Open Access

Evaluation of chloroquine therapy for vivax and falciparum malaria in southern Sumatra, western Indonesia

  • Inge Sutanto1Email author,
  • Dedeh Endawati2,
  • Liem Hui Ling3,
  • Ferdinand Laihad4,
  • Rianto Setiabudy5 and
  • J Kevin Baird6, 7
Malaria Journal20109:52

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-52

Received: 2 October 2009

Accepted: 12 February 2010

Published: 12 February 2010

Abstract

Background

Chloroquine was used as first-line treatment for Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax in Indonesia before the initial launch of artemisinin combination therapy in 2004. A study to evaluate efficacies of chloroquine against P. falciparum and P. vivax was undertaken at Lampung in southern Sumatra, western Indonesia in 2002.

Methods

Patients infected by P. falciparum or P. vivax were treated with 25 mg/kg chloroquine base in three daily doses over 48 hr. Finger prick blood was collected on Days 0, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 after starting drug administration. Whole blood chloroquine and its desethyl metabolite were measured on Days-0, -3 and -28, or on the day of recurrent parasitaemia.

Results

42 patients infected by P. falciparum were enrolled, and 38 fullfilled criteria for per protocol analysis. Only six of 38 (16%) showed a response consistent with senstivity to chloroquine. 25 of 32 failures were confirmed resistant by demonstrating chloroquine levels on day of recurrence exceeding the minimally effective concentration (200 ng/mL whole blood). The 28-day cumulative incidence of resistance in P. falciparum was 68% (95% CI: 0.5260 - 0.8306). Thirty one patients infected by P. vivax were enrolled, and 23 were evaluable for per protocol analysis. 15 out of 23 (65%) subjects had persistent or recurrent parasitaemia. Measurement of chloroquine levels confirmed all treatment failures prior to Day-15 as resistant. Beyond Day-15, 4 of 7 recurrences also had drug levels above 100 ng/mL and were classified as resistant. The 28-day cumulative incidence of chloroquine resistance in P. vivax was 43% (95% CI: 0.2715 - 0.6384).

Conclusion

These findings confirm persistantly high levels of resistance to chloroquine by P. falciparum in southern Sumatra, and suggest that high-grade and frequent resistance to chloroquine by P. vivax may be spreading westward in the Indonesia archipelago.

Background

Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax each cause an estimated one to two million cases of malaria in Indonesia each year (SEARO). In 2004, the Ministry Health of Indonesia abandoned chloroquine as first-line treatment for P. falciparum and adopted artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). Evidence of high levels of chloroquine resistance by P. falciparum from various areas of Indonesia drove this decision [17].

In contrast, high levels of chloroquine-resistant P. vivax were reported only in hyper- to holoendemic West Papua in the eastern part of Indonesia [6, 810]. Even though evidence of this problem first appeared nearly 20 years ago, chloroquine remained the front-line therapy for vivax malaria. However, in 2007 the Ministry of Health adopted ACT for vivax malaria in some parts of West Papua in far eastern Indonesia. Evidence from the western islands of Indonesia between 1992 until 1998, revealed relatively low risk (approx. 10%) of chloroquine- resistant P. vivax[3, 1115]. Nonetheless, in 2008 national treatment policy was changed to apply artesunate-amodiaquine as first-line therapy for vivax malaria throughout Indonesia. However, that policy applies only to confirmed vivax malaria, and cases diagnosed clinically still receive chloroquine or sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine as first-line therapy. Moreover, widespread over-the-counter trade in chloroquine may persist even longer. Thus, although this study was undertaken prior to recent changes in malaria therapy policy, the findings nonetheless bear upon persisting contemporary treatment practices.

Methods

Study location

The study was conducted from June to September 2002 at Hanura Health Center in Lampung Province, southern Sumatra. This health center covers a population resident between 105° - 106° eastern longitude and 5° - 6° southern latitude at the southern-most tip of Sumatra island. Shrimp farming represented a major economic activity and the ponds used in this industry, when neglected and overgrown with algal mats, created breeding sites for Anopheles sundaicus, an efficient and important malaria vector in the region [16]. The rainy season in southern Sumatra occurs from September until April, whereas the rest of the year is relatively dry. Pribadi et al first reported chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum from this area in 1981 [2]. The health center was nonetheless using chloroquine for first-line treatment of both falciparum and vivax malaria at the time of this study.

Study subjects

A protocol detailing the work reported here was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia. Patients with fever or history of fever in the last 48 hours were screened for mono- infection by P. falciparum or P. vivax based on microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained thick blood films. Inclusion criteria for either infection was age ≥ 1 year, parasite count ≥ 1,000 asexual parasites/μL blood and patients willing to sign informed consent. The exclusion criteria were mixed infection of plasmodia, pregnancy (HCG urine test), complicated or severe malaria, or history of drug allergies. Qualified patients provided informed consent and were enrolled in the study.

The total dose of chloroquine was 25 mg base/kg body weight over 48 hr (Day-0 & Day-1: 10 mg/kb and Day-2: 5 mg/kg). All doses were directly observed by a member of the research team. If subjects vomited within the first 30 min after drug administration, the treatment was repeated. If subjects vomited a second time they were withdrawn from the study. A qualitative check on chloroquine consumption prior to visiting the health center was done by Dill-Glazko urine test [17], but test outcome was not a criterion for excluding patients from enrollment.

Subjects were asked to come back to the health center on Day-1, -2, -3, -7, -14, -21, and -28, or at any time they had fever. At each visit, except on Day-1, blood was collected for microscopic examination for parasites, as well as for measuring chloroquine level (100 μL dried on Whatman #1 filter paper). Axillary temperature was measured at each visit.

Treatment response

Treatment outcomes for P. falciparum were classified as early treatment failure (ETF), late treatment failures (LTF) and adequate clinical and parasitological responses (ACPR) based on the WHO protocol [18]. In brief, the criteria for ETF is parasitaemia on Day-3 with axilary temperature ≥ 37.5°C or density of parasitaemia on Day-2 is higher than Day-0 (≥ 75%) or density of parasitaemia on Day-3 is ≥ 25% of Day-0 or clinical condition of subjects becomes severe on Day-1, Day-2 or Day-3 with positive parasitaemia. Patients were categorized as LTF if between Day-4 and Day-28 parasitaemia reappeared with an axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C or when parasitaemia recurred on Day-7, -14, -21 and -28 with axillary temperature < 37.5°C or subjects suffers from severe condition with positive parasitaemia between Day-4 until Day-28. Patients were classified having ACPR if within 28 days follow up did not show any signs of ETF or LTF.

Gauging and classifying the treatment response by P. vivax was as applied elsewhere [19, 20]. In brief, direct treatment failures occurred if parasitaemia ≥ 25% Day-0 persisted to Day-3. Early treatment failure occurred if parasitaemia at any level persisted until Day-4. A recurrence failure occurred if parasitaemia became subpatent but reappeared between Day-5 and Day-28 after initiating treatment, and appeared with >100 ng chloroquine and its major metabolite, desethyl-chloroquine (CQ+DCQ) per mL whole blood [21]. Infections were classified as sensitive to chloroquine if parasitaemia was not detectable by Day-3 and no recurrent parasitaemia occurred up to Day-28.

Subjects were withdrawn from the study if they failed to appear on scheduled follow-up visits, if they showed intercurrent parasitaemia by another species of Plasmodium, or if they had a recurrent parasitaemia by the same species but with chloroquine levels below the minimally effective concentration for that species (< 200 ng/mL or < 100 ng/mL for P. falciparum and P. vivax, respectively).

Alternative treament with quinine (3 × 10 mg/kg bw for 7 days) was offered to subjects having recurrent parasitaemia. Plasmodium vivax infected patients were also treated with primaquine (0.25 mg/kg per day × 14 d) at the end of follow up period or together with quinine when they failed. Outcome of or compliance to alternative therapies was not monitored.

Chloroquine levels

Chloroquine measurements were done with the assistance of the U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit #2 in Jakarta, Indonesia using their high performance liquid chromatorgraphy (HPLC) instruments [22]. Whole blood total chloroquine levels consisted of the sum of CQ and DCQ, and was quantified on Day-0 (before treatment), Day-3, Day-28 or on the day of recurrent parasitaemia.

Statistical analyses

Data were double-entered into an ExcellTM database, corrected, locked and entered into an SPSS version 16.0 for uni- and bi-variate analysis applying p ≤ 0.05 as the limit of statistical significance. The cumulative risk of treatment failure was estimated using the life table method as described elsewhere [8], and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with Stata software

Results

Screening patients

3,154 patients came to the health center between June and September 2002, and 676 (21%) were screened for malaria by microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood films, of which 392 (58%) were found to be parasitaemic. These were P. falciparum (53% = 207/392), P. vivax (43% = 168/392) and mixed infection of P. falciparum and P. vivax (4% = 17/392). Confirmed malaria thus accounted for approximately 10% of patients seeking medical attention at this health center.

Only 82 (39%) of 207 P. falciparum-infected patients fullfilled the inclusion criteria. 123 had parasite counts of less than 1,000/μL blood, one had a positive pregnancy test and another declined informed consent. 42 of the eligible subject were randomized to this study and received chloroquine therapy. The remaining 40 were randomized to another protocol with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, and will be reported separately. Among the patients with P. vivax, only 31 of 137 (23%) had >1,000 asexual forms/μL, and all of these were enrolled in the current study.

Demographic, clinical and parasitological characteristics

The sex ratio in both groups (P. falciparum and P. vivax) was comparable (Table 1). The age of P. vivax-infected subjects was not distinct from P. falciparum-infected subjects. On the day of enrolment, 62% and 48% of P. falciparum and P. vivax subjects were febrile, respectively. The geometric mean of parasite density was higher in P. falciparum (8,759/μL) than P. vivax (5,468/μL) subjects (Table 1). In both groups about one quarter of subjects had positive Dill-Glazko urine tests for chloroquine prior to supervised treatment.
Table 1

Demographic & clinical characteristics of subjects

Characteristic

P. falciparum

P. vivax

Number of subjects

42

31

Age (years)(median) (inter quartile range)

12 (7 - 17)

12.8 (1 - 60)

Male (percentage)

18 (43%)

14 (45%)

Body temperature on Day-0 (°C)(mean)(range)

37.8 (35.2 - 39.8)

37.6 (35.3 - 39.9)

Feverish patients on Day-0 (%)

26 (62%)

15 (48%)

Positive Dill Glazko in urine on Day-0 (%)

10 (24%)

8 (26%)

Geometric mean of parasite density on Day-0 (range)

8,758/μL (1,000-62,720)

5,468/μL (1,240 -41,720)

Whole blood chloroquine levels

33 of 42 enrolled subjects infected by P. falciparum had chloroquine levels measured. On the day of enrollment, 15 of the 33 subjects (46%) had chloroquine in blood between 67 to 267 ng/mL (3 of these were above the minimally effective concentration of 200 ng/mL). There was no correlation between chloroquine level on Day-0 and Day-3 (Pearson correlation: r = 0.014, p value = 0.937). Furthermore, neither CQ+DCQ level on Day-0 nor density of parasitaemia on Day-0 correlated with treatment failure (Fisher exact test: CQ Day-0: p value = 0.686, OR = 1.417, 95% CI = 0.259 - 7.763; Parasite density Day-0: p value = 1.000, OR = 1.000, 95% CI = 0.175 -5.710).

Chloroquine blood levels were measured before supervised treatment in 23 of the 31 P. vivax-infected subjects, and 14 (65%) had chloroquine levels between 92 ng/mL to 392 ng/mL, all of these had CQ + DCQ above minimally inhibitory concentration of ≥ 100 ng/mL except one (92 ng/mL). There was no correlation between CQ+DCQ level on Day-0 and Day-3 (Pearson correlation: r = 0.007, p value = 0.974). Neither CQ+DCQ level on Day-0 (Fisher exact: p value = 0.400, OR = 2.625, 95% CI = 0.395 - 17.458) nor density of parasitaemia on Day-0 (Fisher exact: p value = 0.667, OR = 1.905, 95% CI = 0.330 - 11.009) were associated with treatment failure.

The risk of treatment failure with relatively low peak levels of chloroquine (Day-3) was assessed by comparing the median of total chloroquine level among failed and successfully treated subjects. In 33 P. falciparum subjects, chloroquine levels on Day-3 were significantly higher in successfull than failed subjects (Mann-Whitney: sums rank of success versus failures were 379 vs 182, p value = 0.001) (Figure 1). Nevertheless, in 23 P. vivax subjects the differences were not significant (Mann-Whitney: sums rank of success versus failures were 162 vs 114, p value = 0.245) (see Figure 2). This smaller sample may lack adequate power to detect such differences.
Figure 1

Chloroquine level on Day-3 of P. falciparum subjects. The median chloroquine level on Day-3 was significantly lower in failed than succeed groups of P. falciparum subjects (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.001). Case number 16 was the outlier of failed subject with chloroquine level of 703 ng/mL.

Figure 2

Chloroquine level on Day-3 of P. vivax subjects. The median chloroquine level on Day-3 was indifferent in failed and succeed groups of P. vivax subjects (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.254). Case number 44, 60 & 58 were the outliers of failed subject with chloroquine level of 599, 691 and 827 ng/mL, respectively.

28 day test outcomes

Among 42 subjects infected by P. falciparum, 38 were evaluated based on per protocol analysis. Two were withdrawn due to mixed infections (Day 14 & 21), and two subjects did not reappear at the health center after Day-3 and -21. 16% (6/38) of failures occurred during peak drug levels (Day-2: 5 subjects; Day-3: 1 subject). Another nine (24%) failures occurred on Day-7, so that a total of 40% of treatment failures with P. falciparum occured within the first week. During Week-2 another 13 subjects (34%) had recurrent parasitaemia, and during Week-3 and Week-4 this occurred among three (8%) and one (3%) subject, respectively. The total proportion of chloroquine treatment failures was 84% (32/38) among P. falciparum-infected subjects.

Among 31 P. vivax subjects, 23 were evaluated based on per protocol analysis. Three dropped out (2 on Day-7 and 1 on Day-21) without citing reasons, and five withdrew due to intercurrent infection of P. falciparum (three on Day-21 and two on Day-28). Among subjects experiencing treament failure, one showed increasing numbers of parasites on Day-2 (6,640 vs. 7,120 parasites/μL) and was classified as a direct treatment failure. Three subjects showed decreased parasitaemia from Day-0 to Day-2 or Day-3 (2,680 vs. 280 parasites/μL; 2,200 vs. 360 parasites/μL; & 2,640 vs. 200 parasites/μL). These three parasitaemias persisted to Day-7 and were classified as early treament failures. Eleven subjects had recurrent parasitaemia by Day-14 (4), Day-21 (6) and Day-28 (1). These were classified as recurrence treatment failures. The crude proportion of chloroquine treatment failures among P. vivax-infected subjects was 65% (15/23).

Life table analyses

Life table analysis does not censor withdrawn subjects until the day of loss. In P. falciparum-infected subjects, 10% (6 subjects) failed at peak drug levels on Day-2 &-3, but only four of them (three on Day-2 and one on Day-3) had chloroquine levels that confirmed resistance. The other 2 subjects on Day-2 did not have available blood blots for drug measurement (Table 2). All failures on Day-7 (9 participants) were resistant, and the 7-day cumulative incidence of failure was 33%. Furthermore, on Day-14, 21 & 28 some subjects could not be confirmed as resistant (three, one and one subject, respectively) due to CQ+DCQ level being < 200 ng/mL. At Day-14 the estimated cumulative incidence of therapeutic failure was 61%. This estimate was 68% by Day-28 (95% CI: 0.5260 - 0.8306). Among P. vivax- infected subjects, all treatment failures up to Day-14 were confirmed resistant (8 subjects) (Table 3), and beyond Day-14 four of seven recurrent parasitaemias were confirmed as resistant by CQ+DCQ levels >100 ng/mL. The cumulative incidence of confirmed resistance was estimated to be 3% at Day-3, 13% at Day-7, 27% at Day-14, and 43% at Day-28 (95% CI: 0.2715 - 0.6384).
Table 2

Life table estimation of cumulative incidence of chloroquine resistance in P. falciparum

Day

N

I

W

IR

CIR

95% Confidence Interval

0

42

0

0

0

0

------

2

42

3

2

0.0731

0.0731

0.0242 - 0.2100

3

37

1

1

0.0274

0.0984

0.0382 - 0.2418

7

35

9

0

0.2571

0.3302

0.2069 - 0.5004

14

26

10

4

0.4167

0.6093

0.4578 - 0.7640

21

12

2

3

0.1905

0.6837

0.5260 - 0.8306

28

7

0

1

0

0.6837

0.5260 - 0.8306

D = Day of the test

N = number of subjects remaining at risk

I = incident of resistant cases

W = withdrawals due to intercurrent parasitaemia by P. vivax or loss to follow up or

parasitaemia positive with CQ level <200 ng/mL

IR = Interval risk (i{N-(w/2)}-1

CIRn = cumulative incidence of resistant case

= 1-(1-IRn × 1-CIRn-1) where n is day of test and n-1 is the prior interval, w.g. for calculating CIR day 14, use IR day 14 and CIR day 7

Table 3

Life table estimation of cumulative incidence of chloroquine resistance in P. vivax

Day

N

I

W

IR

CIR

95% Confidence Interval

0

31

0

0

0

0

----

2

31

1

0

0.0333

0.0323

0.0046 - 0.2077

3

30

0

0

0

0.0323

0.0046 - 0.2077

7

30

3

2

0.1034

0.1324

0.0518 - 0.3153

14

25

4

0

0.16

0.2712

0.1457 - 0.4703

21

21

4

6

0.2222

0.4331

0.2715 - 0.6384

28

11

0

3

0

0.4331

0.2715 - 0.6384

D = Day of the test

N = number of subjects remaining at risk

I = incident of resistant cases

W = withdrawals due to intercurrent parasitaemia by P. falciparum or loss to follow up or

parasitaemia positive with CQ level < 100 ng/mL

IR = Interval risk (i{N-(w/2)}-1

CIRn = cumulative incidence of resistant case

= 1-(1-IRn × 1-CIRn-1) where n is day of test and n-1 is the prior interval, w.g. for calculating CIR day 14, use IR day 14 and CIR day 7

Discussion

This small study documented the 28-day cumulative incidence of chloroquine-resistance in P. falciparum (68%) and P. vivax (43%) infections acquired in southern Sumatra in western Indonesia in 2002. In earlier studies in this region, chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum[2] and Plasmodium malariae[23] were reported, although the latter diagnosis has been debated [24]. Nonetheless, at the time of our work, chloroquine remained first-line therapy for falciparum malaria throughout Indonesia. This was finally changed in 2004 to artesunate combined with amodiaquine, although even today only for confirmed infections. The very high levels of resistance documented here affirm the necessity of that change in policy and practice, but these data also serve as a basis for comparison with the same phenomenon in vivax malaria, against which chloroquine remains in wide use.

Studies conducted in Indonesia between 1992 and 2001 documented chloroquine-resistant P. vivax (CRPV) occurring at > 40% risk in Indonesian New Guinea (Papua, formerly Irian Jaya) [6, 810]. Similar surveys in central and western Indonesia, however, revealed relatively low risk (<20%) [3, 1115]. The apparent isolation of high risk of CRPV to Indonesian New Guinea encouraged health authorities to maintain chloroquine as the national first-line therapy for vivax malaria. This was even true in Papua until 2007 when a location-specific treatment policy trial was instituted in the area of Timika, where more recent studies also documented very high risk of CRPV [10, 25]. That first line therapy for Timika is dihydroartemisinin combined with piperaquine, and has been under evaluation by the authorities.

Very recently, in 2008, the Ministry of Health reached a decision to recommend artesunate-amodiaquine as first-line therapy against vivax malaria as national treatment policy. This combination therapy is now recommended as first-line treatment for either P. falciparum or P. vivax across Indonesia. However, many diagnoses of malaria in Indonesia today are made clinically or non-specifically, and such cases still receive chloroquine or sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine therapies. No study has yet gauged the extent and rate of specific diagnoses and ACT treatment, and how these practices impact metrics of malaria risk in any given area.

The findings in the current study, and another recently reported trial [19], corroborate the description of the CRPV situation on the Indonesian archipelago as worsening. In our other study on Alor Island in the eastern Lesser Sundas Archipelago, the 28-day risk of CRPV was estimated at 56%. The current study, approximately 3,000 km west of Papua, found a 43% risk of CRPV, well above the prior studies in western Indonesia ranging from 0% to 20% [3, 1115]. Recent work from Myanmar [26] also suggests a westward encroachment of CRPV. With India representing the nexus of the global vivax malaria burden [27], this trend merits aggressive surveillance.

Surveillance of CRPV has been hampered by the low priority assigned to vivax malaria by donors, sponsors and health agencies. More than two decades after the emergence of evidence of a serious resistance problem, the number of surveys of CRPV in that interim anywhere in the world numbers less than a few dozen. Another inhibiting factor has been the unavailability of a standardized testing procedure, or the application of procedures rooted in those for falciparum malaria and poorly suited for vivax malaria. The analytical methodology applied here and in another recent study [19] derived from earlier work [21], and the terminology classifying outcomes as sensitive or direct, early or recurrent treatment failures is our own. These methods and terminologies are useful and analytically sound in the narrow context of characterizing resistance to chloroquine by asexual blood stages of P. vivax. The rationale underpinning these approaches hinge upon pharmacokinetics unique to chloroquine and upon the specific sensitivities of P. vivax isolates that may be considered unambiguously a sensitive phenotype.

In this study, 77% of otherwise eligible subjects with vivax malaria were excluded on the basis of an arbitrary minimal parasite count of 1,000/μL. This experience encouraged us to subsequently abandon such a potentially powerful source of confounding by sample bias. We acknowledge that such systemic sample bias may in part explain the apparently high rate of resistance recorded in this study. A sample that included the median parasitemia in this community would have very likely produced a lower cumulative incidence of recurrences and more truly represented risk of therapeutic failure in the study area.

Conclusions

The findings in this study represent only a few dozen patients from the catchment area of a single health center in southern Sumatra, Indonesia. Further surveillance for CRPV should be carried out in the region to more reliably characterize risk of CRPV. This is true even though chloroquine is no longer first-line therapy for vivax malaria in Indonesia. Some years may pass before existing stocks of chloroquine become exhausted and the drug is likely to see fairly extensive use, including through private marketers catering to a brisk over-the-counter trade in this drug.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr PR Arbani for making this study possible, Dr Heri Joko Subandrio and staff of Lampung provincial health office and Endah Setyaningrum from University of Lampung for kind support and cooperation. We also thank Parlentar Naibaho for reading malaria blood smears, staffs of the Hanura Health Center (Dr Reny Indrayani, Ida Manuli, Eti Martini, Heni Suryani, Lies Setyaningsih, Retno Setyawati, Khairulah Nasution) for their dedicated field work, and Dr JD Maguire and B Leksana for providing HPLC facilities and Purnomo Projodipuro for cross-checking malaria blood smears at the US Naval Medical Research Unit #2 in Jakarta. The kind help from Kasia Stepniewska for statistical consultation is very much appreciated. Financial support: This study was supported by WHO SEARO, New Delhi. This manuscript was prepared in part through participation in a course on scientific writing organized and sponsored by the Southeast Asian Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Network, and the authors gratefully acknowledge that support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Parasitology Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia
(2)
National Agency for Drug and Food Control, Ministry of Health
(3)
Post Graduate Study Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia
(4)
Malaria Subdirectorate, Communicable Disease Control, Ministry of Health
(5)
Department of Pharmacology Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia
(6)
Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit
(7)
Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Oxford University

References

  1. Ebisawa I, Fukuyama T, Kawamura Y: Additional foci of chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria in East Kalimantan and West Irian, Indonesia. Trop Geogr Med. 1976, 28: 349-354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pribadi W, Dakung LS, Gandahusada S, Daldiyono: Chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum infection from Lampung and South Sumatra, Indonesia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1981, 12 (1): 69-73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fryauff DJ, Soekartono , Tuti S, Leksana B, Suradi , Tandayu S, Baird JK: Survey of resistance in vivo to chloroquine of Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 92: 82-83. 10.1016/S0035-9203(98)90966-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pribadi W, Sutanto I, Atmosoedjono S, Rasidi R, Surya LK, Susanto L: Malaria situation in several villages around Timika, south central Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1998, 29: 228-235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Maguire JD, Lacy MD, Sururi , Sismadi P, Krisin , Wiady I, Laksana B, Bangs MJ, Masbar S, Susanti I, Basuki W, Barcus MJ, Marwoto H, Edstein MD, Tjokrosonto S, Baird JK: Chloroquine or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the treatment of uncomplicated, Plasmodium falciparum malaria during an epidemic in Central Java, Indonesia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002, 96: 655-668. 10.1179/000349802125002310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sumawinata IW, Bernadeta , Leksana B, Sutamihardja A, Purnomo , Subianto B, Sekartuti , Fryauff DJ, Baird JK: Very high risk of therapeutic failure with chloroquine for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax malaria in Indonesian Papua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 416-420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sutanto I, Supriyanto S, Ruckert P, Purnomo , Maguire JD, Bangs MJ: Comparative efficacy of chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria and impact on gametocyte carriage rates in the East Nusatenggara province of Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 70: 467-473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baird JK, Wiady I, Fryauff DJ, Sutanihardja MA, Leksana B, Widjaya H, Kysdarmanto , Subianto B: In vivo resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum at Nabire, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997, 56: 627-631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Taylor WR, Widjaja H, Richie TL, Basri H, Ohrt C, Tjitra , Taufik E, Jones TR, Kain KC, Hoffman SL: Chloroquine/doxycycline combination versus chloroquine alone, and doxycycline alone for the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria in Northeastern Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 64: 223-228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ratcliff A, Siswantoro H, Kenangalem E, Wuwung M, Brockman A, Edstein MD, Laihad F, Ebsworth EP, Anstey NM, Tjitra E, Price RN: Therapeutic response of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax to chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in southern Papua, Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 101: 351-359. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.06.008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Baird JK, Sismadi P, Masbar S, Leksana B, Sekartuti , Ramzan A, Tjitra E: Chloroquine sensitive Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax in central Java, Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996, 90: 412-413. 10.1016/S0035-9203(96)90527-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Baird JK, Sustriayu Nalim MF, Basri H, Masbar S, Leksana B, Tjitra E, Dewi RM, Khairani M, Wignall FS: Survey of resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax in Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996, 90: 409-411. 10.1016/S0035-9203(96)90526-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fryauff DJ, Baird JK, Candradikusuma D, Masbar S, Sutamihardja MA, Leksana B, Tuti S, Marwoto H, Richie T, Romzan A: Survey of in vivo sensitivity to chloroquine by Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax in Lombok, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997, 56: 241-244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fryauff DJ, Tuti S, Mardi A, Masbar S, Patipelohi R, Leksana B, Kain KC, Bangs MJ, Richie TL, Baird JK: Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax in transmigration settlements of West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 59: 513-518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fryauff DJ, Leksana B, Masbar S, Wiady I, Sismadi P, Susanti AI, Nagesha HS, Syafruddin, Atmosoedjono S, Bangs MJ, Baird JK: The drug sensitivity and trasmission dynamics of human malaria on Nias island, North Sumatra, Indonesia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002, 96: 447-462. 10.1179/000349802125001249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dusfour I, Harbach RE, Manguin S: Bionomics and systematics of the oriental Anopheles sundaicus complex in relation to malaria transmission and vector control. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 71: 518-524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lelijveld J, Kortmann H: The eosin colour test of Dill and Glazko: a simple field test to detect chloroquine in urine. Bull World Health Organ. 1970, 42: 477-479.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. WHO: Assessment of therapeutic efficacy of antimalarial drugs for uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Version3. Draft March 3, 2001. Geneva: Division of Control Tropical Diseases, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  19. Sutanto I, Suprijanto S, Nurhayati , Manoempil P, Baird JK: Resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax at Alor in the Lesser Sundas Archipelago in eastern Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 81: 338-342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Baird JK: Resistance to therapies for infection by Plasmodium vivax. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009, 22: 508-534. 10.1128/CMR.00008-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Baird JK, Leksana B, Masbar S, Fryauff DJ, Sutanihardja MA, Suradi , Wignall FS, Hoffman SL: Diagnosis of resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax: timing of recurrence and whole blood chloroquine levels. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997, 56: 621-626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Patchen LC, Mount DL, Schwartz IK, Churchill FC: Analysis of filter-paper-absorbed, finger-stick blood samples for chloroquine and its major metabolite using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr. 1983, 278: 81-89. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)84758-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Maguire JD, Sumawinata IW, Masbar S, Laksana B, Prodjodipuro P, Susanti I, Sismadi P, Mahmud N, Bangs MJ, Baird JK: Choroquine-resistant Plasmodium malariae in south Sumatra, Indonesia. Lancet. 2002, 360: 58-60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09336-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Collins WE, Jeffery GM: Extended clearance time after treatment of infections with Plasmodium malariae may not be indicative of resistance to chloroquine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 67: 406-410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hasugian AR, Purba HL, Kenangalem E, Wuwung RM, Ebsworth EP, Maristela R, Penttinen PM, Laihad F, Anstey NM, Tjitra E, Price RN: Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus artesunate-amodiaquine: superior efficacy and posttreatment prophylaxis against multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 44: 1067-1074. 10.1086/512677.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Guthmann JP, Pittet A, Lesage A, Imwong M, Lindegardh N, Min Lwin M, Zaw T, Annerberg A, de Radiguȇs X, Nosten F: Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine in Dawei, southern Myanmar. Trop Med Int Health. 2008, 13: 91-98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Srivastava HC, Yadav RS, Joshi H, Valecha N, Mallick PK, Prajapati SK, Dash AP: Therapeutic responses of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum to chloroquine, in an area of western India where P. vivax predominates. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2008, 102: 471-480. 10.1179/136485908X311759.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sutanto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement