Correlates of HIV and malaria co-infection in Southern India
© Bharti et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 19 June 2012
Accepted: 29 August 2012
Published: 3 September 2012
Malaria and HIV co-infection adversely impact the outcome of both diseases and previous studies have mostly focused on falciparum malaria. Plasmodium vivax contributes to almost half of the malaria cases in India, but the disease burden of HIV and P. vivax co-infection is unclear.
HIV-infected subjects (n=460) were randomly selected from the 4,611 individuals seen at a Voluntary Counseling and Testing Center in Chennai, India between Jan 2 to Dec 31 2008. Malaria testing was performed on stored plasma samples by nested PCR using both genus-specific and species-specific primers and immunochromatography-based rapid diagnostic test for detecting antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax.
Recent malaria co-infection, defined by the presence of antibodies, was detected in 9.8% (45/460) participants. Plasmodium vivax accounted for majority of the infections (60%) followed by P. falciparum (27%) and mixed infections (13%). Individuals with HIV and malaria co-infection were more likely to be men (p=0.01). Between those with and without malaria, there was no difference in age (p=0.14), CD4+ T-cell counts (p=0.19) or proportion CD4+ T-cell below 200/mL (p=0.51).
Retrospective testing of stored plasma samples for malaria antibodies can facilitate identification of populations with high rates of co-infection, and in this southern India HIV-infected cohort there was a considerable burden of malaria co-infection, predominantly due to P. vivax. However, the rate of P. falciparum infection was more than 6-fold higher among HIV-infected individuals than what would be expected in the general population in the region. Interestingly, individuals co-infected with malaria and HIV were not more likely to be immunosuppressed than individuals with HIV infection alone.
HIV, a sexually or parenterally transmitted viral infection, and malaria, a mosquito-borne parasitic disease, are two disparate and deadly diseases that are often brought together by overlapping geographic distributions. When HIV and malaria co-infection occur in the same individual, both diseases are adversely impacted. HIV-infected individuals are at increased risk of: acquiring malaria  developing severe malarial disease [2, 3], recrudescing malaria symptoms , and experiencing treatment failure of malaria . Additionally, acute malaria is associated with an increase in HIV viral load  and a steeper decline in CD4 cell count , and these viral load and CD4 count changes can take several weeks to recover after successful malaria therapy . These interactions may facilitate spread of both diseases . These observations have largely been made in the setting of HIV co-infection with Plasmodium falciparum in sub-Saharan Africa. Much less is known whether Plasmodium vivax has similar interactions with HIV. Therefore, this study was conducted to: i) determine the prevalence and risk factors of malaria co-infection in a cohort of HIV-infected individuals in southern India, a region with predominantly P. vivax malaria and ii) evaluate the strategy of using stored specimens for quick retrospective assessment of populations for co-infection burden.
The subjects were randomly selected (10%) from the 4,611 HIV-1 positive individuals seen at the Voluntary Counseling and Testing center of Y. R. Gaitonde Center for AIDS Research and Education (YRGCARE) between Jan 2, 2008 and December 31, 2008. They were all newly diagnosed with HIV-1 infection and were not receiving antiretroviral therapy. The study was approved by the ethics boards of the University of California San Diego, YRGCARE, and the Indian Council of Medical Research. All volunteers provided written informed consent. Blood samples were processed immediately following collection and plasma stored in −70°C freezer for a period ranging from 18 to 24 months before being evaluated in the current study.
HIV and CD4+ T-cell count
Blood (6 mL) was collected in EDTA tubes (catalog no. 367861, BD, USA) and plasma separated after centrifugation at 2,500 RPM for 12 min. Tests for diagnosing HIV were either Determine HIV 1/2 test (Abbott Laboratories), Signal HIV Rapid Test (Span Diagnostics Ltd., India), or First Response HIV 1–2.0 (PMC Medical Pvt. Ltd., India). CD4+ T-cell counts were determined by flow cytometric panLeukogating method (Beckman Coulter, USA).
Primers for nested PCR of Plasmodium 18S rRNA gene
Size of PCR product (bp)
Malaria antibody testing
An immunochromatography-based rapid diagnostic test kit, SD BIOLINE Malaria Pf/Pv Kit (Catalog No. 05FK30I-IN-02, SD Bio Standard Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd., India), was used for detecting antibodies (IgG, IgM, IgA) against merozoite surface protein (MSP) of both P. falciparum and P. vivax. Each of the 460 plasma samples was tested individually for malaria antibodies. Blood smears were not available for examination by microscopy.
Student t-test was used for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables (IBM SPSS Statistics Version 19). Non-parametric test, Mann–Whitney U test, was used where appropriate. One-way ANOVA was done to compare characteristics of the 3 malaria positive subgroups.
Demographic characteristics of the study cohort
Mean age, y (±SD)
38 ± 9
40 ± 9
Gender (Number (%) men)
CD4+ cell count
222 (89, 403)
244 (140, 571)
Proportion below 200/μL
In India, the potential for intersection of malaria and HIV epidemics is great but data on co-infections are sparse. Two studies, one conducted in Chennai and the other in Mumbai, have identified co-infected individuals in hospital-based settings [12, 13]. However, this study is more representative of the community and is the first one to demonstrate a high P. vivax co-infection rate. The majority of the infections in this HIV-infected cohort were due to P. vivax (60%), which is similar to that in the general population in the state of Tamil Nadu . In contrast, compared to the general population , the co-infected cohort had a lower proportion of P. vivax (60% vs. 96%); higher proportion of P. falciparum (27% vs. 4%); and a considerable number of mixed infections (13%). The higher prevalence of falciparum malaria in HIV-infected individuals has implications for clinical management. Incorrect identification of Plasmodium species can lead to inappropriate malaria treatment because chloroquine is still the first-line treatment for P. vivax, but would be ineffective for falciparum malaria due to high prevalence of chloroquine resistance .
There was a preponderance of men (80%) with a mean age of 40 ± 9 years in the co-infected group, which mirrors the trend seen in the general population . The high prevalence of malaria co-infection in men may be related to occupation and travel that puts them at an increased risk of being bitten by infected mosquitoes and needs to be investigated further. Interestingly, this study did not find an association between lower CD4+ T-cell count and malaria co-infection. This is in contrast to other studies where subclinical and symptomatic falciparum malaria was more common in HIV-infected compared with HIV-uninfected individuals and the risk increased with advancing immunosuppression [1, 18, 19]. Malaria in this cohort was mainly due to P. vivax and it is speculated that immunosuppression due to HIV may not increase the risk of vivax malaria co-infection, but more studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Malaria diagnosis was made by detection of malaria antibodies by the SD BIOLINE kit. Although, its sensitivity is much lower than microscopy or nested PCR and ranges from 47% to 69% [20, 21], this method is well suited to detect malaria prevalence in low endemic areas [22, 23]. The anti-MSP antibodies measured have very short half-lives (9.8 days)  that peak by day 7 and are cleared by day 28 . In the absence of repeated infections in a region with unstable malaria transmission, this suggests that malaria infection in this co-infected group was recent, probably within a range of 1-4 weeks. Although data on symptoms or malaria treatment history was not collected, it is presumed that subjects were asymptomatic as they were seen in a HIV testing center and not a treatment clinic. No parasite DNA was detected using PCR-based methods. There could be several explanations for this. First, parasite DNA in stored plasma samples may have degraded. This is unlikely, as the authors have earlier shown that PCR is able to detect Plasmodium DNA in serum samples frozen up to 2½ years . The current samples were more recent (less than 2 years old) and better preserved (stored at −70°C). Another point supporting specimen integrity is the presence of amplifiable human DNA in 93% of selected samples. Second, parasite DNA levels may be below the detection limit of PCR. Although, the sensitivity of the nested PCR method is high and ranges from 0.5-1 parasite/μL [27, 28], plasma samples can have PCR yield up to 3-fold lower than whole blood . Another reason for low parasitaemia levels is the high likelihood of subclinical infection among the participants. Real-time PCR may have a higher  or similar [21, 27] sensitivity compared with nested PCR. Longitudinal data is lacking to confirm whether some individuals went on to develop symptomatic malaria or detectable parasite DNA. Further, tests were done only for P. falciparum and P. vivax, the two predominant Plasmodium species in the region and may have missed infections caused by other spp. like Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae although their contribution is unlikely given the antibody results.
Taken together, although malaria antibody test cannot be used to make a clinical diagnosis, it is a preferred method for retrospective malaria prevalence studies in regions with unstable malaria transmission, as in this study region.
The authors disclose no conflict of interest related to the manuscript. This research was supported by a grant from the University of California, San Diego, Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), an NIH-funded programme (P30 AI036214), which is supported by the following NIH Institutes and Centers: NIAID, NCI, NIMH, NIDA, NICHD, NHLBI, NIA (PI: DMS; Co-PI: NK); ARB is supported by a K23 award from the National Institute of Mental Health (1K23MH085512-01A2).
- Patnaik P, Jere CS, Miller WC, Hoffman IF, Wirima J, Pendame R, Meshnick SR, Taylor TE, Molyneux ME, Kublin JG: Effects of HIV-1 serostatus, HIV-1 RNA concentration, and CD4 cell count on the incidence of malaria infection in a cohort of adults in rural Malawi. J Infect Dis. 2005, 192: 984-991. 10.1086/432730.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen C, Karstaedt A, Frean J, Thomas J, Govender N, Prentice E, Dini L, Galpin J, Crewe-Brown H: Increased prevalence of severe malaria in HIV-infected adults in South Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 41: 1631-1637. 10.1086/498023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grimwade K, French N, Mbatha DD, Zungu DD, Dedicoat M, Gilks CF: HIV infection as a cofactor for severe falciparum malaria in adults living in a region of unstable malaria transmission in South Africa. AIDS. 2004, 18: 547-554. 10.1097/00002030-200402200-00023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Geertruyden JP, Mulenga M, Mwananyanda L, Chalwe V, Moerman F, Chilengi R, Kasongo W, Van Overmeir C, Dujardin JC, Colebunders R, Kestens L, D'Alessandro U: HIV-1 immune suppression and antimalarial treatment outcome in Zambian adults with uncomplicated malaria. J Infect Dis. 2006, 194: 917-925. 10.1086/507310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamya MR, Gasasira AF, Yeka A, Bakyaita N, Nsobya SL, Francis D, Rosenthal PJ, Dorsey G, Havlir D: Effect of HIV-1 infection on antimalarial treatment outcomes in Uganda: a population-based study. J Infect Dis. 2006, 193: 9-15. 10.1086/498577.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kublin JG, Patnaik P, Jere CS, Miller WC, Hoffman IF, Chimbiya N, Pendame R, Taylor TE, Molyneux ME: Effect of plasmodium falciparum malaria on concentration of HIV-1-RNA in the blood of adults in rural Malawi: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2005, 365: 233-240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mermin J, Lule JR, Ekwaru JP: Association between malaria and CD4 cell count decline among persons with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006, 41: 129-130. 10.1097/01.qai.0000179427.11789.a7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Raddad LJ, Patnaik P, Kublin JG: Dual infection with HIV and malaria fuels the spread of both diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. Science. 2006, 314: 1603-1606. 10.1126/science.1132338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Jarra W, Thaithong S, Brown KN: Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the polymerase chain reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infections. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993, 58: 283-292. 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90050-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bharti AR, Letendre SL, Patra KP, Vinetz JM, Smith DM: Malaria diagnosis by a polymerase chain reaction-based assay using a pooling strategy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 81: 754-757. 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.09-0274.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi SR, Datar R, Liu C, Wu L, Zhang Z, Cote RJ, Taylor CR: DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: heat-induced retrieval in alkaline solution. Histochem Cell Biol. 2004, 122: 211-218. 10.1007/s00418-004-0693-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shankarkumar U, Shankarkumar A, Ghosh K: HIV and malaria co-infection in Mumbai, Western India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2011, 48: 155-158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muthu M, Kumaar S: Study of malaria and HIV co-infection in Southern India. 3rd international AIDS society conference on HIV pathogenesis and treatment: 2005. 2005, Rio de Janiero: International AIDS SocietyGoogle Scholar
- Kumar A, Valecha N, Jain T, Dash AP: Burden of malaria in India: retrospective and prospective view. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 77 (6 Suppl): 69-78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malaria Situation in India:http://www.nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/mal-situation-June12.pdf,
- National drug policy on malaria:http://nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/drug-policy-2010.pdf,
- Valecha N, Joshi H, Eapen A, Ravinderan J, Kumar A, Prajapati SK, Ringwald P: Therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine in plasmodium vivax from areas with different epidemiological patterns in India and their Pvdhfr gene mutation pattern. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 100: 831-837. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.11.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitworth J, Morgan D, Quigley M, Smith A, Mayanja B, Eotu H, Omoding N, Okongo M, Malamba S, Ojwiya A: Effect of HIV-1 and increasing immunosuppression on malaria parasitaemia and clinical episodes in adults in rural Uganda: a cohort study. Lancet. 2000, 356: 1051-1056. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02727-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- French N, Nakiyingi J, Lugada E, Watera C, Whitworth JA, Gilks CF: Increasing rates of malarial fever with deteriorating immune status in HIV-1-infected Ugandan adults. AIDS. 2001, 15: 899-906. 10.1097/00002030-200105040-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeremiah ZA, Uko EK, Buseri FI, Jeremiah TA: Field evaluation of SD bioline rapid malaria diagnostic test among asymptomatic malaria infected children in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Res J Parasitol. 2007, 2: 39-44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lima GF, Levi JE, Geraldi MP, Sanchez MC, Segurado AA, Hristov AD, Inoue J, Costa-Nascimento Mde J, Di Santi SM: Malaria diagnosis from pooled blood samples: comparative analysis of real-time PCR, nested PCR and immunoassay as a platform for the molecular and serological diagnosis of malaria on a large-scale. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011, 106: 691-700. 10.1590/S0074-02762011000600008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee WJ, Kim HH, Hwang SM, Park MY, Kim NR, Cho SH, In TS, Kim JY, Sattabongkot J, Sohn Y: Detection of an antibody against plasmodium vivax in residents of Gimpo-si, South Korea, using an indirect fluorescent antibody test. Malar J. 2011, 10: 19-10.1186/1475-2875-10-19.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duo-Quan W, Lin-Hua T, Zhen-Cheng G, Xiang Z, Man-Ni Y: Application of the indirect fluorescent antibody assay in the study of malaria infection in the Yangtze river three gorges reservoir, China. Malar J. 2009, 8: 199-10.1186/1475-2875-8-199.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinyanjui SM, Conway DJ, Lanar DE, Marsh K: IgG antibody responses to plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens in Kenyan children have a short half-life. Malar J. 2007, 6: 82-10.1186/1475-2875-6-82.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woodberry T, Minigo G, Piera KA, Hanley JC, de Silva HD, Salwati E, Kenangalem E, Tjitra E, Coppel RL, Price RN, Anstey NM, Plebanski M: Antibodies to plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein 5 in Indonesia: species-specific and cross-reactive responses. J Infect Dis. 2008, 198: 134-142. 10.1086/588711.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bharti AR, Patra KP, Chuquiyauri R, Kosek M, Gilman RH, Llanos-Cuentas A, Vinetz JM: Polymerase chain reaction detection of plasmodium vivax and plasmodium falciparum DNA from stored serum samples: implications for retrospective diagnosis of malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 77: 444-446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gama BE, Silva-Pires Fdo E, Lopes MN, Cardoso MA, Britto C, Torres KL, de Mendonca Lima L, de Souza JM, Daniel-Ribeiro CT, Ferreira-da-Cruz Mde F: Real-time PCR versus conventional PCR for malaria parasite detection in low-grade parasitemia. Exp Parasitol. 2007, 116: 427-432. 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.02.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Zhu XP, Jarra W, Pinheiro L, do Rosario VE, Thaithong S, Brown KN: High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993, 61: 315-320. 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90077-B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lamikanra AA, Dobano C, Jimenez A, Nhabomba A, Tsang HP, Guinovart C, Manaca MN, Quinto L, Aguilar R, Cistero P, Alonso PL, Roberts DJ, Mayor A: A direct comparison of real time PCR on plasma and blood to detect plasmodium falciparum infection in children. Malar J. 2012, 11: 201-10.1186/1475-2875-11-201.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Genc A, Eroglu F, Koltas IS: Detection of plasmodium vivax by nested PCR and real-time PCR. Korean J Parasitol. 2010, 48: 99-103. 10.3347/kjp.2010.48.2.99.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.