Skip to content

Advertisement

Malaria Journal

Research
Open Access

Avidity of anti-malarial antibodies inversely related to transmission intensity at three sites in Uganda

  • Isaac Ssewanyana1, 4Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Emmanuel Arinaitwe1, 4,
  • Joaniter I. Nankabirwa1, 3,
  • Adoke Yeka1, 3,
  • Richard Sullivan2,
  • Moses R. Kamya1, 3,
  • Philip J. Rosenthal2,
  • Grant Dorsey2,
  • Harriet Mayanja-Kizza3,
  • Chris Drakeley4,
  • Bryan Greenhouse2 and
  • Kevin K. A. Tetteh4
Malaria Journal201716:67

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1721-3

©  The Author(s) 2017

Received: 14 October 2016

Accepted: 3 February 2017

Published: 10 February 2017

Abstract

Background

People living in malaria endemic areas acquire protection from severe malaria quickly, but protection from clinical disease and control of parasitaemia is acquired only after many years of repeated infections. Antibodies play a central role in protection from clinical disease; however, protective antibodies are slow to develop. This study sought to investigate the influence of Plasmodium falciparum exposure on the acquisition of high-avidity antibodies to P. falciparum antigens, which may be associated with protection.

Methods

Cross-sectional surveys were performed in children and adults at three sites in Uganda with varied P. falciparum transmission intensity (entomological inoculation rates; 3.8, 26.6, and 125 infectious bites per person per year). Sandwich ELISA was used to measure antibody responses to two P. falciparum merozoite surface antigens: merozoite surface protein 1-19 (MSP1-19) and apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1). In individuals with detectable antibody levels, guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) was added to measure the relative avidity of antibody responses by ELISA.

Results

Within a site, there were no significant differences in median antibody levels between the three age groups. Between sites, median antibody levels were generally higher in the higher transmission sites, with differences more apparent for AMA-1 and in ≥5 year group. Similarly, median avidity index (proportion of high avidity antibodies) showed no significant increase with increasing age but was significantly lower at sites of higher transmission amongst participants ≥5 years of age. Using 5 M GuHCl, the median avidity indices in the ≥5 year group at the highest and lowest transmission sites were 19.9 and 26.8, respectively (p = 0.0002) for MSP1-19 and 12.2 and 17.2 (p = 0.0007) for AMA1.

Conclusion

Avidity to two different P. falciparum antigens was lower in areas of high transmission intensity compared to areas with lower transmission. Appreciation of the mechanisms behind these findings as well as their clinical consequences will require additional investigation, ideally utilizing longitudinal data and investigation of a broader array of responses.

Keywords

Plasmodium falciparum MalariaAntibodyAvidityTransmissionUganda

Background

Malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum is a major global public health challenge, accounting for an estimated 214 million clinical cases and 438,000 deaths in 2015 [1]. People living in endemic areas acquire protection from the most severe manifestations of malaria relatively quickly, but protection from uncomplicated clinical disease and control of parasitaemia takes longer and is often acquired only after many years of repeated infections [2]. Moreover, sterile immunity to P. falciparum is rarely if ever achieved. Passive transfer of immunoglobulin from clinically immune donors to non-immune individuals with P. falciparum infection alleviated clinical symptoms and reduced the levels of blood stage parasites, indicating that antibodies play a central role in clinical immunity to malaria [3, 4]. However, numerous studies have measured antibody levels to various P. falciparum antigens with conflicting results regarding correlates of protection [5–10]. The qualities of protective antibodies and precise mechanisms by which they mediate protection are not fully understood.

Antibody properties including breadth of response, isotype composition, and avidity appear to play an important role in protective immunity [11–13]. Antibody avidity reflects the overall strength of interaction between the antibody and antigen complex and correlates with protection in naturally acquired and vaccine induced immunity to viral and bacterial pathogens [14–17]. In P. falciparum infection, avidity to whole schizont extract, as well as to a number of specific antigens, has been shown to correlate with protection [18–21]. However, acquisition of high antibody avidity to P. falciparum antigens with increasing age and varied P. falciparum exposure intensity is poorly understood.

In general, repeated exposure to an antigen results in germinal centre reactions which lead to affinity maturation and increases in antibody avidity [22–24]. However, there is also evidence to suggest that P. falciparum infection directly interferes with B cell function [2, 8, 25] and disrupts germinal centre architecture [26, 27], potentially interfering with affinity maturation [ [26, 27]. One study performed in a setting of unstable malaria transmission showed evidence of increased antibody avidity following resolution of a clinical malaria episode [18]. In contrast, two studies of children living in endemic areas failed to observe an increase in avidity to a number of P. falciparum antigens with increasing exposure [28, 29]. Overall, it is unclear if repeated exposure to P. falciparum leads to increased avidity of antibodies directed against plasmodium antigens.

To determine the influence of P. falciparum exposure on the natural acquisition of high-antibody avidity, avidity indices to two P. falciparum merozoite surface antigens were measured in individuals across a wide range of ages from cross-sectional surveys performed in three sites in Uganda with varying transmission intensity. Antibody avidity indices were then compared between ages and sites to determine whether there were differences in antibody avidity associated with age and P. falciparum exposure intensity.

Methods

Study sites and cross-sectional surveys

This study took place in three sub-counties in Uganda with varied P. falciparum transmission intensity. Walukuba, a peri-urban area near Lake Victoria, had relatively low transmission intensity, with an entomological inoculation rate (EIR) estimated at 3.8 infectious bites per person per year (IBPPY) [30]. Kihihi, a rural area in the south-western part of Uganda, had higher transmission, with an estimated EIR of 26.6 IBPPY. Nagongera, a rural area in the south-eastern part of the country, had the highest transmission, with an estimated EIR of 125 IBPPY. Malaria transmission at all three sites was perennial. Malaria control interventions in all three districts included use of long lasting insecticide treated nets (LLIN), malaria case management with artemisinin based therapies, and intermittent presumptive treatment during pregnancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine.

Cross-sectional surveys were conducted between January and June 2012 at all three sites [31]. Survey staff recruited members from 200 households randomly selected from a population-based census. Dried blood spots (DBS) from finger-prick samples were obtained from all children under 15 years of age and from a random selection of age stratified adults in the following categories: 15–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, and >55 years. The cross-sectional survey resulted in recruitment of 2737 participants of which 2227 had ELISA results. For this study, 581 and 1029 participants who had reactive antibodies with normalized OD >0.5 were analysed for avidity to MSP-1 and AMA-1 respectively. This allowed inclusion of participants who might have had a more recent antibody boost for a more direct comparison across sites.

Ethical approval and informed consent

Ethical approval was obtained from the Makerere University School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (REC REF 2011–203), Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS 1074), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee (Reference 6012), and the University of California, San Francisco Committee on Human Research (Reference 027911). Written informed consent was obtained from the parents/guardians on behalf of the children enrolled in the study and from all participants above 18 years of age. Assent was obtained from all children 8–17 years.

Elution of antibodies from dried blood spots (DBS)

DBS were collected on Whatman 3MM filter paper and stored at −20 °C. For this study, a 3 mm diameter punch of DBS was hydrated in 200 µl of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.005% Tween 20 and 0.01% sodium azide. The samples were left on a plate shaker overnight at room temperature before storage at 4 °C. The excised spot was estimated to contain approximately 2 µl plasma, resulting in a serum dilution factor of 1:200 [32].

Modified ELISA to measure the avidity index

Antibodies to MSP1-19 (Wellcome strain) [33] and AMA-1 (FVO strain) [34] were measured via a standard sandwich ELISA method [28, 31]. In brief, Immulon-4 HBX microtitre plates (Thermo Labsystems, Basingstoke, UK) were coated overnight at 4 °C with 0.5 mg/ml of antigen in coating buffer (0.1 M sodium carbonate/bicarbonate, pH 9.6), and then washed three times with wash buffer; PBS, 0.05% Tween-20. Plates were blocked for 3 h at room temperature with 200 µl/well PBS, 0.05% Tween-20, 1% skimmed dried milk and then washed three times. For each sample, plasma was diluted to a final concentration of 1:1000 for MSP1-19 and 1:2000 for AMA1, with 50 μl of diluted plasma added per well. Plates were incubated overnight at 4 °C and washed six times. HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-human IgG (Dako Ltd, High Wycombe, UK) was diluted 1:5000 in blocking buffer and 50 μl was added per well. Plates were incubated for 3 h at room temperature, then washed six times and developed with 100 µl/well of o-phenylenediamine (OPD)–H2O2. The reaction was stopped after 15 min with 25 μl 2 M sulphuric acid. ODs were measured at 492 nm using a VERSAmax plate reader, with Softmax software (Molecular Devices, USA).

To evaluate antibody avidity, the sandwich ELISA assay described above was modified to include an antibody disassociation step prior to addition of HRP-conjugated secondary antibody [29, 35, 36]. Briefly, diluted plasma samples were incubated on the plates overnight at 4 °C, antibody avidity was measured by treating duplicate wells with 2 or 5 M guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) for 10 min and then washing six times. PBS was used for the control wells to measure the total antibody binding. Test samples with and without GuHCl were run on the same plate to minimize variability. The avidity index (AI) was defined as the proportion of antibodies binding after treatment with GuHCl for each dilution (Avidity index = [OD following GuHCl treatment/OD without GuHCl treatment] × 100).

In order to overcome the limitations of avidity measurement by ELISA (poor resolution at the lower OD), and to select for participants with a relatively recent antibody boost across the three sites, only samples with titers above a normalized OD (adjusted OD based on a positive control to correct for inter-plate variations) of 0.5 were included in the assessment of the avidity index. In each plate, hyper-immune sera was included at a dilution 1:3200 as a positive control.

Data analysis

Participants were stratified into age groups 1–4, 5–15 and >15 years. Non-parametric comparison of medians across groups within a site and across sites for the different age groups was performed using the Mann–Whitney test. Correlations were performed using the Pearson test. Graphs were plotted using Graphpad PRISM version 5 (Graphpad Software, USA).

Results

Antibody levels in three sites in Uganda

Antibody levels and avidity index (AI) were measured in samples from cross sectional surveys conducted at three sites in Uganda. Consistent with published data on antibody prevalence [31], the proportion of all cross-sectional survey samples included in this study (those with a normalized OD ≥ 0.5) increased with transmission intensity for AMA-1 (29.1, 43.6, and 67.7% for Walukuba, Kihihi and Nagongera, respectively) but not MSP1-19 (14.6, 34.5, and 27.3% for Walukuba, Kihihi and Nagongera, respectively). Amongst included samples, there were no significant differences in median antibody levels between the three age groups (1–4, 5–15 and >15 years) for either MSP1-19 or AMA-1 within each of the three sites. However, median antibody levels were generally higher in the higher transmission sites, with differences more apparent for AMA-1 and in older individuals (Table 1).
Table 1

Antibody responses to MSP1-19 and AMA-1

Antigen

Age group (years)

Site

No of participants

Median age (IQR)

Median OD (IQR)

p value

Walukuba vs Kihihi

Walukuba vs Nagongera

Kihihi vs Nagongera

MSP1-19

1–4

Walukuba

12

3 (2–4)

0.71 (0.60–1.10)

0.08

0.041

0.44

Kihihi

18

3 (1–4)

0.90 (0.70–1.17)

Nagongera

24

1 (1–3)

1.00 (0.73–1.29)

5–15

Walukuba

16

12 (6–13)

0.80 (0.65–1.25)

0.5

0.4

0.8

Kihihi

76

12 (8–13)

0.89 (0.63–1.12)

Nagongera

74

11 (7–13)

0.87 (0.63–1.17)

>15

Walukuba

64

28 (20–40)

0.82 (0.61–1.1)

0.029

0.011

0.4

Kihihi

181

35 (25–48)

0.97 (0.70–1.27)

Nagongera

116

39 (25–55)

1.00 (0.67–1.30)

Total

  

581

AMA-1

1–4

Walukuba

18

2 (1–3)

0.86 (0.59–1.10)

0.95

0.18

0.19

Kihihi

21

3 (2–4)

0.79 (0.65–1.11)

Nagongera

63

3 (2–4)

0.92 (0.67–1.2)

5–15

Walukuba

76

9 (6–12)

0.92 (0.67–1.07)

0.005

0.0001

0.6

Kihihi

125

11 (8–13)

1.1 (0.80–1.15)

Nagongera

251

9 (7–12)

1.1 (0.85–1.2)

>15

Walukuba

89

27 (22–32)

0.72 (0.61–0.88)

0.0001

0.0007

0.62

Kihihi

197

34 (22–47)

0.85 (0.68–1.1)

Nagongera

189

34 (22–50)

0.87 (0.65–1.1)

Total

  

1029

Statistically significant values (p < 0.05) are in italics

Relationship between age and antibody avidity

Median avidity index to MSP1-19 at 2 and 5 M GuHCl was not significantly different between age groups at all three sites. Similarly, median avidity index to AMA-1 at 2 and 5 M GuHCl showed no difference between age groups at all three sites, with the exception of 1–4 versus 5–15 year olds in Walukuba (73.6 versus 85.1 p = 0.04) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Avidity index to MSP1-19 and AMA-1 across age groups within the three sites, at the two GuHCl concentrations (2 and 5 M). The bars represent the median and interquartile range. *p < 0.05

Relationship between malaria transmission and antibody avidity

In contrast to the trends observed in antibody levels, the avidity index to MSP1-19 was significantly lower in the highest malaria transmission site of Nagongera than Kihihi and Walukuba in those over five, at both GuHCl concentrations (2 and 5 M) (Fig. 2). There were no significant differences in avidity index between sites in children under five. Responses to AMA-1 showed a similar pattern, with avidity index lower in Nagongera and Kihihi than Walukuba in those at least 5 years old at 5 M. There was no evidence of correlation between the avidity index to MSP1-19 and AMA-1 at either GuHCl concentration (r2 < 0.002, p > 0.5 at 2 and 5 M GuHCl, for all three sites). Overall, these findings suggest an inverse relationship between avidity index and both transmission intensity and antibody response to MSP1-19 and AMA-1 across sites for those above 5 years.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Avidity index to MSP1-19 and AMA-1 across transmission sites within the three age groups, at the two GuHCl concentrations (2 and 5 M). The bars represent the median and interquartile range. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001

Discussion

This study sought to determine the influence of P. falciparum exposure on natural acquisition of high avidity antibodies. Avidity was measured to MSP1-19 and AMA-1 antigens in 581 and 1029 individuals respectively encompassing a wide range of ages, from three sites in Uganda with transmission intensities ranging from moderate to extremely high. These results demonstrated that age had a minimal effect on antibody avidity, consistent with previous studies using similar methods of evaluation, which observed slight or inconsistent age-related differences in avidity to MSP1-19 and AMA-1 [28, 29]. Importantly, despite higher antibody levels, avidity to both antigens was significantly lower at the site of highest P. falciparum transmission intensity in children ≥5 years and adults. These results suggest that affinity maturation to P. falciparum antigens may be compromised in the setting of very high, perennial exposure to this parasite.

There are at least two potential explanations for this study’s main findings, which are neither exhaustive nor mutually exclusive: (1) near constant exposure to antigen may impair maturation/persistence of avid antibodies via a number of potential mechanisms; and (2) recent infection may result in addition of low avid antibodies to the circulation, reducing the proportion which have high avidity.

Affinity maturation is acquired through somatic hypermutation during germinal centre reactions, with B cell affinity to antigen driving selection that results in the production of higher affinity antibodies [37, 38]. Classical understanding of B cell biology would suggest that repeated exposure would be expected to drive several rounds of germinal centre reactions, ultimately resulting in higher antibody affinities to the pathogen, hence higher antibody avidity. In contrast, the results showed a lower proportion of avid antibodies in participants living in the highest P. falciparum transmission sites, where exposure to antigen is most frequent. Animal studies suggest that germinal centre development is temporally ordered, with short lived plasma cells (SLPC) emerging from germinal centres initially, followed by memory B cells (MBC) and then, weeks to months later, long lived plasma cells (LLPC) that have undergone extensive affinity maturation [37, 39]. Disturbance to this process resulting from frequent or chronic infections may compromise the ultimate development of high affinity MBC and LLPC. For example, there is evidence that frequent acute malaria interferes with follicular helper T cell differentiation and germinal centre architecture in the spleen [27, 40–42]. Another hypothesis suggests that P. falciparum infection is associated with dysfunction of the B cell compartment, including accumulation of atypical memory B cells [43], which could theoretically result in the inefficient acquisition and maintenance of antibody mediated immunity to malaria [44]. It is also possible that frequent exposure to a large number of antigen clones may impair affinity maturation to any one of the clones and it is likely that the highest transmission site experience a higher complexity of infection.

In the presence of low antigen levels, affinity matured plasma cells that secrete high affinity antibodies should be favored over lower affinity plasma cells and circulating antibodies for survival. These affinity matured plasma cells would therefore maintain the blood antibody levels. However, in the presence of frequent re-infection, a relatively large antigen load may be more likely to promote survival of poorly affinity-matured plasma cells, including T cell-independent or extra-follicular B cell reactions. Furthermore, acute P. falciparum infection is associated with non-specific, polyclonal B cell activation that may result in the expansion of low avidity, short lived plasma cells [25]. These factors may reduce the proportion but not necessarily the titers of high avidity antibodies. In contrast, in the absence of recent infection the antibody pool is predominantly comprised of high avidity antibodies generated by LLPC after the contraction of the SLPC. This may explain why Ugandans in lower transmission areas, who on average had a longer duration of time since their last infection, had higher proportions of highly avid antibodies. Based on this argument, most likely the difference in avidity index between the low and high transmission sites should have been more pronounced if the method allowed to examine samples below with OD <0.5.

The impact of the differences in avidity index observed in this study on acquisition of clinical or anti-parasite immunity is not known. While antibody avidity is theoretically important in the function of an antibody response [45], there are few available empiric data to support the relationship between avidity and immunity in malaria. Reddy et al. found that individuals with higher antibody avidity to P. falciparum antigens were less likely to experience malaria during follow-up [21, 46]. In an RTS,S malaria vaccine trial, investigators did not find an association between antibody avidity to circumsporozoite protein and protection after the last dose of vaccination among children, but they did show that the change in avidity between second and third vaccination was associated with a 54% reduced risk of acquiring malaria [47, 48]. The relationship between avidity measurements and clinical immunity is also complex, with numerous factors other than avidity at play. High antibody titres may compensate for low avidity; therefore, relatively low avidity in the presence of high antibody levels may not have a negative consequence on naturally acquired immunity. Clinical data from this study show that acquired immunity clearly develops in children in Nagongera as well as the other sites, the study site with highest P. falciparum transmission, based on reductions in the incidence of disease with age [49]. However it is not clear whether acquired immunity would develop and be maintained more effectively by decreasing the nearly continuous exposure to blood stage parasites at the site, e.g. via chemoprevention or by reducing transmission using vector control [50].

The cross-sectional nature of this study limited the ability to investigate the mechanisms behind the acquisition of antibody avidity. Furthermore, this study only investigated responses to two of many P. falciparum proteins, and it is not yet well established which combinations of responses are most relevant for acquisition of immunity. In addition, while providing an overall estimate of the proportion of the polyclonal antibody pool which is highly avid, the ELISA-based methods used in this study were not able to measure avidity in participants with OD <0.5 or further dissect binding characteristics of the antibodies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study showed that avidity to two different P. falciparum antigens was lower in areas of high versus low transmission intensity. The mechanisms behind these findings as well as their clinical consequences, if any, are not yet clear. A more detailed investigation, ideally linked to longitudinal investigation of P. falciparum exposure as well as a more comprehensive analysis of the B cell and antibody response, will be valuable in helping to further illuminate these findings.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

EA, JN, AY, MRK, PJR, GD prepared and performed cross-sectional surveys. IS, CD, KKAT, BG, HMK conceived avidity experiment, IS performed experiments. IS, BG, RS, CD, KKAT, EA analysed data. IS, BG, KKAT, CD, JN wrote manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank the study team and the Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration (IDRC) for administrative and technical support. We are grateful to the individuals who participated in this study and their families.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data

The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Makerere University School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (REC REF 2011–203), Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS 1074), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee (Reference 6012), and the University of California, San Francisco Committee on Human Research (Reference 027911).

Funding

National Institutes of Health as part of the East African International Centers of Excellence in Malaria Research (ICMER) program (U19AI089674). Training in malaria research in Uganda (D43TW7375).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
(2)
Department of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, USA
(3)
Department of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
(4)
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

References

  1. WHO. World malaria report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2015/report/en/. Accessed 12 Mar 2016.
  2. Langhorne J, Ndungu FM, Sponaas AM, Marsh K. Immunity to malaria: more questions than answers. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(7):725–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen S, McGregor IA, Carrington S. Gamma-globulin and acquired immunity to human malaria. Nature. 1961;192:733–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McGregor IA, Carrington S, Cohen S. Treatment of East African P. falciparum malaria with West African human γ-globulin. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1963;57:170–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Druilhe P, Khusmith S. Epidemiological correlation between levels of antibodies promoting merozoite phagocytosis of Plasmodium falciparum and malaria-immune status. Infect Immun. 1987;55:888–91.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. John CC, Moormann AM, Pregibon DC, Sumba PO, McHugh MM, Narum DL, et al. Correlation of high levels of antibodies to multiple pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum antigens and protection from infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:222–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fowkes FJI, Richards JS, Simpson JA, Beeson JG. The relationship between anti-merozoite antibodies and incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000218.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Portugal S, Pierce SK, Crompton PD. Young lives lost as B cells falter: what we are learning about antibody responses in malaria. J Immunol. 2013;190:3039–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Tetteh KK, Osier FH, Salanti A, Kamuyu G, Drought L, Failly M, et al. Analysis of antibodies to newly described Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens supports MSPDBL2 as a predicted target of naturally acquired immunity. Infect Immun. 2013;81:3835–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Crompton PD, Kayala MA, Traore B, Kayentao K, Ongoiba A, Weiss GE, et al. A prospective analysis of the Ab response to Plasmodium falciparum before and after a malaria season by protein microarray. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:6958–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Nogaro SI, Hafalla JC, Walther B, Remarque EJ, Tetteh KK, Conway DJ, et al. The breadth, but not the magnitude, of circulating memory B cell responses to P. falciparum increases with age/exposure in an area of low transmission. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25582.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Groux H, Gysin J. Opsonization as an effector mechanism in human protection against asexual blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum: functional role of IgG subclasses. Res Immunol. 1990;141:529–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill DL, Eriksson EM, Li Wai Suen CS, Chiu CY, Ryg-Cornejo V, Robinson LJ, et al. Opsonising antibodies to P. falciparum merozoites associated with immunity to clinical malaria. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e74627.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Schlesinger Y, Granoff DM. Avidity and bactericidal activity of antibody elicited by different Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines. JAMA. 1992;267:1489–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldblatt D, Vaz AR, Miller E. Antibody avidity as a surrogate marker of successful priming by Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines following infant immunization. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:1112–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bachmann MF, Kalinke U, Althage A, Freer G, Burkhart C, Roost H, et al. The role of antibody concentration and avidity in antiviral protection. Science. 1997;276:2024–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Maynard JA, Maassen CB, Leppla SH, Brasky K, Patterson JL, Iverson BL, et al. Protection against anthrax toxin by recombinant antibody fragments correlates with antigen affinity. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:597–601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferreira MU, Kimura EAS, de Souza JM, Katzin AM. The isotype composition and avidity of naturally acquired anti-Plasmodium falciparum antibodies: differential patterns in clinically immune Africans and Amazonian patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996;55:315–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Leoratti FM, Durlacher RR, Lacerda MV, Alecrim MG, Ferreira AW, Sanchez MC, et al. Pattern of humoral immune response to Plasmodium falciparum blood stages in individuals presenting different clinical expressions of malaria. Malar J. 2008;7:186.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Tutterrow YL, Salanti A, Avril M, Smith JD, Pagano IS, Ako S, et al. High avidity antibodies to full-length VAR2CSA correlate with absence of placental malaria. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40049.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Reddy SB, Anders RF, Beeson JG, Färnert A, Kironde F, Berenzon SK, et al. High affinity antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens are associated with protection from malaria. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32242.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. MacLennan ICM. Germinal centers. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:117–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Y-J, Arpin C. Germinal center development. Immunol Rev. 1997;156:111–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gatto D, Brink R. The germinal center reaction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:898–909.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Donati D, Mok B, Chêne A, Xu H, Thangarajh M, Glas R, et al. Increased B cell survival and preferential activation of the memory compartment by a malaria polyclonal B cell activator. J Immunol. 2006;177:3035–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Carvalho LJ, Ferreira-da-Cruz MF, Daniel-Ribeiro CT, Pelajo-Machado M, Lenzi HL. Germinal center architecture disturbance during Plasmodium berghei ANKA infection in CBA mice. Malar J. 2007;6:59.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Alves FA, Pelajo-Machado M, Totino PR, Souza MT, Gonçalves EC, Schneider MP, et al. Splenic architecture disruption and parasite-induced splenocyte activation and anergy in Plasmodium falciparum-infected Saimiri sciureus monkeys. Malar J. 2015;14:128.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Akpogheneta OJ, Dunyo S, Pinder M, Conway DJ. Boosting antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens in children with highly seasonal exposure to infection. Parasite Immunol. 2010;32:296–304.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ibison F, Olotu A, Muema DM, Mwacharo J, Ohuma E, Kimani D, et al. Lack of avidity maturation of merozoite antigen-specific antibodies with increasing exposure to Plasmodium falciparum amongst children and adults exposed to endemic malaria in Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e52939.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kilama M, Smith DL, Hutchinson R, Kigozi R, Yeka A, Lavoy G, et al. Estimating the annual entomological inoculation rate for Plasmodium falciparum transmitted by Anopheles gambiae s.l. using three sampling methods in three sites in Uganda. Malar J. 2014;13:111.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Yeka A, Nankabirwa J, Mpimbaza A, Kigozi R, Arinaitwe E, Drakeley C, et al. Factors associated with malaria parasitemia, anemia and serological responses in a spectrum of epidemiological settings in Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0118901.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Corran PH, Cook J, Lynch C, Leendertse H, Manjurano A, Griffin J, et al. Dried blood spots as a source of anti-malarial antibodies for epidemiological studies. Malar J. 2008;7:195.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Burghaus PA, Holder AA. Expression of the 19-kilodalton carboxy-terminal fragment of the Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 in Escherichia coli as a correctly folded protein. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1994;64:165–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kocken CH, Withers-Martinez C, Dubbeld MA, van der Wel A, Hackett F, Valderrama A, et al. High-level expression of the malaria blood-stage vaccine candidate Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 and induction of antibodies that inhibit erythrocyte invasion. Infect Immun. 2002;70:4471–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Pour Abolghasem S, Bonyadi MR, Babaloo Z, Porhasan A, Nagili B, Gardashkhani OA, et al. IgG avidity test for the diagnosis of acute Toxoplasma gondii infection in early pregnancy. Iran J Immunol. 2011;8:251–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zakeri S, Babaeekhou L, Mehrizi AA, Abbasi M, Djadid ND. Antibody responses and avidity of naturally acquired anti-Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein (PvDBP) antibodies in individuals from an area with unstable malaria transmission. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84:944–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Shlomchik MJ, Weisel F. Germinal center selection and the development of memory B and plasma cells. Immunol Rev. 2012;247:52–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu Y-J, Joshua DE, Williams GT, Smith CA, Gordon J, MacLennan IC. Mechanism of antigen-driven selection in germinal centres. Nature. 1989;342:929–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Weisel FJ, Zuccarino-Catania GV, Chikina M, Shlomchik MJ. A temporal switch in the germinal center determines differential output of memory B and plasma cells. Immunity. 2016;44:116–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Cadman ET, Abdallah AY, Voisine C, Sponaas AM, Corran P, Lamb T, et al. Alterations of splenic architecture in malaria are induced independently of Toll-like receptors 2, 4, and 9 or MyD88 and may affect antibody affinity. Infect Immun. 2008;76:3924–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryg-Cornejo V, Ioannidis LJ, Ly A, Chiu CY, Tellier J, Hill DL, et al. Severe malaria infections impair germinal center responses by inhibiting T follicular helper cell differentiation. Cell Rep. 2016;14:68–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Obeng-Adjei N, Portugal S, Tran TM, Yazew TB, Skinner J, Li S, et al. Circulating Th1 cell-type Tfh cells that exhibit impaired B cell help are preferentially activated during acute malaria in children. Cell Rep. 2015;13:425–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Weiss GE, Crompton PD, Li S, Walsh LA, Moir S, Traore B, et al. Atypical memory B cells are greatly expanded in individuals living in a malaria-endemic area. J Immunol. 2009;183:2176–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Scholzen A, Sauerwein RW. How malaria modulates memory: activation and dysregulation of B cells in Plasmodium infection. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:252–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Cremers AJ, Lut J, Hermans PW, Meis JF, de Jonge MI, Ferwerda G. Avidity of antibodies against infecting pneumococcal serotypes increases with age and severity of disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21:904–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Reddy SB, Anders RF, Cross N, Mueller I, Senn N, Stanisic DI, et al. Differences in affinity of monoclonal and naturally acquired polyclonal antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:133.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Ajua A, Lell B, Agnandji ST, Asante KP, Owusu-Agyei S, Mwangoka G, et al. The effect of immunization schedule with the malaria vaccine candidate RTS, S/AS01E on protective efficacy and anti-circumsporozoite protein antibody avidity in African infants. Malar J. 2015;14:72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Olotu A, Clement F, Jongert E, Vekemans J, Njuguna P, Ndungu FM, et al. Avidity of anti-circumsporozoite antibodies following vaccination with RTS, S/AS01E in young children. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e115126.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Kamya MR, Arinaitwe E, Wanzira H, Katureebe A, Barusya C, Kigozi SP, et al. Malaria transmission, infection, and disease at three sites with varied transmission intensity in Uganda: implications for malaria control. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:903–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Jagannathan P, Bowen K, Nankya F, McIntyre TI, Auma A, Wamala S, et al. Effective antimalarial chemoprevention in childhood enhances the quality of CD4+ T cells and limits their production of immunoregulatory interleukin 10. J Infect Dis. 2016;214:329–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us