Skip to main content

Artemisinin-based combination therapy does not measurably reduce human infectiousness to vectors in a setting of intense malaria transmission



Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for treating malaria has activity against immature gametocytes. In theory, this property may complement the effect of terminating otherwise lengthy malaria infections and reducing the parasite reservoir in the human population that can infect vector mosquitoes. However, this has never been verified at a population level in a setting with intense transmission, where chronically infectious asymptomatic carriers are common and cured patients are rapidly and repeatedly re-infected.


From 2001 to 2004, malaria vector densities were monitored using light traps in three Tanzanian districts. Mosquitoes were dissected to determine parous and oocyst rates. Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite rates were determined by ELISA. Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) monotherapy was used for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in the contiguous districts of Kilombero and Ulanga throughout this period. In Rufiji district, the standard drug was changed to artesunate co-administered with SP (AS + SP) in March 2003. The effects of this change in case management on malaria parasite infection in the vectors were analysed.


Plasmodium falciparum entomological inoculation rates exceeded 300 infective bites per person per year at both sites over the whole period. The introduction of AS + SP in Rufiji was associated with increased oocyst prevalence (OR [95%CI] = 3.9 [2.9-5.3], p < 0.001), but had no consistent effect on sporozoite prevalence (OR [95%CI] = 0.9 [0.7-1.2], p = 0.5). The estimated infectiousness of the human population in Rufiji was very low prior to the change in drug policy. Emergence rates and parous rates of the vectors varied substantially throughout the study period, which affected estimates of infectiousness. The latter consequently cannot be explained by the change in drug policy.


In high perennial transmission settings, only a small proportion of infections in humans are symptomatic or treated, so case management with ACT may have little impact on overall infectiousness of the human population. Variations in infection levels in vectors largely depend on the age distribution of the mosquito population. Benefits of ACT in suppressing transmission are more likely to be evident where transmission is already low or effective vector control is widely implemented.


Currently, artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is used as first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in most countries in sub-Saharan Africa. In addition to killing the asexual blood stages that cause disease and, therefore, terminating otherwise lengthy, persistently transmissible infections[13], artemisinins are gametocytocidal, killing the immature sexual stages of malaria parasites eventually responsible for infecting mosquitoes[4, 5]. While non-gametocyctocidal drugs will also cure otherwise lengthy infections and reduce the period of infectiousness to mosquitoes, gametocytes will remain in the cured individual for some time, allowing for transmission.

In principle, through their combined impacts upon both the short-term infectiousness of treated individuals, and perhaps more importantly[6], upon the long-term duration of infection and therefore infectiousness, ACT might reduce the reservoir of parasites in the human population that eventually infects mosquitoes.

The provision of ACT for treatment of uncomplicated malaria has been associated with reduced malaria incidence in diverse settings with modest transmission intensity[4, 7, 8]. This implies that ACT may effectively reduce human-to-mosquito and consequently mosquito-to-human transmission under normal conditions of programmatic use, as has been suggested in individually randomized, controlled trials evaluating the infectiousness of patients receiving ACT[911].

Determination of the proportion of humans harbouring gametocytes following ACT treatment may not accurately estimate human population infectiousness since infectiousness seems only loosely correlated to gametocyte density[12, 13]. In malaria-endemic settings, humans can be infectious to mosquitoes even in the absence of patent gametocytaemia, regardless of treatment[1, 1416]. While human-to-mosquito feeding experiments with laboratory-reared mosquitoes are very useful, they do not capture parasite infection and selection dynamics in the context of their human host populations[1720] and are not necessarily representative of the wild mosquito populations which have natural feeding biases influenced by host age and infection status[2124]. Estimation of the human infectious reservoir therefore requires analysis of the infection status of wild-caught mosquitoes.

A pre-post observational study with a contemporaneous comparison group was used to evaluate the impact of case management with ACT delivered through fixed health facilities in two sites in rural Tanzania with intense malaria transmission[25]. Both the intervention and comparison sites used sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) as first-line treatment of malaria in 2001–2003. In March 2003, the ACT, artesunate co-administered with SP (AS + SP), was introduced as a first-line treatment of malaria in the intervention site while SP continued to be used for first-line treatment in the comparison site. To assess the impact of ACT introduction on malaria transmission, concurrent measures of oocyst and sporozoite prevalence in the mosquito-vector population in both the intervention and comparison districts, before and after the introduction of AS + SP, were carried out and used to directly determine the infectiousness of the human population to mosquitoes, and of mosquitoes to humans.


Study site

This study was conducted in two rural sites in southeastern Tanzania. Rufiji District, the intervention site, is located at the mouth of the Rufiji River, extends across latitudes 7° 47′ and 8° 03′S and longitudes 38° 62′ and 39° 17′E with a population of about 202,001 inhabitants[26, 27]. Kilombero and Ulanga Districts, the comparison site, form the valley of the Kilombero River, one of the main tributaries of the Rufiji and are situated between latitudes 8°00'–8°35'S, longitudes 35°58'–36°48'E and have a combined population of 514,891 inhabitants[27, 28] (Figure1). Both Rufiji and Kilombero-Ulanga Districts have achieved relatively high coverage of largely untreated bed nets[29, 30] and are characterized by a hot climate with an erratic rainy season from November to May. In Rufiji, the average annual precipitation is 800–1,000 mm while Kilombero-Ulanga receives 1,200-1,800 mm. In both settings, malaria caused largely by Plasmodium falciparum[31] is one of the biggest health problems perceived by the local community and reported by the health services[32]. It is primarily transmitted by Anopheles gambiae Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus. Transmission is intense and perennial despite marked seasonality in mosquito densities, which peak with the rains[31, 33].

Figure 1

Map of the study districts. A: Rufiji; B: Kilombero; C: Ulanga.

Study design

The detailed description of the study is reported elsewhere[25]. Briefly, a pre-post observational study with a non-randomized comparison site was conducted. Both sites used SP monotherapy as a first-line anti-malarial delivered through health facilities from 2001. In March 2003, the Council Health Management Team implemented AS + SP combination therapy as the first-line anti-malarial provided free of charge through all the fixed health facilities in Rufiji District, the intervention site. SP monotherapy continued to be the first-line anti-malarial in Kilombero-Ulanga, the comparison site, as well as in the rest of the country. Here, SP was available free of charge only to pregnant women and children under five years of age.

Mosquito data collection

In each site, anopheline indoor biting rates were determined by overnight trapping of host-seeking mosquitoes using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light traps. The two sites used slightly different household selection procedures. Sampling in Kilombero-Ulanga occurred from October 2001 to August 2004 and was based on repeated sampling every six months of 25 clusters of households selected by stratified random sampling, using the sub-village (kitongoji) as the first level and index household as the second level of randomization[29]. Trapping was carried out on 538 different nights, with an average of 4.9 traps per night. The traps were clustered in houses around the index house, but out of sight of each other.

In Rufiji, the period sampled included a 17-month pre-intervention period of October 2001 to February 2003 and a 19-month post-intervention period of March 2003 to September 2004. Individual households were randomly selected monthly from the same demographic surveillance sample frame used for surveys of human malaria infection[25]. Trapping was carried out on 850 distinct dates, with an average of 6.6 traps per night.

Light traps were installed about 0.5 m above the floor, next to the foot of the bed of the selected person who slept under a mosquito net. No attempt was made to differentiate between treated and untreated nets in the field as this proved impractical during routine field surveys and insecticide treatment has only a minor effect on sampling efficiency[29, 34]. On occasions when the selected individual for light trap sampling lacked a net, he or she was provided with an untreated net for the nights during which they participated.

Once collected, mosquitoes were counted and sorted by species in the field. Where this was feasible, blood-fed female An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus were held in a cup and fed on sugar water until the blood meal was digested, this period ranges from two to three days depending on temperature. Then, the mid-guts of these mosquitoes were dissected in normal saline and stained with 2% mercurochrome for examination of oocysts by light microscopy[35]. The remaining parts of the dissected mosquitoes as well as other undissected anophelines were routinely stored in Eppendorf tubes with a small quantity of silica gel. Mosquitoes were subsequently independently tested for circumsporozoite protein (CSP) by ELISA[36] in a central laboratory at Ifakara Health Institute. At each site, a different technician conducted the mosquito dissections and examinations for the presence of oocysts. Laboratory technicians performing the CSP ELISA were blinded to the oocyst status and source of the mosquitoes to avoid possible biases in the determination of sporozoite infection status.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Research Coordination Committee of the National Medical Research Coordination Committee of National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania (Reference number NIMR/HQ/R.8a/VOL.VIII, dated April 2000).

Data analysis

The overall objective of the analysis was to determine the relationship between the introduction of ACT and the infectiousness of the human population, as reflected by infection prevalence in local vector populations. The outcome measures reflecting human-to-mosquito transmission were the infection status of individual mosquitoes, with the primary and secondary effects defined by the presence of oocysts or sporozoites, respectively, within the two study zones. The proportions of mosquitoes with oocysts and sporozoites (the oocyst and sporozoite rates, respectively) were estimated independently for groups of mosquitoes collected before and after the introduction of ACT in the intervention site. Multivariate logistic regression models with terms for study site (intervention versus comparison), period of mosquito collection (pre-intervention versus post-intervention), intervention (availability of ACT versus SP monotherapy), and species of mosquito (An. gambiae s.l. versus An. funestus), were used to assess the impact of the introduction of ACT on oocyst and sporozoite prevalence. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value ≤0.05. All statistical analyses were executed using SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA).

To measure mosquito-to-human malaria transmission intensity, the entomological inoculation rate (EIR) was calculated by multiplying the arithmetic mean mosquito-biting rate per night by the mean sporozoite prevalence for that vector species. EIR was calculated separately for the pre- and post- intervention periods. The biting rate for each mosquito species was obtained by dividing the mean catch of females in CDC light traps by published estimates from the Kilombero Valley of the relative sensitivity of CDC light traps relative to human landing catches of 0.30 and 0.68 for An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus, respectively[37].

Infectiousness of humans to mosquitoes depends on K, the proportion of mosquitoes that are infected at any given feed. This cannot be measured directly, because infected mosquitoes may have received their infections either at the latest, or at a previous feed. There are various algorithms for estimating K from field-caught mosquitoes. All of these require both a measure of the proportions of mosquitoes that are infected, and a measure of the age distribution of the vectors. For the present study, K was estimated from the proportions of host-seeking mosquitoes with oocysts and the proportion that were parous using the following equation[38, 39]:

K O = 1 1 M 1 M R

Where: M is the proportion of parous mosquitoes among those dissected and R is the proportion of dissected mosquitoes with oocysts (the immediate oocyst rate). The standard error of K O was determined as described previously[38].


In Rufiji, 11,883 An. gambiae s.l. and 13,434 An. funestus were sampled before ACT introduction, while 5,826 An. gambiae s.l. and 2,626 An. funestus were sampled after ACT introduction. In the comparison site: Kilombero-Ulanga, 50,694 An. gambiae s.l. and 9,615 An. funestus were sampled before and 27,559 An. gambiae s.l. and 8,381 An. funestus after ACT introduction in Rufiji. The density of anophelines as well as the parous rate varied seasonally and strongly between years (Figures2 and3). Fewer mosquitoes were caught post the intervention in Rufiji, but both 2003 and 2004 were very dry years (Figure4) and this was presumably the main factor affecting mosquito densities.

Figure 2

Anopheles gambiae s.l. density (panels a and e), proportion parous (panels b and f), proportion with oocysts (panels c and f) and proportion with sporozoites (panels d and g) for Kilombero-Ulanga (panels a – d) and Rufiji (panels e – g) districts by month. Horizontal black lines represent observed values, grey bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Subsequent non-missing values are connected by thin black lines.

Figure 3

Anopheles funestus density (panels a and e), proportion parous (panels b and f), proportion with oocysts (panels c and f) and proportion with sporozoites (panels d and g) for Kilombero-Ulanga (panels a – d) and Rufiji (panels e – g) districts by month. Horizontal black lines represent observed values, grey bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Subsequent non-missing values are connected by thin black lines.

Figure 4

Temperature and rainfall for Rufiji for the period of 2002–2004. The bars represent the rainfall per month (left axis), the lines show the monthly maximum (solid line) and minimum temperature (broken line), right axis. Values are based on remote sensing. Rainfall data were obtained from the Africa Data Dissemination Service (ADDS)[53] and temperature data from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration[54].

Oocyst prevalence in Rufiji increased substantially between the pre-intervention and post-intervention period (χ2 = 11.9, p <0.001 for An. gambiae, χ2 = 11.1, p <0.001 for An. funestus) with an odds ratio (estimated from a multivariable logistic regression, allowing for site, species, and time period) of 3.9 [95%CI: 2.9-5.3] (Figure5). However, the confidence intervals for both An. funestus and An. gambiae s.l. oocyst rates were wide (Figures2 and3 respectively) because of the considerable inter-month variation. No significant changes (χ2 = 0.01, p =0.9 for An. gambiae, χ2 = 0.04, p = 0.8 for An. funestus) were observed in Kilombero-Ulanga (Table 1, Figures2,3 and4). Sporozoite prevalence also increased significantly in Rufiji for An. funestus2 = 37.3, p < 0.001), but not for An. gambiae s.l. (χ2 = 0.02, p =0.9) so overall there was little effect (OR [95%CI] = 0.9[0.7-1.2], p = 0.51) (Table 2) while in Kilombero-Ulanga the sporozoite prevalence increased significantly for An. gambiae s.l. (χ2 = 21.6, p <0.001), but not for An. funestus2 = 1.7, p =0.19). These formal statistical comparisons between pre- and post-intervention periods must be viewed cautiously in the context of the considerable seasonal and inter-annual variation in both mosquito densities, and in the numbers of mosquitoes that were analysed for each outcome. The age distribution of the mosquito populations, as indicated by the parous rates, also varied considerably over time, reflecting variations in both mosquito survival and recruitment rate to the vector populations. Environmental variation (Figure4) is probably the main determinant of longitudinal patterns in mosquito bionomics. Because of the profound inter-annual differences we did not attempt to adjust these analyses for seasonality.

Figure 5

Trends in mosquito infection prevalence. Observed trends of mosquito oocyst (a &b) and sporozoite (c &d) prevalence before and after the onset of an artesunate-based effectiveness trial, error bars correspond to 95% confidence interval. A comparison can be made for Anopheles gambiae s.l. (straight line and dark squares) and Anopheles funestus (dotted line, white squares). Panels E & F show the trends in malaria transmission. The shading on the graphs serves to indicate the transition from before and after the addition of AS to SP.

Table 1 Prevalence of mosquitoes infected with oocysts and sporozoites and entomological inoculation rate (EIR) in Rufiji and Kilombero-Ulanga Districts by Anopheline species and time period
Table 2 Factors associated oocyst and sporozoite prevalence in Anopheline vectors in Rufiji and Kilombero-Ulanga Districts, January 2002-July 2004

Mosquito-to-human transmission, as estimated by the EIR, consistently exceeded 300 infective bites per person per year in both sites throughout the study period (Table 1). During both the pre-intervention and post-intervention time periods, the intervention site had the highest proportion of sporozoite-positive mosquitoes and, therefore, the highest EIR. The estimated EIR for both An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus in the intervention site was higher after ACT introduction than before. This coincided with a possible increase in human-to-mosquito transmission implied by the observed increase in oocyst prevalence. In the absence of an increase in prevalence of sporozoites in An. gambiae s.l. it is impossible to draw any firm conclusions about effects on the infectious reservoir, which does not necessarily follow the EIR in endemic settings[39]. One clear conclusion though is that the introduction of ACT was not followed by signs of a decline in human-mosquito transmission.

The estimates of infectiousness of the human population were summarized at the level of the time period (pre- or post-policy change), by site, and by vector species (Table 3). The values of K O were similar for both vector species, both sites and both time periods, with the exception of the pre-intervention values for Rufiji, which were very low. Much of the variation in sporozoite and oocyst prevalence can thus be attributed to variations in mosquito survival, which are accounted for by the term for the parous rate (M) in the formula for K O .

Table 3 Oocyst-based estimates of human infectiousness ( Ko)

The values estimated for K in the literature are extremely variable[39] but few of them are as low as the values measured pre-intervention in Rufiji. The values for Kilombero-Ulanga do not show any indication of a trend over time, and are higher than the pre-intervention Rufiji ones, suggesting that the low values cannot be attributed to the use of SP as treatment. There is no indication that the post-policy change values for Rufiji reduced K below the Kilombero value.


Despite numerous clinical studies demonstrating high cure rates and gametocytocidal effect of artemisinin derivatives[9, 10, 40, 41], there is no evidence that this translates into any measurable impact on malaria transmission intensity at the population level in these Tanzanian sites. Although, the potential to reduce malaria transmission is widely cited, some mathematical models predict only a modest incremental impact of the routine use of ACT over non-gametocytocidal drugs in high transmission settings[19]. This observational study of the impact of routine delivery of ACT via health facilities provides some empirical support for this. Although, the parasitological study found a significant reduction in asexual parasitaemia prevalence following ACT introduction, this reduction was very modest (five percentage-points) and was not reflected in a measurable reduction of gametocytaemia prevalence in the human population[25] . In the present study, the most direct indicator of human-to-mosquito transmission, namely oocyst prevalence, was substantially higher after ACT introduction. It is unclear what caused this increase, particularly since the sporozoite prevalence did not increase at the same time (Table 2), only factors, in particular weather patterns (Figure4) changed considerably between the two periods. Because environmental conditions and availability of mosquitoes for analysis varied erratically throughout the study period, it is not possible to formally separate inter-annual and seasonal variation from effects of the policy change, but the overall conclusion is that any ACT-related reductions in human-to-mosquito or mosquito-to-human transmission in the mosquito population were small.

Overall, these two large-scale, complementary studies of malaria parasite prevalence in both humans and mosquitoes did not detect any epidemiologically meaningful suppression of human population infectiousness following ACT introduction. However, mosquito population dynamics in Rufiji were clearly profoundly affected by variations in rainfall during the study period. Rainfall affects both the emergence rates of vectors, and probably (via effects on humidity) the survival of adult mosquitoes. This does not directly affect the infectiousness of the human population to mosquitoes, but has profound effects on malaria transmission as measured either by the EIR or the oocyst prevalence. The large variations in emergence rates and survival of mosquitoes very likely account for most of the variation in oocyst prevalence, though this cannot explain why infectiousness was so low during the first half of the study (prior to ACT) in Rufiji, or why the oocyst prevalence increased after ACT introduction, while sporozoite prevalence did not. Far fewer mosquitoes were examined for oocysts than sporozoites, and sampling variation thus contributes more to the oocyst data.

The increase in oocyst prevalence thus seems very unlikely to be related to the change in drug policy. Nor is it likely that any substantive change in coverage of bed nets could have contributed to the observed difference in oocyst rates because net ownership and use remained relatively low and stable in Rufiji District until late 2005. There were no major changes in availability of nets in Kilombero-Ulanga during the study period[30].

Although an efficacious ACT with known gametocytocidal properties was deployed and achieved reasonable population level coverage with an estimated 0.6 to 2.2 AS + SP treatments per person per year, the majority of persons receiving treatment with ACT were symptomatic children. Thus, the asymptomatic, chronically infected, semi-immune older children and adults who likely constituted the bulk of the reservoir of gametocytes[23] were relatively untouched by the introduction of ACT for case management. There have even been suggestions of higher infectivity of gametocytes in asymptomatic carriers in comparison to symptomatic cases due to the large quantity of gametocytes in the former group[42]. In areas where the initial level of malaria transmission is relatively low, the ratio of symptomatic to asymptomatic infections is higher, and larger proportionate reductions in transmission may be likely following introduction of ACT[6, 39, 43]. Conversely, in areas of high transmission such as investigated here, ACT may have little impact on prevalence, human population infectiousness and consequent mosquito-to-human transmission because a greater proportion of infections are only mildly symptomatic. Furthermore, even in settings such as these where artemisinins are combined with complementary partner drugs, such as SP which have long-lasting prophylactic effects[19], ACT use may have little impact on overall transmission where it occurs at high intensities simply because individuals often become re-infected within weeks of treatment[1].

ACT might only have a substantial effect on the infectious reservoir if most of the infections are actually being treated with this drug class. The delivery of ACT through public sector outlets in Rufiji rose steadily from 2003 to 2005 with a total of 450,000 doses being deployed for distribution to all registered health facilities by that time[44], corresponding to a mean consumption rate of 2.22 doses per person per year. Adherence among recipients has been estimated at 75%[45], which implies that this drug was delivered reasonably effectively. The proportion of care-seeking visits made to the health facilities that were fever-related rose from 31.8% in 2001 to 54.7% in 2004[46], perhaps due to improved community perceptions, availability and affordability. Recent calls for accurately targeting ACT only to those with patent parasitaemia[47] may, paradoxically, further undercut the potential for case management alone to contribute to transmission reduction in highly endemic settings.

While much emphasis has been placed upon the importance of the gametocytocidal properties of ACT, their most important contribution to lowering human population infectiousness is to terminate otherwise long-lasting infections with asexual stages, which intermittently but persistently generate gametocytes and can infect mosquitoes for over a year[19]. This is comparable to the effect of non-gametocytocidal blood schizonticides. Similarly, the impact of curative drugs upon onward transmission is probably primarily determined by the length of time successfully treated patients remain uninfected and consequently non-infectious, rather than whether that drug kills the relatively short-lived gametocytes already present at the time of administration. Therefore, while an effective cure may reduce human population infectiousness in an area with little transmission, in parts of Africa where it is common to become re-infected within weeks or even days, even regular treatment of symptomatic infections[48, 49] will likely have only a modest effect upon the proportion of people’s lives spent infected and, therefore, on the mean infection prevalence as described[25].


Whilst it is disappointing that no obvious reduction of human infectiousness was evident after introduction of ACT for malaria case management in this first large-area trial in a region of intense transmission, perhaps this is not entirely surprising. Both rapid re-infection and semi-immune, chronically infectious, asymptomatic carriers are common in such settings. The lack of any such secondary benefits in high transmission areas should not detract from the direct public health value of ACT as a means to treat uncomplicated malaria and prevent severe disease manifestations. As has already been outlined in both theory[19] and practice[8, 11], effective chemotherapy with ACT has a vital role in reducing malaria morbidity and mortality. The contribution of chemotherapy to the control and elimination of transmission is likely to be most valuable in settings where transmission is either naturally low or where other approaches such as effective vector control have brought it down to more tractable levels.

There is a need for entomological surveys in parallel to clinical surveillance as a routine component of large-scale trials of anti-malarial drugs or vaccines, but variations in space and time in entomological data should not ignored. Malaria parasite prevalence in vector populations may serve as a useful indicator of the population-wide effect of deployment of interventions that may have only previously been evaluated in individual participants in clinical trials. There is also a need for more cost-effective technologies and procedures for sampling vector mosquito populations across large areas[50, 51] to enable accurate and precise measurement of their infection prevalence.

Finally, although there was no demonstrable impact of introducing ACT free for routine case management without diagnostic confirmation, this should not discourage malaria control programmes and their development partners from rolling out interventions to enhance ACT coverage and improve targeting through existing diagnostic tests. Since the study was conceived, ACT and effective vector control through insecticide-treated bed nets have been scaled up broadly, coinciding with substantial reductions in malaria-related and all-cause child mortality in areas of highly endemic malaria transmission[52]. These findings suggest that untargeted ACT alone may have limited impact on transmission. Endemic countries and their development partners should continue to promote ACT and confirmed diagnosis, but may wish to reconsider their expectations of what effect this may have on malaria transmission. Scaling-up and sustaining effective case management along with proven vector control interventions remains the priority for these areas.



Artemisinin Combination Therapy


Centers for Disease Control


Circumsporozoite Protein


Entomological Inoculation Rate


Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay


The Interdisciplinary Monitoring Project for Antimalarial Combination Therapy


Malaria Transmission Intensity and Mortality Burden Across Africa


National Institute of Medical Research


Sulphadoxine Pyrimethamine.


  1. 1.

    Jeffery GM, Eyles DE: Infectivity to mosquitoes of Plasmodium falciparum as related to gametocyte density and duration of infection. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 1955, 4: 781-789.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bruce MC, Donnelly CA, Packer M, Lagog M, Gibson N, Narara A, Walliker D, Alpers MP, Day KP: Age- and species-specific duration of infection in asymptomatic malaria infections in Papua New Guinea. Parasitology. 2000, 121 (Pt 3): 247-256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sama W, Owusu-Agyei S, Felger I, Vounatsou P, Smith T: An immigration-death model to estimate the duration of malaria infection when detectability of the parasite is imperfect. Stat Med. 2005, 24: 3269-3288. 10.1002/sim.2189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nosten F, van Vugt M, Price R, Luxemburger C, Thway KL, Brockman A, McGready R, ter Kuile F, Looareesuwan S, White NJ: Effects of artesunate-mefloquine combination on incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and mefloquine resistance in western Thailand: a prospective study. Lancet. 2000, 356: 297-302. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02505-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ashley EA, White NJ: Artemisinin-based combinations. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005, 18: 531-536. 10.1097/01.qco.0000186848.46417.6c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Okell LC, Drakeley CJ, Ghani AC, Bousema T, Sutherland CJ: Reduction of transmission from malaria patients by artemisinin combination therapies: a pooled analysis of six randomized trials. Malar J. 2008, 7: 125-10.1186/1475-2875-7-125.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Barnes KI, Durrheim DN, Little F, Jackson A, Mehta U, Allen E, Dlamini SS, Tsoka J, Bredenkamp B, Mthembu DJ, White NJ, Sharp BL: Effect of artemether-lumefantrine policy and improved vector control on malaria burden in KwaZulu-Natal. South Africa. PLoS Med. 2005, 2: e330-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bhattarai A, Ali AS, Kachur SP, Martensson A, Abbas AK, Khatib R, Al-Mafazy AW, Ramsan M, Rotllant G, Gerstenmaier JF, Molteni F, Abdulla S, Montgomery SM, Kaneko A, Bjorkman A: Impact of artemisinin-based combination therapy and insecticide-treated nets on malaria burden in Zanzibar. PLoS Med. 2007, 4: e309-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040309.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Drakeley CJ, Jawara M, Targett GAT, Walraven G, Obisike U, Coleman R, Pinder M, Sutherland CJ: Addition of artesunate to chloroquine for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Gambian children causes a significant but short-lived reduction in infectiousness for mosquitoes. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 53-61. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01169.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sutherland CJ, Ord R, Dunyo S, Jawara M, Drakeley CJ, Alexander N, Coleman R, Pinder M, Walraven G, Targett GA: Reduction of malaria transmission to Anopheles mosquitoes with a six-dose regimen of co-artemether. PLoS Med. 2005, 2: e92-10.1371/journal.pmed.0020092.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Barnes KI, Chanda P, Ab Barnabas G: Impact of the large-scale deployment of artemether/lumefantrine on the malaria disease burden in Africa: case studies of South Africa, Zambia and Ethiopia. Malar J. 2009, 8 (Suppl 1): S8-10.1186/1475-2875-8-S1-S8.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Graves PM, Burkot TR, Carter R, Cattani JA, Lagog M, Parker J, Brabin BJ, Gibson FD, Bradley DJ, Alpers MP: Measurement of malarial infectivity of human populations to mosquitoes in the Madang area, Papua, New Guinea. Parasitology. 1988, 96 (Pt 2): 251-263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Haji H, Smith T, Charlwood JD, Meuwissen JH: Absence of relationships between selected human factors and natural infectivity of Plasmodium falciparum to mosquitoes in an area of high transmission. Parasitology. 1996, 113: 425-431. 10.1017/S0031182000081488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Schneider P, Bousema T, Omar S, Gouagna L, Sawa P, Schallig H, Sauerwein R: (Sub)microscopic Plasmodium falciparum gametocytaemia in Kenyan children after treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine monotherapy or in combination with artesunate. Int J Parasitol. 2006, 36: 403-408. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.01.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bousema JT, Gouagna LC, Drakeley CJ, Meutstege AM, Okech BA, Akim INJ, Beier JC, Githure JI, Sauerwein RW: Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriage in asymptomatic children in western Kenya. Malar J. 2004, 3:

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bousema JT, Schneider P, Gouagna LC, Drakeley CJ, Tostmann A, Houben R, Githure JI, Ord R, Sutherland CJ, Omar SA, Sauerwein RW: Moderate effect of artemisinin-based combination therapy on transmission of Plasmodium falciparum. J Infect Dis. 2006, 193: 1151-1159. 10.1086/503051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ferguson HM, Rivero A, Read AF: The influence of malaria parasite genetic diversity and anaemia on mosquito feeding and fecundity. Parasitology. 2003, 127: 9-19. 10.1017/S0031182003003287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    de Roode JC, Pansini R, Cheesman SJ, Helinski ME, Huijben S, Wargo AR, Bell AS, Chan BH, Walliker D, Read AF: Virulence and competitive ability in genetically diverse malaria infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 7624-7628. 10.1073/pnas.0500078102.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Okell LC, Drakeley CJ, Bousema T, Whitty CJ, Ghani AC: Modelling the impact of artemisinin combination therapy and long-acting treatments on malaria transmission intensity. PLoS Med. 2008, 5: e226-10.1371/journal.pmed.0050226.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mackinnon MJ, Read AF: The effects of host immunity on virulence–transmissibility relationships in the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi. Parasitology. 2003, 126: 103-112. 10.1017/S003118200200272X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lacroix R, Mukabana WR, Gouagna LC, Koella JC: Malaria infection increases attractiveness of humans to mosquitoes. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3: e298-10.1371/journal.pbio.0030298.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mukabana WR, Takken W, Killeen G, Knols BG: Clinical malaria reduces human attractiveness to mosquitoes. Proceedings of the Netherlands Entomological Society Meeting. 2007, 18: 125-129.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ross A, Killeen G, Smith T: Relationships between host infectivity to mosquitoes and asexual parasite density in Plasmodium falciparum. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2006, 75: 32-37.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Graves PM, Burkot TR, Saul AJ, Hayes RJ, Carter R: Estimation of anopheline survival rate, vectorial capacity and mosquito infection probability from malaria vector infection rates in villages near Madang, Papua New Guinea. J Appl Ecol. 1990, 27: 134-146. 10.2307/2403573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Khatib RA, Skarbinksi J, Njau JD, Goodman CA, Elling BF, Kahigwa E, Roberts JM, MacArthur JR, Gutman J, Kabanywanyi AM, Smith EE, Somi MF, Lyimo T, Mwita A, Genton B, Tanner M, Mills A, Mshinda H, Bloland PB, Abdulla S, Kachur SP: Routine delivery of artemisinin-based combination treatment at fixed health facilities reduces malaria prevalence in Tanzania: an observational study. Malar J. 2012, submitted

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mwageni E, Masanja H, Juma Z, Momburi D, Mkilindi Y, Mbuya C, Kasale H, Reid G, de Savigny D: Socio-economic status and health inequities in rural Tanzania: evidence from the Rufiji Demographic Surveillance System. Measuring Health Equity in Small Areas--Findings from Demographic Surveillance Systems. Edited by: Network I. 2005, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, 19-29.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    National Bureau of Statistics: The 2002 Population and Housing Census–General Report. 2003, United Republic of Tanzania, Dar-es-Salaam

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Armstrong-Schellenberg J, Mukasa O, Abdulla S, Marchant T, Lengeler C, Kikumbih N, Mshinda H, Nathan R: Chapter 11: Ifakara DSS, Tanzani. Population and Health in Developing Countries. Volume 1. Edited by: Network I. 2002, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, 159-164.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Killeen GF, Tami A, Kihonda J, Okumu FO, Kotas ME, Grundmann H, Kasigudi N, Ngonyani H, Mayagaya V, Nathan R, Abdulla S, Charlwood JD, Smith TA, Lengeler C: Cost-sharing strategies combining targeted public subsidies with private-sector delivery achieve high bednet coverage and reduced malaria transmission in Kilombero Valley, southern Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 121-10.1186/1471-2334-7-121.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Khatib RA, Killeen GF, Abdulla SM, Kahigwa E, McElroy PD, Gerrets RP, Mshinda H, Mwita A, Kachur SP: Markets, voucher subsidies and free nets combine to achieve high bed net coverage in rural Tanzania. Malar J. 2008, 7: 98-10.1186/1475-2875-7-98.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Abdullah S, Adazu K, Masanja H, Diallo D, Hodgson A, Ilboudo-Sanogo E, Nhacolo A, Owusu-Agyei S, Thompson R, Smith T, Binka FN: Patterns of age-specific mortality in children in endemic areas of sub-Saharan Africa. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2007, 77: 99-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mwageni E, Momburi D, Juma Z, Irema M, Masanja H: Chapter 13: Rufiji DSS, Tanzania. Population and Health in Developing Countries. Volume 1. Edited by: Network I. 2002, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, 173-181.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Schellenberg D, Menendez C, Aponte J, Guinovart C, Mshinda H, Tanner M, Alonso P: The changing epidemiology of malaria in Ifakara Town, southern Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 68-76. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01161.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Magbity EB, Lines JD, Marbiah MT, David K, Peterson E: How reliable are light traps in estimating biting rates of adult Anopheles gambiae s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) in the presence of treated bed nets?. Bull Entomol Res. 2002, 92: 71-76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Haji H, Smith T, Meuwissen JT, Sauerwein RW, Charlwood JD: Estimation of the infectious reservoir of Plasmodium falciparum in natural vector populations based on oocyst size. T Roy Soc Trop Med H. 1996, 90: 494-497. 10.1016/S0035-9203(96)90292-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Burkot TR, Williams JL, Schneider I: Identification of Plasmodium falciparum-infected mosquitoes by a double antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 1984, 33: 783-788.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Okumu FO, Kotas ME, Kihonda J, Mathenge E, Killeen GF, Moore SJ: Comparative evaluation of methods used for sampling malaria vectors in the Kilombero Valley, South Eastern Tanzania. Open Tropical Medicine Journal. 2008, 1: 51-55. 10.2174/1874315300801010051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Charlwood JD, Smith T, Billingsley PF, Takken W, Lyimo EOL, Meuwissen JHET: Survival and infection probabilities of anthropophagic anophelines from an area of high prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum in humans. Bull Entomol Res. 1997, 87: 445-453. 10.1017/S0007485300041304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Killeen GF, Ross A, Smith T: Infectiousness of malaria-endemic human populations to vectors. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2006, 75: 38-45.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Falade C, Makanga M, Premji Z, Ortmann CE, Stockmeyer M, de Palacios PI: Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem) tablets (six-dose regimen) in African infants and children with acute, uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 99: 459-467. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.09.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Yeka A, Banek K, Bakyaita N, Staedke SG, Kamya MR, Talisuna A, Kironde F, Nsobya SL, Kilian A, Slater M, Reingold A, Rosenthal PJ, Wabwire-Mangen F, Dorsey G: Artemisinin versus nonartemisinin combination therapy for uncomplicated malaria: randomized clinical trials from four sites in Uganda. PLoS Med. 2005, 2: e190-10.1371/journal.pmed.0020190.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gouagna LC, Ferguson HM, Okech BA, Killeen GF, Kabiru EW, Beier JC, Githure JI, Yan G: Plasmodium falciparum malaria disease manifestations in humans and transmission to Anopheles gambiae: a field study in Western Kenya. Parasitology. 2004, 128: 235-243. 10.1017/S003118200300444X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    White NJ: The role of anti-malarial drugs in eliminating malaria. Malar J. 2008, 7 (Suppl 1): S8-10.1186/1475-2875-7-S1-S8.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Njau JD, Goodman CA, Kachur SP, Mulligan J, Munkondya JS, McHomvu N, Abdulla S, Bloland P, Mills A: The costs of introducing artemisinin-based combination therapy: evidence from district-wide implementation in rural Tanzania. Malar J. 2008, 7: 4-10.1186/1475-2875-7-4.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kachur SP, Khatib RA, Kaizer E, Fox SS, Abdulla SM, Bloland PB: Adherence to antimalarial combination therapy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and artesunate in rural Tanzania. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2004, 71: 715-722.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kachur SP, Schulden J, Goodman CA, Kassala H, Elling BF, Khatib RA, Causer LM, Mkikima S, Abdulla S, Bloland PB: Prevalence of malaria parasitemia among clients seeking treatment for fever or malaria at drug stores in rural Tanzania 2004. Trop Med Int Health. 2006, 11: 441-451. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01588.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    WHO: Guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria. 2010, World Health Organization, Geneva, Second

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Molineaux L: The pros and cons of modelling malaria transmission. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1985, 79: 743-747. 10.1016/0035-9203(85)90107-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Mugittu K, Genton B, Mshinda H, Beck HP: Molecular monitoring of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin in Tanzania. Malar J. 2006, 5: 126-10.1186/1475-2875-5-126.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kelly-Hope LA, McKenzie FE: The multiplicity of malaria transmission: a review of entomological inoculation rate measurements and methods across sub-Saharan Africa. Malar J. 2009, 8: 19-10.1186/1475-2875-8-19.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Sikulu M, Govella NJ, Ogoma SB, Mpangile J, Kambi SH, Kannady K, Chaki PC, Mukabana WR, Killeen GF: Comparative evaluation of the Ifakara tent trap-B, the standardized resting boxes and the human landing catch for sampling malaria vectors and other mosquitoes in urban Dar es Salaam. Tanzania. Malar J. 2009, 8: 197-

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Roll Back Malaria Partnership: Progress and Impact Series. 2011, Roll Back Malaria Partnership, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Roll Back Malaria Partnership: Roll Back Malaria: A Decade of Progress and Results. Progress and Impact Series. 2011, Roll Back Malaria Partnership, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.


  55. 55.


Download references


The authors wish to acknowledge all the field workers and the community members of the study villages of Kilombero-Ulanga and Rufiji districts. We are grateful to N Kasigudi, H Ngonyani, A Mtandanguo, T Athumani, P Mahunga and E Mrema for technical assistance and Dr H Mshinda for guidance during the design of the study. We also thank Dr O Briët for preparing Figures2 and3. This manuscript is published with the kind permission the Director-General of the National Institute of Medical Research (NIMR), Dr M Malecela.

Financial disclosure

Adult mosquito surveys were partly funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant number 3270-059541-99) and by the Malaria Transmission Intensity and Mortality Burden Across Africa (MTIMBA) project through MIM/TDR and RBM initiatives. GFK was supported by a Wellcome Trust Research Career Development Fellowship (076806) and SPK by the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, USA through the Interdisciplinary Monitoring Programme for Antimalarial Combination Therapy in Tanzania (IMPACT) project. The Interdisciplinary Monitoring Project for Antimalarial Combination Therapy in Tanzania (IMPACT) operated as a multiyear implementation research evaluation platform comprising the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Ifakara Health Institute, the National Institute for Medical Research, Muhimbili University College of Health Sciences, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (UK) and the Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, including its National Malaria Control Programme, the Tanzania Essential Health Interventions Project, and the Council Health Management Teams of Rufiji, Morogoro, Mvomeru, Kilombero and Ulanga Districts. IMPACT was primarily supported by funding from the CDC, United States Agency for International Development. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Patrick Kachur.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors’ contributions

SMKA, TAS, SPK conceived and designed the study. JK and AK led the field data collection. BJH, GFK, TAS, and SMKA analysed and interpreted the data. BJH, GFK, HMF, TAS, SMKA, CL, SPK and JDC drafted the manuscript. GFK, AT, JK and AK provided administrative, technical, and material support. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huho, B.J., Killeen, G.F., Ferguson, H.M. et al. Artemisinin-based combination therapy does not measurably reduce human infectiousness to vectors in a setting of intense malaria transmission. Malar J 11, 118 (2012).

Download citation


  • Malaria
  • Artemisinin-based combination therapy
  • Transmission reduction
  • Malaria