Open Access

In vitro activity of immunosuppressive drugs against Plasmodium falciparum

  • Luzia Veletzky1,
  • Khalid Rehman1,
  • Tilman Lingscheid1, 2,
  • Wolfgang Poeppl1,
  • Felix Loetsch1,
  • Heinz Burgmann1 and
  • Michael Ramharter1, 3Email author
Malaria Journal201413:476

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-476

Received: 11 November 2014

Accepted: 27 November 2014

Published: 4 December 2014

Abstract

Background

Solid organ transplant recipients are particularly vulnerable for infectious diseases due to prolonged immunosuppressive treatment. Residents of endemic regions and travellers may be exposed to malaria and may, therefore, require prolonged antimalarial chemoprophylaxis. The hypothesis of this study was that certain immunosuppressive drugs may exert clinically relevant anti-malarial activity. It was therefore designed to assess the intrinsic anti-malarial activity of everolimus, mycophenolic acid, and rapamycin against Plasmodium falciparum in an in vitro model.

Methods

Three laboratory adapted clones of P. falciparum and two isolates were used to assess the potential of mycophenolic acid, rapamycin and everolimus to inhibit in vitro growth of P. falciparum. The standard histidine rich protein 2 assay was employed and inhibitory drug concentrations (IC) were computed by non-linear regression analysis.

Results

All drugs were associated with complete inhibition of P. falciparum growth in in vitro assays. Mycophenolic acid demonstrated IC50 and IC90 values of 5.4 μmol/L and 15.3 μmol/L. Rapamycin inhibited P. falciparum growth at 7.2 μmol/L (IC50) and 12.5 μmol/L (IC90), respectively. Finally, everolimus displayed IC50 and IC90 values of 6.2 μmol/L and 11.5 μmol/L. There was no difference in in vitro activity against chloroquine sensitive or chloroquine resistant parasites.

Conclusions

All immunosuppressive drugs evaluated in this in vitro study demonstrated activity against P. falciparum. Inhibitory concentrations of mycophenolic acid are within clinically achievable plasma concentrations when used in solid organ transplant recipients. Further in vivo evaluation of mycophenolic acid either alone or in combination regimens may prove promising for the concomitant prevention of P. falciparum in solid organ transplant recipients living or travelling in malaria endemic regions.

Keywords

Plasmodium falciparum ImmunosuppressivesMycophenolic acidRapamycinEverolimus

Background

Despite international efforts to control and ultimately eliminate malaria, Plasmodium falciparum remains among the three most deadly infectious pathogens in sub-Saharan Africa causing an estimated 627,000 deaths every year [1]. One of the most formidable challenges in the fight against falciparum malaria is the ongoing emergence and spread of drug resistant isolates leading to reduced efficacy and effectiveness of established anti-malarial therapies [2]. Large-scale in vitro screening of drug candidates is performed to discover new compounds with anti-malarial activity [3]. However, only a fraction of those with proven in vitro activity are successfully developed to a marketed drug mostly due to concerns with safety and tolerability in preclinical or clinical development. Screening of drugs already used in clinical practice for other indications than malaria is another valuable approach to build-up the anti-malarial armamentarium. Drugs which are used for chronic conditions necessitating lifelong treatment may be of particular interest for their use as anti-malarial prophylactic agents.

The ever growing number of patients requiring immunosuppressive therapy after solid organ transplantation is particularly vulnerable for infectious diseases. Whereas rapamycin – commonly referred to as sirolimus – and cyclosporine A have been shown to exhibit anti-malarial activity in vitro, no conclusive data are available for everolimus and mycophenolic acid – two of the most widely used immunosuppressive drugs [4]. An immunosuppressive combination treatment with collateral prophylactic efficacy against malaria would constitute an important benefit for solid organ transplant recipients in malaria endemic regions and travellers to tropical countries. This would be of even higher clinical benefit as immunosuppressive drugs are prone to clinically significant drug interactions and the interaction of anti-malarials and immunosuppressive drugs is currently not well understood. This study was, therefore, designed to assess the in vitro activity of mycophenolic acid, everolimus and rapamycin against P. falciparum to obtain further information about the potential of currently used immunosuppressives as anti-malarial prophylactic drugs.

Methods

Laboratory strains and clones

The study was performed with three P. falciparum clones with distinct anti-malarial resistance patterns (Dd2, 3D7 and 7G8) and two laboratory-adapted strains from returning travellers. Clones Dd2 and 7G8 are resistant against chloroquine, whereas 3D7 sensitive to all commonly used anti-malarials [5]. Laboratory adapted strains originated from two returning travellers who acquired P. falciparum infections in West Africa. These strains demonstrate high level resistance against chloroquine but are sensitive against mefloquine and artemisinin derivatives. Parasites were kept in continuous malaria culture as described previously [6].

Test compounds

Chloroquine diphosphate salt (Sigma, C6628) was dissolved in double distilled water. Mycophenolic acid (Fluka, 70018), rapamycin (Sigma, R0395) and everolimus (Fluka, 07741) were dissolved in absolute ethanol. All stock solutions were further diluted in double distilled water to obtain respective target concentrations. 96-well culture plates were coated with ascending concentrations of chloroquine (0.003-3 μmol/L), mycophenolic acid (0.6-39 μmol/L), rapamycin (0.2- 13.7 μmol/L) and everolimus (0.2-13 μmol/L). Test plates were dried and kept at 4°C for a maximum of two weeks before use. All drug assays were performed in duplicate with all P. falciparum clones and strains.

Drug sensitivity assay

Cultured parasites were incubated for 72 hours on pre-coated plates and drug sensitivity assays were performed using an ELISA for quantitative measurement of the P. falciparum specific histidine rich protein 2 (HRP-2). ELISA plates were coated with commercial monoclonal antibodies and tests were performed as previously described [7]. An at least four-fold increase in HRP-2 concentrations was set as threshold for further statistical analysis of drug sensitivity assays. Statistical analysis was performed and inhibitory concentrations (IC) were calculated using freely available software [8]. This program was developed to analyse data from malarial drug sensitivity tests such as the HRP-2 assay and produces non-linear regression models to calculate individual inhibitory concentrations (IC). No ethical clearance was required for this in vitro study following regulations of the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna.

Results

Immunosuppressives

All drugs were tested in parallel against the three clones and two strains of P. falciparum resulting in 20 evaluable drug-concentration/growth-inhibition curves. Growth rates were sufficient in all assays for further analysis. Mycophenolic acid led to complete inhibition of in vitro growth of P. falciparum at 19.5 μmol/L and 39 μmol/l, respectively. Complete growth inhibition was achieved at highest concentrations of rapamycin (13.7 μmol/L) and at 13 μmol/L of everolimus for all tested clones and isolates. Individual 50 and 90 percent inhibitory concentrations are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Individual IC 50 and IC 90 values for respective immunosuppressive drugs are shown for each tested parasite sample and for chloroquine resistant strains, respectively

Individual IC50and IC90values1

Median IC50and IC90values

 

3d7

7G8

Dd2

Strain 1

Strain 2

CQr2parasites

 

IC50

IC90

IC50

IC90

IC50

IC90

IC50

IC90

IC50

IC90

IC50

IC90

Mycophenolic acid

5.3

15.1

5.4

15.3

5.7

16.7

5.4

14.4

6.4

23.7

5.6 (5.4-5.9)3

16 (15.1-18.5)

Rapamycin

8.1

12.5

6.7

11.8

6.6

12.3

7.2

12.7

7.8

12.7

6.9 (6.6-7.4)

12.5 (12.2-12.7)

Everolimus

7.5

11.8

5.1

10.7

6.4

11.5

5.8

11.2

6.2

11.6

6 (5.7-6.3)

11.3 (11.1-11.5)

Chloroquine

0.01

0.03

0.19

1.05

0.22

1.09

0.21

0.65

0.27

0.73

0.21 (0.2-0.23)

0.9 (0.7-1.1)

1 in μmol/L, 2 Chloroquine resistant, 3 interquartile range.

Evaluation of cross-sensitivity between chloroquine and immunosuppressive drugs

As shown by the individual IC values in Table 1, 3D7 was the only chloroquine sensitive parasite tested in this trial. Median results for chloroquine resistant parasites are presented in comparison and no consistent pattern of alterations in anti-malarial activity of immunosuppressive drugs in chloroquine resistant versus chloroquine sensitive parasite samples was observed.

Discussion

Mycophenolic acid, rapamycin and everolimus reliably inhibited in vitro growth of P. falciparum in our study. Inhibition was independent of chloroquine susceptibility and was observed in all tested parasites. Therapeutic target concentrations are in the range of around 5.4-32.8 nmol/L for rapamycin and 3–15.7 nmol/L for everolimus when used as immunosuppressive drugs after solid organ transplantations [9]. As the in vitro growth inhibition is at considerably higher concentrations, these drugs are unlikely to exert clinically important anti-malarial activity in vivo. On the contrary, inhibitory concentrations for mycophenolic acid were within clinically relevant plasma levels in patients using standard immunosuppressive regimens for solid organ transplantation. Peak plasma levels after oral intake of 1 g mycophenolic acid are around 78 μmol/L [10]. Importantly, mycophenolic acid has a relatively long half-life of around 17 hours leading to sustained high plasma concentrations in currently recommended twice oral daily regimens. Trough levels under steady state conditions are around 10 μmol/L indicating the potential for prolonged anti-malarial in vitro activity of mycophenolic acid [11]. With all caveats applicable for extrapolation of in vitro data to the in vivo situation, these results clearly demonstrate the potential of clinically important activity of mycophenolic acid against P. falciparum. Although this drug is unlikely to be used as a targeted treatment for malaria, its clinical usefulness as prophylactic agent in transplant recipients may be further investigated. It may be speculated that the use of mycophenolic acid alone – or in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs – may provide sufficient blood schizontocidal activity to preclude the need for additional chemoprophylaxis.

Interestingly, there is a historic link of anti-malarials and immunosuppressive drugs with the 4-aminoquinolines as the most prominent example. Chloroquine – first developed as anti-malarial drug – has known immuno-modulatory effects and is used on a large scale for the treatment of rheumatic diseases including lupus erythematosus [12]. Similarly, cyclosporine A and FK506 possess antiparasitic activity and have been considered as lead agents for new classes of antimicrobial drugs [13]. Mycophenolic acid may, therefore, become yet another example of an immunosuppressive drug with potentially clinically important anti-malarial activity.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Heide-Maria Winkler from the Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna for valuable suggestions, excellent technical assistance and support in the analysis of results.

Funding

No external support was obtained for this study. Costs were supported by departmental research funding by the Medical University of Vienna. We acknowledge support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-Projekt KR 1150/6-1) and the Open Access Publishing fund of the University of Tübingen.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine I, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna
(2)
Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin
(3)
Institut für Tropenmedizin, Universität Tübingen

References

  1. WHO: World Malaria Report 2013. 2013, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  2. Miotto O, Almagro-Garcia J, Manske M, Macinnis B, Campino S, Rockett KA, Amaratunga C, Lim P, Suon S, Sreng S, Anderson JM, Duong S, Nguon C, Chuor CM, Saunders D, Se Y, Lon C, Fukuda MM, Amenga-Etego L, Hodgson AVO, Asoala V, Imwong M, Takala-Harrison S, Nosten F, Su X-Z, Ringwald P, Ariey F, Dolecek C, Hien TT, Boni MF: Multiple populations of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Cambodia. Nat Genet. 2013, 45: 648-655. 10.1038/ng.2624.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ramharter M, Noedl H, Thimasarn K, Wiedermann G, Wernsdorfer G, Wernsdorfer WH: In vitro activity of tafenoquine alone and in combination with artemisinin against Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 67: 39-43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell A, Wernli B, Franklin RM: Roles of peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase and calcineurin in the mechanisms of antimalarial action of cyclosporin A, FK506, and rapamycin. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994, 48: 495-503. 10.1016/0006-2952(94)90279-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ramharter M, Wernsdorfer WH, Kremsner PG: In vitro activity of quinolines against Plasmodium falciparum in Gabon. Acta Trop. 2004, 90: 55-60. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2003.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ramharter M, Noedl H, Winkler H, Graninger W, Wernsdorfer WH, Kremsner PG, Winkler S: In vitro activity and interaction of clindamycin combined with dihydroartemisinin against Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47: 3494-3499. 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3494-3499.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Noedl H, Bronnert J, Yingyuen K, Attlmayr B, Kollaritsch H, Fukuda M: Simple histidine-rich protein 2 double-site sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for use in malaria drug sensitivity testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005, 49: 3575-3577. 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3575-3577.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Malaria Drug Sensitivity Testing. http://malaria.farch.net [http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/user/harald.noedl/malaria/]
  9. Mahalati K, Kahan BD: Clinical pharmacokinetics of sirolimus. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001, 40: 573-585. 10.2165/00003088-200140080-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bullingham RE, Nicholls AJ, Kamm BR: Clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998, 34: 429-455. 10.2165/00003088-199834060-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Staatz CE, Tett SE: Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007, 46: 13-58. 10.2165/00003088-200746010-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zeron P, Khamashta MA: Clinical efficacy and side effects of antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010, 69: 20-28. 10.1136/ard.2008.101766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. High KP: The antimicrobial activities of cyclosporine, FK506, and rapamycin. Transplantation. 1994, 57: 1689-1700. 10.1097/00007890-199457120-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Veletzky et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement