Skip to content


  • Review
  • Open Access

Malaria in South America: a drug discovery perspective

Malaria Journal201312:168

  • Received: 5 March 2013
  • Accepted: 15 May 2013
  • Published:


The challenge of controlling and eventually eradicating malaria means that new tools are urgently needed. South America’s role in this fight spans both ends of the research and development spectrum: both as a continent capable of discovering and developing new medicines, and also as a continent with significant numbers of malaria patients. This article reviews the contribution of groups in the South American continent to the research and development of new medicines over the last decade. Therefore, the current situation of research targeting malaria control and eradication is discussed, including endemicity, geographical distribution, treatment, drug-resistance and diagnosis. This sets the scene for a review of efforts within South America to discover and optimize compounds with anti-malarial activity.


  • South America
  • Malaria
  • Plasmodium
  • Plasmodium vivax
  • Treatment
  • Resistance
  • Drug discovery
  • Review


Malaria is the tropical disease with the highest global mortality. In 2010, there were an estimated 216 million cases of malaria and 655,000 deaths worldwide, with children under five years and pregnant women the most vulnerable [1]. Over 81% of cases and 91% of deaths were in Africa, with the majority of the remaining being in India, Southeast Asia and South America.

South America includes 13 countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, Venezuela and French Guiana. Most malaria cases are concentrated in the Amazon basin, with 580,000 reported in 2010, mainly in Brazil (281,586) [2] and Colombia (115,000) [3]. In 2010 only 240 deaths were registered, 0.085% of the global total. This low number reflected a combination of factors: the higher quality of health care, and the fact that the majority of cases are Plasmodium vivax rather than Plasmodium falciparum (estimated in 70%). Plasmodium vivax mortality is often assigned to sequelae, such as haemolysis or lung inflammation, rather than the parasite itself [4, 5]. Other species of malaria have been reported. Suriname [6] and French Guiana [7] report 12% and 6% Plasmodium malariae infections respectively, although this may be an underestimate resulting from difficult diagnosis in thick-smear blood or rapid tests.

Malaria has been a long-term health issue in South America. Throughout the 20th Century, the continent underwent a rapid and disorganized development and settlement process, leading to a population migration. In the Amazon basin, with increased prospecting for minerals and agricultural projects [8, 9], work opportunities surged. This led to an increase in malaria prevalence and incidence in the 1970s and 1980s [10], a trend that is only now starting to be reversed [11].

South America, with its large biodiversity, has also played a key role in the identification of new medicines to combat malaria. The active cinchona bark, which led to the purification of quinine was first identified in Peru [12], and lapachol, the forerunner of atovaquone, also came from the Amazon basin [13]. This raises the question as to whether there are other natural products that could be useful in malaria. In addition, South America has an excellent scientific and clinical base, which can continue to support the discovery and development of new therapeutics. This review provides an overview of malaria in South America, focusing on progress in drug discovery, and highlighting critical future areas where the continent can support the malaria eradication agenda.

Malaria in South America

The endemicity of malaria can be divided into three levels: high risk, if the annual parasite incidence (API) is higher than 1% of the inhabitants; medium risk, when it is 0.1 to 1% and low risk where it is less than 0.1% [11], (see Figure 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Incidence and risk of transmission of malaria. A- Risk of transmission of malaria, classified by country, in 2010. The dashed blue lines delimit the Amazon basin. B- Distribution of malaria cases in the Amazon basin, in 2010 (based on the WHO World Malaria Report 2011).

Of all the South American countries, Uruguay and Chile are malaria free, with no mosquito-transmitted infections. Argentina and Paraguay are progressing towards elimination [1]. The remainder of the continent shows a broad distribution of cases, with increasing frequency towards the tropics. Brazil, has an overall API of 0.16%, reaching 0.6 to 0.7% in Amazonas and Acre [2]. On the other hand, in Colombia and Suriname 15% of the population live in areas with high transmission, and this number reaches 85% in French Guiana and Guyana where APIs of 35% have been reported locally [7].

In the rainforest region, the primary vector species that transmits Plasmodium parasites is Anopheles darlingi[1416], with other species such as Anopheles albitarsis, Anopheles albimanus, Anopheles aquasalis and Anopheles marajoara playing roles in transmission [1719]. Anopheles gambiae was imported into South America from Africa in the transatlantic slave trade but was eliminated from the continent in the first half of the 20th Century [20, 21]. Anopheles darlingi is an efficient vector, preferring humans over animals, and with a high susceptibility to Plasmodium infection [16]. Although nets are important, they are not sufficient, since many vectors have peak-biting hours before bedtime [22, 23] and in addition not all families have appropriate numbers of bed nets.

The standard treatment for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria is artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [24], outlined in Figure 2. Chloroquine (CQ) is still effective for P. vivax in many countries. However, the Amazon Network for the Surveillance of Antimalarial Drugs Resistance (RAVREDA, Red Amazónica de Vigilancia de la Resistencia a los Antimaláricos) reported 10% resistance to chloroquine in Amazonas, Brazil [25]. Primaquine is the standard therapy for preventing relapses of P. vivax, although there are issues with compliance to the 14-day regimen and a risk of haemolysis in G6PD-deficient subjects. Studies in Brazil showed that primaquine failed to prevent relapses in 24.5% of cases [26]. Whether this is true resistance to the drug or lack of compliance is not clear. It has been suggested that an increased dosage of primaquine is required for South America [27], and Brazil and Peru have recently shifted from 14 days of 0.25 mg/kg/day to seven days of 0.5 mg/kg/day. G6PD deficiency was detected at 3% prevalence in Manaus, Brazil [28] and was predominantly the mild A- form. In Buenaventura, Colombia, where a higher proportion of the population has African origins, prevalence of the mild A- form is 12% [29]. An improved version of primaquine, developed originally by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), called tafenoquine, is under clinical development as a single-dose anti-relapse agent, but this is not expected to be launched before 2017. For severe falciparum malaria, most countries use parenteral quinine, although data from Africa and Asia support a shift to artesunate for injection [30], which has already been pioneered by Brazil.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Malaria treatment. Standard treatment of malaria in South America according to the Ministries of Health from each country and to WHO guidelines for the treatment of various forms of malaria. There is also severe vivax malaria, for which the treatment should be similar to that used in the treatment of severe malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum.

Search methodology

A literature search was conducted in February and March 2012 to identify studies regarding malaria research activities in South America. The sources for published data were SciFinder Scholar®, PubMed® and LILACS®. The date of publication considered spanned from January 2000 to February 2012. The following key words were used for the database search: malaria or anti-malarial. The search list was refined by country by means of the affiliation field. All papers describing any type of drug (based on medicinal chemistry, natural products or other approaches) were selected. Only research showing either in vitro or in vivo activities of molecules was considered. In addition, the database Thomson Pharma® was screened for clinical trials’ protocols conducted within the continent. Papers regarding drug discovery research were divided into two groups: those covering natural products (divided into plant extracts and isolated substances) and those covering studies of new synthetic drug compounds.


Natural products

Pharmacognosy is the study of naturally occurring molecules with medicinal properties. Plant-derived compounds have been the backbone of the anti-malarial class of drugs over the last centuries, and two emerged from South America. Quinine is the active ingredient in cinchona tree bark in Peru and was purified in 1820, becoming the first disclosed compound with known anti-malarial activity. Lapachol, belonging to the chemical class of naphthoquinones, was first isolated from Tabebuia avellanedae in 1882 and used to treat fever and malaria in the 19th Century in South America. A third natural product, artemisinin, was isolated by Chinese scientists from Artemisia annua. These natural products have served as starting points for medicinal chemistry optimization. Chloroquine was designed based on quinine, massively reducing the frequency of administration, and paving the way for a whole new generation of aminoquinolines and amino-alcohols. The chemical optimization from lapachol to atovaquone gave new molecules with more reliable oral bio-availability, allowing them to be used in prophylaxis. Modifying artemisinin to artesunate massively improved solubility (Figure 3), but has also led to the design of new improved endoperoxides such as OZ439 which is currently in Phase II trial to evaluate its efficacy and stability in malaria patients [31]. These improved molecules have been used to treat hundreds of millions of patients over the last century.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Structures of lapachol, atovaquone, artemisinin, artesunate and OZ439. Lapachol and artemisinin are examples of plant-derived compounds that originated anti-malarial compounds. Changes on these compounds gave atovaquone and artesunate, respectively. Additionally, OZ439 was inspired by artemisinin.

South America has a long tradition of studies of natural products based on two approaches: the biological evaluation of traditional medicines and the identification of plants (or organisms) with differences in secondary metabolism [32]. The natural products identified (pharmacognosy) are shown on Table 1. A cut-off of approximately EC50 of 1 μg/mL (1 μM where the active ingredient is well characterized) was used based on the experience that almost 0.5% of chemical diversity is active at this level [33]. The structures of molecules are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Structures of plant-derived compounds. These compounds show activities (EC50) below 1 μM.

Table 1

Summary of pharmacognosy studies



Plant with the lowest IC50


IC50(P. falciparum strain)


Bravo et al.[34]

Bowdichia virgiloides


1.0 μg/mL

Isolated substances

5 μg/mL (F32 and Indo)


Deharo et al.[35]

Bowdichia virgiloides


1 μg/mL (F32)


da Silva Filho et al.[36]

Baccharis dracunculifolia


13 μg/mL

Isolated substances

0.8 μg/mL (W2 e D6)


de Andrade-Neto et al.[37]

Picrolemma spruce

Isolated substances

0.002 μM (K1)


de Andrade-Neto et al.[38]

Holostylis reniformis

Isolated substances

0.20 μM (field isolate)


Kayano et al.[39]

Caesalpina pluviosa


0.59 μg/mL (3D7)


Rocha e Silva et al.[40]

Piper peltatum

Isolated substances

0.05–2.11 μg/mL (M1)


Pinto et al.[41]

Pothomorphe peltata

Isolated substances

0.67 μM (K1)


Garavito et al.[42]

Remijia peruviana


0.85 μg/mL (FcB2)


Debenedetti et al.[43]

Buddleja globosa


8.9 μg/mL (K1)


Baelmans et al.[44]

Caesalpina pluviosa


8 μg/mL (D2)


Flores et al.[45]

Caesalpina pluviosa


3.4 μg/mL

Isolated substances

Inactive (F32)


Ibáñez-Calero et al.[46]

Rumex obtusifolius

Isolated substances

71 μg/mL i


Muñoz et al.[47]

Sparanttanthelium amazonum


2 μg/mL (F32)


Muñoz et al.[48]

Swietenia macrophylla


73% ii


Muñoz et al.[49]

Tripodanthus acutifolis


98% iii


Costa et al.[50]

Montrichardia linifera


11.7 μg/mL (W2)


da Silva Filho et al.[51]

Nectandra megapotamica


28 μg/mL

Isolated substances

3.8 μg/mL (D6)


de Andrade-Neto et al.[52]

Bidens pilosa


3.1 μg/mL (D6)


de Andrade-Neto et al.[53]

Remijia ferruginea


48% iv


de Mesquita et al.[54]

Matayba guianensis

Isolated substances

2.5 μg/mL (FcB1)


Dolabela et al.[55]

Esenbeckia febrifuga


15.5 μg/mL

Isolated substances

75.3 μg/mL (W2)


Estevam et al.[56]

Ouratea nitida


51.04% v


Fischer et al.[57]

Xylopia emarginata


3.3 μg/mL (PA)


Morais et al.[58]

Pentacalia desiderabilis

Isolated substances

7.82 μg/mL (K1)


Oliveira et al.[59]

Bidens pilosa


38% vi


et al.[60]

Physalis angulata

Isolated substances

2.2 μM (W2)


Uchôa et al.[61]

Cecropia pachystachya


66% 4

Isolated substances

58% vii


Loyola et al.[62]

Azorella compacta

Isolated substances

60% viii


Pabón et al.[63]

Solanum nudum

Isolated substances

21 μM (FcB2)


Céline et al.[64]

Siparuna aspera


6.4 μg/mL (FCR-3)


Ruiz et al.[65]

Minquartia guianensis


4.2 μg/mL (FCR-3)

i Inhibition of biocrystallization of ferriprotoporphyrin IX.

ii Percentage of inhibition of parasite growing (dose: 250 mg/kg).

iii Percentage of inhibition of parasite growing (at 10 μg/mL).

iv Reduction of parasitaemia (dose: 1000 mg/kg).

v Activity tested against Plasmodium berghei in mice (dose: 1000 mg/kg).

vi Reduction of parasitaemia at day 5 (dose: 250 mg/kg).

vii Percentage inhibition of parasitaemia in relation to untreated infected mice on day 8 after malaria infection (doses: 250 and 15 mg/kg respectively).

viii Activity in mice measured by the growth of inhibition (dose: 10 mg/kg/day).

Thus, only five purified compounds (Figure 4) have been identified from these efforts. Studies of Bowdichia virgiloides, a plant used by the Tacana indigenous group as a traditional medicine for the relief of high fever, produced alkaloid 1 (ormosanine), having an EC50 = 5 μg/mL against F32. In vivo, the extract showed 51% suppression of parasites in mice at 100 mg/kg, but was toxic at 250 mg/kg. Baccharis dracunculifolia is broadly used in traditional medicine in Brazil, in inflammatory and gastrointestinal diseases. Although the total extract was inactive, the isolated the triterpenoid 2 showed anti-malarial and anti-leishmanial activity. In vitro screening of substances isolated from the Brazilian folk medicines identified neosergeolide 3, from Picrolemma spruce, which inhibits K1 with an impressive EC50 = 2 nM; and, the aryltetralone 4 from Holostylis reniformis, with an EC50 = 20 nM; both are claimed to have good therapeutic window against hepatocytes. Further testing of these compounds would be needed to assess their strengths and weaknesses. The 4-nerolidylcatechol 5 was isolated from another traditional Amazonian treatment of malaria, Piper peltatum and shown to have an EC50 between 50 and 830 ng/ml. Catechol 5 was also independently isolated from Pothomorphe peltata as shown in Table 1.

Medicinal chemistry

Medicinal chemistry approaches start from the knowledge of a structure combined with biological activity. Such starting points can be found from screening efforts (for example, pharmaceutical diversity or natural products against a biochemical target or whole cell), de novo design or from a published active, which can then act as a starting point for optimization. The molecules that have been identified from various sources against malaria with relevant endpoints and published within the South American medicinal chemistry community are summarized in Table 2, and in addition, their structures are presented in Figure 5. Studies characterizing the spectroscopy of previously described molecules, or studies on marketed anti-malarials have not been included.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Structures of compounds with relevant endpoints. Compounds with the square brackets show activities (EC50) below 1 μM.

Table 2

Summary of medicinal chemistry studies




Chemical class

Lowest IC50(strain)


Sperandeo and Brun [[66]]


Pyrazolylnaphthoquinones, 5-aminoisoxazole

0.11 μg/mL (K1)


Silva et al.[67]



0.03 μM (FcB1)


Charris et al.[68]





Cunico et al.[69]

Aspartyl protease


4.6 μM (3D7)


Cunico et al.[70]

Aspartyl protease


5.1 μg/mL (W2)


Gnoatto et al.[71]


Piperazine, 3-acetylursolic acid

0.08 μM (FcB1)


de Sá et al.[72]


Betulinic acid

5.99 μM (W2)


Pinheiro et al.[73]



0.05 ng/mL (P. falciparum mefloquine resistant)


Barbosa et al.[74]



13.6 μg/mL


Oliveira et al.[75]

Cysteine proteases

Semicarbazone, Thiosemicarbazone

7.2 μM (W2)


Camacho et al.[76]



8.43 μM


Corrales et al.[77]

Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase

6-thiopurine Steroids



Barazarte et al.[78]


Pyrazolo and pyrimido benzothiazine dioxide



Barazarte et al.[79]





Vellasco Junior et al.[80]

Aspartyl protease

Thioetherhydroxyethyl, Sulfonamides

15 μM (W2)


Dominguez et al.[81]


Chlorovinyl sulfones

0.025 μM (W2)


Dominguez et al.[82]


Sulfonamide chalcones

0.48 μM (W2)


León et al.[83]

Glucose metabolism β-haematin


1.2 μM (W2)


Arancibia et al.[84]


Rhenium bioorganometalics, Aminoquinoline

0.048 μM (3D7)


Rojas Ruiz et al.[85]


Aminoquinolines, thiazolidinone

0.25 μM (3D7)


Charris et al.[86]





Vashist et al.[87]


Quinolone, 6-thiopurine



de Souza et al.[88]


4-aminoquinolines, platinum (II) complexes

84 %4


Cunico et al.[89]



1.39 μg/mL (W2)


Rodrigues et al.[90]





Domínguez et al.[91]

Cysteine protease falcipain

Quinolinyl chalcones

19 μM (FcB1)


Ferrer et al.[92]





Navarro et al.[93]


Gold-chloroquine complexes



Domínguez et al.[94]

Cysteine protease β-haematin

Phenylurenyl chalcones

1.76 μM


de Andrade-Neto et al.[95]


Naphthoquinones, Phenazines

1.67 μM (W2)


Hilário et al.[96]


3-alkylpyridines alkaloids

<3.38 μM (W2)


Rodrigues et al.[97]



56.76 %2

1 Percentage of inhibition of parasite growth (P. berghei in mice) at day 9 (dose: 10 mg/kg).

2 Inhibition of globin proteolysis (IGP) expressed as percentage.

3 Inhibition of β-haematin synthesis (IβHS) expressed as percentage.

4 Inhibition of parasite multiplication on days (dose: 25 mg/kg).

5 Activity expressed as IC50(CQDP)/IC50(complex).

Those compounds having EC50 values less than 1 μg/ml (with a square box around) are discussed further as this is the typical potency cut-off required for “Validated Hits” – the starting points for drug discovery projects, as considered by the Medicines for Malaria Venture [98, 99].

New pyrazolylnaphthoquinones (heterocyclic naphthoquinones, building on the atovaquone template bearing 3-aminopyrazole rings) and 5-aminoisoxazole analogues showed activity against P. falciparum, Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma brucei. The 5-aminoisoxazole analogue 6 showed an EC50 of 110 ng/mL and an independent naphthoquinone, 7, demonstrated an EC50 of 30 nM against FcB1. A novel piperazinyl/steroidal analogue, 11, also inhibited FcB1 with an EC50 of 0.08 μM. Pinheiro et al. used a multivariate and quantum mechanical method to analyse 15 dihydroartemisinin derivatives and the most potent compound, 13, showed an EC50 of 0.05 ng/mL, over 10-fold more potent than the reported values for dihydroartemisinin. Two papers describe chalcone derivatives: the electrophilic chloro-vinyl sulphone 21 showed an EC50 of 0.025 μM against W2 and the sulphonamide chalcone 22 showed an EC50 of 0.48 μM. Finally, approaches to aminoquinolines identified the derivative 24 with an EC50 of 48 nM, against the 3D7 strain; and new heterocyclic hybrids based on the chloroquine and thiazolidinone scaffolds such as 25 have an EC50 of 0.25 μM.


In South America, the morbidity and mortality due to malaria is much less significant than in Africa. However, the continent has historically been the source of two of the major classes of drugs against malaria, and the combination of both biodiversity and skilled medicinal chemists could position the continent in a leading position in the search for the new medicines needed for malaria eradication. The current biggest threat in the fight against malaria is the emerging resistance to artemisinin derivatives [100, 101]. Artemisinin derivatives within ACT are the most widely used anti-malarials. Even though there has been a concerted attempt to protect them against resistance by banning artesunate monotherapy for uncomplicated disease, the first signs of artemisinin resistance or insensitivity have been described in Cambodia [102] and more recently in Thailand [103]. There is a great need for new combination therapy, replacing the three days’ dosing of ACT with a single dose that also prevents transmission and relapse (in the case of P. vivax or Plasmodium ovale) [104].

Pharmacognosy has continued to identify new active structures [105]. However, the progress in bringing forward new medicines from these structures and extracts is extremely difficult. Where such molecules are reported to have interesting properties from observational studies, then it is important to confirm these observations in carefully controlled human clinical studies [106]. Also, it is possible that the active principle is a metabolite from the original extract, and so analysis of plasma samples is also important in understanding and identifying the active species [33]. Secondary metabolites are usually thought to play a key role in protection against predators, and therefore could be expected to be cytotoxic. Screening for activity in early safety assays is therefore of paramount concern here. Ultimately the goal of such experiments is to identify new starting points for medicines, similar to the way that quinine and lapachol opened up new fields in previous centuries. Such approaches require long-term commitment, and hence the need to verify the original clinical observations.

The other approach to discover new drugs is to use medicinal chemistry, either with scaffolds already known to be effective against the parasite, or a target-based approach based on structural biology. The results of this survey show that molecules coming from South American programmes are able to demonstrate innovative and active new structures. However over the last five years, the bar has been raised and a new challenge has been set as a result of the success of phenotypic screening. With over 20,000 structures of compounds active against the parasite deposited in the public domain [107, 108], it is important to benchmark the successes found in South America against these results. Clearly the prize no longer goes to compounds that simply kill the parasite in vitro, but to molecules that have good properties supporting excellent oral administration in patients, or perhaps equal artemisinins in speed of killing parasites [109], or have a very low propensity to resistance generation [110]. In the light of the malaria eradication agenda, it will be important also to know how these new molecules work in the different stages of the parasite lifecycle [111]. A molecule that could be shown to inhibit the dormant liver stages of P. vivax would clearly stand out from the crowd [112]. All of the tools are available to enable South American anti-malarial drug research to make these steps forward over the next five years, the challenge will be to put these together, and focus the agenda to the needs of the South American community.


Malaria continues to be a health issue, particularly P. vivax in the Amazon basin, and P. falciparum and mixed infections in northern countries. The natural diversity along with the indigenous folk medicines allows a great potential in the treatment and identification of new anti-malarial drugs, as happened with the South American compounds, lapachol and quinine. New molecules are being identified but their optimization for in vivo activity has been slow, arguing that more resource needs to be focused in these areas. In addition, the new assays for transmission and relapse of dormant liver stages need to be put into routine practice. If all this is put together, then South America can again play a leading role in the discovery of the next generation of therapeutics against malaria.



Artemisinin-based combinations therapy


Annual Parasite Incidence


Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase


Amazon Network for the Surveillance of Antimalarial Drugs Resistance


World Health Organization


Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.



We acknowledge the Medicines for Malaria Venture, especially Jeremy Burrows for critical comments on the manuscript. The authors are also grateful to Carlos Morel and Simon Campbell. MVGL is a level 2 Fellow from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Authors’ Affiliations

Medicines for Malaria Venture, 20 route de Pré-Bois, Geneva, CH 1215, Switzerland
Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr Heitor Vieira Dourado, Av Pedro Teixeira, 25, Manaus, Amazonas, 69040-000, Brazil


  1. WHO: World Malaria Report 2011. 2011, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  2. Brazil, Ministry of Health: Portal da Saúde. 2012, []Google Scholar
  3. Rodríguez JCP, Uribe GA, Araújo RM, Narváez PC, Valencia SH: Epidemiology and control of malaria in Colombia. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011, 106: 114-122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Anstey NM, Russel B, Yeo TW, Price RN: The pathophysiology of vivax malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2009, 25: 220-227. 10.1016/ Scholar
  5. Lacerda MV, Fragoso SC, Alecrim MG, Alexandre MA, Magalhães BM, Siqueira AM, Ferreira LC, Araújo JR, Mourão MP, Ferrer M, Castillo P, Martin-Jaular L, Fernandez-Becerra C, del Portillo H, Ordi J, Alonso PL, Bassat Q: Postmortem characterization of patients with clinical diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax malaria: to what extent does this parasite kill?. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 55: e67-e74. 10.1093/cid/cis615.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Peek R, VAN Gool T, Panchoe D, Greve S, Bus E, Resida L: Drug resistance and genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum parasites from Suriname. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 73: 833-838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Stefani A, Hanf M, Nacher M, Girod R, Carme B: Environmental, entomological, socioeconomic and behavioural risk factors for malaria attacks in Amerindian children of Camopi, French Guiana. Malar J. 2011, 10: 246-10.1186/1475-2875-10-246.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Oliveira-Ferreira J, Lacerda MV, Brasil P, Ladislau JL, Tauil PL, Daniel-Ribeiro CT: Malaria in Brazil: an overview. Malar J. 2010, 1: 15-Google Scholar
  9. Alvarez A: Malaria and the emergence of rural health in Argentina: an analysis from the perspective of international interaction and co-operation. Can Bull Med Hist. 2008, 25: 137-160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter R, Mendis KN: Evolutionary and Historical Aspects of the Burden of Malaria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002, 15: 564-594. 10.1128/CMR.15.4.564-594.2002.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pan American Health Organization: Report on the situation of malaria in the Americas, 2008. 2010, Washington, D.C: PAHO,,Google Scholar
  12. Achan J, Talisuna AO, Erhart A, Yeka A, Tibenderana JK, Baliraine FN, Rosenthal PJ, D’Alessandro U: Quinine, an old antimalarial drug in a modern world: role in the treatment of malaria. Malar J. 2011, 10: 144-10.1186/1475-2875-10-144.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hudson AT: Atovaquone – a novel broad-spectrum anti-infective drug. Parasitol Today. 1993, 9: 66-68. 10.1016/0169-4758(93)90040-M.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rutar T, Baldomar Salgueiro EJ, Maguire JH: Introduced Plasmodium vivax malaria in a Bolivian community at an elevation of 2,300 meters. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 70: 15-19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sutton PL, Neyra V, Hernandez JN, Branch OH: Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax infections in the Peruvian Amazon: propagation of complex, multiple allele-type infections without super-infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 81: 950-960. 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.09-0132.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Magris M, Rubio-Palis Y, Menares C, Villegas L: Vector bionomics and malaria transmission in the Upper Orinoco River, Southern Venezuela. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007, 102: 303-311. 10.1590/S0074-02762007005000049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. da Rocha JAM, de Oliveira SB, Póvoa MM, Moreira LA, Krettli AU: Malaria vectors in areas of Plasmodium falciparum epidemic transmission in the Amazon region, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008, 78: 872-877.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pinault LL, Hunter FF: New highland distribution records of multiple Anopheles species in the Ecuadorian Andes. Malar J. 2011, 10: 236-10.1186/1475-2875-10-236.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Moreno JE, Rubio-Palis Y, Páez E, Pérez E, Sánchez V: Abundance, biting behaviour and parous rate of anopheline mosquito species in relation to malaria incidence in gold-mining areas of southern Venezuela. Med Vet Entomol. 2007, 21: 339-349. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00704.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yalcindag E, Elguero E, Arnathau C, Durand P, Akiana J, Anderson TJ, Aubouy A, Balloux F, Besnard P, Bogreau H, Carnevale P, D’Alessandro U, Fontenille D, Gamboa D, Jombart T, Le Mire J, Leroy E, Maestre A, Mayxay M, Ménard D, Musset L, Newton PN, Nkoghé D, Noya O, Ollomo B, Rogier C, Veron V, Wide A, Zakeri S, Carme B, Legrand E, Chevillon C, Ayala FJ, Renaud F, Prugnolle F: Multiple independent introductions of Plasmodium falciparum in South America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012, 109: 511-516. 10.1073/pnas.1119058109.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Silva LHP, Oliveira VEG: The malaria challenge: the Brazilian case and what can be expected from progress in genomics. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2002, 7: 49-63.Google Scholar
  22. Magris M, Rubio-Palis Y, Alexander N, Ruiz B, Galván N, Frias D, Blanco M, Lines J: Community-randomized trial of lambdacyhalothrin-treated hammock nets for malaria control in Yanomami communities in the Amazon region of Venezuela. Trop Med Int Health. 2007, 12: 392-403. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01801.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill N, Lenglet A, Arnéz AM, Carneiro I: Plant based insect repellent and insecticide treated bed nets to protect against malaria in areas of early evening biting vectors: double blind randomised placebo controlled clinical trial in the Bolivian Amazon. BMJ. 2007, 335: 1023-10.1136/bmj.39356.574641.55.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. World Health Organization: Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 2010, World Health Organization: Geneva,, Second,Google Scholar
  25. Santana Filho F, Arcanjo A, Chehuan YM, Costa MR, Martinez-Espinosa FE, Vieira JL, Barbosa M, Alecrim WD, Alecrim M: Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax, Brazilian Amazon. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007, 13: 1125-1126. 10.3201/eid1307.061386.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gama BE, Lacerda MVG, Daniel-Ribeiro CT, Ferreira-da-Cruz MDF: Chemoresistance of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax parasites in Brazil: consequences on disease morbidity and control. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011, 106: 159-166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Van den Eede P, Soto-Calle VE, Delgado C, Gamboa D, Grande T, Rodriguez H, Llanos-Cuentas A, Anné J, D’Alessandro U, Erhart A: Plasmodium vivax sub-patent infections after radical treatment are common in Peruvian patients: results of a 1-year prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e16257-10.1371/journal.pone.0016257.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Santana MS, de Lacerda MVG, Barbosa MDGV, Alecrim WD, Alecrim MDGC: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in an endemic area for malaria in Manaus: a cross-sectional survey in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e5259-10.1371/journal.pone.0005259.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Moyano M, Méndez F: Defectos eritrocíticos y densidad de la parasitemia en pacientes con malaria por Plasmodium falciparum en Buenaventura, Colombia. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005, 18: 25-32. 10.1590/S1020-49892005000600005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dondorp AM, Fanello CI, Hendriksen IC, Gomes E, Seni A, Chhaganlal KD, Bojang K, Olaosebikan R, Anunobi N, Maitland K, Kivaya E, Agbenyega T, Nguah SB, Evans J, Gesase S, Kahabuka C, Mtove G, Nadjm B, Deen J, Mwanga-Amumpaire J, Nansumba M, Karema C, Umulisa N, Uwimana A, Mokuolu OA, Adedoyin OT, Johnson WB, Shefu AK, Onyamboko MA, Sakulthaew T, Ngum WP, Silamut K, Stepniewska K, Woodrow J, Bethell D, Wills B, Oneko M, Peto TE, von Seidlein L, Day NP, White NJ, QUAMAT group: Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): an open-label, randomised trial. Lancet. 2010, 376: 1647-1657. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61924-1.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Charman SA, Arbe-Barnes S, Bathurst IC, Brun R, Campbell M, Charman WN, Chiu FC, Chollet J, Craft JC, Creek DJ, Dong Y, Matile H, Maurer M, Morizzi J, Nguyen T, Papastogiannidis P, Scheurer C, Shackleford DM, Sriraghavan K, Stingelin L, Tang Y, Urwyler H, Wang X, White KL, Wittlin S, Zhou L, Vennerstrom JL: Synthetic ozonide drug candidate OZ439 offers new hope for a single-dose cure of uncomplicated malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011, 108: 4400-4405. 10.1073/pnas.1015762108.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bourdy G, Willcox ML, Ginsburg H, Rasoanaivo P, Graz B, Deharo E: Ethnopharmacology and malaria: new hypothetical leads or old efficient antimalarials?. Int J Parasitol. 2008, 38: 33-41. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.07.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wells TNC: Natural products as starting points for future antimalarial therapies: going back to our roots?. Malar J. 2011, 10: S3-10.1186/1475-2875-10-S1-S3.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bravo JA, Lavaud C, Bourdy G, Deharo E, Gimenez A, Sauvain M: Antimalarial activity of ormosanine and homoormosanine from Bowdichia virgiloides. Revista Boliviana de Quimica. 2002, 19: 12-17.Google Scholar
  35. Deharo E, Bourdy G, Quenevo C, Muñoz V, Ruiz G, Sauvain M: A search for natural bioactive compounds in Bolivia through a multidisciplinary approach. Part V. Evaluation of the antimalarial activity of plants used by the Tacana Indians. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 77: 91-98. 10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00270-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. da Silva Filho AA, Resende DO, Fukui MJ, Santos FF, Pauletti PM, Cunha WR, Silva ML, Gregório LE, Bastos JK, Nanayakkara NP: In vitro antileishmanial, antiplasmodial and cytotoxic activities of phenolics and triterpenoids from Baccharis dracunculifolia D. C. (Asteraceae). Fitoterapia. 2009, 80: 478-482. 10.1016/j.fitote.2009.06.007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. de Andrade-Neto VF, Pohlit AM, Pinto AC, Silva EC, Nogueira KL, Melo MR, Henrique MC, Amorim RC, Silva LF, Costa MR, Nunomura RC, Nunomura SM, Alecrim WD, Alecrim M, Chaves FC, Vieira PP: In vitro inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum by substances isolated from Amazonian antimalarial plants. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007, 102: 359-365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. de Andrade-Neto VF, da Silva T, Lopes LM, Do Rosário VE, de Pilla Varotti F, Krettli AU: Antiplasmodial activity of aryltetralone lignans from Holostylis reniformis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007, 51: 2346-2350. 10.1128/AAC.01344-06.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kayano AC, Lopes SC, Bueno FG, Cabral EC, Souza-Neiras WC, Yamauchi LM, Foglio MA, Eberlin MN, Mello JC, Costa FT: In vitro and in vivo assessment of the anti-malarial activity of Caesalpinia pluviosa. Malar J. 2011, 10: 112-10.1186/1475-2875-10-112.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Silva LF RE, Silva Pinto AC, Pohlit AM, Quignard EL, Vieira PP, Tadei WP, Chaves FC, Samonek JF, Lima CA, Costa MR, Alecrim M, Andrade-Neto VF: In vivo and in vitro antimalarial activity of 4-nerolidylcatechol. Phytother Res. 2011, 25: 1181-1188. 10.1002/ptr.3424.Google Scholar
  41. Pinto AC, Silva LF, Cavalcanti BC, Melo MR, Chaves FC, Lotufo LV, de Moraes MO, de Andrade-Neto VF, Tadei WP, Pessoa CO, Vieira PP, Pohlit AM: New antimalarial and cytotoxic 4-nerolidylcatechol derivatives. Eur J Med Chem. 2009, 44: 2731-2735. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.10.025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Garavito G, Rincón J, Arteaga L, Hata Y, Bourdy G, Gimenez A, Pinzón R, Deharo E: Antimalarial activity of some Colombian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 107: 460-462. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Debenedetti S, Muschietti L, van Baren C, Clavin M, Broussalis A, Martino V, Houghton PJ, Warhurst D, Steele J: In vitro antiplasmodial activity of extracts of Argentinian plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 80: 163-166. 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00024-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Baelmans R, Deharo E, Bourdy G, Muñoz V, Quenevo C, Sauvain M, Ginsburg H: A search for natural bioactive compounds in Bolivia through a multidisciplinary approach. Part IV. Is a new haem polymerisation inhibition test pertinent for the detection of antimalarial natural products?. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 73: 271-275. 10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00330-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Flores Y, Vila J, Almanza GR: Secondary metabolites from Caesalpinia pluviosa. Revista Boliviana de Quimica. 2006, 23: 1-8.Google Scholar
  46. Ibáñez-Calero SL, Jullian V, Sauvain M: A new anthraquinone isolated from Rumex obtusifolius. Revista Boliviana de Química. 2009, 26: 49-56.Google Scholar
  47. Muñoz V, Sauvain M, Bourdy G, Callapa J, Bergeron S, Rojas I, Bravo JA, Balderrama L, Ortiz B, Gimenez A, Deharo E: A search for natural bioactive compounds in Bolivia through a multidisciplinary approach. Part I. Evaluation of the antimalarial activity of plants used by the Chacobo Indians. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 69: 127-137. 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00148-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Muñoz V, Sauvain M, Bourdy G, Callapa J, Rojas I, Vargas L, Tae A, Deharo E: The search for natural bioactive compounds through a multidisciplinary approach in Bolivia. Part II. Antimalarial activity of some plants used by Mosetene indians. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 69: 139-155. 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00096-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Muñoz V, Sauvain M, Bourdy G, Arrázola S, Callapa J, Ruiz G, Choque J, Deharo E: A search for natural bioactive compounds in Bolivia through a multidisciplinary approach. Part III. Evaluation Of the antimalarial activity of plants used by Alteños Indians. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 71: 123-131. 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00191-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Costa ESS, Dolabela MF, Povoa MM, Oliveira DJ, Müller AH: Estudos farmacognósticos, fitoquímicos, atividade antiplasmódica e toxicidade em Artemia salina de extrato etanólico de folhas de Montrichardia linifera (Arruda) Schott, Araceae. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia. 2009, 19: 834-838. 10.1590/S0102-695X2009000600006.Google Scholar
  51. da Silva Filho AA, Costa ES, Cunha WR, e Silva ML, Nanayakkara NP, Bastos JK: In vitro antileishmanial and antimalarial activities of tetrahydrofuran lignans isolated from Nectandra megapotamica (Lauraceae). Phytother Res. 2008, 22: 1307-1310. 10.1002/ptr.2486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Andrade-Neto VF, Brandão MG, Oliveira FQ, Casali VW, Njaine B, Zalis MG, Oliveira LA, Krettli AU: Antimalarial activity of Bidens pilosa L. (Asteraceae) ethanol extacts from wild plans collected in various localities or plants cultivated in humus soil. Phytother Res. 2004, 18: 634-639. 10.1002/ptr.1510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. de Andrade-Neto VF, Brandão MGL, Stehmann LA, Krettli A: Antimalarial activity of Cinchona-like plants used to treat fever and malaria in Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 87: 253-256. 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00141-7.Google Scholar
  54. de Mesquita ML, Grellier P, Blond A, Brouard JP, de Paula JE, Espindola LS, Mambu L: New ether diglycosides from Matayba guianensis with antiplasmodial activity. Bioorg Med Chem. 2005, 13: 4499-4506. 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.04.043.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Dolabela MF, Oliveira SG, Nascimento JM, Peres JM, Wagner H, Póvoa MM, de Oliveira AB: In vitro antiplasmodial activity of extract and constituents from Esenbeckia febrifuga, a plant traditionally used to treat malaria in the Brazilian Amazon. Phytomedicine. 2008, 15: 367-372. 10.1016/j.phymed.2008.02.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Estevam CS, Oliveira FM, Conserva LM, Lima LF, Barros ECP, Barros SCP, Rocha EMM, Andrade EHA: Constituintes químicos e avaliação preliminar in vivo da atividade antimalárica de Ouratea nitida Aubl (Ochnaceae). Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2005, 15: 195-198. 10.1590/S0102-695X2005000300005.Google Scholar
  57. Fischer D, Gualda N, Bachiega D: In vitro screening for antiplasmodial activity of isoquinoline alkaloids from Brazilian plant species. Acta Trop. 2004, 92: 261-266. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.08.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Morais TR, Romoff P, Fávero OA, Reimão JQ, Lourenço WC, Tempone AG, Hristov AD, Di Santi SM, Lago JH, Sartorelli P, Ferreira MJ: Anti-malarial, anti-trypanosomal, and anti-leishmanial activities of jacaranone isolated from Pentacalia desiderabilis (Vell.) Cuatrec. (Asteraceae). Parasitol Res. 2012, 110: 95-101. 10.1007/s00436-011-2454-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Oliveira FQ, Andrade-Neto V, Krettli AU, Brandão MGL: New evidences of antimalarial activity of Bidens pilosa roots extract correlated with polyacetylene and flavonoids. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 93: 39-42. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.03.026.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Sá MS, de Menezes MN, Krettli AU, Ribeiro IM, Tomassini TC, Ribeiro dos Santos R, de Azevedo WF, Soares MB: Antimalarial activity of physalins B, D, F, and G. J Nat Prod. 2011, 74: 2269-2272. 10.1021/np200260f.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Uchôa VT, de Paula RC, Krettli LG, Goulart Santana AE, Krettli AU: Antimalarial activity of compounds and mixed fractions of Cecropia pachystachya. Drug Dev Res. 2010, 71: 82-91.Google Scholar
  62. Loyola LA, Bórquez J, Morales G, San-Martín A, Darias J, Flores N, Giménez A: Mulinane-type diterpenoids from Azorella compacta display antiplasmodial activity. Phytochemistry. 2004, 65: 1931-1935. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.06.011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Pabón A, Carmona J, Maestre A, Camargo M, Blair S: Inhibition of P. falciparum by Steroids Isolated from Solanum nudum. Phytother Res. 2002, 62: 59-62.Google Scholar
  64. Valadeau C, Pabon A, Deharo E, Albán-Castillo J, Estevez Y, Lores FA, Rojas R, Gamboa D, Sauvain M, Castillo D, Bourdy G: Medicinal plants from the Yanesha (Peru): evaluation of the leishmanicidal and antimalarial activity of selected extracts. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 123: 413-422. 10.1016/j.jep.2009.03.041.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Ruiz L, Ruiz L, Maco M, Cobos M, Gutierrez-Choquevilca AL, Roumy V: Plants used by native Amazonian groups from the Nanay River (Peru) for the treatment of malaria. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 133: 917-921. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.10.039.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sperandeo NR, Brun R: Synthesis and biological evaluation of pyrazolylnaphthoquinones as new potential antiprotozoal and cytotoxic agents. Chembiochem. 2003, 4: 69-72. 10.1002/cbic.200390016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. da Silva AJM, Netto CD, Pacienza-Lima W, Torres-Santos EC, Rossi-Bergmann B, Maurel S, Valentin A, Costa PRR: Antitumoral, antileishmanial and antimalarial activity of pentacyclic 1,4-naphthoquinone derivatives. J Braz Chem Soc. 2009, 20: 176-182. 10.1590/S0103-50532009000100026.Google Scholar
  68. Charris J, Barazarte A, Domínguez J, Lobo G, Camacho J, Ferrer R, Gamboa N, Rodrigues J: Synthesis and antimalarial activity of ethyl 3-amino-4-oxo-9-(phenylsubstituted) thieno [2, 3-b] quinoline-2-carboxylate derivatives. J Heterocyclic Chem. 2007, 44: 639-643. 10.1002/jhet.5570440320.Google Scholar
  69. Cunico W, Gomes CR, Facchinetti V, Moreth M, Penido C, Henriques MG, Varotti FP, Krettli LG, Krettli AU, da Silva FS, Caffarena ER, de Magalhães CS: Synthesis, antimalarial evaluation and molecular modeling studies of hydroxyethylpiperazines, potential aspartyl protease inhibitors, part 2. Eur J Med Chem. 2009, 44: 3816-3820. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.03.041.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Cunico W, Gomes CR, Moreth M, Manhanini DP, Figueiredo IH, Penido C, Henriques MG, Varotti FP, Krettli AU: Synthesis and antimalarial activity of hydroxyethylpiperazine derivatives. Eur J Med Chem. 2009, 44: 1363-1368. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.04.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Gnoatto SC, Susplugas S, Dalla Vechia L, Ferreira TB, Dassonville-Klimpt A, Zimmer KR, Demailly C, Da Nascimento S, Guillon J, Grellier P, Verli H, Gosmann G, Sonnet P: Pharmacomodulation on the 3-acetylursolic acid skeleton: Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel N-{3-[4-(3-aminopropyl)piperazinyl]propyl}-3-O-acetylursolamide derivatives as antimalarial agents. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008, 16: 771-782. 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.10.031.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. de Sá MS, Costa JF, Krettli AU, Zalis MG, Maia GL, Sette IM, Câmara Cde A, Filho JM, Giulietti-Harley AM, Ribeiro Dos Santos R, Soares MB: Antimalarial activity of betulinic acid and derivatives in vitro against Plasmodium falciparum and in vivo in P. berghei-infected mice. Parasitol Res. 2009, 105: 275-279. 10.1007/s00436-009-1394-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Pinheiro JC, Ferreira MMC, Romero OAS: Antimalarial activity of dihydroartemisinin derivatives against P. falciparum resistant to mefloquine: a quantum chemical and multivariate study. Science. 2001, 572: 35-44.Google Scholar
  74. Barbosa LCA, Maltha CRA, Alvarenga E: Síntese e avaliação da atividade antimalarica de novos ozonideos. Eclética Química. 2002, 27: 1-9.Google Scholar
  75. de Oliveira RB, de Souza-Fagundes EM, Soares RP, Andrade AA, Krettli AU, Zani CL: Synthesis and antimalarial activity of semicarbazone and thiosemicarbazone derivatives. Eur J Med Chem. 2008, 43: 1983-1988. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2007.11.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Camacho J, Barazarte A, Gamboa N, Rodrigues J, Rojas R, Vaisberg A, Gilman R, Charris J: Synthesis and biological evaluation of benzimidazole-5-carbohydrazide derivatives as antimalarial, cytotoxic and antitubercular agents. Bioorg Med Chem. 2011, 19: 2023-2029. 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.01.050.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Corrales RC, de Souza NB, Pinheiro LS, Abramo C, Coimbra ES, Da Silva AD: Thiopurine derivatives containing triazole and steroid: synthesis, antimalarial and antileishmanial activities. Biomed Pharmacother. 2011, 65: 198-203. 10.1016/j.biopha.2010.10.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Barazarte A, Lobo G, Gamboa N, Rodrigues JR, Capparelli MV, Alvarez-Larena A, López SE, Charris JE: Synthesis and antimalarial activity of pyrazolo and pyrimido benzothiazine dioxide derivatives. Eur J Med Chem. 2009, 44: 1303-1310. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.08.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Barazarte A, Camacho J, Domínguez J, Lobo G, Gamboa N, Rodrigues J, Capparelli MV, Alvarez-Larena A, Andujar S, Enriz D, Charris J: Synthesis, antimalarial activity, structure-activity relationship analysis of thieno-[3,2-b]benzothiazine S, S-dioxide analogs. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008, 16: 3661-3674. 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.02.011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Vellasco Junior WT, Guedes GP, Vasconcelos TR, Vaz MG, de Souza MV, Krettli AU, Krettli LG, Aguiar AC, Gomes CR, Cunico W: Synthesis and antimalarial activity of thioetherhydroxyethylsulfonamides, potential aspartyl protease inhibitors, Part 3. Eur J Med Chem. 2011, 46: 5688-5693. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.09.025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Dominguez JN, Leon C, Rodrigues J, Gamboa de Dominguez N, Gut J, Rosenthal PJ: Synthesis of chlorovinyl sulfones as structural analogs of chalcones and their antiplasmodial activities. Eur J Med Chem. 2009, 44: 1457-1462. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.09.044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Domínguez JN, León C, Rodrigues J, Gamboa de Dominguez N, Gut J, Rosenthal PJ: Synthesis and antimalarial activity of sulfonamide chalcone derivatives. Farmaco. 2005, 60: 307-311. 10.1016/j.farmac.2005.01.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. León C, Rodrigues J, Gamboa de Domínguez N, Charris J, Gut J, Rosenthal PJ, Domínguez JN: Synthesis and evaluation of sulfonylurea derivatives as novel antimalarials. Eur J Med Chem. 2007, 42: 735-742. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2007.01.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Arancibia R, Dubar F, Pradines B, Forfar I, Dive D, Klahn AH, Biot C: Synthesis and antimalarial activities of rhenium bioorganometallics based on the 4-aminoquinoline structure. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010, 18: 8085-8091. 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.09.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Rojas Ruiz FA, García-Sánchez RN, Estupiñan SV, Gómez-Barrio A, Torres Amado DF, Pérez-Solórzano BM, Nogal-Ruiz JJ, Martínez-Fernández AR, Kouznetsov VV: Synthesis and antimalarial activity of new heterocyclic hybrids based on chloroquine and thiazolidinone scaffolds. Bioorg Med Chem. 2011, 19: 4562-4573. 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.06.025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Charris JE, Domínguez JN, Gamboa N, Rodrigues JR, Angel JE: Synthesis and antimalarial activity of E-2-quinolinylbenzocycloalcanones. Eur J Med Chem. 2005, 40: 875-881. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2005.03.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Vashist U, Carvalhaes R, D’agosto M, da Silva AD: Antimalarial activity of the novel quinoline/6-thiopurine conjugate in Gallus gallus Linnaeus, infected experimentally by Plasmodium (Novyella) juxtanucleare. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2009, 74: 434-437. 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2009.00877.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. de Souza NB, Carmo AM, Lagatta DC, Alves MJ, Fontes AP, Coimbra ES, da Silva AD, Abramo C: 4-aminoquinoline analogues and its platinum (II) complexes as antimalarial agents. Biomed Pharmacother. 2011, 65: 313-316. 10.1016/j.biopha.2011.03.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Cunico W, Cechinel CA, Bonacorso HG, Martins MA, Zanatta N, de Souza MV, Freitas IO, Soares RP, Krettli AU: Antimalarial activity of 4-(5-trifluoromethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-chloroquine analogues. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006, 16: 649-653. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.10.033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Rodrigues J, Charris J, Domínguez J, Ángel J, Gamboa N: Modification of oxidative status in Plasmodium berghei-infected erythrocytes by E-2-chloro-8-methyl-3-[(4’-methoxy-1’-indanoyl)-2’-methyliden]-quinoline compared to chloroquine. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104: 865-870. 10.1590/S0074-02762009000600008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Domínguez JN, Charris JE, Lobo G, Gamboa de Domínguez N, Moreno MM, Riggione F, Sanchez E, Olson J, Rosenthal PJ: Short communication Synthesis of quinolinyl chalcones and evaluation of their antimalarial activity. Eur J Med Chem. 2001, 36: 555-560. 10.1016/S0223-5234(01)01245-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Ferrer R, Lobo G, Gamboa N, Rodrigues J, Abramjuk C, Jung K, Lein M, Charris JE: Synthesis of [(7-chloroquinolinyl-4-yl)amino]chalcones: potential antimalarial and anticancer agents. Sci Pharm. 2009, 77: 725-741.Google Scholar
  93. Navarro M, Vásquez F, Sánchez-Delgado RA, Pérez H, Sinou V, Schrével J: Toward a novel metal-based chemotherapy against tropical diseases. 7. Synthesis and in vitro antimalarial activity of new gold-chloroquine complexes. J Med Chem. 2004, 47: 5204-5209. 10.1021/jm049792o.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Domínguez JN, León C, Rodrigues J, Gamboa de Domínguez N, Gut J, Rosenthal PJ: Synthesis and evaluation of new antimalarial phenylurenyl chalcone derivatives. J Med Chem. 2005, 48: 3654-3658. 10.1021/jm058208o.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. D de Andrade-Neto VF, Goulart MO, da Silva Filho JF, da Silva MJ, Pinto Mdo C, Pinto AV, Zalis MG, Carvalho LH, Krettli AU: Antimalarial activity of phenazines from lapachol, beta-lapachone and its derivatives against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro and Plasmodium berghei in vivo. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2004, 14: 1145-1149. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2003.12.069.Google Scholar
  96. Hilário FF, de Paula RC, Silveira ML, Viana GH, Alves RB, Pereira JR, Silva LM, de Freitas RP, de Pilla Varotti F: Synthesis and evaluation of antimalarial activity of oxygenated 3-alkylpyridine marine alkaloid analogues. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2011, 78: 477-482. 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01154.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Rodrigues JR, Gamboa de Domínguez N: Plasmodium berghei: in vitro and in vivo activity of dequalinium. Exp Parasitol. 2007, 115: 19-24. 10.1016/j.exppara.2006.05.002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Burrows JN, Leroy D, Lotharius J, Waterson D: Challenges in antimalarial drug discovery. Future Med Chem. 2011, 3: 1401-1412. 10.4155/fmc.11.91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Medicines for Malaria Venture. 2013, []
  100. Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, Lwin KM, Ariey F, Hanpithakpong W, Lee SJ, Ringwald P, Silamut K, Imwong M, Chotivanich K, Lim P, Herdman T, An SS, Yeung S, Singhasivanon P, Day NP, Lindegardh N, Socheat D, White NJ: Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 455-467. 10.1056/NEJMoa0808859.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Cheeseman IH, Miller BA, Nair S, Nkhoma S, Tan A, Tan JC, Al Saai S, Phyo AP, Moo CL, Lwin KM, McGready R, Ashley E, Imwong M, Stepniewska K, Yi P, Dondorp AM, Mayxay M, Newton PN, White NJ, Nosten F, Ferdig MT, Anderson TJ: A major genome region underlying artemisinin resistance in malaria. Science. 2012, 336: 79-82. 10.1126/science.1215966.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Noedl H, Socheat D, Satimai W: Artemisinin-resistant malaria in Asia. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 540-541. 10.1056/NEJMc0900231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Phyo AP, Nkhoma S, Stepniewska K, Ashley EA, Nair S, McGready R, Ler Moo C, Al-Saai S, Dondorp AM, Lwin KM, Singhasivanon P, Day NP, White NJ, Anderson TJ, Nosten F: Emergence of artemisinin-resistant malaria on the western border of Thailand: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2012, 379: 1960-1966. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60484-X.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. The malERA Consultative Group on Drugs: A research agenda for malaria eradication: Drugs. PLoS Med. 2011, 8: e1000402-PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  105. Schmidt TJ, Khalid SA, Romanha AJ, Alves TM, Biavatti MW, Brun R, Da Costa FB, de Castro SL, Ferreira VF, de Lacerda MV, Lago JH, Leon LL, Lopes NP, Das Neves Amorim RC, Niehues M, Ogungbe IV, Pohlit AM, Scotti MT, Setzer WN, De NC Soeiro M, Steindel M, Tempone AG: The potential of secondary metabolites from plants as drugs or leads against protozoan neglected diseases - part I&II. Curr Med Chem. 2012, 19: 2128-2228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Willcox ML, Graz B, Falquet J, Diakite C, Giani S, Diallo D: A “reverse pharmacology” approach for developing an anti-malarial phytomedicine. Malar J. 2011, 10: S8-10.1186/1475-2875-10-S1-S8.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Gamo FJ, Sanz LM, Vidal J, de Cozar C, Alvarez E, Lavandera JL, Vanderwall DE, Green DV, Kumar V, Hasan S, Brown JR, Peishoff CE, Cardon LR, Garcia-Bustos JF: Thousands of chemical starting points for antimalarial lead identification. Nature. 2010, 465: 305-310. 10.1038/nature09107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Guiguemde WA, Shelat AA, Garcia-Bustos JF, Diagana TT, Gamo FJ, Guy RK: Global phenotypic screening for antimalarials. Chem Biol. 2012, 19: 116-129. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.01.004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Sanz LM, Crespo B, De-Cózar C, Ding XC, Llergo JL, Burrows JN, García-Bustos JF, Gamo FJ: Plasmodium falciparum in vitro killing rates allow to discriminate between different antimalarial mode-of-action. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e30949-10.1371/journal.pone.0030949.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Ding XC, Ubben D, Wells TNC: A framework for assessing the risk of resistance for anti-malarials in development. Malar J. 2012, 11: 292-10.1186/1475-2875-11-292.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Delves M, Plouffe D, Scheurer C, Meister S, Wittlin S, Winzeler EA, Sinden RE, Leroy D: The activities of current antimalarial drugs on the life cycle stages of Plasmodium: a comparative study with human and rodent parasites. PLoS Med. 2012, 9: e1001169-10.1371/journal.pmed.1001169.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Dembele L, Gego A, Zeeman AM, Franetich JF, Silvie O, Rametti A, Le Grand R, Dereuddre-Bosquet N, Sauerwein R, van Gemert GJ, Vaillant JC, Thomas AW, Snounou G, Kocken CH, Mazier D: Towards an in vitro model of Plasmodium hypnozoites suitable for drug discovery. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e18162-10.1371/journal.pone.0018162.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar


© Cruz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.