Skip to main content
Download PDF

Anopheles gambiae s.s. resistance to pyrethroids and DDT in semi-urban and rural areas of the Moyen-Ogooué Province, Gabon

Malaria Journal volume 22, Article number: 382 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pyrethroids are the main insecticides used in vector control for malaria. However, their extensive use in the impregnation of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying has led to the development of resistance, threatening its success as a tool for malaria control. Baseline data prior to large scale distribution of LLINs are important for the implementation of efficient strategies. However, no data on the susceptibility of malaria vectors is available in the Moyen-Ogooué Province in Gabon. The aim of this study was to assess the susceptibility to pyrethroids and organochlorides of malaria vectors from a semi-urban and rural areas of the province and to determine the frequency of insecticide resistance genes.

Methods

Larvae were collected from breeding sites in Lambaréné and Zilé and reared to adults. Three to five-day old female Anopheles gambiae sensu lato mosquitoes were used in cone tube assays following the WHO susceptibility tests protocol for adult mosquitoes. A subsample was molecularly identified using the SINE200 protocol and the frequency of Vgsc-1014 F and − 1014 S mutations were determined.

Results

Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) was the sole species present in both Lambaréné and Zilé. Mosquito populations from the two areas were resistant to pyrethroids and organochlorides. Resistance was more pronounced for permethrin and DDT with mortality lower than 7% for both insecticides in the two study areas. Mosquitoes were statistically more resistant (P < 0.0001) to deltamethrin in Lambaréné (51%) compared to Zilé (76%). All the mosquitoes tested were heterozygous or homozygous for the knockdown resistance (Kdr) mutations Vgsc-L1014F and Vgsc-L1014S with a higher proportion of Vgsc-L1014F homozygous in Lambaréné (76.7%) compared to Zilé (57.1%).

Conclusion

This study provides evidence of widespread resistance to pyrethroids in An. gambiae s.s., the main malaria vector in the Moyen-Ogooué Province. Further investigation of the mechanisms underlining the resistance of An. gambiae s.s. to pyrethroids is needed to implement appropriate insecticide resistance management strategies.

Background

Vector control has been pivotal for malaria control, with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) being the two main strategies used. It is estimated that these intervention especially LLINs have averted 69% of the 663 million malaria cases [1]. Five classes of insecticides are used in vector control: (1) pyrethroids, (2) carbamates, (3) organophosphates, (4) organochlorides and (5) chlorfenapyr, a pyrrole which recently received an interim approval from the World Health Organization (WHO) to be used in insecticide-treated nets and in IRS [2].

However, up to now, insecticides of the pyrethroid class are mostly used for impregnating bed nets. This reliance on a sole class of insecticides has led to the development and spread of resistance in major Anopheles vectors in Africa [3,4,5,6,7], especially following mass distribution of LLINs [8]. Two mutations (L1014F and L1014S) at the domain II of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene (Vgsc) have been identified as providing cross-resistance to pyrethroids and DDT in Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) [9, 10]. Although the consequences of this resistance on vector control measures are not fully elucidated, some studies have shown a loss of efficacy of LLINs in areas with insecticide resistance [4, 11, 12].

Malaria remains a public health issue in Gabon where it is a primary reason for consultation. Malaria prevention in Gabon is based on the provision of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) to pregnant women who are in addition provided LLINs which are also freely available to children under five [13]. Despite the absence of LLIN mass distribution, previous studies have reported high frequencies of the Vgsc-L1014F and Vgsc-L1014S mutations in Anopheles populations from Libreville, Port-Gentil, Mouila and in villages of the Moyen-Ogooué province (Bindo, Zilé and Nombakélé) and in a lower frequency in Benguia [14,15,16,17,18]. In fact, Libreville was the first coastal West African location where the presence of both Vgsc-L1014F and Vgsc-L1014S alleles was reported suggesting the presence of high level of resistance in this mosquito population [19]. This may need re-evaluation of the effectivity of LLINs for the control of malaria morbidity in the country. However, only a single study assessed the phenotypic resistance in mosquitoes populations in Gabon [17] and there is a lack of data on the susceptibility of malaria vectors to insecticides from many parts of the country.

The aim of this study was to assess the susceptibility to pyrethroids and organochlorides of malaria vectors from two different settings of the Province of Moyen-Ogooué and to determine the frequency of insecticide resistance genes.

Methods

Study areas

The study was conducted in Lambaréné and Zilé from November 2017 to February 2018 (Fig. 1). Lambaréné is a semi urban area and is the provincial capital of the Moyen-Ogooué Province while Zilé is a rural area located approximately 12 km from Lambaréné. Although the two areas are close, a previous study in the Zilé area has showed that malaria transmission in this area is perennial with a fixation of the Vgsc-L1014F and Vgsc-L1014S resistant alleles in An. gambiae s.s. populations [18]. In addition, Zilé has the particularity of housing a rubber plantations scheme with the potential use of insecticides to deal with plant pests (although not assessed here) potentially driving the resistance of An. gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) populations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the studied areas

Full size image

Mosquito collection

Open water bodies in the areas were explored for the presence of anophelinae larvae by dipping and larvae were collected from breeding sites with the presence of larvae in the two areas. The larvae were reared up to the adult stage at the Medical Entomology Laboratory of the Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL). Emerging mosquitoes were provided with 10% sugar solution until the day of the testing. Adult mosquitoes were identified using the morphological identification keys of Gillies and de Meillon [20] and Gillies and Coetzee [21].

WHO susceptibility assays

The tests were carried out using impregnated papers with the following diagnostics concentrations: deltamethrin (0.05%), permethrin (0.75%) and DDT (4%) produced by the Vector Control Research Unit of Sains Malaysia University (Penang, Malaysia) and kindly provided by the Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC). The impregnated papers were tested with the Kisumu strain reared at the CERMEL before the tests were conducted with field collected mosquitoes to assess their quality. The results from the tests with the Kisumu were also used as comparators to the knockdown times obtained with field populations.

The tests were carried out according to the WHO protocol [22]. Briefly, three-to-five-day old, starved An. gambiae s.l. mosquitoes were exposed in WHO susceptibility kits to impregnated papers with insecticides while controls mosquitoes were exposed to untreated filter papers. The number of mosquitoes knocked down was recorded at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min. After 1 h of exposure, mosquitoes were transferred to observation tubes and were maintained on a 10% sugar solution for 24 h. Mortality was recorded after a 24-hr recovery period. The mosquitoes were stored on silica gel for molecular assays.

Molecular identification

DNA was extracted from randomly selected control mosquitoes from Lambaréné and Zilé using the Livak protocol [23]. The mosquitoes were identified using the SINE200 protocol [24]. This protocol allows for the simultaneous identification of members of the An. gambiae complex using the following set of primers: forward (5′-TCG CCT TAG ACC TTG CGT TA-3′) and reverse (5′-CGC TTC AAG AAT TCG AGA TAC-3′) primers. The cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 54 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were analysed on a 2% agarose gel.

kdr genotyping

A Taqman assay was used to determine the frequency of kdr mutations (Vgsc-L1014F and L1014S) in dead and alive mosquitoes based on the protocol from Bass et al. [25]. The protocol is based on the use of one set of primers (5′-CAT TTT TCT TGG CCA CTG TAG TGA T-3′; kdr-reverse: 5′-CGA TCT TGG TCC ATG TTA ATT TGC A-3) and three probes: one for the identification of the wild-type allele (5′-CTT ACG ACT AAA TTTC-3′) labelled with the HEX fluorophore, and the remaining two labelled with the FAM fluorophore for the identification of the Vgsc-L1014F mutation (5′-ACG ACA AAA TTT C-3′) and the Vgsc-L1014S mutation (5′-ACG ACT GAA TTT C-3′). The cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s and 65 °C for 45 s.

Statistical analysis

The WIN DL (version 2.0, 1999) software was used to determine the different knockdown times for 50 and 95% tested samples knockdown times from each population (KDT50, KDT95) using a log-time probit model.

Mortality was calculated by dividing the proportion of dead mosquitoes after the 24 h recovery period to mosquitoes exposed to the insecticide. The results of the test were interpreted based on the WHO guidelines [26] with mortality in the range 98–100% indicating susceptibility, while 90–97% mortality indicating potential resistance and a need to be further investigated. Mortality rates of less than 90% were interpreted as resistance.

The sample size of mosquitoes to be analysed for the molecular identification was based on an estimated proportion of An. gambiae s.s. equals to 98%. The following formula: n = ε2 [p (1-p)]/e2; with ε = 1.96 (alpha risk = 5%), e (precision) = 5% and p = expected prevalence; with the resulting n = 31 to be included from each site.

The differences in mortality and allelic frequencies in the mosquito populations from the two areas were compared using the Fisher’s exact test with the R software v.3.2.5 [26]. In addition, the distribution of genotypes was also tested for conformity to Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) within each site using a web-based tool (https://gene-calc.pl/hardy-weinberg-page).

Results

A total of 537 An. gambiae s.l. collected from Lambaréné and Zilé were tested in susceptibility assays. In Lambaréné, 85 mosquitoes were tested with permethrin, 130 mosquitoes with deltamethrin and 44 with DDT. Meanwhile in Zilé, 113 mosquitoes were tested with permethrin, 117 mosquitoes with deltamethrin and 99 with DDT.

Species composition

Out of the 116 An. gambiae s.l. that were identified molecularly, 54 out of 60 mosquitoes and all mosquitoes (56 mosquitoes) were successfully amplified in Lambaréné and Zilé, respectively. Anopheles gambiae s.s. was the sole species found in both Lambaréné and Zilé.

Knockdown times

The KDT50 and KDT95 could only be determined for deltamethrin while for permethrin and DDT, both were above 60 min. The KDT50 for deltamethrin were around 32 min and 30 min for An. gambiae from Lambaréné and Zilé, respectively (Table 1). When compared to the KDT50 of the susceptible Kisumu strain, these KDT50 represented a 3.4 and 3.1-fold increase in the amount of time required to knockdown 50% of the An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes from Lambaréné and Zilé, respectively. Similarly, there was an increase in KDT95 (58 min in mosquitoes from Lambaréné and 48 min in Zilé) for deltamethrin when compared to the one from the susceptible Kisumu strain, representing a 2.6 and a 1.6-fold increase.

Table 1 Knockdown times and ratios of An. gambiae s.s. samples from Lambaréné and Zilé after insecticide susceptibility tests
Full size table

Insecticide susceptibility of An. gambiae s.s.

The mosquitoes from Lambaréné and Zilé were found to be resistant to permethrin, deltamethrin, and DDT but the resistance was more pronounced for permethrin and DDT (Fig. 2). The mortalities recorded after the 24 h recovery period with permethrin and DDT were below 3% for both insecticides in Lambaréné. Whilst in Zilé, mortality with permethrin and DDT were 6% and 2%, respectively. The mortality rates for permethrin (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.30) and DDT (Fisher’s exact test, P = 1) were comparable in both study areas. Anopheles gambiae s.s. mosquitoes from Lambaréné were significantly more resistant to deltamethrin (Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.0001) than those from Zilé, with mortalities of 51% and 76%, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mortality rates of An. gambiae s.s. from Lambaréné and Zilé exposed to deltamethrin, permethrin and DDT. The green line represents the threshold for full susceptibility according to the WHO criteria

Full size image

Genotypic resistance markers

Out of the 118 mosquitoes that were randomly screened for kdr mutations, 116 (98%) were successfully amplified. All the mosquitoes were heterozygous (80.2%) or homozygous (19.8%) for Vgsc-L1014F and -L1014S which confer resistance to pyrethroids and DDT. The distribution of the resistant genotypes were similar in Lambaréné and Zilé (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.068) with a higher proportion of homozygous Vgsc-L1014F (76.7% and 57.1%, respectively), followed by heterozygous individuals Vgsc-L1014F/L1014S (20% and 32.1%, respectively) with the rest made of homozygous Vgsc-L1014S (Table 2) (2% and 6%, respectively). However, the distribution of the genotypes were consistent with HWE in Lambaréné (χ2 = 1.09; p = 0.58) and Zilé (χ2 = 1.82; p = 0.40). None of the mosquitoes were found to carry the susceptible allele Vgsc-L1014L.

Table 2 Frequencies of knock-down resistance (kdr) alleles An. gambiae s.s. from Lambaréné and Zilé
Full size table

Discussion

Vector controls measures should be implemented based on the local epidemiological and entomological data. Thus, there is a need to determine the susceptibility of local vectors to the common types of insecticides before large vector control measures are deployed in an area. This report provides baseline data on the phenotypic susceptibility of malaria vectors in the Moyen-Ogooué Province. Results from the current study revealed a substantial increase of KDT50 and KDT95, when compared to the Kisumu susceptible strain, beyond 60 min for permethrin and DDT. Whereas for deltamethrin, although KDT50 and KDT95 were below 60 min, it represented a 3-fold increase in KDT50 and up to a 2.6- fold increase in KDT95 when compared to the susceptible An. gambiae s.s. Kisumu strain. Similar increases in KDT50 were also recorded in susceptibility tests carried out in Mouila, the capital of the Ngounié province of Gabon [17]. This loss of susceptibility to the knockdown effect of pyrethroids may lead to the loss of the deterrence effect to this class of insecticide which are used in impregnating bed nets. This deterrence effect is of great importance in maintaining LLINs effectiveness especially when they are torn [11] as they prevent entry of mosquitoes. These results suggest that pyrethroid based insecticides are widely used in the local populations.

The mortality rates recorded for each of the insecticides tested are in line with the knockdown results suggesting An. gambiae s.s. from the area are highly resistant to pyrethroids and DDT. Anopheles gambiae s.s. populations were highly resistant to DDT and permethrin, a type I pyrethroid. Previous reports from other countries [5, 7, 27, 28] have shown a high resistance to permethrin, which is, together with deltamethrin, the main insecticides used in bed nets impregnation. Resistance to deltamethrin, a type II pyrethroid, was less pronounced than for permethrin thus LLINs impregnated with deltamethrin may be a better option for vector control in the Moyen-Ogooué Province and by extension to Gabon, as the current results are in line with those found in the Ngounié province for permethrin and deltamethrin [17].

The resistance in this study was more pronounced in the urban compared to the rural area despite the fact that the larval collection in the latter was carried out in an area surrounded with rubber and palm oil plantations where insecticides, such as pyrethroids, may be used for pest control as reported in agricultural settings in Burkina Faso [29, 30]. However, from discussions held with personnels from both rubber and palm oil plantations, insecticides are not used for pest controls with the plants only sprayed with the herbicide glyphosate which is not linked to pyrethroids resistance. Therefore, the personal use of pyrethroids based vector control tools in the form of insecticide sprays, mosquito coil, impregnated nets could play a major role in the selection pressure of local Anopheles spp for reduced susceptibility to pyrethroids especially in urban areas. This high level of resistance could lead to the failure of control measures to reduce malaria transmission especially using bed nets that are impregnated with pyrethroids. These results point to the need for the implementation of mitigation strategies such as the use of LLINs impregnated with compounds such as piperonyl butoxide (PBO), which inhibits cytochrome P450, involved in metabolic resistance, and thereby can restore pyrethroid susceptibility.

Increases in KDT50 in field mosquito populations has been suggested to provide a sensitive indicator of the implication of kdr mutations in phenotypic resistance to pyrethroids [22, 31]. The kdr mutations in the local populations are fixed with all An. gambiae s.s. carrying either the Vgsc-L1014F or Vgsc-L1014S mutations which may explain the loss of knockdown effects of deltamethrin, permethrin and DDT. These results are in line with previous reports [14,15,16,17] from other parts of Gabon especially in Zilé [18], where high proportions of An. gambiae were carrying the kdr mutations. However, the fact that metabolic resistance was not assessed constitute a limitation to the present study as the differences in KDTs observed between the three insecticides (DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin) who have similar target sites, suggest the involvement of other resistance mechanisms.

Conclusion

The current study revealed a high level of resistance of An. gambiae s.s. in both Lambaréné and Zilé accompanied with a high frequency of the Vgsc-L1014F mutations. The resistance level was higher for permethrin and DDT compared to deltamethrin. Therefore, deltamethrin may be a better option for malaria vector control in the Moyen-Ogooué Province. However, the involvement of other resistance mechanisms should be further investigated for the introduction of control measures adapted to the local settings.

Availability of data and materials

Raw data are archived and available on request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

WHO:

World Health Organization

LLIN:

Long-lasting insecticidal net

IRS:

Indoor Residual Spraying

Vgsc:

voltage-gated sodium channel IPTp-SP:intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine

OCEAC:

Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale

kdr:

Knockdown resistance gene

PBO:

piperonyl butoxide

CERMEL:

Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné

DDT:

dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

SINE200 :

Short INterspersed Element

KDT:

Knockdown Time

References

  1. WHO. World Malaria report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. Report of the twentieth WHOPES working group meeting review of: Interceptor G2 LN Dawaplus 3.0 LN Dawaplus 4.0 LN Sumilarv 2 MR Chlorfenapyr 240 SC. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bigoga JD, Manga L, Titanji VPK, Etang J, Coetzee M, Leke RGF. Susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) to pyrethroids, DDT and carbosulfan in coastal Cameroon. Afr Entomol. 2007;15:133–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Etang J, Pennetier C, Piameu M, Bouraima A, Chandre F, Awono-Ambene P, et al. When intensity of deltamethrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l leads to loss of long lasting insecticidal nets bio-efficacy: a case study in north Cameroon. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Elanga-Ndille E, Binyang A, Ndo C, Assatse T, Nouage L, Tchouakui M, et al. Entomological indicators of malaria transmission and insecticide resistance profile of Anopheles gambiae at the early phase of irrigated rice farming in the forest area of central Cameroon. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ndo C, Kopya E, Donbou MA, Njiokou F, Awono-Ambene P, Wondji C. Elevated Plasmodium infection rates and high pyrethroid resistance in major Malaria vectors in a forested area of Cameroon highlight challenges of malaria control. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Boussougou-sambe ST, Eyisap WE, Canis G, Tasse T, Mandeng SE, Mbakop LR, et al. Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) in South-West Cameroon four years after long-lasting insecticidal net mass distribution. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Padonou GG, Sezonlin M, Ossé R, Aizoun N, Oké-agbo F, Oussou O, et al. Impact of three years of large scale indoor residual spraying (IRS) and Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs) interventions on insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l in Benin. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5: 72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Bergé JB, Devonshire AL, et al. Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998;7:179–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule JM, Wang X, Hemingway J, Collins FH. Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2000;9:491–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ochomo EO, Bayoh NM, Walker ED, Abongo BO, Ombok MO, Ouma C, et al. The efficacy of long-lasting nets with declining physical integrity may be compromised in areas with high levels of pyrethroid resistance. Malar J. 2013;12: 368.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tchouakui M, Mugenzi LMJ, Menze BD, Khaukha JNT, Tchapga W, Tchoupo M, et al. Pyrethroid resistance aggravation in Ugandan Malaria vectors is reducing bednet efficacy. Pathogens. 2021;10: 415.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bouyou-Akotet MK, Mawili-Mboumba DP, Kendjo E, Mabika-Mamfoumbi M, Ngoungou EB, Dzeing-Ella A, et al. Evidence of decline of malaria in the general hospital of Libreville, Gabon from 2000 to 2008. Malar J. 2009;8: 300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Santolamazza F, Calzetta M, Etang J, Barrese E, Dia I, Caccone A, et al. Distribution of knock-down resistance mutations in Anopheles gambiae molecular forms in west and west-central Africa. Malar J. 2008;7: 74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mourou J-R, Coffinet T, Jarjaval F, Pradines B, Amalvict R, Rogier C, et al. Malaria transmission and insecticide resistance of Anopheles gambiae in Libreville and Port-Gentil, Gabon. Malar J. 2010;9: 321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mourou J-R, Coffinet T, Jarjaval F, Cotteaux C, Pradines E, Godefroy L. Malaria transmission in Libreville: results of a one year survey. Malar J. 2012;11: 40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Koumba AA, Zinga-koumba CR, Nguema Mintsa R, Comlan P, Asseko GN, Razack Safiou A, et al. Current sensitivity status of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) (Culicidae) to DDT and pyrethroids in two agricultural sites of Mouila, Gabon. Int J Mosq Res. 2019;6:12–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boussougou-Sambe ST, Woldearegai TG, Doumba-Ndalembouly AG, Ngossanga B, Mba RB, Edoa JR, et al. Assessment of malaria transmission intensity and insecticide resistance mechanisms in three rural areas of the Moyen Ogooué Province of Gabon. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinto J, Lynd A, Elissa N, Donnelly MJ, Costa C, Gentile G, et al. Co-occurrence of East and West African kdr mutations suggests high levels of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Anopheles gambiae from Libreville, Gabon. Med Vet Entomol. 2006;20:27–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gillies MT, de Meillon B. The anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara (Ethiopian Region). South Afr Inst Med Res. 1968;54:1–343.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gillies MT, Coetzee M. A supplement to the anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara (afrotropical region). South Afr Inst Med Res. 1987;55:1–143.

    Google Scholar 

  22. WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vectors mosquitoes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Livak KJ. Organization and mapping of a sequence on the Drosophila melanogaster X and Y chromosomes that is transcribed during spermatogenesis. Genetics. 1984;107:611–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Santolamazza F, Mancini E, Simard F, Qi Y, Tu Z, della Torre A. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malar J. 2008;7: 163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bass C, Nikou D, Donnelly MJ, Williamson MS, Ranson H, Ball A, et al. Detection of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Anopheles gambiae: a comparison of two new high-throughput assays with existing methods. Malar J. 2007;6: 111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. World Health Organization. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alou LPA, Koffi AA, Adja MA, Assi SB, Kouassi PK, Guessan RN. Status of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.s M form prior to the scaling up of long lasting Insecticidal nets (LLINs) in Adzopé, Eastern Côte d’Ivoire. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5: 289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Toé KH, Jones CM, Fale SN, Ismail HM. Increased pyrethroid resistance in malaria vectors and decreased bed net effectiveness, Burkina Faso. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1691–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Akogbeto M, Guiguemde TR, Darriet F, et al. The role of agricultural use of insecticides in resistance to pyrethroids in Anopheles gambiae s.l in Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:617–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nkya TE, Poupardin R, Laporte F, Akhouayri I, Mosha F, Magesa S, et al. Impact of agriculture on the selection of insecticide resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae: a multigenerational study in controlled conditions. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:480.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chandre F, Darrier F, Manga L, Akogbeto M, Faye O, Mouchet J, et al. Status of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae Sensu Lato. Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77:230–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Theo Nzoughe-Nzeng, Eddi Wilfrid Mangaboula Mangaboula. The authors thank Ynous Djida, Jean Claude Toto and Prof. Charles Wondji for technical assistance.

Funding

This work was funded by a grant from the German Research Foundation, grant number: MO 1071/12 − 1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné, Lambaréné, Gabon

    Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe, Barclaye Ngossanga, Ange Gatien Doumba-Ndalembouly, Lynda Nouage Boussougou, Fabrice Mougeni, Jean Ronald Edoa, Jean Claude Dejon-Agobé, Peter G. Kremsner, Steffen Borrmann, Benjamin Mordmüller & Ayôla Akim Adegnika

  2. Institut für Tropenmedizin, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany

    Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe, Tamirat Gebru Woldearegai, Peter G. Kremsner, Steffen Borrmann, Benjamin Mordmüller & Ayôla Akim Adegnika

  3. Université des sciences et techniques de Masuku, Masuku, Gabon

    Thierry Ndong Mba & Hilaire M. Kenguele

  4. Institut de Recherche de Yaoundé, Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), B.P. 288, Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Parfait Awono-Ambene

  5. German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Tübingen, Germany

    Tamirat Gebru Woldearegai, Peter G. Kremsner & Ayôla Akim Adegnika

  6. Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Benjamin Mordmüller

  7. Fondation pour la Recherche Scientifique (FORS), Cotonou, Benin

    Ayôla Akim Adegnika

Authors
  1. Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barclaye Ngossanga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ange Gatien Doumba-Ndalembouly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lynda Nouage Boussougou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tamirat Gebru Woldearegai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fabrice Mougeni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thierry Ndong Mba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jean Ronald Edoa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jean Claude Dejon-Agobé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Parfait Awono-Ambene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Peter G. Kremsner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hilaire M. Kenguele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Steffen Borrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Benjamin Mordmüller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ayôla Akim Adegnika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AAA, BM, PGK, PAA, HMK, SB, JCDA, TGW, JRE and STBS conceived and planned the study and its design. STBS, AGDN and BN performed the field activities. STBS, LNB, AGDN BN and TGW carried out the laboratory analysis of the samples. FM and STBS analysed the data. STBS drafted the manuscript. AAA, BM, PGK, PAA, HMK, SB, JCDA, TGW, JRE critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors made intellectual input to the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. STBS, AGDN, BN and AAA are members of CANTAM (EDCTP-CSA 2020 NOE-3100) networks.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors concur with the submission presented by the corresponding author.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boussougou-Sambe, S.T., Ngossanga, B., Doumba-Ndalembouly, A.G. et al. Anopheles gambiae s.s. resistance to pyrethroids and DDT in semi-urban and rural areas of the Moyen-Ogooué Province, Gabon. Malar J 22, 382 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04820-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04820-y

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us