Open Access

Immunogenicity of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored micronemal antigen in natural Plasmodium vivax exposure

Malaria Journal201716:348

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1967-9

Received: 4 May 2017

Accepted: 1 August 2017

Published: 22 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Plasmodium vivax is the most geographically widespread malaria species and codominates with Plasmodium falciparum, the deadliest form of the malaria parasite. For the last few years, the number of vivax malaria cases has increased, but vivax malaria is still considered a neglected disease. During the blood stages of their life cycle, P. vivax parasites export several hundred proteins into host red blood cells. Some of these exported proteins have been discovered and studied for use as a blood-stage malaria vaccine. The P. vivax glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored micronemal antigen (PvGAMA) was identified in previous study, which plays an important role in parasite invasion. To support the hypothesis that PvGAMA can induce an immune response in natural exposure, the antibody responses and cellular immunity against this antigen was demonstrated during and post-infection.

Methods

The recombinant protein PvGAMA was expressed and purified by wheat germ cell-free (WGCF) system. The analysis of humoral and cellular immune responses to the PvGAMA antigen during infection and post-infection with the P. vivax parasite were done by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques.

Results

During P. vivax infection, 95% of patients showed significant antibody responses to PvGAMA antigen. The cytophilic IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes were the major isotypes produced in response to PvGAMA. A cross-sectional study of anti-PvGAMA responses during and post-infection with P. vivax found that the majority of individuals, approximately 54% of patients, were shown to maintain a positive anti-PvGAMA titre at 3 months post-infection, and some patients had the ability to maintain an antibody response for up to 12 months post-infection. Moreover, PvGAMA had the ability to stimulate a cellular immune response that was characterized by the production of the cytokines IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-10. The levels of the cytokines IFN-γ and IL-10 were significantly increased in PvGAMA-stimulated lymphocyte cultures.

Conclusions

Taken together, PvGAMA had potential to induce an immune response both humoral and cellular immunity in naturally acquired P. vivax infection individuals during infection and post-infection. Therefore, PvGAMA could be as a vaccine candidate to stimulate immune response against P. vivax infection.

Keywords

Immunogenicity Plasmodium vivax GAMA

Background

Malaria remains one of the most devastating infectious diseases, killing approximately 429,000 people in 2015. Plasmodium vivax is the most geographically widespread malaria parasite species and codominates with Plasmodium falciparum as a cause of human malaria. Plasmodium vivax has previously been considered benign; however, during the last few years, P. vivax is estimated to have been responsible for 3100 deaths [1]. Due to some specific characteristics that make it distinct from P. falciparum, such as the fact that the P. vivax hypnozoite can become reactivated, cause repeated clinical malaria attacks, and undergo onward transmission, emerging data indicate that P. vivax is very often associated with severe symptoms [2, 3]. Developing a vaccine is considered to be one of several strategies to control and eradicate vivax malaria. A greater understanding and improved knowledge of protective immunity against the parasite are required to achieve this goal.

One approach to P. vivax vaccine development is to focus on the interruption of merozoite invasion of erythrocytes via the critical ligand-receptor interaction between Duffy-binding protein (DBP) and its corresponding surface receptor on erythrocytes: namely, Duffy antigen receptor for chemokine (DARC). PvDBP is a leading target for a P. vivax vaccine candidate since this antigen could induce an antibody response that prevented P. vivax binding to erythrocytes and parasite invasion [48]. However, the description of cases of vivax malaria among Duffy-negative individuals was reported in sub-Saharan Africans [9]. It is suggested that alternative ligands and pathways play a role in reticulocyte invasion. As such, finding additional vaccine candidates is necessary for controlling malaria.

The glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins (GPI-APs) are one type of protein antigen important for parasite invasion [10]. Several GPI-APs have been discovered and characterized as blood-stage vaccine candidates against P. vivax infection; these include PvMSP-1, PvMSP-3, PvMSP-4, PvMSP-8, PvMSP-9, PvMSP-10, Pv12, Pv34, Pv38 and PvMSP1P [3, 11]. A new erythrocyte-binding protein named GPI-anchored micronemal antigen (GAMA) was first identified in P. falciparum [12]. The importance of conformation-specific epitopes was revealed by a previous study showing that only an antibody against PfGAMA expressed by the wheat germ cell-free (WGCF) system can inhibit P. falciparum invasion; by contrast, antibodies generated from PfGAMA expressed by Escherichia coli failed to inhibit invasion [12]. The ortholog of PfGAMA, P. vivax GPI-anchored micronemal antigen (PvGAMA), has been successfully produced and its function was characterized in previous study [13]. PvGAMA was localized at the microneme in the mature schizont blood stage. This antigen can bind to human erythrocytes regardless of the Duffy antigen status. Importantly, the antibodies against the PvGAMA fragment inhibited erythrocyte binding, suggesting that this protein is a novel blood-stage vaccine candidate [13]. Thus, a greater understanding of PvGAMA antigenicity and immunogenicity in the induction of the immune response, as well as in the longevity of the antibody response, is required. In this study, the immunogenicity of PvGAMA in the induction of the immune response was demonstrated, both for antibody and cellular responses during and post-infection with P. vivax.

Methods

Sample collection

To study humoral immune responses to PvGAMA antigen, a study was carried out in an area of low malaria transmission, Chumphon Province, in the southern part of Thailand, where both P. vivax and P. falciparum commonly occur. Ten mL samples of heparinized peripheral blood were collected from individuals acutely infected with P. vivax (n = 40), and from those who had been in recovery for 3 months (n = 35), 9 months (n = 15) and 12 months (n = 14) between May 2014 and May 2015. The age of subjects ranged from 18 to 63 years old. Fifteen samples from villagers who lived in malaria-endemic areas for more than 5 years and showed a negative parasitaemia smear at the time of collection were obtained. Giemsa staining of thick and thin peripheral blood films was used for P. vivax diagnosis. The density of malaria parasites in the blood of infected patients ranges from 200 parasite/μL to 15,000 of parasites/μL. The nested PCR was used to confirm P. vivax infection during acute phase and to confirm the presence of parasite at 3, 9 and 12 months post-infection.

To study the cellular immune responses to PvGAMA, peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were obtained from acutely infected individuals (n = 11) and individuals who had been in recovery for 8–10 weeks (n = 11). Blood samples were taken from healthy persons (n = 50) who had never been exposed to malaria, which were held at the Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, were used as the naive controls in this study. The study was approved by the committee on Human Rights Related to Human Experimentation, Mahidol University, Thailand (MUIRB2012/079.2408).

Nested PCR detection of P. vivax parasite

The nested PCR was performed as described previously [14]. In briefly, genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples, 2 µL of DNA template in a 20 µL reaction mixture was amplified by primer rPLU1_F (TCA AAG ATT AAG CCA TGC AAG TGA) and primer rPLU5_R (CCT GTT GTT GCC TTA AAC TTC). The reactions were as follows: initial denaturation, 95 °C for 5 min; denaturation, 95 °C for 30 s; annealing, 55 °C for 1 min; extension, 72 °C for 2 min. Then, the secondary PCR was done by using product from first reaction as DNA template. The DNA template was mix with same condition of 20 µL reaction mixture and amplified by P. vivax species-specific nested PCR primers rVIV1_F (CGC TTC TAG CTT AAT CCA CAT AAC TGA TAC) and primer VIV1_R (ACT TCC AAG CCG AAG CAA AGA AAG TCC TTA). The secondary PCR reactions were as follows: initial denaturation, 95 °C for 5 min; denaturation, 95 °C for 30 s; annealing, 60 °C for 30 s; extension, 72 °C for 1 min. The PCR product was observed in 1.5% agarose gel stained with fluorescent nucleic acid gel stains.

Recombinant PvGAMA proteins

The recombinant protein PvGAMA-Ecto domain comprising amino acid 22–771 was expressed and purified as previously described [13]. Briefly, the PVX_088910 fragments encoding PvGAMA-ectodomain and a hexahistidine (His) tag at the C-terminus, were amplified using sense primers with XhoI sites and antisense primers with BamHI restriction sites. The amplified fragments were then restricted and ligated into the WGCF expression vector pEU-E01-His-TEV-MCS (CellFree Sciences, Matsuyama, Japan). The cloned inserts were sequenced using an ABI 3700 Genetic Analyzer (Genotech, Daejeon, Korea). The recombinant proteins with His tags were expressed using a WGCF system (CellFree Sciences) and purified using a Nickel-Sepharose column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden).

IgG antibody responses against PvGAMA

The levels of antibody produced in response to PvGAMA in individuals with P. vivax infection were measured by a conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In brief, 5 μg/mL of recombinant PvGAMA protein was coated overnight in 96-well microtitre plates. Next, blocking buffer, 5% skimmed milk, was added to each well and incubated for 2 h. After washing the plates 3 times, human plasma diluted 1:200 with blocking buffer was added to the coated plates and incubated for 1 h. The wells were extensively washed, followed by the addition of 1:1000-diluted alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG antibodies into each well and incubated for 1 h. The plate was washed five times before adding ABTS [2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid)] substrate into the wells, and the plate was left for 60 min in the dark to allow the colorimetric reaction to occur. The optical density of each of the sample wells was measured at 405 nm (OD405) using a Synergy™ HTX Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Samples from all subjects were analysed in duplicate, and mean values were used in the subsequent analyses.

IgG isotype responses to PvGAMA

The prevalence of the IgG isotype response specific for PvGAMA was demonstrated in comparison to PvDBPII since PvDBPII is a leading blood-stage vaccine candidate against P. vivax (PvDBPII was a gift from John H. Adams, University of South Florida, FL, USA). Plasma samples from patients who were acutely infected with P. vivax (n = 29) and from healthy controls (n = 18) were analysed using an ELISA assay. Briefly, 5 μg/mL of rPvGAMA or 2 μg/mL of rPvDBPII was immobilized on 96-well microtitre plates by incubation at 4 °C overnight. Non-specific protein binding was blocked using a blocking buffer containing 5% skimmed milk for 2 h. The plates were incubated with 100 μL of plasma at a dilution of 1:100 in blocking buffer. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-human IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 antibodies diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer were used for detection. The optical density of the reaction was measured at 450 nm after the addition of the enzyme–substrate (TMB). The cut-off value was obtained from the mean plus two standard deviations (SDs) of the OD of all of the healthy control plasma samples.

PBMC stimulation assay

A lymphocyte proliferation assay (LPA) was carried out to evaluate cellular immunity against PvGAMA. First, PBMCs were isolated from patients who were acutely infected with P. vivax and those who had been in recovery for 8–10 weeks using Ficoll-Hypaque (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada). PBMCs were then washed twice with incomplete Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium. PBMCs were used for the LPA when viability was greater than 90%. PBMCs were suspended in complete RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 2.5  ×  105 PBMCs were added into each well of a 96-well flat-bottomed tissue culture plate (Corning Inc., New York, NY, USA). The cells were then stimulated by 10 μg/mL of purified rPvGAMA or rPvDBPII. The complete RPMI 1640 medium and PBMCs stimulated with 2% v/v of phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Cells were cultured for 96 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2. After 96 h, the culture supernatant was harvested for cytokine detection.

Cytokine assay

The cytokine levels in human lymphocyte culture supernatants were detected after 96 h of stimulation with PvGAMA using an ELISA Cytokine Kit (BD OptEIA™; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), as described previously [15]. Briefly, 100 μL of culture supernatant was added into wells pre-coated with monoclonal antibodies specific to IL-2, IL-10 or IFN-γ. After 2 h of incubation at room temperature, streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase conjugate mixed with biotinylated anti-human cytokine antibodies was added, and then incubated for 1 h. The colorimetric reaction was developed by the addition of 100 μL of TMB substrate solution and the OD was measured at 450 nm (OD450) within 30 min after the addition of a stop solution. A human cytokine standard curve was used as the experimental control to calculate cytokine concentrations. All experiments were done in duplicate, and the means of the two values were used for subsequent analyses.

Statistical analysis

Data and graphs were analysed using the GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, CA, USA). A nonparametric Mann–Whitney t test was used to determine where there was a significant difference between the study groups in terms of the levels of antibody against PvGAMA. A Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to evaluate the significance of cellular responses to PvGAMA or PvDBPII in each individual. In all analyses, a P value less than 0.05 (P <  0.05) was deemed statistically significant.

Results

Naturally acquired IgG responses to PvGAMA

To evaluate the humoral immune response against PvGAMA in sera from Thai individuals, the antibody response to this antigen was examined by indirect ELISA. The results showed a significant increase in the anti-PvGAMA antibody response in patients who were acutely infected with P. vivax compared with the immune villagers (P < 0.0001; acute P. vivax OD value = 0.266 ± 0.246; endemic villagers OD value = 0.078 ± 0.006) and healthy controls (P < 0.0001; acute P. vivax OD value = 0.266 ± 0.246; healthy control OD value = 0.071 ± 0.004) (Fig. 1). There was no PvGAMA-seropositive individual found in the group of endemic villagers (Fig. 1). The seroprevalence of anti-PvGAMA response were 95.0, 54.3, 66.7 and 57.1% during acute infection, at 3, 9 and 12 months post-infection, respectively (Fig. 2; Table 1).
Fig. 1

Humoral immune response to the PvGAMA antigen. The total levels of IgG specific to recombinant PvGAMA in human plasma from patients with acute P. vivax infection patients (n = 40), villagers in malaria endemic areas (n = 15) and healthy controls (n = 50) were measured by conventional ELISA. Each symbol represents the antibody titre of one individual. The solid line shows the median antibody titre in each group. The dotted line indicates the cut-off values

Fig. 2

The antigenicity of PvGAMA during and post-infection with Plasmodium vivax. The anti-PvGAMA responses were measured in acutely infected individuals (n = 40) and in patients who had been in recovery for 3 months (n = 35), 9 months (n = 15) and 12 months (n = 14) by conventional ELISA assay. Each symbol represents the antibody titre of one individual. The solid line shows the median antibody titre in each group. The dotted line indicates the cut-off values

Table 1

The serological analysis of anti-PvGAMA responses during acute Plasmodium vivax infection and post-infection

Subjects

% Positive prevalencea

Optical density (OD)

Min.

Max.

Median

SD

P valueb

Acute phase

95.0

0.077

1.052

0.126

0.246

<0.0001

3 months of recovery

54.3

0.065

0.734

0.084

0.137

<0.0001

9 months of recovery

66.7

0.061

0.382

0.081

0.067

<0.0001

12 months of recovery

57.1

0.068

0.373

0.085

0.081

0.0004

Min. the lowest antibody titre of each group of subjects, Max. the highest antibody titre of each group of subjects, Median the median of antibody titre presented as the median OD value of each group of subjects, SD the standard deviation of antibody titre of each group of subjects, NS not significant

aPositive prevalence: the percentage of seropositive individuals who had OD values greater than the cut-off value (mean ± 2 SD of the OD value of healthy controls)

bThe P value of the difference between the mean antibody titre of P. vivax-infected subjects and those in the recovery phase or healthy controls, as calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test

The longevity of anti-PvGAMA antibody responses in P. vivax infection

To observe the longevity of anti-PvGAMA responses after anti-malarial treatment, a cohort study was conducted to monitoring of antibody responses in individuals during and at 3, 9 and 12 months post-infection. After 3 months infection, 13 individuals from 24 infected patients maintained a positive of anti-PvGAMA response whereas 11 patients, PV01, PV11, PV12, PV13, PV14, PV30, PV33, PV34, PV35, PV38 and PV40, became seronegative (Fig. 3a; Table 2).
Fig. 3

The kinetics of anti-PvGAMA responses in acute infection and after anti-malarial treatment. Only individuals who were seropositive to PvGAMA in the acute phase were part of subsequent experiments involving the detection of antibody responses. a A comparison of the anti-PvGAMA antibody levels in individuals during acute infection and at 3 months post-infection (n = 24). b Antibody responses to PvGAMA in PvGAMA-seropositive patients (n = 7) and after 3, 9 and 12 months of recovery

Table 2

The longitudinal analysis of anti-PvGAMA responses in individuals during acute Plasmodium vivax infection and 3 months post-infection

Subject

Optical density (OD)

Acute phase

3 months post-infection

Pv01

0.405

0.075

Pv02

0.427

0.218

Pv03

0.864

0.426

Pv04

0.395

0.279

Pv05

0.134

0.091

Pv06

0.086

0.084

Pv08

0.363

0.219

Pv09

0.362

0.258

Pv11

0.081

0.074

Pv12

0.090

0.071

Pv13

0.086

0.073

Pv14

0.080

0.072

Pv15

0.081

0.085

Pv16

0.616

0.084

Pv30

0.116

0.077

Pv31

0.494

0.086

Pv32

0.221

0.087

Pv33

0.082

0.068

Pv34

0.138

0.072

Pv35

0.096

0.074

Pv37

0.805

0.241

Pv38

0.081

0.070

Pv39

0.379

0.092

Pv40

0.544

0.069

Seropositive: the individuals who had OD values greater than or equal to the cut-off value (mean ± 2 SD of the OD value of healthy controls = 0.078)

Additionally, the further analysis of stable anti-PvGAMA responses by following the antibody titre in individuals (n = 7) until 12 months post-infection showed that 6 of 7 individuals had a positive anti-PvGAMA responses after 3 months of infection. At 9 months post-infection, the patients PV02, PV03, PV04, PV06 and PV08 maintained a seropositive level of anti-PvGAMA titre, whereas the patients PV01 and PV05 were seronegative (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, the monitoring of anti-PvGAMA responses at 12 months post-infection showed that those patients who were positive for anti-PvGAMA antibody at 9 months maintained their antibody responses (Fig. 3b).

Predominant IgG1 and IgG3 isotype responses to PvGAMA

The patterns of IgG class-switching are influenced by the potential of antigen steering in the immune reaction, including the route of the antigen for entering the body and the chemical composition of the antigen. In this study, IgG1 and IgG3 were the predominant isotype responses to PvGAMA. IgG1 and IgG3 responses were significantly higher in patients who were acutely infected with P. vivax than in healthy controls (Fig. 4a). Of the most acutely infected patients, 48.7 and 64.1% produced anti-PvGAMA IgG1 and anti-PvGAMA IgG3 in response to PvGAMA. The comparing the anti-PvGAMA IgG isotype responses to PvGAMA and PvDBPII revealed differential responses to these antigens. The IgG2 subclass was the major isotype produced in response to the PvDBPII antigen (Fig. 4b). As there was a maintenance of total IgG specific to PvGAMA post-infection, the monitoring of anti-PvGAMA IgG1 and anti-PvGAMA IgG3 in cross-sectional study showed that IgG1 and IgG3 responses started to decrease significantly at 3 months post-infection and tended to decrease continuously at 9 and 12 months (Fig. 4c). However, an analysis of anti-IgG3 PvGAMA antibody titre in individual level showed that 3 from 5 seropositive patients maintained IgG3 responses up to 12 months after anti-malarial treatment whereas anti-IgG1 PvGAMA antibody titre in all patients was not stable (Fig. 4d).
Fig. 4

IgG isotype responses to the PvGAMA antigen. The prevalence of the IgG isotype response to PvGAMA (a) and PvDBPII (b) in patients with acute P. vivax infection (n = 29) compared with healthy controls (n = 18). The stability of IgG1 and IgG3 antibody responses to PvGAMA was shown from cross-sectional study (c) and the monitoring in individuals (d) of acute infected patients (n = 5). Each symbol represents the IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4 titre of one individual. The solid line shows the median antibody titre in each group. The dotted line indicates the cut-off values

Cellular immune responses to PvGAMA

The differentiation of B cells can be triggered by two signaling pathways: namely, direct B cell triggering by the antigen itself or secondary signals from armed helper T cells. In this study, cytokine production was measured upon lymphocyte stimulation of in vitro cultures with PvGAMA or PvDBP. In P. vivax-infected PBMC’ cultures with rPVGAMA antigen, this antigen stimulated PBMCs to produce the cytokines IL-2 (PvGAMA = 166.0 ± 129.3 pg/mL; negative control = 78.1 ± 47.6 pg/mL; PHA = 285.64 ± 362.29 pg/mL), IFN-γ (PvGAMA = 80.5 ± 102.8 pg/mL; negative control = 25.9 ± 29.3 pg/mL; PHA = 242.91 ± 205.33 pg/mL) and IL-10 (PvGAMA = 220.7 ± 90.0 pg/mL; negative control = 28.5 ± 24.8 pg/mL; PHA = 328.57 ± 105.52 pg/mL); the cytokine levels were higher in antigen-stimulated cultures than in unstimulated control cultures (Fig. 5a–c). The ability of rPvGAMA-stimulated PBMCs to produce IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-10 was not significantly different from that of PBMCs stimulated with the recombinant PvDBPII antigen. PvGAMA-stimulated PBMC cultures from subjects who were in recovery from P. vivax infection showed significantly increased production of the cytokines IFN-γ (PvGAMA = 175.3 ± 229.1 pg/mL; negative control = 52.5 ± 79.7 pg/mL; PHA = 619.48 ± 351.53 pg/mL) and IL-10 (PvGAMA = 122.6 ± 99.9 pg/mL; negative control = 82.0 ± 89.1 pg/mL; PHA = 346.27 ± 194.04 pg/mL) (Fig. 5b, c).
Fig. 5

The cellular immune response to PvGAMA and PvDBP. PBMCs from patients with acute P. vivax infection (n = 11) and patients who had been in recovery from infection for 8–10 weeks (n = 11) were stimulated with recombinant PvGAMA or PvDBP in in vitro cultures for 5 days. The levels of a IL-2, b IFN-γ and c IL-10 were measured from cell culture supernatants upon rPvGAMA or rPvDBPII stimulation. Bars represent the median cytokine level of the study subjects

Discussion

Since P. vivax infection is not benign, as was considered previously, a vaccine against P. vivax is urgently needed in order to control and eradicate the disease. Because the P. vivax parasite has the unique ability to be reactivated from long-lasting, dormant liver stages called hypnozoites, the emerging of hypnozoites contribute to up to 80% of all P. vivax blood-stage infections and are responsible for the severity of the clinical symptoms of vivax malaria [16]. GPI-anchored antigens such as PvMSP-1, PvMSP-3, PvMSP-4, PvMSP-8, PvMSP-9, PvMSP-10, Pv12, Pv34, Pv38 and PvMSP1P have been proposed as vaccine candidates as they have the ability to trigger the immune response after natural P. vivax exposure and in vaccine-induced animal models [15, 1725]. PvGAMA is an adhesion molecule required for P. vivax to invade Duffy-positive and Duffy-negative human erythrocytes [13]. An in vitro study using an erythrocyte binding inhibition assay showed that antisera against PvGAMA prevented the binding of PvGAMA to erythrocytes. In this study, the immunogenicity of PvGAMA as vaccine candidate was demonstrated in infected patients and after anti-malarial treatment. The results indicate that PvGAMA antigen can elicit an immune response and a positive anti-PvGAMA response was maintained at post-infection.

Antibodies are one key component of naturally acquired protective immunity against blood-stage parasites. The specific antibodies function by inhibiting merozoite invasion into new red blood cells, by enhancing the merozoite susceptibility to phagocytosis and by blocking the adherence of infected red blood cells to endothelial cells [26]. High levels of antigenicity of PvGAMA in P. vivax infection were observed. The seroprevalence of anti-PvGAMA IgG responses were 95.0–57.1% from acute phase through 3–12 months post-infection, whereas the villagers who lived in malaria-endemic areas for at least 5 years did not produce anti-PvGAMA responses. This result is consistent with the recent study by Cheng et al. [13] that reported a strong IgG prevalence of PvGAMA-ectodomain in P. vivax-infected patients from Korea, Thailand, Myanmar and China. Among 7 regions of PvGAMA-ectodomain, the F2 and F7 regions were the strongest binding activity to erythrocytes [13]. However, the antibody responses against each PvGAMA region to prevent the binding to human erythrocytes as well as the target epitope of anti-PvGAMA inhibitory antibodies will be required for further study.

Although it is widely believed that anti-malarial antibodies may not be long-lived in the absence of re-exposure, the maintenance of antibody responses to malaria has been debated by several previous studies [27, 28]. Some studies in animal models have shown that MSP1-19-specific IgG-producing memory B cells and antibody-secreting cells are detectable for up to 8 months following a primary infection [29]. Upon re-infection, there is an enhanced B cell response, and these cells rapidly form a germinal centre and generate a large population of long-lived plasma cells [30]. In humans, several studies have demonstrated the longevity of antibody responses to the malaria antigen in an area of low transmission; both antibody and memory B cell responses to malaria antigens were found to be stably maintained over time [28, 31]. By contrast, studies carried out in areas of high malaria transmission have shown short-lived antibody responses to blood-stage antigens [3235]. However, there is no correlation between the level of malaria-specific antibody and memory B cells, since long-lasting Plasmodium-specific memory B cells were observed in exposed individuals who had short-lived antibody titres [27]. Here, the naturally acquired anti-PvGAMA response was observed in individuals during P. vivax infection and at 3, 9 and 12 months post-infection. The antibody response was greatly reduced at 3 months post-infection, and approximately 54% of the patients could maintain antibody responses, whereas 46% had become seronegative 3 months post-infection. Interestingly, anti-PvGAMA responses in some patients were appropriately maintained at seropositive levels at 9 months and 12 months in the absence of re-infection as the nested PCR of all recovery samples was shown negative at all period of monitoring. However, the anti-PvGAMA longevity by means of a cohort study that observed the association between clinical disease and maintenance of antibody responses in natural P. vivax exposure, as previously reported in other malaria antigens [3638] will be useful for the development of an anti-malarial vaccine.

Infection with a pathogen or immunization with a vaccine induces the production of antibodies that provide protection against the pathogen. The examination of the antibody isotypes produced by individuals in response to infection can help to characterize the immune responses to that specific pathogen. Each IgG isotype has a unique effector function in the context of an immune response. The Fc portion of the cytophilic isotypes IgG1 and IgG3 mediates effector functions such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) by co-operating with monocytes, via FcγRI and FcγRII receptors. Conversely, levels of the non-cytophilic isotypes IgG2 and IgG4 have been reported to be negatively correlated with anti-malarial protection [39]. In the current study, IgG1 and IgG3 were the predominant isotypes produced in response to PvGAMA antigen. The IgG3 response was stable, as indicated by the maintenance of the seropositivity during infection and post-infection in some seropositive individuals. Thus, the ability of patients maintained anti-IgG3 PvGAMA antibodies may protect clinical malaria as from previous studies had been shown the association between anti-IgG3 PfMSP1 antibodies and the prolonged period without malaria infection [18].

The collaboration between CD4+ T cells and B cells via the ligation of co-stimulatory molecules expressed on the surfaces of activated T cells is responsible for humoral immunity against most protein antigens. Two major subsets of CD4+ T cells, T helper cell 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells can promote different patterns of cytokine production, which result in distinct immune responses. In malaria disease, a balance between the Th1 and Th2 cytokines is critically required for determining parasitaemia or clinical outcome [26, 40, 41]. A protective role of IFN-γ against the blood stage of malaria had been shown in protected individuals living in malaria endemic areas [42, 43]. In this study, PvGAMA antigen-stimulated PBMCs from P. vivax-infected subjects were shown to produce a high-level of the cytokine IFN-γ. The induction of the IFN-γ in response to PvGAMA antigen may function by enhancing the production of PvGAMA-specific cytophilic IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies as the antibody responses of these two antibody subtypes increased during infection. The elevation of IFN-γ upon PvGAMA stimulation could help switching of IgG subclasses biased toward IgG1 and IgG3 responses to P. vivax parasites [44]. Moreover, the cytokine IL-10 was also detected in both PvDBP-stimulated and PvGAMA-stimulated PBMC culture supernatants. The elevation of IL-10 levels upon the re-stimulation with PvGAMA in vitro explained the development of IL-10 producing cell during P. vivax infection and these cells activated after re-stimulation with specific antigen. However, in this study, the IL-10-producing cells responded to PvGAMA were not identified. It is possible that source of IL-10 can be FOXP3+CD4+CD25+ T cells (Treg) as they were significantly expanded in acute infected P. falciparum and P. vivax patients [45, 46]. However, the function of IL-10 in malaria is still unclear as IL-10 producing CD4+ T cells were involved in dampening severe pathology during Plasmodium infection [45, 47, 48] whereas, it had also been reported to reduce levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α, which helps the parasites to escape the immune response [49]. In addition, IL-10 cytokine from PvGAMA stimulation may assist B cells in antibody production, as a previous study found that Plasmodium antigen-specific production of IL-10 was related to an antibody response [50].

Conclusions

In this study, the immunogenicity of the PvGAMA antigen was demonstrated during acute phase and post-infection with P. vivax. The high seroprevalence of PvGAMA, approximately 95%, was found in patients who were acutely infected with P. vivax. The monitoring of antibody responses to PvGAMA demonstrated that the antibody titre was appropriately maintained at a positive titre after anti-malarial treatment in the absence of reinfection. IgG3 isotype antibody was the major antibody produced in response to the PvGAMA antigen. The elevation of IFN-γ upon re-stimulation with PvGAMA was considered for Th1 response and promoting of IgG3 subtype switching. An increased understanding of the immunogenicity of PvGAMA could help in the development of a vaccine against P. vivax infection.

Abbreviations

PvGAMA: 

Plasmodium vivax glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored micronemal antigen

DARC: 

Duffy antigen receptor for chemokine

PBMCs: 

peripheral blood mononuclear cells

ELISA: 

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

LPA: 

lymphocyte proliferation assay

PHA: 

phytohemagglutinin

RPMI: 

Roswell Park Memorial Institute

TMB: 

tetramethylbenzidine

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SC designed and planned the study; measured total IgG and IgG isotype responses; performed the cytokine assay, statistical analysis and interpretation; and wrote the manuscript. JH performed the protein expression experiments. PC and EH designed and planned the study; reviewed the data; performed the analyses; made interpretations; and edited the final draft; KSH, WSP and SHH reviewed manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the staff at Tha Sae and Malaria Clinic, Vector Borne Disease Control 11.4, Chumphon Province, Thailand, for the collection of the samples used in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consents were taken in all of the participants.

Funding

This work was supported by the Golden Jubilee Ph.D. programme (5TMU58W1.PHD/0022/2558) and MRG6080230, by Thailand Research Funds, by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIP; NRF-2014R1A2A1A11052079), and by the Basic Science Research Program through the National NRF and funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2015R1A4A1038666).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University
(2)
Department of Medical Environmental Biology and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University
(3)
Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University
(4)
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University
(5)
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University

References

  1. Kelner KL. Toward malaria eradication. Science. 2016;354:843–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bassat Q, Velarde M, Mueller I, Lin J, Leslie T, Wongsrichanalai C, Baird JK. Key knowledge gaps for Plasmodium vivax control and elimination. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95:62–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Lopez C, Yepes-Perez Y, Hincapie-Escobar N, Diaz-Arevalo D, Patarroyo MA. What is known about the immune response induced by Plasmodium vivax malaria vaccine candidates? Front Immunol. 2017;8:126.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Chitnis CE, Chaudhuri A, Horuk R, Pogo AO, Miller LH. The domain on the Duffy blood group antigen for binding Plasmodium vivax and P. knowlesi malarial parasites to erythrocytes. J Exp Med. 1996;184:1531–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. King CL, Michon P, Shakri AR, Marcotty A, Stanisic D, Zimmerman PA, Cole-Tobian JL, Mueller I, Chitnis CE. Naturally acquired Duffy-binding protein-specific binding inhibitory antibodies confer protection from blood-stage Plasmodium vivax infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:8363–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ranjan A, Chitnis CE. Mapping regions containing binding residues within functional domains of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium knowlesi erythrocyte-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:14067–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Chootong P, Ntumngia FB, VanBuskirk KM, Xainli J, Cole-Tobian JL, Campbell CO, Fraser TS, King CL, Adams JH. Mapping epitopes of the Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein with naturally acquired inhibitory antibodies. Infect Immun. 2010;78:1089–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Grimberg BT, Udomsangpetch R, Xainli J, McHenry A, Panichakul T, Sattabongkot J, Cui L, Bockarie M, Chitnis C, Adams J, et al. Plasmodium vivax invasion of human erythrocytes inhibited by antibodies directed against the Duffy binding protein. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e337.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Gunalan K, Lo E, Hostetler JB, Yewhalaw D, Mu J, Neafsey DE, Yan G, Miller LH. Role of Plasmodium vivax Duffy-binding protein 1 in invasion of Duffy-null Africans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:6271–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilson PR, Nebl T, Vukcevic D, Moritz RL, Sargeant T, Speed TP, Schofield L, Crabb BS. Identification and stoichiometry of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Cell Proteom. 2006;5:1286–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlton JM, Adams JH, Silva JC, Bidwell SL, Lorenzi H, Caler E, Crabtree J, Angiuoli SV, Merino EF, Amedeo P, et al. Comparative genomics of the neglected human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Nature. 2008;455:757–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinds L, Green JL, Knuepfer E, Grainger M, Holder AA. Novel putative glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored micronemal antigen of Plasmodium falciparum that binds to erythrocytes. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8:1869–79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng Y, Lu F, Wang B, Li J, Han JH, Ito D, Kong DH, Jiang L, Wu J, Ha KS, et al. Plasmodium vivax GPI-anchored micronemal antigen (PvGAMA) binds human erythrocytes independent of Duffy antigen status. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35581.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang B, Han SS, Cho C, Han JH, Cheng Y, Lee SK, Galappaththy GN, Thimasarn K, Soe MT, Oo HW, et al. Comparison of microscopy, nested-PCR, and real-time-PCR assays using high-throughput screening of pooled samples for diagnosis of malaria in asymptomatic carriers from areas of endemicity in Myanmar. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:1838–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Changrob S, Leepiyasakulchai C, Tsuboi T, Cheng Y, Lim CS, Chootong P, Han ET. Naturally-acquired cellular immune response against Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein-1 paralog antigen. Malar J. 2015;14:159.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mueller I, Shakri AR, Chitnis CE. Development of vaccines for Plasmodium vivax malaria. Vaccine. 2015;33:7489–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Valderrama-Aguirre A, Quintero G, Gomez A, Castellanos A, Perez Y, Mendez F, Arevalo-Herrera M, Herrera S. Antigenicity, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of Plasmodium vivax MSP1 PV200l: a potential malaria vaccine subunit. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:16–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Versiani FG, Almeida ME, Mariuba LA, Orlandi PP, Nogueira PA. N-terminal Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein-1, a potential subunit for malaria vivax vaccine. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:965841.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang J, Barnwell JW, Meyer EV, Galinski MR. Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein-3 (PvMSP3): expression of an 11 member multigene family in blood-stage parasites. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e63888.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hostetler JB, Sharma S, Bartholdson SJ, Wright GJ, Fairhurst RM, Rayner JC. A library of Plasmodium vivax recombinant merozoite proteins reveals new vaccine candidates and protein–protein interactions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004264.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Perez-Leal O, Sierra AY, Barrero CA, Moncada C, Martinez P, Cortes J, Lopez Y, Torres E, Salazar LM, Patarroyo MA. Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein 8 cloning, expression, and characterisation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;324:1393–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Oliveira-Ferreira J, Vargas-Serrato E, Barnwell JW, Moreno A, Galinski MR. Immunogenicity of Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein-9 recombinant proteins expressed in E. coli. Vaccine. 2004;22:2023–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mongui A, Angel DI, Gallego G, Reyes C, Martinez P, Guhl F, Patarroyo MA. Characterization and antigenicity of the promising vaccine candidate Plasmodium vivax 34 kDa rhoptry antigen (Pv34). Vaccine. 2009;28:415–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mongui A, Angel DI, Guzman C, Vanegas M, Patarroyo MA. Characterisation of the Plasmodium vivax Pv38 antigen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;376:326–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cheng Y, Wang Y, Ito D, Kong DH, Ha KS, Chen JH, Lu F, Li J, Wang B, Takashima E, et al. The Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein 1 paralog is a novel erythrocyte-binding ligand of P. vivax. Infect Immun. 2013;81:1585–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Wipasa J, Elliott S, Xu H, Good MF. Immunity to asexual blood stage malaria and vaccine approaches. Immunol Cell Biol. 2002;80:401–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ndungu FM, Lundblom K, Rono J, Illingworth J, Eriksson S, Farnert A. Long-lived Plasmodium falciparum specific memory B cells in naturally exposed Swedish travelers. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43:2919–29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Wipasa J, Suphavilai C, Okell LC, Cook J, Corran PH, Thaikla K, Liewsaree W, Riley EM, Hafalla JC. Long-lived antibody and B cell memory responses to the human malaria parasites, Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000770.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ndungu FM, Cadman ET, Coulcher J, Nduati E, Couper E, Macdonald DW, Ng D, Langhorne J. Functional memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells are generated after a single Plasmodium chabaudi infection in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000690.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Stephens R, Ndungu FM, Langhorne J. Germinal centre and marginal zone B cells expand quickly in a second Plasmodium chabaudi malaria infection producing mature plasma cells. Parasite Immunol. 2009;31:20–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Nogaro SI, Hafalla JC, Walther B, Remarque EJ, Tetteh KK, Conway DJ, Riley EM, Walther M. The breadth, but not the magnitude, of circulating memory B cell responses to P. falciparum increases with age/exposure in an area of low transmission. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25582.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Branch OH, Udhayakumar V, Hightower AW, Oloo AJ, Hawley WA, Nahlen BL, Bloland PB, Kaslow DC, Lal AA. A longitudinal investigation of IgG and IgM antibody responses to the merozoite surface protein-1 19-kiloDalton domain of Plasmodium falciparum in pregnant women and infants: associations with febrile illness, parasitaemia, and anemia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;58:211–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dorfman JR, Bejon P, Ndungu FM, Langhorne J, Kortok MM, Lowe BS, Mwangi TW, Williams TN, Marsh K. B cell memory to 3 Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage antigens in a malaria-endemic area. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:1623–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kinyanjui SM, Conway DJ, Lanar DE, Marsh K. IgG antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens in Kenyan children have a short half-life. Malar J. 2007;6:82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Ceravolo IP, Sanchez BA, Sousa TN, Guerra BM, Soares IS, Braga EM, McHenry AM, Adams JH, Brito CF, Carvalho LH. Naturally acquired inhibitory antibodies to Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein are short-lived and allele-specific following a single malaria infection. Clin Exp Immunol. 2009;156:502–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Clark EH, Silva CJ, Weiss GE, Li S, Padilla C, Crompton PD, Hernandez JN, Branch OH. Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Peruvian Amazon, a region of low transmission, is associated with immunologic memory. Infect Immun. 2012;80:1583–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Koffi D, Varela ML, Loucoubar C, Beourou S, Vigan-Womas I, Toure A, Djaman JA, Toure AO, Perraut R. Longitudinal analysis of antibody responses in symptomatic malaria cases do not mirror parasite transmission in peri-urban area of Cote d’Ivoire between 2010 and 2013. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0172899.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Dodoo D, Aikins A, Kusi KA, Lamptey H, Remarque E, Milligan P, Bosomprah S, Chilengi R, Osei YD, Akanmori BD, Theisen M. Cohort study of the association of antibody levels to AMA1, MSP119, MSP3 and GLURP with protection from clinical malaria in Ghanaian children. Malar J. 2008;7:142.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Vidarsson G, Dekkers G, Rispens T. IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions. Front Immunol. 2014;5:520.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Butler NS, Harris TH, Blader IJ. Regulation of immunopathogenesis during Plasmodium and Toxoplasma infections: more parallels than distinctions? Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:593–602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Torre D, Speranza F, Giola M, Matteelli A, Tambini R, Biondi G. Role of Th1 and Th2 cytokines in immune response to uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002;9:348–51.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Sun P, Schwenk R, White K, Stoute JA, Cohen J, Ballou WR, Voss G, Kester KE, Heppner DG, Krzych U. Protective immunity induced with malaria vaccine, RTS, S, is linked to Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells producing IFN-gamma. J Immunol. 2003;171:6961–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lumsden JM, Schwenk RJ, Rein LE, Moris P, Janssens M, Ofori-Anyinam O, Cohen J, Kester KE, Heppner DG, Krzych U. Protective immunity induced with the RTS, S/AS vaccine is associated with IL-2 and TNF-alpha producing effector and central memory CD4 T cells. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e20775.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Bouharoun-Tayoun H, Oeuvray C, Lunel F, Druilhe P. Mechanisms underlying the monocyte-mediated antibody-dependent killing of Plasmodium falciparum asexual blood stages. J Exp Med. 1995;182:409–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jangpatarapongsa K, Chootong P, Sattabongkot J, Chotivanich K, Sirichaisinthop J, Tungpradabkul S, Hisaeda H, Troye-Blomberg M, Cui L, Udomsangpetch R. Plasmodium vivax parasites alter the balance of myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells and the induction of regulatory T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38:2697–705.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Torres KJ, Villasis E, Bendezu J, Chauca J, Vinetz JM, Gamboa D. Relationship of regulatory T cells to Plasmodium falciparum malaria symptomatology in a hypoendemic region. Malar J. 2014;13:108.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Zheng W, Wang QH, Feng H, Liu J, Meng HR, Cao YM. CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells prevent the development of Th1 immune response by inhibition of dendritic cell function during the early stage of Plasmodium yoelii infection in susceptible BALB/c mice. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2009;56:242–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Medina TS, Costa SP, Oliveira MD, Ventura AM, Souza JM, Gomes TF, Vallinoto AC, Povoa MM, Silva JS, Cunha MG. Increased interleukin-10 and interferon-gamma levels in Plasmodium vivax malaria suggest a reciprocal regulation which is not altered by IL-10 gene promoter polymorphism. Malar J. 2011;10:264.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Gomes PS, Bhardwaj J, Rivera-Correa J, Freire-De-Lima CG, Morrot A. Immune escape strategies of malaria parasites. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1617.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Luty AJ, Lell B, Schmidt-Ott R, Lehman LG, Luckner D, Greve B, Matousek P, Herbich K, Schmid D, Ulbert S, et al. Parasite antigen-specific interleukin-10 and antibody reponses predict accelerated parasite clearance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Eur Cytokine Netw. 1998;9:639–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement