Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Extremely low Plasmodium prevalence in wild plovers and coursers from Cape Verde and Madagascar

  • 1, 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 4, 6, 7 and
  • 1, 2
Malaria Journal201716:243

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1892-y

  • Received: 25 November 2016
  • Accepted: 5 June 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Relatively little is known about the prevalence of blood parasites in shorebirds, especially those breeding in the tropics. The prevalence of blood parasites of the genera Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon was assessed in blood samples from Kentish plovers and cream-coloured coursers in Cape Verde, and samples of Kittlitz’s plovers, Madagascar plovers and white-fronted plovers in Madagascar.

Results

Only two of these samples were positive for Plasmodium: a Kittlitz’s plover was infected by a generalist lineage of Plasmodium that has already been reported in Europe and Africa, while in a white-fronted plover direct sequencing revealed a previously un-described Plasmodium lineage.

Conclusion

Potential explanations for the low prevalence of blood parasites include the scarcity of vectors in habitats used by these bird species and their resistance to parasitic infections.

Keywords

  • Avian malaria
  • Plasmodium
  • Haemoproteus
  • Leucocytozoon
  • Wild birds

Background

Avian malarial parasites of the genus Plasmodium and the related Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon are vector-borne parasites with often major deleterious effects on birds [1, 2]. Studies based on morphological characterization of blood smears have allowed the identification of diverse blood parasites infecting birds [3]. However, molecular approaches, such as amplifying a fragment of the cytochrome b (cyt b) gene, have provided far more detailed insights [4]. These approaches provide greater sensitivity for detecting parasites [5, 6], but see [7] ] and thus allow more accurate and detailed measurement of specificity [4, 8] and the geographical distribution [9] of blood parasites.

The number of studies identifying blood parasites infecting wild birds has increased over the past decade. However, there is still a lack of information regarding parasites that circulate in remote areas or which infect particular wild bird species, such as plovers (Charadrius spp.) and coursers (Cursorius spp.), which are diverse and have a broad geographical distribution. Previous studies have shown that plovers often carry very few blood parasites, although these studies have mainly focused on migratory species breeding at medium–high latitudes in the northern hemisphere. For instance, Figuerola et al. [10] did not find any blood parasites in smears of Kentish plovers Charadrius alexandrinus and Mendes et al. [11] found evidence of blood parasite infection in only 7 of 56 (12.5%) individuals of four Charadrius species. Furthermore, in the “Host-parasite catalogue of the avian haematozoa” Bennett et al. [12] reported that only some of the plover species tested (e.g. Kentish plovers, little ringed plover Charadrius dubius and three-banded plovers Charadrius tricollaris) harbored blood parasites. Moreover, precise information on the parasite lineages infecting these birds is very limited with few Plasmodium and Haemoproteus lineages infecting Charadrius spp. (e.g. [13]; see also the MalAvi database [14]). Therefore, there is a general lack of information on the prevalence and diversity of blood parasite lineages infecting plovers, especially in tropical areas where most of these birds are year-round residents and vector-borne parasite transmission may be favoured. Similarly, Haemoproteus and Plasmodium parasites have been found in Cursorius temminckii, while negative results have been reported in four other Cursorius species [12].

Here, the presence of blood parasites belonging to the genera Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon infecting plovers and coursers from Cape Verde and Madagascar was molecularly screened. Specifically, this study was focused on four species of the family Charadriidae: the Kentish plover Charadrius alexandrinus, the Kittlitz’s plover Charadrius pecuarius, the white-fronted plover Charadrius marginatus and the endangered Madagascar plover Charadrius thoracicus, as well as the related cream-coloured courser Cursorius cursor (family Glareolidae).

Methods

Kentish plovers and cream-coloured coursers were captured between September and December of 2015 at the island of Maio, Cape Verde (15°08′N, 23°13′W). Here, approximately 100–150 pairs of plovers and 20-40 pairs of coursers breed in the sand dunes, salt marshes and semi-desert areas in Salina Porto Ingles, Maio. White-fronted plovers, Kittlitz’s plovers and Madagascar plovers were captured between March and June 2013, 2014 and 2015 in Andavadoaka, Madagascar (−22°05′S, 43°15′E) where they breed on the shoreline of alkaline lakes. In both sites, adults were captured on the nest using funnel traps. Approximately 25–50 μL of blood were collected from the brachial vein of birds and stored in ethanol (96%). See [15] for further details on the field procedures used.

Genomic DNA was extracted using a standard phenol–chloroform protocol. DNA concentration was quantified using both agarose gels and the NanoDrop® ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Nano Drop Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). Samples were diluted using sterile water to a working DNA concentration 20–25 ng/µL. DNA samples from 43 birds were molecularly sexed to check for high quality DNA extraction and all of these samples provided successful amplifications. The presence of Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon parasites was screened using the protocol detailed by [16]. In spite of the potential limitations of the molecular identification of blood parasites in bird blood, especially for the detection of mixed infections [1719], molecular methods are broadly used as they are sensitive approaches providing exciting opportunities to identify a high diversity of blood parasites [4, 8, 14]. In addition, parasite prevalence of haemosporidian parasites estimated using only PCRs is similar to that estimated by microscopy or when comparing both methods [6, 7].

Samples were tested in three independent reactions to reduce the occurrence of false negatives. Both positive and negative controls (water only) were included in each PCR plate. PCR reactions were resolved on 1.8% agarose gels. Amplicons were sequenced by Macrogen (Macrogen Inc., The Netherlands) and sequences were edited using Sequencher™ v 4.9 (Gene Codes Coep., @ 1991–2009, Ann Arbor, MI 48108). Parasite lineages were identified by comparison with sequences deposited in GenBank (National Center for Biotechnology Information). Additional information of the blood parasites identified was obtained from MalAvi [14].

Results

A total of 215 samples from 208 adult birds were screened for the presence of blood parasites. Of these samples, seven individuals (three Madagascar plovers, two white-fronted plovers and two Kittlitz’s plovers) were sampled twice at different time points. Only two out of 208 individuals tested positive for Plasmodium parasites (Table 1): a Kittlitz’s plover and a white-fronted plover captured in Madagascar in 2014 and 2015 respectively. Haemoproteus or Leucocytozoon parasites were not detected.
Table 1

Number of male and female birds captured in Madagascar and Cape Verde

 

Madagascar

Cape Verde

 

Females

Males

Females

Males

Cream-coloured courser

  

9

11

20

Kentish plover

  

10

10

20

Kittlitz’s plover

29a

29

  

58

Madagascar plover

28

27

  

55

White-fronted plover

28

27a

  

55

Total bird sampled

85

83

19

21

208

Three Madagascar plovers, two white-fronted plovers and two Kittlitz’s plovers were sampled twice along the study period

aOne individual was infected in both species by Plasmodium

The Plasmodium lineages identified in this study corresponded to a new lineage CHAMAR01 (Genbank accession number: KY053456) isolated from the white-fronted plover and the P_MILAN06 lineage isolated from a Kittlitz’s plover. The lineage CHAMAR01 was amplified in three independent PCR reactions. Amplicons from two independent PCR reactions of this sample were sequenced in both directions obtaining identical results. By comparing this sequence with those deposited in Genbank (fragments of a similar length obtained following the same procedure used here), a 99% overlap was found with sequences P_AFR110 from Parus griseiventris from Africa [20] and KOKAKO01 from Callaeas cinerea from New Zealand [21]. By contrast, the lineage P_MILAN06 was only amplified once, suggesting the possibility that the bird suffered a low intensity of infection (low concentration of parasite DNA). P_MILAN06 was previously found infecting black kites Milvus migrans (Accipitridae; HF543656) and blue-spotted wood doves Turtur afer (Columbidae, unpublished according to MalAvi).

Discussion

Here, the prevalence and diversity of blood parasites infecting four species of plovers and one courser species from Cape Verde and Madagascar was studied. Only two out of 208 individuals were infected by Plasmodium parasites (overall prevalence 0.96%). Only a handful of studies have investigated blood parasites infecting wild birds in these areas. For the case of Cape Verde, Hille et al. [22] investigated the blood parasite prevalence in common kestrels using blood smears. During the last years, three studies have identified molecularly the prevalence and diversity of blood parasite lineages infecting wild birds from Madagascar [2325], adding valuable information to the previous knowledge based on blood smears [26, 27]. Although combining the identification of blood parasites based on the screening of blood smears and molecular approaches could add valuable information [7], molecular methods are broadly used as they allow the identification of genetic diversity and host-range of blood parasites [4, 8, 9, 14, 24]. Furthermore, the prevalence of infection estimated using molecular methods is similar than those measured using smears or combining both microscopy and PCR methods [7]. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to link the genetic lineages of the parasites found here with their morphological species. The blood parasite prevalence found here was similar to those reported in another species studied in Cape Verde (1.5% in endemic kestrels [22]), but much lower than those reported for other avian species in Madagascar [26]. However, contrary to the case of Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon that infected 17.4 and 9.4% of birds in Madagascar, the prevalence of Plasmodium found here was similar to that previously reported (0.96% vs 1.9% [26]).

Different factors may explain the low prevalence of blood parasites in this study, for example, resistance to parasite infections in these bird species [28] and/or environmental factors reducing the abundance of the arthropod vectors and consequently limiting the transmission of blood parasites [29]. All plover species including the courser were breeding along salt marshes, thus reducing their exposure to the vectors required for parasite transmission. Thus, a low exposure to insect vectors may partially explain our results, especially those from the Cape Verde archipelago [22]. In fact, the scarcity of potential vectors has been repeatedly suggested as a potential reason explaining the absent or low prevalence of blood parasites found in birds in Macaronesia [22, 30, 31]. Contrary to the case of Cape Verde, Madagascar has a diversity of habitats suitable for vector development, which may explain the blood parasite transmission in this area [26]. It is also possible that the low prevalence found in the plovers was due to resistance to Haematozoa infections, as a low prevalence of infection by blood parasites is usually found in plovers captured in other geographical areas [10, 11].

To our knowledge, only a single study has investigated the potential mosquito vectors of avian Plasmodium in Madagascar [24]. Plasmodium DNA was found in the head-thorax of mosquito species belonging to the genera Uranotaenia, Culex and Anopheles [24]. In a recent checklist of the mosquitoes in Madagascar, authors recorded additional mosquito genera which could be involved in avian malaria transmission including Mansonia and Coquillettidia [32] because these genera of mosquitoes have been found involved in the transmission of avian Plasmodium in other areas of the world [33]. Although molecular identification of blood parasites in mosquitoes does not imply vector competence, this approach allows a first filter to identify the potential species involved in Plasmodium transmission. In this respect, mosquito species belonging to these genera could be involved in the transmission of the Plasmodium lineages found here, as Plasmodium parasites are considered generalist parasites being transmitted by a number of mosquito species [34, 35].

In addition to the lineage CHAMAR01 described here for the first time, the lineage P_MILAN06 was found infecting a Kittlitz’s plover. Previous information on the occurrence of this parasite lineage in birds provides some information on its geographical distribution and host range. This lineage P_MILAN06 was isolated from an adult black kite captured in Spain [31] and from the resident wood dove in Gabon. This suggests that P_MILAN06 is a generalist parasite lineage that infects species from a variety of orders across a wide geographical distribution that includes, at least, Europe, continental Africa and, probably, Madagascar. However, because this parasite was only amplified in a single PCR reaction, this suggests that this parasite lineage had a low intensity of infection in our study. Further research will be necessary to determine which avian and mosquito species play a key role as reservoirs and vectors of these parasite lineages. Such future studies are plausible as parasites can be detected molecularly in spite of an extremely low intensity of infection in avian blood [8].

Conclusion

A very low prevalence of infection is found in plovers and coursers from Cape Verde and Madagascar, which could be due to the scarcity of vectors in habitats used by these bird species and their resistance to parasitic infections.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

JMP, TS and JF conceived and designed the study. JMP, LJEP, MCC-I, SZ, MJN, OK, JIH, TS and JF sampled birds and/or analysed the samples. JMP, MJN and JF drafted the manuscript with valuable contribution of the other authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Isabel Martín and Laura Gómez helped in the laboratory and Carlos Reis and Orsolya Vincze provided valuable assistance in the field.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Sequences obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank. Additional data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Ethics statements

All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the VolkswagenStiftung (Social behaviour and diseases: a comparative investigation of island and mainland bird populations) to TS and JF, Grant CGL2015-65055-P from the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad and European Regional Development’s funds (FEDER) to JF, and the Deutsche Forchungsgemeinschaft (GZ: KR 2089/9-1, AOBJ: 600454) to OK, JH, and TS. JMP and MJ were supported by a Juan de la Cierva contract and a grant from SEO/Birdlife, respectively.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Américo Vespucio, 26, Seville, E-41092, Spain
(2)
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Seville, Spain
(3)
Department of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany
(4)
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
(5)
Institut Supérieur de Technologie de Menabe, Morondava, Madagascar
(6)
Maio Biodiversity Foundation, Maio, Cape Verde
(7)
Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, Wallotstrasse 19, D-14193 Berlin, Germany

References

  1. Merino S, Moreno J, Sanz JJ, Arriero E. Are avian blood parasites pathogenic in the wild? A medication experiment in blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Proc Biol Sci. 2000;267:2507–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Martínez-de la Puente J, Merino S, Tomás G, Moreno J, Morales J, Lobato E, et al. The blood parasite Haemoproteus reduces survival in a wild bird: a medication experiment. Biol Lett. 2010;6:663–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Valkiūnas G. Avian malaria parasites and other haemosporidia. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Bensch S, Stjernman M, Hasselquist D, Örjan Ö, Hannson B, Westerdahl H, et al. Host specificity in avian blood parasites: a study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus mitochondrial DNA amplified from birds. Proc Biol Sci. 2000;267:1583–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Garamszegi LZ. The sensitivity of microscopy and PCR-based detection methods affecting estimates of prevalence of blood parasites in birds. J Parasitol. 2010;96:1197–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. del Cerro S, Merino S, Martínez-de la Puente J, Lobato E, Ruiz-de-Castañeda R, Rivero-de Aguilar J, et al. Carotenoid-based plumage colouration is associated with blood parasite richness and stress protein levels in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Oecologia. 2010;162:825–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, Krizanauskiene A, Palinauskas V, Sehgal RNM, Bensch S. A comparative analysis of microscopy and PCR-based detection methods for blood parasites. J Parasitol. 2008;94:1395–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Moens MA, Valkiūnas G, Paca A, Bonaccorso E, Aguirre N, Pérez-Tris J. Parasite specialization in a unique habitat: hummingbirds as reservoirs of generalist blood parasites of Andean birds. J Anim Ecol. 2016;85:1234–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pérez-Rodríguez A, Ramírez Á, Richardson DS, Pérez-Tris J. Evolution of parasite island syndromes without long-term host population isolation: parasite dynamics in Macaronesian blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2013;22:1272–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Figuerola J, Velarde A, Bertolero A, Cerda F. Abwesenheit von Haematozoa bei einer Brutpopulation des Seeregenpfeifers Charadrius alexandrinus in Nordspanien. J Ornithol. 1996;137:523–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Mendes L, Piersma T, Lecoq M, Spaans B, Ricklefs RE. Disease-limited distributions? Contrasts in the prevalence of avian malaria in shorebird species using marine and freshwater habitats. Oikos. 2005;109:396–404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bennett GF, Whiteway M, Woodworth-Lynas C. Host-parasite catalogue of the Avian haematozoa. Newfoundland: Occasional Papers in Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland; 1982.Google Scholar
  13. Clark NJ, Clegg SM, Klaassen M. Migration strategy and pathogen risk: non-breeding distribution drives malaria prevalence in migratory waders. Oikos. 2016;125:1358–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Bensch S, Hellgren O, Pérez-Tris J. MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9:1353–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carmona-Isunza MC, Küpper C, Serrano-Meneses MA, Székely T. Courtship behavior differs between monogamous and polygamous plovers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69:2035–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hellgren O, Waldenström J, Bensch S. A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J Parasitol. 2004;90:797–802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Valkiūnas G, Bensch S, Iezhova TA, Križanauskienė A, Hellgren O, Bolshakov CV. Nested cytochrome b polymerase chain reaction diagnostics underestimate missed infections of avian blood haemosporidian parasites: microscopy is still essential. J Parasitol. 2006;92:418–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Martínez J, Martínez-de la Puente J, Herrero J, Del Cerro S, Lobato E, Rivero-de Aguilar J, et al. A restriction site to differentiate Plasmodium and Haemoproteus infections in birds: on the inefficiency of general primers for detection of mixed infections. Parasitology. 2009;136:713–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bernotienė R, Palinauskas V, Iezhova T, Murauskaitė D, Valkiūnas G. Avian haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida): a comparative analysis of different polymerase chain reaction assays in detection of mixed infections. Exp Parasitol. 2016;163:31–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lutz HL, Hochachka WM, Engel JI, Bell JA, Tkach VV, Bates JM, et al. Parasite prevalence corresponds to host life history in a diverse assemblage of Afrotropical birds and haemosporidian parasites. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0121254.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ewen JG, Bensch S, Blackburn TM, Bonneaud C, Brown R, Cassey P, et al. Establishment of exotic parasites: the origins and characteristics of an avian malaria community in an isolated island avifauna. Ecol Lett. 2012;15:1112–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hille SM, Nash JP, Krone O. Hematozoa in endemic subspecies of common kestrel in the Cape Verde Islands. J Wildl Dis. 2007;43:752–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Barraclough RK, Duval L, Talman AM, Ariey F, Robert V. Attraction between sexes: male–female gametocyte behaviour within a Leucocytozoon toddi (Haemosporida). Parasitol Res. 2008;102:1321–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmid S, Dinkel A, Mackenstedt U, Tantely ML, Randrianambinintsoa FJ, Boyer S, et al. Avian malaria on Madagascar: bird hosts and putative vector mosquitoes of different Plasmodium lineages. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Ishtiaq F, Beadell JS, Warren BH, Fleischer RC. Diversity and distribution of avian haematozoan parasites in the western Indian Ocean region: a molecular survey. Parasitology. 2012;139:221–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Savage AF, Robert V, Goodman SM, Raharimanga V, Raherilalao MJ, Andrianarimisa A, et al. Blood parasites in birds from Madagascar. J Wildl Dis. 2009;45:907–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Barraclough R, Robert V, Peirce M. New species of haematozoa from the avian families Campephagidae and Apodidae. Parasite. 2008;15:105–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Martínez-Abraín A, Esparza B, Oro D. Lack of blood parasites in bird species: does absence of blood parasite vectors explain it all. Ardeola. 2004;51:225–32.Google Scholar
  29. Piersma T. Do global patterns of habitat use and migration strategies co-evolve with relative investments in immunocompetence due to spatial variation in parasite pressure? Oikos. 1997;80:623–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Gutiérrez-López R, Gangoso L, Martínez-de la Puente J, Fric J, López-López P, Mailleux M, et al. Low prevalence of blood parasites in a long-distance migratory raptor: the importance of host habitat. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:189.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Pérez-Rodríguez A, de la Puente J, Onrubia A, Pérez-Tris J. Molecular characterization of Haemosporidian parasites from kites of the genus Milvus (Aves: accipitridae). Int J Parasitol. 2013;43:381–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tantely ML, Le Goff G, Boyer S, Fontenille D. An updated checklist of mosquito species (Diptera: culicidae) from Madagascar. Parasite. 2016;23:20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Santiago-Alarcon D, Palinauskas V, Schaefer HM. Diptera vectors of avian Haemosporidian parasites: untangling parasite life cycles and their taxonomy. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012;87:928–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kimura M, Darbro JM, Harrington LC. Avian malaria parasites share congeneric mosquito vectors. J Parasitol. 2010;96:144–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ferraguti M, Martínez-de la Puente J, Muñoz J, Roiz D, Ruiz S, Soriguer R, et al. Avian Plasmodium in Culex and Ochlerotatus mosquitoes from Southern Spain: effects of season and host-feeding source on parasite dynamics. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66237.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement