Open Access

Identification and characterization of the merozoite surface protein 1 (msp1) gene in a host-generalist avian malaria parasite, Plasmodium relictum (lineages SGS1 and GRW4) with the use of blood transcriptome

  • Olof Hellgren1Email author,
  • Megan Kutzer2,
  • Staffan Bensch1,
  • Gediminas Valkiūnas3 and
  • Vaidas Palinauskas3
Malaria Journal201312:381

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-381

Received: 4 July 2013

Accepted: 24 October 2013

Published: 30 October 2013

Abstract

Background

The merozoite surface protein 1 (msp1) is one of the most studied vaccine candidate genes in mammalian Plasmodium spp. to have been used for investigations of epidemiology, population structures, and immunity to infections. However methodological difficulties have impeded the use of nuclear markers such as msp1 in Plasmodium parasites causing avian malaria. Data from an infection transcriptome of the host generalist avian malaria parasite Plasmodium relictum was used to identify and characterize the msp1 gene from two different isolates (mtDNA lineages SGS1 and GRW4). The aim was to investigate whether the msp1 gene in avian malaria species shares the properties of the msp1 gene in Plasmodium falciparum in terms of block variability, conserved anchor points and repeat motifs, and further to investigate the degree to which the gene might be informative in avian malaria parasites for population and epidemiological studies.

Methods

Reads from 454 sequencing of birds infected with avian malaria was used to develop Sanger sequencing protocols for the msp1 gene of P. relictum. Genetic variability between variable and conserved blocks of the gene was compared within and between avian malaria parasite species, including P. falciparum. Genetic variability of the msp1 gene in P. relictum was compared with six other nuclear genes and the mtDNA gene cytochrome b.

Results

The msp1 gene of P. relictum shares the same general pattern of variable and conserved blocks as found in P. falciparum, although the variable blocks exhibited less variability than P. falciparum. The variation across the gene blocks in P. falciparum spanned from being as conserved as within species variation in P. relictum to being as variable as between the two avian malaria species (P. relictum and Plasmodium gallinaceum) in the variable blocks. In P. relictum the highly conserved p19 region of the peptide was identified, which included two epidermal growth factor-like domains and a fully conserved GPI anchor point.

Conclusion

This study provides protocols for evaluation of the msp1 gene in the avian malaria generalist parasite P. relictum. The msp1 gene in avian Plasmodium shares the genetic properties seen in P. falciparum, indicating evolutionary conserved functions for the gene. The data on the variable blocks of the gene show that the msp1 gene in P. relictum might serve as a good candidate gene for future population and epidemiological studies of the parasite.

Keywords

Avian malaria Merozoite surface protein 1 Genetic variation Plasmodium relictum SGS1 GRW4

Background

There are more than 50 morphologically described species of Plasmodium that infect birds (i.e., causing avian malaria) throughout the world, but there may be several thousand evolutionary independent lineages that act as separate species on their avian hosts [1]. For over a decade molecular studies have been conducted on avian malaria. These were primarily based on cytochrome b diversity (different cytochrome b haplotypes are hereafter referred to as cyt b lineages) and in a few cases combined with a handful of other nuclear and mtDNA genes [13]. By combining published data on avian malaria parasites in communal databases, a vast lineage diversity, as well as remarkable host ranges and geographic spread of some parasite species has been observed [4]. One of the well-known, morphologically defined parasites, Plasmodium relictum, consists of several different lineages (e g, SGS1, GRW4, GRW11, LZFUS01), is found on all continents except Antarctica and is transmitted in both tropical and temperate regions [5]. One of the lineages (GRW4) belonging to this taxonomically defined species has caused major population declines when invading endemic bird fauna [6]. Plasmodium relictum also exhibits extraordinary levels of host generalism; the lineages SGS1 and GRW4 have been found in 50 bird species belonging to 15 different families and 53 species belonging to 17 families, respectively (MalAvi data base 2013-06-04 [4]). But how has this parasite spread around the globe and into so many bird species? In order to comprehend these processes there is a need for variable genetic markers as well as an understanding of the genetic variation of genes involved in the invasion stage of the host cells.

The vaccine candidate gene, merozoite surface protein 1 (msp1) is one of the more variable genes found in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum[7]. Within P. falciparum the msp1 gene encodes a 190 kDa protein that is cleaved into four polypeptides of different length (p83, p42, p38 and p30) during erythrocytic merogony (i.e., schizogony) [8]. These four peptides are bound together on the surface of the merozoite during adhesion to the host’s erythrocyte and are anchored to the parasite’s membrane via glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) located in the p42 fragment [9]. During erythrocyte invasion, the p42 peptide is cleaved into two new polypeptides, p33 and p19, resulting in the loss of the merozoite’s peptide coat. Once inside the erythrocyte, p19 is all that remains of msp1[10]. Several studies have found that antibodies to the p19 peptide frequently occur in populations with high malaria prevalence and can be associated with immunity to the parasite [11, 12]. Further, due to the high variability of the gene, msp1 has frequently been used to infer population structures and understand the epidemiology of primate malaria parasites [7, 1315]. Apart from the different polypeptide fragments, the msp1 gene has been divided into 17 different blocks based on variability of the amino acid composition. Of these 17 blocks, six are conserved, four are semi-conserved, six are variable and one block consists of repetitive elements [16].

Obtaining data on nuclear genes involved in the host invasion process has been notoriously difficult in avian malaria parasites due to the fact that the hosts (i. e., birds) have nucleated erythrocytes and the genome sizes between the host and parasite differ 52-fold. However, during erythrocytic merogony, (i.e., when the parasites undergo asexual reproduction in the blood stream and invade numerous new red blood cells (RBCs)), genetic activity in the parasites is high [17, 18], thus making it possible to utilize mRNA sequencing in order to acquire sequence data of nuclear genes of the parasites [19].

By using expressed sequence data from a partially sequenced transcriptome of birds infected with the SGS1 lineage of P. relictum[19] it was possible to: 1) identify and develop Sanger sequencing protocols for msp1 in P. relictum and, 2) investigate the degree to which the msp1 gene in avian malaria parasites shares the characteristics of the msp1 gene found in P. falciparum, which makes it a good candidate gene for future population studies and investigations focusing on the RBC invasion mechanisms across diverse malaria parasite species.

Methods

msp1 identification and sequencing

Plasmodium gallinaceum msp1 (AJ809338.1) was used as a reference sequence against which all raw reads from the partial transcriptome of SGS1 reads (SRA number SRR834578, [19]) were blasted against using Geneious 6.1. Reads with an E-value scored below 1e-10 were kept and used for potential primer sites. Primers were constructed using the primer design tool implemented in Geneious 6.1. Primers were tested and optimized using a sample of SGS1 (host is the Crossbill Loxia curvirostra) with high parasitaemia as well as a sample from a Great Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) infected with GRW4. The lineage GRW4 also belongs to the morphologically defined species of P. relictum, but differs by 2.3% on the cyt b gene. Both samples originated from infection experiments in which the individuals were controlled for not having multiple infections using both microscopy and PCR methods [20]. For both of the samples, genomic DNA was extracted from a small blood sample using an ammonium acetate protocol according to Richardson et al. [21]. Primers were located according to Figure 1 and listed in Additional file 1. PCR reactions were performed in 10 μl reactions using a Qiagen multiplex PCR kit. For each sample 5 μl PCR ready reaction mix was used together with 2.6 μl ddH2O, 0.2 μl of each primer (10 μM) and 2 μl of DNA template of a concentration of 25 ng/μl. The PCR temperature profile was 95°C for 15 min followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, annealing temperature according to Additional file 1 for 90 sec and 72°C for 90 sec, the cycle was followed by a step of 72°C for 10 min. Positive amplifications were identified using 2 μl of the samples on a 2% agarose gel. PCR products from positive amplifications were precipitated and both the forward and reverse strands were sequenced using BigDye on an ABI 3100 sequencer.
Figure 1

Primer sites (Forward: dark green arrow, Reverse: light green arrows) along the msp1 gene. Amplified fragments with corresponding primer pairs (Additional file 1) are represented by dashed lines.

Table 1

Amino acid similarity (%) between different Plasmodium species/lineages

Block

X

Pg/SGS1

Pf/SGS1

Pg/Pf

SGS1/GRW4

Pf amino acid positions

Pg amino acid positions

All

 

49.8

32.9

33.7

89.9

whole

whole

1

c

44.4

34.1**

46.4

ND

1–55

1–56

2

r

-

-

-

-

56–111

-

3

c

62.9

41.3

42.7

84.7*

112–313

57–255

4

v

39.1

28.1

21.9

86.4

314–345

256–277

5

c

62.9

60

74.3

97.1

346–380

278–312

6

v

44.9

25.8

25.4

93.7

381–609

313–536

7

sc

55.4

48.6

50

93.2

610–682

537–610

8

V1

36.1

14.4

16.3

84.7

683–779

611–717

9

sc

62.6

49.5

52.3

96.3

780–886

718–824

10

v

32.6

17.4

19.7

88.3

887–1024

825–953

11

sc

54.3

48.6

42.9

91.4

1,025–1,059

954–988

12

c

57.5

51.2

50.6

97.5

1,060–1,138

989–1,067

13

sc

52.2

45.2

39.3

96.4

1,139–1,222

1,068–1,149

14

v

20.8

14.9

12.7

76.1

1,223–1,288

1,150–1,220

15

c

44.6

42.2

37.1

89

1,289–1,316

1,221–1,308

16

v

54.8

27.9

29.1

98*

1,317–1,602

1,309–1,528

17

c

66

51.5

50.5

ND

1,603–1,702

1,529–1,622

Plasmodiun gallinaceum (Pg), Plasmodium relictum lineage SGS1 (SGS1), Plasmodium relictum lineage GRW4 (GRW4), Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) Plasmodium yoelii (Py).

Row X shows whether a block had been described previously as conserved (c), including repetitive motifs (r), variable (v) or semi-conserved (sc). The positions of the blocks are described in the last two columns after aligning P. falciparum (X05624.2) and P. gallinaceum (AJ809338.1).

**only partial sequence of SGS1, *only partial sequence of GRW4, ND: No sequence of the block in GRW4, - block is lacking for SGS1, GRW4 and Pg. Blocks were assigned according to Tanabe et al. [16]. 1According to Rich and Ayala this block is also containing repetitive sections [22].

For the SGS1 lineage, the end and beginning of the msp1 gene was obtained using the 454 transcriptome reads [19]. (Reads can be found at NCBI Sequence Read Archive under project number: PRJNA196990; SRR834578).

Translated msp1 sequences of SGS1 and GRW4 were aligned against P. gallinaceum (AJ809338.1) and P. falciparum (AL844508) using CLUSTAL W as implemented in Geneious 6.1.

Genetic analysis

In P. falciparum the msp1 gene has been divided into 17 different blocks depending on amino acid variability [16]. The ortholog blocks between P. gallinaceum vs P. relictum (SGS1), P. gallinaceum vs P. falciparum MAD20 isolate (CAA29112.2), P. relictum (SGS1) vs P. falciparum MAD20 isolate (CAA29112.2), P. relictum (SGS1) vs P. relictum (GRW4) and P. falciparum MAD20 isolate (CAA29112.2) vs K1 isolate (P04932) were evaluated in order to elucidate whether the msp1 gene in avian Plasmodium lineages exhibit similar properties in variability as seen in P. falciparum. The properties of the different blocks were evaluated by percent amino acid similarity. A second goal was to identify which block of the msp1 gene exhibited large variation in order to find sections of the gene that have the potential to be used for future population studies of avian Plasmodium parasites.

Nuclear reference genes

In mammalian Plasmodium species, high variability in msp1 in relation to other genes has been well documented [13, 14, 16]. However, the msp1 gene in avian malaria parasites might have evolved under fundamentally different selection regimes than in mammalian malaria species due to differences in the physiology of the hosts. Moreover, P. relictum is an extreme host generalist [4], which might further contribute to a different selection regime compared to the host specialist P. falciparum. Therefore, in order to evaluate how variable the msp1 gene is in relation to other nuclear genes in the P. relictum genome, six more PCR protocols for amplification of nuclear genes were developed. Transcriptome data of SGS1 (PRJNA196990; SRR834578) was used to identify primer sites for the genes; eukaryotic initiation factor-4A (eIF4A), Myosin A (MyoA), asparagine-rich antigen (Asp), skeletal protein IMC1-related (IMC1), transmission-blocking target antigen s230 precursor (Ps230) and a conserved Plasmodium spp. protein with unknown function (PF08_0073). For all genes except IMC1 and PF08_0073, nested PCR protocols were applied using the primers and annealing temperatures presented in Additional file 2. PCR reactions and PCR cycling profiles followed the protocol by Hellgren et al. [2].

Genetic variability as percent nucleotide differences was calculated between SGS1/GRW4 and SGS1/P. gallinaceum, for the sequenced nuclear genes, mtDNA cyt b (accession numbers P. gallinaceum: AB599930.1, SGS1: JX196867 and GRW4: AF254975) the full msp1 gene and block 14 of the msp1 gene as implemented in Geneious 6.1. Further, the sequence divergence of the cyt b and msp1 block 14 between SGS1/GRW4, SGS1/P. gallinaceum was calculated using a Kimura 2-parameter model with uniform rates as implemented in MEGA 5.0.

Phylogenetic analysis

A phylogenetic tree from the msp1 gene was constructed using the translated sequences (due to the high variability at the nucleotide level at several of the different blocks) of 13 Plasmodium spp. (P. gallinaceum AJ809338.1, Plasmodium chabaudi AB379641.1, Plasmodium malariae FJ824669.1, Plasmodium ovale wallikeri KC137340.1, Plasmodium ovale curtisi KC137349.1, Plasmodium fragile AB444068.1, Plasmodium vivax AF435593.1, Plasmodium knowlesi AB444050.1, P. falciparum MAD20 isolate (X05624.2), P. falciparum K1 isolate (X03371.1), Plasmodium reichenowi (AJ786604.1), P. relictum (SGS1) KC969175 and P. relictum (GRW4) KC969176). The msp1 gene consists of several repeat regions as well as highly variable regions, which makes alignments of the gene problematic. In order to reduce bias due to faulty alignments only conserved regions of the gene were used for the final phylogenetic analysis. For these regions (indicated with green bars) and alignment, see Additional file 3. The protein sequences were aligned using MUSCLE with eight iterations as implemented in Geneious ver. 6.1 The protein phylogeny was constructed using a Maximum Likelihood approach as implemented in PHYML [23] with a Blosum62 substitution model and a NNi Topology search. A consensus phylogeny with supporting bootstrap values was estimated using 1,000 iterations.

Ethical approval

Care and handling of experimental animals was in accordance with the current laws of Lithuania (Lithuanian State Food and Veterinary Service, Ref. No. 2012/01/04-0221.

Results

Identification and characterisation of the msp1 gene in Plasmodium relictum

With the use of a partially sequenced transcriptome of birds infected with P. relictum (SGS1) sufficient reads along the msp1 gene were identified in order to develop PCR protocols for Sanger sequencing of 4,273 bp of the total 4,869 bp length of the gene (P. gallinaceum). The protocols amplified msp1 fragments for both the lineages SGS1 and GRW4. For SGS1, 319 bp at the start of the 3′end and 147 bp located in the last part of the 5′ end was identified and concatenated using raw sequence reads from the transcriptome [19]. It should be noted that the SGS1 lineage sequenced for the transcriptome originates from the same location as the Sanger sequenced SGS1 lineage in this study and are thus likely to exhibit identical sequences at the 3′ and 5′ ends. The resulting concatenated sequence length for SGS1 was 4,739 bp (Accession number: KC969175) and for GRW4 3,596 bp (Accession number: KC969176). The sequences were translated and the similarity at the amino acid level across the full SGS1 gene was 33.2% vs P. falciparum MAD20, 50.4% vs. P. gallinaceum and 89.9% vs P. relictum (GRW4).

Similarity in block variability and identification of msp1 (p19)

Within P. falciparum, the msp1 gene has been defined based on 17 different blocks that show differences in amino acid variability. The corresponding blocks in P. gallinaceum, P. relictum (SGS1) and P. relictum (GRW4) were identified (for positions of blocks see Table 1). Both P. gallinaceum and P. relictum (SGS1) seem to lack block 2 completely, which is a region that exhibits large population variation between different strains of P. falciparum. For P. relictum (GRW4), it was not possible to sequence the 5′ end of gene and the absence of block 2 could not be verified.

Comparing the variability of the different blocks between P. falciparum (MAD20 vs K1), P. gallinaceum vs P. relictum (SGS1) and P. relictum (SGS1 vs GRW4) showed similar patterns of which blocks being the most variable (Table 1, Figure 2). For the more distantly related avian malaria species (P. gallinaceum vs P. relictum (SGS1)) the pattern across the different blocks was similar to the P. falciparum MAD20 vs K1 comparison with the same blocks being variable or conserved except for block 16, which did not seem to be as variable as in P. falciparum (Table 1, Figure 2). For the close lineage comparison (P. relictum (SGS1) vs P. relictum (GRW4)), again similar patterns of variability occur, although clearly showing less variation. The blocks that show the greatest variability are blocks 14, 8, 10 and 3, with block 14 being the most variable, which is comparable to variation found in P. falciparum. The most conserved regions between the avian malaria lineages were 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 16 and 17 (Table 1, Figure 2). One of the most conserved regions between SGS1/P. gallinaceum and SGS1/P. falciparum was block 17, which includes the region encoding the p19 peptide (Figure 3) that anchors to the merozoite cell membrane and is maintained during RBC invasion.
Figure 2

Aligned amino acid sequences of Plasmodium gallinaceum (Pg), Plasmodium relictum lineage SGS1 (Pr) and Plasmodium falciparum (Pf). Bars on top represent amino acid similarities: green: 100% identity, brown >30 < 100%, red <30% similarity. Blocks 1–17 are assigned according to Tanabe et al. [16] [compare Table 1 legend], blue: conserved, white: repetitive region; red, variable and green: semi-conserved region. Amino acid similarity (%) for the different block; solid line with filled circles: P. relictum (SGS1 vs GRW4), solid line with open circles: P. gallinaceum (Pg) vs P. relictum (SGS1) and dashed line with X: P. falciparum MAD20 isolate (X05624.2) vs K1 isolate (X03371.1).

Figure 3

Amino acid alignment of the msp1 -p19 fragment between P. relictum (SGS1) and P. falciparum (MAD20 isolate X05624.2). Dashed lines with black boxes represent conserved cysteine motifs with corresponding disulphide bonds forming, for the region, the two characteristic epithelia growth factor-like epitopes. Arrow indicates the anchor point in the merozoite membrane with the conserved “FCSS” motif surrounding the anchor point (red box).

msp1 variability in relation to other nuclear genes

The genetic dissimilarity between P. relictum (SGS1) and P. gallinaceum based on six nuclear genes, not including msp1, (Accession numbers KF026619-KF026630) and one mitochondrial gene (cyt b) ranged between 5.5 and 13.2% and 1.2 and 2.3% between lineages SGS1 and GRW4. For the whole msp1 gene, the corresponding values were 26.5 and 4.1%. For msp1 block 14, the same comparisons were as high as 36.9 and 11.1%, respectively (Figure 4). Using a Kimura 2-parameter model, the calculated rate of molecular change between P. relictum (SGS1 and GRW4) was 0.023 for cyt b and 0.122 for msp1 block 14. The same comparison between P. relictum (SGS1) and P. gallinaceum gave rates of 0.063 and 0.648 respectively. When taken together these rates indicate a 5–10 fold higher rate of molecular change in the msp1 block 14 region compared to the rate observed in the cyt b gene.
Figure 4

Comparison of nuclear sequence divergence (%) for six nuclear genes, the cytochrome b gene, the whole msp1 gene and block 14 of the msp1 gene between P. relictum (SGS1) and P. relictum (GRW4) (X-axis) and between P. relictum (SGS1) and P. gallinaceum on Y-axis.

Phylogenetic analysis of ten Plasmodium spp

The ML tree of the protein alignments showed that avian msp1 forms a well-supported, monophyletic group that has diverged significantly from mammalian Plasmodium species (Figure 5), with the two P. relictum lineages being less divergent than the P. falciparum isolates (isolates MAD20 and K1).
Figure 5

Maximum likelihood consensus phylogeny of the translated msp1 gene from 12 different malaria species. Numbers on the branches represent bootstrap values based on 1,000 iterations.

Discussion

Malaria parasites (i.e., Plasmodium spp.) are found to infect a huge diversity of hosts, including birds, mammals and reptiles. By understanding how genes taking part in the invasion of host cells and tissues have evolved across this vast host range might help us to identify genes and processes that are evolutionarily constrained or are of importance for limiting a parasite to one or several host species. One such gene that is involved in the invasion process is msp1. The msp1 gene encodes for one of the most abundant proteins on the surface of the merozoite (the stage of the parasite that invades the RBC of the host), and is thought to be involved in the initial adhesion to the RBC. This gene is, therefore, highly important for the understanding of invasion biology of malaria parasites as well as for the understanding of how genes involved in the invasion of the host have evolved across different host ranges.

This study identified and investigated the msp1 gene originating from two different cyt b lineages of the avian malaria parasite P. relictum (SGS1 and GRW4). The phylogeny of the msp1 peptides placed the avian malaria parasites into a strongly supported monophyletic cluster. Two P. relictum lineages showed a genetic divergence below that found between different P. falciparum isolates MAD20 and K1. The genetic distance between P. relictum/P. gallinaceum exceeded the genetic distance seen between P. falciparum (K1)/P. reichenowi (Figure 5).

Similar patterns of conserved and variable blocks were found across the gene when comparing the block variability observed between P. relictum (SGS1)/P. gallinaceum with the variability between the two different P. falciparum isolates (Figure 2). In addition, when comparing the msp1 haplotypes of P. relictum (SGS1 and GRW4), the same blocks that have been defined as being variable in P. falciparum[16] were also the most variable in this comparison. These similarities might indicate that the properties and function of the avian malaria msp1 gene is similar to the mammalian malaria msp1. However, when comparing the degree of variation in the different blocks between the two different msp1 isolates of P. falciparum (MAD20/K1) some of the conserved blocks (block 3, 5 and 12, Figure 2) were as conserved as between the two P. relictum lineages (representing the same morphological defined species), while some of the variable blocks (block 4, 6, 8, 10, and 16, Figure 2) showed variability that exceeded that found between two distinctly different avian malaria parasite species (P. relictum/P. gallinaceum). This variability exceeded that of P. relictum/P. gallinaceum although the overall genetic distance between the P. relictum/P. gallinaceum msp1 gene is bigger than that between P. falciparum (K1)/P. reichenowi (Figure 5). The differences in the degree of within species variability at the variable blocks might indicate different selection pressures acting upon the different regions in P. relictum compared to P. falciparum. However, in order to make comparisons between the two species and to know how and in what direction selection has acted upon the avian malaria gene, there is a need for larger population studies of the msp1 gene. Larger population samples are needed in order to pinpoint sections of stabilising versus diversifying selection as well as being able to compare the degree of allelic polymorphism between the two.

Molecular characterization of avian malaria strains has, to date, mainly utilized cyt b sequences [2, 4, 24], together with a handful of nuclear genes, of which none show nuclear variation below the defined cyt b lineages [1, 3]. In order to understand the epidemiology of avian malaria parasites that have large geographical transmission areas [4, 25] as well as broad host ranges [26], there is a need for more variable nuclear markers. Although msp1 block 2, which is often used for population studies in human malaria species, seems to be absent in avian malaria, other parts of the gene might well serve as useful molecular markers for inferring population structures below the level of cyt b lineages, in avian malaria. One such marker might be msp1 gene block 14. Block 14 has diversified 5.3 and 10.2 times faster between P. relictum lineages SGS1/GRW4 and SGS1/P. gallinaceum, respectively, compared to the divergence rate of the cyt b gene. It is important to note that the block diversification rate observed in Block 14 in the current study may change when including more isolates and lineages of P. relictum. Still, it might serve as a good starting point for future studies wishing to examine the epidemiology and population structure of P. relictum.

During merozoite formation the msp1 peptide is anchored to the parasite membrane via glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) located at C-terminus of the protein. The GPI anchors are the last remaining part of the peptide (p19) during erythrocyte invasion. For P. relictum (SGS1), it was possible to identify the full 3′ end of the peptide; within this region the GPI anchor point was fully conserved at the amino acid level between P. falciparum, P. gallinaceum and P. relictum (SGS1) with the characteristic “FCSSS” motif (Figure 3). The “FCSSS” motif has been found to be extremely conserved across almost all investigated species of malariae parasites [27] and this was also the case when including more lineages of avian malariae species. In the p19 section of the avian malaria parasite peptides, it was also possible to identify the two epidermal growth factor-like domains (EGF), based on the six conserved characteristic cysteine residues [28] (Figure 3). In P. falciparum, the cysteine residues form disulphide bonds, which create a conserved structure similar to that of the epidermal growth factor-like domains. These conserved epitopes are acted upon by the host’s immune system through antibodies that provide the host with protective immunity against malaria. To some extent, antibodies against the p19 epitopes can give the host cross-immunity to other malaria strains. In the bird-malaria parasite system it is common that bird species can be infected with a broad diversity of different malaria species and lineages [2931]. Within this system, msp1-p19 would be a promising target for investigating cross-immunity between different species and changes of this cross-immunity depending on the phylogenetic distance of the parasite. Further, P. relictum has caused large population declines and mortality in endemic host communities, when introduced into formerly parasite-free areas (e.g., Hawaii) [3234]. Here, msp1-p19 could be used as a candidate gene to investigate whether individual birds that survive malaria infection carry antibodies against this peptide, in order to examine whether diverse host species target the same structures and pathways in the parasite when fighting the disease.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council, the Crafoord Foundation (grant number 621-2011-3548 and 20120630 respectively, to OH), and the European Social Fund under the Global Grant measure (grant VPI-3.1.-ŠMM-07-K-01-047 to GV).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
MEEL Department of Biology, Lund University
(2)
Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
(3)
Institute of Ecology, Nature Research Centre

References

  1. Bensch S, Perez-Tris J, Waldenstrom J, Hellgren O: Linkage between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences in avian malaria parasites: multiple cases of cryptic speciation?. Evolution. 2004, 58: 1617-1621.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hellgren O, Waldenström J, Bensch S: A new PCR assay for simultaneous studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from avian blood. J Parasitol. 2004, 90: 797-802. 10.1645/GE-184R1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Martinsen ES, Perkins SL, Schall JJ: A three-genome phylogeny of malaria parasites (Plasmodium and closely related genera): evolution of life-history traits and host switches. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008, 47: 261-273. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bensch S, Hellgren O, Pérez-Tris J: MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009, 9: 1353-1358. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02692.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Valkiūnas G: Avian Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia. 2005, Boca Raton: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson CT, Van Riper C: Pathogenicity and epizootiology of avian haematozoa: Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon, and Haemoproteus. Bird-parasite interaction. Edited by: Loye JT, Zuk M. 1991, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19-48.Google Scholar
  7. Barry AE, Schultz L, Buckee CO, Reeder JC: Contrasting population structures of the genes encoding ten leading vaccine-candidate antigens of the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4: e8497-10.1371/journal.pone.0008497.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Child MA, Epp C, Bujard H, Blackman MJ: Regulated maturation of malaria merozoite surface protein-1 is essential for parasite growth. Mol Microbiol. 2010, 78: 187-202.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerold P, Schofield L, Blackman MJ, Holder AA, Schwarz RT: Structural analysis of the glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol membrane anchor of the merozoite surface proteins-1 and -2 of Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996, 75: 131-143. 10.1016/0166-6851(95)02518-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackman MJ, Heidrich HG, Donachie S, McBride JS, Holder AA: A single fragment of a malaria merozoite surface protein remains on the parasite during red cell invasion and is the target of invasion-inhibiting antibodies. J Exp Med. 1990, 172: 379-382. 10.1084/jem.172.1.379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hui G, Hashimoto C: Plasmodium falciparum anti-msp1-19 antibodies induced by msp1-42 and msp1-19 based vaccines differed in specificity and parasite growth inhibition in terms of recognition of conserved versus variant epitopes. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 948-956. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.08.041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ngoundou-Landji J, Nwuba RI, Anumudu CI, Odaibo AB, Matondo Maya WD, Awobode HO, Okafor CM, Morenikeji OA, Asinobi A, Nwagwu M, Holder AA, Ntoumi F: Fine specificity of anti-msp119 antibodies and multiplicity of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 1 types in individuals in Nigeria with sub-microscopic infection. Malar J. 2010, 9: 287-10.1186/1475-2875-9-287.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Noranate N, Prugnolle F, Jouin H, Tall A, Marrama L, Sokhna C, Ekala M-T, Guillotte M, Bischoff E, Bouchier C, Patarapotikul J, Ohashi J, Trape J-F, Rogier C, Mercereau-Puijalon O: Population diversity and antibody selective pressure to Plasmodium falciparum msp1 block2 locus in an African malaria-endemic setting. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9: 219-10.1186/1471-2180-9-219.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tanabe K, Sakihama N, Rooth I, Björkman A, Färnert A: High frequency of recombination-driven allelic diversity and temporal variation of Plasmodium falciparum msp1 in Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 76: 1037-1045.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pacheco MA, Reid MJC, Schillaci MA, Lowenberger CA, Galdikas BMF, Jones-Engel L, Escalante AA: The origin of malarial parasites in orangutans. PLoS ONE. 2012, 7: e34990-10.1371/journal.pone.0034990.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tanabe K, Mackay M, Goman M, Scaife JG: Allelic dimorphism in a surface antigen gene of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. J Mol Biol. 1987, 195: 273-287. 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90649-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bozdech Z, Llinas M, Pulliam BL, Wong ED, Zhu JC, DeRisi JL: The transcriptome of the intraerythrocytic developmental cycle of Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Biol. 2003, 1: 85-100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Otto TD, Wilinski D, Assefa S, Keane TM, Sarry LR, Böhme U, Lemieux J, Barrell B, Pain A, Berriman M, Newbold C, Llinás M: New insights into the blood-stage transcriptome of Plasmodium falciparum using RNA-Seq. Mol Microbiol. 2010, 76: 12-24. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07026.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bensch S, Coltman DW, Davis CS, Hellgren O, Johansson T, Malenfant RM, Moore SS, Palinauskas V, Valkiūnas G, Genomic Resources Development Consortium: Genomic resources notes accepted 1 June 2013–31 July 2013. Mol Ecol Resour. 2013, doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12166Google Scholar
  20. Perez-Tris J, Bensch S: Diagnosing genetically diverse avian malarial infections using mixed-sequence analysis and TA-cloning. Parasitology. 2005, 131: 15-23. 10.1017/S003118200500733X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Richardson DS, Jury FL, Blaakmeer K, Komdeur J, Burke T: Parentage assignment and extra-group paternity in a cooperative breeder: the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Mol Ecol. 2001, 10: 2263-2273. 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01355.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rich SM, Ayala FJ: Population structure and recent evolution of Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 6994-7001. 10.1073/pnas.97.13.6994.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Guindon S, Gascuel O: A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003, 52: 696-704. 10.1080/10635150390235520.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Waldenstrom J, Bensch S, Hasselquist D, Ostman O: A new nested polymerase chain reaction method very efficient in detecting Plasmodium and Haemoproteus infections from avian blood. J Parasitol. 2004, 90: 191-194. 10.1645/GE-3221RN.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Beadell JS, Ishtiaq F, Covas R, Melo M, Warren BH, Atkinson CT, Bensch S, Graves GR, Jhala YV, Peirce MA, Rahmani AR, Fonseca DM, Fleischer RC: Global phylogeographic limits of Hawaii’s avian malaria. Proc Biol Sci. 2006, 273: 2935-2944. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3671.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hellgren O, Pérez-Tris J, Bensch S: A jack-of-all-trades and still a master of some: prevalence and host range in avian malaria and related blood parasites. Ecology. 2009, 90: 2840-2849. 10.1890/08-1059.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Birkenmeyer L, Muerhoff AS, Dawson GJ, Desai SM: Isolation and characterization of the msp1 genes from Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010, 82: 996-1003. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0022.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Blackman MJ, Ling IT, Nicholls SC, Holder AA: Proteolytic processing of the Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 produces a membrane-bound fragment containing two epidermal growth factor-like domains. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1991, 49: 29-33. 10.1016/0166-6851(91)90127-R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hellgren O, Wood MJ, Waldenstrom J, Hasselquist D, Ottosson U, Stervander M, Bensch S: Circannual variation in blood parasitism in a sub-Saharan migrant passerine bird, the garden warbler. J Evol Biol. 2013, 26: 1047-1059. 10.1111/jeb.12129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Westerdahl H, Waldenstrom J, Hansson B, Hasselquist D, Schantz von T, Bensch S: Associations between malaria and MHC genes in a migratory songbird. Proc Biol Sci. 2005, 272: 1511-1518. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3113.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pérez-Tris J, Hellgren O, Krizanauskiene A, Waldenström J, Secondi J, Bonneaud C, Fjeldså J, Hasselquist D, Bensch S: Within-host speciation of malaria parasites. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2: e235-10.1371/journal.pone.0000235.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jarvi SI, Farias ME, Atkinson CT: Genetic characterization of Hawaiian isolates of Plasmodium relictum reveals mixed-genotype infections. Biol Direct. 2008, 3:Google Scholar
  33. Atkinson CT, Dusek RJ, Lease JK: Serological responses and immunity to superinfection with avian malaria in experimentally-infected Hawaii Amakihi. J Wildl Dis. 2001, 37: 20-27. 10.7589/0090-3558-37.1.20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Jarvi SI, Farias MEM, Baker H, Freifeld HB, Baker PE, Van Gelder E, Massey JG, Atkinson CT: Detection of avian malaria (Plasmodium spp.) in native land birds of American Samoa. Conserv Genet. 2003, 4: 629-637. 10.1023/A:1025626529806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hellgren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement