Skip to main content

Safety of artemether-lumefantrine in pregnant women with malaria: results of a prospective cohort study in Zambia



Safety data regarding exposure to artemisinin-based combination therapy in pregnancy are limited. This prospective cohort study conducted in Zambia evaluated the safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) in pregnant women with malaria.


Pregnant women attending antenatal clinics were assigned to groups based on the drug used to treat their most recent malaria episode (AL vs. sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, SP). Safety was assessed using standard and pregnancy-specific parameters. Post-delivery follow-up was six weeks for mothers and 12 months for live births. Primary outcome was perinatal mortality (stillbirth or neonatal death within seven days after birth).


Data from 1,001 pregnant women (AL n = 495; SP n = 506) and 933 newborns (AL n = 466; SP n = 467) showed: perinatal mortality (AL 4.2%; SP 5.0%), comprised of early neonatal mortality (each group 2.3%), stillbirths (AL 1.9%; SP 2.7%); preterm deliveries (AL 14.1%; SP 17.4% of foetuses); and gestational age-adjusted low birth weight (AL 9.0%; SP 7.7%). Infant birth defect incidence was 1.8% AL and 1.6% SP, excluding umbilical hernia. Abortions prior to antenatal care could not be determined: abortion occurred in 4.5% of women treated with AL during their first trimester; none were reported in the 133 women exposed to SP and/or quinine during their first trimester. Overall development (including neurological assessment) was similar in both groups.


These data suggest that exposure to AL in pregnancy, including first trimester, is not associated with particular safety risks in terms of perinatal mortality, malformations, or developmental impairment. However, more data are required on AL use during the first trimester.


More than 30 million women become pregnant each year in malaria-endemic areas of sub-Saharan Africa [1]. Malaria during pregnancy causes adverse outcomes, including abortion, anaemia, and low infant birth weight, with the latter complication due to foetal growth restriction and preterm delivery [2, 3]. An important preventative strategy in highly endemic areas is intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) [4], and as SP becomes less effective with increasing Plasmodium falciparum resistance [5], effective treatment during pregnancy becomes more important.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) as first-line treatment of P. falciparum malaria [6]. These guidelines state that artemisinin derivatives should be used to treat uncomplicated falciparum malaria in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy [6, 7], but that they should not be used in the first trimester unless they are the only treatment available [6, 7], or if the patient's life is threatened, or if treatment with quinine plus clindamycin has failed [6]. The guidelines take into account the greater confidence regarding the safety of ACT exposure in the second and third trimesters [611], and the scarcity of data on first trimester exposure versus the risk of embryotoxicity or death [7, 12, 13].

Artemether-lumefantrine (AL; Coartem®, Novartis Pharma AG) is currently the most widely used ACT for acute, uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. Zambia was one of the first countries in Africa to replace SP with AL as first-line therapy for malaria treatment, which occurred in 2004 [14]. Here, the results of a Zambian multi-centre, prospective cohort study to evaluate the safety of AL used to treat symptomatic malaria in pregnancy are described.


Study population

The study was carried out in Zambia at four antenatal clinics in the districts of Choma, Ndola and Lusaka. Data were collected between October 2004 and July 2008. Pregnant women were eligible for inclusion if they had received AL or SP for the treatment of malaria. Diagnosis was clinically or parasitologically confirmed. SP was the standard anti-malarial treatment during pregnancy and also used for IPT. Pregnant women were assigned to exposure groups according to the treatment received for the "index episode", defined as the most recently treated malaria episode prior to study entry.

Study objectives and procedures

The primary endpoint was the incidence of perinatal mortality (stillbirth or neonatal death within 7 days of birth). Secondary outcome measures were gestational age at delivery and birth weight adjusted for gestational age. In the absence of data on birth weight adjusted for gestational age from Zambia, the Zimbabwean birth weight data adjusted for gestational age as published by Munjanja & Masona in 1990 [15] was used. A newborn was considered to have low birth weight if the observed birth weight was lower than the corresponding 5th percentile of the Zimbabwean birth weight, according to gestational age in keeping with international standards. In addition, the following exploratory endpoints were assessed: frequency of spontaneous abortion, preterm delivery, neonatal mortality, maternal mortality, major and minor birth defects, and infant development.

Women attending the antenatal clinic were enrolled if they reported receiving treatment with either AL (20 mg artemether and 120 mg lumefantrine) or SP (1500 mg sulphadoxine plus 75 mg pyrimethamine) according to label recommendations. Exposure was verified by documentation from their outpatient (clinic) files, which also detailed diagnostic procedures performed, and dosage of any concomitant medication given. As per government policy, women received SP, at the same doses as described above, during the second or third trimester as IPT. Treatment with any drug, including anti-malarials, prior to or after the index episode was recorded.

Women visited the antenatal clinic for assessment of safety parameters at baseline/enrolment, four weeks post-enrolment, four weeks pre-delivery, at delivery, and at six weeks post-delivery. Infants were followed up at six weeks, 14 weeks, and at 12 months after birth.

Safety assessments included monitoring and recording all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) up to six weeks after delivery. Pregnancy-specific assessments included rates of perinatal mortality defined as stillbirth (>28 weeks gestation) and early neonatal death (within seven days of birth), neonatal mortality (≤28 days of birth), maternal mortality (up to six weeks post-delivery), spontaneous abortion (≤28 weeks gestation), stillbirth, preterm delivery (≤37 completed weeks), incidence of low birth weight, gestational age at delivery (estimated from the last menstrual period [LMP], or by a developmental score [Dubowitz assessment] [16], if the LMP was unknown), and incidence of major and minor birth defects. Concomitant infections were recorded. Minor/major birth malformations were documented using a checklist. Neurodevelopmental assessment was performed at 14 weeks and 12 months after birth. The development of infants was assessed by the investigators either through a general assessment (e.g. smiling, lifting head, sitting unsupported, standing without assistance, crawling) or the Shoklo neurodevelopment assessment [17], or both.

This study was designed, implemented, and reported in accordance with ICH Good Clinical Practice, applicable local regulations, and the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Review Committee of the Tropical Diseases Research Centre, Zambia, and WHO Ethics Review Committee, Geneva. All participants, or their parent/guardian (if the subject was a minor), gave written or finger-marked informed consent before study entry.

An independent Study Advisory Committee (SAC) reviewed unblinded data for 677 women and 392 infants on four occasions during the study and all data at the end of the study.

Statistical analysis

Perinatal mortality was summarized by exposure (AL or SP) for the index malaria episode, together with traditional asymptotic as well as Pearson-Clopper one-sample two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). No formal testing for statistical significance between the two exposure groups was performed; instead, 95% CIs for the difference in proportions between the groups were constructed using traditional asymptotic methods and the Wilson score method without continuity correction. The odds ratio (with two-sided 95% CI) was calculated for perinatal mortality. Women who discontinued the study prior to delivery, or who had a spontaneous abortion were not taken into account in the primary analysis. However, the robustness of the results was assessed by supportive analyses applying multiple missing data imputation techniques [18].

The propensity score technique assessing pre-defined baseline factors (five pregnancy-related and 10 disease-related factors) was used to mitigate the potential channelling effect due to non-random assignment of therapy [19]. With the targeted sample size of 500 patients in each group, a two-sided 95% CI for precision on observed perinatal mortality (primary endpoint) would vary between 3% and 7% for an assumed background incidence of 5% in the Zambian population [20]. This precision of estimation was deemed satisfactory for a pilot study of this type. All data analyses were carried out according to a pre-established analysis plan.


Demographics and clinical characteristics

A total of 1,001 pregnant women were enrolled, of whom 84.4% (845/1001) completed the study to six weeks after delivery (Figure 1). Demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Among the women enrolled, 98.9% had received at least some degree of schooling at the primary level and 52.2% had received some degree of secondary education.

Figure 1
figure 1

Participant flowchart. AL exposure group 9 pairs of twins; SP exposure group 7 pairs of twins.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of exposure groups at enrolment and anti-malarial treatment during current pregnancy

The index episode was predominantly diagnosed based on symptoms: malaria was unconfirmed in 82.0% of the AL and 87.2% of the SP exposure groups. Details of anti-malarial treatment received during the current pregnancy are shown in Table 1. The majority of women with known delivery status in the AL group (412/473; 87.1%) had received both AL and SP (as IPT) during the current pregnancy. Conversely, most women in the SP group had received only SP for treatment (449/478; 93.9%) and IPT prophylaxis in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters, in accordance with National Health policy in Zambia; a single dose of 1500 mg of sulphadoxine plus 75 mg pyrimethamine was used for treatment or prophylaxis. In total, 2.7% (13/478) of women in the SP group were exposed to both AL and SP. Most women received two to four courses of anti-malarial treatment during the pregnancy, including IPT. A small proportion of women in each group (AL 2.1%; SP 3.3%) were also exposed to quinine. Approximately 70% of enrolled women had taken their first anti-malarial treatment 12 weeks after their LMP. In total, 156 women (150/495 [30.3%] from the AL group, plus 6 from the SP group) received AL treatment during the first trimester, while 138 women (123/506 [24.3%] from the SP group, plus 15 from the AL group) received SP treatment during the first trimester.

All patients reported taking the full prescribed course of anti-malarial treatment, and very few (<0.4%) reported vomiting the medication. More than 95% of all enrolled women received at least one concomitant medication (other than anti-malarial therapy), most commonly folic acid and oral iron preparations. All women were counselled for HIV testing. Approximately 30% of women in the AL group and 38% in the SP exposure group were tested for HIV: overall, 22% of women with a test result were reported as HIV-positive.

Pregnancy outcomes

A summary of pregnancy outcomes is shown in Table 2. Overall perinatal mortality was similar for both exposure groups (Table 3) (AL 4.2% [asymptotic 95% CI 2.4 - 6.0]; SP 5.0% [asymptotic 95% CI 3.1 - 6.9]; odds ratio [AL versus SP] 0.84 [asymptotic 95% CI 0.45 - 1.53]). First trimester perinatal mortality is reported in detail below. Subgroup analyses on perinatal mortality did not show any significant between-group differences.

Table 2 Pregnancy outcome by exposure group
Table 3 Perinatal mortality (stillbirths plus neonatal deaths) by exposure group

Perinatal mortality status was missing for 6.2% of women due to abortion (1.2%) or withdrawal prior to delivery (5.0%). However, multiple imputation analyses demonstrated that the results were robust with respect to missing data.

Women treated with AL for the index episode had a higher frequency of confirmed malaria in comparison with women treated with SP. An analysis to correct for any possible channelling bias showed no effect on perinatal mortality due to more AL patients having confirmed malaria (adjusted odds ratio of 0.79 [95% Wald CI 0.43 - 1.46] versus the observed unadjusted odds ratio of 0.84 [asymptotic 95% CI 0.45 - 1.53]).

Stillbirths occurred in 1.9% of the AL group and in 2.7% of the SP group. Of the nine mothers who had stillbirths in the AL group, AL was the last exposure in three cases; eight women had been exposed to SP for IPT, six were exposed after the AL-treated index episode, and two before it. Thirteen women in the SP group had stillbirths: in five cases, SP was the last exposure (as treatment for the index episode); six of the thirteen women had IPT; and two women were treated with quinine for additional episodes of malaria.

Early neonatal death was similar for each exposure group (2.3% for each group). In the AL group, four of the 11 neonatal deaths occurred after delivery at home. All 11 neonatal deaths in the SP group occurred after delivery at a hospital or health centre.

There were seven cases of abortion in the AL group, all occurring in women who were exposed to AL during their first trimester (further details below); the last anti-malarial exposure was AL (index episode) in six cases, and in the remaining case SP was given for treatment of a malaria episode occurring after the index episode. Eight abortions occurred in five women in the SP group, all second or third trimester exposures (one was carrying triplets, another was carrying twins): the last anti-malarial exposure was SP (index episode) in one case, SP (IPT) in three cases, and quinine (additional malaria episode) in the remaining case.

Infant outcomes at birth

Infant outcomes are summarized in Table 4. Low birth weight according to gestational age occurred in 9.0% of the AL and 7.7% of the SP group. Mean and median birth weights, head circumference, body length, and sex distribution were similar in both exposure groups. Mean and median gestational ages determined using LMP were comparable for the two groups (39.0 weeks each), as were the values calculated from the Dubowitz test (mean/median: AL group 37.6/37.7 weeks; SP group 38.2/38.1 weeks).

Table 4 Gestational age and weight of infants at birth by exposure group

Birth defects in infants were detected by midwives in 6.5% of the AL group and 4.1% of the SP group (Table 5). The between-group difference was largely due to a higher rate of umbilical hernia in the AL group (AL 4.7%; SP 2.7%). The majority of these had resolved by the 12 month evaluation (Table 6). Excluding umbilical hernia, which is a common reversible defect in African children [21, 22], the infant birth defect frequency was 1.8% for AL and 1.6% for SP. There was no pattern of distribution of any birth defect in either exposure group. In the AL group, multiple birth defects were reported in two infants: one had trisomy 21, the other had trisomy 18. Polydactyly was reported in seven infants and occurred in a similar proportion in each group (AL 0.7%; SP 0.9%).

Table 5 Birth defects reported from the time of delivery to 14 weeks by exposure group
Table 6 Birth defects reported from time of delivery until 14 weeks after birth, according to anti-malarial drug exposure during the first trimester

Infant outcomes and developmental assessments from birth to 12 months

Mean and median height and weight were very similar in both groups at birth, 14 weeks, and at 12 months after delivery (data not shown). The general developmental assessment in 833 infants (427 AL; 406 SP) at 14 weeks (smiling, lifting head) and at 12 months (sitting unsupported, standing without assistance, crawling) was also similar for each group, and virtually all infants met their expected developmental milestones. In addition, infants of mothers only exposed to AL or SP compared well with the overall group.

Data from the Shoklo neurodevelopmental evaluation, performed in 530 infants (298 AL; 232 SP), revealed very similar mean and median values for each exposure group. Tone and behaviour scores were similar at 14 weeks and 12 months, but motor milestone and coordination scores increased considerably over the study period. No differences in Shoklo neurodevelopment scores were observed in infants of mothers who had been exposed only to AL or to SP: more than 98% of infants assessed achieved a score of "good" or "excellent" at 14 weeks and at 12 months.

Neonatal mortality rate (death within 28 days of birth) was 3.0% in each group. In many cases the cause of death was unknown and the most common reported causes were prematurity and asphyxia.

Exposure to anti-malarials in the first trimester (exploratory analyses)

A total of 156 women (150/495 [30.3%] from the AL plus 6 from the SP group) received AL treatment during the first trimester, primarily for treatment of the index episode (Table 1). Foetuses of women exposed to AL only during the first trimester had a similar rate of full-term delivery to those who had no first trimester anti-malarial exposure (AL alone: 75.3% [113/150]; none: 76.5% [523/684]). The rate of preterm delivery was highest in foetuses of women exposed to SP and/or quinine during the first trimester (SP and/or quinine: 20.7% [28/135]; AL alone 13.3% [20/150]; none 15.2% [104/684]) (Table 7).

Table 7 Pregnancy outcome by exposure group, according to anti-malarial drug exposure during the first trimester

A total of 159 foetuses were exposed to AL during the first trimester, either AL only (n = 150) or AL plus SP (n = 9) (Table 7). Six abortions occurred in this population (AL alone: 4 cases; AL plus SP: 2 cases) giving a rate of 3.8% (Table 8). One further abortion occurred in a woman who was likely to have taken AL during the first trimester (incomplete LMP date). Confounding factors were present in four cases; one had syphilis, two had multiple malarial episodes, and one received concomitant treatment with salbutamol and AL for a threatened abortion. In 135 foetuses exposed to SP and/or quinine during the first trimester, no abortions were reported.

Table 8 Abortion occurring in women treated with artemether-lumefantrine

Perinatal mortality was very similar whether first trimester exposure was to AL alone, or to SP and/or quinine, or if no anti-malarial therapy had been received (Table 3). Among women who received AL during the first trimester, 4.3% (6/140) newborns died within 28 days after birth compared with 3.0% (19/627) among women who received no anti-malarials and 1.6% (2/126) among women who only received SP and/or quinine during the first trimester.

Birth weight (adjusted for gestational age or not) showed no notable differences between the groups.

The incidence of malformations in babies born to mothers who received AL only in the first trimester was 6.9% (9/130); eight of these nine cases were umbilical hernias, and the remaining baby was reported as having small genital labia, lanugo, and a small nose (Table 6). The malformation rate in infants from women exposed to other anti-malarial agents was 6.6% (8/121), and 4.5% (27/596) in those with no anti-malarial exposure in the first trimester.

The Shoklo neurodevelopmental assessment of infants born to women exposed to AL in the first trimester were very similar to results for SP: 98.8% (83/84) of infants from the AL group achieved a score of "good" or "excellent" at 14 weeks, and 100% (78/78) achieved the same scores at 12 months.

General safety outcomes

A summary of common AEs is presented in Table 9. The two groups were generally similar in their observed AE profiles, the most notable differences being the rates of premature delivery and of malaria as an AE, both of which were higher in the SP group. SAEs, most commonly complications of pregnancy and infections, occurred in 6.5% of women in the AL group and in 7.3% of those exposed to SP.

Table 9 Common* adverse events by exposure group

There were six maternal deaths during the study; one death (0.2%) in the AL group (anaemia secondary to spontaneous abortion), and five deaths (1.0%) in the SP group (one from Kaposi's sarcoma, three from infections [pneumonia, sepsis, and viral encephalitis], and one from "undiagnosed illness"). Mean haemoglobin levels 4 weeks after enrolment and at delivery were 12.0 and 11.6 g/dL in the AL group, and 11.9 and 11.7 g/dL in the SP group, respectively.

The incidence of non-fatal SAEs was similar (AL 21.8% [108/495] vs. SP 23.3% [118/506]). The most frequent non-fatal SAEs were related to pregnancy and birth, specifically premature delivery (AL 13.7%; SP 17.2%), stillbirth, cephalo-pelvic disproportion, and abortion. Other SAEs included infections (AL 0.6%; SP 0.8%), of which there were three cases of severe malaria in the SP group.


WHO treatment guidelines exclude artemisinin compounds for use in the first trimester of pregnancy unless there is no alternative, or the mother's life is at stake [6, 7]. Preclinical data have raised concerns for ACT exposure in early pregnancy [7, 12, 13], and yet, despite an unprecedented roll out of ACT, there are only 125 reported cases of human first trimester exposure to artemisinins, albeit with no adverse outcomes [7], a number insufficient to be reassuring regarding safety [7, 23, 24]. This report is based on maternal and birth outcomes in the largest series of prospectively followed ACT-exposed pregnancies, in which there were 495 women in the AL exposure group, and 156 were exposed during the first trimester. Outcomes were compared against SP, the most widely used anti-malarial agent administered during pregnancy. Furthermore, a prolonged follow up of infants permitted a thorough investigation of their development following anti-malarial exposure in utero.

The observed rate of perinatal mortality was 4.2% in the AL group and 5.0% in the SP group, which is comparable with other data from malaria endemic areas [2527]. There were no differences between groups with regard to neonatal mortality, maternal mortality, rates of stillbirth, low birth weight, and infant neurological development. Preterm delivery using reported LMP dates (which are notoriously unreliable) was slightly more common in the SP group (17.4%; AL group 14.1%), but the majority of infants had birth weights consistent with full-term delivery. Anti-malarial treatment was reportedly well-tolerated. Overall, 22% of 326 women with a reported test result (i.e. approximately 7% of the women in each exposure group) had an HIV-positive test. The overall profiles for AEs and SAEs were unremarkable: besides pregnancy complications, most of the commonly reported AEs and SAEs were due to infections, which were also responsible for the majority of maternal deaths.

Women with first trimester AL exposures did not have a greater perinatal mortality rate compared with SP exposure. Infant neurodevelopmental assessments were also similar, irrespective of drug exposure in first trimester. However, there were seven abortions in 159 foetuses exposed to AL in their first trimester, and no abortions in 135 foetuses exposed to SP and/or quinine in their first trimester. In four AL-exposed abortions, the women had risk factors for abortion: two women had three malaria episodes within the first trimester, one woman had syphilis diagnosed 1 week post-AL exposure, and one woman was given salbutamol for threatened abortion concomitantly with AL therapy for malaria. Furthermore, there was no clear relationship between the time at which AL exposure occurred and the occurrence of abortion; except in one case, the abortion occurred long after anti-malarial drug ingestion. Women were mainly enrolled after their first trimester and, therefore, this study could not determine the potential number of abortions that occurred during the first trimester. This may explain the lower abortion rate observed, compared with the 12-16% spontaneous abortion rate documented [28, 29]. It is difficult to draw any definite conclusions from the data, but further monitoring of first trimester exposures to AL is warranted.

The frequency of birth defects was low and the SAC did not consider that any reported defects (excluding the cases of trisomy) could be described as major. The most frequent finding was umbilical hernia (AL 4.7%; SP 2.7%) and all cases had resolved within 12 months. Umbilical hernia has been reported in rats exposed to artemisinins during gestation [30, 31]. It is commonly observed in African infants (17%-23%) [21, 22], is not generally considered as a "malformation" and the frequency reported here was less than previously documented [21, 22]. Polydactyly, another reported malformation, is also commonly found in African infants [32, 33]. Although reasons for the low incidence of major malformations in this study remain unclear, it is unlikely that major malformations (as described by van Regemorter, [34]) would have been missed. Cardiac defects were not detected as cardiac auscultation and/or echocardiograms were not routinely performed, and autopsies were not carried out on deceased infants.

With new data on more than 300 women exposed to AL (referring to index episodes) during the second and third trimester, this study substantially adds to data on the safety of artemisinins in the later stages of pregnancy in African women [35, 36], confirming previous findings that AL exposure during this period is well tolerated and has no adverse outcomes for the mother or her exposed foetus.

The study had both strengths and limitations. Firstly, it was undertaken in the context of care provided at antenatal clinics in Zambia, and represents the demographic, infectious disease, and drug exposure profile of pregnant women coming for routine care. The acquisition of drug safety data in pregnancy via clinical trials is associated with various difficulties, risks and costs [37]. Regulatory authorities now recommend observational prospective designs for detecting drug exposure risks or generating margins of reassurance regarding lack of drug exposure risk during pregnancy [38, 39]. This study followed these recommendations. The majority of women (>87% AL group) had received IPT with SP prior to enrolment or thereafter (only 51 women were exposed to AL alone), thereby protecting the women from malaria, but also confounding the evaluation of AL exposure. The index episode was unconfirmed by microscopy or rapid diagnostic test in most (85%) participants, which is normal clinical practice at the level of health centres in Zambia where the study was carried out, and it is likely that some of the women exposed to AL and SP may have had other febrile illnesses. This does not change the validity of the information collected, but prevents an analysis of whether the presence of malaria parasites (to which the artemisinins preferentially bind) changed any risk.

Gestational age was assessed by midwives either via LMP (the primary method indicated in the protocol) or through use of the Dubowitz test. The Dubowitz test has been shown to be a reliable method for assessment of gestational age in African neonates [40]. However, although all of the investigators received the same type and frequency of training from the same trainers to allow uniform standardized assessments, these results need to be interpreted with some caution as the neonatal assessments were conducted over a long duration of time at multiple sites.

A low incidence of major birth defects could either reflect a lower risk or weaknesses in identifying these risks [41]. On balance, however, as both groups were prospectively monitored without knowing the outcome, the safety data obtained reflect the unbiased outcomes of pregnancies exposed to multiple infections and multiple drugs, including anti-malarials, rather than the consequences of a single well-defined treatment for a single infectious episode.


With increasing resistance to SP, establishing the margin of safety of ACT in pregnancy is critical. Results from this cohort study confirm that exposure to AL during later pregnancy is not associated with increased safety risks in terms of perinatal mortality, malformations, or infant neurodevelopment, but they also suggest that more safety data are required on first trimester exposure to AL and consequently for ACT in general.



artemisinin-based combination therapy


adverse event




confidence intervals


intermittent preventive treatment


last menstrual period


Study Advisory Committee


serious adverse event




World Health Organization.


  1. WHO: Malaria During Pregnancy, The Africa Malaria Report 2003. 38-43. []

  2. Steketee RW, Nahlen BL, Parise ME, Menendez C: The burden of malaria in pregnancy in malaria-endemic areas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 64 (1-2 Suppl): 28-35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Desai M, ter Kuile FO, Nosten F, McGready R, Asamoa K, Brabin B, Newman RD: Epidemiology and burden of malaria in pregnancy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 93-104. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70021-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shulman CE, Dorman EK, Cutts F, Kawuondo K, Bulmer JN, Peshu N, Marsh K: Intermittent sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine to prevent severe anaemia secondary to malaria in pregnancy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 1999, 353: 632-636. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07318-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mbaye A, Richardson K, Balajo B, Dunyo S, Shulman C, Milligan P, Greenwood B, Walraven G: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in Gambian multigravidae. Trop Med Int Health. 2006, 11: 992-1002. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01649.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. WHO: Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 2010, []

    Google Scholar 

  7. WHO: Assessment of the safety of artemisinin compounds in pregnancy. 2007, []

    Google Scholar 

  8. McGready R, Cho T, Keo NK, Thwai KL, Villegas L, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Nosten F: Artemisinin antimalarials in pregnancy: a prospective treatment study of 539 episodes of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 33: 2009-2016. 10.1086/324349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li GQ, Guo XB, Fu LC, Jian HX, Wang XH: Clinical trials of artemisinin and its derivatives in the treatment of malaria in China. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 88 (Suppl 1): S5-S6. 10.1016/0035-9203(94)90460-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang TY: Follow-up observation on the therapeutic effects and remote reactions of artemisinin (Qinghaosu) and artemether in treating malaria in pregnant women. J Trad Chinese Med. 1989, 9: 28-30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McGready R, Tan SO, Ashley EA, Pimanpanarak M, Viladpai-Nguen J, Phaiphun L, Wüstefeld K, Barends M, Laochan N, Keereecharoen L, Lindegardh N, Singhasivanon P, White NJ, Nosten F: A randomised controlled trial of artemether-lumefantrine versus artesunate for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum treatment in pregnancy. PLoS Med. 2008, 5: e253-10.1371/journal.pmed.0050253.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. White TEK, Bushdid PB, Ritter S, Laffan SB, Clark RL: Artesunate-induced depletion of embryonic erythroblasts precedes embryolethality and teratogenicity in vivo. Birth Defects Res. 2006, 77: 413-429. 10.1002/bdrb.20092.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark RL, Kumemura M, Makori , Nakata Y, Bernard F, Harrell A, White TEK, Arima A: Artesunate: developmental toxicity in monkeys. Birth Defects Res. 2006, 76: 329-[Abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sipilanyambe N, Simon JL, Chanda P, Olumese P, Snow RW, Hamer DH: From chloroquine to artemether-lumefantrine: the process of drug policy change in Zambia. Malar J. 2008, 7: 25-10.1186/1475-2875-7-25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Munjanja SP, Masona D: Zimbabwean birth weight for gestation standards. Central African J Med. 1990, 36: 144-147.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubowitz LMS, Dubowitz V, Goldberg C: Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. J Pediatr. 1970, 77: 1-10. 10.1016/S0022-3476(70)80038-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haataja L, McGready R, Arunjerdja R, Simpson JE, Mercuri E, Nosten F, Dubowitz L: A new approach for neurological evaluation of infants in resource-poor settings. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2002, 22: 355-368. 10.1179/027249302125002029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubin DE: Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Statist Assoc. 1996, 19: 473-489. 10.2307/2291635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D'Agostino RB: Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statist Med. 1998, 17: 2267-2281.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schulz KF, Cates W, O'Mara PR: Pregnancy loss, infant death and suffering: legacy of syphilis and gonorrhoea in Africa. Genitourin Med. 1987, 63: 322-

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meier DE, OlaOlorun DA, Omodele RA, Nkor SK, Tarpley JL: Incidence of umbilical hernia in African children: redefinition of "normal" and re-evaluation of indications for repair. World J Surg. 2001, 25: 645-648. 10.1007/s002680020072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ebomoyi E, Parakoyi DB, Omonisi MK: Nutritional status and umbilical hernia in Nigerian school children of different ethnic groups. J Natl Med Assoc. 1991, 83: 905-908.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dellicour S, Hall S, Chandramohan D, Greenwood B: The safety of artemisinins during pregnancy: a pressing question. Malar J. 2007, 6: 15-10.1186/1475-2875-6-15.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dellicour S, ter Kuile FO, Stergachis A: Pregnancy exposure registries for assessing antimalarial drug safety in pregnancy in malaria-endemic countries. PLoS Med. 2008, 5: e187-10.1371/journal.pmed.0050187.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McDermott JM, Wirima JJ, Steketee RW, Breman JG, Heymann DL: The effect of placental malaria infection on perinatal mortality in rural Malawi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996, 55: 61-65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumala T, Vaahtera M, Ndekha M, Koivisto AM, Cullinan T, Salin ML, Ashorn P: The importance of preterm births for peri- and neonatal mortality in rural Malawi. Paediatr Perinatal Epidemiol. 2000, 14: 219-226. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00270.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van Geertruyden JP, Thomas F, Erhart A, D'Alessandro U: The contribution of malaria in pregnancy to perinatal mortality. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 71: 35-40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Everett C: Incidence and outcome of bleeding before the 20th week of pregnancy: prospective study from general practice. BMJ. 1997, 315: 32-34.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mills JL, Simpson JL, Driscoll SG, Jovanovic-Peterson L, Van Allen M, Aarons JH, Metzger B, Bieber FR, Knopp RH, Holmes LB: Incidence of spontaneous abortion among normal women and insulin-dependent diabetic women whose pregnancies were identified within 21 days of conception. NEJM. 1988, 319: 1617-1623. 10.1056/NEJM198812223192501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. China Cooperative Research Group on Qinghaosu and its Derivatives as Anti-malarials: Studies on the toxicity of Qinghaosu and its derivatives. J Tradit Chin Med. 1982, 2: 31-36.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Clarke RL: Embryotoxicity of the artemisinin antimalarials and potential consequences for use in women in the first trimester. Reprod Toxicol. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  32. Simpkiss M, Lowe A: Congenital abnormalities in the African newborn. Arch Child Dis. 1961, 404-406. 10.1136/adc.36.188.404.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kromberg JG, Jenkins T: Common birth defects in South African Blacks. S Afr Med J. 1982, 16: 599-602.

    Google Scholar 

  34. van Regemorter N, Dodion J, Druart C, Hayez F, Vamos E, Flament-Durand J, Perlmutter-Cremer N, Rodesch F: Congenital malformations in 10,000 consecutive births in a university hospital: need for genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. J Pediatr. 1984, 104: 386-390. 10.1016/S0022-3476(84)81100-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Adam I, Ali DM, Abdalla MA: Artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria during pregnancy in eastern Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 100: 632-635. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.09.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Deen JL, von Seidlein L, Pinder M, Walraven GE, Greenwood BM: The safety of the combination artesunate and pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine given during pregnancy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 95: 424-428. 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90204-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ward SA, Sevene EJP, Hastings IM, Nosten F, McGready R: Antimalarial drugs and pregnancy: safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacovigilance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007, 7: 136-144. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70025-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. U.S Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research: Guidance for industry: establishing pregnancy exposure registries. 2002, []

    Google Scholar 

  39. European Medicines Agency: Guideline on exposure to medicinal products during pregnancy: need for post-authorisation data. 2005, []

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dawodu AH, Effiong CE: Assessment of gestational age in full term and preterm African newborn infants. Nig J Pediat. 1977, 4: 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sayed AR, Bourne D, Pattinson R, Nixon J, Henderson B: Decline in the prevalence of neural tube defects following folic acid fortification and its cost-benefit in South Africa. Birth Defects Res. 2008, 82: 211-216. 10.1002/bdra.20442.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The Authors would like to sincerely acknowledge the National Malaria Control Programme in Zambia for their unrelenting support during the conduct of this study, and also thank the study participants and local staff, without whom this study would not have been possible. The local staff consisted of:

Choma site: Dr David Chibuye, Lucia Adams, Alice Changuba, Grace Chulu, Zodwa Hamweene, Berriate Hambwalu, Catherine Mabeta, Margaret C. Muchanga, Mary Mudenda, Tisa Muyola, Siphiwe Mwaba, Idah Nyanga, and the Laboratory staff at Choma Hospital and Shampande Clinic. Lusaka site: Dr Anthony Yeta, Happy Chipulu, Christine Tembo, Christine Omara, and laboratory staff from Chipata clinic. Ndola site: Dr Ignace Gashongore, Elizabeth N'gambi, Rachael Simutowe, Lungowe Musonda, Bupe Luyi, Lister Katongo, Margret Kaumba, Charity Chifita, and the Laboratory staff from Chipulukusu and Lubuto clinics.

The authors would also like to thank Professor C Chintu from the University of Zambia (Lusaka, Zambia), and J Lilienthal from DATAMAP GmbH (Freiburg, Germany) for their participation in the Study Advisory Committee, as well as Dr G Chongwe, J Mthetwa, AC Marrast, F Oladiran, N Mulure, O Nwaiwu, G Mani-Caplazi, P Ibarra de Palacios, and K Andriano.

This study was co-sponsored by Novartis Pharma and WHO. The sponsors were responsible for data collection and analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out by DATAMAP GmbH (Freiburg, Germany), and the authors particularly thank M Wibberg and T Widmayer. Medical writing assistance was provided by Dr D Brocksmith (Brocksmith Scientific Ltd, UK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Manyando.

Additional information

Competing interests

CM, RM, LP, MS, EM, EN, MCh, and FMS received payments to attend meetings related to the study. VW, RS, and MCo are all full time employees of Novartis Pharma and VW and MCo hold stock ownership therein. MG is a full time employee of the WHO. For the duration of the study and manuscript preparation period, MV was a full time employee of Novartis Pharma and holds stock ownership therein. For the duration of the study, IR worked as a full-time consultant for the WHO.

Authors' contributions

The authors of this manuscript were involved in study design, data interpretation, and the writing of the report, or in a combination of these activities. All authors had full access to study data and held equal final responsibility for the decision to submit this report for publication. All authors contributed either to the design of the study or assisted with data interpretation. CM and MV coordinated the study and supervised enrolment and patient follow-up. VW, RS, MV and CM participated in data entry, collection, and analysis of data. All authors participated in the preparation of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Christine Manyando, Rhoda Mkandawire, Lwipa Puma, Moses Sinkala, Evans Mpabalwani, Eric Njunju, Melba Gomes, Isabela Ribeiro, Verena Walter, Mailis Virtanen, Raymond Schlienger, Marc Cousin, Miriam Chipimo and Frank M Sullivan contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manyando, C., Mkandawire, R., Puma, L. et al. Safety of artemether-lumefantrine in pregnant women with malaria: results of a prospective cohort study in Zambia. Malar J 9, 249 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: