Skip to main content
Download PDF

Malaria-associated risk factors among adolescents living in areas with persistent transmission in Senegal: a case–control study

Malaria Journal volume 21, Article number: 193 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In Senegal, malaria morbidity has sharply decreased over these past years. However, malaria epidemiology remains heterogeneous with persistent transmission in the southeastern part of the country and many cases among older children and adolescents. Little is known about factors associated with clinical malaria among this group. A better understanding of malaria transmission among this newly emerging vulnerable group will guide future interventions targeting this population group. This study aimed to identify factors associated with clinical malaria among adolescents in Senegal.

Methods

A case–control study was conducted from November to December 2020 in four health posts located in the Saraya district. Cases were defined as adolescents (10–19 years) with an uncomplicated malaria episode with fever (temperature > 37.5°) or a history of fever and positive malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT). Controls were from the same age group, living in the neighbourhood of the case, presenting a negative RDT. A standardized, pre-tested questionnaire was administered to each study participant followed by a home visit to assess the participant's living conditions. Factors associated with clinical malaria were assessed using stepwise logistic regression analysis.

Results

In total, 492 individuals were recruited (246 cases and 246 controls). In a multivariate analysis, factors associated with clinical malaria included non-use of long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) (aOR = 2.65; 95% CI 1.58–4.45), non-use of other preventive measures (aOR = 2.51; 95% CI 1.53–4.11) and indoor sleeping (aOR = 3.22; 95% CI 1.66–6.23). Protective factors included 15–19 years of age (aOR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.23–0.62), absence of stagnant water around the house (aOR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.16–0.44), having a female as head of household (aOR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.25–0.90), occupation such as apprentice (OR = 0.24; 95% CI 0.11–0.52).

Conclusions

The study revealed that environmental factors and non-use of malaria preventive measures are the main determinants of malaria transmission among adolescents living in areas with persistent malaria transmission in Senegal. Strategies aimed at improving disease awareness and access to healthcare interventions, such as LLINs, are needed to improve malaria control and prevention among these vulnerable groups.

Background

Malaria remains a major public health problem globally and particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, despite the substantial decrease of malaria burden over these past 15 years, due to the scale-up of standard control interventions such as prompt diagnosis and treatment, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), and indoor residual spraying (IRS) [1]. In 2020, 241 million malaria cases were reported in 85 endemic countries, with an estimate of 228 million cases representing 95% of cases, in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In addition, 627,000 deaths were attributed to malaria globally in 2020, among which, 602,000 occurred in SSA [2].

In Senegal, malaria is endemic and unevenly distributed in the 14 regions of the country. In 2019, by the time of the current study initiation, the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) reported 354,708 malaria cases representing an incidence of 21.9 per 1000. Most of these cases (81%) were reported in three regions located in the southeastern part of the country: Kolda, Tambacounda and Kédougou [3]. Current malaria policies in Senegal are mainly focused on achieving universal coverage of effective interventions, including malaria diagnosis, predominantly through rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs); treatment of all malaria cases with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT); intermittent preventive treatment for pregnant women (IPTp); LLINs; and/or IRS [4, 5]. Seasonal malaria chemoprevention and reactive case detection have recently been introduced in specific geographic areas in Senegal [6, 7]. Senegal adopted a strategy of universal coverage of LLINs in 2010. Since then, LLINs have been rolled out through mass campaigns every 3 years, in parallel with a routine distribution system at health facility level, targeting mainly pregnant women during antenatal care visits, and children under 5 years old. From 2013 to 2017, proportional morbidity and mortality nationwide decreased from 5.4 to 3.3% and from 7.5 to 1.7%, respectively. However, these indicators increased from 2017 to 2018, with proportional morbidity increasing from 3.3 to 4.8% and proportional mortality from 1.7 to 3.5% [8]. From 2018 to 2019, these indicators have decreased again, proportional morbidity dropping from 4.8 to 3.0% and mortality from 3.5 to 1.7% [3]. In addition, longitudinal routine malaria data from the NMCP showed that over the past 5 years, the majority of malaria cases occurred among 10–15 years-old adolescents (Tine R, pers. comm.).

A study conducted in Dielmo in the central part of Senegal, to assess the evolution of malaria morbidity in adults before and after the implementation of LLINs, showed that 15–19 years-old adolescents were the most vulnerable group during malaria upsurges [9]. Recent studies conducted in SSA countries have shown a higher prevalence of malaria among older children and adolescents [10,11,12], or an increased risk of malaria among these groups [13,14,15,16]. This could be explained by several reasons including the lack of optimal usage of LLINs [17, 18] and sub-optimal behaviour such as staying outdoors during the night, which corresponds to the time of malaria vector activity [18, 19]. Despite these trends, children under 5 years of age and pregnant women are still considered the most at-risk groups for malaria in Senegal and consequently represent the usual target of the majority of available control measures such as IPTp and routine distribution of LLINs. This may lead to a residual human malaria reservoir with adolescents and older children who are not the primary target of control measures. There is thus an urgent need to adapt current malaria control strategies to account for emerging of additional vulnerable groups such as older children and adolescents. A better understanding of malaria-associated risk factors and their determinants among older children and adolescents is needed to optimize malaria control among these specific key populations. But there is a lack of evidence about factors associated with clinical malaria among this age group. Studies are needed to fill these scientific gaps that may hamper malaria control and elimination efforts.

This case–control study was conducted to assess factors associated with clinical malaria among adolescents to inform future control strategies among key vulnerable populations living in areas with persistent malaria transmission in Senegal.

Methods

Study setting

The study was conducted in the health district of Saraya, located in the Kedougou region in the southeastern part of Senegal, 800 km from Dakar, the capital. The district shares a border with Mali at the east, Guinea in the south, the region of Tambacounda in the north, and the health district of Kedougou in the west. The health district occupies a land area of 6837 sq km. The population is composed of the rural communities of Bembou, Medina Baffe, Sabadola, Khossanto, and Missirah Sirimana. The district has one health centre, 22 health posts, 28 health huts, and 78 villages each with a village volunteer for malaria case management (Dispensateur de soins à domicile (DSDOM)). The climate is Sudano-Guinean with a dry season and a rainy season. Malaria is meso-endemic and stable in Saraya, with a long transmission season lasting four to six months from July to December. Transmission intensity remains high with 20 to 100 infectious bites/person/year and high morbidity during the transmission period. The major vectors are Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis sensu lato (s.l.), Anopheles funestus, and Anopheles nili [20]. Malaria incidence was 376.6 per 1000 in 2017, 487.2 per 1000 in 2018, 379.8 per 1000 in 2019 [3], and 607.4 per 1000 in 2020 [5].

Study design and participants

A case–control study was conducted from November to December 2020 in four health posts (Bembou, Diakhaling, Khossanto, Sambrambougou), selected purposively based on reported malaria morbidity in 2019 and community accessibility during the rainy season. The number of confirmed malaria cases in 2019 was 1404 in Bembou, 1485 in Diakhaling, 2166 in Khossanto, and 3311 in Sambrambougou.

Cases were recruited from participating health posts while the controls were recruited within the same community, in the same village as the case but not in the same house (case and control houses were distant from each other by at least two other houses). A case was defined as an adolescent (10–19 years old) coming to seek care at one of the participating health posts for uncomplicated malaria episode defined as fever (temperature > 37.5°) or history of fever within the previous 48 h, with positive malaria RDT according to the NMCP guidelines. Control was a person of the same age group, living in the neighbourhood of the case, with negative RDT.

Non-inclusion criteria for both, the cases and the controls included: (i) children under 10 years old; (ii) individual who does not live in the study area; (iii) subject who received anti-malarial treatment 3 weeks before the study.

Data collection methods

An electronic data collection platform was used. Data were collected using android tablets with the electronic questionnaire developed on REDCap, which is a Research Electronic Data Capture software compatible with android technology [21, 22]. Data collected from the tablets were then synced via an internet connection to a server hosted at University Cheikh Anta Diop in Dakar for storage. Data were extracted from the server for cleaning and analysis. Before the start of the study, nurses and community health workers in participating health posts were trained on the study procedures, including informed consent and administration of the questionnaire. For each participant who gave informed consent, an electronic standardized questionnaire was administered to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics of the participant and those of the household head, the household assets (water source, type of toilet, ownership of certain items such as television, radio, fridge, etc.), ownership and use of LLIN, use of other malaria control measures, individual behaviour during the mosquito ‘biting time’ (stay outdoors at evening/night, sleeping outdoors during the night). Home visits were performed for both cases and controls to assess the living conditions of the participants (types of wall, floor, roof), as well as the environmental factors such as stagnant water within and in the vicinity of the household, overgrown vegetation/bushes inside and in the vicinity of the houses of the participants.

Statistical methods

Sample size calculation

For the sample size calculation, the use of LLINs was considered the main determinant associated with malaria. The proportion of LLIN use among children in the study area is 62% [23]; assuming a risk alpha at 5%, with a ratio of 1 control for 1 case, the study was powered at 80% to detect an odds ratio of 0.6 if 492 individuals were recruited (246 cases vs 246 controls).

Data analysis

Data were extracted from the server and analysed using STATA software [24]. A composite variable of wealth index was estimated, based on the assets of the households [25]. Housing variables are not included in the wealth index calculation as in the index used in the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) [23] to avoid correlation between variables. Impact of housing materials on malaria risk as shown in other studies are assessed separately [25, 26]. The index was then categorized into five wealth quintiles (richest, rich, middle, poor, poorest) using the Principal Component Analysis method (PCA) [23, 27]. Variables characterizing household materials, including the type of wall, roof and floor were grouped according to the DHS definition [23] as traditional (rudimentary and natural) and modern to create a binary housing variable. Modern houses were then defined as those that have a modern wall, modern roof and modern floor; while traditional houses were those that have a rudimentary and natural wall, floor and roof [25]. Modern roof materials include cement/concrete, wood planks, tile, metal, while traditional roof materials include thatch/straw, bamboo. Modern floor materials include cement and ceramic tiles whereas traditional floor materials include earth/mud and bamboo. Modern wall materials consisted of cement and wood/planks while traditional wall materials consisted of earth/mud and bamboo/palm.

The percentage was used to assess the frequency of each outcome with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Characteristics of all participants included in the study were tabulated. Proportions were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test where appropriate (univariate analysis).

Factors associated with malaria were assessed using a logistic regression model. Covariates with a p-value < 0.20 in univariate analysis were introduced in the multivariate model. From the final model, adjusted odds ratios were derived with their 95% CI. Model validity was tested using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit test. The performance of the final model was assessed by the area under the curve, and Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. In addition, a test for multicollinearity between variables was done using the variance inflation factor. The significance level of the different tests was 0.05, two-sided.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was approved by the University Cheikh Anta Diop Institutional Review Board (CER/UCAD/AD/MSN /039/2020). Before the start of the study, administrative authorization was sought from the regional and district medical authorities in Kedougou and Saraya. In the field, participation in the study was strictly voluntary. Before any enrolment, written informed consent was obtained from parents or caregivers for adolescents under 18 years old, while 18–19 years-old individuals were invited to consent themselves. In addition, a child assent was sought from 15 to 17 years-old participants. A unique identification code was attributed to each participant. Personal identified data collected for the household head were de-identified before the data extraction. All analyses were performed using participant's identification code to ensure maximum confidentiality. Access to the study data was restricted and information collected was only used for the study purpose.

Results

Participants’ characteristics at enrolment

Demographics

A total of 492 individuals were recruited (246 cases and 246 controls). Cases and controls were similar in terms of demographic characteristics. There was no statistical difference between cases and controls (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants and the household heads
Full size table

Participants’ living conditions, LLIN ownership and usage

Most of the cases (81.71%) and the controls (93.09%) reported LLIN ownership but LLIN ownership was significantly higher among controls (p = 0.0003). The proportion of cases that reported the use of LLIN was 63.82% while that among controls was 82.52% (p = 0.0001). LLIN usage the previous night was significantly higher among controls (78.46%) compared to cases (58.94%) (p = 0.0001). Almost all the controls (92.68%) reported sleeping outdoors sometimes, compared to the cases (72.76%) (p < 10–3). Stagnant water in the vicinity of the household was observed for 46.75% of the cases and 22.76% of the controls (p = 0.0025). The type of floor of the house was traditional for 80.49% of the control compared to 58.13% for the cases (p < 10–3) (Table 2).

Table 2 Distribution of the study population according to the preventive measures and housing conditions
Full size table

Factors associated with malaria among the study participants

In the multivariate analysis, in overall, factors associated with clinical malaria included non-use of LLIN (aOR = 2.65; 95% CI 1.58–4.45), non-use of other preventive measures (aOR = 2.51; 95% CI 1.53–4.11) and indoor sleeping (aOR = 3.22; 95%CI 1.66–6.23). Protective factors included age range between 15–19 years (aOR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.23–0.62), absence of stagnant water around the house (aOR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.16–0.44), having a female as head of household (aOR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.25–0.90), occupation such as apprentice (OR = 0.24; 95%CI = 0.11–0.52) (Table 3).

Table 3 Factors associated with clinical malaria in the study participants
Full size table

When stratified by age groups, factors associated with malaria among 10–14 years old children include non-use of LLIN (aOR = 3.36; 95% CI 1.24–9.15), non-use of other preventive measures (aOR = 3.32; 95% CI 1.61–6.85), indoor sleeping (aOR = 4.21; 95% CI 1.30–13.66). Protective factors included occupation such as apprentice (aOR = 0.07; 95% CI 0.020.30) and other occupation including children in placement in koranic school (“talibe”) and seller (aOR = 0.13; 95% CI 0.03–0.59); absence of stagnant water around the house (aOR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.11–0.59) and absence of stagnant water inside the house (aOR = 0.14; 95% CI 0.02–0.97) (Table 4).

Table 4 Factors associated with malaria among 10–14 years old adolescents
Full size table

Factors associated with malaria among 15–19 years-old adolescents include non-use of LLINs (aOR = 2.20; 95% CI 1.22–3.98), indoor sleeping (aOR = 3.79; 95% CI 1.64–8.77). Protective factors included having a female as head of household (aOR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04–0.60) and absence of stagnant water around the house (aOR 0.46; 95% CI 0.26–0.86) (Table 5).

Table 5 Factors associated with malaria among 15–19 years-old adolescents
Full size table

Other factors, including gender of adolescents, age and level of education of the household head, wealth index, and type of house were not significantly associated with clinical malaria among study participants.

Discussion

Malaria is an important public health problem in Senegal, with a shift of the disease burden from younger to older children and adolescents. The present study aimed at identifying factors associated with clinical malaria among adolescents aged 10–19 years, living in areas with persistent malaria transmission, to guide future interventions.

The results showed that adolescents who reported not sleeping under a LLIN are more at risk of malaria compared to those who reported LLIN usage. This result is consistent with the findings from other studies [16, 18, 28]. In Senegal as in most countries, health systems and services are mainly designed for either young children or adults [29] and, therefore, not adapted to the specific needs of adolescents. For instance, the routine distribution of LLINs at the health facilities and community levels is mainly targeting pregnant women and children under 5 years old. This situation may hinder their access to health services and information, and justifies the need for implementing adolescent-friendly integrated programmes [29, 30]. Such strategies will help to overcome adolescent health-related issues, including access to and utilization of malaria services. The NMCP could explore alternative ways of increasing the target to adolescents. This could improve coverage and utilization of preventive measures among this specific population. Other factors including belief, stigma and adolescent knowledge could also restrict their access to and use of health care services [27, 31,32,33]. This problem calls for the need to increase adolescent awareness with regard to malaria control and prevention. This could be achieved through school-based delivery of a package of interventions targeting both conventional and traditional schools such as the koranic schools (‘Dara’ in Senegal). It is well established that school-based health education is an effective means of sustaining health knowledge and passing this knowledge to communities [34,35,36]. Other places/organizations that adolescents may attend such as vocational training centres, community-based networks/organizations and youth movements/associations could also be targeted to reach out-of-school adolescents [37]. The empowerment of adolescents through a community-based peer education approach could also be an alternative to improving their awareness and knowledge of malaria prevention and promoting LLIN use among their peers. Peer education has been shown to be an effective tool for health promotion and influences positive behaviour [38,39,40]. It could be an additional strategy to consider by the Senegalese NMCP to reach specific groups such as adolescents.

Non-use of other preventive measures was associated with an increased risk of malaria, specifically among 10–14 years-old adolescents. In this study, other control measures included aerosol spraying, mosquito coils, weeding, IRS, sewage evacuation, and traditional methods. Most of the study participants reported the use of aerosol spraying, and the frequency of aerosol usage was higher among controls. Other studies have shown that the use of mosquito control measures, including aerosol sprays, herbs and mosquito coils is associated with a lower risk of clinical malaria [41, 42]. However, a Cochrane systematic review has not shown evidence of an association between spatial repellents such as mosquito coils and the risk of malaria [43].

Several studies have reported an association between higher risk of malaria and outdoor sleeping [1, 44]. In contrast to these findings, in this study adolescents who reported not sleeping outdoors (e.g., indoor sleeping) have a 4.74-fold higher risk of clinical malaria compared to those that reported sleeping outdoors. This result is in line with findings from a study conducted in Myanmar among migrants in gold mining, rubber and palm oil plantation areas [45]. Mosquito behaviour in this study area could explain this result. Entomological surveillance data showed that An. gambiae s.l. is the most predominant vector in this area, with a significantly higher indoor biting (endophagic) rate [46]. Although it is proven that LLIN is effective on endophagic vectors [47], participants might be bitten indoors when they are awake, before the use of LLINs during sleeping time. To ensure maximum protective effect against malaria, high-quality LLINs are required [48]. The increased risk of clinical malaria among children who reported indoor sleeping as the main behaviour could also be due to poor LLIN quality, but the study did not assess LLIN quality across the different households.

Adolescents aged 10–14 years old were at higher risk of malaria compared to their counterparts of 15–19 years old. In the study area, as in other southern regions in Senegal where malaria is highly seasonal and transmission important, 3 months to 10 years-old children were receiving seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine (SPAQ) for three to four months during the transmission season. SMC policy has been implemented in these locations since 2013 with an average coverage of full treatment courses around 80% per year [3, 5]. Thus, younger children enrolled in this study had received several rounds of SMC. Although SMC has been proven to be efficacious in reducing malaria morbidity and mortality [7, 49, 50], the strategy has the potential to induce a reduction in the malaria antibodies [51, 52]. Therefore, the increased risk of clinical malaria among 10–14 years-old children could be related to an increased susceptibility due to reduced antibody levels after several rounds of SMC. Moreover, though the SMC programme has overall strongly positive health effects, a shift of morbidity in older children can be induced by the programme if transmission levels remain static and not reduced by other interventions [53]. As the malaria burden is shifting in these areas with older children becoming more at risk, increasing SMC target up to 15 years should be evaluated as an alternative option for controlling malaria in areas with persistent malaria transmission.

The absence of stagnant water in the vicinity of the house was protective against malaria in the study participants. This finding is in line with those of other studies [19, 44, 54, 55]. This could be explained by the fact that stagnant waters are potential breeding sites of Anopheles mosquitoes. Therefore, having such water around the house could increase the population of mosquitoes and facilitate malaria transmission [56].

Compared to those that have males as household heads, participants who have female household heads were protected against malaria in the study and this result is specific to older adolescents, aged 15–19 years. Similar to these findings, a study conducted in India reported that households with male heads have a greater risk of malaria [57]. It is well established that in many African contexts, women usually play a primary role of care-giving to other members of the household [58], and are more committed to promoting disease prevention strategies, such as LLIN usage within their own families, as shown in a study conducted in Nampula Province, in Mozambique [59]. In addition, women are often responsible for hanging, washing and making nets usable [59].

This study also showed reduced risk of clinical malaria among apprentice and talibé (children in placement in Koranic school) compared to children attending classic school, particularly among 10–14 years-old children. In this study, most of the apprentices were controls and reported high LLIN use, which may explain their reduced risk of getting malaria. In this study, apprentice includes tailor, driver, mechanic, mason, and is not an occupation associated with high risk of malaria such as gold mining or farming, as shown in other studies [16, 57, 60]. Being talibé is also associated with a reduced risk of malaria. This result is surprising since these children are considered a vulnerable population and are at higher risk of infectious diseases such as malaria [61]. Most of the talibé were controls and reported use of LLINs; this could explain this result. Serological studies assessing cumulative exposure to malaria parasites would provide more insights on malaria distribution among the group of talibé.

Limitation of the study

The main limitation of this study is the lack of entomological surveys to assess mosquito vectors and their biting behaviour as well as transmission intensity in the study area. However, an entomological survey conducted in 2019 provided additional information and showed that malaria vector species were predominantly represented by An. gambiae s.l. with an important fraction of indoor biting population [46].

In this study, the identification of cases and controls relied on RDT results. While this method is not the gold standard for malaria diagnostic, RDT results are used to define malaria episodes, according to national guidelines and in many healthcare settings, treatment practices as well as the routine surveillance system.

Conclusion

The study revealed that environmental factors and the non-use of preventive measures are the main determinants of malaria risk among adolescents living in areas with a persistent transmission in Senegal. Strategies aiming to increase disease awareness and access to healthcare interventions, such as LLINs, are needed to improve malaria control and prevention among these vulnerable groups. This could be achieved through adolescent-friendly health programmes. In addition, extending the target of LLINs routine distribution to adolescents and increasing the SMC target to 15 years of age might be an alternative option for accelerating malaria control in these areas with persistent malaria transmission.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used for the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

NMCP:

National Malaria Control Programme

RDT:

Rapid diagnostic test

aOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

SSA:

Sub-Saharan Africa

LLIN:

Long-lasting insecticide net

REDCap:

Research Electronic Data Capture

DHS:

Demographic and Health Survey

AIC:

Akaike Information Criterion

BIC:

Bayesian Information Criterion

AUC:

Area under curve

SMC:

Seasonal malaria chemoprevention

SPAQ:

Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine

IRS:

Indoor residual spraying

ACT:

Artemisinin-based combination therapy

IPTp:

Intermittent preventive treatment for pregnant women

DSDOM:

Dispensateur de soins à domicile

PCA:

Principal component analysis

References

  1. Mwesigwa J, Achan J, Di Tanna GL, Affara M, Jawara M, Worwui A, et al. Residual malaria transmission dynamics varies across The Gambia despite high coverage of control interventions. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0187059.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. World malaria report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/350147. Accessed 20 Jan 2022.

  3. Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP). Bulletin épidémiologique annuel 2019 du paludisme au Sénégal. 2020.

  4. Thwing J, Eckert E, Dione DA, Tine R, Faye A, Yé Y, et al. Declines in Malaria burden and all-cause child mortality following increases in control interventions in Senegal, 2005–2010. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97:89–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP). Bulletin Epdidemiologique annuel 2020 du paludisme au Sénégal. 2021.

  6. Tine RCK, Ndour CT, Faye B, Cairns M, Sylla K, Ndiaye M, et al. Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of combining home based malaria management and seasonal malaria chemoprevention in children less than 10 years in Senegal: a cluster-randomised trial. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2014;108:13–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cissé B, Ba EH, Sokhna C, Ndiaye JL, Gomis JF, Dial Y, et al. Effectiveness of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in children under ten years of age in Senegal: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (PNLP). Bulletin épidémiologique annuel 2018 du paludisme au Sénégal. 2019.

  9. Wotodjo AN, Doucoure S, Diagne N, Sarr FD, Parola P, Gaudart J, et al. Another challenge in malaria elimination efforts: the increase of malaria among adults after the implementation of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) in Dielmo, Senegal. Malar J. 2018;17:384.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishengoma DS, Mmbando BP, Segeja MD, Alifrangis M, Lemnge MM, Bygbjerg IC. Declining burden of malaria over two decades in a rural community of Muheza district, north-eastern Tanzania. Malar J. 2013;12:338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Walldorf JA, Cohee LM, Coalson JE, Bauleni A, Nkanaunena K, Kapito-Tembo A, et al. School-age children are a reservoir of malaria infection in Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0134061.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deutsch-Feldman M, Parr JB, Keeler C, Brazeau NF, Goel V, Emch M, et al. The burden of malaria in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. J Infect Dis. 2021;223:1948–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ursing J, Rombo L, Rodrigues A, Aaby P, Kofoed P-E. Malaria transmission in Bissau, Guinea-Bissau between 1995 and 2012: malaria resurgence did not negatively affect mortality. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e101167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Coalson JE, Walldorf JA, Cohee LM, Ismail MD, Mathanga D, Cordy RJ, et al. High prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte infections in school-age children using molecular detection: patterns and predictors of risk from a cross-sectional study in southern Malawi. Malar J. 2016;15:527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Coalson JE, Cohee LM, Buchwald AG, Nyambalo A, Kubale J, Seydel KB, et al. Simulation models predict that school-age children are responsible for most human-to-mosquito Plasmodium falciparum transmission in southern Malawi. Malar J. 2018;17:147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bashir IM, Nyakoe N, van der Sande M. Targeting remaining pockets of malaria transmission in Kenya to hasten progress towards national elimination goals: an assessment of prevalence and risk factors in children from the Lake endemic region. Malar J. 2019;18:233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nankabirwa J, Brooker SJ, Clarke SE, Fernando D, Gitonga CW, Schellenberg D, et al. Malaria in school-age children in Africa: an increasingly important challenge. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19:1294–309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Richard V, Gaudart J, Sokhna C, Wotodjo AN, Raoult D, Diagne N. Malaria risk factors in Dielmo, a Senegalese malaria-endemic village, between October and November of 2013: a case-control study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:565–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tesfahunegn A, Berhe G, Gebregziabher E. Risk factors associated with malaria outbreak in Laelay Adyabo district northern Ethiopia, 2017: case-control study design. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:484.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Programme National de Lutte contre le paludisme (PNLP). Plan Stratégique National de Lutte contre le Paludisme au Sénégal, 2016–2020. 2015.

  21. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. Biomed Inform. 2019;95: 103208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie (ANSD) [Sénégal], et ICF. Enquête Démographique et de Santé Continue (EDS-Continue 2017). Rockville, Maryland, USA; Dakar, Senegal, 2018.

  24. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2019.

  25. Tusting LS, Bottomley C, Gibson H, Kleinschmidt I, Tatem AJ, Lindsay SW, et al. Housing improvements and malaria risk in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country analysis of survey data. PLoS Med. 2017;14: e1002234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Snyman K, Mwangwa F, Bigira V, Kapisi J, Clark TD, Osterbauer B, et al. Poor housing construction associated with increased malaria incidence in a cohort of young Ugandan children. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:1207–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Houngbedji CA, N’Dri PB, Hürlimann E, Yapi RB, Silué KD, Soro G, et al. Disparities of Plasmodium falciparum infection, malaria-related morbidity and access to malaria prevention and treatment among school-aged children: a national cross-sectional survey in Côte d’Ivoire. Malar J. 2015;14:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Habyarimana F, Ramroop S. Prevalence and risk factors associated with malaria among children aged six months to 14 years old in Rwanda: evidence from 2017 Rwanda Malaria Indicator Survey. IJERPH. 2020;17:7975.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. WHO. Adolescent health—the missing population in Universal Health Coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Adeleke O, Balogun FM. Perception of in-school adolescents about adolescent friendly characteristics of healthcare services received in Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2019;17:162–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Abuosi AA, Anaba EA. Barriers on access to and use of adolescent health services in Ghana. J Health Res. 2019;33:197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Donahue C, Robinson J, Granato SA, Tirera F, Billy DA, Koné A, et al. Adolescent access to and utilisation of health services in two regions of Côte d’Ivoire: a qualitative study. Glob Public Health. 2019;14:1302–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. WHO. A standards-driven approach to improve the quality of health-care services for adolescents [Internet]. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2015. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/184035/WHO_FWC_MCA_15.06_eng.pdf?sequence=1

  34. Farea BA, Assabri AM, Aljasari AN, Farea AA, Baktayan NA. Effect of health education on knowledge attitude practice towards malaria among basic schools pupils in Taiz. Health. 2020;12:1299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Agbo H. Supervised school-based health education on malaria: reinforcing pupils’ knowledge. Adv Med Biol Sci Res. 2015;3:74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Manga IA, Gaye A, Dia A, Kouevidjin E, Dos Reis MR, Niang AS, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) to assess the impact of school children’s awareness of malaria using the MOSKI KIT® tool: study case of some Dakar schools in Senegal. Malar J. 2021;20:310.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Malenga T, Kabaghe AN, Manda-Taylor L, Kadama A, McCann RS, Phiri KS, et al. Malaria control in rural Malawi: implementing peer health education for behaviour change. Global Health. 2017;13:84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Abamecha F, Deressa A, Sudhakar M, Abebe L, Kebede Y, Tilahun D, et al. Acceptability of peer learning and education approach on malaria prevention (PLEA-malaria) through primary schools communities in rural Ethiopia: peer educators’ perspectives. Malar J. 2021;20:437.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Timol F, Vawda MY, Bhana A, Moolman B, Makoae M, Swartz S. Addressing adolescents’ risk and protective factors related to risky behaviours: findings from a school-based peer-education evaluation in the Western Cape. Sahara J. 2016;13:197–207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Mens PF, Scheelbeek PF, Al Atabbi H, Enato EF. Peer education: the effects on knowledge of pregnancy related malaria and preventive practices in women of reproductive age in Edo State, Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:610.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Essendi WM, Vardo-Zalik AM, Lo E, Machani MG, Zhou G, Githeko AK, et al. Epidemiological risk factors for clinical malaria infection in the highlands of Western Kenya. Malar J. 2019;18:211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. van Eijk AM, Ramanathapuram L, Sutton PL, Peddy N, Choubey S, Mohanty S, et al. The use of mosquito repellents at three sites in India with declining malaria transmission: surveys in the community and clinic. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:418.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Maia MF, Kliner M, Richardson M, Lengeler C, Moore SJ. Mosquito repellents for malaria prevention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2:CD011595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Agegnehu F, Shimeka A, Berihun F, Tamir M. Determinants of malaria infection in Dembia district, Northwest Ethiopia: a case-control study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:480.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Soe HZ, Thi A, Aye NN. Socioeconomic and behavioural determinants of malaria among the migrants in gold mining, rubber and oil palm plantation areas in Myanmar. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6:142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. The PMI VectorLink Project, Abt Associates Inc. VectorLink Senegal Final Entomological Report: January 1, 2019 – January 31, 2020. [Internet]. Rockville, MD; 2020 Mar. https://www.pmi.gov/docs/default-source/default-document-library/implementing-partner-reports/senegal-2019-entomological-monitoring-final-report.pdf?sfvrsn=4

  47. Durnez L, Coosemans M. Residual Transmission of Malaria: An Old Issue for New Approaches. In: Manguin S (ed). Anopheles mosquitoes - New insights into malaria vectors. InTech; 2013. http://www.intechopen.com/books/anopheles-mosquitoes-new-insights-into-malaria-vectors/residual-transmission-of-malaria-an-old-issue-for-new-approaches

  48. Kilian A, Obi E, Mansiangi P, Abílio AP, Haji KA, Blaufuss S, et al. Variation of physical durability between LLIN products and net use environments: summary of findings from four African countries. Malar J. 2021;20:26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Wilson AL, on behalf of the IPTc Taskforce. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in children (IPTc). PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sacko A, Sagara I, Berthé I, Diarra M, Cissoko M, Diarra SS, et al. Evolution of malaria incidence in five health districts, in the context of the scaling up of seasonal malaria chemoprevention, 2016 to 2018, in Mali. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:840.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Sylla K, Kouly Tine RC, Sow D, Ndiaye M, Sarr A, Tshibola Mbuyi ML, et al. Effect of Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention (SMC) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and amodiaquine (AQ) on the acquisition of anti-AMA1 and anti-MSP1_42 antibodies among children under 10 years living in the southern part of Senegal (Velingara). Malar Chemother Contr Elimin. 2017;6:1.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mahamar A, Issiaka D, Barry A, Attaher O, Dembele AB, Traore T, et al. Effect of seasonal malaria chemoprevention on the acquisition of antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum antigens in Ouelessebougou, Mali. Malar J. 2017;16:289.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Pemberton-Ross P, Smith TA, Hodel EM, Kay K, Penny MA. Age-shifting in malaria incidence as a result of induced immunological deficit: a simulation study. Malar J. 2015;14:287.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Masango TT, Nyadzayo TK, Gombe NT, Juru TP, Shambira G, Chiwanda S, et al. Factors associated with malaria infection in Mudzi District, Mashonaland East Zimbabwe, 2019: a case-control study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1745.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Jeffree SM, Ahmed K, Safian N, Hassan R, Mihat O, Lukman KA, et al. Falciparum malaria outbreak in Sabah linked to an immigrant rubber tapper. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98:45–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Nsereko G, Kadobera D, Okethwangu D, Nguna J, Rutazaana D, Kyabayinze DJ, et al. Malaria outbreak facilitated by appearance of vector-breeding sites after heavy rainfall and inadequate preventive measures: Nwoya District, Northern Uganda, February–May 2018. J Environ Public Health. 2020;2020:5802401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Sharma RK, Rajvanshi H, Bharti PK, Nisar S, Jayswar H, Mishra AK, et al. Socio-economic determinants of malaria in tribal dominated Mandla district enrolled in Malaria Elimination Demonstration Project in Madhya Pradesh. Malar J. 2021;20:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Seebens H. Intra-household bargaining, gender roles in agriculture and how to promote welfare enhancing changes. FAO, Agricultural Development Economics Div. 2011; 2011 Mar. Report No.: ESA Working Paper; 11–10. http://www.fao.org/3/am315e/am315e.pdf

  59. Hildon ZJ-L, Escorcio-Ymayo M, Zulliger R, Arias de Aramburú R, Lewicky N, Harig H, et al. “We have this, with my husband, we live in harmony”: exploring the gendered decision-making matrix for malaria prevention and treatment in Nampula Province, Mozambique. Malar J. 2020;19:133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Orish VN, Agbemafle I, Obum EK, Onyeabor OS, Sanyaolu AO, Okorie C, et al. Socioeconomic risk factors for Plasmodium falciparum infection in primary school children in three districts of the Volta Region of Ghana. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30:1165–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cumber SN, Tsoka-Gwegweni JM. The health profile of street children in Africa: a literature review. J Public Health Afr. 2015;6:566.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr. Baba Camara, Head of the District Health of Saraya, and his team who facilitated the data collection, as well as the population of the study area for their participation in the study. The authors are thankful to Dr. Nicola Viebig, for providing substantial support during the English editing of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Department of Parasitology and Mycology through funding received from the Senegalese National Malaria Control Program and the Malaria Research Capacity Development (MARCAD) program. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Parasitology, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal

    Fassiatou Tairou, Ousmane Sy, Aminatou Kone, Isaac Akhenaton Manga, Khadim Sylla, Souleye Lelo, Cheikh Binetou Fall, Doudou Sow, Magatte Ndiaye, Babacar Faye & Roger C. K. Tine

  2. Ministry of Health and Social Action, Dakar, Senegal

    Abdoulaye Diallo

  3. Malaria Research and Training Center, University of Bamako, Bamako, Mali

    Aminatou Kone

Authors
  1. Fassiatou Tairou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdoulaye Diallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ousmane Sy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aminatou Kone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Isaac Akhenaton Manga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Khadim Sylla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Souleye Lelo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Cheikh Binetou Fall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Doudou Sow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Magatte Ndiaye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Babacar Faye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Roger C. K. Tine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FT and RT conceived, designed the study protocol, and analyzed the data. FT supervised data collection. AD, OS, AK supported the protocol design. FT drafted the manuscript and made final revisions. AD, OS, AK, SL, KS, IAK, DS, BF, CBF, MN, and RT critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fassiatou Tairou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the University Cheikh Anta Diop Institutional Review Board (CER/UCAD/AD/MSN /039/2020). Before the start of the study, administrative authorization was sought from the regional and health district authorities in Kedougou and Saraya. In the field, participation in the study was strictly voluntary. Before any enrollment, written informed consent was obtained from parents or caregivers for adolescents under 18 years old, while 18–19 years old individuals were invited to give consent themselves. In addition, a child assent was sought from 15 to 17 years old participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tairou, F., Diallo, A., Sy, O. et al. Malaria-associated risk factors among adolescents living in areas with persistent transmission in Senegal: a case–control study. Malar J 21, 193 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04212-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04212-8

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us