Open Access

Status of potential Pf ATP6 molecular markers for artemisinin resistance in Suriname

  • Malti R Adhin1Email author,
  • Mergiory Labadie-Bracho2 and
  • Stephen G Vreden3
Malaria Journal201211:322

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-322

Received: 14 May 2012

Accepted: 6 September 2012

Published: 11 September 2012

Abstract

Background

Polymorphisms within the PfATP6 gene have been indicated as potential molecular markers for artemisinin efficacy. Since 2004, the use of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) was introduced as first-line treatment of the uncomplicated malaria cases in Suriname. The aim of this research was to determine changes in Suriname in the status of the polymorphic markers in the PfATP6 gene before and after the adoption of the ACT-regimen, particularly of the S769N mutation, which was reported to be associated with in vitro Artemether resistance in the neighboring country French Guiana.

Methods

The PfATP6 gene from Plasmodium falciparum parasites in Suriname was investigated in 28 samples using PCR amplification and restriction enzyme analysis, to assess and determine the prevalence of potentially interesting single nucleotide polymorphisms. The polymorphisms [L263E; A623E; S769N], which may be associated with the artemisinin resistant phenotype were characterized in parasites from three endemic regions before and after the adoption of the ACT-regimen. In addition, the status of these molecular markers was compared in paired P. falciparum isolates from patients with recurring malaria after controlled ACT.

Results

All the investigated samples exhibit the wild-type genotype at all three positions; L263, A623, S769.

Conclusion

All investigated isolates before and after the adoption of the ACT-regimen and independent of endemic region harbored the wild-type genotype for the three investigated polymorphisms. The study revealed that decreased artemisinin susceptibility could occur independent from PfATP6 mutations, challenging the assumption that artemisinin resistance is associated with these mutations in the PfATP6 gene.

Background

Artemisia annua extracts have been used for centuries in traditional Chinese medicine, to treat febrile illnesses including malaria. Currently, artemisinin, isolated from the plant Artemisia annua and its synthetic derivatives are worldwide the most potent and rapidly acting anti-malarials. In 2003, the WHO recommended the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) [1].

Parasite resistance, especially of Plasmodium falciparum, has been recorded to every utilized anti-malarial drug [2], which calls for a diligent monitoring of emerging artemisinin resistance in any malaria endemic area especially in light of the large parasite populations increasingly being exposed to artemisinins worldwide and the actual development of artemisinin resistance in Western Cambodia [3] and Thailand [4]. Various independent experimental approaches corroborate the emerging of artemisinin resistance: reports of cure rates below 75% after artemether-lumefantrine treatment in Cambodia [5]; the production of artemisinin-resistant strains in vivo in the rodent malaria model Plasmodium yoelii[6]; the selection of genetically stable and transmissible parasites resistant to artemisinin and artesunate in P. chabaudi chabaudi[7] and the observation of in vitro resistance to Artemether in isolates from French Guiana [8] and in travelers returning from sub-Saharan Africa [9].

These observations demonstrate that malaria parasites are not only genetically and biologically capable of sustaining stable resistance to artemisinins, but also that this resistance can be selected through drug pressure.

Resistance to the anti-malarial drugs pyrimethamine, sulphadoxine and chloroquine is associated with specific mutations in the pfdhfr, pfdhps and pfcrt gene, respectively. However, there is considerable controversy on the notion of mutations responsible for the emerging resistance to the class of artemisinin derived anti-malarial drugs. Various individual molecules such as haem, catalase, SERCA type enzymes have been proposed as targets for artemisinins. Several observations suggest that artemisinins inhibit the P. falciparum sarco–endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA), encoded by the gene denoted PfATP6[10]. SERCA is a key metabolic enzyme, which reduces the cytosolic free calcium concentration.

Additional evidence that resistance to artemisinins may depend on single mutations in the SERCA-type Ca2+ ATPase was derived from a structure-function investigation, identifying a potential hydrophobic interaction between Leu263 of malarial SERCA’s with a side chain of artemisinin derivatives [11] and several studies of in vitro resistance to Artemether. In Senegal, one isolate was a Pf ATPase6 E431K/A623E double mutant [8], in sub Saharan Africa, isolates were linked to the A623E/S769N haplotype [9] and in Suriname’s neighboring country French Guiana alongside the border Maroni river, an association with the S769N substitution was revealed [8]. On the other hand, in vivo artemisinin resistance could not be linked to mutations in the PfATP6 gene in clinical isolates from Cambodia [12].

The artemether-lumefantrine combination (Coartem®) was introduced in Suriname as the first-line treatment of malaria in January 2004 as part of an elaborate effort to strengthen the national malaria programme.

An active trans-border migration, especially of gold miners with high mobility and frequent use of counterfeit drugs, exists between Suriname and neighboring French Guiana, where in vitro resistance to Artemether was observed [8]. Although no in vivo resistance to artemisinin derivatives or ACT had been reported from French Guiana and artemisinin resistance was not yet clinically documented in Suriname, the circumstances called for an investigation of the potential emergence of artemisinin resistance in accordance with the WHO recommendations ‘to take urgent action to protect the efficacy of ACT’ [13].

A retrospective molecular survey was conducted to assess the status of three possible PfATP6 molecular markers for artemisinin resistance in clinical isolates collected in the three leading endemic regions in Suriname, including the border region with French Guiana. Parasites from two different time periods in Suriname were used to gain insight in the status of the PfATP6 gene prior to and after the introduction of ACT as first line anti-malarial drug. Furthermore, these polymorphisms of the PfATP6 gene were analyzed in paired isolates from patients with recurring malaria after controlled ACT therapy.

Methods

Study site

Suriname is located along the North Coast of South America, bordering French Guiana to the east, Guyana to the west and Brazil to the south. Suriname has a population of 492.829 people (50.3% male; 49.7% female), with 49.3% living in the coastal area in and around the capital Paramaribo [14]. A savannah belt separates the narrow coastal region from the tropical rainforest of the interior, which covers 80% of the country. Malaria transmission is only observed in the interior where 9.8% of the population lives in small Maroon or Amerindian settlements.

Since the 1990s, small gold mining activities in the interior attracted about 15,000 miners mostly from Brazil and French Guiana, substantially increasing the people at risk for malaria infection.

Anopheles darlingi is the predominant vector for malaria transmission and P. falciparum Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium malariae are the circulating species. In 2004, the country implemented a strengthened malaria programme with several measures, such as introduction of an ACT regimen, distribution of long-lasting impregnated nets (LLINs), use of mobile units in the mining areas and active case detection, which resulted in a spectacular decrease of 14,403 malaria cases in 2003 to 1,371 cases in 2009 [15].

Study population

Within two independent anti-malarial drug efficacy studies, Dried Blood Spots (DBS) were collected from consenting positive patients from diverse age groups with microscopically confirmed, uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. Random selections of these DBS were used for this study, 10 samples collected in 2002 and 10 samples collected in 2005. Samples were from different villages in three geographically diverse endemic regions in Suriname (Marowijne, Boven Suriname and Brokopondo).

Additionally, testing was performed on four paired filters (three from Marowijne, the border area with French Guiana) from all patients in the latter study with recurring malaria within 42 days after controlled use of ACT. The observed ACT treatment failure rate was 4.6% (n = 87) [16]. DBS from day 0 and day 42 were tested.

DNA isolation, amplification, restriction analysis and recrudescence methods

DNA was isolated from DBS on filter paper using a modified Saponin-Chelex extraction method [17]. Primary amplification of PfATP6 regions was followed by nested PCR with mutation specific primers to identify potential polymorphisms for both the A623E and L263E position.

For the S769N position, the flanking DNA was amplified with specifically designed primers containing an artificially introduced mismatch to generate a restriction site (Afl II) for the wild-type form of the two alternative alleles for position 769. Substitutions at position S769N were subsequently distinguished through enzyme digestion with Afl II. Primer sequences and PCR programs are described in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

Primer Sequences for PfATP6 codons 263, 623 and 769

Genomic region

Primer Name

Primer Sequence

PfATP6 Codon 263

263P1

5'-CTCCCGCTGATGCAAG-3'

263P2

5'-CCATGAATTGGATCTG-3'

263 N1

5'-CAGTTGACAAATATGCTG-3'

263WT

5'-GATAATTGTTGACCAAATA-3'

263 M

5'-GATAATTGTTGACCAAATG-3'

PfATP6 Codon 623 and 769

ATP1

5'-GGGTATCAACAAATTC-3'

ATP2

5'-CTTCAAATTCTCTTCC-3'

623WT

5'-TATACTACAGCTCAGGC-3'

623 M

5'-TATACTACAGCTCAGGA-3'

623 N2

5'-ACACTCATAAGTTTCC-3'

769 N1

5'-ACTTAGCTTTGCTTATAAAAACTTAA-3'

769 N2

5'-AATTATCCTTTTCATCATCTCC-3'

Original primer sequences from P. Cravo (personal communication).

Table 2

PCR programs for PfATP6 codons 263, 623 and 769

PfATP6 Codon

PCR

Temp.

Time

N. of cycles

Primers

263

1 st round PCR

92 °C

3 min

1 cycle

263P1 and 263P2

92 °C

30 sec

30 cycles

47 °C

45 sec

65 °C

1 min

68 °C

5 min

1 cycle

4 °C

Hold

1 cycle

2 nd round PCR

95 °C

3 min

1 cycle

263WT and 263 N1* 263 M and 263 N1

95 °C

45 sec

20 cycles

62 °C

1 min

72 °C

1 min

72 °C

10 min

1 cycle

4 °C

Hold

1 cycle

623-769

1 st round PCR

94 °C

5 min

1 cycle

ATP1 and ATP2

94 °C

30 sec

45 cycles

44 °C

45 sec

68 °C

1 min

68 °C

5 min

1 cycle

4 °C

Hold

1 cycle

623

2 nd round PCR

94 °C

5 min

1 cycle

623WT and 623 N2* 623 M and 623 N2

94 °C

30 sec

20 cycles

40 °C

45 sec

68 °C

1 min

70 °C

5 min

1 cycle

4 °C

Hold

1 cycle

769

2 nd round PCR

94 °C

5 min

1 cycle

769 N1 and 769 N2

94 °C

30 sec

25 cycles

56 °C

45 sec

68 °C

1 min

68 °C

5 min

1 cycle

4 °C

Hold

1 cycle

(*) Second round PCR for codon 263 and 623 were performed in single reactions with either the wild type (WT) or mutant (M) primer.

Recrudescence analysis and repeat number polymorphisms assessment for the four paired filters consisted of a first round PCR, followed by nested PCR for the genes GLURP, MSP-1 and MSP-2 [18, 19]. Sequence polymorphisms in MSP-1 and MSP-2 were investigated through restriction analysis with Alu I, Hinf I, Dde I, Scrf I and Rsa I.

For all PCRs, lack of cross-contamination was monitored by the inclusion of negative control samples in each PCR-run, while the consistency of the PCR-results was confirmed through duplicate analysis of random control samples. Amplified or digested DNA products were separated through electrophoresis of polyacrylamide slab gels or horizontal agarose gels. Repeat number analysis or restriction patterns were analyzed on either high-resolution agarose or polyacrylamide slab gels in the presence of a molecular weight ladder. DNA was detected with UV-illumination after staining with ethidium bromide. Restriction efficacy in case of uncut products was monitored by the inclusion of positive control samples, which had to be completely digested, in order to convincingly ascribe “uncut” restriction patterns to the absence of the examined restriction site.

Results

Polymorphisms in the PfATP6 gene, encoding the SERCA-type Plasmodium falciparum sarco–endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase, were assessed in 28 samples derived from patients with microscopically confirmed uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, from three different endemic regions.

Sufficient DNA was recovered for all 28 samples and single nucleotide polymorphic assays were successfully performed for all three amino acid positions 263, 623 and 769.

The four paired samples of patients with recurring malaria after controlled treatment were all indeed recrudescent malaria isolates, as was demonstrated with repeat number and recrudescence analysis.

Position Leu263, was unaltered in all 28 investigated samples and none of the isolates displayed the A623E mutant genotype or the S769N mutation. It should be noted that even the recrudescent samples obtained in the border area with French Guiana still exhibited the wild-type S769 haplotype.

Discussion

All 28 isolates exhibited an identical genotype for the three investigated positions. No changes could be detected either in samples obtained from geographical different regions or in samples collected prior to or after adopting an ACT regimen. However, all results should be regarded as indications since the sample size was small and an 18-24 months period is rather brief to exert selection pressure. The absence of the S769N mutation in clinical isolates corroborates the finding from neighboring Brazil, suggesting that the mutant S769N haplotype has probably not yet spread regionally [20].

An important finding is the observed in vivo decreased artemisinin susceptibility, as attested by recrudescent malaria despite monitored treatment, independent of the A623E, L263E and S769N mutations. Although the sample size was small, the results do not favor a direct association between these single nucleotide polymorphisms and resistance to artemisinin, which is supported by research on the P. chabaudi chabaudi ATP6 sequence revealing no nucleotide changes following selection with artesunate or artemisinin [7].

These results are also consistent with independent investigations conducted in Tanzania [21] and other African [22] and Asian [12] countries, where polymorphisms of PfATP6 could not be linked to artemisinin resistance, but are in contrast with the findings in travelers returning from sub-Saharan Africa [9], where the A623E/S769N haplotype was linked to in vitro Artemether resistance. Although several samples were collected alongside the Maroni border river and even with the recurring malaria isolates originating from this area, the results from neighboring French Guiana where the S769N mutation was reported to be associated with in vitro Artemether resistance [8], could not be substantiated.

The finding that generation of artemisinin resistant P. chabaudi chabaudi clones failed in chloroquine sensitive clones and was only successful in chloroquine resistant clones [23] did not confound the results, since all investigated clones were resistant to chloroquine [Adhin, unpublished results].

In the light of accumulating evidence of artemisinin resistance slowly emerging worldwide, diligent surveillance is needed to monitor susceptibility to artemisinin derivatives in endemic areas and these results underscore the search for more appropriate molecular markers. The determination of pfmdr1 copy number and single nucleotide polymorphisms in pfmdr1 alongside PfATP6 analysis might be helpful, since conflicting reports exist about the association of increased pfmdr1 copy number and reduced susceptibility not only to Mefloquine, but also to artemisinin [9, 12, 24]. The use of other screening methods as monitoring parasitaemia should be considered.

Conclusion

This report presents the first data for Suriname on single nucleotide PfATP6 polymorphisms, potentially associated with artemisinin resistance. Isolates obtained prior to or after adopting Coartem® as first-line regimen do not exhibit any mutations at the investigated polymorphisms since all the investigated samples from Suriname harbor the wild-type genotype at all three positions; L263E, A623E, S769N. The findings in French Guiana regarding the S769N mutation could not be substantiated, despite the geographic vicinity. The occurrence of malaria relapses after controlled ACT without altering the Pf ATP6 genotype at the investigated positions, proved the possibility of decrease of artemisinin susceptibility independent of these mutations in the PfATP6 gene.

Abbreviations

ACT: 

Artemisinin Combination Therapy

DNA: 

Deoxyribonucleic Acid

DBS: 

Dried Blood Spots

GLURP: 

P. falciparum glutamate-rich protein (GLURP)

LLIN: 

Long-lasting impregnated nets

MSP-1: 

Plasmodium falciparum merozoite specific protein

MSP-2: 

Plasmodium falciparum merozoite specific protein 2

PCR: 

Polymerase Chain Reaction

Pf ATP6 Plasmodium falciparum

Ca2+ -ATPase protein

PfATP6 Plasmodium falciparum Ca

2+ -ATPase coding gene

pfcrt Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter

coding gene

pfdhfr Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase

coding gene

pfdhps Plasmodium falciparum dihydropteroate synthase

coding gene

pfmdr1 Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance protein 1

coding gene

Pf MDR1Plasmodium falciparum

multidrug resistance protein 1

RAVREDA: 

La Red Amazónica de Vigilancia de la Resistencia a los Antimaláricos (The Amazon Network for the Surveillance of Antimalarial Drug Resistance)

SERCA: 

Sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ - ATPase

WHO: 

World Health Organization.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Ms. Jenilee Kartowidjojo for laboratory assistance and Dr. Pedro Cravo for providing the primer sequences.

This study was supported by USAID through the Amazon Malaria Initiative (AMI) and The Amazon Network for Surveillance of Antimalarial Resistance (RAVREDA)/PAHO-WHO Suriname (SU/LOA 0700003.001). Research was conducted at the “Prof. Dr. Paul C. Flu” Institute for Biomedical Sciences in Paramaribo, Suriname.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Anton de Kom Universiteit van Suriname
(2)
“Prof. Dr. Paul C Flu” Institute for Biomedical Sciences
(3)
Academic Hospital Paramaribo

References

  1. WHO: Position of WHO’s Roll Back Malaria Department on Malaria Treatment Policy. 2003, World Health Organization, www.emro.who.int/RBM/WHOPositionStatement.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. Wongsrichanalai C, Pickard AL, Wernsdorfer WH, Meshnick SR: Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002, 2: 209-218. 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00239-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, Lwin KM, Ariey F, Hanpithakpong W, Lee SJ, Ringwald P, Silamut K, Imwong M, Chotivanich K, Lim P, Herdman T, An SS, Yeung S, Singhasivanon P, Day NPJ, Lindegardh N, Socheat D, White NJ: Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 455-467. 10.1056/NEJMoa0808859.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Phyo AP, Nkhoma S, Stepniewska K, Ashley EA, Nair S, McGready R, Ler Moo C, Al-Saai S, Dondorp AM, Lwin KM, Singhasivanon P, Day NP, White NJ, Anderson TJ, Nosten F: Emergence of artemisinin-resistant malaria on the western border of Thailand: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2012, 379: 1960-1966. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60484-X.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Denis MB, Tsuyuoka R, Lim P, Lindegardh N, Yi P, Top SN, Socheat D, Fandeur T, Annerberg A, Christophel EM, Ringwald P: Efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in northwest Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health. 2006, 11: 1800-1807. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01739.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Walker DJ, Pitsch JL, Peng MM, Robinson BL, Peters W, Bhisutthibhan J, Meshnick SR: Mechanisms of artemisinin resistance in the rodent malaria pathogen Plasmodium yoelii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000, 44: 344-347. 10.1128/AAC.44.2.344-347.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Afonso A, Hunt P, Cheesman S, Alves AC, Cunha CV, Do Rosário V, Cravo P: Malaria parasites can develop stable resistance to artemisinin but lack mutations in candidate genes atp6 (encoding the sarcoplasmic and endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase), tctp, mdr1, and cg10. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50: 480-489. 10.1128/AAC.50.2.480-489.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jambou R, Legrand E, Niang M, Khim N, Lim P, Volney B, Ekala MT, Bouchier C, Esterre P, Fandeur T: Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum field isolates to in-vitro artemether and point mutations of the SERCA-type PfATPase6. Lancet. 2005, 366: 1960-1963. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67787-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pillai DR, Lau R, Khairnar K, Lepore R, Via A, Staines HM, Krishna S: Artemether resistance in vitro is linked to mutations in PfATP6 that also interact with mutations in PfMDR1 in travellers returning with Plasmodium falciparum infections. Malar J. 2012, 11: 131-10.1186/1475-2875-11-131.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckstein-Ludwig U, Webb RJ, van Goethem IDA, East JM, Lee AG, Kimura M, O’Neill PM, Bray PG, Ward SA, Krishna S: Artemisinins target the SERCA of Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2003, 424: 957-961. 10.1038/nature01813.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Uhlemann A-C, Cameron A, Eckstein-Ludwig U, Fischbarg J, Iserovich P, Zuniga FA, East M, Lee A, Brady L, Haynes RK, Krishna S: A single amino acid residue can determine the sensitivity of SERCAs to artemisinins. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005, 12: 628-629. 10.1038/nsmb947.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Imwong M, Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Mungthin M, Hanchana S, Das D, Phyo AP, Lwin KM, Pukrittayakamee S, Lee SJ, Saisung S, Koecharoen K, Nguon C, Day NPJ, Socheat D, White NJ: Exploring the contribution of candidate genes to artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010, 54: 2886-2892. 10.1128/AAC.00032-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. WHO: The status of drug-resistant malaria along the Thailand-Myanmar border. 2012, World Health Organization, http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/Malaria_drug-resistance-MMMR-THA-border-April-2012.pdf.Google Scholar
  14. ABS: Zevende algemene volks- en woningtelling in Suriname: landelijke resultaten volume I, demografische en sociale karakteristieken. Suriname in Cijfers no 213-2005/02. Paramaribo. 2005, Suriname: Algemeen Bureau voor de Statistiek/CensuskantoorGoogle Scholar
  15. WHO: Report on the situation of malaria in the Americas, 2008. 2008, Suriname: World Health Organization, http://new.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content%26task=view%26id=2459%26Itemid=2000., Chapter 19Google Scholar
  16. Vreden SGS, Jitan JK, Eersel MGM, Keenswijk WG, Danso T, Bretas G, Ruebush TK: Antimalarial efficacy in Suriname. 2001, http://www.usaidami.org/extras/vreden1.pdf., -2006: Implications of evidence-based therapy changeGoogle Scholar
  17. Foley M, Ranford-Cartwright LC, Babiker HA: Rapid and simple method for isolating malaria DNA from fingerprick samples of blood. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992, 53: 241-244. 10.1016/0166-6851(92)90026-G.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Snounou G, Beck HP: The use of PCR genotyping in the assessment of recrudescence or reinfection after antimalarial drug treatment. Parasitol Today. 1998, 14: 462-467. 10.1016/S0169-4758(98)01340-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Felger I, Irion A, Steiger S, Beck HP: Genotypes of merozoite surface protein 2 of Plasmodium falciparum in Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 93 (Suppl 1): 3-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferreira ID, Martinelli A, Rodrigues LA, Do Carmo LE, Do Rosário EV, Póvoa MM, Cravo P: Plasmodium falciparum from Pará state (Brazil) shows satisfactory in vitro response to artemisinin derivatives and absence of the S769N mutation in the SERCA‒type PfATPase6. Trop Med Int Health. 2008, 13: 199-207. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01991.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mugittu K, Genton B, Mshinda H, Beck HP: Molecular monitoring of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin in Tanzania. Malar J. 2006, 5: 126-10.1186/1475-2875-5-126.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cojean S, Hubert V, Le Bras J, Durand R: Resistance to dihydroartemisinin. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12: 1798-1799. 10.3201/eid1211.060903.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunt P, Cravo PVL, Donleavy P, Carlton JM-R, Walliker D: Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium chabaudi: are chloroquine-resistance transporter (crt) and multi-drug resistance (mdr1) orthologues involved?. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004, 133: 27-35. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2003.08.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Price RN, Uhlemann A-C, Brockman A, McGready R, Ashley E, Phaipun L, Patel R, Laing K, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Nosten F, Krishna S: Mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and increased pfmdr1 gene copy number. Lancet. 2004, 364: 438-447. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16767-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Adhin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement