Open Access

Continuous determination of blood glucose in children admitted with malaria in a rural hospital in Mozambique

  • Lola Madrid1, 2,
  • Antonio Sitoe1,
  • Rosauro Varo1, 2,
  • Tacilta Nhampossa1,
  • Miguel Lanaspa1, 2,
  • Abel Nhama1,
  • Sozinho Acácio1,
  • Isolina Riaño3, 4,
  • Aina Casellas2 and
  • Quique Bassat1, 2, 5Email author
Malaria Journal201716:184

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1840-x

Received: 7 February 2017

Accepted: 26 April 2017

Published: 2 May 2017

Abstract

Background

Hypoglycaemia is a frequent complication among admitted children, particularly in malaria-endemic areas. This study aimed to estimate the occurrence of hypoglycaemia not only upon admission but throughout the first 72 h of hospitalization in children admitted with malaria.

Methods

A simple pilot study to continuously monitor glycaemia in children aged 0–10 years, admitted with malaria in a rural hospital was conducted in Southern Mozambique by inserting continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) in subcutaneous tissue of the abdominal area, producing glycaemia readings every 5 min.

Results

Glucose was continuously monitored during a mean of 48 h, in 74 children. Continuous measurements of blood glucose were available for 72/74 children (97.3%). Sixty-five of them were admitted with density-specific malaria diagnosis criteria (17 severe, 48 uncomplicated). Five children (7.7%) had hypoglycaemia (<54 mg/dL) on admission as detected by routine capillary determination. Analysing the data collected by the CGMs, hypoglycaemia episodes (<54 mg/dL) were detected in 10/65 (15.4%) of the children, of which 7 (10.8%) could be classified as severe (≤45 mg/dL). No risk factors were independently associated with the presence of at least one episode of hypoglycaemia (<54 mg/dL) during hospitalization. Only one death occurred among a normoglycaemic child. All episodes of hypoglycaemia detected by CGMs were subclinical episodes or not perceived by caregivers or clinical staff.

Conclusions

Hypoglycaemia beyond admission in children with malaria appears to be much more frequent than what had been previously described. The clinical relevance of these episodes of hypoglycaemia in the medium or long term remains to be determined.

Keywords

Hypoglycaemia Blood glucose Hyperglycaemia Continuous glucose monitor Malaria

Background

Hypoglycaemia is a common problem in paediatric emergency admissions in Africa, and is associated with a wide variety of disorders and diseases. In descriptive studies conducted in different countries of Africa, the prevalence of hypoglycaemia on admission ranged between 3.2 and 7.3% of the paediatric patients [16]. The plasmatic glycaemia threshold defining hypoglycaemia has been established by the World Health Organization (WHO) as <2.5 mmol/L (45 mg/dL) in an adequately-nourished child and <3 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) in a severely malnourished child [7], however, an increased risk of death has been associated to intermediate levels of low glycaemia [8] and the WHO recommends correction when blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L is detected. Most literature on childhood hypoglycaemia links the incidence of hypoglycaemia to specific conditions such as malaria, diarrhoea or malnutrition, and other life-threatening diseases including meningitis and sepsis as causes that contribute to its occurrence and outcome [14, 9, 10]. Hypoglycaemia can complicate many childhood diseases being a frequent albeit-treatable cause of death. It is also a factor of poor prognosis in admitted children [11].

In patients with malaria, decreased levels of glycaemia are common and secondary to the consumption of glucose by the Plasmodium parasite, hyperinsulinism caused by quinine (whenever used), and lack of adequate supplementation/oral intake in cases of severe malaria, especially in cerebral malaria [9, 10, 12, 13]. Its impact can be easily understood when assessing the mortality risk in patients with malaria. Indeed, mortality in severe malaria may increase from 8 to 13.4% in patients with normal blood glucose levels to 24–61.5% in the hypoglycaemic patients [8, 14, 15].

The studies conducted to date in children admitted with malaria performed their occasional glycaemia assessments using glucometers that need a finger prick each time the glucose level must be assessed, or relied on the analysis of venous blood samples. These methods only allow limited number of glycaemia assessments during the day. However the evolution of blood glucose is dynamic and hypoglycaemia may occur and be undetected in severely ill patients in the time lapse between two assessments, even after presenting normal blood glucose levels on admission.

To improve monitoring of blood glucose, continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), initially developed for a more timely control of adult and paediatric patients suffering from type 1 diabetes, [16, 17], have been recently introduced in paediatric intensive care, where they are showing a high degree of agreement with standard glucometers [1820].

Using the CGMs during the initial and most critical days of admission, could allow a better detection of hypoglycaemia episodes, and a comprehensive description of the dynamics and evolution of blood glucose. This would help establishing some preliminary risk factors for hypoglycaemia during the first days of illness, and help to detect those patients who could most benefit from additional supplementation and a more thorough control to improve prognosis during hospitalization.

A pilot study was conducted using CGMs to continuously assess blood glycaemia and aimed to determine the occurrence of hypoglycaemia episodes detected by these devices in children admitted with malaria, trying to identify risk factors associated with the development of intra-admission hypoglycaemic episodes.

Methods

Study site and population

This study was conducted in Manhiça, southern Mozambique. Manhiça is a semi-rural, savannah setting with a predominantly young population (19.1% are <5 years of age) [21]. Seasonality is marked, including a hot and rainy season (November–April), which coincides with the peak transmission season for malaria, and a dry and cooler season during the rest of the year.

The Manhiça Health Research Center (CISM) is a leading research centre in Africa with a well-developed clinical laboratory supporting the Manhiça District Hospital (MDH). The CISM runs a demographic surveillance system linked to a morbidity surveillance platform established at the Manhiça district Hospital and five additional primary health centres. A detailed description of CISM and the study area can be found elsewhere [21].

Study design

This prospective pilot study, conducted at the Manhiça District Hospital during a period of 9 months (1st September 2013 to 31st May 2014), recruited paediatric patients diagnosed with malaria in order to estimate the real occurrence of hypoglycaemia not only upon admission but also throughout the first 72 h of hospitalization. Children aged ≤10 years and fulfilling criteria for admission because of malaria diagnosis and living in the study area, were eligible to be included in the study if guardians agreed.

Hospital morbidity surveillance system

Hospital surveillance data are routinely collected for all children less than 15 years old visiting the outpatient clinics in the study area and those admitted to the MDH. Clinical data, including medical history, physical examination, routine laboratory basic investigations, ICD-10 based diagnosis, outcome and medication prescribed are collected on questionnaires on a round the clock basis and reviewed daily by senior medical staff before being entered in specific databases. On admission, a finger-prick blood sample is collected to determine PCV and blood glucose concentration. In order to quantify Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia, thick and thin blood films are prepared, processed and double read in the CISM laboratory according to standard procedures [22]. Slides are first read using the ‘Crosses system’ [23] to guide case management. Blood cultures are systematically performed for all children under 2 years of age and, in older children, in the presence of severe symptoms or according to the admitting clinician’s call.

HIV status information is not routinely collected. An HIV rapid diagnostic test or other molecular diagnostic methods for those <18 months of age is performed to those children with suspected HIV infection.

Definitions

Malaria is defined at MDH as a positive slide regardless of parasitaemia. In order to increase sensitivity and specificity of malaria case definition, we used an age cut-off for the level of parasitaemia based on previous malariometric indicators published for the Manhiça District [24, 25]. Thus, for children aged 12 months or more, a malaria case was defined as a positive blood slide with at least 2500 parasites/µL together with the documented presence of fever (≥37.5 °C, axillary) or a history of fever in the preceding 24 h. For infants (<12 months), no minimum parasitaemia was required. Severe malaria was defined following the WHO severe malaria latest guidelines [26]. Different thresholds were used to define blood glucose levels based on local and WHO guidelines [7] and the increased risk of mortality associated to intermediate levels of low glycaemia [4, 8, 15]: (1) severe hypoglycaemia was defined as glycaemia <45 mg/dL (2.5 mmol/L) in a well-nourished child or <54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) in a malnourished child, detected through the use of the continuous glucose monitoring device and/or a conventional portable bedside glucometers [7]. (2) Any hypoglycaemia implied glycaemia <54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) in well-nourished children [7]. (3) Normal-low range glycaemia, defined as glycaemia >54 and <90 mg/dL (3–5 mmol/L). (4) Subclinical hypoglycaemia was defined as any hypoglycaemia episode (as defined above) not accompanied with apparent clinical symptomatology, as confirmed by the patient or described by the observing clinician. Children were not continuously under medical observation and some episodes categorized as subclinical could be “non-witnessed” by clinical staff. (5) Hyperglycaemia was defined as a glucose value ≥198 mg/dL (11.0 mmol/L) [7]. Fasting was defined according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria [27]. Weight-for-height Z-scores (WHZ) were calculated for each child <5 years old and body mass index for age for children aged over 5 years, using the WHO growth chart [28]. The types of acute malnutrition were defined as follows: global acute malnutrition (<−2 z-score and/or oedema), severe acute malnutrition (<−3 z-scores and/or oedema) or non-existent (Z-score >−1). Dehydration was defined according to WHO guidelines [23].

Study procedures

Recruitment occurred during the working hours (07.00 am–07.00 pm) in the “Short stay admission” ward (Internamento de curta duração, ICD), where trained people were working. Recruitment was based on the first reading of the blood slide and all children with presence of parasites, fulfilling inclusion criteria when the devices were available were asked to participate in the study. A standardized study specific questionnaire was completed at the moment of recruitment. Demographic, nutritional and clinical data such as vital signs and anthropometry were also recorded. Medication, food and liquids other than water intakes, and events such as vomiting and diarrhoea were daily recorded during the time the CGM was inserted.

Laboratory procedures

An initial bedside capillary determination of glycaemia was performed on admission as routine management of admitted patients at MDH. Blood cultures were performed as part of the routine microbiological surveillance of admitted paediatric patients ongoing in MDH. A slide for malaria diagnosis was performed. No other samples were routinely obtained. HIV determination was offered to any study patient suspected of being immunocompromized.

Specific procedures for the continuous measurement of blood glucose

We aimed to use the CGMs (iPro2, Medtronic Iberica® SA, Madrid, Spain) for continuous glucose monitoring for 72 h starting upon admission. Children enrolled were connected to the Medtronic® devices after the signature of an informed consent (IC) by the child’s guardian. The CGMS is composed by the ENLITE sensor (glucose sensor) and the Mini Link transmitter (wireless transmitter), which does not offer real-time information.

The study personnel were trained in the use of the devices. Blood glucose levels in real time as well as calibration of CGM data were performed by taking a capillary blood sample (standard capillary assessment) every 6 h (4 times a day). Correction of glucose levels was performed when necessary following WHO guidelines with an intravenous bolus of 5 mL/kg of 10% dextrose which has been the standard of care at MDH(7).

Values recorded through the continuous monitoring software were downloaded via Care Link™ after sensor removal. Data obtained with the CGMs were compared with those obtained by capillary blood glucometer (CBG). We preferred a finger-prick method, as a comparison to CBG, rather than the more accurate laboratory method because the first is the most used in clinical practice at the MDH.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. Descriptive statistics were provided for all variables in the dataset, including frequency tabulations for binary/categorical variables and mean and standard deviation for normal distributed continuous variables and median and interquartile range (IQR) for non-normal continuous variables.

Firth logistic regression was used in order to address issues of separability, small sample sizes and bias of the parameter estimates. Only children fulfilling malaria criteria according to our study definition were included in the analysis. A multivariate logistic regression with penalized likelihood analysis was performed among children fulfilling the age and density-specific malaria diagnosis criteria to assess risk factors for having hypoglycaemia during the admission measured by the CGM, including those variables which showed an association with having hypoglycaemia in the univariate analysis, based on their size of effect (OR <0.5 or >1.5). Statistical significance was set at a p value of <0.05 and Confidence intervals (CI) at 95% level.

Paired glucose readings from the continuous glucose monitor (when available) and the standard capillary assessment (from calibrations and hypoglycaemia confirmations) were compared using a modified Bland–Altman analysis to measure agreement with repeated measures and a Clarke error grid analysis (CEG). The CEG identified five areas with different error in accuracy combined with the severity of clinical consequences:

Region A: values within 20% of the reference sensor.

Region B: values outside 20% of the reference sensor, but that would not lead to an inappropriate treatment.

Region C: values leading to an unnecessary treatment.

Region D: values indicating a potentially dangerous failure to detect hypo- or hyper-glycaemia.

Region E: values that would confuse treatment of hypoglycaemia for hyperglycaemia, and vice versa.

These graphs were produced using R [29].

Results

A total of 74 children with a positive blood slide in the first reading and admitted because of malaria at MDH were enrolled in the study from September 2013 to May 2014 (study profile in Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Study profile

Median (interquartile range, IQR) age on admission was 31.5 (5–84) months. Thirty-three children of 74 were male (44.6%) and 22/74 (29.7%) fulfilled the criteria for being considered severe malaria cases. Causes of admission of children recruited in the study are summarized in Table 1. Glycaemia results at admission were available for all children and continuous measurements of blood glucose were available for 72 of them (97.3%) as the CGMs failed to record glycaemia readings in two children. When double reading of parasitaemia was available, seven children were found not to meet density-specific malaria diagnosis criteria. These children were excluded from the analysis, which was therefore restricted to 65 children.
Table 1

Cause of admission of children participants of the study

Cause of admission

Uncomplicated malaria N = 52, n (%)

Severe malaria N = 22, n (%)

Prostration

9 (17.3)

NA

Vomiting

7 (13.5)

NA

Difficulty to drink

4 (7.7)

NA

Hyperparasitaemia (first read of blood slide)

32 (61.5)

NA

Cerebral malaria

NA

13

Severe anaemia

NA

8a

Hypoglycaemia (<2.5 mmol/L)

NA

3

aTwo of children admitted with severe anaemia had also cerebral malaria

The devices were well tolerated in all patients and no adverse skin reactions, infections, or bleeding in the insertion site occurred during the study period (Fig. 2). No patient inadvertently removed the device during the study. The average (standard deviation, SD) hospital stay was 2.6 days (0.2). One child with cerebral malaria died.
Fig. 2

Continuous glucose monitor inserted in a child participating in our study

Glucose levels at admission measured by capillary assessment

On admission, blood glycaemia was measured by capillary assessment. Five of sixty-five (7.7%) children presented hypoglycaemia <54 mg/dL and three of these episodes (4.6%) were categorized as severe (<45 mg/dL). Hyperglycaemia was detected in 1/65 (1.5%) patients.

Glucose levels measured by CGMs

Analysing the data collected by the CGM, hypoglycaemia (<54 mg/dL) was detected in 10 of the 65 children (15.4%). Seven of these ten hypoglycaemia episodes (70.0%) were categorized as severe (<45 mg/dL). Six of seventy-two (8.3%) had recurrent (more than one) hypoglycaemia (<54 mg/dL) episodes detected by the CGM. All episodes of hypoglycaemia <54 mg/dL detected by CGMs were subclinical or “non-witnessed” episodes with no development of further complications. Mean (SD) time between CGMs insertion and sensor activation was 82.1 (9.3) minutes. Hypoglycaemic episodes (<54 mg/dL) were nocturne in 5/10 children with hypoglycaemia (50.0%) and the mean (SD) duration of fasting preceding the hypoglycaemic episode was 5.5 h (1.2). Hyperglycaemia was detected in 11/65 (15.9%) of the patients, occurring in 4/10 (36.4%) in the first 2 h after food ingestion.

Table 2 compares some key characteristics upon admission in children with any level of hypoglycaemia with those who remained normoglycaemic throughout their entire hospitalization, as determined by CGMs. Univariate analysis showed median age was not significantly different between the hypoglycaemic (<54 mg/dL) and normoglycaemic groups (39, vs 27 months, respectively, OR 1.01 (0.99–1.03), p = 0.514). None of the risk factors assessed in the univariate analysis appeared to be significantly associated with having more hypoglycaemia (any level) during the hospital admission. The majority of children (32/47) were fasting during the night. One of the ten children (10%) who had a hypoglycaemic episode determined by CGMs during hospitalization also had presented with hypoglycaemia upon admission. Higher axillary temperature was significantly different between those with normal glycaemia and those with at least one hypoglycaemia episode (<54 mg/dL) in the univariate analysis. No difference in duration of hospital stay was found. Only one normoglycaemic child died as compared to none of the hypoglycaemic children.
Table 2

Risk factors associated to hypoglycaemia among patients admitted with a malaria diagnosis, according to the univariate analysis

 

Normoglycaemia N = 55, n (%)

Hypoglycaemia N = 10, n (%)

ORe and 95% CI

p valuee

Socio-demographic characteristics

 Age in months (median, IQR)a

27 (10–65)

39 (32–65)

1.01 (0.99–1.03)

0.514

 Male gender

30 (54.6)

7 (70.0)

1.79 (0.45–7.07)

0.405

 Current breastfeeding

21 (38.2)

2 (20.0)

0.47 (010–2.14)

0.330

History of the current disease

 History of fever

55 (100.0)

10 (100.0)

1.00

 

 History of cough

16d (33.3)

4 (40.0)

1.36 (0.36–5.21)

0.650

 History of vomit

7d (14.6)

2 (20.0)

1.63 (0.33–8.14)

0.553

 History of diarrhoea

7d (14.6)

1 (10.0)

0.87 (0.13–5.78)

0.889

 Difficulties to breastfeed/anorexia

23 (41.8)

3 (30.0)

0.65 (0.16–2.56)

0.533

 Difficulties to drink

11 (20.0)

2 (20.0)

1.14 (0.24–5.37)

0.870

 Fasting ≥8 h

37 (67.3)

6 (60.0)

0.71 (0.19–2.68)

0.616

 History of seizures

11d (22.9)

1 (10.0)

0.52 (0.08–3.26)

0.481

Anthropometrics

 Weight in kgb

27.1 (2.2)

22.6 (4.8)

1.04 (0.92–1.18)

0.497

 Global acute malnutritionc

3 (5.5)

1 (10.0)

1.93 (0.18–21.13)

0.585

 Severe acute malnutritionc

1 (1.8)

1 (10.0)

6.00 (0.32–111.87)

0.172

Symptoms and signs on admission

 Axillary temp. (°C)b

38.7d (0.2)

37.7 (0.5)

0.59 (0.35–0.99)

0.046

 Respiratory rateb

36.0d (1.2)

30.9 (1.9)

0.92 (0.82–1.02)

0.111

 BCS at admissionb

4.3 (0.2)

3.9 (0.6)

0.83 (0.56–1.23)

0.358

 Respiratory distress

5d (10.4)

0 (0.0)

0.38 (0.02–7.36)

0.520

 Dehydration

3d (6.3)

1 (10.0)

2.05 (0.26–15.73)

0.489

 Pallor

13d (27.1)

5 (50.0)

2.63 (0.69–10.02)

0.157

 Jaundice

1d (2.1)

1 (10.0)

5.00 (0.47–53.38)

0.183

 Oedema

0d (0.0)

1 (10.0)

15.32 (0.58–405.11)

0.102

 Prostration

11 (20.0)

3 (30.0)

1.81 (0.42–7.51)

0.416

 Unconscious (BCS <5)

11 (20.0)

3 (30.0)

1.81 (0.42–7.51)

0.416

 Deep coma (BCS <2)

10 (18.2)

3 (30.0)

2.02 (0.48–8.50)

0.336

Investigation

 Malaria diagnosis

55 (100.0)

10 (100.0)

1.00

 

 HIV infection

2 (3.8)

1 (10.0)

3.25 (0.38–27.63)

0.280

 Severe anaemia

5d (10.4)

0 (0.0)

0.44 (0.02–8.56)

0.584

 Positive blood culture

1 (1.8)

1 (10.0)

5.74 (0.54–61.11)

0.148

 Hypoglycaemia at admission (<3.0 mmol/L)

4 (7.3)

1 (10.0)

1.81 (0.25–13.00)

0.557

 Hypoglycaemia at admission (<2.5 mmol/L)

2 (3.6)

1 (10.0)

3.38 (0.40–28.68)

0.264

 Normal-low range glycaemia (3–5 mmol/L)

10 (18.2)

1 (10.0)

0.50 (0.06–4.51)

0.529

 Hyperglycaemia at admission (≥11.0 mmol/L)

1 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

1.73 (0.07–45.43)

0.742

 Glycaemia at admission (mmol/L)b

6.3 (0.3)

5.8 (0.6)

0.91 (0.66–1.24)

0.542

 Time up to sensor activation (minutes)b

82.6 (20.3)

79.3 (32.9)

1.00 (0.99–1.01)

0.857

 Hyperparasitaemia (>100,000 parasites/µL)

27 (49.1)

2 (20.0)

0.30 (0.07–1.370)

0.122

Treatment

 Intravenous quinine

1 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

1.73 (0.07–45.43)

0.742

 Intravenous artesunate

51 (92.7)

10 (100.0)

1.84 (0.09–36.71)

0.691

 Blood transfusion

3d (6.3)

1 (10.0)

0.72 (−1.32–2.76)

0.489

Outcome

 Length of admission in daysb

2.5 (0.2)

3.0 (0.6)

1.27 (0.84–1.94)

0.259

 Severe malaria

14 (25.5)

3 (30.0)

1.33 (0.33–5.43)

0.686

 Died

1 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

1.73 (0.07–45.43)

0.742

Value in italic is statistically significant

BCS Blantyre coma score

aAge is presented as median (IQR)

bVariables presented as mean (standard deviation)

cAcute malnutrition calculated using weight-for-Height Z score (up to 5 years) or body mass index (>5 years)

dThese variables contain missing data for 7 patients

eOR and p value derived from Firth logistic regression

The multivariate analysis showed no risk factors independently associated with the presence of at least one episode of any level of hypoglycaemia during the admission (Table 3). Four risk factors showed great effect (OR >2 or <0.5), but none were significantly associated with the development of hypoglycaemia during hospitalization.
Table 3

Multivariable analysis of risk factors associated with having at least one episode of hypoglycaemia during the admission

Risk factors

Hypoglycaemia N = 10, n (%)

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p valueb

Oedemaa

1 (10.0)

20.08

0.74

547.08

0.075

Dehydrationa

1 (10.0)

2.87

0.36

23.02

0.321

Several acute malnutrition (WHZ <−3DS)

1 (10.0)

6.69

0.60

74.41

0.122

Blood culture positivity

1 (10.0)

6.69

0.60

74.41

0.123

WHZ weight-for-height Z score

aThese variables contain missing data for 7 patients

bOR and p value derived from Firth logistic regression

Agreement between continuous measurements of blood glucose using continuous glucose monitor and blood glucose levels using capillary blood glucometer

We used data from 72 patients where CGM measurements were available to assess agreement between both methods of measuring blood glucose. It was possible to obtain 474 paired CGM-CBG measurements. Figure 3 shows the Clarke error grid analysis, where 79.0% of measurements fell in region A, 19.0% of measurements fell in region B, and 2.0% of measurements in region D, without any value in region C or E.
Fig. 3

Clarke error grid analysis comparing measures of continuous glucose monitors vs capillary blood glucometer measures. The figure is divided in the following 5 regions: Region A values within 20% of the reference sensor; Region B values outside 20% of the reference sensor, but that would not lead to an inappropriate treatment, Region C values leading to an unnecessary treatment; Region D values indicating a potentially dangerous failure to detect hypo- or hyper-glycaemia; Region E values that would confuse treatment of hypoglycaemia for hyperglycaemia, and vice versa. CGM glucose levels measured by continuous glucose monitors, CBG capillary glucose levels measured by a glucometer

Figure 4 illustrates the Bland–Altman agreement plot. The 95% limits of agreement (−37.0, 40.0 mg/dL) contained 96% (455/474) of the difference scores. The mean difference of the measurements between CGM and CBG methods was 1.5 mg/dL.
Fig. 4

Bland–Altman plot of the difference between glucose levels measured by continuous glucose monitors (CGM) against those measured by capillar determination using a glucometer (CBG). The within-subject variance is estimated by a random effects model. The 95% limits of agreement (−37.0, 40.0 mg/dL) contained 95% of the difference scores

Discussion

This is the first study conducted in a low-income country using CGMs in a rural district hospital. Additionally, it is the first study assessing glucose homeostasis thorough CGMs in children with malaria. Continuous glucose monitoring has been advocated for many years to improve glycaemic management in critical care settings [18, 20], among diabetic patients [30, 31] or among preterm babies [32]. In the present study, the aim was to conduct a descriptive study using these CGMs to continuously assess blood glucose, and eventually detect hypoglycaemic episodes in children with malaria. The prevalence of hypoglycaemia (<54 mg/dL) on admission in this population was 7.7%, more than twofold higher than that found for all-cause admissions in the same setting [4] and similar to that found in other studies in sub-Saharan Africa for malaria inpatients, although hypoglycaemia definition was not uniform across the studies [13, 15, 3336].

A previous study conducted in the same hospital demonstrated that malaria was a strong predictor of hypoglycaemia (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.09–1.52, p value 0.003) [4]. Since the current study population was restricted to children admitted with malaria, a higher prevalence of hypoglycaemia would have been expected compared to the previous study, which included all-cause admitted children.

Using CGMs, at least one episode of hypoglycaemia (<54 mg/dL) was detected in 10/65 children (15.4%) and in 7/65 (10.8%) using <45 mg/dL threshold, confirming our pre-defined hypothesis that hypoglycaemia in patients with malaria occurs much more frequently than previously described. Only a few studies have explored blood glucose levels beyond admission and throughout hospitalization [15, 36, 37] and using hypoglycaemia thresholds of <54 mg/dL [15] or <45 mg/dL [37], showed a similar prevalence of hypoglycaemia post-admission compared with that found in our study. These studies used standard procedures to measure blood glucose levels such as blood capillary determination [15, 37] and/or venous samples [15, 36, 37]. However, no previous data exist on the occurrence of hypoglycaemia in children with malaria measured with such devices. Only one child with normal-low glycaemia level was detected on admission who did not develop later hypoglycaemia (<54 mg/dL) and survived. This is against to what other authors have reported as an increased risk of later hypoglycaemia and mortality in children with intermediate low glycaemia levels [5, 8, 11]. This difference is likely due to the small sample size and different blood glucose level to define hypoglycaemia.

CGMs were not useful to measure glycaemia at the time of admission, since the sensors started, as expected [38], to detect glucose levels more than 1 h after its insertion, a timing which could make hypoglycaemia consequences become irreversible. Only one child among those with hypoglycaemia on admission presented subsequently hypoglycaemia episodes determined by CGMs. None of the hypoglycaemia episodes were recognised by clinical staff or caregivers, and 50% of these hypoglycaemia episodes were nocturnal. Reasons for this lack of recognition may include, among others, lack of clinical staff at night, poor awareness of symptoms by caregivers or family members, or more simply than those episodes did not associate any clinical symptomatology. Alternatively, it could also be that certain severe conditions, which may last for many hours, including cerebral malaria, may associate clinical but difficult to detect hypoglycaemic episodes in the context of an already altered clinical status. Previous studies using the CGMs have confirmed overnight unrecognized hypoglycaemia is common among children with type 1 diabetes [39] but very little is known on the impact of recognized and unrecognized hypoglycaemia in non-diabetic children. On the other hand, fasting is considered a risk factor because it leads to glycogen depletion, which can result in decreased glucose production and hypoglycaemia [40]. However, using the ADA criteria to measure fasting in our study, no association between lack of caloric intake for ≥8 h and the development of hypoglycaemia could be found. In a study conducted in Suriname, Zijlmans et al. [40] studied glucose kinetics in children with P. falciparum malaria during a 16-h period of controlled fasting. During the following 8 h after controlled fasting, plasma glucose concentrations decreased and no episodes of hypoglycaemia were described. In the same study, a linear regression analysis using a mixed linear model was performed and showed children with non-severe malaria would develop hypoglycaemia after 26 h of controlled fasting and the children with severe malaria would develop hypoglycemia after 33 h of controlled fasting (p 0.036) [40]. It is likely that fasting in this study was too short to find any impact on glucose levels in our patients.

Surprisingly, higher axillary temperature was more common among those children whose glycaemia remained normal in the univariate analysis. This finding needs to be interpreted with caution, as no adjustment for multiplicity of testing has been performed. No risk factors independently associated with having at least one episode of any level of hypoglycaemia were found in the multivariate analysis. Caution is however needed when interpreting these results, since sample size was small and likely insufficient to detect significant differences among both glycaemia groups.

Only one child died in this cohort. It has been demonstrated that malaria is a risk factor to develop hypoglycaemia but it is not a predictor of death because of hypoglycaemia [4]. A previous study conducted in the same hospital showed that malaria was not a risk factor associated to mortality in children with hypoglycaemia on admission [4]. However, these findings are restricted to blood glucose levels on admission and there are no data about newly incident or recurrent hypoglycaemia episodes during their continued hospitalization.

The CEG and modified Bland–Altman analyses for all glucose levels demonstrated that the CGM provides similar readings to the CBG. Indeed, 98% of all readings in the CEG were included in the safe A or B regions and there was no evidence of an increase of the measurements into zones (C, D, E), that would lead to inadequate management of hyper- or hypo-glycaemia, as has been previously reported in a study conducted in preterm newborns [32]. The Bland–Altman analysis showed that the 95% limits of agreement contained 96% (455/474) of the difference scores. Previous studies conducted in other populations have shown that CGMs slightly under-reads glucose levels as compared to CBG [32, 41]. This fact may be explained on account of the differences among studied populations (patients with diabetes or newborns versus children with malaria) and/or the use of different glucometers.

The CEG was initially used to test the accuracy of blood glucose measurement in adults or children with diabetes [42]. Two previous studies performed in preterm babies [32, 43] utilized the CEG to compare glucose values obtained from a Medtronic® device with values obtained from different blood glucose tests and found great correlation between the two methods. However, the interpretation of results in a different population and with different interventional glucose levels needs to be cautious [43].

This study has several limitations. First, the study lacked sufficient statistical power to detect significant associations between hypoglycaemia and its determinants, given the small sample size. Second, as the number of devices was limited, recruitment could not be performed continuously, jeopardizing the representativeness of these results. Third, the CGM system has proven adequate and robust for hyperglycaemia determination [44], but its accuracy may be limited for paired glucose recordings during hypoglycaemia [45]. Sensors used in this cohort had a minimum threshold of 2.2 mmol/L and lower glucose levels were detected, albeit with no measurable values. Finally, and as noted above, the sensor may overestimate hypoglycaemia slightly. However, these results confirm a good correlation between CGMs and capillary assessment.

Conclusions

Although the use of CGM appears insufficiently cost-effective in resource-constrained settings, these data suggest that the CGM is a clinically accurate instrument to evaluate blood glucose levels in children with malaria. Moreover, these data suggest that hypoglycaemic events detected by conventional glucometers may be only the tip of the iceberg of the real burden of hypoglycaemia in children admitted with P. falciparum malaria, because many more hypoglycaemia episodes seem to occur, in spite of their poor clinical translation. A higher sample size would be needed to help establishing some preliminary risk factors for hypoglycaemia during the first days of illness, and help detecting those patients who could most benefit from additional supplementation and a more thorough control to improve prognosis during hospitalization.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

The study was designed by QB, ML and LM. During the study period LM, AS and RV were involved in the diagnosis, recruitment and management of malaria patients and collection of data. QB, AC and LM led the analysis. LM and QB led the interpretation and writing up of this data set, and received input from all authors. All authors read and approved the initial and subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the children and mothers participating in the study. The work of the clinical officers (Valente Jose Melembe, Albertina Eduardo Manhiça and Alice Augusto Chitlhango), data managers, laboratory workers and laboratory coordinator was important for the successful completion of the study. We would like to thank Aina Casellas for sharing her analysis experience with us. The CISM receives financial support from the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation (AECI). QB and LM have been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Health (Contrato Miguel Servet y contrato Rio Hortega respectively, see above). ISGlobal is a member of the CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya. We would like to thank Medtronic® Ibérica for providing the devices for continuous glucose monitoring and technical assistance.

Competing interests

Medtronic® devices were provided by Medtronic® Iberica, however, the authors have declared that no competing interest exists. Quique Bassat had during the duration of the study a fellowship from the program Miguel Servet of the ISCIII (Plan Nacional de I+D+I 2008–2011, Grant Number: CP11/00269). Lola Madrid had a fellowship from the program Río Hortega of the ISCIII (CM13/00260) while the study was conducted. AS, RV, TN, AN, SA, ML, IR and AC and LQ have nothing to declare.

Availability of data and materials

This is a prospective study and data were collected prospectively after the guardian signed the IC. CGMs were provided free of charge by Medtronic Iberica® after the signature of a memorandum of understanding between the company and the research Institute.

Consent for publications

The IC to participate in the study included a consent to publish the results found in this study. A detailed explanation about publication was provided to the family before to sign the IC.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Mozambican National Bioethics Committee (Ref: 132/CNBS/13) and by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain (Ref 2012/7748), prior to study initiation.

Participation in this study was voluntary, and under no circumstances the clinical management of children affected by the decision of their guardians to participate or not in the study. Guardians were free to withdraw the child from the study at any time. Each participant’s guardians received written information about the study which was also explained by trained study staff. Sufficient time was given to the participant’s guardians to decide whether or not to participate in the study. “Participant information and Informed Consent form” was available in Portuguese and Changana, the local language in the Manhiça District.

Funding

Medtronic® devices were provided free of charge by Medtronic® Iberica. No further funding was provided for this project. Medtronic had no role in the design, conduct or evaluation of the study results.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM)
(2)
ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona
(3)
AGC Pediatria Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
(4)
Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
(5)
ICREA

References

  1. Elusiyan JB, Adejuyigbe EA, Adeodu OO. Hypoglycaemia in a Nigerian paediatric emergency ward. J Trop Pediatr. 2006;52:96–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Osier FH, Berkley JA, Ross A, Sanderson F, Mohammed S, Newton CR. Abnormal blood glucose concentrations on admission to a rural Kenyan district hospital: prevalence and outcome. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88:621–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Solomon T, Felix JM, Samuel M, Dengo GA, Saldanha RA, Schapira A, et al. Hypoglycaemia in paediatric admissions in Mozambique. Lancet. 1994;343:149–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Madrid L, Acacio S, Nhampossa T, Lanaspa M, Sitoe A, Maculuve SA, et al. Hypoglycemia and risk factors for death in 13 years of pediatric admissions in Mozambique. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94:218–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Nadjm B, Mtove G, Amos B, Hildenwall H, Najjuka A, Mtei F, et al. Blood glucose as a predictor of mortality in children admitted to the hospital with febrile illness in Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89:232–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Taylor TE, Molyneux ME, Wirima JJ, Fletcher KA, Morris K. Blood glucose levels in Malawian children before and during the administration of intravenous quinine for severe falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1040–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. WHO. Pocket book for hospital care of children: guidelines for the management of common illness with limited resources. 2nd edn ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
  8. Willcox ML, Forster M, Dicko MI, Graz B, Mayon-White R, Barennes H. Blood glucose and prognosis in children with presumed severe malaria: is there a threshold for ‘hypoglycaemia’? Trop Med Int Health. 2009;15:232–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kawo NG, Msengi AE, Swai AB, Chuwa LM, Alberti KG, McLarty DG, et al. Hypoglycaemia and cerebral malaria. Lancet. 1990;336:1128–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. White NJ, Warrell DA, Chanthavanich P, Looareesuwan S, Warrell MJ, Krishna S, et al. Severe hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:61–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Achoki R, Opiyo N, English M. Management of hypoglycaemia in children aged 0–59 months. J Trop Pediatr. 2009;56:227–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. White NJ, Miller KD, Marsh K, Berry CD, Turner RC, Williamson DH, et al. Hypoglycaemia in African children with severe malaria. Lancet. 1987;1:708–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Madrid L, Lanaspa M, Maculuve SA, Bassat Q. Malaria-associated hypoglycaemia in children. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13:267–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bassat Q, Guinovart C, Sigauque B, Aide P, Sacarlal J, Nhampossa T, et al. Malaria in rural Mozambique. Part II: children admitted to hospital. Malar J. 2008;7:37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ogetii GN, Akech S, Jemutai J, Boga M, Kivaya E, Fegan G, et al. Hypoglycaemia in severe malaria, clinical associations and relationship to quinine dosage. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:334.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaufman FR, Austin J, Neinstein A, Jeng L, Halvorson M, Devoe DJ, et al. Nocturnal hypoglycemia detected with the continuous glucose monitoring system in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr. 2002;141:625–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, Bode BW, Buckingham B, Chase HP, Clemons R, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1464–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Branco RG, Chavan A, Tasker RC. Pilot evaluation of continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in children with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;11:415–9.Google Scholar
  19. Bridges BC, Preissig CM, Maher KO, Rigby MR. Continuous glucose monitors prove highly accurate in critically ill children. Crit Care. 2010;14:R176.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Conrad SC, Mastrototaro JJ, Gitelman SE. The use of a continuous glucose monitoring system in hypoglycemic disorders. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004;17:281–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sacoor C, Nhacolo A, Nhalungo D, Aponte JJ, Bassat Q, Augusto O, et al. Profile: Manhica Health Research Centre (Manhica HDSS). Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1309–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Swysen C, Vekemans J, Bruls M, Oyakhirome S, Drakeley C, Kremsner P, et al. Development of standardized laboratory methods and quality processes for a phase III study of the RTS, S/AS01 candidate malaria vaccine. Malar J. 2011;10:223.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. WHO. Malaria microscopy quality assurance manual. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2009. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204266/1/9789241549394_eng.pdf.
  24. Alonso PL, Sacarlal J, Aponte JJ, Leach A, Macete E, Milman J, et al. Efficacy of the RTS, S/AS02A vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum infection and disease in young African children: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:1411–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Saute F, Aponte J, Almeda J, Ascaso C, Abellana R, Vaz N, et al. Malaria in southern Mozambique: malariometric indicators and malaria case definition in Manhica district. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003;97:661–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. World Health Organization. Severe malaria. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19(Suppl 1):7–131.Google Scholar
  27. American Diabetes Association (ADA). Diabetes management guidelines. 2016. http://www.ndei.org/ADA-2016-Guidelines-Criteria-Diabetes-Diagnosis.aspx.html. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
  28. Grummer-Strawn LM, Reinold C, Krebs NF. Use of World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0–59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59((RR-9)):1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2016. http://www.R-project.org.
  30. Fonseca VA, Grunberger G, Anhalt H, Bailey TS, Blevins T, Garg SK, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring: a consensus conference of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology. Endocr Pract. 2016;22:1008–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Foster NC, Miller KM, Tamborlane WV, Bergenstal RM, Beck RW. Continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:e81–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tiberi E, Cota F, Barone G, Perri A, Romano V, Iannotta R, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in preterm infants: evaluation by a modified Clarke error grid. Ital J Pediatr. 2016;42:29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Schellenberg D, Menendez C, Kahigwa E, Font F, Galindo C, Acosta C, et al. African children with malaria in an area of intense Plasmodium falciparum transmission: features on admission to the hospital and risk factors for death. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:431–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Manning L, Laman M, Davis WA, Davis TM. Clinical features and outcome in children with severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86737.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Modiano D, Sirima BS, Sawadogo A, Sanou I, Pare J, Konate A, et al. Severe malaria in Burkina Faso: influence of age and transmission level on clinical presentation. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59:539–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Dondorp AM, Fanello CI, Hendriksen IC, Gomes E, Seni A, Chhaganlal KD, et al. Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): an open-label, randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1647–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. English M, Wale S, Binns G, Mwangi I, Sauerwein H, Marsh K. Hypoglycaemia on and after admission in Kenyan children with severe malaria. QJM. 1998;91:191–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Medtronic®. A practical guide to continuous glucose monitoring. http://www.medtronicdiabetes.com.au/wcm/groups/mdtcom_sg/@mdt/@ap/@au/@diabetes/documents/documents/contrib_107974.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2016.
  39. Wiltshire EJ, Newton K, McTavish L. Unrecognised hypoglycaemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using the continuous glucose monitoring system: prevalence and contributors. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42:758–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zijlmans W, van Kempen A, Ackermans M, de Metz J, Kager P, Sauerwein H. Glucose kinetics during fasting in young children with severe and non-severe malaria in Suriname. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:605–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Caplin NJ, O’Leary P, Bulsara M, Davis EA, Jones TW. Subcutaneous glucose sensor values closely parallel blood glucose during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. Diabet Med. 2003;20:238–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:622–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Beardsall K, Vanhaesebrouck S, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Vanhole C, VanWeissenbruch M, Midgley P, et al. Validation of the continuous glucose monitoring sensor in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98:F136–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DIRECNET) Study Group. The accuracy of the CGMS in children with type 1 diabetes: results of the diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) accuracy study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003;5:781–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Tansey MJ, Beck RW, Buckingham BA, Mauras N, Fiallo-Scharer R, Xing D, et al. Accuracy of the modified continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) sensor in an outpatient setting: results from a diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005;7:109–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement