Plasmodium falciparum parasite population structure and gene flow associated to anti-malarial drugs resistance in Cambodia
- Ankit Dwivedi†1, 2, 3, 4,
- Nimol Khim†5,
- Christelle Reynes6, 7,
- Patrice Ravel2, 3, 4,
- Laurence Ma8,
- Magali Tichit8,
- Christiane Bourchier8,
- Saorin Kim5,
- Dany Dourng5,
- Chanra Khean5,
- Pheaktra Chim5,
- Sovannaroth Siv9,
- Roger Frutos10, 11,
- Dysoley Lek9,
- Odile Mercereau-Puijalon12,
- Frédéric Ariey12,
- Didier Menard5Email author and
- Emmanuel Cornillot1, 2, 3, 4Email author
© The Author(s) 2016
Received: 28 January 2016
Accepted: 2 June 2016
Published: 14 June 2016
Western Cambodia is recognized as the epicentre of emergence of Plasmodium falciparum multi-drug resistance. The emergence of artemisinin resistance has been observed in this area since 2008–2009 and molecular signatures associated to artemisinin resistance have been characterized in k13 gene. At present, one of the major threats faced, is the possible spread of Asian artemisinin resistant parasites over the world threatening millions of people and jeopardizing malaria elimination programme efforts. To anticipate the diffusion of artemisinin resistance, the identification of the P. falciparum population structure and the gene flow among the parasite population in Cambodia are essential.
To this end, a mid-throughput PCR-LDR-FMA approach based on LUMINEX technology was developed to screen for genetic barcode in 533 blood samples collected in 2010–2011 from 16 health centres in malaria endemics areas in Cambodia.
Based on successful typing of 282 samples, subpopulations were characterized along the borders of the country. Each 11-loci barcode provides evidence supporting allele distribution gradient related to subpopulations and gene flow. The 11-loci barcode successfully identifies recently emerging parasite subpopulations in western Cambodia that are associated with the C580Y dominant allele for artemisinin resistance in k13 gene. A subpopulation was identified in northern Cambodia that was associated to artemisinin (R539T resistant allele of k13 gene) and mefloquine resistance.
The gene flow between these subpopulations might have driven the spread of artemisinin resistance over Cambodia.
Plasmodium falciparum malaria is one of the most severe and wide spread parasitic disease affecting millions of humans in the world. Following the emergence and spread of multidrug resistant parasites is a major challenge. The Cambodian–Thai border is recognized as the epicentre of the emerging resistances. Plasmodium falciparum clinical malaria resistance to chloroquine was first documented in 1957 [1, 2] in this area. Later, in 1967 pyrimethamine resistance was also reported in the same region [3, 4]. Molecular epidemiological studies have confirmed that the spread of resistant parasites to these two drugs to Africa has originated from Southeast Asia . In 1990s, mefloquine resistance was consequently observed in this area and more recently, the emergence of artemisinin derivatives resistance was observed along Cambodian-Thai border [6, 7]. The reasons supporting the emergence of multidrug resistance parasites in this area are unknown. Recently, whole genome sequencing data demonstrated that P. falciparum populations were highly fragmented in Cambodia [8, 9]. Four subpopulations (KH1, KH2, KH3 and KH4) and one large admixed subpopulation (KHA) were described using samples isolated in the time period 2007–2011 . KH1 subpopulation was shown to be as the ancestral population. The KH2, KH3 and KH4 subpopulations were associated to clinical artemisinin resistance defined by a delayed of parasite clearance in the first 3 days of artesunate monotherapy or artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT)  and were later confirmed to be associated to mutations in the propeller domain of the Kelch gene (PF3D7_1343700) located on the chromosome 13 (k13) . In their report, Ariey and collaborators clearly showed that the prevalence of mutant k13 alleles, involved in artemisinin resistance, was much higher in western Cambodian provinces than in eastern Cambodia .
In this context, the present study aimed at evaluating the structure of the parasite population at a country-wide scale. Indeed, one hypothesis is that the structure of the parasite population plays an important role in the spread of k13 mutant alleles from west to east Cambodia. The parasite population structure can be assessed by following different genetic variations such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), microsatellite repeats, insertions/deletions and range of gene duplication events . Several molecular approaches have been developed to accurately detect reliable SNPs in the P. falciparum genome. For instance, a 24-SNP barcode detected by a robust TaqMan genotyping approach was described by Daniels et al. . Their analysis was performed on African and Thai isolates. At present, novel, rapid and reliable techniques based on fluorescent magnetic beads, such as the LUMINEX technology, have been developed to detect specific alleles. A rapid assay of Plasmodium typing was developed using fluorescent microspheres . This assay combined a PCR and a ligation reaction: PCR-LDR-FMA (PCR-based ligase detection reaction-fluorescent microsphere assay).
This paper describes the implementation of the PCR-LDR-FMA for the detection of an 11-SNP barcode. The presence of parasite subpopulations was evaluated and intensive gene flow over Cambodia was described to assess the spread of drug resistance. Of note, a new subpopulation was defined, highly prevalent in northern Cambodia and associated with in vitro mefloquine resistance (expressed by high mefloquine IC50 values).
Plasmodium falciparum isolates and samples size
A set of 533 blood samples collected in 2010–2011 from P. falciparum malaria patients was analysed. These samples originate from 16 health centres (11 health centres and five reference hospitals) located in 10 provinces in Cambodia. Isolates were grouped in four regions: western, southern, eastern and northern Cambodia (Additional file 1). Four control DNA samples were used to validate barcode detection (3D7, Dd2, HB3 and RO33).
DNA extraction and PCR amplification
The genomic DNA was extracted from 200 µl of blood using the DNA Mini blood kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. DNA extracts were stored at −20 °C until use. DNA from reference strains 3D7, Dd2, HB3 and RO33, provided by Malaria Research and Reference Reagent Resource Center-MR4, were used as controls. Primary PCR was carried out in 25 µL of final volume with 5 µL of DNA, 0.25 µM of each corresponding primers (Additional file 2), 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) (Solis Biodyne), 1× of reaction Buffer, 2.5 mM of MgCl2, 1.25 U FirePol® Taq DNA Polymerase (Solis Biodyne), with the following conditions: 94 °C for 15 min, then 30 cycles of a three step program (94 °C for 30 s, 52–55 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min) and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min to reach the corresponding target between 164 and 385 bp (Additional file 3).
The nested PCR was performed in 25 μl containing 0.5 μM of each primer (Additional file 2), 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) (Solis Biodyne), 1× of reaction Buffer, 2.5 mM of MgCl2, 2.5 U Taq polymerase (FirePol® DNA Polymerase, Solis Biodyne). 5 µl of the primary PCR reaction were used as the template. PCR conditions were: 94 °C for 15 min, then 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing temperature between 55 and 60 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min. A final extension at 72 °C for 10 min was performed to obtain the corresponding fragments between 100 and 200 bp. PCR of valid SNPs were performed in four multiplexed reactions (Additional file 3).
Ligation and detection assays
Nested PCR products were pooled together in two sets according to microsphere combinations. One microlitre of the pooled PCR products were used for the ligase detection reaction (LDR). The LDR was based on two allele-specific primers and one locus-specific probes (Additional file 4). The allele-specific primers were composed of two parts: the 5-prime part hybridizing with the MagPlex-Tag probe and the 3-primer part hybridizing with the PCR product. 33 different MagPlex-Tags were used to detect 40 alleles (Additional file 4) corresponding to the 20 loci which were successfully amplified by PCR (Additional file 3). Ligation was performed after hybridization of the locus-specific primer. Several MagPlex anti-Tag probes were used twice. Locus-specific probes were 5′ phosphorylated and 3′ biotinylated. LDRs were performed in a final volume of 15 µL holding in 1× of Taq Ligase buffer, 10 nM of each LDR (allele- and locus-specific primers), 4 U of Taq DNA ligase (Genesearch) and 1 µL of pooled Nested PCR. Thermocycling conditions were carried out by denaturation of the double stranded DNA at 95 °C for 1 min, followed by 32 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and hybridization at 58.0–60 °C (Additional file 3) for 2 min. Quality control was performed by using DNA from reference strains provided by MR4. Two multiplexed reactions were used to characterize final valid SNPs (Additional file 3).
Hybridization and labeling of magnetic beads
A 5 µL fraction of the LDR product was poured into 60 µL of hybridization solution TMAC buffer (3× of tetramethylammonium chloride [TMAC] (Sigma-Aldrich), 3 mM of EDTA (Gibco), 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0 (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.1 % sodium dodecyl sulfate) and 1000 beads of each MagPlex-Tag microspheres used in the multiplex LDR, as described above. Beads quantification was performed as previously described . Mixtures were heated to 95 °C for 1 min 30 s and incubated at 37 °C for 35 min to allow hybridization between SNPs-specific LDR products (Tag-probe) and bead-labeled anti-TAG probes. Then, 6 µL of 1:50 dilution of streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin (Invitrogen) in TMAC buffer was added to the post-LDR mixture and incubated at 37 °C for 20 min in 96-well plate (Eppendorf). PCR and LDR reactions were conducted in 96-well plate. The fluorescence of each allele-specific LDR products was measured on a MagPix instrument with xPonent 4.2 software (LUMINEX).
The measurement of the signal for an allele was decomposed into the signal intensity without noise and the background noise. Negative samples show reduced signal-to-noise ratio and positive samples show increased signal-to-noise ratio. The identification of negative and positive samples was based on a classification method which minimizes the variance associated to the two series of measures. This algorithm was analogous to the k-mean algorithm where k = 2. A test was used to address each measurement to the negative or positive value of the allele. Negative and positive results for the two alleles were combined to assess barcode value at considered position. Double negative results were considered as positive for the third allele at BC07 barcode position (BC07_ALT_G allele). DNA of the four reference strains 3D7, Dd2, HB3 and RO33 was introduced as the positive control on each 96-well plates. A set of 282 samples were successfully genotyped out of the 533 blood samples initially selected for the analysis, using an 11 positions barcode.
Data and statistical analysis
Comparison with the available genomic resources was performed after calling of the mutations from BAM files deposited in the ENA database for 167 samples isolated between 2007 and 2011. Correspondence of these isolates and the earlier defined subpopulations in Cambodia  was provided by O. Miotto. Alleles for the 11 barcode positions and k13 locus were recovered from the VCF files.
Average FST (fixation index) was calculated to measure the extent of genetic differentiation within health centres. It was based on 11-SNPs barcode of 282 samples. An average allele diversity value was first calculated per sampling area (Hs) from the 11-SNPs barcode. It was then compared with the allele diversity measured for the 282 samples (Ht) to obtain the average FST value, ranging from 0 (no differentiation/high diversity) to 1 (complete differentiation/low diversity: subpopulations fixed for different alleles).
To define the population structure, hierarchical clustering was performed on 282 samples described by the 11-SNPs barcode. The pairwise distances between the samples were estimated as the proportion of base substitutions between them over the barcode. Ward’s minimum variance method was used to build the dendrogram (Additional file 5A). Random sampling was performed in order to obtain robust results: the clustering approach was implemented on 10,000 subsets of 230 samples each, randomly selected out of the 282 samples. Based on these 10,000 clustering results, pairwise distances between samples were calculated as the percentage of clustering results in which two samples are in the same cluster. This distance matrix was then used to build a dendrogram for all 282 samples. The number k of final clusters (conserved groups) was selected based on the dendrogram structure (Additional file 5B). The value for k = 9, 10 and 14 were producing relevant clusters, but on comparing the barcodes with the previously defined population structure , it was observed that the clusters produced on increasing k after 9 are not associated to a specific resistant population (KH2, KH3 and KH4) and instead are related to admixed population KHA and the mixture of other resistant subpopulations. These unspecific clusters were localized close to centre of the country. Hence, the population structure was represented by nine conserved groups (G1 to G9). Weblogo was used to highlight conserved alleles among health centres in G1 to G9 groups. The groups are geolocalized by the geographical centroids on the 2D map. The coordinates for the geographical centroids are calculated as the average of the coordinates (measured in the coordinate space of the 2D map) of the health centres included in the group. To determine the groups significantly related to geographical locations, the average distance to geographical centroid within a group was compared to the average distance to the geographical centroid when the 282 samples were randomly assigned to the nine groups. The average distance for each group was compared to the average distances calculated for 5000 random re-sampling of the 282 samples within the nine conserved groups. The p value was calculated as the proportion of average values below the average distance of the health centres to the geographical centroid for each group.
Barcode of alleles from 11 variable sites
PCR fragments were successfully amplified for 20 SNPs. There were no PCR amplification for the other four SNPs and were rejected. Assays for only 13 SNPs provide interpretable LUMINEX signal (Additional file 3) and others were excluded from the assay. Out of the 13 SNPs, the locus #7 was abandoned due to non-reproducibility and non-accuracy of the detection on control DNAs and locus #5 was rejected because genotyping analysis revealed that this locus was monomorphic. Finally, 11 SNPs were validated for barcoding (BC01 to BC11). Four multiplex PCRs and two multiplex LDRs were set up for the LUMINEX detection according to their annealing temperature.
Since the work of Daniels et al. , the genome version and annotation has been improved. Databases revealed that 23 SNPs amongst the 24 were located in a coding region and they are equally distributed between synonymous and non-synonymous mutations (Additional file 6). Five SNPs were located in subtelomeric regions. Genomic analysis revealed that non detection in the locus #11 was due to the presence of two nearly identical copies of the rifin gene in which the SNP is located (Additional file 6). PlasmoDB v11.1 suggested that locus #15 corresponding locus was tri-allelic. LUMINEX data treatment was adapted for this locus. Locus #24 (BC11) was validated for LUMINEX genotyping despite its low variation in Cambodian parasite population (Additional file 6). Initial analysis was performed on 533 samples, 79 were resulting from mixed infection, 183 of the samples present no significant signal with LUMINEX for at least one barcode position and 50 samples could not be amplified using PCR for at least one locus. Among the 251 rejected samples, 59 samples show more than one type of errors (Additional file 7). Finally, 282 samples among 533 blood samples were successfully genotyped at 11 SNP loci.
Allele distribution associated to health centres
Correspondence analysis was performed using barcode of all the samples (Fig. 1a). Axis 1, 2 and 3 were explaining 21, 16 and 12 % of the information respectively. For each SNP, REF (reference 3D7) and ALT (non-reference) alleles were in opposite quadrants except for BC07 barcode position which was tri-allelic. The BC11_ALT_T allele was located at the centre of the representation as it was present in nearly all samples. Despite the low number of isolates with corresponding BC11_REF_G allele, correspondence analysis showed association of this allele with eastern and southern Cambodia. Association of alleles with health centres was questioned using Between-Class analysis (Fig. 1b). Matching of relative position of health centres in the Between-Class analysis with their geographic position suggests that some alleles show association with samples geographic origin. A strict opposition between eastern and western Cambodia was observed, which can be due to specific distribution of BC03 and BC05 alleles in samples from these areas (Fig. 1). Northern and southern localities present a similar distribution pattern in other projections (Additional file 8). Present analysis suggests that allele frequencies are in agreement with the geographic location of health centres. Pursat is not in a correct position in both correspondence and Between-class analysis. It is located in the western part of Cambodia and it clusters with eastern localities. The discrepancy with its geographic localization could be due to the BC06_ALT_T and BC07 allele frequencies.
Allele frequency gradient between localities
Presence of fixed alleles at the border of Cambodia
FST analysis and gradients of allele frequencies (Additional file 9A–J) over the country suggest gene flow in a centripetal orientation. According to high FST values, the five locations Anlong Veng, Keov Seima, Sampoev Loun, Tasanh and Trapaing Prasat might be associated with parasite subpopulations. Crossing of subpopulations could be responsible for allele diffusion over the country. Especially in western Cambodian sites, where the low FST values could result from overlap between subpopulations. This likely reflects gene flow driving the homogenization of the population.
Identification of emerging subpopulations in Cambodia
The three groups G1, G3 and G7 were significantly associated to specific geographic area (p value <0.05). The samples in these groups were mostly isolated in western Cambodia, but also include samples from the north or from the south of the country (Additional file 10). G1 includes two samples from eastern Cambodia. G3 samples were originating from western and southern Cambodia only. G7 had two samples from the southern and one from northern Cambodia. Relationship with previously described Cambodian parasite subpopulations shows that the three groups could be associated with KH2 and KH3 subpopulations. Accordingly, samples that have been probed, carried C580Y k13 mutation. Weblogos were added to the analysis to illustrate the frequency of alleles at the 11 barcode position among conserved clusters (Fig. 4). In accordance with the results presented above (Figs. 1, 2), G1 shows conserved allele positions: BC01_T, BC04_A, BC05_G, BC08_A and BC10_G. This genotype was very close to the two barcodes associated with Pailin and Ou Chra health centres. Group G3 weblogo was more reminiscent of Promoy HC barcode (Additional file 11). The barcode analysis based on 11 SNPs was efficient to describe conserved subpopulations that emerged recently in western Cambodia concomitantly with artemisinin resistance.
The three groups G2, G4 and G8, are localized in the area between north-western region and the centre of the country (Fig. 4; Additional file 10). The average distance of these groups to the geographical centroid presents a p value between 0.1 and 0.3. The two groups, G2 (n = 32) and G4 (n = 27), have samples from various localities. Most of the samples in G2 are originating from localities in southern Cambodia and include 10 samples with C580Y k13 allele. Three barcodes in this group are found in the admixed KHA subpopulation described earlier . The samples in the group G4 are mostly originating from localities in western Cambodia and include eight samples with C580Y, two samples with R539T and one sample with N458Y k13 allele. Two barcodes in this group are identified in the previously defined parasite subpopulations, one barcode is found in KH4 subpopulation (also carrying Y493H allele) and the other is found in KHA subpopulation (also carrying R539T allele). The samples in the group G8 (n = 44) are mostly originating from the localities in the north (Trapaing Prasat and Anlong Veng health centre) of the country and include four samples with C580Y and six samples with R539T k13 allele. In this group the 11 barcode loci are conserved in most of the samples and some samples have variation at BC01, BC03 and BC08 locus. Three barcodes in this group are identified in the previously defined KH3 (shown to carry R539T alleles), KH1 (ancestral population) and KHA (admixed population with C580Y alleles) subpopulations.
The three other groups G5, G6 and G9 are localized close to the centre of the country and show no significant geographical centroid p values (0.99, 0.99 and 0.44, respectively). The samples in these groups are originating from localities from all over the country. In the group G5 (n = 40) only four samples are originating from the localities in the south of Cambodia. This group includes four samples with C580Y, one sample with R539T, one sample with P553L and one sample with Y493H k13 alleles. Four barcodes of this group are identified in the KH subpopulations, two barcodes in KH1 and two barcodes in KHA. The samples in the group G6 (n = 33) are mostly coming from the localities in the southern and eastern regions of Cambodia. This group includes six samples with C580Y, one sample with I543T and one sample with V568G k13 alleles. Only one barcode of this group is identified in the KH3 subpopulation. The samples in the group G9 (n = 27) are mostly originating from the localities in eastern and western regions and 4/5 tested sample are negative for k13 allele. In this group, two barcodes are identified in the KH4 subpopulation, two barcodes in the KHA subpopulation, one barcode in KH1 subpopulation and one barcode in KH3 subpopulation. The relationship between barcodes matching the KH4 subpopulation and Y493H allele was confirmed for seven isolates of this group.
The map (Fig. 4) represents a gradient of distribution of relevant subpopulation based on barcode description from north-west to the centre of Cambodia emphasizing gene flow in that orientation. The barcodes of the groups including samples from the north-western localities are mostly associated to the KH2 and KH3 subpopulations and most of the samples carry C580Y k13 allele only. Moving towards the centre it is observed that the barcodes are associated more with the KHA, KH1 and a specific KH3 subpopulations in the north (G8). The samples are mostly carrying C580Y and R539T k13 alleles and also a rare N458Y allele in one of the samples. The groups in the centre of the country are including more barcodes associated to the KHA and KH1 subpopulations and some barcodes matching the KH3 and KH4 subpopulations. The samples are shown to carry C580Y, R539T, Y493H and the three rare mutations P553L, I543T and V568G (Additional file 10). This could suggest the localization of the admixed populations with high diversity towards the centre of the country.
Mefloquine resistance is strongly associated to northern Cambodia
Mutations in k13 gene associated with resistance to artemisinin were determined in 98 patients, as described earlier . From these patients, 70 % of the samples were positive for one of the k13 resistant alleles (C580Y, R539T, Y493H, I543T, P553L, V568G & N458Y). Artemisinin resistance was more frequent in western and northern Cambodia (Chi squared test p < 0.01). The mutant alleles Y493H, I543T, P553L, V568G, and N458Y were found once in the 282 isolates. The C580Y allele was the most prevalent (54/68 positive patients) and was found to be present in all the conserved groups. Thirty-seven different barcodes were found among these 54 samples. No association was found between the C580Y allele and 11-SNPs barcode. The R539T was the second most frequent allele (9 isolates over 68 positive patients) with six isolates belonging to G8, two to G4 and one from G5. Four isolates were from northern Cambodia, three from western and two from southern Cambodia. Barcodes of these nine samples have BC01_REF_C, BC03_ALT_A, BC04_ALT_T, BC05_REF_G, BC09_ALT_C and BC11_ALT_T in common. All these alleles were significantly associated to Trapaing Prasat health centre (Fig. 2; Additional file 11).
Implementation of 11-SNPs barcode for mid-throughput analysis
A PCR-LDR-FMA technique for the Mid-throughput detection of a barcode for P. falciparum Cambodian isolates was optimized. This strategy included multiplex PCR and ligase detection reactions prior to hybridization with magnetic microspheres (MagPlex-Tag probes). A specific algorithm was developed for signal discrimination between the 23 alleles corresponding to 11 SNPs which enabled us to characterize 282 samples. The choice of the loci was a critical step. It was based on both possibility to run detection at the corresponding locus and allele frequency. In fact, the PCR-LDR-FMA required the design of several primers at each locus. This was the main source of rejection of SNPs. Indeed, this task was hampered by the AT richness of P. falciparum genome. The frequency of alleles in the present dataset (Additional file 6) was sometimes different from the expected non-reference allele frequency (NRAF). One explanation could be that the study of Daniels et al. included only Thai samples . Discrepancy was also observed with the MalariaGEN database. Genome annotation of P. falciparum is available at PlasmoDB. Bioanalysis revealed that some of the selected SNPs were present in genes located in subtelomeric regions and encoded surface antigens (Additional file 6). These regions are known to be highly variable and to encode surface antigens. Variation in these regions might not reflect population evolution, but more parasite-host interactions such as antigenic variation.
11-SNPs barcode successfully identifies parasite subpopulations
The 11-SNPs barcode analysis at a country-wide scale confirmed that P. falciparum population is fragmented into subpopulations. Evidences were given both by individual SNPs and by global barcode analysis. The present study covers all regions where P. falciparum is endemic in Cambodia. The uneven distribution of most alleles confirmed the presence of subpopulations with restricted geographic distribution, leading us to define nine groups. Isolates from clustering groups G1, G3 and G7 were mostly located in western Cambodia. They were associated with the C580Y k13 mutant allele and correspond to the KH2 and KH3 subpopulations described earlier [6, 8]. These three groups might have restricted geographic origin as barcode allele frequencies from health centres (Fig. 2) and clustering groups (Fig. 4) were similar (Additional file 11). Subpopulation in these localities have been shown to emerge recently and correlates with artemisinin resistance specific to C580Y allele. It should be interesting to compare the barcodes in the two subpopulations (WKH-F01 and WKH-F03) described recently in the same localities in western Cambodia  from parasites isolated later than the present study (2011–2013).
Among the three less significant groups defined by the barcodes, G2 and G4 could not be associated to any of the specific subpopulations described earlier. The reason for G2 could be the origin of samples from the area which was not covered by genomic analysis. In fact, high FST value was observed in Chhouk suggesting possible emergence of subpopulation in southern Cambodia. Only five barcodes from these two groups were matching with the genotypes of defined subpopulation origin, one from KH4 and 4 from the admixed subpopulation KHA. The group G8 was associated with northern Cambodia and most of the samples were carrying the R539T k13 allele. Allele frequencies of this group were very close to that of the Trapaing Prasat HC, as illustrated by the Weblogos (Additional file 11). The high FST value of northern localities is in agreement with the hypothesis of gene flow associated with R539T mutation from the north. The prevalence of R539T k13 allele associated with increased ring stage survival and delayed parasite clearance rates near eastern Thailand and northern Cambodia border has been shown in recent studies [17, 18].
The 11-SNPs barcode questions the origin of subpopulations in Cambodia. Subpopulations are expected to emerge at different places and at different times over the country. Introduction of ACT is clearly associated with emergence of western parasite subpopulations. The origin of other subpopulations is not known. Barcode analysis shows that the genetic drift induced by the emergence of subpopulation disappears rapidly over time, most likely through the presence of admixed populations. Unfortunately, the present 11-SNPs barcode seems less relevant for the characterization of populations with high heterogeneity such as core population KH1 and admixed population KHA.
Relationship between subpopulations and drug susceptibilities
Groups G1, G3 and G7 were associated with resistance to artemisinin. Resistant parasites in these groups were carrying the C580Y allele only (Additional file 10). The diffusion of the C580Y allele in 2010–2011 over Cambodia was described previously . The present study provides evidence that the C580Y allele can be found in all groups. In the group G8, though the C580Y allele is present, most of the samples are associated to the R539T resistant allele. Three groups contains more than one k13 allele: G4 (N458Y, 1; R539T, 2; C580Y, 8), G5 (Y493H, 1; P553L, 1; R539T, 1; C580Y, 4), G6 (I543T, 1; V568G, 1; C580Y, 6) and G8 (R539T, 6; C580Y, 4). The R539T allele was strongly associated to a subpopulation originating from northern Cambodia and represented by G8 group. The two groups G4 and G8 were associated to high mefloquine IC50 values (Additional file 13). Interestingly, G8 includes highest number of samples (21/28) with associated to high mefloquine IC50 values (IC50 > 30 nM). Parasites were genetically close according to their barcode. Allele frequency in G8 was close from those found in Trapaing Prasat samples, suggesting that it is the region of origin of these parasites. This result is in agreement with the study by Chaorattanakawee et al., which shows the increase in occurrence of R539T allele from 2009 to 2013 and association with increased mefloquine IC50 value for R539T allele (ex vivo drug susceptibility test) . Despite the observed association between drug resistance (artemisinin and mefloquine) and subpopulations, the present study provides no evidence that drug pressure is responsible for emergence of subpopulations in western and northern Cambodia.
Genetic exchange between parasite subpopulations
Clustering approach provided evidence that subpopulations have emerged in different parts of the country. They might have emerged from the ancestral KH1 population described by Miotto et al. . Significance of geographical centroids shows that the most recently emerged subpopulations could be well localized. The decrease of the significance could be related to the diffusion of alleles, which in that case follows the west to east major axis (Fig. 4). Nevertheless, other gene flow axis might also be present over Cambodia. This was confirmed by high FST values at the periphery of the country (Fig. 3). Regions with high FST were strongly related to forest areas which are mostly distributed at the border of Cambodia. Parasite subpopulations might have encountered independent drift of mutation and selection. Parasites moving out of their region of origin will progressively mix their genetic background with other parasites. This hypothesis is supported by the presence of G2, G4 and G8 groups containing barcodes associated to admixed population KHA. Genetic exchange between subpopulations takes place by mating. It might be supported by human socio-economical migrations. The presence of this ongoing gene flow might have supported the eastward dispersal of artemisinin resistance k13 alleles after introducing ACT in the country. Currently, environmental factors such as deforestation, development of communication axes and global welfare are changing rapidly. It will be interesting to develop a specific barcode analysis to follow the evolution of these subpopulations in this new socio-economical context.
FA, DM and EC design the study. SK, SS, SL, and DM initiated and coordinated sample collection. PC performed in vitro susceptibility to anti-malarial drugs assays. NK design probes for genotyping. NK, DD, CK, LM, MT and CB performed genotyping. PR and EC develop the algorithm for genotype construction. AD, NK, CR and EC contribute to data analysis and population study. RF and OMP provide critical comments and helpful discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We would sincerely like to acknowledge Céline Barnadas who gave us valuable advices to optimize the LDR-FMA, the technical staff of the National Centre for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, and of the laboratory of Malaria Molecular Epidemiology at the Institut Pasteur in Cambodia for their excellent work.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The research project was approved by Cambodian Ethical Committee, Ministry of Health, and supported by the Global Fund project, round 6 (Grant CAM-607-G10 M-CNM3). Nimol KHIM was funded by the Institut Pasteur in Cambodia and by the Bourse du Gouvernement Français during her PhD. training at the Institut de Biologie Computationnelle, Montpellier. Ankit DWIVEDI was funded by Erasmus Mundus Action 2: Svaagata.eu project during his PhD. training at the Institut de Biologie Computationnelle and Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier. Emmanuel CORNILLOT was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche « Investissements d’avenir/Bioinformatique » : ANR-11-BINF-0002 « Institut de Biologie Computationnelle » .
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Eyles DE, Hoo CC, Warren M, Sandosham AA. Plasmodium falciparum resistant to chloroquine in Cambodia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1963;12:840–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harinasuta T, Suntharasamai P, Viravan C. Chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria in Thailand. Lancet. 1965;2:657–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peters W. Chemotherapy and drug resistance in malaria. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 1987.Google Scholar
- Wongsrichanalai C, Pickard AL, Wernsdorfer WH, Meshnick SR. Epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:209–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mita T, Tanabe K, Kita K. Spread and evolution of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance. Parasitol Int. 2009;58:201–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois AC, Khim N, et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2014;505:50–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, Smith BL, Socheat D, Fukuda MM, et al. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2619–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miotto O, Almagro-Garcia J, Manske M, Macinnis B, Campino S, Rockett KA, et al. Multiple populations of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Cambodia. Nat Genet. 2013;45:648–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miotto O, Amato R, Ashley EA, MacInnis B, Almagro-Garcia J, Amaratunga C, et al. Genetic architecture of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Genet. 2015;47:226–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Escalante AA, Ferreira MU, Vinetz JM, Volkman SK, Cui L, Gamboa D, et al. Malaria molecular epidemiology: lessons from the International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research Network. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:79–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Daniels R, Volkman SK, Milner DA, Mahesh N, Neafsey DE, Park DJ, et al. A general SNP-based molecular barcode for Plasmodium falciparum identification and tracking. Malar J. 2008;7:223.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- McNamara DT, Kasehagen LJ, Grimberg BT, Cole-Tobian J, Collins WE, Zimmerman PA. Diagnosing infection levels of four human malaria parasite species by a polymerase chain reaction/ligase detection reaction fluorescent microsphere-based assay. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:413–21.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bruse S, Moreau M, Azaro M, Zimmerman R, Brzustowicz L. Improvements to bead-based oligonucleotide ligation SNP genotyping assays. Biotechniques. 2008;45:559–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Software R. The R Project for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004;14:1188–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Leang R, Barrette A, Bouth DM, Menard D, Abdur R, Duong S, et al. Efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in Cambodia, 2008 to 2010. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:818–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Talundzic E, Okoth SA, Congpuong K, Plucinski MM, Morton L, Goldman IF, et al. Selection and spread of artemisinin-resistant alleles in Thailand prior to the global artemisinin resistance containment campaign. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004789.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ye R, Hu D, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Sun X, Wang J, et al. Distinctive origin of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum on the China-Myanmar border. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chaorattanakawee S, Saunders DL, Sea D, Chanarat N, Yingyuen K, Sundrakes S, et al. Ex vivo drug susceptibility testing and molecular profiling of clinical Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Cambodia from 2008 to 2013 suggest emerging piperaquine resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:4631–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar