Open Access

Molecular analysis demonstrates high prevalence of chloroquine resistance but no evidence of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh

  • Mohammad Shafiul Alam1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Benedikt Ley2,
  • Maisha Khair Nima1,
  • Fatema Tuj Johora3,
  • Mohammad Enayet Hossain1,
  • Kamala Thriemer2,
  • Sarah Auburn2,
  • Jutta Marfurt2,
  • Ric N. Price2, 4 and
  • Wasif A. Khan1
Malaria Journal201716:335

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1995-5

Received: 8 June 2017

Accepted: 10 August 2017

Published: 15 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Artemisinin resistance is present in the Greater Mekong region and poses a significant threat for current anti-malarial treatment guidelines in Bangladesh. The aim of this molecular study was to assess the current status of drug resistance in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh near the Myanmar border.

Methods

Samples were obtained from patients enrolled into a Clinical Trial (NCT02389374) conducted in Alikadam, Bandarban between August 2014 and January 2015. Plasmodium falciparum infections were confirmed by PCR and all P. falciparum positive isolates genotyped for the pfcrt K76T and pfmdr1 N86Y markers. The propeller region of the kelch 13 (k13) gene was sequenced from isolates from patients with delayed parasite clearance.

Results

In total, 130 P. falciparum isolates were available for analysis. The pfcrt mutation K76T, associated with chloroquine resistance was found in 81.5% (106/130) of cases and the pfmdr1 mutation N86Y in 13.9% (18/130) cases. No single nucleotide polymorphisms were observed in the k13 propeller region.

Conclusion

This study provides molecular evidence for the ongoing presence of chloroquine resistant P. falciparum in Bangladesh, but no evidence of mutations in the k13 propeller domain associated with artemisinin resistance. Monitoring for artemisinin susceptibility in Bangladesh is needed to ensure early detection and containment emerging anti-malarial resistance.

Keywords

Plasmodium falciparum Antimalarial drug resistance Molecular markers Single nucleotide polymorphism pfcrt pfmdr1 Artemisinin K13 propeller Bangladesh

Background

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 3.2 billion people are at risk of malaria worldwide, with a total of 214 million malaria cases reported in 2015 [1]. Malaria is endemic in 13 districts of Bangladesh and approximately 80% of all cases are reported from the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) on the south-eastern border with Myanmar [2]. More than 90% of all malaria cases are attributable to Plasmodium falciparum, with almost all other malaria cases are caused by Plasmodium vivax and mixed infections of both species [3]. Very few cases of Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale are reported from the CHT [4]. Rainy season (June–August) is considered as the peak transmission season of malaria in CHT [5]. A number of Anopheles spp. were found to be responsible for malaria transmission in CHT among those Anopheles jeyporiensis, An. maculatus, Anopheles vagus and Anopheles nivipes might be playing important roles [68].

Bangladesh adopted the artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) artemether–lumefantrine (AL) for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in 2004, as a consequence of increasing chloroquine resistance in P. falciparum [9], but it took another 3 years to implement this policy in the rural areas of the country [10].

A number of drug resistance mechanisms have been reported in P. falciparum [11, 12]. Chloroquine (CQ) resistance has primarily been associated with mutations in the gene encoding the P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene (pfcrt) [13], with additional minor determinants associated with polymorphisms of the P. falciparum multidrug resistance 1 gene (pfmdr1) [14, 15]. Pfmdr1 polymorphisms have also been associated with decreased susceptibility to amodiaquine (AQ), lumefantrine (LM) mefloquine (MQ) and artesunate (AS) [16, 17]. Copy number amplifications of the pfmdr1 gene have also been shown to reduce susceptibility to lumefantrine, as well as mefloquine [17, 18].

The first clinical reports of artemisinin resistance in P. falciparum were documented on the Thai–Cambodian border in 2003 and 2004 [1922], with subsequent genomic studies identifying mutations in the propeller domain of the Kelch gene (k13) as the key molecular marker [23]. Isolates with the k13 polymorphism exhibit increased survival rates in the presence of artemisinin in vitro and are associated with delayed parasite clearance times following ACT in vivo [23]. Other non-synonymous polymorphisms in mdr2 (multidrug resistance protein 2), crt (chloroquine resistance transporter), fd (ferredoxin) and arps10 (apicoplast ribosomal protein S10) genes may also be involved since artemisinin resistance [24].

Despite the withdrawal of routine CQ treatment more than 10 years ago, the prevalence of CQ resistance markers in P. falciparum remains high in Bangladesh. Recent studies report the presence of the CQ resistance-associated mutation K76T in the pfcrt gene in 82–100% of all clinical samples collected in the CHT [10, 2528], and the N86Y mutation in the pfmdr1 genes in 19–70% of clinical samples collected between 2002 and 2013 [10, 25, 27, 28]. However to date, there has been no evidence for reduced efficacy of ACT in Bangladesh. A study conducted on parasites collected between 2009 and 2013 identified a non-synonymous mutation (A578S) in the k13 gene in a single isolate in an endemic area of the CHT [29], but the C580Y mutation linked to delayed parasite clearance in Cambodian isolates was not present [23, 29]. Subsequent analyses have shown that the A578S allele is not associated with clinical or in vitro resistance to artemisinin [30].

Reduced artemisinin efficacy has been reported from neighbouring countries. A study conducted in 2013 in Kayin State, in south-eastern Myanmar found 26% of patients treated with AL were still parasitaemic on day 3. However, the same study found no evidence of delayed parasite clearance at a second site on the western Myanmar border with Bangladesh [31]. Another study conducted between 2013 and 2014 reported mutations in the K13 propeller region in 6.9 and 3.2% of samples collected in Rakhine and Chin State of Myanmar, both bordering Bangladesh, but no mutant isolates were detected in cross-border samples from the CHT [32]. A recent study from India confirmed the presence of F446I, A578S and K189T mutations in Mizoram and Tripura states which are close to the Bangladeshi border [33].

The objective of this study was to assess the present status of molecular variants suggestive of artemisinin resistance and ongoing CQ drug resistance in P. falciparum samples collected in the CHT.

Methods

Study area and population

Parasite isolates were collected from patients enrolled into a prospective, health care facility-based observational study to assess the efficacy of the current anti-malarial policy conducted in Alikadam, a sub-district of Bandarban district in the CHT. The study was conducted between September 2014 and January 2015 [34]. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Ethical Review Committee of icddr,b (PR-14053) and the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research, Australia (HREC2014-2228) as part of a clinical trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02389374.

Sample storage and DNA extraction

Approximately 5 ml of whole blood were collected from participants enrolled in the clinical study; samples were preserved in EDTA tubes and stored at −20 °C for subsequent molecular analysis. DNA was extracted from 200 µl whole blood using the QiaAmp blood mini kit (QIAGEN, Inc., Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA of all samples was preserved at −20 °C until use.

Species identification

Plasmodium species was confirmed by nested PCR following standard protocols [35] with minor modifications in the thermal cycles (35 cycles for Nest-1 and 40 cycles for Nest-2). Two genus specific primers were used to amplify 18ssrRNA gene and then species specific primers were used to amplify size specific portions of the ssrRNA sequence of Nest 1 that corresponds to P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae and P. ovale.

Genotyping of pfcrt and pfmdr1

The presence of the pfcrt (K76T) and pfmdr1 (N86Y) mutations were assessed in all isolates using PCR–RFLP, following the protocol of Veiga et al. [36] with modifications to the extension temperature from 72 °C to 68 °C for pfmdr1.

Sequencing of the k13 propeller gene

The presence of k13 mutations was assessed in a subset of 10 samples which exhibited the longest parasite clearance times recorded in the clinical study. The time interval between drug administration and first negative malaria slide was determined as parasite clearance time. [34]. The k13 propeller gene region was amplified by nested PCR following the procedures described by Ariey et al. [23]. The nest-1 product was amplified with an expected product size of 849 bp and purified by ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix). Amplified products were sequenced using the Sanger sequencing method on an ABI3500 Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies). Both forward and reverse strands were sequenced to identify and confirm variants. The BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor (ver. 7.0.9.0) was used to analyse the sequences. The sequences were aligned against the P. falciparum 3D7 strain (PF3D7_1343700, PlasmoDB Release 28) using ClustalO [37, 38].

All molecular analysis were performed at the Emerging Infections and Parasitology Laboratory of icddr,b. k13 sequencing was performed at the Virology Laboratory of icddr,b.

Genotyping to characterize recurrent infections

Two patients had recurrent P. falciparum parasitaemia after the follow up period of the primary study had ended [34], 32 and 36 days after the diagnosis of their initial infection. To assess whether the recurrent cases represented recrudescence or re-infection events, genotyping was conducted at the msp1 (K1 of Block-2), msp2 (3D7 of central domain), and glurp loci following standard protocols [39, 40]. Taq polymerase, PCR buffer, dNTPs and restriction enzymes were sourced from New England BioLabs Inc, USA and a Bio-Rad C1000 thermal cycler was used for amplification. Nested amplicons and post-RFLP products were visualized under UV light on a Biorad gel documentation system after 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining.

Following the WHO PCR-adjustment interpretation guidelines, recurrent infections were classified as homologous (recrudescent) if at least one allele was shared with the primary infection at each locus, and heterologous (re-infection) if no alleles were shared with the primary infection at 1 or more loci.

Results

Of the 181 patients enrolled in the clinical, 180 samples (99.4%) were available for molecular analysis, of which 130 (72.2%) were confirmed as P. falciparum by PCR (119 P. falciparum mono-infection and 11 mixed infection with P. vivax). Two (1.6%) patients out of 122 were still parasitaemic on day 2 and were only seen again on day 6, by then they were aparasitaemic [34]. The median parasite clearance time was 22 h (range 14–40) [34], with ten isolates exhibiting clearance times greater than median parasite clearance times 22 h (range 24 to >48). Two patients had recurrent parasitaemia after the end of the study (day 32 and day 36 days), both of which were categorized as new infections by 3 loci genotyping.

Plasmodium falciparum drug resistant markers

pfcrt and pfmdr1 genotyping was successful in all of the 130 P. falciparum isolates. The pfcrt 76T mutation was present in 106 (81.5%) samples, with no sample indicating a mixed infection with both allelic variants. The pfmdr1 86Y mutation was present in 8 (6.15%) isolates, with an additional 10 (7.69%) isolates having a mixed infection with the 86Y and wild-type 86N allele. The 10 isolates from patients with prolonged parasite clearance times underwent sequencing of the k13 gene. No synonymous and non-synonymous mutations were observed in k13 in any of these isolates. All ten sequences were submitted to GenBank (Accession Numbers KY274188–KY274197).

Discussion

The molecular analysis of isolates collected from patients with clinical malaria in the Chittagong Hill Tribes of Bangladesh highlights a high prevalence of pfcrt mutations, but reassuringly absence of the K13 mutations associated with artemisinin resistance. These findings concur with the corresponding clinical results published previously [34].

Although CQ was removed from the national treatment guidelines for P. falciparum malaria more than 10 years ago, the prevalence of CQ resistant P. falciparum strains remains high [10, 2527, 41, 42]. In Malawi, Tanzania, Zambia and Grande Comore, CQ sensitive strains have become the predominant strains of P. falciparum 6–10 years after the withdrawal of CQ [4348], but these reports have been in locations where chloroquine has been almost completely removed from the market, including the private sector. Similar observations of the reversion to chloroquine sensitivity have not been widely reported in Asian countries [27, 28, 32, 4951]. In Bangladesh, CQ continues to be available in drug stores for self-treatment of malaria and for the treatment of P. vivax, and this drug use may have maintained CQ pressure on the local P. falciparum population, explaining the high prevalence of pfcrt 76T mutants in this study. The rate of 76T pfcrt mutations reported in this study population was comparable to rates reported from other areas of the CHT [10, 2527].

None of the samples selected for sequencing of the k13 gene had any single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the propeller region indicative of reduced artemisinin sensitivity. The corresponding median parasite clearance times of 22 h (IQR 15.2–27.3 h) [34] and the lack of any treatment failure within 28 days of artemether lumefantrine suggest that the current malaria treatment guidelines for P. falciparum malaria remain highly effective. This result is in congruence with previously published data where almost all the patients were afebrile within 48 h [34].

Moderate prevalence of pfmdr1 N86Y mutations have been reported earlier in studies conducted in Bangladesh [10, 27, 28, 52], however, the prevalence of this mutation in the current study was considerably lower. N86Y favours resistance to the aminoquinoline class of anti-malarial drugs including CQ [53]. Paradoxically, exposure to LUM may create selective pressure on the 86N wild type allele [54]. Thus, the results of our study reflects a selective force of ACT on 86N which may alter sensitivity to the drug.

If artemisinin resistance spreads westwards from the Mekong region, the CHT may be among the first areas affected of the Indian subcontinent. The recent influx of migrants from areas with a high prevalence of P. falciparum strains with reduced susceptibility to artemisinin, such as the bordering states of Rakhine and Chin in Myanmar [18], therefore, poses a significant threat to malaria control in this region. Furthermore Bangladesh continues to play a vital role in UN peacekeeping mission in sub-Saharan Africa, thereby providing a potential route for the spread of artemisinin resistance to the African continent [55]. Thus, constant monitoring of local anti-malarial drug efficacy in this region is vital to detect and prevent the spread of artemisinin resistance.

Conclusion

The present study provides molecular evidence for the presence of CQ resistant P. falciparum in Bangladesh, but reassuringly no evidence of the key k13 mutations associated with artemisinin resistance. Although the clinical and molecular data suggest that the current malaria treatment guidelines for P. falciparum remain highly effective, close monitoring for artemisinin and lumefantrine resistance will be critical in this malaria endemic area.

Abbreviations

WHO: 

World Health Organization

pfmdr1

Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance 1

pfcrt

Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter

AL: 

artemether–lumefantrine

CQ: 

chloroquine

CQR: 

chloroquine resistant

ACT: 

artemisinin-based combination therapy

DNA: 

deoxyribonucleic acid

dNTP: 

nucleoside triphosphate

MQ: 

mefloquine

SNP: 

single-nucleotide polymorphism

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

RFLP: 

restriction fragment length polymorphism

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MSA, BL, KT, RNP and WAK designed the study. MKN, FTJ and MEH executed the study. MSA, BL, MKN and FTJ analyzed the data. MSA, BL, MKN, FTJ, SA and JM drafted the manuscript. All authors read, revised and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

icddr,b acknowledges with gratitude the commitment of Menzies School of Health Research on its research efforts. icddr,b is also grateful to the Governments of Bangladesh, Canada, Sweden and the UK for providing core/unrestricted support.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available to all interested researchers upon request.

Consent for publication

All authors have given their consent for publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The clinical trial [34] was registered at clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT02389374. The study was approved by the Research Review Committee and Ethical Review Committee of ICDDR,B (PR-14053) and the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research, Australia (HREC2014-2228). Written informed consent was obtained from all adult subjects, and assent was obtained from the legal guardians in the case of minor subjects before the collection of a blood sample.

Funding

The clinical study from which samples for this study were derived was funded by the Malaria Elimination Initiative at the Global Health Group of the University of California, San Francisco. The work of the Malaria Elimination Initiative at the Global Health Group of the University of California, San Francisco is supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1089413).

This research study was supported by Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia. BL is funded by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Grant Agreement Number 72904), BL and KT are funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPRA-OPP1054404). RNP is funded by the Wellcome Trust (Senior Fellowship in Clinical Science, 200909).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Diseases Research
(2)
Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University
(3)
Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka
(4)
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global technical strategy for Malaria 2016–2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Haque U, Overgaard HJ, Clements AC, Norris DE, Islam N, Karim J, et al. Malaria burden and control in Bangladesh and prospects for elimination: an epidemiological and economic assessment. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e98–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Haque U, Ahmed SM, Hossain S, Huda M, Hossain A, Alam MS, et al. Malaria prevalence in endemic districts of Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6737.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Starzengruber P, Fuehrer HP, Ley B, Thriemer K, Swoboda P, Habler VE, et al. High prevalence of asymptomatic malaria in south-eastern Bangladesh. Malar J. 2014;13:16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Maude RJ, Hasan MU, Hossain MA, Sayeed AA, Paul SK, Rahman W, et al. Temporal trends in severe malaria in Chittagong, Bangladesh. Malar J. 2012;11:323.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Alam MS, Chakma S, Khan WA, Glass GE, Mohon AN, Elahi R, et al. Diversity of anopheline species and their Plasmodium infection status in rural Bandarban, Bangladesh. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:150.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Alam MS, Khan MGM, Chaudhury N, Deloer S, Nazib F, Bangali AM, et al. Prevalence of anopheline species and their Plasmodium infection status in epidemic-prone border areas of Bangladesh. Malar J. 2010;9:15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Al-Amin HM, Elahi R, Mohon AN, Kafi MAH, Chakma S, Lord JS, et al. Role of underappreciated vectors in malaria transmission in an endemic region of Bangladesh-India border. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:195.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. DGHS B. Strategic plan for malaria control Programme Bangladesh; 2008.Google Scholar
  10. Marma AS, Mita T, Eto H, Tsukahara T, Sarker S, Endo H. High prevalence of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine resistance alleles in Plasmodium falciparum parasites from Bangladesh. Parasitol Int. 2010;59:178–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Woodrow CJ, White NJ. The clinical impact of artemisinin resistance in Southeast Asia and the potential for future spread. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017;41:34–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ibraheem ZO, Abd Majid R, Noor SM, Sedik HM, Basir R. Role of different Pfcrt and Pfmdr-1 mutations in conferring resistance to antimalaria drugs in Plasmodium falciparum. Malar Res Treat. 2014;2014:950424.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Ecker A, Lehane AM, Clain J, Fidock DA. PfCRT and its role in antimalarial drug resistance. Trends Parasitol. 2012;28:504–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Duraisingh MT, Cowman AF. Contribution of the pfmdr1 gene to antimalarial drug-resistance. Acta Trop. 2005;94:181–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Reed MB, Saliba KJ, Caruana SR, Kirk K, Cowman AF. Pgh1 modulates sensitivity and resistance to multiple antimalarials in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2000;403:906–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eyase FL, Akala HM, Ingasia L, Cheruiyot A, Omondi A, Okudo C, et al. The role of Pfmdr1 and Pfcrt in changing chloroquine, amodiaquine, mefloquine and lumefantrine susceptibility in western-Kenya P. falciparum samples during 2008–2011. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e64299.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, Brockman A, McGready R, Ashley E, Phaipun L, et al. Mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and increased pfmdr1 gene copy number. Lancet. 2004;364:438–47.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Sidhu ABS, Uhlemann AC, Valderramos SG, Valderramos JC, Krishna S, Fidock DA. Decreasing pfmdr1 copy number in Plasmodium falciparum malaria heightens susceptibility to mefloquine, lumefantrine, halofantrine, quinine, and artemisinin. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:528–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, Smith BL, Socheat D, Fukuda MM. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2619–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, et al. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:455–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Vijaykadga S, Rojanawatsirivej C, Cholpol S, Phoungmanee D, Nakavej A, Wongsrichanalai C. In vivo sensitivity monitoring of mefloquine monotherapy and artesunate–mefloquine combinations for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Thailand in 2003. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:211–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jambou R, Legrand E, Niang M, Khim N, Lim P, Volney B, et al. Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum field isolates to in vitro artemether and point mutations of the SERCA-type PfATPase6. Lancet. 2005;366:1960–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois AC, Khim N, et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2014;505:50–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Miotto O, Amato R, Ashley EA, MacInnis B, Almagro-Garcia J, Amaratunga C, et al. Genetic architecture of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Genet. 2015;47:226–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. van den Broek IV, van der Wardt S, Talukder L, Chakma S, Brockman A, Nair S, et al. Drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum from the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9:680–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawai A, Arita N, Matsumoto Y, Kawabata M, Chowdhury MS, Saito-Ito A. Efficacy of chloroquine plus primaquine treatment and pfcrt mutation in uncomplicated falciparum malaria patients in Rangamati,Bangladesh. Parasitol Int. 2011;60:341–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Akter J, Thriemer K, Khan WA, Sullivan DJ, Noedl H, Haque R. Genotyping of Plasmodium falciparum using antigenic polymorphic markers and to study anti-malarial drug resistance markers in malaria endemic areas of Bangladesh. Malar J. 2012;11:386.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Srimuang K, Miotto O, Lim P, Fairhurst RM, Kwiatkowski DP, Woodrow CJ, et al. Analysis of anti-malarial resistance markers in pfmdr1 and pfcrt across Southeast Asia in the tracking resistance to artemisinin collaboration. Malar J. 2016;15:541.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohon AN, Alam MS, Bayih AG, Folefoc A, Shahinas D, Haque R, et al. Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum K13 propeller gene from Bangladesh (2009–2013). Malar J. 2014;13:431.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Menard D, Khim N, Beghain J, Adegnika AA, Shafiul-Alam M, Amodu O, et al. A worldwide map of Plasmodium falciparum K13-propeller polymorphisms. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2453–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Nyunt MH, Hlaing T, Oo HW, Tin-Oo LLK, Phway HP, Wang B, et al. Molecular assessment of artemisinin resistance markers, polymorphisms in the K13 propeller, and a multidrug-resistance gene in the eastern and western border areas of Myanmar. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;60:1208–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tun KM, Imwong M, Lwin KM, Win AA, Hlaing TM, Hlaing T, et al. Spread of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Myanmar: a cross-sectional survey of the K13 molecular marker. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:415–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Mishra N, Bharti RS, Mallick P, Singh OP, Srivastava B, Rana R, et al. Emerging polymorphisms in falciparum kelch 13 gene in Northeastern region of India. Malar J. 2016;15:583.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Ley B, Alam MS, Thriemer K, Hossain MS, Kibria MG, Auburn S, et al. G6PD deficiency and antimalarial efficacy for uncomplicated malaria in Bangladesh: a prospective observational study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0154015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Zhu XP, Jarra W, Pinheiro L, do Rosario V, et al. High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;61:315–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Veiga MI, Ferreira PE, Bjorkman A, Gil JP. Multiplex PCR-RFLP methods for pfcrt, pfmdr1 and pfdhfr mutations in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Cell Probes. 2006;20:100–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Goujon M, McWilliam H, Li W, Valentin F, Squizzato S, Paern J, et al. A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL–EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W695–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Alam MS, Elahi R, Mohon AN, Al-Amin HM, Kibria MG, Khan WA, et al. Plasmodium falciparum genetic diversity in Bangladesh does not suggest a hypoendemic population structure. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94:1245–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Snounou G, Zhu X, Siripoon N, Jarra W, Thaithong S, Brown KN, et al. Biased distribution of msp1 and msp2 allelic variants in Plasmodium falciparum populations in Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999;93:369–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Noedl H, Faiz M, Yunus E, Rahman M, Hossain M, Samad R, et al. Drug-resistant malaria in Bangladesh: an in vitro assessment. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:140–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Thriemer K, Haque R, Wagatsuma Y, Salam MA, Akther S, Attlmayr B, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of quinine plus sulfadoxine–pyremethamine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:645–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Laufer MK, Thesing PC, Eddington ND, Masonga R, Dzinjalamala FK, Takala SL, et al. Return of chloroquine antimalarial efficacy in Malawi. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1959–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mohammed A, Ndaro A, Kalinga A, Manjurano A, Mosha JF, Mosha DF, et al. Trends in chloroquine resistance marker, Pfcrt-K76T mutation ten years after chloroquine withdrawal in Tanzania. Malar J. 2013;12:415.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Mwanza S, Joshi S, Nambozi M, Chileshe J, Malunga P, Kabuya JB, et al. The return of chloroquine-susceptible Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zambia. Malar J. 2016;15:584.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Huang B, Wang Q, Deng C, Wang J, Yang T, Huang S, et al. Prevalence of crt and mdr-1 mutations in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Grande Comore island after withdrawal of chloroquine. Malar J. 2016;15:414.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Frosch AE, Venkatesan M, Laufer MK. Patterns of chloroquine use and resistance in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of household survey and molecular data. Malar J. 2011;10:116.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Gharbi M, Flegg J, Hubert V, Kendjo E, Metcalf J, Guerin PJ, et al. Longitudinal study assessing the return of chloroquine susceptibility of Plasmodiun falciparum isolates from travelers returning from West Africa. Malar J. 2012;11:P38.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Duru V, Witkowski B, Menard D. Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin derivatives and piperaquine: a major challenge for malaria elimination in Cambodia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95:1228–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Chatterjee M, Ganguly S, Saha P, Guha SK, Basu N, Bera DK, et al. Polymorphisms in Pfcrt and Pfmdr-1 genes after five years withdrawal of chloroquine for the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in West Bengal, India. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;44:281–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Takahashi N, Tanabe K, Tsukahara T, Dzodzomenyo M, Dysoley L, Khamlome B, et al. Large-scale survey for novel genotypes of Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine-resistance gene pfcrt. Malar J. 2012;11:92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Pickard AL, Wongsrichanalai C, Purfield A, Kamwendo D, Emery K, Zalewski C, et al. Resistance to antimalarials in Southeast Asia and genetic polymorphisms in pfmdr1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:2418–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Duraisingh MT, Jones P, Sambou I, von Seidlein L, Pinder M, Warhurst DC. The tyrosine-86 allele of the pfmdr1 gene of Plasmodium falciparum is associated with increased sensitivity to the anti-malarials mefloquine and artemisinin. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000;108:13–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sisowath C, Strömberg J, Mårtensson A, Msellem M, Obondo C, Björkman A, et al. In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 86 N coding alleles by artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem). J Infect Dis. 2005;191:1014–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Peacekeeping UN. UN Mission’s Summary detailed by Country; 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement