Skip to main content
Download PDF

Entomological indicators of Plasmodium species transmission in Goma Tsé-Tsé and Madibou districts, in the Republic of Congo

Malaria Journal volume 23, Article number: 21 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Malaria remains a major public health problem in the Republic of Congo, with Plasmodium falciparum being the deadliest species of Plasmodium in humans. Vector transmission of malaria is poorly studied in the country and no previous report compared rural and urban data. This study aimed to determine the Anopheles fauna and the entomological indices of malaria transmission in the rural and urban areas in the south of Brazzaville, and beyond.

Methods

Indoor household mosquitoes capture using electric aspirator was performed in rural and urban areas during raining and dry seasons in 2021. The identification of Anopheles species was done using binocular magnifier and nested-PCR. TaqMan and nested-PCR were used to detect the Plasmodium species in the head/thorax and abdomens of Anopheles. Some entomological indices including the sporozoite infection rate, the entomological inoculation rate and the man biting rate were estimated.

Results

A total of 699 Anopheles mosquitoes were collected: Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) (90.7%), Anopheles funestus s.l. (6.9%), and Anopheles moucheti (2.4%). Three species of An. gambiae s.l. were identified including Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (78.9%), Anopheles coluzzii (15.4%) and Anopheles arabiensis (5.7%). The overall sporozoite infection rate was 22.3% with a predominance of Plasmodium falciparum, followed by Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale. Anopheles aggressiveness rate was higher in households from rural area (1.1 bites/night) compared to that from urban area (0.8 ib/p/n). The overall entomological inoculation rate was 0.13 ib/p/n. This index was 0.17 ib/p/n and 0.092 ib/p/n in rural and in urban area, respectively, and was similar during the dry (0.18 ib/p/n) and rainy (0.14 ib/p/n) seasons.

Conclusion

These findings highlight that malaria transmission remains high in rural and urban area in the south of Republic of Congo despite the ongoing control efforts, thereby indicating the need for more robust interventions.

Background

Malaria remains a major public health problem worldwide, with 247 million cases reported in 2021 compared to 245 million cases in 2020 [1]. The estimated number of malaria deaths stood at 619,000 in 2021, compared to 625 000 in 2020 [1]. The sub-Saharan countries continue to carry the heaviest burden of the disease (about 95% of the cases and 96% of deaths) [1].

Malaria parasite is transmitted to people through the bites of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes [2]. A total of 484 Anopheles mosquitoes species have been described across the world, and 70 are known as malaria vectors, with only 30–40 species being able to transmit in Africa [2, 3]. Many factors have been reported to influence the epidemiology and severity of malaria disease in endemic setting, including the heterogeneity of the environment, the degradation of the forests, the extent of unplanned urbanization, the development of urban agriculture, and the degree of human migration from rural to urban areas [4,5,6,7].

In Central Africa, the diversity of mosquitoes and the malaria transmission dynamic have been widely studied, mainly in Cameroon, Gabon and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) [6, 8]. In this Central Africa sub-region, about eighteen anopheline species have been reported to be involved in the transmission of Plasmodium parasites [2, 3]. This include major vector species, such as Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.), Anopheles coluzzii, Anopheles arabiensis, Anopheles funestus, Anopheles nili, Anopheles moucheti which are known for their high anthropophilic behaviour [2, 3, 9]. Some of these vectors exhibit the ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions [10, 11], even though each of them shows ecological preferences.

The Republic of Congo is one of the 54 countries where malaria transmission remains worrisome. According to the report of the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), malaria is responsible for 63% of medical consultations, 20% of hospitalization rate and 9% of deaths in the country [12]. The transmission of the disease in the Republic of Congo is perennial, and differs between urban, peri-urban and rural areas, with Plasmodium falciparum as the major Plasmodium species [13, 14].

The latest data on the Anopheles fauna in the Republic of Congo dates back to 1985 and described the presence of seven species, An. gambiae sensu lato (s.l.), An. funestus s.l., An. nili, An. moucheti, Anopheles paludis, Anopheles pharoensis and Anopheles hankocki, with species of the An. gambiae group being the major vectors of malaria transmission during that period [15, 16]. The vector control of malaria in Congo relies particularly on the use of long-lasting insecticide-treated mosquito nets approved by the NMCP [13]. So far, there is a scarcity of data comparing the entomological indicators of the transmission of Plasmodium species infection in rural and urban setting in Republic of Congo. Basic information about the Anopheles fauna and the entomological indices of malaria transmission in the communities, are critical for planning and implementing anti-vector control measures in the country. The present study aimed to characterize the Anopheles fauna and determine the entomological indices of malaria transmission in the southern of Brazzaville and beyond.

Methods

Study sites

The study was conducted in the rural area of Pool (Goma Tsé-Tsé district: Ntoula and Djoumouna villages) and the urban area of Brazzaville (Mayanga) characterized by a major bio-ecological belts [13] (Fig. 1). The departments of Brazzaville and Pool are situated in the south of Republic of Congo. This part of the country have a tropical humid climate divided in two seasons: dry season (from June to September, and January to February) and rainy season (from October to January, and March to May). These study sites have different sociological and ecological characteristics which can be considered as representative regions of the Congolese savannah and degraded forest biotopes capable of sheltering the different species of the Culicidae mosquito family. The Goma Tsé-Tsé district is geo-localized at 4° 24′ 44" S, 15° 8′ 31" E and is situated at average altitude of 293 m. The Madibou district is localized between 4° 18′ 35" S, 15° 11′ 30" E [17]. The average humidity varies between 78 and 84%. Goma Tsé-Tsé district is located at about 15 km from Brazzaville in an area of degraded secondary forest and savannah. It is characterized by the presence of a gallery forest bordering the permanent Djoumouna river and Ntoula river [13]. This locality is surrounded by many rivers including Lomba, Kinkoue, Loumbangala, Djoumouna, Loumou and Congo rivers which supply to a series of fish farming ponds [18] that can serve as the potential foci of malaria vectors. The main activities in this area are farming and fishing. Mayanga is an urban area of the Madibou district situated in the south of Brazzaville. It is characterized by the presence of three site of market gardening (Agri-Congo 1 and 2 and the Groupement Jean Felicien Mahouna), and irrigated by three rivers including Djoué, Laba and Matou rivers [13]. Mayanga accounts several public and private service such as the health centres, the primary and high schools.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Republic of Congo (A) showing localities surveyed in Goma Tsé-Tsé (B) and Madibou (C) district. In Goma Tsé-tsé district, the size of the red dot represents the selected village (Ntoula and Djoumouna), and in Madibou district the red striped area represents the selected city (Mayanga) for the survey

Full size image

Study design and adult mosquito collection

A cross-sectional survey study was carried out during raining and dry seasons, from March to September 2021. The mosquitoes were collected every morning (5:00 am to 10:00 am) in the households of the participants after obtaining their informed consent form. The indoor capture of mosquitoes resting on the walls and roofs of houses was undertaken using the electric aspirator as previously described (Rule In-Line Blowers, Model 240). The captured mosquitoes in each dwelling were placed in the cups with the code or the identification number of the house. The blood-fed mosquitoes were kept for two days in the cup before processing, in order to allow the complete digestion of human blood in their digestive tract. Data were registered in well-structured collection sheets including the district name, household identification number, type of house, number of bedrooms, and number of people living in the household, number of trapped mosquitoes, date and time of mosquitoes collection. The mosquitoes were then transported to the laboratory for analysis.

Laboratory processing of mosquito samples

The morphological identification of Anopheles mosquitoes was done using the "LEICA ZOOM 2000" binocular magnifier at the magnitude of 40X, based on morphological criteria following the identification keys of Gillies and De Meillon [19] and Gillies and Coetzee [20]. Female Anopheles mosquitoes were sorted in Eppendorf tubes and transported to the medical entomology laboratory of CeRMI (Centre de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses -Christophe Mérieux) for subsequent analyses. The females Anopheles were dissected in to Abdomens (Abd) and Heads/thoraces (H/T). Each part of Anopheles mosquito were submitted processed for detection of oocyst (Abd) and sporozoites (H/T) as previously described [21]. All samples were stored at −20 °C.

Molecular characterisation of mosquito and Plasmodium infection detection

The DNA of heads/thorax and abdomens of all female Anopheles were extracted separately using the LIVAK method adapted for mosquito DNA extraction as previously described by Livak et al. [22].

Identification of species of the An. gambiae complex and the An. funestus group

The An. gambiae complex and the An. funestus group were discriminated by PCR using the abdomens part of each mosquito. For An. gambiae s.l., primers targeting SINE200 insertion (Short Interspersed Elements) was used to distinguish An. gambiae s.s. from An. coluzzii and An. arabiensis [23]. Primers targeting ITS2 region (Second Internal Transcribed Spacer Region) of nuclear ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA) was used to produce of varying band sizes to distinguish members of the An. funestus group [24]. The amplification reactions of SINE200 fragments was carried out in the total volume of 15 µL including 1.5 µL of PCR buffer 10x, 0.75 µL of 25 mM MgCl2, 0.12 µL of 10 mM dNTPs, 0.51 µL of 10 µM SINE_Foward and 0.51 µL of 10 µM SINE_Reverse primers, 0.12 µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase 5U/µL, 10.49 µL of sigma free water and 1 µL DNA. The PCR device used for amplification was the thermocycler (Master X50a Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) and the amplification included: denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s denaturation at 95 °C, 1 min annealing at 54 °C, 1 min extension at 72 °C, a final step of 10 min at 72 °C. For the ITS2 fragment, the PCR mix of 14 µL included 1.5 µL of PCR buffer 10x, 0.9 µL of 25 mM MgCl2, 0.12 µL of 10 mM dNTPs, 0.51 µL of 10 µM ITS2A, 0.51 µL of 10 µM ITS2B 0.51 µL of 10 µM FUN, 0.51 µL of 10 µM RIV, 0.51 µL of 10 µM PAR, 0.51 µL of 10 µM RIVLIK, 0.51 µL of 10 µM LEES, 0.51 µL of 10 µM VAN reverse primers, 0.12 µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase 5U/µL, and 7.28 µL of sigma free water. A volume of 1 μL of extracted DNA for each sample, was added in to the master mix, and the amplification carried out using the following conditions: initial denaturation for 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s denaturation at 95 °C, 1 min annealing at 50 °C, 1 min extension at 72 °C, final step of 10 min at 72 °C and a hold at 10 °C. After amplification, 6 μL of the PCR reaction was mixed with 4 μL of syber green and electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel (2 g agarose in 100 ml of 89 mM Tris, 89 mM Boric acid, 2 mM EDTA), at a constant voltage of 80 V for 50 min. Both strands of the amplified fragments (SINE200 and ITS2) were visualized on the GelDoc™ EZ Imager (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The details of primers targeting SINE200 and ITS2 of An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus group are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers using in molecular identification of An. gambiae s.l. in Plasmodium infection
Full size table

Detection of Plasmodium sporozoites and oocysts in Anopheles mosquitoes

TaqMan assay

The protocol described by Bass C, Nikou D, Blagborough AM and al. [25] was used for genus-specific amplification targeting the 18S rRNA genes of Plasmodium [25] through detecting the sporozoites in the salivary glands (heads/thorax) and the oocysts in the abdomens of female Anopheles. The PCR mix was carried out in a reaction volume of 10 µL comprising 1 µl of matrix DNA, 5 µL (1 µM) of SensiMix II Probe (1.25 ml), 0.8 µl (10 mM) of sense primers (PlasF: forward primer), 0.8 µl (10 mM) of antisense primers (PlasR: reverse primer), 0.3 µL of Falci + , 0.2 µL of OVM + and 1.9 µL of water. The amplification was carried out in the Light Cycler 480 real-time PCR system (Roche, SN: 20,726) using the following conditions: a pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 92 °C and 1 min at 60 °C.

The probe Falcip + was labelled with 6-FAM for the detection of P. falciparum and the probe OVM+ was labelled with HEX for the detection of Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale or Plasmodium vivax and primers, Plas_Foward and Plas_Reverse were used together with two probes tagged with fluorophores FAM and HEX. Known positive samples of P. falciparum and other Plasmodium species were used as positive controls and sterile water as negative control. All positive samples were subjected to 18 s Nested-PCR to confirm and discriminate Plasmodium species detected by TaqMan using the previously described protocol by Boonma P, Christensen PR, Suwanarusk R, Price RN, Russell R and Lek-Uthai U [26], with slight modification (use of Dream Taq instead of Taq polymerase) Nkemngo et al.[27]. The details of primers and probes are presented in the Table 1.

Nested-PCR

Amplification targeting the 18S rRNA genes of Plasmodium was performed in two steps. The first PCR reaction was to amplify the portion of all Plasmodium genus in the 20 μl of total volume (12.5 µL of distilled water, 2.5 µL of PCR buffer X10, 1.25 µL of 25 mM MgCl2, 0.5 µL of dNTPs 10 nM, 0.5 µL of 10 µM rPLU5 forward, 0.5 µL of 10 µM rPLU6 reverse primers, 2 µL of genomic DNA and 0.25 µL of 5U/µL Dream Taq DNA polymerase. The amplification included: denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 4 min and the hold at 4 °C. The second PCR reaction was for the speciation of the malaria parasite using the product of first PCR reaction as template and the primers designed to amplify the specific sequences of P. falciparum (rFAL1/rFL2), P. ovale (rOVA1/rOVA2), P. malariae (rMAL1/rMAL2) and P. vivax (rVAV1/rVAV2) as presented in the Table 1. For this second PCR reaction, 1 μL of the product of the first PCR was added in 19 μL of master mix prepared as described above and amplified using the thermocycler (Master X50a Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany under the same cycling conditions as described for the first PCR reaction, with the exception that the annealing temperature was 58 °C. Details of the primers used are provided in the Table 1.

Data analysis

Data was entered using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA) version 2016. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad_Prism_6.01 software version 22.1 (SPSS, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and processed by the Contingency statistical test. The prevalence of Plasmodium spp. infections in the Anopheles population was determined as the proportion of female Anopheles identified as positive for the presence of Plasmodium (either for all Plasmodium parasite species or for an individual species) at each site of study. Fisher exact test was used for the comparison of proportion in case of very low samples size for some groups (n < 5), while Chi-square test was used for the comparison of proportion between groups with sample size higher than 4 (n ≥). The significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Entomological indexes of malaria transmission included in this study are man biting Rate (ma), Infection Rate (s), Entomological Inoculation Rate (EIR).

Man biting rate (ma): Also called aggressive density is the product of anopheline density in contact with humans (m) and the anthropophily rate (a). It is calculated by dividing the total number of engorged females (F) of a species captured by the total number of people (W) who spent the night in the rooms where the captures took place. The Aggression Rate is expressed as the number of Anopheles mosquito bites per man per night.

$$ma=F\div W$$

Plasmodium infection rate (s) is the proportion of mosquitoes infected or carrying sporozoites in their salivary glands. This index is expressed as a percentage (number of infected mosquitoes out of the number of mosquitoes examined times hundred).

$$s=\frac{Number\,\,of\,\,mosquitoes\,positive}{Number\,\,of\,\,mosquitoes\,tested} X 100$$

Entomological inoculation rate (EIR) is the number of infective bites from Anopheles during a given period of time. It is expressed by infective bites per man per night/day/week/month or per year.

$$EIR=ma\times s$$

Ethical considerations

This study received ethical approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Fondation Congolaise pour la Recherches Médicales (No. 013/CIE/FCRM/2018), administrative authorizations from Université Marien Ngouabi (UMNG) (No. 247/UMNG. FST.DFD.FD-SBIO) and each local authority of the study areas. An informed consent was signed by the head of each household, before any indoor household mosquito capture. Each household head was free to withdraw from the study at any time without any justification.

Results

Mosquito composition in the study sites

Out of 699 Anopheles mosquitoes captured in this study, An. gambiae s.l. (90.7%; 634/699) was the predominant species followed by An. funestus s.l. (6.9%; 48/699), and An. moucheti (2.4%; 17/699). The distribution of these mosquito species was similar in rural (90.5% An. gambiae s.l., 6.9% An. funestus s.l., and 2.6% An. moucheti) and urban (92.0% An. gambiae s.l., 6.9% An. funestus s.l., and 1.1% An. moucheti) setting (Table 1). Anopheles gambiae s.l. was significantly (p < 0.0001) more abundant in dry season (95.6%; 301/315) compared to the rainy season (86.7%; 333/384), while it was the contrary for the distribution of An. funestus s.l. (10.7% in rainy vs 2.2% in dry seasons; p < 0.0001). The abundance of An. moucheti was similar, with 2.6% in rainy season and 2.2% in dry season (p = 0.8095). The molecular analysis of the 634 females of the Gambiae complex showed that An. gambiae s.s. was the predominant species (78.9%), followed by An. coluzzii (15.4%) and An. arabiensis (5.7%) (Table 2). The distribution of these species was similar among the seasons, while An. gambiae s.s. and An. coluzzii were predominant in urban (92.5%) and rural (17.3%) areas, respectively, compared to their counterparts (76.9% An. gambiae s.s. in rural; 2.5% An. coluzzii in urban). The molecular characterization of 48 specimens of funestus group showed only the presence of An. funestus s.s. (100%).

Table 2 Distribution of the Anopheles species/species complex (A) and the An. gambiae s.l. sibling species with respect to the study areas and the seasons
Full size table

Infection rate of Plasmodium spp. in abdomens and heads/thorax within the Anopheline family

Out of the 699 Anopheles mosquitoes captured in this study, the Plasmodium species infection rate was higher in abdomens (29.0%; 203/699) compared to the heads/thorax (22.3% (156/699), when using TaqMan diagnostic technic (Fig. 2A). Overall, it emerges that of the 699 infected Anopheles mosquito abdomens, 19.2% (134/699) were found to be infected with P. falciparum, 1.3% (9/699) for infection with OVM + (P. malariae, P. ovale or P. vivax) and 8.6% (60/699) for mixed infection (P. falciparum with non-falciparum species: P. malariae, P. ovale or P. vivax). Moreover, of the 699 heads/thoraxes positive by TaqMan, 18.7% (131/699) were infected with P. falciparum, 2.4% (17/699) for OVM + and 1.1% (8/156) for mixed infection (Fig. 3). In the 203 abdomens and 156 heads/thorax infected by Plasmodium species using TaqMan method, only 84,2% (171/203) abdomens and 77.6% (121/156) were confirmed and discriminated in nested-PCR (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Proportion of the infection rate in abdomens and heaads/thorax: a by TaqMan assay and b by Nested-PCR

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Detection of infection rate of the Plasmodium spp in Abdomens and Heads/Thorax of Anopheles by TaqMan assay

Full size image

Plasmodium species in mono-infection identified in infected oocysts (abdomens) were predominated for P. falciparum 51.7% (105/203), following by P. ovale 2.0% (4/203) and P. malariae 1.5% (3/203). The co-infection in the oocysts (abdomens) were 17.3%, 6.4% and 1.0% for P. falciparum/P. malariae, P. falciparum/P. ovale and P. malariae/P. ovale co-infection, respectively. The triple infection (P. falciparum/P. malariae/P. ovale) oocysts infected Anopheles mosquitoes was at 3.6%. The identification of the sporozoite (heads/thorax) of Plasmodium species in the infecting mosquitoes showed that P. falciparum (66.0%) was the predominant transmitted parasites species, followed by P. malariae (10.9%) and P. ovale (6.4%). The prevalence of the sporozoite mono-infection by the three species (Table 2) was 62.2% (P. falciparum), 7.1% (P. malariae) and 3.2% for P. ovale, respectively. The overall prevalence of Plasmodium sporozoite co-infected mosquitoes was 1.0% (8/699), including 0.4% (3/699) (P. falciparum/P. malariae), and 0.3% (2/699) (for P. falciparum/P. ovale or P. malariae/ P. ovale). The triple (P. falciparum/ P. malariae/ P. ovale) sporozoite infected mosquitoes was 0.1% (1/699) (Table 3).

Table 3 Infection rate of Plasmodium species in abdomen and heads/thorax of Anopheles
Full size table

Infection rate of Plasmodium spp. according to the Anopheles species

The distribution of the infection rate of oocyst and sporozoite of Plasmodium species was determined according to the Anopheles complex/groups (An. gambiae s.l., An. funestus and An. moucheti) and Gambiae complex (An. gambiae s.s., An. coluzzii and An. arabiensis) identified in this study (Fig. 4). Overall, regardless the type of infection (mono or co-infection), the sporozoites of all the Plasmodium species were detected in all the Anopheles species.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Prevalence of Plasmodium species infection in abdomens and Heads/thorax according to the Anopheles groups (A, C) and the Anopheles gambiae complex (B, D)

Full size image

The overall infection rate of Plasmodium spp oocyst was predominant in An. gambiae s.l. (25.6%) followed by An. moucheti (17.6%) and An. funestus (12.5%). However, the reverse trend was observed with Plasmodium spp sporozoite infection, with An. funestus showing the higher prevalence (25.0%), followed by An. moucheti (23.5%) and then An. gambiae s.l. (16.6%). The prevalence of P. falciparum mono-infection in Anopheles was higher in both part: Abdomens (An. gambiae s.l.: 16.7%; An. funestus: 8.3% and An. moucheti: 5.9%) (Fig. 4A) and heads/thorax (An. gambiae s.l.: 17.2%; An. funestus: 16.7% and An. moucheti: 17.6%) (Fig. 5C) the mosquitoes. The rate of P. malariae and P. ovale sporozoite mono-infection was similar and higher in An. funestus (2.1% P. malariae and 2.1% P ovale) compared to An. gambiae (1.6% P. malariae and 0.6% P. ovale) and An. moucheti (0.0% P. malariae and 0.0% P. ovale). All types of sporozoite Plasmodium spp co-infection was found in An. gambiae (0.3% P. falciparum/ P. malariae; and 0.2% P. falciparum/ P. ovale and 0.2% P. malariae/ P. ovale), while only P. falciparum co-infection with either P. malariae or P. ovale was found in An. funestus with the same proportion (2.1%). A unique and high prevalence of P. malariae/ P. ovale (5.9%) sporozoite co-infection was detected in An. moucheti. The triple P. falciparum/ P. malariae/ P. ovale sporozoite infection was only detected in An. gambiae s.l. (0.2%).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Prevalence of Plasmodium spp. infection in Anopheles species according to the study site (A, C) and the seasonality (B, D)

Full size image

Among the An. gambiae s.l., the overall prevalence of Plasmodium spp oocyst was predominant in An. gambiae s.s. (26.4%), followed by An. coluzzii (25.5%) and An. arabiensis (13.9%). However, the contrary was observed with Plasmodium spp sporozoite infection, where An. coluzzii (20.4%) had the higher rate of infection, followed by An. gambiae ss (16.0%) and then An. arabiensis (13.9%). The prevalence of Plasmodium spp mono-infection in Anopheles gambiae complex was predominated by P. falciparum both in abdomens (Fig. 4B) and heads/thorax (Fig. 4D), with An. coluzzii (abdomens: 19.4%; and heads/thorax: 15.3%) having the higher rate of infection compared to An. gambiae s.s. (abdomens: 15.8%; and heads/thorax: 13.4%) and An. arabiensis (abdomens: 5.6%; and heads/thorax: 11.1%). When both P. malariae and P. ovale sporozoite mono-infection were detected in An. gambiae s.s. (1.6% and 0.6%, respectively), only An. coluzzii and An. arabiensis were positive for only P. malariae (2.0%) and P. ovale (2.8%) sporozoite mono-infection respectively. The sporozoite co-infection with P. malariae/ P. falciparum (0.4%) was only detected in An. gambiae s.s., while An. coluzzii showed similar prevalence of sporozoite co-infection with ovale/P. falciparum (1.0%) and P. ovale/ P. malariae (1.0%). No mixed sporozoite infection was detected in An. arabiensis. The prevalence of triple P. falciparum/ P. malariae/ P. ovale sporozoite infection was 1.0% and detected in An. coluzzii.

Prevalence of Plasmodium spp. infection in Anopheles species according to the study site and the season

The rate of oocyst and sporozoite for Plasmodium species was determine according two ecological parameter including the municipally (Fig. 5A and C) and the season (Fig. 5B and D) in this study. Plasmodium falciparum infection was predominant in both abdomens and heads/thorax for all the study sites. The overall sporozoite infection rate of Plasmodium species was significantly higher in urban area (26.4%) compared to the rural area (16.0%) (p = 0.0162), although the total rate of oocyst infection was almost similar in rural (24.5%) and urban areas (24.1%). Only P. falciparum mono-infection (abdomens: 23.0%; heads/thorax: 25.3%) and dual P. falciparum/ P. malariae infection (abdomens: 1.1%; heads/thorax: 1.1%) were found in urban area. However, all the type of infection with P. falciparum, P. malariae and P. ovale were detected in rural setting with the predominance of sporozoite mono-infection of P. falciparum (12.3%), followed by P. malariae (1.8%) and P. ovale (0.8%).

The distribution of the Plasmodium spp infection with respect to the season (Fig. 5B and D) showed that, the overall prevalence of Plasmodium spp infection was significantly (p = 0.0009) higher during dry season compared to the rainy season for both in abdomens (dry: 27.3%; rainy: 22.1%) and heads/thorax (dry: 22.5%; rainy: 13.0%) of the mosquitoes. The rate of P. falciparum sporozoite mono-infection was predominant during raining and dry seasons (Fig. 5D), with a significant higher prevalence observed during the dry season (18.7%) compared to the rainy season (9.9%) (p = 0.0008). The same trend was observed with the prevalence of P. ovale sporozoite mono-infection (dry: 1.0% vs raining season: 0.5%), while the rate of P. malariae sporozoite mono-infection (1.6%) did not change with season. The prevalence of sporozoite co-infection with P. falciparum/ P. malariae during rainy season (0.5%) was higher than that observed during the dry season (0.3%). However, 0.3% of Anopheles had P. ovale sporozoite co-infection with either P. falciparum or P. malariae during both raining and dry seasons. The P. falciparum/ P. malariae/ P. ovale triple-infection was 0.3% during dry season.

Entomological index of malaria transmission

Some entomological parameters were determined to assess the transmission of malaria in rural and urban areas. The results of the entomological index according to the study site and seasonality are reported in Table 3. The Anopheles man biting rate (ma) in the household of in Goma Tsé-Tsé district (rural area) was 0.84 bites/night (b/n), compared to 0.36 b/n obtained in the household from Madibou (urban) district. However, overall entomological inoculation rate (EIR) was 0.13 ib/p/n or 47.5 ib/p/y in the study setting. The EIR was 0.17 ib/p/n or 62.1 ib/p/year in rural area compared to 0.092 ib/p/n or 33.6 ib/p/y in urban area. This index was 0.18 ib/p/n during the dry season compared to 0.14 ib/p/n during the rainy season, and ma in the household remained constant during the raining (0.69) and dry (0.72) seasons. The ma of An. gambiae s.l. decreased when moving from rural (0.77 b/n) to urban area (0.34 b/n), while the contrary was observed with the EIR (rural: 0.15 ib/p/n vs 0.34 ib/p/n) of this species. However, the two parameters (ma and EIR) of An. funestus s.l. and An. moucheti were higher in rural area compared to the urban area as shown in Table 3. In addition, ma and EIR of An. funestus s.l. and An. moucheti were higher in raining season compared to dry season while no change in terms of ma and EIR was observed with season for An. gambiae s.l.

Discussion

The present study aimed to determine the entomological indicators of Plasmodium spp transmission in Goma Tsé-Tsé and Madibou districts in the Republic of Congo. The entomological monitoring carried out revealed that An. gambiae s.l. was the major species in Goma Tsé-Tsé and Madibou districts, since it represents more than 90% of the total Anopheline caught in this study. The dominance of this species could be explained by its status as the main vector in the transmission of malaria in the Republic of Congo. These results are in line with previous studies in Cameroon [28, 29], in DRC [30] and in Gabon [31], that also reported the An. gambiae s.l. as the major group of Anopheles [2].

Anopheles funestus s.l. and An. moucheti were the other malaria vector identified in this study, but at the lower proportions. This study further confirms the presence of An. funestus and An. moucheti in Goma Tsé-Tsé district [18, 32], and reports for the first time the presence of these two species in a urban area in the Madibou district located at the southern part of Brazzaville. Like previous observation in southern areas of Cameroon [28], the proportion of caught An. gambiae s.l. was higher during the dry season compared to the wet season. However, the reverse distribution was observed with An. funestus s.l. between the two seasons. It is well known that Sahelian anopheline populations are seasonal, peaking in the rainy season [33, 34], as it was observed here with An. funestus s.l.. The presence of a dry-season population of An. gambiae s.l. in this study reflects and responds to the presence of enduring larval habitat in the two localities. In fact, the sites where the study was carried out are characterized by the presence of neglected ponds and the culture gardening that contribute to the development of mosquitoes during dry season.

Molecular analyses showed that An. gambiae s.s. was the major species of the An. gambiae complex, followed by An. coluzzii, and An. arabiensis. These findings are in line with previous reports showing that An. gambiae ss is the predominant species within the An. gambiae complex in Central Africa [28, 35, 36]. The same species were also recently identified in western Burkina Faso [33], but with An. arabiensis being the major malaria vector.

In this study, An. gambiae s.s. was highly prevalent in urban area compared to the rural areas, while the contrary was observed with An. coluzzii between the two areas. The abundance of An. gambiae s.s. in Madibou district, which is the urban areas might be justify by the presence of active gardening cultures and the Djoué river bordering the area. The same observation was done in Benin. This is in line with previous studies conducted in Senegal which reported the abundance of An. gambiae s.s. in the locality bordered by Gambia River and where agriculture is active [37].

Out of the 699 Anopheles mosquitoes captured in this study, the Plasmodium spp infection rate was higher in abdomens compared to the heads/thorax compartment. This disparity is in line with that reported by previous studies [27, 38], suggesting the likely effect of mosquito immune response against the parasite development from the oocyst (abdomen) to the sporozoite (heads/thorax) stages [39, 40]. The mono-infection rate of P. falciparum, P. malariae and P. ovale was higher in heads/thorax compared to abdomens compartments. This could be explained by the competition between the different Plasmodium parasites by eliminating others when the parasite density of the latter is low in order to migrate towards the salivary gland of Anopheles mosquitoes [41]. The overall infection rate of Plasmodium spp sporozoite in the field-caught Anopheles was 77.6%, with P. falciparum being the predominant parasites species, followed by P. malariae and P. ovale. This trend supports the findings from a previous epidemiological study conducted during the same period in the same locality [13], confirming the local transmission of these malaria parasite in human population. The results obtained this study can be explained by the fact that P. falciparum is the predominant malaria parasite in the Republic of Congo, although control and elimination efforts should not ignore P. malariae and P. ovale, present in low infection rate [13]. These three Plasmodium species were also identified in malaria vectors in the centre region of Ivory Coast [42]. Previous study in Cameroon and Gabon also identified P. falciparum in malaria vectors, but did not specify the non-falciparum species due to the limitations of technic used [27, 43].

Among the Anopheles vectors, the infection rate of Plasmodium spp sporozoite was predominant in An. funestus s.l., followed by An. moucheti, and then An. gambiae s.l. This result does not directly imply that An. funestus and An. moucheti are the major malaria vectors in these localities, since these two species represented less than 10% of the total field-caught Anopheles. The high infection rate of Plasmodium spp observed in An. gambiae s.l., which was the major Anopheles species in this study confirm its first place in malaria transmission in central Africa [28,29,30,31]. These observations showed that most cases of malaria occurring in the studies sites are carried by An. gambiae s.s., but An. funestus is the most competent species in the malaria transmission although the latter has been captured in small numbers 6.9% (48/699). The vectorial capacity of An. funestus has been shown in several regions of Cameroon [44, 45], so far, where it has been reported, it can sustain very high levels of malaria transmission [21, 45]. However, the identification of An. funestus and An. moucheti like in others countries [3, 7, 43, 44], suggests a deep study of the diversity of malaria transmission vectors in southern of Brazzaville.

Plasmodium falciparum parasite sporozoite was detected in all field-caught malaria vector in this study. An gambiae s.l. was responsible of the transmission of all Plasmodium species either in mono or in mix-infection, since all Plasmodium species sporozoite were detected in this vector. Anopheles funestus was showed to be able to transmit P. falciparum either in mono or in co-infection with P. malariae or P. ovale. However, a high rate of P. malariae/ P. ovale sporozoite co-infection was only detected in An. moucheti. All these findings suggest that there is a likely genetic susceptibility to Plasmodium species infection, as well as a competitive parasite interaction in case of co-infection in the Anopheles species. The presence of Plasmodium species in Anopheles vectors showed the participation of those species in malaria transmission.

It is well known that seasonality and the endemic locality are main factors related to epidemiology [13] as well as the level of malaria transmission [13]. The infection rate of Plasmodium species was also assessed according two ecological parameter including study site and the seasonality in the present work. The overall infection rate of Plasmodium spp sporozoite as well as the entomological inoculation rate of malaria vectors were significantly higher in urban area compared to the rural area. These results are in contrast with the findings commonly reported, showing that the urbanization is associated with the decrease of malaria transmission level [7]. One of the reasons of the results observed in this study might be the diversity of the Plasmodium species circulating between the two areas. All types of mono and mixt-infection of Plasmodium species were found in rural area, while the urban area was characterized by the predominance of P. falciparum mono-infection and dual P. falciparum/ P. malariae infection. Thus, the competitive development of two parasite species within a single mosquito might contribute to the decrease of the rate of infection.

According to the seasonality, the overall sporozoite infection rate and the entomological inoculation rate of Anopheles were higher during dry season compared to the wet season. The same observations were done during an entomological study conducted in the southern area of Cameroon [28]. However, these results are in discordance with the previous reported malaria epidemiology situation in the same study areas in Republic of Congo [13], as well as seasonal malaria vector and transmission dynamics reported in western Burkina-Faso [33]. All these findings may suggest a change of mosquito’s behaviour vis-a-vis the inhabitants that might occur between the two seasons, and according to the endemic area concerned in sub-Saharan Africa. Meanwhile, the fact that transmission occurs both during the dry and wet seasons in this study might be indicative of a perennial pattern in the locality. Anopheles gambiae s.l. was the most aggressive species with a bite rate higher than the other vectors, and P. falciparum being the predominant species, in the two area and during the rainy dry season. This is not improbable and is in support of previous studies in central Africa [28,29,30]. The annual average entomological inoculation rate (47.5 ib/p/y) recorded in this study was one of the highest ever recorded in the Republic of Congo and should be associated to a high infection rate in humans populations living in those areas [13]. Indeed, Trape & Zoulani [32] reported that annual EIRs of 22.5 ib/p/y are regularly associated with a prevalence of Plasmodium spp in humans [13], stand the risk of getting a daily infective mosquito bite of 0.18 ib/p/n during the dry season and 0.14 ib/p/n during the rainy season. In the previous study reported in malaria epidemiology situation [13], showed the high prevalence of malaria in dry season. Although the average annual entomological inoculation recorded in this study was lower than that in Gabon, the former suggest a P. falciparum prevalence in humans [27, 43].

Conclusion

These findings highlight that malaria transmission remains high in rural and urban area in the south of Republic of Congo despite the ongoing control efforts, thereby indicating the need for more robust interventions. The vectors found in rural and urban setting mostly belong to the An. gambiae s.l. (An. gambiae, An. coluzzii, An. arabiensis), but with variable relative proportion from one locality to another.

Availability of data and materials

All data are fully available without restriction. Data are available from the FCRM Institutional Data Access. All request for Data should be addressed to the Executive Director of FCRM reachable by the following address Prof. Francine Ntoumi, Villa D6, Cité OMS-Djoué, Brazzaville, République du.

Abbreviations

CeRMI:

Centre de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses—Christoph Merieux

LBDEA:

Laboratoire de la Biodiversité et Ecologie Animales

FST:

Faculté des Sciences et Techniques

UMNG:

Université Marien Ngouabi

EIR:

Entomological Inoculation Rate

ib/p/n:

Infectious bites/person/night

ib/p/y:

Infectious bites/person/year

References

  1. WHO. World Malaria Report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2022.

  2. Fontenille D, Cohuet A, Awono-Ambene P, Antonio-Nkondjio C, Wondji C, Kengne P, et al. Systématique et biologie des anophèles vecteurs de Plasmodium en Afrique, données récentes. Med Trop (Mars). 2003;63:247–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Antonio-Nkondjio C, Kerah CH, Simard F, Awono-Ambene P, Chouaibou M, Tchuinkam T, et al. Complexity of the malaria vectorial system in Cameroon: contribution of secondary vectors to malaria transmission. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:1215–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keiser J, Utzinger J, de Castro M, Smith TA, Tanner M, Singer BH. Urbanization in sub-saharan Africa and implication for malaria control. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71:118–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hiwat H, Bretas G. Ecology of Anopheles darlingi Root with respect to vector importance: a review. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:177.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Amvongo-Adjia N, Wirsiy EL, Riveron JM, Ndongmo WPC, Enyong PA, Njiokou F, et al. Bionomics and vectorial role of anophelines in wetlands along the volcanic chain of Cameroon. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:471.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bigoga JD, Manga L, Titanji VPK, Coetzee M, Leke RFG. Malaria vectors and transmission dynamics in coastal south-western Cameroon. Malar J. 2007;6:5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Doumbe-Belisse P, Kopya E, Ngadjeu CS, Sonhafouo-Chiana N, Talipouo A, Djamouko-Djonkam L, et al. Urban malaria in sub-Saharan Africa: dynamic of the vectorial system and the entomological inoculation rate. Malar J. 2021;20:364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mouchet J, Carnevale P, Coosemans M, Julvez J, Manguin S, Richard-Lenoble D, et al. Biodiversité du paludisme dans le monde. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bayoh MN, Thomas CJ, Lindsay SW. Mapping distributions of chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae in West Africa using climate data. Med Vet Entomol. 2001;15:267–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ortiz DI, Piche-Ovares M, Romero-Vega LM, Wagman J, Troyo A. The impact of deforestation, urbanization, and changing land use patterns on the ecology of mosquito and tick-borne diseases in Central America. Insects. 2022;13:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Programme National Lutte contre Paludisme (PNLP). Rapport d'activités. Ministère de la santé et de la population, République du Congo (Congo-Brazzaville); 2020.

  13. Mbama Ntabi JD, Lissom A, Djontu JC, Diafouka-Kietela S, Vouvoungui C, Boumpoutou RK, et al. Prevalence of non-Plasmodium falciparum species in southern districts of Brazzaville in The Republic of the Congo. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsumori Y, Ndounga M, Sunahara T, Hayashida N, Inoue M, Nakazawa S, et al. Plasmodium falciparum: differential selection of drug resistance alleles in contiguous urban and peri-urban areas of Brazzaville. Republic of Congo PLoS One. 2011;6: e23430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adam JP. Répartition géographique des Anophèles en République du congo (Brazzaville). Office de la recherche scientifique et technique outre-mer. 1957.

  16. Carnevale P, Bosseno MF, Zoulani A, Miche LR, Molez JF. La dynamique de la transmission du paludisme humain en zone de savane herbeuse et de forêt dégradée des environs nord et sud de Brazzaville, R.P. du Congo. Cahiers Orstom, sér Ent Méd Parasitol 1985;95–115.

  17. Geography of the Republic of Congo [http://fr.getamap.net/about/republic_of_the_congo/geography.html]

  18. Nianga BGOT, Bitsindou P, Lenga A. Impact of the use of mosquito nets on malaria transmission in Djoumouna (Brazzaville-congo). Int J Adv Res. 2019;7:285–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gillies MT, De Meillon B. The Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Ethiopian zoogeographical region). Publ South Afr Inst Med Res. 1968.

  20. Gillies M, Coetzee M. A supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Afrotropical region). Publ South Afr Inst Med Res. 1987;55:1–143.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nkemngo FN, Mugenzi LMJ, Terence E, Niang A, Wondji MJ, Tchoupo M, et al. Multiple insecticide resistance and Plasmodium infection in the principal malaria vectors Anopheles funestus and Anopheles gambiae in a forested locality close to the Yaoundé airport. Cameroon Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Livak KJ. Organization and mapping of a sequence on the Drosophila melanogaster X and Y chromosomes that is transcribed during spermatogenesis. Genetics. 1984;107:611–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Santolamazza F, Mancini E, Simard F, Qi Y, Tu Z, della Torre A. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malar J. 2008;7:163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Koekemoer LL, Kamau L, Hunt RH, Coetzee M. A cocktail polymerase chain reaction assay to identify membersof the Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) group. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;6:804–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bass C, Nikou D, Blagborough AM, Vontas J, Sinden R, Williamson MS, et al. PCR-based detection of Plasmodium in Anopheles mosquitoes: a comparison of a new high-throughput assay with existing methods. Malar J. 2008;7:177.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Boonma P, Christensen PR, Suwanarusk R, Price RN, Russell R, Lek-Uthai U. Comparison of three molecular methods for the detection and speciation of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J. 2007;6:124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nkemngo FN, Mugenzi LMJ, Tchouakui M, Nguiffo-Nguete D, Wondji MJ, Mbakam B, et al. Xeno-monitoring of molecular drivers of artemisinin and partner drug resistance in P. falciparum populations in malaria vectors across Cameroon. Gene. 2022;821:146339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bigoga JD, Nanfack FM, Awono-Ambene PH, Patchoké S, Atangana J, Otia VS, et al. Seasonal prevalence of malaria vectors and entomological inoculation rates in the rubber cultivated area of Niete South Region of Cameroon. Parasit Vectors. 2015;5:197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Manga L, Bouchite B, Toto JC, Froment A. [Anopheles species and the transmission of malaria in the forest/savannah transition zone in central Cameroon] (in French). Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1997;90:128–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Matubi EM, Bukaka E, Luemba TB, Situakibanza H, Sangaré I, Mesia G, et al. Détermination des paramètres bioécologiques et entomologiques d’Anopheles gambiae s.l. dans la transmission du paludisme à Bandundu-ville, République Démocratique de Congo. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;22:108.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sylla EH, Kun JF, Kremsner PG. Mosquito distribution and entomological inoculation rates in three malaria-endemic areas in Gabon. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94:652–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Trape JF, Zoulani A. Malaria and urbanization in central Africa: the example of Brazzaville. Part II: Results of entomological surveys and epidemiological analysis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987;2:10–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Epopa PS, Collins CM, North A, Millogo AA, Benedict MQ, Tripet F, et al. Seasonal malaria vector and transmission dynamics in western Burkina Faso. Malar J. 2019;18:113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lehmann T, Dao A, Yaro AS, Diallo M, Timbiné S, Huestis DL, et al. Seasonal variation in spatial distributions of Anopheles gambiae in a Sahelian village: evidence for aestivation. J Med Entomol. 2014;51:27–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Atangana J, Fondjo E, Fomena A, Tamesse JL, Patchoké S, Ndjemaiuml HN, et al. Seasonal variations of malaria transmission in Western Cameroon highlands: entomological, parasitological and clinical investigations. J Cell and Animal Biol. 2009;3:33–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mourou JR, Coffinet T, Jarjaval F, Cotteaux C, Pradines E, Godefroy L, et al. Malaria transmission in Libreville: results of a one year survey. Malar J. 2012;11:40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Caputo B, Nwakanma D, Jawara M, Adiamoh M, Dia I, Konate L, et al. Anopheles gambiae complex along The Gambia river, with particular reference to the molecular forms of An. gambiae s.s. Malar J. 2008;7:182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Menze BD, Wondji MJ, Tchapga W, Tchoupo M, Riveron JM, Wondji CS. Bionomics and insecticides resistance profiling of malaria vectors at a selected site for experimental hut trials in central Cameroon. Malar J. 2018;17:317.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Clayton AM, Dong D, Dimopoulos G. The Anopheles innate immune system in the defense against malaria infection. J Innate Immun. 2014;6:169–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith RC, Barillas-Mury C. Plasmodium oocysts: overlooked targets of mosquito immunity. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32:979–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hume JC, Tunnicliff M, Ranford-Cartwright LC, Day KP. Susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi to tropical isolates of Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J. 2007;6:139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zoh DD, Yapi A, Adja MA, Guindo-Coulibaly N, Kpan DM, Sagna AB, et al. Role of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles coluzzii (Diptera: Culicidae) in human malaria transmission in rural areas of Bouaké, in Côte d’Ivoire. J Med Entomol. 2020;57:1254–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Boussougou-Sambe ST, Woldearegai TG, Doumba-Ndalembouly AG, Ngossanga B, Mba RB, et al. Assessment of malaria transmission intensity and insecticide resistance mechanisms in three rural areas of the Moyen Ogooué Province of Gabon. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Highlights on Anopheles nili and Anopheles moucheti, malaria vectors in Africa. In: Anopheles mosquitoes: new insights into malaria vectors. Manguin S (ed.). InTechOpen, 2013.

  45. Djamouko-Djonkam L, Nkahe DL, Kopya E, Talipouo A, Ngadjeu CS, Doumbe-Belisse P, et al. Implication of Anopheles funestus in malaria transmission in the city of Yaoundé. Cameroon Parasite. 2020;27:10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mr Aimé Mamboueni, Célestin Mayangui Coatch and Guillaume Massengo for their work as guides and trackers, which made it easier for us to enter the houses various where the mosquitoes were collected. We thank the population of Goma Tsé-Tsé and Madibou district who gave their informed consent for access to homes for the mosquito collection. We also thank Destin Tati, for logistic assistance.

Funding

This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) grant (DFG BO 2494/3–1) awarded to the CoMAL project consortium. AL and JCD are supported by the Fondation Merieux. This work also received support by the Central Africa Clinical Research Network, CANTAM (EDCTP-CSA2020NoE-3100) and and the Central Africa Humboldt Research Hub (HR-Coca) funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. The funders did not play a role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, as well as the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fondation Congolaise Pour La Recherche Médicale, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo

    Jacques Dollon Mbama Ntabi, Jean Claude Djontu, Steve Diafouka-Kietela, Jolivet Mayela, Georges Missontsa & Francine Ntoumi

  2. Faculté Des Sciences Et Techniques, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo

    Jacques Dollon Mbama Ntabi, Arsène Lenga & Francine Ntoumi

  3. Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Abel Lissom, Ayola Akim Adegnika, Steffen Borrmann & Francine Ntoumi

  4. Department of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, University of Bamenda, Bamenda, Cameroon

    Abel Lissom

  5. Department of Parasitology and Medical Entomology, Centre for Research in Infectious Diseases (CRID), Centre Region, Yaounde, Cameroon

    Francis N. Nkemngo & Cyrille Ndo

  6. Tropical Infectious Deseases Research Center (TIDRC), University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin

    Luc Djogbenou

  7. Department of Parasitology and Microbiology, Center for Research in Infectious Diseases (CRID), Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Cyrille Ndo

  8. Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK

    Charles Wondji

  9. Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroun

    Charles Wondji

  10. Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné, Lambaréné, Gabon

    Ayola Akim Adegnika

  11. German Center of Infection Research (DZIF), Tübingen, Germany

    Ayola Akim Adegnika & Steffen Borrmann

Authors
  1. Jacques Dollon Mbama Ntabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abel Lissom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jean Claude Djontu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francis N. Nkemngo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Steve Diafouka-Kietela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jolivet Mayela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Georges Missontsa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Luc Djogbenou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Cyrille Ndo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Charles Wondji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ayola Akim Adegnika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Arsène Lenga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Steffen Borrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Francine Ntoumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JDMN: Investigation, methodology, writing of original draft preparation, formal analysis, review and editing and data analysis. AL: Supervision, methodology, writing of original draft, review and editing. JCD: Methodology, review and editing and data analysis. FNN: Review and editing GM: Investigation and projet manager. JM: Investigation and projet manager. SDK: Investigation and projet manager CD: Review and editing. LD: Review and editing. AL: Review and editing. FN: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, visualization review and editing. CW: Conceptualization, review and editing. AAA: Conceptualization, review and editing. SB: Conceptualization, methodology, project administration, review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jacques Dollon Mbama Ntabi or Francine Ntoumi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study received ethical approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Fondation Congolaise pour la Recherche Medical No. 013/CIE/FCRM/2018, administrative authorizations from Marien Ngouabi University (No. 317/UMNG. FST. DFD.FD-SBIO) and and the administrative authorizations of the Goma Tsé-Tsé district sub-prefecture (N°002/MATDDUDP/DGTT/SG-02). Prior to the mosquito collection, a consent form was signed by the head of each household giving access to homes for the capture of mosquitoes. A questionnaire was administered before or after the agreement of participation of the head of household.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ntabi, J.D.M., Lissom, A., Djontu, J.C. et al. Entomological indicators of Plasmodium species transmission in Goma Tsé-Tsé and Madibou districts, in the Republic of Congo. Malar J 23, 21 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04823-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04823-9

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us