Skip to main content
Download PDF

Presence of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles gambiae and absence in other malaria vectors in Cove-Zagnanando-Ouinhi health zone in southern Benin, West Africa

Malaria Journal volume 23, Article number: 20 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Malaria remains a major public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Benin. The present study aims to evaluate the different Plasmodium species transmitted by malaria vectors in the communes of Cove, Zagnanado and Ouinhi, Southern Benin.

Methods

The study was conducted between December 2021 and October 2022 in 60 villages spread over the three study communes. Adult mosquitoes were collected from four houses in each village using human landing catches (HLCs). After morphological identification, a subsample of Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles funestus and Anopheles nili was analysed by PCR to test for their infection to the different Plasmodium species.

Results

Anopheles gambiae was collected at higher frequency in all the three study communes, representing 93.5% (95% CI 92.9–94) of all collected mosquitoes (n = 10,465). In total, five molecular species were found, An. gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) and Anopheles coluzzii of the Gambiae complex, An. funestus and Anopheles leesoni of the Funestus group, and An. nili s.s., the sole species of the Nili group. From the five molecular species, four (An. gambiae s.s., An. coluzzii, An. funestus s.s. and An. nili s.s.) were found to be infected. Plasmodium falciparum was the main Plasmodium species in the study area, followed by Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium ovale. Only An. gambiae s.s. was infected with all three Plasmodium species, while An. coluzzii was infected with two species, P. falciparum and P. vivax.

Conclusions

Plasmodium falciparum was the only species tested for in malaria vectors in Benin, and remains the only one against which most control tools are directed. It is, therefore, necessary that particular attention be paid to secondary Plasmodium species for an efficient control of the disease. The presence of P. vivax emphasizes the need for an update of case management for malaria.

Background

Malaria is a disease caused by a pathogen transmitted to humans by female Anopheles mosquitoes. Despite the goal set by the World Health Organization (WHO) to reduce the global burden of malaria to 90% by 2030 [1], malaria-related morbidity and mortality has continued to increase over the past few years. For instance, the estimated number of global malaria-related deaths was 627,000 in 2020 compared to 558,000 in 2019.

In 2019, 229 million cases of malaria were recorded worldwide, 94% of which were in the WHO regions of Africa, and 7 out of 10 malaria-related deaths were in children under 5 years of age [2]. In Benin, 46.1% of the reasons for consultation and 40.8% of hospitalization cases are due to malaria and represent the main causes of morbidity and mortality recorded especially in children under 5 years of age [3].

Malaria remains one of the most important parasitic diseases. More than 70 species of Anopheles, of which 30 are found in sub-Saharan Africa, have been described as vectors of Plasmodium [4]. Five vectors are of primary importance in Africa, including Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus which are widely distributed, Anopheles moucheti and Anopheles nili which are predominantly found in forest regions, and Anopheles mascarensis which is present in savannah areas [5, 6].

The characterization of the species of parasites of the Plasmodium genus is an important step for an efficient control of malaria. A previous trial conducted in Benin showed that Plasmodium falciparum is transmitted by An. gambiae sensu lato (s.l.), An. funestus and An. nili [7, 8]. It is possible that other Plasmodium species may be found within these Anopheles vectors. In general, three methods are used for the identification of different Plasmodium species in different vectors. These are microscopic observation of sporozoites in dissected salivary glands [9], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of circumsporozoite protein (ELISA-CSP) [10] and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [11].

Previous studies in the Ouidah-Kpomassè-Tori Bossito health zone, Southern Benin, revealed the presence of coinfections of P. falciparum/Plasmodium malariae, P. falciparum/Plasmodium ovale and P. falciparum/P. malariae/P. ovale) in surveyed children using microscopy [12]. In mosquitoes, a recent trial performed throughout Benin using ELISA and PCR techniques on mosquitoes found in mosquitoes of the Gambiae complex infected with both P. falciparum and P. vivax [13] in some of the 24 surveyed communes. It is, therefore, necessary to better understand the transmission dynamics of the different Plasmodium species in the different Anopheles vector species of malaria in different parts of the country. The present study was designed to determine the Plasmodium species infecting An. gambiae s.l. and other vectors in Cove, Ouinhi, and Zangnanando, three communes in COZO district Health Zone.

Methods

Study site

The study took place in the communes of Cove, Zangnanado, and Ouinhi (Fig. 1) in the Zou department from December 2021 to January 2022. The Zou department covers an area of 5243 km2, and is bordered to the north by the Collines department, to the east by the Plateau department, to the south by the departments of Oueme and Atlantic, to the southwest by the Couffo department, and to the west by Togo. It is subdivided into nine communes namely Abomey, Agbangnizoun, Bohicon, Cove, Djidja, Ouinhi, Zangnanado, Zakpota and Zogbodomey. It is a plateau area with an altitude of 200 to 300 m. According to the fourth General Census of Population and Housing (RGPH 4) of May 2013, the department of Zou had 851,580 inhabitants. The vegetative growth period varies between 80 and 100 days. In Zou, there are two rainy seasons: (March–July and October–November) and two dry seasons (December–February and August); rainfall levels range from 1000 to 1400 mm [14].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map showing the Covè-Zangnanado-Ouinhi study area

Full size image

In 2021, the annual incidence rate of malaria was 50% in children aged 0 to 4 years [15] and the prevalence of malaria infection was 36.5% in children under 5 years [16]. The communes of Cove, Zangnanado and Ouinhi are about 150 km away from Cotonou. The area has 123 villages and a population of approximately 220,000 inhabitants. The activities practiced by the population are agriculture, fishing, hunting and trade.

Vector sampling

Mosquitoes were collected through human landing catches (HLC). In the three study communes, a total of 60 villages were randomly selected. In each village, four houses chosen at random were used for the capture of mosquitoes. Each seated collector used a flashlight as well as a sucking tube to collect the mosquitoes that landed on his/her exposed lower legs. In each house, a group of two collectors (1 indoor and 1 outdoor) worked from 19:00 to 01:00 (6 h) and the second from 01:00 to 07:00 (6 h).

Mosquito processing

Mosquito specimens collected were morphologically identified to species level using the taxonomic identification key of Gilles and Meillon [5]. A subsample of An. gambiae s.l., An. funestus and An. nili randomly selected both indoors and outdoors in each commune, were separated into two parts (head–thorax, and abdomen–legs–wings) and used for molecular analyses.

Plasmodium species identification by PCR

PCR was used to detect the presence of P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, or P. ovale in the Anopheles mosquitoes. DNA was extracted from the abdomen-legs-wings of each Anopheles mosquito specimen with CTAB (Cetyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide) at 2%. After 5 min in a water bath at 65 °C, the crushed material was mixed with 200 µL of chloroform and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was gently collected in another tube containing 200 µL of isopropanol, then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was gently collected in another tube containing 200 µL of isopropanol, then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. The resulting pellet was then purified with 200 µL of 70% ethanol. The whole mixture was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. The contents of the tube were gently inverted to preserve the pellet, which was then dried for at least 3 h on the bench. Finally, 20 µL of bi-distilled water was added to the pellet, which was left in suspension on the bench overnight or for half a day. The extracted DNA was analysed by PCR according to the protocol of Padley et al. [11]. The latter allowed the identification of specific nucleotide sequences of the different Plasmodium species in mosquitoes.

A mixed solution was prepared which included primers specific to the Plasmodium species. The specific primers used to identify the different Plasmodium species in An. gambiae, An. funestus and An. nili were:

  • Plasmodium (5′-AGTGTGTATCCAATCGAGTTTC-3′),

  • P. malariae (5′-GCCCTCCAATTGCCTTCTG-3′),

  • P. falciparum (5′-AGTTCCCCTAGAATAGTTACA-3′),

  • P. ovale (5′-GCATAAGGAATGCAAAGAACAG-3′),

  • P. vivax (5-AGGACTTCCAAGCCGAAGC-3′).

Positive controls consisted of P. falciparum, P. ovale and P. malariae DNA extracted from the blood of parasitized patients.

Amplified products for each reaction were separated using a 2% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The gel images were recorded and visualized on transilluminator EBOX 1000 (Vilber, Marne-la-Vallée, France).

Mosquito species identification through PCR

Mosquito species identification was performed on An. gambiae complex, An. nili group, and An. funestus group using the protocols of Santolamazza et al. [17], Kengne et al. [18], and Koekemoer et al. [19], respectively. However, the samples identified as Anopheles vectors were all tested to PCR following the protocol of Santolamazza et al., before being passed to the specific protocols for Anopheles vectors An. funestus and An. nili groups. This allows for the assessing of the involvement of each species of the An. gambiae complex and others species in the transmission of the different Plasmodium species.

Data management and analysis

All data collected during this study were double entered in an Excel Sheet. The infection rate for each of the Plasmodium species identified through PCR was calculated using the following formula: Number of positive mosquitoes/Total number of mosquitoes tested × 100. Data were analysed using R Core Team software (version 4.1.3-2022) and Graph Pad Prism software version 5.0. The graphs were made using Graph Pad software version 5.0. Their confidence intervals were calculated using the exact binomial test.

Results

Anopheles species composition

Table 1 presents the Anopheles species composition in the study area. In total, five different Anopheles complexes or groups (An. gambiae, An. funestus, An. nili, An. pharoensis and An. ziemanni) were identified. Anopheles gambiae s.l. was collected at higher frequency in all the three study communes, representing 93.5% (95% CI 92.9–94 for the total species composition) of all collected mosquitoes (n = 10,465) (Table 1). The other malaria vector complexes and groups were in very low proportions, ranging between 0.6% (CI = 0.4–0.8) and 3.8% (CI = 3.4–4.2).

Table 1 Anopheles species composition
Full size table

Figure 2 shows the molecular species identified in An. gambiae s.l., An. funestus s.l. and An. nili s.l. Of the 338 An. gambiae s.l. tested in the study area, An. gambiae s.s. [49.1% (166/338)] and An. coluzzii [50.9% (172/338)] were found in similar proportion. In the An. funestus group, An. funestus s.s. was in majority (97.2%; 106/109) followed by An. leesoni (2.8%; 3/109). All 64 samples of the An. nili group were An. nili s.s.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of molecular species within the An. gambiae complex, and the An. funestus and An. nili groups

Full size image

Infection rates to different Plasmodium species identified in the An. gambiae complex, and the An. funestus or An. nili groups

Combined data for all three Anopheles species, vector of malaria revealed mean infection rates of 8% (41/511), 3.3% (17/511), 0.4% (2/511) for P. falciparum, P. vivax, and P. ovale, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 Infection rate with P. falciparum, P. vivax and P. ovale infection rates in the surveyed communes
Full size table

Proportion of molecular species identified in An. gambiae s.l., An. funestus s.l. and An. nili s.l.

In An. gambiae s.l., infection with P. falciparum and P. vivax was observed in the three communes with an average of 9.2% (95% CI 6.4–12.9) and 5% (95% CI 3–8.1). However, infection with P. ovale was only observed in the commune of Zagnanado (0.6%; 95% CI 0.1–2.3). In An. funestus group, only P. falciparum was detected in two communes (Cove and Zagnanado) with a mean infection rate of 8.3% (CI = 4.1–15.5). Similarly in the An. nili group only P. falciparum was detected in one commune (Zagnanado) with a mean infection rate of 1.6% (95% CI 0.08–9.5) (Table 2). No P. malariae infection was observed in the tested samples. No mosquitoes were found coinfected with multiple Plasmodium species.

Distribution of Plasmodium species according to molecular species within the An. gambiae complex, and the An. funestus and An. nili groups

From the five molecular species identified within the three Anopheles complexes/groups, four forms (An. gambiae s.s., An. coluzzii, An. funestus s.s. and An. nili s.s.) were infected with P. falciparum. The rate of P. falciparum infection in An. nili s.s. was lower than other vectors species. Both An. gambiae s.s. and An. coluzzii were found infected with P. vivax. Only An. gambiae was found infected with P. ovale (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Infection rates of different Plasmodium species within the An. gambiae complex, and the An. funestus and An. nili groups

Full size image

Discussion

The present study evaluated the presence of the infection several Anopheles with different Plasmodium species vectors in the communes of Cove, Zangnanado and Ouinhi. Overall, P. falciparum, P ovale and P vivax were found in the study area. Plasmodium malariae was not detected in any of the mosquitoes tested.

Species of the An. gambiae complex were the predominant species in the study area. This finding is consistent with previous works conducted by Ngufor et al. [20], and Yovogan et al. [21]. Molecular species identification performed in An. gambiae s.l. revealed the presence of An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.s. in similar proportions. These results corroborate the work of Yovogan et al. [21]. The presence of An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.s. in the study area is thought to be due to the presence of temporary larval habitats created by rainfall, and permanent and semi-permanent larval habitats created by the numerous rice paddies, as well as the tributaries of the Oueme and Zou rivers. Larvae are not generally found in moving water. It can be assumed that they are found in river beds when the water recedes during the dry season.

Within the An. funestus group, PCR analysis showed the presence of An. funestus s.s. (97.2%), and An. leesoni (2.8%). Anopheles nili s.s. was the only species identified within the An. nili group. These results are similar to previous works performed in some regions of Benin [8, 22,23,24,25,26]. They showed that while P. falciparum infection was reported in all three Anopheles complexes, but only An. gambiae s.l. was found infected with P. vivax, and P. ovale. Overall, the highest infection rate of mosquitoes was observed with P. falciparum, followed by P. vivax (3.3%) and P. ovale (0.4%). These results are similar to those from the work conducted in Cotonou health zones by Poirier et al. [25], and in Benin by Osse et al. [13]. Detection of P. vivax infection had been reported in a large-scale study in asymptomatic subjects in Benin [13, 25]. This study was the first report of the infection of An. gambiae s.l. with P. ovale in the commune of Zagnanado. The absence of infection with P. vivax and P. ovale observed in the An. funestus and An. nili groups could be due to their low density in the study area.

Infection rates for P. vivax in vectors were high in this area, in contrast to previous work in the area according Osse et al. [13] who found 1.5% for one commune in Agbangnizoun in the same region versus 5% in our three study communes. This is likely due to the use of PCR on whole mosquitoes for identification of parasites within the mosquitoes. This would allow for detection of different Plasmodium life stages within the vectors while ELISA detects only sporozoites and is usually done only on the head and thorax to avoid detection of sporozoites in the abdomens. The results from this study complement those of Osse et al. [14] expanding the geographic range of detection of different Plasmodium species within mosquito vectors in Benin.

Contrary to the findings of Sandeu et al. [27] no co-infection with different Plasmodium species was recorded in Anopheles mosquitoes analysed in the study. In the last study, P. vivax was not found in any of the mosquito samples analysed by microscopy, contrary to the molecular findings of the present study. Indeed, Howes et al. [28] have previously shown that P. vivax is the most widespread malaria parasite, but it is rare in Africa. African populations do not express a majority of the Duffy blood group antigens, which was thought to be essential for P. vivax parasite to invade red blood cells. This parasite is less the focus of public health considerations in terms of diagnosis, treatment or surveillance. As more sensitive diagnostic methods become available, P. vivax in Africa is increasingly reported by various types of survey (entomological, serological, community prevalence), as well as clinical data on infections of local residents and internationals [13].

The methods used in this study are not comparable to ELISAs and likely overestimated the infection rates compared to ELISAs in part due to the inherent sensitivity of PCR but also because PCR may detect Plasmodium life stages other than sporozoites. The use of legs, wings and abdomens for parasite detection means that non-infective stages were likely picked up [29]. However, these detections do not necessarily mean that the mosquito will transmit the parasite and constitute a potential limitation in this study. Studies have also mentioned the difficulty of ELISA in detecting the antigens of other Plasmodium species such as P. malariae and P. ovale, as well as the problem of antigenic variation of the CSP antigen between geographical areas [30, 31]. While PCR may overestimate sporozoite infection by P. falciparum, ELISAs may underestimate or even fail to detect the presence of other Plasmodium species.

Only An. gambiae s.s. was found to be infected with the three Plasmodium species found in the study area. In An. coluzzii, infection was reported with P. falciparum and P. vivax. Highest infection rates were observed among An. gambiae followed by An. coluzzii, An. funestus s.s. and An. nili s.s. respectively. However, the methodology used limits the conclusion that An. gambiae is better than An. coluzzii in the area. The presence of P. vivax in An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.s. suggests that more detailed screening for all these vectors should be undertaken, as P. vivax is difficult to eliminate and more ultrasensitive methods are needed to detect infections in the community. Another limitation of this study is the non-sequencing of species in the An. funestus group to confirm the An. leesoni.

Though not yet reported from Benin, the invasive mosquito, Anopheles stephensi, is also a known vector of P. vivax and may facilitate transmission in Africa [32,33,34], particularly in urban settings.

Conclusion

This study identified the presence of P. vivax and P. ovale, in addition to P. falciparum which is widespread in Benin. Molecularly, An. gambiae s.s. and An. coluzzi of the Gambiae complex, An. funestus s.s., and An. leesoni of the Funestus group, and An. nili s.s. of the Nili group. Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax and P. ovale. were all observed to infect An. gambiae. Further studies are necessary to better understand the transmission dynamics of P. vivax in Benin.

Availability of data and materials

Data is contained within the article. The dataset used/or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. WHO‎. World malaria report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/200018.

  2. WHO. World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/337660.

  3. Ministère de la Santé du Bénin. Annuaire des Statistiques Sanitaires 2018 des Départements du Benin. Cotonou, Benin; 2019.

  4. Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Rubio-Palis Y, Chareonviriyaphap T, Coetzee M, et al. A global map of dominant malaria vectors. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillies MT, De Meillon B. The Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara. Publ S Afr Inst Med Res. 1968;54:1–343.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Antonio-Nkondjio C, Hinzoumbe Kerah C, Simard F, Awono-Ambene P, Chouaibou M, Tchuinkam T, et al. Complexity of the malaria vectorial system in Cameroon: contribution of secondary vectors to malaria transmission. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:1215–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Djouaka R, Riveron JM, Yessoufou A, Tchigossou G, Akoton R, Irving H, et al. Multiple insecticide resistance in an infected population of the malaria vector Anopheles funestus in Benin. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:453.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ossè R, Tokponnon F, Padonou GG, Sidick A, Aïkpon R, Fassinou A, et al. Involvement of Anopheles nili in Plasmodium falciparum transmission in North Benin. Malar J. 2019;18:152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenberg R, Maheswary NP. Forest malaria in Bangladesh. II. Transmission by Anopheles dirus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1982;31:183–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wirtz RA, Burkot TR, Graves PM, Andre RG. Field evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax sporozoites in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from Papua New Guinea. J Med Entomol. 1987;24:433–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Padley D, Moody AH, Chiodini PL, Saldanha J. Use of a rapid, single-round, multiplex PCR to detect malarial parasites and identify the species present. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2003;97:131–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Damien GB, Djènontin A, Rogier C, Corbel V, Bio Bangana S, Chandre F, et al. Malaria infection and disease in an area with pyrethroid-resistant vectors in southern Benin. Malar J. 2010;9:380.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ossè R, Tokponnon F, Padonou GG, Glitho ME, Sidick A, Fassinou A, et al. Evidence of transmission of Plasmodium vivax 210 and Plasmodium vivax 247 by Anopheles gambiae and An. coluzzii, major malaria vectors in Benin/West Africa. Insects. 2023;14:231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Institut National de la Statistique et de l’Analyse Economique (INSAE). Cahiers des villages et quartiers de ville du département du Zou, Recensement général de la population 2013–4. Cotonou, Bénin; 2016.

  15. Ministère de la santé du Bénin. Annuaire des Statistiques Sanitaires 2020 des Départements du Bénin. Cotonou, Bénin; 2021.

  16. Institut National de la Statistique et de l’Analyse Economique (INSAE) et ICF. Enquête Démographique et de Santé au Bénin, 2017–2018: Indicateurs Clés. Cotonou, Bénin; 2018.

  17. Santolamazza F, Mancini E, Simard F, Qi Y, Tu Z, della Torre A. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malar J. 2008;7:163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kengne P, Awono-Ambene P, Antonio-Nkondjio C, Simard F, Fontenille D. Molecular identification of the Anopheles nili group of African malaria vectors. Med Vet Entomol. 2003;17:67–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koekemoer LL, Kamau L, Hunt RH, Coetzee M. A cocktail polymerase chain reaction assay to identify members of the Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) group. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66:804–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ngufor C, N’Guessan R, Fagbohoun J, Subramaniam K, Odjo A, Fongnikin A, et al. Insecticide resistance profile of Anopheles gambiae from a phase II field station in Cové, southern Benin: implications for the evaluation of novel vector control products. Malar J. 2015;14:464.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yovogan B, Sovi A, Padonou G, Adoha C, Akinro B, Chitou S, et al. Pre-intervention characteristics of the mosquito species in Benin in preparation for a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of dual active-ingredient long-lasting insecticidal nets for controlling insecticide-resistant malaria vectors. PLoS ONE. 2021;16: e0251742.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Djènontin A, Bio-Bangana S, Moiroux N, Henry MC, Bousari O, Chabi J, et al. Culicidae diversity, malaria transmission and insecticide resistance alleles in malaria vectors in Ouidah-Kpomasse-Tori district from Benin (West Africa): a pre-intervention study. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tokponnon TF, Ossè R, Padonou GG, Affoukou CD, Sidick A, Sewade W, et al. Entomological characteristics of malaria transmission across Benin: an essential element for improved deployment of vector control interventions. Insects. 2023;14:52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Accrombessi M, Cook J, Dangbenon E, Yovogan B, Akpovi H, Sovi A, et al. Efficacy of pyriproxyfen-pyrethroid long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and chlorfenapyr-pyrethroid LLINs compared with pyrethroid-only LLINs for malaria control in Benin: a cluster-randomised, superiority trial. Lancet. 2023;401:435–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Poirier P, Doderer-Lang C, Atchade PS, Lemoine JP, Coquelin de l’Isle ML, Abou-bacar A, et al. The hide and seek of Plasmodium vivax in West Africa: report from a large-scale study in Beninese asymptomatic subjects. Malar J. 2016;15:570.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tokponnon F, Osse R, Egui JG, Houndjo G, Dabou ZS, Houessinon F, et al. Determination of plasmodial species prevalence among patients received at Cotonou Boni clinic during rainy season in the year 2022. Int J Trop Dis Health. 2023;44:9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sandeu MM, Moussiliou A, Moiroux N, Padonou GG, Massougbodji A, Corbel V, et al. Optimized pan-species and speciation duplex real-time PCR assays for Plasmodium parasites detection in malaria vectors. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e52719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Howes RE, Reiner RC Jr, Battle KE, Longbottom J, Mappin B, Ordanovich D, et al. Plasmodium vivax transmission in Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9: e0004222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hendershot L, Allison L, Esayas E, Sutcliffe A, Irish RS, Fitsum E, et al. Comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Collins K, Hochberg L, Ryan P, Collins W, Wirtz R, Ryan J. Quantification of Plasmodium malariae Infection in mosquito vectors. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2004;98:469–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bassene H, Kengne P, Ndiath MO, Sokhna C, Dupressoir T, Fontenille D, et al. Comparaison des méthodes de la PCR, d’ELISA-CSP et d’observation microscopique directe pour la détection des sporozoïtes de Plasmodium falciparum chez Anopheles gambiae au Sénégal. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2009;102:233–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ahmed A, Pignatelli P, Elaagip A, Abdel Hamid MM, Fateh Alrahman O, Weetman D. Invasive malaria vector Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes in Sudan, 2016–2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:2952–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Carter TE, Yared S, Gebresilassie A, Bonnell V, Damodaran L, Lopez K, et al. First detection of Anopheles stephensi Liston, 1901 (Diptera: Culicidae) in Ethiopia using molecular and morphological approaches. Acta Trop. 2018;188:180–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. WHO. Initiative to stop the spread of Anopheles stephensi in Africa. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Director of the Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou Dr (MC) Germain Gil Padonou for the contribution on this study. We thank the Project New Net teams for their hard work. We also thank the management of the Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou and its staff for field and laboratory work. We thank the field work whose was funded by a grant to the London School of Hygiene &Tropical Medicine from UNITAID and The Global Fund via the Innovative Vector Control Consortium.

Funding

The study was the fruit of local efforts by the Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine from UNITAID and the personal contributions of CREC researchers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou, Ministère de la Santé, Cotonou, Benin

    Tatchémè Filémon Tokponnon, Razaki Ossè, Boulais Yovogan, Ella Guidi, Constantin J. Adoha, André Sominanhouin, Juvenal Ahouandjinou, Aboubakar Sidick & Martin C. Akogbeto

  2. Ecole Polytechnique d’Abomey Calavi, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin

    Tatchémè Filémon Tokponnon & Ella Guidi

  3. Ecole de Gestion et d’Exploitation des Systèmes d’Elevage, Université Nationale d’Agriculture, Ketou, Benin

    Razaki Ossè

  4. Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université d’Abomey Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin

    Boulais Yovogan & Constantin J. Adoha

Authors
  1. Tatchémè Filémon Tokponnon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Razaki Ossè
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Boulais Yovogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ella Guidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Constantin J. Adoha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. André Sominanhouin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Juvenal Ahouandjinou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Aboubakar Sidick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Martin C. Akogbeto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: TFT, RO and MCA; data collection: TFT, BY EG, CJA, RO, JA, and AS; formal analysis: TFT, RO, AS, BY and EG; methodology: TFT, RO, AS; original draft preparation formal: TFT, RO, EG, BY; supervision: MA. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatchémè Filémon Tokponnon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participle

The protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the National Health Research Ethics Committee (No. 30/MS/DC/SGM/DRFMT/CNERS/SA, Approval no. 6 of 04/03/2019). Written consent to participate in the study was taken from the heads of households and adult volunteers who performed the HLCs after being fully informed of the risks of the study, if any. Mosquito collectors were trained to sample any mosquitoes that landed on their bare lower limbs before being bitten. All fieldworkers were vaccinated against yellow fever. When they showed symptoms of malaria, they were immediately taken care of at the nearest health facility.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tokponnon, T.F., Ossè, R., Yovogan, B. et al. Presence of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles gambiae and absence in other malaria vectors in Cove-Zagnanando-Ouinhi health zone in southern Benin, West Africa. Malar J 23, 20 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04834-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04834-6

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us