Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Molecular identification of Plasmodium species responsible for malaria reveals Plasmodium vivax isolates in Duffy negative individuals from southwestern Nigeria

Malaria Journal201817:439

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2588-7

  • Received: 12 September 2018
  • Accepted: 22 November 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Malaria in Nigeria is principally due to Plasmodium falciparum and, to a lesser extent to Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale. Plasmodium vivax is thought to be absent in Nigeria in particular and sub-Saharan Africa in general, due to the near fixation of the Duffy negative gene in this population. Nevertheless, there are frequent reports of P. vivax infection in Duffy negative individuals in the sub-region, including reports from two countries sharing border with Nigeria to the west (Republic of Benin) and east (Cameroon). Additionally, there were two cases of microscopic vivax-like malaria from Nigerian indigenous population. Hence molecular surveillance of the circulating Plasmodium species in two states (Lagos and Edo) of southwestern Nigeria was carried out.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey between September 2016 and March 2017 was conducted. 436 febrile patients were included for the present work. Venous blood of these patients was subjected to RDT as well as microscopy. Further, parasite DNA was isolated from positive samples and PCR diagnostic was employed followed by direct sequencing of the 18S rRNA of Plasmodium species as well as sequencing of a portion of the promoter region of the Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines. Samples positive for P. vivax were re-amplified several times and finally using the High Fidelity Taq to rule out any bias introduced.

Results

Of the 256 (58.7%) amplifiable malaria parasite DNA, P. falciparum was, as expected, the major cause of infection, either alone 85.5% (219/256; 97 from Edo and 122 from Lagos), or mixed with P. malariae 6.3% (16/256) or with P. vivax 1.6% (4/256). Only one of the five P. vivax isolates was found to be a single infection. DNA sequencing and subsequent alignment of the 18S rRNA of P. vivax with the reference strains displayed very high similarities (100%). Remarkably, the T-33C was identified in all P. vivax samples, thus confirming that all vivax-infected patients in the current study are Duffy negative.

Conclusion

The present study gave the first molecular evidence of P. vivax in Nigeria in Duffy negative individuals. Though restricted to two states; Edo in South–South and Lagos in South-west Nigeria, the real burden of this species in Nigeria and sub-Saharan Africa might have been underestimated, hence there is need to put in place a country-wide, as well as a sub-Saharan Africa-wide surveillance and appropriate control measures.

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • Plasmodium vivax
  • Duffy negative
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Lagos
  • Edo

Background

Malaria is a principal infectious disease that continues to be a worldwide cause of mortality in endemic countries such as Nigeria. Concerted malaria intervention effort has led to a substantial gain in the reduction of global malaria cases and mortality to 41% and 62%, respectively, since 2000 [1]. However, a recent World Health Organization (WHO) report recorded that this progress has stalled and even reversed in some regions. The African Region account for about 91% of the global malaria mortality in 2016 [2]. In Nigeria, malaria remains a major public health problem and accounts for 27% of the global burden of malaria. It is estimated that 122,000 malaria associated deaths occur each year in the country [2, 3].

Malaria diagnosis remains a big challenge in malaria control and elimination and performance of different diagnostic tools differ in different epidemiological settings [4]. Microscopy which is the gold standard for malaria diagnosis can detect Plasmodium infections in individuals with high level of parasitaemia, however parasite detection in individuals carrying low parasite density can be challenging [5], thus emphasizing the need for more sensitive diagnostic methods. Needless to mention misinterpretation of blood smears by microscopists, inability to detect mixed species infection (as well as distinguish P. ovale from P. vivax) [6, 7], lower detection limit of parasites (between 4 and 20 parasites/µl for an expert microscopist and 50–100 parasites/µl for an average microscopist) [8, 9], and unstable power supply [10], are all drawbacks of microscopy.

In recent times, various molecular techniques have been used to detect Plasmodium species, with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) being the most frequently used method [1113]. Additionally, it has also been helpful in revealing the high prevalence of mixed infections [1417] as well as the detection of parasites otherwise not detected in the peripheral blood circulation due to sequestration.

Of the five Plasmodium species, infecting humans [18], P. falciparum is the most widely spread in Africa and causes the most severe form of the disease worldwide [2]. Hence, most malaria interventions in Africa have focused on P. falciparum. This unalloyed attention to falciparum malaria control interventions should be looked into as a result of the following reasons: (i) vivax malaria (as well as P. ovale) is less flexible to manage and may survive for a prolonged period as a result of the hypnozoite stage, thus serving as a reservoir of infection [19], (ii) P. vivax has a larger global distribution, and the number of people at risk of contracting it is more than that of P. falciparum. Hence, its incursion into sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) gives it a much wider distribution from a global perspective [20], (iii) lastly it can also provoke severe symptoms in infected patients [21].

Plasmodium vivax malaria has been presumed absent in SSA due to the fact that the Duffy antigen, the erythrocyte receptor for P. vivax merozoite invasion, is not expressed on the red blood cells of most populations in SSA, as revealed by the seminal work of Miller and colleagues, therefore are thought to be protected against vivax malaria [22]. Although a very recent findings point to another receptor on the recticulocyte-the transferrin receptor 1 as a specific P. vivax receptor [23]. The protein encoded by the DARC-coding gene (or ‘Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines’, DARC) is a glycosylated membrane protein that is located on the long arm of chromosome 1 (1.q22–1.q23). The expression of the DARC-coding gene on erythrocytes is connected to a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (− 33T>C) in the promoter region of the DARC-coding gene on chromosome 1. In homozygous carriers (− 33CC) the DARC-coding gene on the erythrocytes is not expressed and as such are referred to as Duffy-negative [24, 25]. Plasmodium vivax is predominantly found in Asia, Latin America and the Horn of Africa where the majority of the population is Duffy positive [26]. Recent studies indicate that vivax malaria may be found in SSA, in Duffy positive, but also in Duffy negative individuals, or in individuals whose DARC status was not characterized [24, 2637]. Although, recent evidence abounds [38, 39] supporting the origin of P. vivax from vivax-like malaria from Africa in non-human primates. However, some scientists have opined that the source of vivax malaria in SSA could be from the different migrational pattern especially along trade pathway [40]. Although, all of the aforementioned hypotheses seem credible, the precise route of entry or exit of P. vivax to/from Africa need further detailed study. Nevertheless, it seems more than one of the presumptions might be at play here.

Two things are at play from the above: vivax-infected Duffy positive individuals serving as reservoir of infection for the Duffy negative individuals [24]; and the possibility of the development of alternative receptors (such as the newly discovered transferrin 1 receptor) other than the DARC-coding protein on the surface of the erythrocytes for binding and invasion of RBCs by P. vivax [23, 36].

Studies conducted in the northern part of Nigeria attempting to characterize Duffy blood groups estimated 19.2% and 5.6% of the general population and pregnant women, respectively, to be Duffy positive [25, 41], thus providing a reservoir for vivax malaria, which could then be transmitted to Duffy negative people. Of special importance is the detection of vivax malaria in the Republic of Benin and Cameroon, both of which share border with Nigeria to the west and east, respectively [29, 32, 33].

In Nigeria, P. falciparum accounts for > 95% of malaria infection, while P. malariae and P. ovale are estimated to be responsible for < 5% of infection [1, 2]. To date, available data in Nigeria associated with P. vivax points to the case of a pregnant Nigerian female, visiting the country briefly from Italy where she resides and was diagnosed of mixed vivax infection [42], and other microscopically positive cases unconfirmed by any molecular technique [43, 44]. Additionally, in order to make informed epidemiological decisions, an accurate documentation of mixed species is important. Furthermore, with the observed reduction in the burden of falciparum malaria, there should be a shift of focus or effort concerted in controlling non-falciparum malaria, accounting for about four hundred million cases world-wide [21].

This study was designed to confirm the different species detected by RDT and microscopy using PCR as the gold standard, to sequence the P. vivax isolates in the study areas, and to determine the DARC status of P. vivax-infected patients.

Methods

Study sites

Samples were collected from Lagos and Edo states, both of which are located on the western and southern part of Nigeria respectively. Lagos state shares a border with the Republic of Benin. In Lagos state, samples were collected from four different Local Government Areas (LGAs) namely Eti-osa (06°26′N 003°29′E), Ibeju (06°26′N 003°56′E), Kosofe (06°28′N 003°22′E) and Ikorodu (06°33′N 003°35′E) LGA, while in Edo state, samples were collected from two LGAs: Oredo (06°19I′N 5°34′E) and Ikpoba Okha (06°16′N 5°68′E).

Lagos state is hypo-endemic in most part with a 1.9% prevalence rate in children age 6–59 months [2, 45]. This in part is due to the expansion of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) coverage, occurrence of indoor residual spraying (IRS) in many of its LGAs [43, 46].

Edo state on the other hand is meso-endemic with a prevalence rate of 35% in children age 6–59 months [2, 45, 47]. This meso-endemic nature on the other hand has been shown to be due to low utilization of malaria control interventions such as ITNs and intermittent preventive therapy (IPT) among the population [48].

Generally, the rainfall pattern of the two states has little or no variation with an annual rainfall of 1400–1800 mm and a short break called “August break’. There are two climatic conditions predominant in both study locations, the dry season (lasting from November to March) and the wet season (from April to October), with a temperature range of 30–38 °C [49]. Malaria transmission normally occurs throughout the year with its peak transmission occurring during the raining season [46, 47] and mostly transmitted by Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) and Anopheles funestus s.s [2, 50, 51].

Study design

The study was a cross-sectional investigation involving patients presenting clinical symptoms of malaria and visiting any of the various hospitals in both study sites between September 2016 to March 2017. The inclusion criteria were patients that were ≥ 2 years of age, clinical symptoms of malaria detected by a febrile condition of ≥ 37.5 °C while the non-inclusion criteria were being pregnant and having complicated infections.

Employing convenience sampling, a total of 2376 consenting patients were recruited from all study sites after detailed briefing of the purpose of the study. All study subjects were initially screened using P. falciparum specific HRP2 RDT kits (Care Start®, Access Bio Inc, Batch number M014L04–M014M10 henceforth referred to as just RDT). Those found positive by this initial diagnostic test were further screened by microscopy and subsequently by nested PCR. From the pool of samples that were negative by both RDT and microscopy, 136 were randomly selected by taking every fifth, seventh or tenth negative samples (depending on the study location and sample size) and were all subjected to PCR (Fig. 1). During this study, care providers of each hospital assumed absolute responsibility for patient care; all decisions relating to diagnosis and treatment were done irrespective of research protocol and outcome.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Flow chart of sample processing. A total of 300 samples were positive by RDT out of which only 135 and 256 turned out positive by microscopy and PCR respectively. From the pool of 136 randomly selected negative samples, 33 more turned out positive by PCR

Sample collection and preparation

Venous blood collected from each consenting/assenting patients was kept in ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) containers corresponding to a patient’s unique identity for RDT and subsequent microscopy and PCR analysis. Following the manufacturer’s instruction, Care Start® P.f (Access Bio Inc, USA), which only detects the histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP-2) of P. falciparum, was used to carry out a rapid diagnosis following the manufacturer’s instruction, and those samples found positive by this preliminary test were processed further.

Parasitological examination and parasite density determination

Preparation of thin and thick blood films and determination of parasites density followed a previous protocol [52]. Briefly, thin and thick smears were made for each sample collected in EDTA, the thin film was fixed in methanol and both films were dried and stained with Giemsa and examined under oil immersion at the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research. Each positive thick smear was counted against a minimum of 500 leucocytes and evaluation of parasite density done using the estimated 8000 white blood cells (WBCs)/μl of whole blood while the thin smear was used for species identification, following the formula below.
$${\text{PD}}\, = \,\left( {{\text{NPC}} \times 8000} \right)/{\text{N}}_{\text{WBCs}}$$
PD = parasite density; NPC = number of parasites counted; NWBCs = number of white blood cells (fixed to 500).

DNA extraction

Blood spots from positive (RDT and/or microscopy) as well as negative (few selected RDT and microscopy) samples collected from consenting patients were made on Whatmann® filter paper (GE Healthcare, Life Sciences) and allowed to dry at room temperature. Each filter paper was kept in a zip-locked sachet with silica gel, stored at room temperature (or at − 20 °C where available) and transferred to Parasitology and Mycology laboratory, Aristide Le Dantec University Hospital, Dakar, Senegal. Following the manufacturer’s instruction, DNA was extracted from three 3 mm punches of DBS using the QIAmp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen®, Hilden Germany) and eluted in a 100 µl final volume and stored at − 20 °C until ready for use.

PCR amplification of the 18S rRNA of Plasmodium species and the Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines of human

In order to compare the other two diagnostic tool with PCR as well as molecularly identify the circulating species in the study area, a primary and nested PCR was carried out to differentiate all Plasmodium spp. Both PCR targeted the 18 subunit ribonucleic acid (18S rRNA) for both the genus as well as species using previously described protocol [53]. PCR amplification was carried out with 1 µl extracted DNA and 2 µl of next 1 amplicon for the primary and nested PCR respectively using the Gotaq Green Mater mix (Promega) with detailed constituents outlined in Additional file 1: Table S1. Each sample detected as P. vivax was extracted and re-amplified 3 times in order to reconfirm that they are P. vivax following same protocol as above. Additionally, all P. vivax isolates were re-extracted and -amplified using the High Fidelity fusion Taq (New England Biolab, Inqaba biotec, Pretoria South Africa) to negate any bias likely to be introduced during the amplification process. Clinical isolates of P. falciparum, P. malariae, P. ovale and P. vivax (PCR amplified and confirmed by sequencing) and sterile distilled water were used as the positive and negative controls respectively to validate the nested PCR approach. PCR products in the DNA of a patient’s specimen corresponding to 205 bp (P. falciparum), 144 bp (P. malariae), 800 bp (P. ovale) and 120 bp (P. vivax) were confirmed as positive for the respective species (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Gel documentation of P. vivax species detected in the study area: First well: DNA base pair ladder, well 2: PC-P. vivax positive control, well 3–7: P. vivax samples

With a view to ascertaining the DARC status of the P. vivax infected individuals, isolated DNA from P. vivax infected samples were used, since it also contains human DNA. Using already established primers and protocols [54], a 630 bp PCR fragment covering the promoter region was amplified. This technique has been utilized since it is established that sequencing of this promoter region of the human Duffy gene with regards to the − 33rd nucleotide position can proficiently determine the Duffy status [32, 33, 35, 36, 55]. The appearance of the C-nucleotide in a single peak in the chromatogram at the − 33rd position downstream the promoter region depicts entirely the lack of expression of the Duffy gene on the erythrocytes which is also denoted as the FY*O homozygote genotype, while the detection of both the C and T nucleotide at same position stipulates the heterozygote condition and a single peak with the T-nucleotide indicate the absence of the FY*O genotype [33, 54]. Primer details and PCR conditions are located in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Sequencing of PCR products and multiple sequence alignment

In order to validate the different species identified by PCR in gel electrophoresis, the 18S rRNA gene of P. vivax and the DARC-coding gene of the P. vivax infected individuals were sequenced commercially by Inqaba Biotec, West Africa Ltd, Pretoria (Quote No. NG2018/13544). Request was also made for purification of PCR products prior sequencing. For each fragment, sequencing was carried out from both the 5′ and 3′ directions (2× coverage). Consensus sequences from both the forward and reverse sequences were generated using the BioEdit computer software. Multiple sequence alignment of the 18S rRNA of the vivax isolates and the human Duffy gene was done with BioEdit. Sequences generated from the current study were aligned with their respective reference sequences; P. vivax (SAL-1 accession number U03079.1) and accession number NG_011626.30 for the Duffy gene. All references were retrieved from the NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) by employing the BLAST search.

Statistical analysis

All other data aside the sequences were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 (SPSS, Inc. Chicago IL, USA). Furthermore, the performance of each diagnostic test method was calculated by means of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) using nested PCR as a gold standard. Kappa’s statistics was used to test the level of agreement between the diagnostic tools. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

For ease of cartographic representation of the diversity of mixed species originating from the different study areas, Eti-Osa and Ibeju were grouped as Lagos Island-owing to their location on the part of Lagos state surrounded by the Lagos lagoon and extending into the Atlantic ocean while Oredo and Ikpoba-Okha were grouped as Edo due to their supposed boundary sharing on the western part of Ikpoba-Okha.

Results

From the overall 2376 surveyed study subjects, 436 were included for this study with 39.2% (171/436) of them being from Oredo LGA. The mean age of the study population was 23 years (with a range of 1–85 years). The sex ratio of the overall study population was 0.57 (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of the study population in the six different study sites

 

Eti-Osa

Ibeju

Kosofe

Ikorodu

Oredo

Ikpoba-Okha

Total

Number

44

57

71

82

171

11

436

Percentage (%)

10.09

13.07

16.28

18.81

39.22

2.53

100

Age

 Mean

22

18

25

17

26

33

 

 Range

[4–62]

[2–65]

[2–85]

[1–67]

[1–85]

[10–79]

 

Sex

 Male

28

19

36

38

73

3

197

 Female

16

38

35

44

98

8

239

Number: the figure of subject surveyed in each study sub-location

As described above (Fig. 1), 436 selected samples (300 samples positive by RDT; 135 by microscopy; 165 negative by microscopy, and 136 randomly selected among those negative by RDT) were tested with molecular methods. Of the 300 infections detected as positive by RDT, only 135 were positive by microscopy while the remaining (165) were considered false positives. Similarly, of this same 300 RDT-positive samples further subjected to PCR, only 223 turned out to be positive, while the other 77 were considered false positives by RDT.

Similarly, of the 135 samples detected as positive by microscopy, only 113 were truly positive (60 from Lagos and 53 from Edo) as detected by PCR while the remaining 22 were false positive. Hence, the sensitivity of microscopy was higher (83.7%) than its specificity (52.5%) (Fig. 1; Table 2).
Table 2

Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of microscopy and RDT versus PCR

 

PCR

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Kappa’s test

P value

Positive

Negative

Microscopy

 Positive

113

22

83.7

52.5

44.1

87.8

0.09

0.00

 Negative

143

158

RDT

 Positive

223

77

74.3

74.5

87.1

57.2

0.18

0.00

 Negative

33

103

PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value

However, a reverse pattern was observed in the probability of a positive or negative isolate being correctly identified as such. With RDT, the chances of a positive samples turning out positive by PCR, also known as the positive predictive value (PPV) was very high (87.1%) while the chances of it being picked as truly negative; negative predictive value (NPV) was very low (57.2%). However, the reverse was the case for microscopy, with the NPV being higher (87.8%) than the PPV (44.1%). Assessing the level of agreement using PCR as the gold standard showed that RDT has a weak agreement (Kappa’s statistic = 0.18) with PCR while microscopy shows no agreement (Table 2).

Of the 436 samples collected, the Plasmodium 18S rRNA was amplifiable in 58.7% (256/436), 110 from Edo and 146 from Lagos. Majority of the infections were due to P. falciparum either as single infection 85.5% (219/256; 97 from Edo and 122 from Lagos), or mixed with P. malariae 6.3% (16/256), P. vivax, 1.6% (4/256) or with P. ovale 1.2% (3/256). Plasmodium malariae single infection accounted for about 4.7% (12/256) of the total positive samples. Only one of the five P. vivax isolates was found to be a single infection and only one isolates (0.4%) was found with triple infections of P. falciparum, P. malariae and P. vivax. It is interesting to note that all of the P. vivax sample were from microscopically negative slide detected both in Nigeria and Senegal by a trained and WHO level one microscopist respectively.

With regards to the diversity of Plasmodium species, Edo state has the highest diversity of mixed infection with all species mono infection (except P. ovale) conspicuously represented in addition to mixed P. falciparum/P. malariae, P. falciparum/P. ovale and P. falciparum/P. vivax infection. This is followed by Kosofe and Lagos Island with P. falciparum, P. malariae mono infections as well as P. falciparum/P. malariae mixed infections. The least diversed site by species composition is seen in Ikorodu (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Map of a Africa showing the location of Nigeria with Benin and Cameroon bordering Nigeria to the west and east respectively. b Nigeria pointing to the two states (Lagos and Edo) where study was conducted and c study sites showing the diversity of the Plasmodium species present in each site (grouped site)

In order to authenticate the PCR results with regards to vivax infections, sequencing of the 18S rRNA was carried out on all P. vivax isolates (4 mixed and 1 mono infection). The sequences of the 18S rRNA genes, accompanied by multiple sequence alignment with its reference sequences (U03079.1) showed perfect homology (100% similarity) (Fig. 4). The newly generated sequences of the 18S rRNA genes of all four species will be deposited in the GenBank (MK131265–MK131269).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Multiple sequence alignment of 18S rRNA of Nigerian. Plasmodium vivax isolates with the 18S rRNA of P. vivax SAL-1 strain

The sequences of the Duffy gene were trimmed to 620 bp which is more than sufficient to cover the − 33rd nucleotide position. The − 33C mutation was found in all vivax infecting patients. Diligently, each chromatogram was manually visualized in order to determine if the Duffy genes are homozygote at the − 33rd nucleotide position downstream the promoter region (which will be displayed as a single C peak) or heterozygote with the occurrence of double T and C peak. A single peak of C-nucleotide was found at the − 33rd position of the Duffy gene promoter region in both the forward and reverse direction of the sequences (2× coverage) (Fig. 5), indicating that all P. vivax infected individuals are homozygous Duffy negative, hence there is no expression of the gene on the erythrocytes of the infected individuals. The newly generated sequences of the Duffy promoter region have been submitted to Genbank (MK135816–MK135820).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Sequence alignment of human Duffy gene of P. vivax patients and its accompanying chromatogram with the reference positive strain (NG_011626.3). The T-33C mutation which depicts Duffy negative is shown in the rectangle enclosing the cytosine

Discussion

This study assessed the performance of three diagnostic tools in detecting malaria from six endemic settings with varying levels of transmission in Nigeria. Analysis from this study provides the rate of false positives, false negatives as well as the confirmation of P. vivax in Duffy negative individuals, all of which have implications in malaria control programmes.

Firstly, with regards to the false negative rate, an appreciable number of the sub-microscopy carriers (33/136 randomly selected samples detected as negative both by RDT and microscopy) were not treated as they were wrongly diagnosed as negative both by RDT and microscopy. The failure of RDT to detect these individuals as positive on the one hand, could be due to low levels of target PfHRP2 antigen or even a deletion of it entirely from the isolate [5658] identified as negative. Failure by microscopy on the other hand, could be due to low level of parasitaemia. All of this group of untreated individuals pose a huge challenge to malaria control effort as they subsequently serve as reservoir of infection for continuous transmission [5860]. Even with mass screening, when sensitive technique is not being employed, this group will still go undetected, thus necessitating the use of highly sensitive and specific techniques such as PCR that is capable of detecting very low levels of parasites missed both by RDT and microscopy as has been shown by various studies [4, 18, 32, 58, 61]. Contrary to this study, the sub-microscopic prevalence of P. falciparum of other studies was quite lower than what was obtained here [18, 62], this however, could be due to the experience of the microscopist who read the slides (as the slides were read by a WHO level 1 microscopist), difference in the transmission intensity as well as intervention implementation, which could both (transmission and intervention) influence the burden of parasite carriage in various epidemiological settings.

In the current study, nested PCR targeting the 18S rRNA gene of Plasmodium species was used to detect single and mixed infections. The study reveals the dominance of P. falciparum both as single or mixed infection with P. malariae, P. vivax or P. ovale. This elevated prevalence of P. falciparum among the overall study population as well as in previous studies from Nigeria [1, 2, 43, 63] seems to substantiate the focused attention of malaria control strategies towards this species. Of all the sites surveyed, Oredo and Ikpoba-Okha regrouped as Edo state displayed a high diversity of mixed malaria species with the exception of P. ovale mono infection. Cases of mixed P. falciparum and P. vivax infection have been found to lead to significant severe malaria in Australia as well as in Asia [64, 65]. Additionally, the occurrence of sixteen and three P. malariae and P. ovale mixed (mainly with P. falciparum) infections respectively might have been underestimated by microscopy in this current study. This is because P. ovale infect reticulocytes which happens to be also among the stage parasitized by P. falciparum. This could have resulted in the mis-identification observed in the current findings [66]. The co-infection of P. ovale and P. falciparum in this present study is in agreement with findings from other parts of Nigeria [30, 43] where both species have been found to co-infect individuals. The occurrence of such mixed species should be taken into consideration when planning for malaria control interventions.

Interestingly, the present study report the first molecular evidence of P. vivax from individuals residing in both Lagos and Edo state of Nigeria. Corroborating the PCR outcomes is the result obtained from the sequencing of P. vivax amplicons and subsequent alignment with the SAL-1 reference strain which gave a perfect homology (100% similarity) with its reference strain, suggesting high reliability of molecular techniques as confirmatory diagnostic tool. Before now, the reports of P. vivax connected to Nigeria are those of a traveller [42] as well as microscopically detected P. vivax-like malaria [43, 44]. Wether the P. vivax detected in the traveller who visited Nigeria originated from Nigeria or it was a relapse of P. vivax, since it is known to cause relapse as a result of the dormant hypnozoite stage weeks or even months after treatment [67] is unknown. Although, this is, in our knowledge, the first molecular confirmed incidence of P. vivax in Nigeria, it is however, not surprising as it has been detected elsewhere in SSA where it was thought to be initially absent [24, 28, 35, 37] due to the high prevalence and near fixation of the Duffy-negative gene in Africa which is thought to confer resistant against P. vivax infection [22, 55].

Additionally, the two dominant vector species responsible for malaria transmission in Nigeria-An. gambiae and An. funestus [2] have been implicated in their ability to transmit P. vivax malaria in a study carried out in East Africa [37], it therefore stands to reason that, it is likely that P. vivax can be successfully transmitted from neighbouring African countries especially given the fact that cases of P. vivax have been reported from the Republic of Benin [29] and Cameroon two countries sharing boundaries with Nigeria to the west and east, respectively. Hence, the defensive barrier hypothesis against P. vivax infection due to the near fixation of the Duffy-negative gene in the African population [22] should be looked into.

Interestingly, multiple sequence alignment of the DARC-coding gene of the nine P. vivax infected patients revealed all of them to be homozygous Duffy negative with a single C-nucleotide peak. The present findings taken together with outcomes from similar studies in other Africa countries suggest that P. vivax might be evolving and adapting new strategies in infecting Duffy-negative individuals, just as similar adaptive strategy was observed in the simian malaria parasite-Plasmodium knowlesi now infecting humans [18].

An important limitation of this study is the inability to link P. vivax mono and mixed infection with disease clinical outcomes as studies from Asia in both P. vivax mono and mixed infection (P. vivax/P. falciparum) [64, 65, 68] revealed severe clinical outcomes in both cases. Another limitation is the fact that this survey is restricted to the south-western region, (two out of the 36 states in Nigeria), hence does not give a full representation of the burden of P. vivax in Nigeria. Additionally, though the study was conducted in core areas inhabited by indigenes, the exact travel history of those with P. vivax could not be ascertained, whether they had previously visited a country with circulation of vivax malaria is uncertain. Therefore, there is need for a country-wide survey to ascertain the burden of P. vivax as well as mixed malaria infection in order to put in place adequate control measures.

Conclusion

Given the fact that Nigeria accounts for 27% of the global malaria burden mostly due to P. falciparum [2], the addition of P. vivax to this, will ultimately be a daunting task in the country’s struggle to control malaria. Therefore, the National Malaria Control Programme should initiate a country-wide epidemiological survey of all the circulating species of Plasmodium using very sensitive diagnostic techniques such as PCR and plan control intervention accordingly.

Abbreviations

DNA: 

deoxyribonucleic acid

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

rRNA: 

ribosomal ribonucleic acid

RDT: 

rapid diagnostic test

PvMSP1: 

Plasmodium vivax merozoites surface protein 1

WHO: 

World Health Organization

DARC: 

Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines

RBC: 

red blood cell

WBC: 

white blood cell

LGA: 

local government area

PPV: 

positive predictive value

NPV: 

negative predictive value

IPT: 

intermittent preventive therapy

EDTA: 

ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid

HRP II: 

histidine rich protein II

DBS: 

dried blood spot

SPSS: 

statistical software for social sciences

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MAO and DN designed the study. MAO collected samples from the field. MAO and YDN performed the laboratory experiments. MAO analysed data and made the first draft of the manuscript, received inputs from KD, MAD, ASB and NG. All authors contributed to the revision of the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the willingness of the study participants for their consent in donating blood samples. MAO is grateful to the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) for the partial fund towards her Ph.D. programme. Appreciations are also due to the Rector of the Universite Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Senegal. The authors thank Mrs. Ayanlere and Mr. Agbayewa for their support in sample collection, Mr. Samuel Oladele for the microscopic analysis of smears.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated from this study are enclosed within this published article, its additional information and others deposited in Genbank with accession numbers MK131265–MK131269 and MK135816–MK135820.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB/16/347) Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, the Lagos State Health Service Commission and the Edo State Hospital Management Board. Study objectives, benefits and any perceived risks were explained in English, Yoruba or Esan to all study participants before inclusion. Written and/or verbal informed consent and assent (for children between 8 and 16 years) were obtained.

Funding

This work was supported partially by the Economic Community of West African State (ECOWAS).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Parasitology and Mycology Laboratory, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal
(2)
National Malaria Elimination Programme/Epidemiology Division, Department of Public Health, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria

References

  1. WHO. World Malaria Report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2013/en/. Accessed 3 Sept 2017.
  2. WHO. World Malaria Report 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1071/EC12504. Accessed 3 Mar 2018.
  3. Federal Ministry of Health. National guideline for diagnosis and treatment of malaria, 3rd edn; 2015. Accessed 22 Dec 2016.Google Scholar
  4. Mahende C, Ngasala B, Lusingu J, Yong TS, Lushino P, Lemnge M, et al. Performance of rapid diagnostic test, blood-film microscopy and PCR for the diagnosis of malaria infection among febrile children from Korogwe District, Tanzania. Malar J. 2016;15:391.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Abeku TA, Kristan M, Jones C, Beard J, Mueller DH, Okia M, et al. Determinants of the accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests in malaria case management: evidence from low and moderate transmission settings in the East African highlands. Malar J. 2008;7:202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Alves FP, Durlacher RR, Menezes MJ, Krieger H, Pereira da Silva LH, Camargo EP. High prevalence of asymptomatic Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum infections in native Amazonian populations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66:641–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Bisoffi Z, Sirima SB, Menten J, Pattaro C, Angheben A, Gobbi F, et al. Accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test on the diagnosis of malaria infection and of malaria-attributable fever during low and high transmission season in Burkina Faso. Malar J. 2010;9:192.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Endeshaw T, Gebre T, Ngondi J, Graves PM, Shargie EB, Ejigsemahu Y, et al. Evaluation of light microscopy and rapid diagnostic test for the detection of malaria under operational field conditions: a household survey in Ethiopia. Malar J. 2008;7:118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Moody AH, Chiodini PL, Work GH. Methods for the detection of blood parasites. Clin Lab Haem. 2000;22:189–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Federal Ministry of Health. National Malaria Indicator Survey. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004. Accessed 25 Oct 2016.
  11. Lau YL, Lai MY, Anthony CN, Chang PY, Palaeya V, Fong MY, et al. Comparison of three molecular methods for the detection and speciation of five human Plasmodium species. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:28–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Masashi M, Tanigawa C, Fujii Y, Kaneko S. Comparison of six commercially-available dna polymerases for direct PCR. Rev Inst Med Trop de São Paulo. 2013;55:401–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Mixson-Hayden T, Lucchi NW, Udhayakumar V. Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehtesham R, Fazaeli A, Raeisi A, Keshavarz H, Heidari A. Detection of mixed-species infections of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax by nested PCR and rapid diagnostic tests in southeastern Iran. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:181–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Nwuzo AC, Ogbu O, Iroha IR, Okonkwo EC, Okoh NF, Alo MN. Genotypic speciation of four Plasmodium among human immunodeficiency virus positive individuals attending HIV clinics in Abakaliki, South-Eastern. Cell Dev Biol. 2015;4:e1000153.Google Scholar
  16. Mekonnen SK, Aseffa A, Medhin G, Berhe N, Velavan TP. Re-evaluation of microscopy confirmed Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria by nested PCR detection in southern Ethiopia. Malar J. 2014;13:48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. May J, Mockenhaupt FP, Ademowo OG, Falusi AG, Olumese PE, Bienzle U, et al. High rate of mixed and subpatent malarial infections in southwest Nigeria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:339–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. White NJ. Plasmodium knowlesi: the fifth human malaria parasite. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:172–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Baird JK. Resistance to therapies for infection by Plasmodium vivax. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:508–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Guerra CA, Snow RW, Hay SI. Mapping the global extent of malaria in 2005. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22:353–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Price RN, Tjitra E, Guerra CA, Yeung S, White NJ, Anstey NM, et al. Vivax malaria: neglected and not benign. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77(Suppl. 6):79–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller LH, Mason SJ, Clyde DF, McGinnis MH. The resistance factor to Plasmodium vivax in blacks. The Duffy-blood-group genotype, FyFy. N Engl J Med. 1976;295:302–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gruszczyk J, Kanjee U, Chan LJ, Menant S, Malleret B, Lim NTY, et al. Transferrin receptor 1 is a reticulocyte-specific receptor for Plasmodium vivax. Science. 2018;359:48–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ménard D, Barnadas C, Bouchier C, Henry-halldin C, Gray LR. Plasmodium vivax clinical malaria is commonly observed in Duffy-negative Malagasy people. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:5967–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zimmerman AP, Ferreira UM, Howes ER, Mercereau-Puijalon PO. Red blood cell polymorphism and susceptibility to Plasmodium vivax. Adv Parasitol. 2013;81:27–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Isaac IZ, John RT, Udomah FP, Imoru M, Erhabor O, Femi A. Duffy blood group distribution among patients in a malaria endemic region. Int J Trop Dis Health. 2016;19:1–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Russo G, Faggioni G, Paganotti GM, Djeunang Dongho GB, Pomponi A, De Santis R, et al. Molecular evidence of Plasmodium vivax infection in Duffy negative symptomatic individuals from Dschang, West Cameroon. Malar J. 2017;16:74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ba H, Duffy CW, Ahouidi AD, Deh YB, Diallo MY, Tandia A, et al. Widespread distribution of Plasmodium vivax malaria in Mauritania on the interface of the Maghreb and West Africa. Malar J. 2016;15:80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Poirier P, Lang CD, Atchade PS, Lemoine JP, Louise M, De C, et al. The hide and seek of Plasmodium vivax in West Africa: report from a large-scale study in Beninese asymptomatic subjects. Malar J. 2016;15:570.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Niang M, Diop F, Niang O, Sadio BD, Sow A, Faye O, et al. Unexpected high circulation of Plasmodium vivax in asymptomatic children from Kédougou, southeastern Senegal. Malar J. 2017;16:497.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Niang M, Thiam LG, Sow A, Loucoubar C, Bob NS, Diop F, et al. A molecular survey of acute febrile illnesses reveals Plasmodium vivax infections in Kedougou, southeastern Senegal. Malar J. 2015;14:281.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Fru-Cho J, Bumah VV, Safeukui I, Nkuo-Akenji T, Titanji VPK, Haldar K. Molecular typing reveals substantial Plasmodium vivax infection in asymptomatic adults in a rural area of Cameroon. Malar J. 2014;13:170.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Mbenda HGN, Das A. Molecular evidence of Plasmodium vivax mono and mixed malaria parasite infections in Duffy-negative native cameroonians. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e0103262.Google Scholar
  34. Bernabeu M, Gomez-Perez GP, Sissoko S, Niambélé MB, Haibala AA, Sanz A, et al. Plasmodium vivax malaria in Mali: a study from three different regions. Malar J. 2012;11:405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Mendes C, Dias F, Figueiredo J, Mora VG, Cano J, de Sousa B, et al. Duffy negative antigen is no longer a barrier to Plasmodium vivax—molecular evidences from the African West Coast (Angola and Equatorial Guinea). PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e0001192.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Wurtz N, Mint Lekweiry K, Bogreau H, Pradines B, Rogier C, et al. Vivax malaria in Mauritania includes infection of a Duffy-negative individual. Malar J. 2011;10:336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryan JR, Stoute JA, Amon J, Dunton RF, Mtalib R, Koros J, et al. Evidence for transmission of Plasmodium vivax among a Duffy antigen negative population in Western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:575–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Culleton R, Carter R. African Plasmodium vivax: distribution and origins. Int J Parasitol. 2012;42:1091–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Loy DE, Plenderleith LJ, Sundararaman SA, Liu W, Gruszczyk J, Chen YJ, et al. Evolutionary history of human Plasmodium vivax revealed by genome-wide analyses of related ape parasites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E8450–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenberg R. Plasmodium vivax in Africa: hidden in plain sight? Trends Parasitol. 2007;23:193–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Erhabor O, Shehu CE, Alhaji YB, Yakubu A. Duffy red cell phenotypes among pregnant women in Sokoto, North Western Nigeria. J Blood Disord Transfus. 2014;5:7–11.Google Scholar
  42. Graffeo R, Masucci L, Bugli F, Damiano F, Pinnetti C, Federico G, et al. Multiple malaria infection in a pregnant woman from Nigeria: detection by multiplex PCR. New Microbiol. 2008;31:565–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Babamale OA, Ugbomoiko U. Status of malaria infection in peri-urban community of North Central Region of Nigeria. J Bacteriol Parasitol. 2016;7:256.Google Scholar
  44. Erhabor O, Babatunde S, Uko K. Some haematological parameters in plasmodial parasitized HIV-infected Nigerians. Niger J Med. 2006;15:52–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Odugbemi BA, Wright KO, Onajole AT, Kuyinu YA, Goodman OO, Odugbemi TO, et al. A malariometric survey of under—fives residing in indoor residual spraying-implementing and non-implementing communities of Lagos, Nigeria. Malar J. 2016;15:458.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Ebomwonyi A, Omoregie AO, Noutcha MAE. Trend in malaria incidence rates (2006–2013) in Edo State, Nigeria. Int J Trop Dis Health. 2015;7:40–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Enato EFO, Okhamafe AO, Okpere EE. A survey of knowledge, attitude and practice of malaria management among pregnant women from two health care facilities in Nigeria. Acta Obs Gynecol. 2007;86:33–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Owolabi AA. Increasing population, urbanization and climatic factors in Lagos State, Nigeria: the nexus and implications on water demand and supply. J Glob Initiatives. 2016;11:69–77.Google Scholar
  49. Aigbodion FI, Uyi OO. Temporal distribution of and habitat diversification by some mosquito species in Benin city, Nigeria. J Entomol. 2013;10:13–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Okwa O, Rasheed A, Adeyemi A, Omoyeni M, Oni L, Fayemi A, et al. Anopheles species abundances, composition and vectoral competence in six areas of Lagos: Nigeria. J Cell Anim Biol. 2007;1:19–23.Google Scholar
  51. Mckenzie FE, Prudhomme WA, Magill AJ, Forney JR, Permpanich B, Lucas C, et al. White blood cell counts and malaria. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:323–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Snounou PG, Singh B. Nested PCR analysis of Plasmodium parasites. Methods Mol Med. 2002;72:189–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Chittoria A, Mohanty S, Jaiswal YK, Das A. Natural selection mediated association of the Duffy (FY) gene polymorphisms with Plasmodium vivax malaria in India. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e45219.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Hamblin MT, Thompson EE, Di Rienzo A. Complex signatures of natural selection at the Duffy blood group locus. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:369–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Cheng Q, Gatton ML, Barnwell J, Chiodini P, McCarthy J, Bell D, et al. Plasmodium falciparum parasites lacking histidine-rich protein 2 and 3: a review and recommendations for accurate reporting. Malar J. 2014;13:283.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Koita OA, Doumbo OK, Ouattara A, Tall LK, Konaré A, Diakité M, et al. False-negative rapid diagnostic tests for malaria and deletion of the histidine-rich repeat region of the HRP2 gene. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:194–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Kumar N, Pande V, Bhatt RM, Shah NK, Mishra N, Srivastava B, et al. Genetic deletion of HRP2 and HRP3 in Indian Plasmodium falciparum population and false negative malaria rapid diagnostic test. Acta Trop. 2013;125:119–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Starzengruber P, Fuehrer H, Ley B, Thriemer K, Swoboda P, Habler VE, et al. High prevalence of asymptomatic malaria in south-eastern Bangladesh. Malar J. 2014;13:16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Ouédraogo AL, Bousema T, Schneider P, de Vlas SJ, Ilboudo-Sanogo E, Cuzin-Ouattara N, et al. Substantial contribution of submicroscopical Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriage to the infectious reservoir in an area of seasonal transmission. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Babiker HA, Schneider P, Reece SE. Gametocytes: insights gained during a decade of molecular monitoring. Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:525–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Doctor MD, Liu Y, Whitesell A, Thwai KL, Taylor SM, Janko M, et al. Malaria surveillance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: comparison of microscopy, PCR, and rapid diagnostic test. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85:16–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Golassa L, Enweji N, Erko B, Aseffa A, Swedberg G. Detection of a substantial number of sub-microscopic Plasmodium falciparum infections by polymerase chain reaction: a potential threat to malaria control and diagnosis in Ethiopia. Malar J. 2013;12:352.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Igbeneghu C, Igbeneghu C, Odaibo AB. Plasmodium species among the inhabitants of iwo community, southwestern Nigeria. Am Eurasian J Sci Res. 2012;7:118–22.Google Scholar
  64. Kochar DK, Das A, Kochar A, Middha S, Acharya J, Tanwar GS, et al. A prospective study on adult patients of severe malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax and mixed infection from Bikaner, northwest India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2014;51:200–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Genton B, D’Acremont V, Rare L, Baea K, Reeder JC, Alpers MP, et al. Plasmodium vivax and mixed infections are associated with severe malaria in children: a prospective cohort study from Papua New Guinea. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e127.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Collins WE, Jeffery GM. Plasmodium ovale: parasite and disease. Clinical Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:570–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. White NJ, Imwong M. Relapse. Adv Parasitol. 2012;80:113–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Barcus MJ, Basri H, Picarima H, Manyakori C, Sekartuti Elyazar I, et al. Demographic risk factors for severe and fatal vivax and falciparum malaria among hospital admissions in northeastern Indonesian Papua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:984–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement