest ALT (median, IQR)

83 (88.5)

99 (297)

75 (72)

0.05 d

  Number of days until highest value (median, IQR)

3 (4)

3 (2)

2.5 (4)

0.77d

 Highest GGT (median, IQR)

72.5 (108)

93 (160)

66 (99)

0.16d

 Highest AP (median, IQR)

71 (30)

84 (63)

70 (31)

0.07d

 Highest total bilirubin (median, IQR)

1.6 (1.3)

1.6 (1.4)

1.5 (1.3)

0.85d

 Highest aPTT (median, IQR)

34.8 (6.2)

38 (6)

34 (5)

0.06d

Outcomes

 Asymptomatic liver dysfunction (n, %)

10 (17.5%)

8 (42%)

2 (5%)

<0.01 c

 Symptomatic liver dysfunction (n,%)

0

0

0

 Death (n, %)

0

0

0

Bold indicates significant values at p ≤ 0.05

aPearson Chi square

bIndependent t test

cFisher’s exact test

dMann–Whitney U test

eReference laboratory laboratories: AST 10–37 U/L; ALT 10–37 U/L; GGT 10–49 U/L; AP 30–120 U/L; total bilirubin <1.2 mg/dL; aPTT 24.2–36.4 s

The initial parasitaemia was significantly higher in the QD group (median 1.0 vs. 0.5; p = 0.03, Mann–Whitney U test). There was no difference in the number of days until symptom resolution, although the number of days until parasitaemia clearance was higher in the QD group (but not statistically significant, p = 0.09).

Other infectious causes of liver dysfunction were excluded.

At diagnosis, there were no differences between the groups considering the levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), GGT, AP, total bilirubin or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). However, during treatment, the AL treatment group presented a higher proportion of patients with significant liver enzyme abnormalities [8/19 (42%) vs. 2/38 (5%); p < 0.01] and a higher peak value of AST and ALT (p < 0.01 and p = 0.05, respectively). The remaining liver panel was not significantly different between the groups. None of the patients was symptomatic and there were no treatment interruptions. In the AL-treated group, the duration of hospitalization was not prolonged in those with hepatic dysfunction (median: 5.5 vs. 4 days; p = 0.06, Mann–Whitney U test). All patients were discharged with clinical and microbiological evidence of cure; the mean duration of hospitalization was 5.6 days. AST and ALT returned to normal during outpatient follow-up in all cases.

Discussion

In this study, it is reported for the first time the association between AL treatment in non-severe falciparum malaria and liver enzyme abnormalities occurring on the first day of treatment (which was not observed in the QD group). Treatment of uncomplicated malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum with ACT has high success rates and low described toxicities [13]. However, as for most diseases of the underdeveloped world, post-marketing surveillance is scarce, especially for non-fatal complications.

When AL treatment became the standard treatment in Centro Hospitalar São João, a new trend towards an elevation of hepatic transaminases was noted that could raise questions about AL treatment safety. Nevertheless, these results do not support this view, as significantly higher ALT and AST observed in patients treated with AL were not accompanied by symptoms or complications related to hepatic dysfunction and did not delay hospital discharge.

Hepatic (elevation of AST, ALT and GGT; liver cells degeneration on histology), cardiac, renal, and neurotoxicity, as well as embryonic malformations, associated with ACT regimens have been described in animal models [57, 14]. However, these have not been shown to be relevant in widespread clinical use in humans. This discrepancy in toxicity between human and animal studies is thought to be explained by pharmacokinetic properties of artemisinins. Toxicity seems to be associated mostly with drug exposure (i.e., the area under the drug concentration–time curve). Intramuscular administration of artemisinins, mostly used in animal experiments, seems to be associated with delayed drug release and is thus more prone to toxicity, as opposed to oral administration used to treat human disease, which seems to be generally safe [15, 16].

In the setting of no previous hepatic disease (as in this study), hepatic dysfunction in the context of non-severe malaria can either be due to the disease or to drug toxicity. The only statistically significant difference between the groups (AL vs. QD) regarding general characteristics and disease presentation was the level of parasitaemia, which was significantly higher in the QD group. As such, in this study, hepatic dysfunction caused by malaria does not seem a plausible explanation. On the other hand, there is no data assessing hepatic toxicity during the first days of treatment [13]. Liver damage associated with ACT seems to arise from the release of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress resultant from their strong parasitical activity, with this abrupt and marked change in oxidative status having the potential of damaging liver cells by decreasing the hepatic glutathione S-transferase levels and the superoxide dismutase and catalase activities [17, 18]. However, for the vast majority of patients in all reviews and citations, as well as for all patients included in this comparative study, these alterations are quite benign and always transient, most likely translating a physiological, short-term, hepatic adaptation to artemisinin derivatives rather than true toxicity [13, 19]. On the other hand, the onset of action between QD and AL is known to be different [1, 20]: the latter combination has a quicker onset of action, with a higher per cent of parasite killing (and hence a quicker drop in the level of parasitaemia). The authors question if this faster parasite killing, with consequent higher load for clearance by the reticuloendothelial system, would explain self-limited liver enzyme abnormalities.

The main limitation of this study, regarding its purpose, is that it is not a randomized controlled trial. Because this were carried out prior to the introduction of ACT in clinical practice in Portugal, the switch from QD to AL was automatic when the regimen was available. The differences between QD and AL were suspected with the continued use of the latter. However, previous studies were not designed to find a difference, as described in this study.

This study is a small, retrospective, observational study and therefore selection bias might exist: the QD-treated patients were selected in 2010–2013 and the AL-treated patients in 2014. However, the migration pattern to Portugal did not change during the study period (2010–2014) and the baseline demographic and analytic characteristics did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions

Treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria with AL might cause asymptomatic liver enzyme abnormalities in the first days of treatment. However, the liver enzyme abnormalities seem to be harmless, asymptomatic and self-limited, not affecting clinical outcome. As such, this should not discourage the use of this treatment, but clinicians should be aware of this potential effect in order not to overestimate or undervalue it.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

A-SP: data collection, data analysis, writing of manuscript; RR, FA, RD: data collection, writing and approval of manuscript; ASi: writing and approval of manuscript; CA: coordination, approval of manuscript; ASa: coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The data are available through the corresponding author.

Consent for publication

The authors consent for publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol was submitted to the Ethics Committee of Centro Hospitalar São João and approval was obtained.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Infectious Diseases Department, Centro Hospitalar São João

References

  1. WHO. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. WHO. Antimalarial drug combination therapy. Report of a WHO Technical Consultation. World Health Organization, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. McIntosh HM, Olliaro P. Artemisinin derivatives for treating severe malaria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000527.Google Scholar
  4. Achan J, Talisuna AO, Erhart A, Yeka A, Tibenderana JK, Baliraine FN, et al. Quinine, an old anti-malarial drug in a modern world: role in the treatment of malaria. Malar J. 2011;10:144.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Omotuyi IO, Nwangwu SC, Okugbo OT, Okoye OT, Ojieh GC, Wogu DM. Hepatotoxic and hemolytic effects of acute exposure of rats to artesunate overdose. Afr J Biochem Res. 2008;2:107–10.Google Scholar
  6. Owumi SE, Gbadegesin MA, Odunola OA, Adegoke AM, Uwaifo AO. Toxicity associated with repeated administration of artemether–lumefantrine in rats. Environ Toxicol. 2015;30:301–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yin JY, Wang HM, Wang QJ, Dong YS, Han G, Guan YB, et al. Subchronic toxicological study of two artemisinin derivatives in dogs. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94034.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Ribeiro IR, Olliaro P. Safety of artemisinin and its derivatives: a review of published and unpublished clinical trials. Med Trop (Mars). 1998;58:50–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Farver DK, Lavin MN. Quinine-induced hepatotoxicity. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33:32–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Heaton PC, Fenwick SR, Brewer DE. Association between tetracycline or doxycycline and hepatotoxicity: a population based case-control study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007;32:483–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Punukollu RC, Kumar S, Mullen KD. Quinine hepatotoxicity. An underrecognized or rare phenomenon? Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1112–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bakshi R, Hermeling-Fritz I, Gathmann I, Alteri E. An integrated assessment of the clinical safety of artemether–lumefantrine: a new oral fixed-dose combination antimalarial drug. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94:419–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Makanga M, Bassat Q, Falade CO, Premji ZG, Krudsood S, Hunt P, et al. Efficacy and safety of artemether–lumefantrine in the treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a pooled analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85:793–804.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Angus B. Novel anti-malarial combinations and their toxicity. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2014;7:299–316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Efferth T, Kaina B. Toxicity of the antimalarial artemisinin and its dervatives. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010;40:405–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gordi T, Lepist EI. Artemisinin derivatives: toxic for laboratory animals, safe for humans? Toxicol Lett. 2004;147:99–107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Adaramoye OA, Osaimoje DO, Akinsanya AM, Nneji CM, Fafunso MA, Ademowo OG. Changes in antioxidant status and biochemical indices after acute administration of artemether, artemether–lumefantrine and halofantrine in rats. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102:412–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cui L, Su XZ. Discovery, mechanisms of action and combination therapy of artemisinin. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009;7:999–1013.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kurth F, Belard S, Basra A, Ramharter M. Pyronaridine-artesunate combination therapy for the treatment of malaria. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:564–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Adjuik M, Babiker A, Garner P, Olliaro P, Taylor W, White N, et al. Artesunate combinations for treatment of malaria: meta-analysis. Lancet. 2004;363:9–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement