Skip to main content
Download PDF

Assessment of environmental and spatial factors influencing the establishment of Anopheles gambiae larval habitats in the malaria endemic province of Woleu-Ntem, northern Gabon

Malaria Journal volume 23, Article number: 158 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to assess the spatial distribution of Anopheles mosquito larval habitats and the environmental factors associated with them, as a prerequisite for the implementation of larviciding.

Methods

The study was conducted in December 2021, during the transition period between the end of the short rainy season (September–November) and the short dry season (December-February). Physical, biological, and land cover data were integrated with entomological observations to collect Anopheles larvae in three major towns: Mitzic, Oyem, and Bitam, using the "dipping" method during the transition from rainy to dry season. The collected larvae were then reared in a field laboratory established for the study period. After the Anopheles mosquitoes had emerged, their species were identified using appropriate morphological taxonomic keys. To determine the influence of environmental factors on the breeding of Anopheles mosquitoes, multiple-factor analysis (MFA) and a binomial generalized linear model were used.

Results

According to the study, only 33.1% out of the 284 larval habitats examined were found to be positive for Anopheles larvae, which were primarily identified as belonging to the Anopheles gambiae complex. The findings of the research suggested that the presence of An. gambiae complex larvae in larval habitats was associated with various significant factors such as higher urbanization, the size and type of the larval habitats (pools and puddles), co-occurrence with Culex and Aedes larvae, hot spots in ambient temperature, moderate rainfall, and land use patterns.

Conclusions

The results of this research mark the initiation of a focused vector control plan that aims to eradicate or lessen the larval habitats of An. gambiae mosquitoes in Gabon's Woleu Ntem province. This approach deals with the root causes of malaria transmission through larvae and is consistent with the World Health Organization's (WHO) worldwide objective to decrease malaria prevalence in regions where it is endemic.

Background

Despite significant progress over the past decade, including the introduction of new artemisinin-based anti-malarial drugs, the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), malaria remains a major threat to the health of people in sub-Saharan Africa. Children under the age of 5 account for more than 80% of the victims of this parasitic disease [1,2,3]. In Gabon, particularly in the northern forest region of Woleu Ntem Province, malaria remains one of the most commonly diagnosed parasitic diseases [4]. With the growing phenomenon of Anopheles resistance to insecticides [5, 6] and changes in feeding and biting behaviour undermining malaria control systems [7], the World Health Organization (WHO) is recommending additional measures that can have a direct impact on malaria control such as the rational management of Anopheles mosquito larval habitats. Larviciding programmes have received considerable attention in sub-Saharan Africa in recent years [8, 9]. Although some reports suggest that combining LLINs and IRS has a positive impact on the fight against malaria, it is important to note that there are also limitations to this approach. Those limitations are the need for a huge logistics (aerial application) in areas with extensive larval habitats and the lack of knowledge about the larval habitats of some specific Anopheles species and the geographical availability of larval habitats in specific areas [10, 11]. Effective implementation of these additional measures in a given environment requires the identification and characterization of Anopheles larval habitats as well as the determination of key ecological factors that influence their presence [12]. Landscape features such as topography and land cover/use play an important role in determining the distribution and microclimatic conditions of larval habitats, which in turn affect the distribution of adult Anopheles vectors. Human activities, such as road building, infrastructure development, deforestation and agricultural practices, can also affect habitat distribution and stability [13].

Remote sensing is a powerful tool for studying the larval habitats of mosquitoes, particularly those that transmit diseases such as malaria [14, 15]. Several studies have highlighted the increased effectiveness of integrating remote sensing into the control systems of these vector-borne diseases [16]. At the national level, this technology has enabled the identification of regions that are conducive to the formation of larval habitats, including wetlands, mangroves, swamps, rice fields and temporary water bodies [17, 18]. In addition, remote sensing tools are being used to monitor environmental changes that may influence the distribution of mosquito larval habitats [19,20,21,22], thereby facilitating the efficient allocation of resources by health authorities in their vector control efforts. Despite its recognized role in the fight against malaria, this approach remains under-utilized by Central African countries.

In Gabon, a country highly affected by malaria [23,24,25], particularly in the province of Woleu-Ntem [4], research on malaria parasite transmission, particularly the identification of Anopheles larval habitats, remains scant. In this context, entomological studies using remote sensing to identify factors favoring Anopheles mosquito presence could significantly advance targeted malaria control by eliminating surface waters conducive to mosquito proliferation. In addition, the threat posed by the recent introduction of Anopheles stephensi in the Horn of Africa [26,27,28,29] and its recent sightings in Nigeria and Ghana [28] warrants the need for extensive larval surveys that includes Aedes larval habitats that are known to be favourable sites for An. stephensi [30, 31]. The current entomological study in the three main towns of Woleu-Ntem Province was, therefore, designed to characterize the environmental and anthropogenic elements potentially associated with the presence of Anopheles larvae in breeding habitats.

Methods

Characteristics of the study area

A field study was carried out in the three main towns of Woleu Ntem Province during the transition period between the rainy and dry seasons, from 10 to 27 December 2021. Woleu-Ntem is one of the nine provinces of Gabon. Its capital town is Oyem, but other towns also form part of this province, such as Bitam, Minvoul, Mitzic and Médouneu. According to the 2013 census, this province had 155,000 inhabitants. A high proportion of the surface area of this province is covered by the equatorial forest. The present study was conducted in three major towns (Mitzic, Oyem and Bitam) of Woleu-Ntem (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Bitam is the capital of the Ntem department and is located at 2° 05′ 00″ north latitude and 11° 29′ 00″ east longitude. It is located 30 km from the Cameroonian border and not far from Equatorial Guinea. According to the 2013 population census, the town had 27, 923 inhabitants. It is covered by a tropical rainforest with an equatorial climate. The average monthly temperature and relative humidity are 26 °C and 98% respectively (https://www.historique-meteo.net/). The city of Oyem is the capital of the Woleu department, with a population of over 60000. It is located at latitude 1° 37′ 00″ north and longitude 11° 35′ 00″ east. In Gabon, the towns of Bitam and Oyem share borders with Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea. Trade with neighbouring countries such as Equatorial Guinea and Cameroon is common. The vegetation of Oyem is of rainforest type with an equatorial climate. The average monthly temperature and relative humidity are 31 °C and 63%, respectively. The town of Mitzic is the capital of the Okano Department and is 111.47 km from Oyem, the capital of Woleu Ntem. Geographically, it is located between latitude 0° 42′ 11″ north and longitude 11° 33′ 57″ east. According to the 2013 population census, the population of this town was estimated at 8755 inhabitants. The climate of this area is tropical savanna type. The rapidly growing population of Woleu Ntem is experiencing tremendous urban development (mainly the construction of roads, schools, hospitals, public facilities and increased commercial activities), which could potentially lead to an increase in the number and types of malaria vector habitats. However, the peri-urban and village forest ecosystems of this province are experiencing high levels of logging activity by forestry companies, which could distort the natural habitats, species diversity, distribution and aggressiveness of mosquitoes. In addition to the type of activities in the different areas of Woleu-Ntem, it was noted that the type of housing varied from urban (central town) with mostly cement block buildings and few wooden houses to rural (villages) with mostly wooden houses [4].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geolocation of prospection sites in Woleu-Ntem province

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of the study sites
Full size table

Mosquito larval habitat characterization

Larvae were collected from potential larval habitats in the three main towns of Woleu-Ntem, namely Mitzic, Oyem, and Bitam, for 17 consecutive days. The collection took place daily from 8:00 to 14:00 and a standard dipper, as described by MW Service [32], was used for this purpose. To ensure that we visited all areas of each town to search for potential larval habitats, this collection was conducted with the assistance of locals who are more familiar with the town. And each larval habitat was explored only once. After collecting the Anopheles larvae, they were taken back to the insectarium for rearing. When they emerged as adults, each Anopheles was identified by their physical characteristics using a standard dichotomous key [33, 34]. An aquatic habitat was considered positive if at least one Anopheles spp. larvae was found. Moreover, potential larval habitats were visually inspected in order to determine the different types of larval habitats. Categorical and quantitative variables were analysed to describe the type of larval habitat used by Anopheles. The study considered several categorical variables, including the presence or absence of Culex and Aedes mosquito larvae, pollution linked to organic decomposition, the artificial or natural aspect of the larval habitat, the presence or absence of green algae in the larval habitat, the longevity of the larval habitat (temporary or permanent), and the appearance of the larval habitat (puddle, rut, domestic container, basin, breeze block). For quantitative variables, the diameter and depth of the larval habitat and the distance from the larval habitat to the nearest house were measured. All Anopheles larval habitats were georeferenced.

Vegetation cover index and surface temperature

The study analysed vegetation dynamics by utilizing the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) obtained from MODIS TERRA MOD13Q1 V6.1 satellite imagery. The imagery is derived from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA-AVHRR) advanced high-resolution radiometer, with a spatial resolution of 250 m in December 2021. The syntheses, which were produced every 16 days, were downloaded from https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mod13q1v061/. The study utilized land surface temperature images obtained from the MODIS TERRA MOD21C3.061 sensor, available on the website https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mod21c3v061/ for December 2021. These images are synthesized every 8 days and have a spatial resolution of 1 km. The NDVI and land surface temperature images are at level 3, where they are already corrected and projected into the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) geographic coordinate system. For each site, the monthly and overall period averages were calculated and presented them as NDVI and temperature maps. Additionally, temperature data were edited to remove any outliers.

Precipitation and land use

The study used daily precipitation data with a spatial resolution of 0.05° (approximately 5 km) from the CHRIPS (Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data) programme, downloaded from https://www.chc.ucsb.edu/data/ chirps for December 2021. The study used daily precipitation data with a spatial resolution of 0.05° (approximately 5 km) from the CHRIPS (Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data) program, downloaded from https://www.chc.ucsb.edu/data/ chirps for December 2021. The data was resampled to the resolution of the NDVI data to improve correlation. The monthly accumulation data from three meteorological stations in Gabon, namely Libreville, Mvengué, and Port-Gentil, were used to calibrate the satellite precipitation data. These stations are the most well-supplied with data and the data was obtained from the Gabon Meteorological Directorate. The validation method was based on calculating the correlation coefficient between the two precipitation time series. This procedure was previously used by Arvor et al. [35] and Boussougou [36]. The correlation coefficients for the Libreville, Port-Gentil, and Mvengué stations are 0.87, 0.87, and 0.88, respectively, indicating a high compatibility between the two time series at each station. The Pearson correlation test was used to establish the significance of the obtained coefficients, with a confidence level set at 0.05 or 5%. The p-values obtained were equal to 2.2e-16, indicating that the correlations were statistically significant for all selected stations used for validation and as references.

The land use data was obtained by manually digitizing a high-resolution (10 cm) image acquired by drone over the main urban centres of the study area (Oyem, Bitam, and Mitzic) using QGIS software. This enabled the mapping of all structures, including the extraction of buildings, for the month of December 2021.

Statistical and geospatial analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.0.2 statistical software. First, a Multiple Factor Analysis was performed using the "FactoMineR" package, to describe the type of larval habitats used by Anopheles from a set of quantitative (diameter and depth of the larval habitat and the distance from the larval habitat to the nearest house) and qualitative variables (pollution linked to organic decomposition, artificial or natural aspect of the larval habitat, presence or absence of green algae in the larval habitat, longevity of the larval habitat, and the appearance of the larval habitat) collected for each larval habitat [37, 38]. To examine their effect on the occurrence of larvae in larval habitats, we specifically excluded the variables of the presence of Culex spp. larvae and Aedes spp. larvae from the MFA. The occurrence of Anopheles larvae in larval habitats was examined, along with different larval habitats characteristics. This was accomplished using the "stats" software package to conduct a generalized linear binomial model analysis [39]. The study analysed the presence/absence of Anopheles larvae in larval habitats as the response variable, and the presence/absence of Culex mosquito larvae and Aedes mosquito larvae, along with MFA dimensions 1 and 2, as explanatory variables. A forward stepwise model-selection procedure based on Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) [40] was used to obtain the most parsimonious models. Although models with a ΔAICC < 2 were retained [41], the model with the lowest AIC was considered the best fit model.

The Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform was used to collect time series of NDVI, temperature, and precipitation images during December 2021, with the aim of calculating monthly averages of surface temperatures and NDVI, as well as the total precipitation for the month. Subsequently, data processing was carried out using mapping software such as QGIS and ArcGIS to create maps and represent building density.

Results

Larval habitats characterization

In this study, 284 potential larval habitats were surveyed in the three main towns (Mitzic, Oyem and Bitam) of Woleu Ntem Province in Gabon. A total of 157 positive larval habitats were identified, showing great diversity in the values of physical and environmental variables. The town of Bitam (69%, 31/45) had a significantly high percentage of Anopheles-positive larval habitats, followed by the towns of Mitzic (27%, 44/166) and Oyem (26%, 19/73) [(Chi2 = 30.938, p-value < 0.0001) (Table 1)]. All mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles (1570 specimens) belonged to the Anopheles gambiae complex. Multifactorial analysis (MFA) selected the first two dimensions (Dim) using the broken stick model test (Fig. 3A) [42]. These two dimensions accounted for 26.8% of the total variance. Dimension 1 (14.9%) can be interpreted as the size of the larval habitat, characterized by the diameter and depth of the larval habitats (Fig. 2A, B). Dimension 2 (11.9%) can be interpreted as the physiognomy of the larval habitat, characterized by the varying water content of the Anopheles larval habitats. Furthermore, the MFA indicates an overlap between the larval habitats in the cities, with the confidence ellipse of Oyem encompassing those of Bitam and Mitzic (Fig. 2C). On the other hand, the MFA analysis enabled us to differentiate between larval habitat used by Anopheles (positive larval habitats) and those not used by Anopheles (negative larval habitats) (Fig. 2D). The distinction between anopheline-positive and anopheline-negative larval habitats was primarily observed along dimension 2, which refers to the size of the larval habitat, rather than dimension 1, which refers to the physical characteristics of the larval habitat (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Larval habitat characterization according to physical characteristics. Canonical weight of each variable on the principal dimension: the position of the character for qualitative variables (A) and the size of the arrow for quantitative variables (B) indicate the importance of the parameter. C and D MFA diagrams showing correlations between different localities, and between positive Anopheles larval habitats and physical characteristics

Full size image

Macro-environmental factors affecting the presence of Anopheles gambiae s.l larvae in larval habitats

Our ecological modeling approach identified the first two dimensions (Dim. 1 & Dim. 2), as well as the presence of Culex spp and Aedes spp larvae, as essential factors in explaining the presence of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) larvae in the larval habitats. The GLM results show that the size of larval habitats, especially in medium-sized ones like puddles and ruts, significantly affects the occurrence of larvae from the An. gambiae complex (Figs. 2A and 3). This occurrence was also negatively correlated with the occurrence of larvae of other mosquito vectors, particularly Culex spp. and Aedes spp. [(with estimates of −0.37 and −0.18 respectively) (Fig. 3A)].

Fig. 3
figure 3

A Dimensions selected with the broken stick model. B Generalized linear model showing the effect of different larval habitats characteristics that favour Anopheles larval occurrence. Legend: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘’ 1; red colour: negative correlation; blue colour: positive correlation

Full size image

Geospatial analysis has indicated that temperature, rainfall, vegetation index, and building density have a significant impact on the occurrence of An. gambiae s.l. larvae within larval habitats. Specifically, the larval habitats for larvae were notably abundant in high-temperature areas of each town (Fig. 4A) in areas with light precipitation (Fig. 4B). In relation to land use, a medium value of NDVI associated with positive Anopheles larval habitats (Fig. 4C) characterized by a high density of buildings (Fig. 4D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

A Temperature, B Rainfall, C Vegetation index D Building index and Anopheles larval habitats presence: map visual inspection

Full size image

Discussion

This study aimed to identify and describe the larval habitats of Anopheles mosquito larvae in three major towns located in the forest of Northern of Woleu Ntem Province of Gabon. This study used weather and land cover data obtained through remote sensing to create models that to identify regions conducive to the formation of larval habitats. The research is based on the concept of larval source management (LSM), which involves the targeted management of mosquito larval habitats to reduce the population of mosquito larvae. This approach aims to control the spread of mosquito-borne diseases [43, 44]. In recent years, there has been a remarkable expansion of larviciding programmes in Africa, with the aim of eliminating malaria-carrying mosquitoes through ecologically sound methods [8, 9, 45]. However, the achievement of this technique, which supplements LLINs and IRS, will require accurate identification of the multiple larval habitats positive for Anopheles and the associated influencing factors. This study provides a basis for this approach in the three main towns of Woleu-Ntem Province, where malaria remains the leading cause of hospitalization [4].

The results shows an overall prevalence of Anopheles larval habitats of 33.1% for the three towns, with a significant predominance in Bitam, the least urbanized town in this study. This finding is consistent with what has been observed in numerous studies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), indicating that the level of urbanization has a negative impact on the number of Anopheles larval habitats [46]. This trend has already been explained by the characteristics of the urban environment, including multifactorial pollution, which makes surface waters less conducive to Anopheles aquatic life [47]. Nevertheless, it is important to note that an increasing number of studies conducted in urban contexts in SSA report the presence of Anopheles larvae belonging to the An. gambiae complex [48,49,50]. These larvae thrive in larval habitats that were once considered unsuitable for their development due to pollution [47, 51]. This observation might explain why all of the Anopheles larvae collected from the larval habitats during the study belong to the An. gambiae complex. Species within this complex are known for their remarkable phenotypic plasticity, which allows them to colonize a wide range of larval habitats, as observed in the present study [52, 53]. Satellite data analyses indicate that larval habitats of An. gambiae complex species are commonly found in heavily urbanized areas. This can be attributed to the rapid and uncontrolled urbanization in Sub-Saharan Africa, which is characterized by significant rural-to-urban migration, rapid population growth, and informal urban development with precarious installations and inadequate infrastructure [54, 55]. Consequently, rapid and uncontrolled urbanization in sub-Saharan Africa significantly impacts Anopheles larval habitats and malaria transmission by creating favourable breeding habitats, increasing the proximity of larval habitats to human dwellings, and potentially contributing to the adaptation of anopheline species to urban ecosystems [46].

Many researchers have investigated the factors that influence the colonization of larval habitats by Anopheles mosquitoes, with a particular focus on species within the An. gambiae complex [50, 53, 56]. The generalized linear model findings indicate that the presence of An. gambiae s.l. larvae in larval habitats is influenced by several factors. At the micro-environmental scale, our study has highlighted the strong association of species of An. gambiae complex for ruts and large pools of water. This association is consistent with observations from numerous entomological studies of mosquitoes in urban environments, which have emphasized that larger Anopheles breeding habitats, characterized by temporary or semi-temporary lifespans, are mainly associated with ruts and puddles [50, 53, 57]. This preference can be explained by the fact that larger breeding habitats provide more food resources and space for larval movement, thereby offering effective protection against predators such as larvivorous aquatic insects. Furthermore, ecological model highlights that the presence of larvae of certain mosquito species belonging to the subfamily Culicinae, such as Culex and Aedes, acts as a deterrent to the colonization of larval habitats by An. gambiae s.l. mosquitoes [58], although positive larval habitats for both Anophelinae and Culicinae were described. This observation may be due to the various competitive interactions between mosquito species that might affect life history traits, as observed in other studies [59, 60]. Furthermore, despite the increasing occurrence of Culicinae larvae in the presence of Anophelinae larvae, especially Anopheles coluzzii [53], laboratory and field observations clearly indicate that Culex spp. larvae remain by far the most adapted to urban pollution conditions [61]. This ability to adapt to environments drastically altered by human activity has led to Culex mosquito being the most common mosquito found in large African cities [62, 63]. Although no An. stephensi were found during this larval survey, there is a need for such surveys to be repeated especially at/around points of entries of goods which have been identified as the entrance for invasive species in countries through international trade.

At the macro-environmental level, the analysis of satellite data collected during the study period confirmed the influence of climatic factors, such as temperature, rainfall, land use, vegetation index and building density, on the occurrence of An. gambiae s.l. larvae in these habitats [64]. In terms of climate, the results showed that Anopheles larval habitats were preferentially located in urban hot spots with moderate rainfall. These observations, although similar to those in the 2017 study [65], differ from laboratory results that showed the effect of increased ambient temperature on Anopheles life-history parameters such as survival [66, 67] and larval size [68]. This discrepancy in results may be because, unlike in the laboratory where temperature conditions are strictly controlled, ambient temperature conditions in the field are influenced by complex interactions with other factors, such as humidity [69]. In addition, as widely described in literature, rainfall contributes to the formation of temporary or semi-temporary water bodies whose characteristics meet certain requirements of Anopheles mosquitoes in the colonization of their larval habitats [70]. In terms of land use, a parameter that is strongly modulated by human activities, the current study highlights the important role played by the vegetation index and building density in the creation of larval habitats favourable to the development of Anopheles.

The results showed that larval habitats positive for the An. gambiae s.l. were preferentially located at average vegetation index values with a relatively high building density. Their influence on the establishment of Anopheles larval habitats is well documented in literature [21]. More importantly, these results reflect anthropogenic activity, which is one of the key factors in the creation of larval habitats favourable to the development of mosquitoes and, in particular, species of the An. gambiae complex [65, 71]. Given their crucial role in the colonization of Anopheles mosquito larval habitats [53, 57], the absence of water chemistry measurements in this study could be considered as a limitation. Also, it would have been interesting to quantify the An. gambiae larval density and correlate it with the environmental and physical parameters considered in the present study to clearly predict the malaria transmission risk in Woleu Ntem province of Gabon. Furthermore, visiting each larval habitat only once does not account for temporal variability. Environmental conditions, such as precipitation, can change over time, which can impact the presence of Anopheles larvae. By visiting habitats only once, there is a risk of overlooking this variability, which could compromise the understanding of Anopheles population dynamics [72].

Conclusion

The presence of An. gambiae complex larvae in urban larval habitats in the major towns of Woleu-Ntem province is affected by various micro and macro-environmental factors and their interactions, as revealed by this study. These factors include the size of the larval habitat, the presence of other mosquito larvae (micro), temperature, rainfall, land use, vegetation index and building density (macro). Understanding these factors is crucial for the development of effective malaria control strategies, as it allows the targeting of larval habitats that are most conducive to Anopheles reproduction, thereby helping to reduce malaria transmission by reducing Anopheles population density. Furthermore, larval habitat mapping plays a crucial role in the implementation of these effective anti-vector strategies. In addition, remote sensing is proving to be a valuable tool in the study and management of mosquito larval habitats, which can contribute to the prevention and control of mosquito-borne diseases, particularly malaria. The integration of this tool could facilitate the nationwide characterization of areas potentially favourable for the establishment of Anopheles larval habitats. Using ecological modelling tools, it would also be possible to predict the associated risks in these areas, further strengthening malaria control efforts in these malaria hyper-endemic regions.

Availability of data and material

The data is available on request through the corresponding author.

References

  1. Benelli G, Beier JC. Current vector control challenges in the fight against malaria. Acta Trop. 2017;174:91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. World malaria report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  3. WHO. World malaria report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lendzele SS, Rodriquge M-N, Boris M, Kutomy PO, Armel KA, Christophe Z-KR, et al. Is malaria cases frequency correlated with the environmental and demographic composition at Mitzic medical center in Gabon? DYSONA Life Sci. 2022;3:41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bamou R, Sonhafouo-Chiana N, Mavridis K, Tchuinkam T, Wondji CS, Vontas J, et al. Status of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles coluzzii populations from forest settings in south Cameroon. Genes. 2019;10:741.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Machani MG, Ochomo E, Zhong D, Zhou G, Wang X, Githeko AK, et al. Phenotypic, genotypic and biochemical changes during pyrethroid resistance selection in Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Sci Rep. 2020;10:19063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sangbakembi-Ngounou C, Costantini C, Longo-Pendy NM, Ngoagouni C, Akone-Ella O, Rahola N, et al. Diurnal biting of malaria mosquitoes in the central African Republic indicates residual transmission may be “out of control.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119: e2104282119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Antonio-Nkondjio C, Sandjo NN, Awono-Ambene P, Wondji CS. Implementing a larviciding efficacy or effectiveness control intervention against malaria vectors: key parameters for success. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. WHO. Larval source management: a supplementary malaria vector control measure: an operational manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith DL, Perkins TA, Tusting LS, Scott TW, Lindsay SW. Mosquito population regulation and larval source management in heterogeneous environments. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e71247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Derua YA, Kweka EJ, Kisinza WN, Githeko AK, Mosha FW. Bacterial larvicides used for malaria vector control in sub-Saharan Africa: review of their effectiveness and operational feasibility. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:426.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mapua SA, Finda MF, Nambunga IH, Msugupakulya BJ, Ukio K, Chaki PP, et al. Addressing key gaps in implementation of mosquito larviciding to accelerate malaria vector control in southern Tanzania: results of a stakeholder engagement process in local district councils. Malar J. 2021;20:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ortiz Matos DI, Piche Ovares MM, Romero Vega LM, Wagman J, Troyo RA. The impact of deforestation, urbanization, and changing land use patterns on the ecology of mosquito and tick-borne diseases in central America. Insects. 2021;13:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hardy A, Oakes G, Hassan J, Yussuf Y. Improved use of drone imagery for malaria vector control through technology-assisted digitizing (tad). Remote Sensing. 2022;14:317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wimberly MC, de Beurs KM, Loboda TV, Pan WK. Satellite observations and malaria: new opportunities for research and applications. Trends Parasitol. 2021;37:525–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Carrasco-Escobar G, Moreno M, Fornace K, Herrera-Varela M, Manrique E, Conn JE. The use of drones for mosquito surveillance and control. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hardy A, Ettritch G, Cross DE, Bunting P, Liywalii F, Sakala J, et al. Automatic detection of open and vegetated water bodies using Sentinel 1 to map African malaria vector mosquito breeding habitats. Remote Sens. 2019;11:593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmieder M, Holl F, Fotteler ML, Örtl M, Buchner E, Swoboda W. 2020 Remote sensing and on-site characterization of wetlands as potential habitats for malaria vectors–a pilot study in southern Germany. In: 2020 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC).

  19. Kofidou M, de Courcy WM, Nearchou A, Veletza S, Gemitzi A, Karakasiliotis I. Applying remotely sensed environmental information to model mosquito populations. Sustainability. 2021;13:7655.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang A-L, Lee M-C, Zhou G, Zhong D, Hawaria D, Kibret S, et al. Predicting distribution of malaria vector larval habitats in Ethiopia by integrating distributed hydrologic modeling with remotely sensed data. Sci Rep. 2021;11:10150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Djamouko-Djonkam L, Mounchili-Ndam S, Kala-Chouakeu N, Nana-Ndjangwo SM, Kopya E, Sonhafouo-Chiana N, et al. Spatial distribution of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato larvae in the urban environment of Yaoundé. Cameroon Infect Dis Poverty. 2019;8:84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mlacha YP, Chaki PP, Mwakalinga VM, Govella NJ, Limwagu AJ, Paliga JM, et al. Fine scale mapping of malaria infection clusters by using routinely collected health facility data in urban Dar es Salaam. Tanzania Geospat Health. 2017;12:494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lendongo-Wombo J-B, Oyegue-Liabagui S-L, Biteghe-Bi-Essone J-C, Ngoungou EB, Lekana-Douki J-B. Epidemiology of malaria from 2019 to 2021 in the southeastern city of Franceville. Gabon BMC Public Health. 2022;22:2313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mawili-Mboumba DP, Akotet MKB, Kendjo E, Nzamba J, Medang MO, Mbina J-RM, et al. Increase in malaria prevalence and age of at risk population in different areas of Gabon. Malar J. 2013;12:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lendongo Wombo JB, Ibinga E, Oyegue-Liabagui SL, Imboumy Limoukou RK, Okouga AP, et al. Severe malaria in children and adolescents in Southeast Gabon. BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23:207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gayan Dharmasiri A, Perera AY, Harishchandra J, Herath H, Aravindan K, Jayasooriya H, et al. First record of Anopheles stephensi in Sri Lanka: a potential challenge for prevention of malaria reintroduction. Malar J. 2017;16:326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sinka ME, Pironon S, Massey NC, Longbottom J, Hemingway J, Moyes CL, et al. A new malaria vector in Africa: predicting the expansion range of Anopheles stephensi and identifying the urban populations at risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:24900–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. WHO. Initiative to stop the spread of Anopheles stephensi in Africa. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Faulde MK, Rueda LM, Khaireh BA. First record of the Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi and its possible role in the resurgence of malaria in Djibouti. Horn of Africa Acta Trop. 2014;139:39–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas S, Ravishankaran S, Justin JA, Asokan A, Mathai MT, Valecha N, et al. Overhead tank is the potential breeding habitat of Anopheles stephensi in an urban transmission setting of Chennai. India Malar J. 2016;15:274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Balkew M, Mumba P, Dengela D, Yohannes G, Getachew D, Yared S, et al. Geographical distribution of Anopheles stephensi in eastern Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Service MW. Mosquito ecology: field sampling methods. London: Elsevier Science; 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Coetzee M. Key to the females of Afrotropical Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Malar J. 2020;19:70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gillies MT, De Meillon B. The Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Ethiopian zoogeographical region). S Afr Inst Med Res. 1968;54:1–343.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Arvor D, Meirelles MSP, Martorano LG, Jonathan M, Dubreuil V, Herlin I, Berroir J-P. 2008 Séries temporais de EVI/MODIS na identificação da dinâmica da Soja em Sistema Plantio Direto no Mato Grosso, Brasil. XVII RBMCSA.

  36. Boussougou GB. 2017 Vulnérabilité des paysages forestiers en relation avec les activités humaines et la variabilité climatique en Tanzanie: analyse prospective des dynamiques de l'occupation du sol des réserves forestières de Pugu et de Kazimzumbwi. Thèse, Université de la Réunion.

  37. Lê S, Josse J, Husson F. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw. 2008;25:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Husson F, Josse J, Le S, Mazet J, Husson MF. Package ‘factominer.’ An R package. 2016;96:698.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Team RC, Team MRC, Suggests M, Matrix S. Package “stats.”. Ra lang environment stat comput Vienna. Austria: R Found for Statis Comput. 2013.

  40. Yamashita T, Yamashita K, Kamimura R. A stepwise AIC method for variable selection in linear regression. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2007;36:2395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Soc Methods Res. 2004;33:261–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA, Somers KM. How many principal components? Stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2005;49:974–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. De Silva PM, Marshall J. Factors contributing to urban malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. J Trop Med. 2012;2012: 819563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kibret S, Wilson GG, Ryder D, Tekie H, Petros B. Can water-level management reduce malaria mosquito abundance around large dams in sub-Saharan Africa? PLoS ONE. 2018;13: e0196064.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Finda MF, Christofides N, Lezaun J, Tarimo B, Chaki P, Kelly AH, et al. Opinions of key stakeholders on alternative interventions for malaria control and elimination in Tanzania. Malar J. 2020;19:164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Robert V, Macintyre K, Keating J, Trape J-F, Duchemin J-B, Warren M, et al. Malaria transmission in urban sub-Saharan Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Doby J, Mouchet J. Écologie larvaire de quelques espèces de Culicidés dans la région de Yaoundé (Sud-Cameroun). Bull Soc Path Exot. 1957;50:945–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Awolola T, Oduola A, Obansa J, Chukwurar N, Unyimadu J. Anopheles gambiae s.s breeding in polluted water bodies in urban Lagos, southwestern Nigeria. J Vector Borne Dis. 2007;44:241.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tene B, Antonio-Nkondjio C, Kengne P, Njiokou F, Besansky NJ, Costantini C. Physiological correlates of ecological divergence along an urbanization gradient: differential tolerance to ammonia among molecular forms of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. BMC Ecol. 2013;13:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kamdem C, Fossog BT, Simard F, Etouna J, Ndo C, Kengne P, et al. Anthropogenic habitat disturbance and ecological divergence between incipient species of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e39453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Trape J-F. 1986 L'impact de l'urbanisation sur le paludisme en Afrique centrale. Thèse Doctorat Sciences Naturelles, Université Paris-Sud;.

  52. Simard F, Ayala D, Kamdem GC, Pombi M, Etouna J, Ose K, et al. Ecological niche partitioning between Anopheles gambiae molecular forms in Cameroon: the ecological side of speciation. BMC Ecol. 2009;9:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Longo-Pendy NM, Tene-Fossog B, Tawedi RE, Akone-Ella O, Toty C, Rahola N, et al. Ecological plasticity to ions concentration determines genetic response and dominance of Anopheles coluzzii larvae in urban coastal habitats of Central Africa. Sci Rep. 2021;11:15781.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Doumbe-Belisse P, Kopya E, Ngadjeu CS, Sonhafouo-Chiana N, Talipouo A, Djamouko-Djonkam L, et al. Urban malaria in sub-Saharan Africa: dynamic of the vectorial system and the entomological inoculation rate. Malar J. 2021;20:364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Vanhuysse S, Diédhiou SM, Grippa T, Georganos S, Konaté L, Niang EHA, et al. Fine-scale mapping of urban malaria exposure under data scarcity: an approach centred on vector ecology. Malar J. 2023;22:113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kudom AA, Mensah BA, Agyeman TK. Characterization of mosquito larval habitats and assessment of insecticide-resistance status of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato in urban areas in south western Ghana. J Vector Ecol. 2012;37:77–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tene Fossog B, Kopya E, Ndo C, Menze-Djantio B, Costantini C, Njiokou F, et al. Water quality and Anopheles gambiae larval tolerance to pyrethroids in the cities of Douala and Yaoundé (Cameroon). J Trop Med. 2012;2012: 429817.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kweka EJ, Zhou G, Beilhe LB, Dixit A, Afrane Y, Gilbreath TM, et al. Effects of co-habitation between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Culex quinquefasciatus aquatic stages on life history traits. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Lutz EK, Ha KT, Riffell JA. Distinct navigation behaviors in Aedes, Anopheles and Culex mosquito larvae. J Exp Biol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.221218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Juliano SA. Species interactions among larval mosquitoes: context dependence across habitat gradients. Annu Rev Entomol. 2009;54:37–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Afify A. Potential role of mosquito larvae Culex pipiens as a biological indicator of environmental water pollution in Egypt. J Mosq Res. 2017;7:184–93.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Nchoutpouen E, Talipouo A, Djiappi-Tchamen B, Djamouko-Djonkam L, Kopya E, Ngadjeu CS, et al. Culex species diversity, susceptibility to insecticides and role as potential vector of lymphatic filariasis in the city of Yaoundé. Cameroon PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13: e0007229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kaboré DPA, Soma DD, Gil P, Kientega M, Sawadogo SP, Ouédraogo GA, et al. Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in contrasting areas of the western regions of Burkina Faso: species diversity, abundance and their implications for pathogen transmission. Parasit Vectors. 2023;16:438.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Ndiaye A, Niang EHA, Diène AN, Nourdine MA, Sarr PC, Konaté L, et al. Mapping the breeding sites of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in areas of residual malaria transmission in central western Senegal. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0236607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Mattah PAD, Futagbi G, Amekudzi LK, Mattah MM, de Souza DK, Kartey-Attipoe WD, et al. Diversity in breeding sites and distribution of Anopheles mosquitoes in selected urban areas of southern Ghana. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Christiansen-Jucht C, Parham PE, Saddler A, Koella JC, Basáñez M-G. Temperature during larval development and adult maintenance influences the survival of Anopheles gambiae s.s. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:489.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Christiansen-Jucht C, Parham PE, Saddler A, Koella JC, Basáñez M-G. Larval and adult environmental temperatures influence the adult reproductive traits of Anopheles gambiae ss. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Lyimo EO, Takken W, Koella J. Effect of rearing temperature and larval density on larval survival, age at pupation and adult size of Anopheles gambiae. Entomol Exp Appl. 1992;63:265–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Agyekum TP, Botwe PK, Arko-Mensah J, Issah I, Acquah AA, Hogarh JN, et al. A systematic review of the effects of temperature on Anopheles mosquito development and survival: implications for malaria control in a future warmer climate. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:7255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Getachew D, Balkew M, Tekie H. Anopheles larval species composition and characterization of breeding habitats in two localities in the Ghibe River Basin, southwestern Ethiopia. Malar J. 2020;19:65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Hinne IA, Attah SK, Mensah BA, Forson AO, Afrane YA. Larval habitat diversity and Anopheles mosquito species distribution in different ecological zones in Ghana. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Agyemang-Badu SY, Awuah E, Oduro-Kwarteng S, Dzamesi JYW, Kombian VM, Deku G, et al. 2024 Survey of mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) breeding sites in the Sunyani East Municipality, Bono Region of Ghana. Research Square.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere gratitude to the French Development Agency for their invaluable funding and to the Interdisciplinary Center for Medical Research in Franceville that generously provided the essential materials for collecting Anopheles larvae. Their contribution was essential for the successful implementation of our fieldwork. Additionally, we would like to extend our deep appreciation to the dedicated members of the Provincial Directorate of Public Health and Hygiene of Woleu Ntem. Their invaluable support in the field greatly contributed to the success of this study, and we are grateful to them. We would also like to thank the National Malaria Control Programme for their commendable vision, which brought together multiple research centers (CIRMF, IRET and CERMEL) to participate in this important project “malaria vector mapping in Gabon”. The collaborative efforts have yielded valuable results that will enhance our understanding of Anopheles larval habitats in the Woleu Ntem Province, Gabon.

Funding

This research was funded by the Agence Française de Développement (AFD) for Gabon's National Malaria Control Programme (PNLP) and by the Centre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville (CIRMF), funded by Total Energy Gabon.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Neil-Michel Longo-Pendy and Silas Lendzele Sevidzem have author contribution equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unité de Recherche en Ecologie de la Santé (URES), Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherches Médicales de Franceville (CIRMF), Franceville, Gabon

    Neil-Michel Longo-Pendy, Judicaël Obame-Nkoghe & Lynda-Chancelya Nkoghe-Nkoghe

  2. Laboratoire d’Ecologie des Maladies Transmissibles (LEMAT), Université Libreville Nord (ULN), Libreville, Gabon

    Silas Lendzele Sevidzem & Rodrigue Mintsa-Nguema

  3. Institut de Recherche en Écologie Tropicale (IRET), Libreville, Gabon

    Boris Kevin Makanga, Saturnin Ndotit-Manguiengha, Christophe Roland Zinga Koumba, Jacques François Mavoungou & Rodrigue Mintsa-Nguema

  4. Agence Gabonaise d’Etudes et d’Observations Spatiales (AGEOS), Libreville, Gabon

    Saturnin Ndotit-Manguiengha

  5. Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné, Lambaréné, Gabon

    Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe, Barclaye Ngossanga & Ayôla Akim Adegnika

  6. Institut Für Tropenmedizin, Eberhard Karls Universität, Tübingen, Germany

    Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe & Ayôla Akim Adegnika

  7. Programme National de Lutte Contre Le Paludisme (PNLP), Libreville, Gabon

    Piazzy Obame Ondo Kutomy & Abdul-Safiou Razack

  8. Universite Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar (UCAD), Dakar, Sénégal

    Piazzy Obame Ondo Kutomy

  9. Université des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku (USTM), Franceville, Gabon

    Judicaël Obame-Nkoghe

  10. Institute of Public Health and Hygiene, Libreville, Gabon

    Felicien Kassa Mvoubou

  11. Fondation Pour la Recherche Scientifique (FORS), P.O. Box 88, Cotonou, Benin

    Ayôla Akim Adegnika

  12. German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Ayôla Akim Adegnika

  13. Department of Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Phuthaditjhaba, Republic of South Africa

    Judicaël Obame-Nkoghe

Authors
  1. Neil-Michel Longo-Pendy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Silas Lendzele Sevidzem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Boris Kevin Makanga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saturnin Ndotit-Manguiengha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stravensky Térence Boussougou-Sambe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Piazzy Obame Ondo Kutomy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Judicaël Obame-Nkoghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lynda-Chancelya Nkoghe-Nkoghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Barclaye Ngossanga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Felicien Kassa Mvoubou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Christophe Roland Zinga Koumba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ayôla Akim Adegnika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Abdul-Safiou Razack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jacques François Mavoungou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Rodrigue Mintsa-Nguema
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: RMN, CRZK, POOK, JON, BKM, NMLP, ASR and JFM; Fieldwork: NMLP, LCNN, RMN, CRZK, SLS, FKM, BKM, BN and STBS; Morphotaxonomy of mosquitoes: BKM, STBS, BN, LCNN and NMLP; Geo-spatial analyses: SNM and FTNM; Bio-statistical analyses: NMLP; Writing—original draft: NMLP, SLS and RMN; Writing-review and Editing: NMLP, SLS, BKM, JON, STBS and RMN; Project management: ASR, AAA and JFM.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil-Michel Longo-Pendy.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Competing interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Longo-Pendy, NM., Sevidzem, S.L., Makanga, B.K. et al. Assessment of environmental and spatial factors influencing the establishment of Anopheles gambiae larval habitats in the malaria endemic province of Woleu-Ntem, northern Gabon. Malar J 23, 158 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-04980-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-04980-5

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us