Skip to main content
Download PDF

Rebound of multiple infections and prevalence of anti-malarial resistance associated markers following malaria upsurges in Dielmo village, Senegal, West Africa

Malaria Journal volume 22, Article number: 257 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Thanks to the scale up of malaria control interventions, the malaria burden in Senegal has decreased substantially to the point that the National Malaria Control Programme plans to achieve malaria elimination by 2030. To guide such efforts, measuring and monitoring parasite population evolution and anti-malarial drugs resistance is extremely important. Information on the prevalence of parasite mutations related to drug resistance can provide a first signal of emergence, introduction and selection that can help with refining drug interventions. The aim of this study was to analyse the prevalence of anti-malarial drug resistance-associated markers before and after the implementation of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) from 2005 to 2014 in Dielmo, a model site for malaria intervention studies in Senegal.

Methods

Samples from both malaria patients and Plasmodium falciparum asymptomatic carriers were analysed with high resolution melting (HRM) technique to genotype P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (Pfcrt) gene haplotypes and multidrug-resistant protein 1 (Pfmdr1) gene at codons N86 and Y184.

Results

Among the 539 samples analysed, 474, 486, and 511 were successfully genotyped for Pfmdr1 N86, Y184, and Pfcrt, respectively. The prevalence of drug resistance markers was high, particularly during the malaria upsurges. Following the scale-up in bed net distribution, only the mutant (86F-like) variant of Pfmdr1 86 was present while during the malaria upsurges the predominance of two types 86Y-86N (43%) and 86F-like (56%) were observed. Most infections (87%) carried the wild type Y-allele at Pfmdr1 184 during the period of nets scale-up while during the malaria upsurges only 16% of infections had wild type and 79% of infections had mixed (mutant/wild) type. The frequency of the mixed genotypes SVMNT-like_CVMNK and SVMNT-like_CVIET within Pfcrt gene was particularly low during bednet scale up. Their frequency increased significantly (P < 0.001) during the malaria upsurges.

Conclusion

This data demonstrated the effect of multiple interventions on the dynamics of drug resistance-associated mutations in the main malaria parasite P. falciparum in an endemic village in Senegal. Monitoring drug resistance markers should be conducted periodically to detect threats of emergence or resurgence that could compromise the efficacy of anti-malarial drugs.

Background

About 20 years ago, the recommended treatment for uncomplicated malaria changed from monotherapy with either chloroquine (CQ) or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) [1]. Such a change, besides providing a highly efficacious treatment to malaria patients, aimed at preventing or at least delaying the emergence and spread of drug resistance [2]. In Senegal, following the implementation of ACT, using artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) as first-line drug combinations in 2006 [3, 4], and the large scale implementation of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) in 2008, malaria morbidity and mortality decreased from 22.2% and 18.2% in 2007 to 5.6% and 7.1% in 2008, respectively [5, 6].

The National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) currently aims to achieve malaria elimination by 2030. However, this may be threatened by the emergence and spread of resistance to artemisinin and/or its partner drugs. Indeed, the spread of chloroquine resistance in the 90 s was associated with 2- or threefold increase in malaria deaths and admissions from severe malaria [7]. Artemisinin resistance, first reported in Asia [8, 9], has been recently detected in Rwanda and Uganda [10, 11]. Therefore, monitoring anti-malarial drug resistance is extremely important to guide elimination efforts.

Molecular markers can be used to detect and monitor the early emergence and subsequent spread of drug resistance [12, 13]. Mutations on the Plasmodium falciparum multidrug-resistant protein 1 (Pfmdr1) gene are associated with reduced amodiaquine (AQ) and artesunate (AS) sensitivity. Pfmdr1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at codons N86 and Y184 have been correlated with AL or ASAQ drug pressure [14]. AQ resistance has been associated with mutation at codon N86 of the Pfmdr1 gene, and cross-resistance between AQ and CQ has been observed [12, 15, 16]. CQ resistance has been associated with mutations at codons K76 of the P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (Pfcrt) gene and at codon N86 of the Pfmdr1 gene [16, 17]. Mutant haplotypes of Pfcrt gene are associated with CQ, AQ, and lumefantrine (LUM) resistance. These include specifically, the Pfcrt 72–76 codon representing either the CVIET or SVMNT haplotypes, depending on the geographical location (CVIET being common in Africa, and SVMNT common in South-east Asia) [18]. The SVMNT haplotype is required for AQ resistance [14]. In Senegal, Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 mutations have been associated to decreased AQ, CQ and artemisinin sensitivity [19, 20]. Nevertheless, no artemisinin resistance mutation in the pfkelch13 propeller domain (K13) has been reported in the country, despite sustained use of ACT [21, 22].

Although the malaria burden has decreased in Dielmo, Central Senegal, following the scale-up of ACT and ITNs [23], there have been two malaria upsurges over the last decade; the first between 2010 and 2011 and the second between 2013 and 2014 [24, 25]. These upsurges were associated with vector’s resistance to pyrethroid and low use of LLINs [24, 26]. However, the contribution of drug resistance in the malaria upsurges was not investigated. Hence, this study evaluated the prevalence of drug resistance molecular markers before and after the implementation of ACT in Dielmo, and during the two malaria upsurges.

Methods

Description of the study area and interventions

The study samples were recruited between 2005 and 2014 in Dielmo, a village in Central Senegal at 280 km south-east of Dakar, where a malaria research project has been ongoing since June 1990 [27]. Malaria in Dielmo was holoendemic, with perennial transmission, until 2009, when it became hypo-endemic with seasonal transmission [23]. Between 2005 and 2006, the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria was a combination of AQ and SP. This was replaced by ASAQ and AL until the end of the study period in 2014. Universal coverage with ITNs has been implemented in Dielmo since 2008, with distribution campaigns in 2011 and 2014. Further distribution campaigns were carried out in 2016 and 2019, outside the study period. Two malaria upsurges occurred in 2010–2011 and in 2013–2014 [24, 28] in Dielmo.

Samples collection

Two types of samples were used for this study: the capillary blood samples and thick blood smears (TBS) from asymptomatic carriers and only TBS from symptomatic patients. TBS were prepared for microscopy; capillary blood samples were collected quarterly in microtubes from cross-sectional surveys carried out between 2005 and 2014. Therefore, for symptomatic patients, DNA extraction was performed only on TBS while for asymptomatic carriers both capillary blood and TBS (when blood samples were not available) were used for DNA extraction.

DNA extraction, selected whole genome amplification and DNA quantification

DNA was extracted using Qiagen minikit, mostly following the manufacturer’s recommendations or with slight modifications. For TBS, 200 µl of PBS was used to resuspend the blood smear and DNA was eluted in 20 µl of elution Buffer. For capillary blood, DNA was eluted in 200 µl of elution Buffer.

Real time PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the var gene multi-copy acidic terminal sequence (varATS) was performed on the extracted DNA to confirm P. falciparum positivity as previously described [29]. Cycle threshold of < 39 was employed as discriminatory criteria for P. falciparum positive samples to be processed for other assays. Plasmodium falciparum selective whole genome amplification (Pf-sWGA) was performed on DNA extracted from TBS to increase the DNA concentration. The Pf-sWGA was performed using a volume of 9.5 µl of nuclease free water, 2.5 µl of Phi 29 Buffer, 15 unit (1.5 µl) of phi29 polymerase, 0.25 µl of BSA, 1 mM (2.5 µl) of dNTPs, 2.5 µM of primer each for a total of 10 primers and > 1.33 ng/µl of DNA in a total reaction volume of 25 µl.

SNPs analysis with high resolution melting (HRM) method

Pf-sWGA DNA were normalised to 5 ng/µl for the high resolution melting (HRM) assay. The assay was performed using the 96 Light-Cycler Roche™ thermocycler [30]. Briefly, 0.7 µl of 10X primers (forward and reverse) were added to 5 µl of HRM Master Mix (Type-it HRM PCR kit (2000) – Qiagen Cat no: 206546) and 3.3 µl of nuclease-free water. One microlitre (1 µl) of DNA was added to the mix for a total reaction volume of 10 µl. The PCR cycling conditions were 95 °C during 300 s for preincubation followed by 50 cycles with denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s and elongation at 72 °C for 20 s. PCR amplification was immediately followed by data acquisition at melt temperature 40 °C for 1 s followed by 95 °C for 30 s and then 40 °C for 1 s. Analysis of acquired data was performed using the Light-cycler software after adjusting the sliding window to the appropriate melt curve for each target. The different types of polymorphisms were defined using Daniel’s nomenclature [30]. Wild and mutant alleles, and the negative control were added to each plate and used to call the alleles of each sample. Reference isolates from the malaria laboratory at the MRC Unit The Gambia were used as controls (Additional file 1: Table S1). The molecular markers targeted in this study are Pfcrt haplotype and Pfmdr1 (N86, Y184). The sequences of the primers are given in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Statistical analysis

Samples were classified by time of collection into four groups, namely before ACT implementation (year 2005); at the time of ACT implementation (year 2007); after ACT implementation and scale up of ITNs (years 2008–2009); and during the two malaria upsurges in 2010–2011 and 2013–2014. Chi-2 test was used to evaluate differences in prevalence of various alleles by period. The significance level was fixed at p = 0.05. Analyses were performed using Stata Software, version 11.0 (College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Study population

Five hundred and thirty-nine samples (55.3%) out of 974 were positive by RT-PCR, of which 71.4% (385/539) were from patients with clinical malaria, and 28.6% (154/539) from asymptomatic cases; and 33% (180/539) were collected during the two malaria upsurges. The distribution of positive samples is shown in Table 1. There was a decline in parasite positive samples following scale up of interventions in 2008–2009. More than 40% (44%, 67/154) of positive samples among asymptomatic P. falciparum carriers were collected in 2007, when ACT became the first-line treatment.

Table 1 Number of P. falciparum positive samples by varATS RT-PCR according to periods
Full size table

Pfmdr1 gene polymorphism at codon N86

Most samples (87.9%, 474/539) were successfully genotyped for Pfmdr1 N86. In 2005, three types of alleles (wild-86N, mutant-86Y, mixed mutant/wild-86Y-86N), and 86F-like (this mutation is uncommon in natural parasite isolates in West Africa, so it is called 86F-like in this study by precaution) were present at similar prevalence, with wild type infections found mainly during this period (Fig. 1). Since 2007, most infections carried the 86F-like allele both in asymptomatic carriers and clinical cases, with an increase of the mixed mutant/wild type (86Y-86N) during the malaria upsurges (Table 2). In 2007, no mutant type was detected among clinical cases while 35% of asymptomatic carriers had mutant 86Y. In 2008 and 2009, the 86F-like type was the only allele present.

Fig.1
figure 1

Distribution of Pfmdr1 N86 haplotype in Dielmo Plasmodium falciparum isolates by period (474 genotypes)

Full size image
Table 2 Prevalence (%) of the Pfmdr1 N86 haplotype by period in asymptomatic carriers and clinical cases
Full size table

Pfmdr1 gene polymorphism at codon Y184

Almost all samples (90.2%, 486/539) were successfully genotyped for Pfmdr1 Y184. The frequency of wild type parasites was extremely low throughout the study period, except for the years 2008–2009 when most infections carried the wild type, while mixed allele infections (mutant and wild) were predominant during the period of malaria upsurges (Fig. 2). Among asymptomatic carriers, mixed infections were more frequent in 2005 and at the time of malaria upsurges, in 2010–2011 and 2013–2014, whereas the mutant type was predominant during ACT implementation, in 2007 (Table 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of Pfmdr1 Y184 haplotype in Dielmo Plasmodium falciparum isolates by period (486 genotypes)

Full size image
Table 3 The number of infections and prevalence (%) of Pfmdr1 184 alleles (wild = Y, mutant = F or mixed = Y/F) by period in asymptomatic carriers and clinical cases
Full size table

For clinical malaria cases, mixed infections were more frequent in 2007 and during malaria upsurges than in 2005, but were least frequent during the period of ITN scale-up (2008–2009). The frequency of mutant and mixed infections showed a similar trend in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, except for 2007, during ACT implementation, where mutant and mixed isolates were higher in asymptomatic carriers and in malaria cases, respectively (Table 3).

Pfcrt codon 72–76 haplotype prevalence

Most samples (94.8%, 511/539) were successfully genotyped for the Pfcrt gene haplotype. In 2005, the wild type CVMNK was found in almost 30% of asymptomatic carriers but in only 6% of clinical malaria cases. The wild type was hardly detected over the remaining years (Table 4). The SVMNT-like CVMNK and the SVMNT-like_CVIET mixed haplotypes were the most frequent among asymptomatic carriers (The SVMNT haplotype has been observed mainly in Asia and rarely in Angola, Tanzania and Cameroon [18, 31,32,33]; therefore it is called SVMNT-like by precaution). Among clinical cases, the haplotype SVMNT-like_CVIET was most common, while the SVMNT-like was found in 83% of infections in 2008–2009 (Table 4). There was no obvious temporal trend although, when considering both asymptomatic carriers and clinical cases, SVMNT-like_CVIET was consistently present across the study period at relatively high frequency, except in 2008–2009 (Fig. 3, Table 4). The frequency of the mixed haplotypes SVMNT-like_CVMNK and SVMNT-like_CVIET was particularly low in 2008–2009, after implementation of ACT and during the scale-up of ITNs. Their frequency increased significantly (P < 0.001) during the malaria upsurges, in 2010–2011 and 2013–2014, reaching higher levels than those observed in 2007, the year of ACT implementation (Table 4).

Table 4 Prevalence (%) of the Pfcrt gene mutations by period in asymptomatic carriers and clinical cases
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of Pfcrt haplotype in Dielmo Plasmodium falciparum isolates by period (511 genotypes)

Full size image

Discussion

Determining the prevalence of specific parasite mutations or haplotype driving anti-malarial drug resistance can inform on the effect of drug interventions and provide signal on how malaria parasite populations are evolving under drug pressure. ACT is currently the only recommended treatments for uncomplicated malaria and any resistance to artemisinin and its partner drugs will constitute a serious threat to malaria control and elimination. This study describes the evolution of molecular markers associated with anti-malarial drugs resistance in a Senegalese village at a time of substantial changes of both the malaria burden and various malaria control interventions.

In Senegal, between 2005 and 2014, the first-line treatment changed from a combination of SP and AQ to ACT, while ITNs and other interventions were scaled up, including seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC). This resulted in a substantial decrease of the malaria burden [5, 6, 34], to the point that the NMCP is currently planning to achieve malaria elimination by 2030. Such changes occurred also in Dielmo, a small village in the Fatick region that has been extensively studied to characterize the dynamic of malaria transmission [23, 27]. Indeed, malaria prevalence in Dielmo decreased substantially over the years, from 72%, in 1990, at the beginning of the project to less than 1% in 2012 [23]. Therefore, the intensive follow-up implemented in Dielmo provides the opportunity to monitor the evolution of anti-malarial drug resistance markers during a period of substantial malaria epidemiological changes. The prevalence of several molecular markers associated to drug resistance [35, 36] changed substantially during the study period, dropping particularly after the scale-up of ITNs and rebounding during the malaria upsurges, in 2010–2011 and 2013–2014, illustrating how multiple selection pressures due to various control interventions can shape the parasite population, as well as the quick regain in fitness of establish drug resistant parasite once interventions are perturbed [37].

The prevalence of drug resistance molecular markers was roughly similar between asymptomatic carriers and clinical cases, except in 2007, at the time of ACT implementation. When considering these two groups together, very few infections carried the wild type alleles, except at codon 184 of Pfmdr1, which was most frequent in 2008–2009, following the scale-up of ITNs. Nevertheless, the Pfmdr1 N86 wild type was only detected in 2005, before the implementation of ACT, while most infections were mutant or mixed during the following years. Replacement of Pfmdr1 N86 wild type isolates with 86Y mutant following the implementation of ACT is indicative of directional selection by artemisinin partner drugs such as AQ and LUM. It has been shown previously that AQ pressure selects for Pfmdr1 86Y mutant parasites while LUM selects for the N86 wild type [14, 35, 38]. The Pfcrt mutations associated with chloroquine resistance followed a similar pattern.

Before and just after the implementation of ACT, there were significantly high frequencies of the Pfmdr1 and Pfcrt mutant and mixed type infections. This is probably due to the high transmission during that period, large number of clinical cases, drug pressure and selection of resistance parasites from earlier implementation of CQ monotherapy (between 1995 and 2003), and the use of the SP and AQ combination from the end of 2003 to May 2006. AQ resistance is mainly associated with the Pfmdr1 86Y mutation, and partly with mutations in the Pfcrt SVMNT haplotype [14, 18, 39, 40], while CQ resistance is mainly associated with 76 T mutant codon at Pfcrt gene [15]. These results differ from those obtained in other sites in Senegal (Dakar and Thiès) where the prevalence of the Pfmdr1 86Y allele was high between 2000 and 2003 but decreased afterwards following the withdrawal of CQ [19, 41]. Dakar and Thiès are large urban centres, where transmission is much lower and adherence to recommended treatment may have allowed for the differences observed. In Malawi, discontinuing CQ use resulted in a decrease of the prevalence of drug resistance markers and restored CQ efficacy [42]. However, in Dielmo this phenomenon was not observed. CQ resistance markers remained high, with the rapid dissemination of the Pfcrt resistance allele, which increased from 8% in 1993 to 46% following the reintroduction of CQ in 1995 [43]. Though other reports show decreasing CQ resistance (both in vitro and prevalence of molecular markers) in other parts of the country, the continuous presence of the Pfcrt resistance alleles ten years after withdrawing CQ as first-line treatment in Dielmo is not in favour of the reintroduction of this treatment [44, 45]. It should be noted however that some Pfcrt resistance alleles especially those in SVMNT haplotype largely uncommon in West Africa are known to be associated with AQ resistance [18, 33, 46, 47]. The SVMNT haplotype has been observed mainly in Asia and sometimes in Tanzania, Angola and Cameroon [18, 31,32,33]. There is a need to sequencing samples from West Africa to inform about the presence of this haplotype since it has an important implication on AQ resistance knowing that AQ is used in many countries as the artemisinin-based combination.

Following the large-scale implementation of ITNs, just before the malaria upsurges, the malaria burden was at its lowest and the wild type Pfmdr1 Y184 allele was the most prevalent, indicating a relatively unaffected parasite population at this locus. During the same period, only one type of allele was observed for Pfmdr1 86 although it was the Pfmdr1 86F-like [18, 48]. This mutation is rare and was not found yet in field samples in West Africa; it is called 86F-like in this study since sequencing to confirm this result was not possible because of the unavailability of the samples (mostly from TBS) and resources. The contribution of the Pfmdr1 86F allele towards AQ resistance is still unknown [18]. The high frequency of SVMNT-like haplotype and the presence of the Pfmdr1 86 F-like mutant during the period of the large-scale implementation of ITNs underline the continuous presence of mutations associated mainly with AQ resistance, while the CVIET haplotype mainly associated with CQ resistance was not found [14, 46]. Conversely, in Dakar and in Thiès, the prevalence of the mutant allele Pfmdr1 86Y gene decreased between 2003 and 2009 [19, 41] while in Dielmo it disappeared after 2007 and was found only in one sample during the malaria upsurges.

During the two malaria upsurges, parasites with the Pfmdr1 184 wild type were almost completely replaced with the mixed type, and two mixed types of Pfmdr1 86 became predominant. The Pfcrt gene was marked by the replacement of the mutant SVMNT-like haplotype by two mixed types. The presence of few mutant parasites and mostly mixed parasites within the Pfmdr1 gene during this period could be associated with artemisinin drug pressure and/or AQ use, as no mutant Pfmdr1 184 was found during 2008–2009. It has been suggested that Pfmdr1 gene amplification may contribute to decreased sensitivity to artemisinin [49, 50]. In this study however, only SNPs were genotyped, which are more relevant to response to artemisinin partner drugs. In Thiès (Senegal), between 2008 and 2011, and in Dakar, between 2010 and 2011, the prevalence of the Pfmdr1 mutant type F184 was found to be high [20, 51, 52]. Isolates from Thiès with this mutant allele also had lower sensitivity to AQ, artemisinin and CQ [20]. SP and AQ were used in Dielmo between 2003 and 2005 before replacement with ASAQ combination during the following years. Given the high adherence to treatment in Dielmo (~ 85% for patients on anti-malarials), significant selection pressure would have been maintained on the parasite population [43].

Polymorphisms observed in Pfmdr1 and Pfcrt genes before and during ACT implementation were most likely associated with AQ and CQ use and selection while those observed during the malaria upsurges were associated with continuous pressure in the implementation of ASAQ artemisinin-based combination. With verbal reports of unusual longer recovery times of patients on ASAQ treatment during the malaria upsurge periods (Mamadou Senghor, pers. commun.), monitoring these variants remain essential for malaria elimination. Ex-vivo and/or in vitro tests would be needed for additional evidence of association of these mutations with the treatment response against specific anti-malarial drugs.

The malaria upsurges in Dielmo ended after the mass distribution campaigns of ITNs in July 2011 and August 2014 for the first and second upsurges, respectively. The village is currently in the pre-elimination phase with current malaria prevalence less than 1% and no local malaria case observed between 2018 and 2021. However, anti-malarial resistance associated markers should be periodically monitored to identify reintroduction from surrounding villages.

Although, this study is limited in its inability to perform sequencing for verification, it is indicative of the dynamics of drug resistance markers following various interventions and changes in disease endemicity. Conversely, prospective studies with better quality specimens (other than TBS) will continue to inform on the current trends to better inform strategies being implemented to maintain the low incidence towards elimination.

Conclusion

The prevalence of drug resistance markers was high in Dielmo, particularly during the malaria upsurges. Monitoring drug resistance markers should be conducted periodically to detect threats of emergence or resurgence that could compromised the efficacy of anti-malarial drugs.

Availability of data and materials

Data can be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Nosten F, White NJ. Artemisinin-based combination treatment of falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:181–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Olliaro PL, Taylor WR. Developing artemisinin based drug combinations for the treatment of drug resistant falciparum malaria: a review. J Postgrad Med. 2004;50:40–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. WHO. World malaria report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. PNLP. Senegal: Directives nationales de prevention et de prise en charge du paludisme. PNLP: Dakar; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. PNLP. Sénégal: Rapport d’activité. Dakar: PNLP; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trape JF, Sauvage C, Ndiaye O, Douillot L, Marra A, Diallo A, et al. New malaria-control policies and child mortality in senegal: reaching millennium development goal 4. J Infect Dis. 2012;205:672–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trape JF, Pison G, Preziosi MP, Enel C, Desgrees du Lou A, Delaunay V, et al. Impact of chloroquine resistance on malaria mortality. C R Acad Sci. 1998;321:689–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, et al. Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:411–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, et al. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:455–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Uwimana A, Legrand E, Stokes BH, Ndikumana JM, Warsame M, Umulisa N, et al. Emergence and clonal expansion of in vitro artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 R561H mutant parasites in Rwanda. Nat Med. 2020;26:1602–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Balikagala B, Fukuda N, Ikeda M, Katuro OT, Tachibana SI, Yamauchi M, et al. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in Africa. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1163–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Djimdé A, Doumbo OK, Cortese JF, Kayentao K, Doumbo S, Diourté Y, et al. A molecular marker for chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:257–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nsanzabana C. Time to scale up molecular surveillance for anti-malarial drug resistance in sub-saharan Africa. Malar J. 2021;20:401.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Eyase FL, Akala HM, Ingasia L, Cheruiyot A, Omondi A, Okudo C, et al. The role of Pfmdr1 and Pfcrt in changing chloroquine, amodiaquine, mefloquine and lumefantrine susceptibility in western-Kenya P. falciparum samples during 2008–2011. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e64299.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tinto H, Guekoun L, Zongo I, Guiguemdé RT, D’Alessandro U, Ouédraogo JB. Chloroquine-resistance molecular markers (Pfcrt T76 and Pfmdr-1 Y86) and amodiaquine resistance in Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:238–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Andriantsoanirina V, Ratsimbasoa A, Bouchier C, Tichit M, Jahevitra M, Rabearimanana S, et al. Chloroquine clinical failures in P. falciparum malaria are associated with mutant Pfmdr-1, not Pfcrt in Madagascar. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13281.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sidhu AB, Verdier-Pinard D, Fidock DA. Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites conferred by pfcrt mutations. Science. 2002;298:210–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Beshir K, Sutherland CJ, Merinopoulos I, Durrani N, Leslie T, Rowland M, et al. Amodiaquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Afghanistan is associated with the pfcrt SVMNT allele at codons 72 to 76. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:3714–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ly O, Gueye PE, Deme AB, Dieng T, Badiane AS, Ahouidi AD, et al. Evolution of the pfcrt T76 and pfmdr1 Y86 markers and chloroquine susceptibility 8 years after cessation of chloroquine use in Pikine. Senegal Parasitol Res. 2012;111:1541–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Tyne D, Dieye B, Valim C, Daniels RF, Sène PD, Lukens AK, et al. Changes in drug sensitivity and anti-malarial drug resistance mutations over time among Plasmodium falciparum parasites in Senegal. Malar J. 2013;12:441.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois AC, Khim N, et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2014;505:50–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Torrentino-Madamet M, Fall B, Benoit N, Camara C, Amalvict R, Fall M, et al. Limited polymorphisms in k13 gene in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Dakar, Senegal in 2012–2013. Malar J. 2014;13:472.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Trape JF, Tall A, Sokhna C, Ly AB, Diagne N, Ndiath O, et al. The rise and fall of malaria in a west African rural community, Dielmo, Senegal, from 1990 to 2012: a 22 year longitudinal study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:476–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Trape JF, Tall A, Diagne N, Ndiath O, Ly AB, Faye J, et al. Malaria morbidity and pyrethroid resistance after the introduction of insecticide-treated bednets and artemisinin-based combination therapies: a longitudinal study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:925–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wotodjo AN, Diagne N, Gaudart J, Richard V, Raoult D, Sokhna C. Malaria risk factors in Dielmo, a Senegalese malaria-endemic village, between October and November of 2013: a case-control study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:565–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wotodjo AN, Richard V, Boyer S, Doucoure S, Diagne N, Touré-Baldé A, et al. The implication of long-lasting insecticide-treated net use in the resurgence of malaria morbidity in a Senegal malaria endemic village in 2010–2011. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:267.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Trape JF, Rogier C, Konate L, Diagne N, Bouganali H, Canque B, et al. The Dielmo project: a longitudinal study of natural malaria infection and the mechanisms of protective immunity in a community living in a holoendemic area of Senegal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994;51:123–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wotodjo AN, Doucoure S, Gaudart J, Diagne N, Diene Sarr F, Faye N, et al. Malaria in Dielmo, a Senegal village: is its elimination possible after seven years of implementation of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets? PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0179528.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hofmann N, Mwingira F, Shekalaghe S, Robinson LJ, Mueller I, Felger I. Ultra-sensitive detection of Plasmodium falciparum by amplification of multi-copy subtelomeric targets. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001788.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Daniels R, Ndiaye D, Wall M, McKinney J, Séne PD, Sabeti PC, et al. Rapid, field-deployable method for genotyping and discovery of single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:2976–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gama BE, Pereira-Carvalho GA, Lutucuta Kosi FJ, Almeida de Oliveira NK, Fortes F, Rosenthal PJ, et al. Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Angola show the StctVMNT haplotype in the pfcrt gene. Malar J. 2010;9:174.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ngassa Mbenda HG, Das A. Occurrence of multiple chloroquine-resistant Pfcrt haplotypes and emergence of the S(agt)VMNT type in Cameroonian Plasmodium falciparum. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:400–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alifrangis M, Dalgaard MB, Lusingu JP, Vestergaard LS, Staalsoe T, Jensen AT, et al. Occurrence of the Southeast Asian/South American SVMNT haplotype of the chloroquine-resistance transporter gene in Plasmodium falciparum in Tanzania. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:1738–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. RBM. Focus on Senegal-progress and impact series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Achieng AO, Muiruri P, Ingasia LA, Opot BH, Juma DW, Yeda R, et al. Temporal trends in prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum molecular markers selected for by artemether-lumefantrine treatment in pre-ACT and post-ACT parasites in western Kenya. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2015;5:92–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sisowath C, Ferreira PE, Bustamante LY, Dahlström S, Mårtensson A, Björkman A, et al. The role of pfmdr1 in Plasmodium falciparum tolerance to artemether-lumefantrine in Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:736–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Apinjoh TO, Mugri RN, Miotto O, Chi HF, Tata RB, Anchang-Kimbi JK, et al. Molecular markers for artemisinin and partner drug resistance in natural Plasmodium falciparum populations following increased insecticide treated net coverage along the slope of mount Cameroon: cross-sectional study. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6:136.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Baliraine FN, Rosenthal PJ. Prolonged selection of pfmdr1 polymorphisms after treatment of falciparum malaria with artemether-lumefantrine in Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:1120–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Holmgren G, Gil JP, Ferreira PM, Veiga MI, Obonyo CO, Björkman A. Amodiaquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in vivo is associated with selection of pfcrt 76T and pfmdr1 86Y. Infect Genet Evol. 2006;6:309–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Holmgren G, Hamrin J, Svärd J, Mårtensson A, Gil JP, Björkman A. Selection of pfmdr1 mutations after amodiaquine monotherapy and amodiaquine plus artemisinin combination therapy in East Africa. Infect Genet Evol. 2007;7:562–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mbaye A, Dieye B, Ndiaye YD, Bei AK, Muna A, Deme AB, et al. Selection of N86F184D1246 haplotype of Pfmrd1 gene by artemether-lumefantrine drug pressure on Plasmodium falciparum populations in Senegal. Malar J. 2016;15:433.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Laufer MK, Thesing PC, Eddington ND, Masonga R, Dzinjalamala FK, Takala SL, et al. Return of chloroquine antimalarial efficacy in Malawi. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1959–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Noranate N, Durand R, Tall A, Marrama L, Spiegel A, Sokhna C, et al. Rapid dissemination of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance despite strictly controlled antimalarial use. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e139.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Ndiaye D, Patel V, Demas A, LeRoux M, Ndir O, Mboup S, et al. A non-radioactive DAPI-based high-throughput in vitro assay to assess Plasmodium falciparum responsiveness to antimalarials–increased sensitivity of P. falciparum to chloroquine in Senegal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82:228–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ndiaye M, Faye B, Tine R, Ndiaye JL, Lo A, Abiola A, et al. Assessment of the molecular marker of Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance (Pfcrt) in Senegal after several years of chloroquine withdrawal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;87:640–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sa JM, Twu O. Protecting the malaria drug arsenal: halting the rise and spread of amodiaquine resistance by monitoring the PfCRT SVMNT type. Malar J. 2010;9:374.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Sá JM, Twu O, Hayton K, Reyes S, Fay MP, Ringwald P, et al. Geographic patterns of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance distinguished by differential responses to amodiaquine and chloroquine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:18883–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Dlamini SV, Beshir K, Sutherland CJ. Markers of anti-malarial drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Swaziland: identification of pfmdr1-86F in natural parasite isolates. Malar J. 2010;9:68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Alker AP, Lim P, Sem R, Shah NK, Yi P, Bouth DM, et al. Pfmdr1 and in vivo resistance to artesunate-mefloquine in falciparum malaria on the Cambodian-Thai border. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:641–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, Brockman A, McGready R, Ashley E, Phaipun L, et al. Mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and increased pfmdr1 gene copy number. Lancet. 2004;364:438–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Fall B, Pascual A, Sarr FD, Wurtz N, Richard V, Baret E, et al. Plasmodium falciparum susceptibility to anti-malarial drugs in Dakar, Senegal, in 2010: an ex vivo and drug resistance molecular markers study. Malar J. 2013;12:107.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Wurtz N, Fall B, Pascual A, Diawara S, Sow K, Baret E, et al. Prevalence of molecular markers of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in Dakar. Senegal Malar J. 2012;11:197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dielmo villagers for their participation to the project. We thank all the staff of IRD and Pasteur Institutes of Dakar for their help during data collection. Amélé Nyedzie Wotodjo thanks Africa research Excellence Fund (AREF) for their research development fellowship AREF-318-WOTO-F-C0872 she received.

Funding

Institut de Recherche pour le Développement and the Pasteur Institute of Dakar funded the data collection. Amélé Nyedzie Wotodjo received research development fellowship AREF-318-WOTO-F-C0872 of Africa Research Excellence Fund (AREF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. VITROME, UMR 257 IRD, Campus UCAD-IRD, Dakar, Senegal

    Amélé Nyedzie Wotodjo, Souleymane Doucoure, Nafissatou Diagne & Cheikh Sokhna

  2. Medical Research Council Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia

    Amélé Nyedzie Wotodjo, Mary Aigbiremo Oboh, Alfred Amambua-Ngwa & Umberto D’Alessandro

  3. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo, Nigeria

    Mary Aigbiremo Oboh

  4. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA

    Mary Aigbiremo Oboh

  5. Institut Pasteur de Dakar, 36 Avenue Pasteur, 220, Dakar, Senegal

    Fatoumata Diène-Sarr & Makhtar Niang

  6. UMR MIVEGEC, Laboratoire de Paludologie et Zoologie Médicale, IRD, Dakar, Senegal

    Jean-François Trape

Authors
  1. Amélé Nyedzie Wotodjo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mary Aigbiremo Oboh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Souleymane Doucoure
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nafissatou Diagne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fatoumata Diène-Sarr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Makhtar Niang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jean-François Trape
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Cheikh Sokhna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Alfred Amambua-Ngwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Umberto D’Alessandro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

UDA, AAN and ANW designed the study. MAO and ANW performed the laboratory work and analysed the results with the contribution of UDA and AAN. ANW and UDA wrote the manuscript with the contribution of MAO, AAN and SD. FDS, ND, MN, JFT and CS supervised the data collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amélé Nyedzie Wotodjo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ministry of Health of Senegal, the assembled village population and the National Ethics Committee of Senegal.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final manuscript and agree to its submission.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Control strains per marker.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Nucleotide sequences and sizes of primers from Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 used to detect point mutations in Plasmodium falciparum genes associated with antimalarial drugs resistance.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wotodjo, A.N., Oboh, M.A., Doucoure, S. et al. Rebound of multiple infections and prevalence of anti-malarial resistance associated markers following malaria upsurges in Dielmo village, Senegal, West Africa. Malar J 22, 257 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04694-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04694-0

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us