Detection of the East and West African kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis from Uganda using a new assay based on FRET/Melt Curve analysis
Appropriate monitoring of vector resistance to insecticides is an integral component of planning and evaluation of insecticide use in malaria control programmes. The malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis have developed resistance to pyrethroid insecticides as a result of a mechanism conferring reduced nervous system sensitivity, better known as knockdown resistance (kdr). In An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis, two different substitutions in the para-type sodium channel, a L1014F substitution common in West Africa and a L1014S replacement found in Kenya, are linked with kdr. Two different allele-specific polymerase chain reactions (AS-PCR) are needed to detect these known kdr mutations. However, these AS-PCR assays rely on a single nucleotide polymorphism mismatch, which can result in unreliable results.
Methods
Here, a new assay for the detection of knockdown resistance in An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis based on Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer/Melt Curve analysis (FRET/MCA) is presented and compared with the existing assays.
Results
The new FRET/MCA method has the important advantage of detecting both kdr alleles in one assay. Moreover, results show that the FRET/MCA is more reliable and more sensitive than the existing AS-PCR assays and is able to detect new genotypes. By using this technique, the presence of the East African kdr mutation (L1014S) is shown for the first time in An. arabiensis specimens from Uganda. In addition, a new kdr genotype is reported in An. gambiae s.s. from Uganda, where four An. gambiaes.s. mosquitoes possess both, the West (L1014F) and East (L1014S) African kdr allele, simultaneously.
Conclusion
The presence of both kdr mutations in the same geographical region shows the necessity of a reliable assay that enables to detect both mutations in one single assay. Hence, this new assay based on FRET/MCA will improve the screening of the kdr frequencies in An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis.
Background
Malaria vector control strategies rely on the use of insecticides for the impregnation of bed nets and for indoor residual spraying. Increasing resistance of malaria vectors may have important implications for the vector control programmes, especially considering the scaling up of insecticide treated bed nets (ITNs). Hence, knowledge on changing trends in insecticide resistance is a basic requirement to guide the use of insecticides in the malaria control programmes.
Pyrethroids are the most commonly used insecticides in the fight against malaria. These insecticides modify the gating kinetics of the para-type sodium channels by slowing both the activation and the inactivation of the channels [1]. An important resistance mechanism against pyrethroids and DDT, known as knockdown resistance (kdr), has been linked to a single mutation in the para-type sodium channel gene in several insect species [2]. Two different kdr mutations have been found in the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. In West Africa, knockdown resistance is linked with a mutation resulting in a leucine to phenylalanine substitution in the S6 segment of domain II of the para-type sodium channel (L1014F) [3]. In Kenya, however, a different mutation was found, causing a change from leucine to serine at the same amino acid position (L1014S) [4]. Recently, the leucine to phenylalanine mutation was found in An. arabiensis samples from Burkina Faso [5] and the leucine to serine mutation was found in the same species from Kenya [6].
In An. gambiae s.l. populations, the screening for the L1014S and L1014F kdr mutation is commonly performed using two different allele-specific polymerase chain assays (AS-PCR) [3, 4]. However, these techniques rely on a single nucleotide polymorphism mismatch at the 3'-end of a primer, and can lead to unreliable results [7]. Recently, Lynd et al. [7] developed a Hot Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay (HOLA) for the detection of the kdr mutations in An. gambiae s.s. This technique requires four separate hot ligation reactions to genotype specimens for the East and West African kdr mutation [7]. In order to improve the detection of the kdr mutations in An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis a high-throughput test is needed that is able to detect both kdr alleles simultaneously in one assay. Therefore, a new assay based on Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer/Melt Curve analysis (FRET/MCA) was developed and tested on field collected An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis specimens from Uganda.
Methods
Mosquito collections
Mosquitoes were collected at monthly intervals from March 2001 to February 2002 in seven sites throughout Uganda (Okello, unpublished data). Three houses per site were chosen and human landing collections were done during six consecutive nights from 20.00 hr until 06.00 hr. The mosquitoes were morphologically identified using the key developed by Gillies and Coetzee [8] and were stored on silica gel.
DNA extraction and molecular identification of species
The protocol for DNA extraction is adapted from Vythilingam et al. [9]. Since collections were made in the frame of a transmission study (Okello, unpublished data), heads and thoraxes of individual mosquitoes were homogenized in 150 μl blocking buffer [10] and 50 μl of blocking buffer/Nonidet P-40 (blocking buffer containing 0.5 % Nonidet P-40). These enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) homogenates were used for mosquito DNA extraction, by adding 200 μl of a 20% Chelex solution (Biorad, Hercules, USA) to 20 μl of the mosquito homogenate. Samples were placed in a thermo-mixer at 56°C and 1,400 rpm for 30 minutes, vortexed at high speed for six seconds and placed in a thermo-mixer at 95°C and 1,400 rpm for 10 minutes. After incubation, the samples were centrifuged twice at 13,400 g for five minutes at 4°C. The supernatants containing the DNA was transferred and stored at -20°C.
The protocol used for molecular identification of the members of the An. gambiae complex was adapted from Scott et al. [11]. Genomic DNA was mixed with the primers AR (specific for An. arabiensis), AG (specific for An. gambiae s.s.) and UN (common for both species) in a 25 μl reaction. Amplification reactions contained 1 μL of DNA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 200 μM of dNTP's (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom), 80 nM of primers UN and AR, 40 nM of primer GA and 0.25 U of Silverstar DNA polymerase (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium). The PCR was carried out as described in Scott et al. [11]. The amplified products were checked on a 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized on the Image Master VDS (Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden).
AS-PCR for detection of the L1014S and L1014F kdr alleles
The protocol used for the detection of the L1014S or L1014F kdr alleles was adapted from the protocols developed by Martinez-Torres et al. [3] and Ranson et al. [4]. Primers Agd1 (5'-atagattccccgaccatg-3'), Agd2 (5'-agacaaggatgatgaacc-3'), Agd3 (5'-aatttgcattacttacgaca-3') and Agd4 (5'-ctgtagtgataggaaattta-3') were used to detect the L1014F allele (AS-PCR Agd3), whereas primers Agd1, Agd2, Agd4 and Agd5 (5'-tttgcattacttacgactg-3') were used to detect the L1014S allele (AS-PCR Agd5) (Fig 1). Amplification was performed in a 50 μl reaction containing 1 μl of template DNA, 1 × Qiagen PCR buffer, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 100 nM of each primer, 200 μM of dNTP's, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Taq PCR core kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The cycling conditions were: initial 94°C denaturation for five minutes, 10 cycles of one minute denaturation at 94°C, 30 seconds annealing at 54°C and 30 seconds extension at 72°C, followed by 30 cycles of one minute denaturation at 94°C, 30 seconds annealing at 47°C and 30 seconds extension at 72°C, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. Amplification products were checked on a 2% agarose gel and visualized after ethidium bromide staining.
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the AS-PCR Agd5 and AS-PCR Agd3. Schematic representation of the AS-PCR Agd5, which detects the L1014S kdr allele (A) and the AS-PCR Agd3, which detects the L1014F kdr allele (B) [3-4].
FRET/Melt Curve analysis
Primers and probes were designed using the Meltcalc software [12]. The forward primer AgdF-ROX (5'- tggccactgttgtgaTagg-3') is labelled with ROX, 4 nucleotides from the 3'-end (Capital T), while the probe KDR-FAM (5'-tacttacgactaaatttcctat-3') is labelled with FAM, at its 3'-end. The probe complements the wild type antisense strand of the PCR product. Two non-specific g's were added to the 5'-end of the reversed primer AgdR (5'-ggtgacaaaagcaaggctaag-3') to increase the melting temperature and the GC-content of the primer.
A primary PCR was performed with a 50 μl reaction mix containing 1 μl of DNA, 1 × Qiagen PCR buffer, 1 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of each dNTP, 100 nM of the primers Agd1 and Agd2 and 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Taq PCR core kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Amplification conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for three minutes, forty cycles of one minute denaturation at 94°C, 30 seconds annealing at 47°C and 30 seconds extension at 72°C followed by a final extension of 10 minutes at 72°C (Figure 2A).
Figure 2
Schematic representation of the FRET/MCA, which allows the detection of both (L1014S and L1014F)kdralleles in one assay. A. The primary PCR (primers Agd1-Agd2) results in amplification of a 293 bp fragment of the para-type sodium channel gene. B. During the secondary PCR, a 121 bp fragment is amplified and is labelled with ROX as the forward primer is extended. C. After amplification, the FAM-labelled probe hybridizes, and FRET starts to occur. The donor FAM-fluorophore is excited by incident light and because the ROX-acceptor is in close proximity, the excited state energy from FAM can be transferred. D. Melt curve analysis on the probe-amplicon hybrid. Progressive increase of temperature during melt curve analysis leads, at a specific temperature, to the dissociation of the probe from the amplicon. At this point, no FRET occurs and the ROX-fluorescence will decrease. During this MCA, the change in amount of fluorescence for each probe-template hybrid was plotted against the temperature and its negative derivative appeared as a positive peak.
The secondary PCR assay and the MCA were performed on an iCycler with a 490/20X FAM excitation filter and a 620/30M ROX emission filter (Bio-rad, Hercules, USA). The secondary PCR was performed in a 96-well plate. Amplification reactions (50 μl) contained 1 × iQ supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA), 1 mM MgCl2, 500 nM of AgdF-ROX, 100 nM of AgdR and 2 μl of a 10-fold dilution of the primary PCR product resulting from amplification with Agd1 and Agd2 (Figure 2B). Cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for four minutes, forty cycles of one minute denaturation at 95°C, 30 seconds annealing at 52°C and 30 seconds extension at 72°C followed by a final extension at 72°C for eight minutes. During this asymmetric PCR, the target strand to which the FAM-labelled probe binds, was produced in excess. After amplification, the probe was added in a final concentration of 200 nM, and a melt curve was performed, consisting of 95°C for one minute, cooling to 40°C for one minute and 80 repeats heating for 20 seconds, starting at 40°C and with 0.5°C increments. During this melt curve, the cooling to 40°C will allow the FAM-labelled probe to anneal adjacent to the ROX-fluorophore of the PCR product (Figure 2C). The temperature is subsequently slowly increased, while the ROX-fluorescence resulting from FRET, is continually monitored. When the melting temperature of the probe-amplicon hybrid is reached, FRET can no longer occur, and the ROX-fluorescence will decrease (Figure 2D). Changes in the ROX-fluorescence appear as a peak on the plot of the first negative derivative of the fluorescence versus temperature function. All data were analysed with the iCycler™ iQ Optical system software version 3.0a (Bio-rad, Hercules, USA). The experiments were performed in triplicate to verify reproducibility.
Three plasmids, containing as inserts the wild type, the L1014S or the L1014F kdr allele, were used on each plate as positive controls. Two lines, a susceptible line and a homozygote resistant line for the West African kdr allele L1014F, were obtained from laboratory colonies of the LIN/IRD and were used to construct the L1014L (wild type) and the L1014F plasmid, respectively. The L1014S plasmid originated from a sequenced homozygous L1014S field specimen of Uganda. The plasmids were constructed by ligation and transformation of the 293 bp PCR product resulting from amplification with primers Agd1 and Agd2, by using the Original TA cloning kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). Three millilitres of each clone was purified on a column (QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and DNA was resuspended in 50 μl water. Two microlitres of a 100-fold dilution of the plasmid was used directly in the secondary, asymmetric PCR of the FRET/MCA assay instead of the template DNA. Plasmid and direct PCR sequencing were performed by the VIB genetic service facility (University of Antwerp, Belgium).
Results
Melt curve analysis of the plasmids produced three different melting curves with melting temperatures (Tm) of approximately 49.5°C, 52°C and 57.5°C for the L1014S kdr allele, the L1014F kdr allele and the wild type allele, respectively (Figure 3A). As expected, the wild type sequence DNA showed the highest melting temperature. The existence of a nucleotide mismatch between the target DNA and the hybridization probe produced a lower Tm than the Tm of the wild type sequence.
Figure 3
FRET/MCA of the DIIS6 region of thepara-type sodium channel gene ofAn. gambiae s.s. andAn. arabiensisplotted as the first negative derivative of the relative fluorescence unit (-d(RFU)/dT) versus temperature function. In all 3 panels, the thicker blue horizontal line denotes the threshold for background fluorescence, and the curve entirely below denotes the results for the non-template control (gray). A. Cloned sequence variants, from low to high Tm: The L1014S allele (red), the L1014F allele (blue) and the wild type L1014L allele (green). Melting peaks were identified at 49.5°C, 52°C and 57.5°C, respectively. B. An. gambiae s.s. specimens, from low to high Tm: homozygous for the L1014S allele, Tm of 49.5°C (red) ; specimens heterozygous for both kdr alleles (L1014S/L1014F allele), Tm of 51°C (dark red) ; specimens homozygous for L1014F allele, Tm of 52°C (blue) and specimens homozygous wild type, Tm of 57.5°C (green). C. An. gambiae s.s. specimens heterozygous for the L1014S/wild type (dark red) were characterised by two melting peaks of 49.5°C and 57.5°C. Heterozygous (L1014S/wild type) An. arabiensis specimens showed the same pattern.
The melt curve obtained for mosquitoes homozygous for the L1014F, the L1014S or the wild type allele was identical to the melt curve obtained for the corresponding plasmid (Figure 3B).
Mosquito specimens, which were heterozygous for the L1014S/wild type, were characterised by two peaks with Tm of approximately 49.5°C and 57.5°C (Figure 3C). For the first time, two An. arabiensis specimens heterozygous for the L1014S/wild type mutation were found in Uganda [GenBank:DQ263749]. Four An. gambiae s.s. specimens produced a melting peak with a Tm of approximately 51°C, which was different from the expected Tm for the wild type or the mutant alleles (Figure 3B). Cloning and sequencing of the 293 bp fragment of domain II of the para-type sodium channel gene revealed that these specimens possess both, the L1014S and L1014F kdr allele, simultaneously [GenBank:DQ263748]. In theory, two peaks would be expected for these samples, one at 49.5°C and one at 52°C. Instead, these samples showed a broad peak at 51°C, due to a too small difference in melting temperature between the L1014S and L1014F kdr allele (Figure 3B).
The FRET/MCA results were compared with the two AS-PCR assays for the detection of the West (L1014F) and East (L1014S) African kdr mutation, i.e. AS-PCR Agd3 and AS-PCR Agd5. Therefore, 290 wild-caught An. gambiae s.s. and 183 An. arabiensis specimens from Uganda were tested by use of the three detection methods. By comparing the FRET/MCA and the AS-PCR Agd5 results, 121 An. gambiae s.s. and 181 An. arabiensis mosquitoes showed the same homozygote genotype for L1014L. Both assays showed the same heterozygous genotype L1014S/wild type for 113 An. gambiae s.s. and two An. arabiensis specimens and the same homozygous genotype for L1014S for 38 An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes (Table 1). The four An. gambiae s.s. specimens, heterozygous for both kdr alleles (L1014S/L1014F) were scored as homozygous L1014S in the AS-PCR Agd5. This is expected since the AS-PCR Agd5 should not detect the L1014F. Although the AS-PCR assays were adapted to give well interpretable results (Figure 4), there was discrepancy between the FRET/MCA and the AS-PCR Agd5 results for 10 An. gambiae s.s. specimens (Table 1). Sequence-analysis revealed that in all these cases the FRET/MCA method gave the correct result.
Figure 4
PCR products obtained using the AS-PCR Agd5 adapted from Ransonet al. [4] onAn. gambiae s.s. after separation on a 2% agarose gel. Lane 1, Lane 3, Lane 9: homozygous wild type mosquitoes (L1014L/L1014L); Lane 2 and Lane 8: heterozygous specimens (L1014L/L1014S); Lane 4: homozygous resistant specimen (L1014S/L1014S); Lane 5 and Lane 7: 100 bp ladder; Lane 6: specimen scored as heterozygous (L1014L/L1014S) by AS-PCR, but scored as homozygous resistant (L1014S/L1014S) by FRET/MCA.
Table 1
Comparison between the FRET/MCA and the AS-PCR Agd5. The AS-PCR Agd5 only detects the East African kdr mutation (L1014S).
Species
AS-PCR Agd5
FRET/MCA
S/S
S/RE
RE/RE
RE/RW
An. gambiae s.s.
S/S
121
S/RE
3
113
1
RE/RE
6
38
4
negative
2
2
An. arabiensis
S/S
181
S/RE
2
S: Wild type allele (L1014L)
RE: Resistant allele, East African mutation (L1014S)
RW: Resistant allele, West African mutation (L1014F)
By comparing the FRET/MCA and the AS-PCR Agd3 results, 124 An. gambiae s.s. and 181 An. arabiensis mosquitoes showed the same homozygote genotype for L1014L (Table 2). In total, 119 An. gambiae s.s. and two An. arabiensis mosquitoes were scored homozygous wild type by AS-PCR Agd3, whereas they were scored as heterozygous L1014S/wild type by FRET/MCA. This is expected since the AS-PCR Agd3, designed for the detection of L1014F, should not detect the L1014S. However, 39 An. gambiae s.s. samples scored by FRET/MCA as homozygous for the East African kdr mutation (L1014S/L1014S), were scored as homozygous susceptible by AS-PCR Agd3 (Table 2). The FRET/MCA results of these 39 An. gambiae s.s samples were confirmed by sequence analysis. Hence, when the AS-PCR Agd3 is performed on samples possessing the L1014S allele, primer Agd4 can mis-anneal to the L1014S allele and lead in combination with primer Agd2 to an erroneous amplification of a 137 bp PCR product, which is mis-recognized as a wild type allele. This non-specific annealing is not unlikely to occur in absence of a specific primer for L1014S, there is only one nucleotide mismatch between the second nucleotide from the 3'-end of primer Agd4 and the sequence of the L1014S allele (T-C mismatch) (Figure 1).
Table 2
Comparison between the FRET/MCA and the AS-PCR Agd3. The AS-PCR Agd3 only detects the West African kdr mutation (L1014F).
Species
AS-PCR Agd3
FRET/MCA
S/S
S/RE
RE/RE
RE/RW
An. gambiae s.s.
S/S
124
119
39
S/RW
2
RW/RW
2
negative
2
2
An. arabiensis
S/S
181
2
S: Wild type allele (L1014L)
RE: Resistant allele, East African mutation (L1014S)
RW: Resistant allele, West African mutation (L1014F)
Interestingly, the FRET/MCA was able to score 4 samples which were negative in both AS-PCR assays: two were homozygous susceptible and 2 heterozygous resistant for the L1014S allele. This indicates that the reliability of the AS-PCR can depend on the template concentration, while the FRET/MCA is less sensitive to changes in DNA template concentration.
Discussion
The ability to determine the resistance status of An. gambiae s.l. is essential to guide the use of insecticides in the African malaria control programmes. It allows for a rational choice of insecticide to be made, based on the type and extent of resistance present. Knockdown resistance has been detected in An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis [3–6]. The screening for the L1014S and L1014F kdr mutation, causing the knockdown resistance, is commonly performed using two different AS-PCR assays [3, 4]. These assays provide a cheap mean for determining the kdr allele frequencies in An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis populations. Recently, Lynd et al. [7] developed a new assay based on HOLA for the detection of the kdr alleles.
Here, a new high-throughput assay based on fluorescent hybridization and melt curve analysis for the detection of both kdr mutations, is described. Although this FRET/MCA technique requires a high initial equipment outlay, consisting of a standard PCR cycler equipped with an optical module, and requires expensive reagents, this technique offers several advantages over the existing methods.
First, the AS-PCRs rely only on a single nucleotide polymorphism at the 3'-end of the primer and can lead to unreliable results [7]. Although, the existing AS-PCR assays were adapted to obtain better interpretable results, there was still a discrepancy between the AS-PCR and the FRET/MCA results for 10 An. gambiae s.s. specimens (Table 1). In all these cases, the FRET/MCA method gave the correct result. Moreover, the FRET/MCA assay showed to be more sensitive and less depending on the template concentration than the existing AS-PCR assays.
Secondly, as new mutations arise at the probe-amplicon hybrid, these mutations are likely to be detected by the FRET/MCA assay. In contrast, the AS-PCR and the HOLA technique can only detect resistance alleles of known sequence. If other mutations arise, they need to be characterised at gene sequence level so that a new AS-PCR or HOLA assay can be developed, alongside the existing ones.
Finally, the major advantage of the FRET/MCA technique is its ability to screen simultaneously for both kdr alleles in one well by the use of only one probe. In contrast, two AS-PCR assays (AS-PCR Agd3, AS-PCR Agd5) or 4 separate HOLA reactions are required to genotype specimens for both kdr mutations. In addition, the FRET/MCA is designed to run in a 96-well format with integrated software to analyse the fluorescence data. In the initial development stage, samples were run in triplicate to verify reproducibility. Given the high reproducibility and ease of interpretation, up to 90 specimens can be screened for both kdr alleles on a single microtitre plate, allowing fast screening of the kdr mutations in a geographical region.
The FRET/MCA technique was applied on mosquitoes from Uganda to show its applicability in detecting kdr alleles in field collected specimens. The assay worked well on DNA extracts from ELISA homogenates of mosquitoes as well as on simplified extracts of one mosquito leg (data not shown). The FRET/MCA could clearly distinguish between the different kdr genotypes in An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis specimens. The East African kdr mutation (L1014S) was found in heterozygous state in An. arabiensis specimens from Uganda. Likewise, Stump et al. [6] had found the same mutation in An. arabiensis from Kisumu, a site close to one of the study sites in Uganda. Kdr seems to be present in low frequency in An. arabiensis. However, increased insecticide pressure can increase the kdr frequency as was demonstrated in Kenya, where ITN introduction doubled the frequency of the L1014S kdr allele in An. gambiae s.s. [6]. This points to the fact that high-throughput methods are needed for the monitoring of the kdr allele.
Moreover, a new kdr genotype has been found in An. gambiae s.s. from Uganda. In two collection sites in Uganda, An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes were found to possess both the West (L1014F) and East (L1014S) African kdr alleles, simultaneously. Interestingly, this West African kdr allele (L1014F) was only found in combination with the East African kdr allele (L1014S) in An. gambiae s.s. In all steps, from DNA extraction to FRET/MCA assay, appropriate negative controls were included. Moreover, the four heterozygotes originated from different localities and were extracted and tested on different days. Hence, contamination can be ruled out. The biological reason for the simultaneous occurrence of both mutations is subject of ongoing research. It is already clear that the presence of this West African kdr mutation (L1014F) in Uganda has important implications for the monitoring of kdr resistance in Africa. The reported absence of the L1014F in East African countries and of the L1014S in West African countries is probably due to the fact that in most cases only one or the other AS-PCR was used to detect kdr. In this way, the East African L1014S allele may perhaps been overlooked in West Africa. However, the present FRET/MCA survey clearly demonstrates that the West African L1014F allele also occurs in East Africa.
Conclusion
The FRET/MCA assay allows the genotyping of An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis specimens for both kdr alleles by the use of only one probe. The assay results in clearly interpretable melting peaks for the different kdr genotypes and works well on DNA extracts from ELISA homogenates as well as on simplified extracts of one mosquito leg. Moreover, the results show that the FRET/MCA is more reliable and more sensitive than the existing AS-PCR assays and is able to detect new genotypes. A new genotype was found in Uganda where four An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes possessed both, the West (L1014F) and East (L1014S) African kdr allele, simultaneously. The presence of both kdr alleles in a same geographical region shows the necessity of a reliable assay that enables the detection of both kdr alleles in one assay. Hence, this new high-throughput FRET/MCA assay will improve the screening of the kdr frequencies in An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the School of Medical Entomology in Kampala, Uganda, for the excellent entomological work and the Ministry of Health of Uganda for facilitating this research. We are grateful to the Laboratoire de Lutte contre les Insectes Nuisibles (LIN/IRD) of Montpellier for providing susceptible L1014L and homozygous resistant L1014F An. gambiae s.s. specimens. We thank Saskia Decuypere for excellent assistance in the design of this FRET/MCA assay.
This research received financial support from the Belgian Directorate-General for Development Cooperation and from a PAL + 2002 grant from the French Ministry of Research. This research was funded by a Ph.D. grant of the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen).
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Departement of Parasitology, Prins Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine
(2)
Departement of Invertebrates, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
(3)
Evolutionary Biology Group, University of Antwerp
References
Lund AE, Narahashi T: Kinetics of sodium channel modification as the basis for the variation in the nerve membrane effects of pyrethroids and DDT analogs. Pestic Biochem Physiol . 1983, 20: 203-216. 10.1016/0048-3575(83)90025-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Soderlund DM, Knipple DC: The molecular biology of knockdown resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003, 33: 563-577. 10.1016/S0965-1748(03)00023-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Berge JB, Devonshire AL, Guillet P, Pasteur N, Pauron D: Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998, 7: 179-184. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1998.72062.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule JM, Wang X, Hemingway J, Collins FH: Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2000, 9: 491-497. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00209.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Diabaté A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Dabire KR, Simard F, Ouedraogo JB, Guillet P, Hougard JM: First report of a kdr mutation in Anopheles arabiensis from Burkina Faso, West Africa. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2004, 20: 195-196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Stump AD, Atieli FK, Vulule JM, Besansky NJ: Dynamics of the pyrethroid knockdown resistance allele in Western Kenyan populations of Anopheles gambiae in response to insecticide-treated bed net trials. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 70: 591-596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lynd A, Ranson H, McCall PJ, Randle NP, BlackIV WC, Walker ED, Donnelly MJ: A simplified high-throughput method for pyrethroid knock-down resistance (kdr) detection in Anopheles gambiae. Malar J. 2005, 4: 16-10.1186/1475-2875-4-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gillies MT, Coetzee M: A supplement to the anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Afrotropical region). Publications of the South African Institute for Medical Research. 1987, 55-Google Scholar
Vythilingam I, Nitiaavathy K, Yi P, Bakotee B, Hugo B, Singh B, Palmer K: A highly sensitive, nested polymerase chain reaction based method using simple DNA extraction to detect malaria sporozoites in mosquitoes. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999, 30: 631-635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wirtz RA, Sattabongkot J, Hall T, Burkot TR, Rosenberg R: Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Plasmodium vivax -VK247 sporozoites. J Med Entomol. 1992, 29: 854-857.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH: Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 49: 520-529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schütz E, von Ashen N: Spreadsheet software for thermodynamic melting point prediction of oligonucleotide hybridization with and without mismatches. Biotechniques. 1999, 27: 1218-1224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.