Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of mass media campaigns on knowledge of malaria prevention measures among pregnant mothers in Uganda: a propensity score-matched analysis

Malaria Journal volume 23, Article number: 256 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Uganda grapples with a considerable malaria burden, reporting prevalence rates of over 33% in some regions. To address this, the Uganda Ministry of Health employs audiovisual platforms for disseminating malaria prevention messages. However, the impact of these messages on pregnant women’s knowledge of malaria prevention remains insufficiently explored. This paper therefore emphasizes the influence of audiovisual messages on the knowledge of malaria prevention measures among pregnant women in Uganda.

Methods

Secondary data obtained from the Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) 2018–2019 was used for this analysis. Women aged 15–49 were included in the study. A total of 8868 women were selected using a two-stage sample design. The two stages of selection included clusters and households. Women who were currently pregnant were included in the study, resulting in a weighted sample of 721 women. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to evaluate the impact of access to malaria messages on knowledge of prevention measures.

Results

The study revealed that 39% [95% CI 34.0–44.2] of pregnant women were exposed to malaria messages before the survey. Those exposed had a 17.2% higher knowledge [ATT = 0.172; 95% CI 0.035–0.310] of using mosquito nets for prevention compared to those unexposed. Among women exposed, radios accounted for most form of access to mass media campaigns [64.8, 95% CI 57.0–71.8] followed by interpersonal communication [45.0, 95% CI 37.6–52.6], community health workers [38.8, 95% CI 29.6–48.8], community events [21.4, 95% CI 15.8–28.3], and social mobilization [18.3, 95% CI 12.7–25.8].

Conclusion

Results highlight the importance of radios in spreading important malaria prevention messages to pregnant women. Being exposed to these messages is linked to increased awareness and knowledge about the proper use of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) for preventing malaria. This finding underscores the importance of evaluating different channels for mass media campaigns to ensure the effective delivery of information about malaria prevention to the intended audiences.

Background

Malaria, a life-threatening illness caused by Plasmodium parasites and transmitted through the bite of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes, remains a significant global public health concern, especially during pregnancy [1,2,3]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there were an estimated 288 million cases and 410,000 deaths worldwide in 2018 [4]. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) consistently bears the highest burden, contributing to 93% of cases and 94% of global deaths. Uganda ranks among the top three countries with the highest malaria cases globally, following Nigeria (27%) and the Democratic Republic of Congo (12%) [5]. More than 90% of Uganda’s geographical area is malaria endemic, with prevalence ranging from 9% in the western region, 26% in the West Nile to 33% in the Karamoja sub-region [6,7,8,9], highlighting the uneven distribution of malaria endemicity.

Approximately 35% of the pregnancies in Africa are thought to be affected by malaria [5]. Severe malaria in pregnant women presents a substantial risk of death, frequently attributed to malaria-induced anaemia [1, 10,11,12]. The study by Gontie et al. reveals that malaria-related anaemia is responsible for 10,000 maternal deaths annually in pregnant women in West Ethiopia [13]. Malaria can cause detrimental outcomes on the developing fetus, resulting in various complications such as gestational anaemia, premature birth, low birth weight, stillbirths, intrauterine growth retardation, impaired neurological development, early labour, and spontaneous loss of pregnancy [3, 12, 14].

WHO recommends key malaria prevention strategies, emphasizing the proper use of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITN), intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy (IPTP), and effective management of malaria and anemia cases [15]. Additionally, long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are employed to prevent the interaction between vectors and hosts, which has resulted in a decrease in malaria occurrence [16]. In a recent Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) conducted in Uganda, 83% of households possess at least one insecticide-treated net (ITN), and 54% of households have at least one ITN for every two members [17].

Furthermore, the Ministry of Health Division of Health Education and Promotion has developed various malaria-related messages that have been extensively employed to enhance awareness about malaria, including appropriate measures for prevention, treatment, and control. These messages are disseminated through various forms of media, such as visual and audio platforms like television and radio, billboards or posters, and interpersonal communication through community events and village health teams [18]. Despite these efforts, the Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) conducted in 2019 shows that the exposure of women of reproductive age (15–49 years) to malaria prevention messages (having heard or seen malaria messages) is 39%, while in refugee settlements, it is only 16% [17]. Research has further explored determinants of intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) of malaria during pregnancy [19], utilization of insecticide-treated nets (ITN) [20,21,22,23], among pregnant women. While the link between exposure to malaria prevention messages via different mass media sources, including radio, television, health clinics and the use of IPT during pregnancy (IPTp), ITN and indoor residual spraying (IRS) has been observed [19, 22, 24,25,26,27], studies assessing the impact of these messages on knowledge of malaria prevention are still missing. A matched propensity score analysis, a quasi-experimental design, was used to reliably measure the impact of mass media campaigns on knowledge of malaria prevention. Importantly, this approach provides a quantitative measure of how much effect an intervention may have on a particular outcome. A considerable amount of resources have been committed to various malaria interventions, including social behavioral change and communication (SBCC), in order to combat the high malaria burden in Africa [28]. However, there is limited evidence to date to show that social behavioral change and communication interventions, in particular, have caused a significant change within communities as the malaria burden continues to soar [29]. A recent study conducted among pregnant women attending routine antenatal care at one of the country’s largest healthcare centers found that 3 out of 10 pregnant women examined had malaria [7]. Additionally, statistics on the uptake of malaria interventions such as ITN use and IPTp have stagnated at 83% & 41%, respectively, over the past 5 years in Uganda [17], and reasons for the poor uptake remain inconsistent in different studies [19, 30,31,32]. In light of these findings, we assessed the effect of mass media campaigns on knowledge of malaria prevention among pregnant women using a comprehensive dataset from the 2018–2019 Malaria Indicator Survey in Uganda.

Methods

Data source and study population

The research utilized secondary information from the Uganda MIS 2018–2019 data. This is the most recent MIS data for Uganda. It was conducted in 15 sub-regions in of the country and nine refugee settlements in Northern and Western Uganda, covering a total of 8351 households. The study focused on women aged between 15 and 49 years. A two-stage sample design was used to select 8868 women of childbearing age. This process involved selecting clusters (enumeration areas) in the first stage. This was followed by the systematic selection of households. Of the selected women, 8231 were nationals and 637 were refugees. Important to note is that only pregnant women were included in this study, resulting into a weighted sample of 721 women. More details on how the Uganda MIS data was gathered can be found in the MIS reports [17, 33].

Data analysis

Data analysis involved estimating the prevalence of access to malaria messages and describing baseline characteristics using frequencies, proportions, and their 95% confidence intervals. Characteristics examined included age, education level, parity, sex of the household head, number of household members, woman's education level, type of residence, and region.

The same approach was used to determine the distribution of sources of malaria messages and perceived prevention methods. Cross-tabulations were applied to identify the distribution of malaria message access by women’s characteristics. Stata Version 14.0 was utilized for the analysis.

Propensity score matched analysis (PSMA)

To assess the impact of access to malaria messages on knowledge about malaria prevention methods, we employed a propensity score-matched analysis. The propensity score-matched analysis is a statistical technique that is utilized to determine the treatment effects from observational data [34]. Propensity scores refer to the likelihood of assigning a woman, denoted by “i” (i = 1, 2, …, n), to either the treatment group (women who had access to malaria messages, called “exposed” in this study) or the control group (women who did not have access to malaria messages, called “unexposed” in this study), based on a set of observed baseline characteristics denoted by “X” [35]. The above is represented by [Eq. 1] below.

$$e\left(X\right)=\text{Pr}({Z}_{i}=1|{{\varvec{X}}}_{i}={x}_{i})$$
(1)

which shows that e(X) represents the conditional probability of having access to malaria messages, given the vector of observed characteristics denoted by \({{\varvec{X}}}_{i}={x}_{i}\). The variable Z is an indicator variable that takes the values of 0 and 1, where 0 is assigned to the unexposed group and 1 is assigned to the exposed group. The vector X is associated with access to malaria messages [36,37,38,39].

PSMA is recommended when a randomized clinical trial is impractical, unethical, or prohibitively expensive [39,40,41,42]. This methodology involves the use of observational data and calculates propensity scores for each woman based on measured variables such as age, education level, type of place of residence, and region, which helps to address confounding between participant characteristics and minimize bias [37, 43, 44]. This analysis focused on calculating the Average Treatment Effect of the Treated (ATT) related to knowledge of malaria prevention methods (such as sleeping under insecticide-treated bed nets, intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy, and indoor residual spraying) among individuals who received malaria messages. To ensure fair comparisons between participants, we implemented a 1:1 matching strategy based on participant-level covariates (age and education level) and community-level covariates (such as type of place of residence and region). To estimate the effects of the treatment, we utilized logistic regression as an estimation algorithm and employed radius, caliper (with a tolerance level of 0.05), and nearest neighbor (with a value of 1) as our matching algorithms [45,46,47,48]. The Average Treatment Effect of the Treated (ATT) is framed within a counterfactual framework expressed by [Eq. 2] below.

$$\text{ATT}=\text{E}[{\text{ Y}}_{\text{i}}\left(1\right)- {\text{Y}}_{\text{i}}\left(0\right) | {\text{Z}}_{\text{i}}=1]$$
(2)

where Yi (1) is the outcome in the treatment group, Yi (0) is the outcome in the unexposed group, \(\text{E}[{\text{ Y}}_{\text{i}}\left(1\right)|{\text{Z}}_{\text{i}}=1]\) represents the expected outcome of knowledge regarding mosquito net use, and uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria, assuming that all pregnant women have been exposed to malaria messages. \(\text{E}[{\text{ Y}}_{\text{i}}\left(0\right)|{\text{Z}}_{\text{i}}=1]\) represents the expected outcome of knowledge regarding mosquito net use, and uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria, assuming that all pregnant women have not been exposed to malaria messages (unobserved) [37, 49]. The Average Treatment Effect of the Treated (ATT) signifies the expected difference in knowledge regarding preventive methods, (mosquito net use, and intermittent preventive treatment of malaria), between women in the treatment group and the same women if they were not in the treatment group [50].

The procedure for calculating the treatment effects involved several steps including, which included: (1) selecting appropriate covariates for the propensity score; (2) calculating the propensity score; (3) stratifying and ensuring balance in the propensity scores, and (4) computing the ATT [50].

To establish a counterfactual scenario, women who had been exposed to malaria messages were matched with those who had not, based on four distinguishable covariates, which were: the age and education level of the women, as well as the type of place of residence and region they belonged to. The balance of propensity scores was evaluated between women in the exposed group and those in the unexposed group by analysing graphs illustrating the propensity scores for each group. These graphs demonstrated that there was a balance between the exposed and unexposed groups in terms of overlap between propensity scores and similar distribution. Refer to Figs. 1 and 2 for these graphs. Bootstrapping was used to estimate the standard errors, and respective confidence intervals for the parameter estimates [51]. The off-support individuals were excluded from analysis to ensure unbiased parameter estimates and stable treatments effects [37].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Propensity scores in relation to exposure to malaria messages (1 = Exposed, 0 = Unexposed) and knowledge of sleeping under ITN

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Propensity scores in relation to exposure to malaria messages (1 = Exposed, 0 = Unexposed) and knowledge of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy

Full size image

Variables

  • Treatment Z: Seen/heard any messages about malaria (s111). (Yes (exposed) = 1, No (unexposed) = 0). This is defined as exposure to malaria prevention messages in the study.

  • Outcome Y: There are two outcomes considered in this study as ways to avoid malaria: (1) sleeping under the mosquito net (Yes = 1, No = 0), and (2) taking preventative medication, defined as IPTp (Yes = 1, No = 0). This is defined as knowledge of malaria prevention measures. Each was treated as an independent outcome and the effect of treatment was investigated.

  • Baseline Characteristics X: These include Woman’s age (15–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, 45–49), Woman’s education level (No Education, Primary, Secondary, Higher), residence (urban, rural, refugee) and region (central, eastern, northern, western).

Results

This section presents the prevalence of exposure to malaria messages, sample characteristics before matching and the effect of exposure of malaria messages on knowledge of malaria prevention, that is, use insecticide-treated bed nets (ITN), and uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp).

Prevalence of exposure to malaria messages and the characteristics of the sample population

Among the surveyed group of pregnant women in the MIS 2018–19 study, it was found that 39 [95% CI 34.0–44.2] had been exposed to malaria messages prior to the survey. This group was largely composed of women aged 15–24 years [42.2, 95% CI 37.3–47.2] with a primary level of education [61.9, 95% CI 55.7–67.8] and a parity of 0–1 [40.3, 95% CI 35.5–45.3]. Most lived in male-headed households [75.5, 95% CI 71.4–79.6], with 4–6 household members [38.9, 95% CI 33.8–44.2], from the poorest quintile households; [26.1, 95% CI 21.6–31.2], rural areas [70.9, 95% CI 63.0–77.7], and from Western Uganda [36.4, 95% CI 31.2–42.0]. The results also showed that the highest proportion of women who had access to malaria messages were those aged 15–24 years [37.4, 95% CI 30.9–44.5], with a primary level of education [59.6, 95% CI 50.1–68.5], a parity of 0–1[38.6, 95% CI 31.3–46.5], from male-headed households [76.6, 95% CI 69.5–82.4], living in households with 7 or more members (39.1, 95% CI 29.6–49.4), and from the poorest households [25.6, 95% CI 19.7–32.6]. Women from rural areas had the highest access to malaria messages with [75.4, 95% CI 66.3–82.7] and were mainly from Eastern Uganda [33.9, 95% CI 26.2–42.6]. Significant associations between exposure to malaria messages and education level of women (p < 0.05), woman’s place of residence (p < 0.01) and region (p < 0.05) were observed. The results are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Distribution of currently pregnant women by selected characteristics on the entire sample
Full size table

Sources of malaria messages and malaria prevention methods

Among women who have heard or seen malaria messages, radios were the highest source, accounting for [64.8, 95% CI 57.0–71.8] followed by interpersonal communication [45.0, 95% CI 37.6–52.6], community health workers [38.8, 95% CI 29.6–48.8], community events [21.4, 95% CI 15.8–28.3], and social mobilization [18.3, 95% CI 12.7–25.8]. In contrast, billboards [17.6, 95% CI 11.8–25.3], televisions [16.6, 95% CI 10.8–24.6], flyers [11.4, 95% CI 6.6–19.0], and social media [6.2, 95% CI 3.0–12.5] accounted for lower proportions of messages accessed through these platforms. Most women [74.4, 95% CI 67.1, 80.5] stated that sleeping under the net is an effective way to prevent malaria, while only [6.7, 95% CI 4.7, 9.5] maintained that taking preventative medicine prevents malaria. Results are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Sources of malaria messages and prevention methods
Full size table

Effect of exposure to malaria messages on knowledge of malaria prevention

The propensity score graphs used to assess the matching quality of pregnant women exposed to malaria messages and those unexposed by ITN and IPTp are presented in Figs. 1 and 2. Figure 1 indicates well-balanced groups with comparable distributions based on mosquito net use. No deviation from the expected distribution is observed, suggesting suitability for comparison. The propensity score graph assessing matching quality among pregnant women exposed to malaria messages and those unexposed, based on their uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy (IPTp), reveals balanced groups with some off-support. The off-support was excluded when examining the impact of access to malaria messages on knowledge of IPTp uptake. The results are shown in Fig. 2.

After matching, to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) for knowledge of mosquito net use, and intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy, the descriptive statistics indicated that the ATT was 17.2% ± 0.076 for mosquito net use, and 0.037 ± 0.046 for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy. The results are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Estimation of ATT of Access to Malaria Messages on Knowledge of Prevention of Malaria
Full size table

The implications of these findings can be seen in Table 4, in which the standard errors were calculated using bootstrapping with 150 repetitions. The table indicates that women who have been exposed to malaria messages are 17.2% more likely to have knowledge of mosquito net use [ATT = 0.172; 95% CI 0.035–0.310] compared to those who have not been exposed to these messages. This suggests that exposure to malaria messages increases the knowledge of using mosquito nets to prevent malaria by up to 17.2% compared to those who have not been exposed to the messages. The study found that exposure to malaria messages had a positive effect on knowledge of preventive treatment of malaria, with an estimated [ATT = 0.037; 95% CI − 0.047–0.121]. This indicates that women who have heard or seen malaria messages had a 4% higher likelihood of knowing preventative medication as a preventive measure for malaria compared to women who had not seen or heard malaria messages. In general, the findings from this study suggest that exposure to malaria messages is linked to greater awareness of the importance of using insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) as a preventative measure against malaria. However, there was no significant effect of exposure to messages on uptake of preventative medication, which is a key strategy for malaria prevention and control in Uganda. The results are shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Quality of matching and average treatment effects on the treated (ATT) of access to malaria message on malaria prevention
Full size table

Discussion

This study is the first to investigate the influence of health education and promotion initiatives by the Uganda Ministry of Health targeting awareness about malaria and its prevention, focusing on two WHO-recommended strategies: the consistent use of insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) and intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy (IPTp). To assess the impact of exposure to malaria prevention messages on maternal knowledge of malaria prevention and control measures, a nationally representative sample and propensity score-matched analysis was used. In general, nearly 40% of pregnant women reported having seen or heard malaria prevention messages, with the majority receiving information through radios, interpersonal communication, and community health workers. The study found that the level of knowledge regarding intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy (IPTp), referred to as preventative medication in this study, did not show a significant difference among women exposed to malaria messages and those who were unexposed to these messages. However, exposure to malaria messages did impact the level of knowledge regarding the use of ITNs as a preventive measure. The recent national surveys and other research studies suggest that the differences in access, availability, and utilization of crucial malaria intervention measures may account for these results [17, 33, 52, 53].

Other studies have identified several methods to disseminate malaria messages such as radios, television, posters, community events and dialogues, community healthcare workers, and interpersonal communication [54,55,56,57]. In alignment with these findings, our study observed radios, interpersonal communication, and community health workers as the primary sources of malaria messages. The existing research has consistently shown that exposure to malaria-related messages is associated with an increased use of ITNs [16, 54, 56, 58,59,60] and IPTp [18, 19, 21, 26, 61]. In the current study, after matching exposed and unexposed pregnant women based on age, education level, residence, and region within the MIS 2018–19 dataset, it was found that exposure to malaria messages had a significant and positive impact on knowledge of malaria prevention by user ITNs.

The outcomes of this study are consistent with previous research that established a positive correlation between exposure to mass media and the use of ITNs, as mentioned earlier. The results of this study regarding the influence of exposure to malaria messages on knowledge of using ITNs as a malaria prevention measure are consistent with studies conducted in Cameroon and Ghana [62, 63]. However, this study found no significant effect of malaria message exposure on IPTp as a malaria prevention method in Uganda. It is not clear why mass media campaigns have minimal effect on knowledge of IPTp. However, it is possible that media content may lack sufficient information about IPTp. Typically, IPTp is started in the second trimester [64, 65], which also means that pregnant women who are late for their second or subsequent visits miss out on this important intervention. As a result, this affects both the uptake and exposure to knowledge about this crucial malaria intervention during pregnancy.

It is important to note that the findings of this study rely on observational data, and while propensity score-matched analysis can reduce bias from observable characteristics, there is still a possibility of bias due to unobserved confounders. This may result in an over or underestimation of the impact of malaria message exposure on pregnant women’s knowledge of malaria prevention. Although randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard for establishing causality, they are not always feasible or ethical [66,67,68] and require a lot of time to execute. In such cases, propensity score-matched analysis offers a better alternative. Therefore, the researchers chose this method to answer their research question. Equally, the knowledge of malaria prevention measures was based on the item asking whether women knew ways on how malaria can be prevented. This was a multiple-response question which included, among others, the use of mosquito bed nets and using of preventative medication. Each of these was measured as an independent outcome and thus, women who mentioned any of these were regarded as having knowledge of malaria prevention. This may not have provided an overall knowledge score of malaria prevention measurement. The researchers could not solve this problem since secondary data were used. In addition, the sample size reduced after matching and such a low sample could have affected the findings of the study. A study with a very large sample size could be very necessary to verify these findings. Lastly, this study was based on the analysis of secondary data, which made it impractical to evaluate the impact of mass media campaigns on the uptake of various malaria prevention measures. However, the results provide the first piece of evidence that mass media campaigns may have a limited impact on certain malaria prevention measures, indicating a need to appraise the current SBCC strategies.

Conclusion and recommendations

The findings revealed that nearly 40% of pregnant women had interacted with malaria prevention-related messages, primarily through radios, community health workers, and interpersonal interactions. The propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated a significant and positive impact of exposure to malaria messages on knowledge of preventing malaria through ITN use. It is crucial to implement effective strategies for disseminating information about malaria, including its causes, prevention, and treatment, to enhance knowledge of malaria prevention through ITN use in Uganda. However, further investigation is necessary to understand why these messages have a limited impact on knowledge of IPTp. This exploration will help identify barriers and inform the development of more targeted and effective messaging strategies to promote IPTp uptake among pregnant women in Uganda.

Availability of data and materials

Data used in this manuscript was obtained from MEASURE Demographic Health Survey (DHS) Program which granted access to thedataset up n request. The link is https://dhsprogram.com/data/dataset_admin/index.cfm.

Abbreviations

ATT:

Average treatment effect of the treated

IPT:

Intermittent preventive treatment

IPTp:

Intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy

IRS:

Indoor residual spraying

ITN:

Insecticide-treated net

LLINs:

Long-lasting insecticidal nets

MIS:

Malaria indicator survey

PSMA:

Propensity score matched analysis

SBCC:

Social behavioural change and communication

SSA:

Sub-Saharan Africa

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Dosoo DK, Chandramohan D, Atibilla D, Oppong FB, Ankrah L, Kayan K, et al. Epidemiology of malaria among pregnant women during their first antenatal clinic visit in the middle belt of Ghana: a cross sectional study. Malar J. 2020;19:381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mbonye AK, Buregyeya E, Rutebemberwa E, Clarke SE, Lal S, Hansen KS, et al. Treatment and prevention of malaria in pregnancy in the private health sector in Uganda: implications for patient safety. Malar J. 2016;15:212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Oladeinde BH, Omoregie R, Odia I, Oladeinde OB. Prevalence of malaria and anemia among pregnant women attending a traditional birth home in Benin City, Nigeria. Oman Med J. 2012;27:232–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO. World malaria report 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. WHO. World malaria report 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colón-González FJ, Tompkins AM, Biondi R, Bizimana JP, Namanya DB, Salam A, et al. Assessing the effects of air temperature and rainfall on malaria incidence: an epidemiological study across Rwanda and Uganda. Geospat Health. 2016;11(Suppl 1):379.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mangusho C, Mwebesa E, Izudi J, Aleni M, Dricile R, Ayiasi RM, et al. High prevalence of malaria in pregnancy among women attending antenatal care at a large referral hospital in northwestern Uganda: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0283755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Namusoke F, Rasti N, Kironde F, Wahlgren M, Mirembe F. Malaria burden in pregnancy at Mulago National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. Malar Res Treat. 2010;2010:913857.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalyetsi R, Nafungo G, Muwanguzi E. Malaria infections among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at Bududa hospital, eastern Uganda. J Protozool Res. 2019;29:44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Okoyo C, Githinji E, Muia RW, Masaku J, Mwai J, Nyandieka L, et al. Assessment of malaria infection among pregnant women and children below five years of age attending rural health facilities of Kenya: a cross-sectional survey in two counties of Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0257276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hill J, Hoyt J, van Eijk AM, Mello-Guyett LD, ter Kuile FO, Steketee R, et al. Factors affecting the delivery, access, and use of interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001488.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Djabanor J, Quansah E, Asante D. Effects of malaria in pregnancy (MiP) on pregnancy development and its outcome: a critical review. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2017;5:8–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gontie GB, Wolde HF, Baraki AG. Prevalence and associated factors of malaria among pregnant women in Sherkole district, Benishangul Gumuz regional state, West Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Accrombessi M, Yovo E, Cottrell G, Agbota G, Gartner A, Martin-prevel Y, et al. Cohort profile: effect of malaria in early pregnancy on fetal growth in Benin (RECIPAL preconceptional cohort). BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. WHO. Malaria in pregnancy: guidelines for measuring key monitoring and evaluation indicators. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kebede Y, Abebe L, Alemayehu G, Sudhakar M. School-based social and behavior change communication (SBCC) advances community exposure to malaria messages, acceptance, and preventive practices in Ethiopia: a pre- posttest study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0235189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Uganda National Malaria Control Division (NMCD), Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey 2018–19. Kampala, Uganda, 2020. https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/MIS34/MIS34.pdf

  18. Yaya S, Uthman OA, Amouzou A, Bishwajit G. Mass media exposure and its impact on malaria prevention behaviour among adult women in sub-Saharan Africa: results from malaria indicator surveys. Glob Health Res Policy. 2018;3:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Okethwangu D, Opigo J, Atugonza S, Kizza CT, Nabatanzi M, Biribawa C, et al. Factors associated with uptake of optimal doses of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria among pregnant women in Uganda: analysis of data from the Uganda Demographic and Health Survey, 2016. Malar J. 2019;18:250.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawuki J, Donkor E, Gatasi G, Nuwabaine L. Mosquito bed net use and associated factors among pregnant women in Rwanda: a nationwide survey. Res Square. 2022;60:130.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Amankwah S, Anto F. Factors associated with uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study in private health facilities in Tema Metropolis, Ghana. J Trop Med. 2019;2019:9278432.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nadew J, Obsa MS, Alemayehu A, Haji Y. Utilization of insecticide treated nets among pregnant women in sodo zuria woreda Southern Ethiopia. Front Trop Dis. 2022;3:926893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yitayew AE, Enyew HD, Goshu YA. Utilization and associated factors of insecticide treated bed net among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic of Addis Zemen Hospital, North-Western Ethiopia: an institutional based study. Malar Res Treat. 2018;2018:3647184.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hlongwana KW, Mavundza EJ, Mohapi EP, Kruger P, Urbach J, Mukaratirwa S, et al. Vector-control personnel’s knowledge, perceptions and practices towards insecticides used for indoor residual spraying in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mazigo HD, Obasy E, Mauka W, Manyiri P, Zinga M, Kweka EJ, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices about malaria and its control in rural Northwest Tanzania. Malar Res Treat. 2010;2010:794261.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kofuor E, Darteh M, Dickson KS, Ahinkorah BO, Owusu BA, Okyere J, et al. Factors influencing the uptake of intermittent preventive treatment among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis. Arch Public Health. 2021;79:182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ediau M, Babirye JN, Tumwesigye NM, Matovu JKB, Machingaidze S, Okui O, et al. Community knowledge and perceptions about indoor residual spraying for malaria prevention in Soroti district, Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Malar J. 2013;12:170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. WHO. Bridging the funding gap to defeat malaria in Africa. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  29. WHO. Malaria. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ameyaw EK. Uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) in Uganda: a national survey. Malar J. 2022;21:285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wafula ST, Mendoza H, Nalugya A, Musoke D, Waiswa P. Determinants of uptake of malaria preventive interventions among pregnant women in eastern Uganda. Malar J. 2021;20:5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin MK, Venantius KB, Patricia N, Bernard K, Keith B, Allen K, et al. Correlates of uptake of optimal doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for prevention of malaria during pregnancy in East-Central Uganda. Malar J. 2020;19:153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. National Malaria Control Division (NMCD) & Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). 2018–19 Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey ( UMIS ) - Atlas of Key Indicators. 2018. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/ATR21/ATR21.pdf

  34. Ridgeway G, Kovalchik SA, Griffin BA, Kabeto MU. Propensity score analysis with survey weighted data. J Causal Inference. 2015;3:237–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xi SG, Carolina N, Hill C, Chen Q. Propensity score analysis: recent debate and discussion. J Soc Social Work Res. 2020;11:463–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Guo S, Fraser MW. Propensity score analysis: statistical methods and applications. Washington DC: Sage; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ali MS, Prieto-alhambra D, Lopes LC, Ramos D, Bispo N, Ichihara MY, et al. Propensity score methods in health technology assessment: principles, extended applications, and recent advances. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Morgan CJ. Reducing bias using propensity score matching. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;25:404–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Littnerova S, Jarkovsky J, Parenica J, Pavlik T. Why to use propensity score in observational studies? Case study based on data from the Czech clinical database AHEAD 2006–2009. Cor Vasa. 2013;55:e383–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2013.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Qin R, Titler MG, Shever LL, Kim T. Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis. Nurs Res. 2008;57:444–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Okoli GN, Sanders RD, Myles P. Demystifying propensity scores. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:13–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ. The propensity score. J Am Med Assoc. 2016;314:1637–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yaya S, Gunawardena N, Bishwajit G. Association between intimate partner violence and utilization of facility delivery services in Nigeria: a propensity score matching analysis. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen L, Liu F, Wang B, Wang K. Subxiphoid vs transthoracic approach thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a propensity score-matched analysis. BMC Surg. 2019;19:46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Baser O. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Value Health. 2006;9:377–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometriks. 2018;70:41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mwebesa E, Kagaayi J, Ssebagereka A, Nakafeero M, Ssenkusu JM, Guwatudde D, et al. Effect of four or more antenatal care visits on facility delivery and early postnatal care services utilization in Uganda : a propensity score matched analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Garrido MM, Kelley AS, Paris J, Roza K, Meier DE, Morrison RS, et al. Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Serv Res. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Austin PC, Small DS. The use of bootstrapping when using propensity-score matching without replacement: a simulation study. Stat Med. 2014;33:4306–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. US-PMI. Uganda Progresses in Malaria Fight. 2012. https://www.pmi.gov/uganda-progresses-in-malaria-fight/

  53. Epstein A, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Namuganga JF, Nankabirwa JI, Gonahasa S, Opigo J, et al. Resurgence of malaria in Uganda despite sustained indoor residual spraying and repeated long lasting insecticidal net distributions. PLoS Glob Public Health. 2022;2:e0000676.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Adjah ESO, Panayiotou AG. Impact of malaria related messages on insecticide-treated net (ITN) use for malaria prevention in Ghana. Malar J. 2014;13:123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Flatie BT. Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards malaria among people attending Mekaneeyesus Primary Hospital, South Gondar, Northwestern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. J Parasitol Res. 2021;2021:5580715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Apo SB, Kwankye SO, Badasu DM. Exposure to malaria prevention messages and insecticide treated bednet usage among children under five years in Ghana. Eur Sci J. 2015;11:290–305.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Pinto LDS, Arroz JAH, Martins RO, Hartz Z, Negrao N, Muchanga V, et al. Malaria prevention knowledge, attitudes, and practices in Zambezia Province, Mozambique. Malar J. 2021;20:293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zalisk K, Herrera S, Inyang U, Mohammed AB, Uhomoibhi P. Caregiver exposure to malaria social and behaviour change messages can improve bed net use among children in an endemic country: secondary analysis of the 2015 Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey. Malar J. 2019;18:121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Nkoka O, Chuang T-W, Chen Y-H. Influence of maternal exposure to malaria social and behavioral change messages and effectiveness of communication media on bed net use and malaria infection in Malawi. Health Educ Behav. 2021;48:179–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sonibare OO, Bello IS, Olowookere SA, Shabi O, Makinde NO. Effect of malaria preventive education on the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets among pregnant females in a Teaching Hospital in Osun State, south-west Nigeria. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2020;11:e00182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Flueckiger RM, Thierno DM, Colaço R, Bangoura L, Reithinger R, Fitch ER, et al. Using short message service alerts to increase antenatal care and malaria prevention : findings from implementation research pilot in Guinea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;101:806–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Bowen HL. Impact of a mass media campaign on bed net use in Cameroon. Malar J. 2013;13:36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Boulay M, Lynch M, Koenker H. Comparing two approaches for estimating the causal effect of behaviour-change communication messages promoting insecticide-treated bed nets: an analysis of the 2010 Zambia malaria indicator survey. Malar J. 2014;13:342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. WHO. Community deployment of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine: a field guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024.

    Google Scholar 

  65. WHO. Policy brief for the implementation of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy. WHO Golbal Malaria Programme. 2014. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/WHO_RHR_01.30.pdf

  66. Bosdriesz JR, Stel VS, van Diepen M, Meuleman Y, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, et al. Evidence-based medicine—when observational studies are better than randomized controlled trials. Nephrology. 2020;25:737–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gilmartin-Thomas JFM, Liew D, Hopper I. Observational studies and their utility for practice. Aust Prescr. 2018;41:82–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Moneer O, Daly G, Skydel JJ, Nyhan K, Lurie P, Ross JS, et al. Agreement of treatment effects from observational studies and randomized controlled trials evaluating hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir-ritonavir, or dexamethasone for covid-19: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2022;377:e069400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the MEASURE Demographic Health Survey (DHS) Program for granting them access to their dataset.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science, Muni University, Arua, Uganda

    Edson Mwebesa

  2. School of Science and Aerospace Studies, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya

    Edson Mwebesa

  3. School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA

    Susan Awor

  4. School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

    Charles Natuhamya & Nazarius M. Tumwesigye

  5. Faculty of Health Sciences, Muni University, Arua, Uganda

    Ratib Dricile, Ismail D. Legason & Richard Mangwi Ayiasi

  6. Department of Oncology, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Ismail D. Legason

  7. Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, Africa Renewal University, Buloba, Uganda

    David Okimait

Authors
  1. Edson Mwebesa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan Awor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charles Natuhamya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ratib Dricile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ismail D. Legason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David Okimait
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Richard Mangwi Ayiasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Nazarius M. Tumwesigye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EM – Conceptualized the study, methods, analysis and wrote the initial draft, SA, CN—Contributed to methods, data analysis and review of manuscript, RD, IDL, DO, RMA and NMT—provided extensive edits and inputs. All authors read and approved the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edson Mwebesa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study obtained approval from MEASURE DHS to use their data, but consent to participate was not necessary as this was a secondary analysis of non-identifiable, publicly available data. The researchers treated the DHS data confidentially, and no attempt was made to identify individual women interviewed in the survey. All procedures were conducted in compliance with applicable guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mwebesa, E., Awor, S., Natuhamya, C. et al. Impact of mass media campaigns on knowledge of malaria prevention measures among pregnant mothers in Uganda: a propensity score-matched analysis. Malar J 23, 256 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-05083-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-05083-x

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us