Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Long-term in vitro culture of Plasmodium vivax isolates from Madagascar maintained in Saimiri boliviensis blood

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1, 2,
  • 3, 4,
  • 4,
  • 1, 4,
  • 3, 4,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3, 4,
  • 1Email authorView ORCID ID profile and
  • 1Email author
Malaria Journal201716:442

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2090-7

©  The Author(s) 2017

  • Received: 21 June 2017
  • Accepted: 27 October 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Plasmodium vivax is the most prevalent human malaria parasite and is likely to increase proportionally as malaria control efforts more rapidly impact the prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum. Despite the prominence of P. vivax as a major human pathogen, vivax malaria qualifies as a neglected and under-studied tropical disease. Significant challenges bringing P. vivax into the laboratory, particularly the capacity for long-term propagation of well-characterized strains, have limited the study of this parasite’s red blood cell (RBC) invasion mechanism, blood-stage development, gene expression, and genetic manipulation.

Methods and results

Patient isolates of P. vivax have been collected and cryopreserved in the rural community of Ampasimpotsy, located in the Tsiroanomandidy Health District of Madagascar. Periodic, monthly overland transport of these cryopreserved isolates to the country’s National Malaria Control Programme laboratory in Antananarivo preceded onward sample transfer to laboratories at Case Western Reserve University, USA. There, the P. vivax isolates have been cultured through propagation in the RBCs of Saimiri boliviensis. For the four patient isolates studied to-date, the median time interval between sample collection and in vitro culture has been 454 days (range 166–961 days). The median time in culture, continually documented by light microscopy, has been 159 days; isolate AMP2014.01 was continuously propagated for 233 days. Further studies show that the P. vivax parasites propagated in Saimiri RBCs retain their ability to invade human RBCs, and can be cryopreserved, thawed and successfully returned to productive in vitro culture.

Conclusions/significance

Long-term culture of P. vivax is possible in the RBCs of Saimiri boliviensis. These studies provide an alternative to propagation of P. vivax in live animals that are becoming more restricted. In vitro culture of P. vivax in Saimiri RBCs provides an opening to stabilize patient isolates, which would serve as precious resources to apply new strategies for investigating the molecular and cellular biology of this important malaria parasite.

Keywords

  • Madagascar
  • In vitro culture
  • Plasmodium vivax

Background

Plasmodium vivax threatens the public health of over 2.5 billion people in 95 countries around the world [1, 2]. While the knowledge about P. vivax has been significantly advanced through in vivo infections of humans [3–7] and non-human primates [8–10], incentives to develop in vitro culture systems arise from ethical concerns and the costs linked to propagation of malaria parasites in these hosts [11–13]. In contrast to Plasmodium falciparum [14] and other human/simian [15–19] malaria parasite species, laboratory methods for culturing P. vivax have lagged behind, and have limited studies on the molecular and cellular parasitology of this parasite. Therefore, significant research interest has been focused on improving in vitro culture of P. vivax [20–23].

The goal of in vitro culture studies is easily understood from the success that has been demonstrated in the laboratory with P. falciparum over the past 40 years [14]. Through the availability of a robust approach for culturing P. falciparum, it has been possible to adapt parasite strains for stable in vitro culture from infected human blood samples and from isolates propagated in non-human primates since the mid-1970s [24–26]. Parasites have been grown with sufficient viability in the laboratory to perform genetic crosses and to isolate progeny to enable genetic linkage studies that have identified genes linked to specific parasite phenotypes [27–30]. It has been possible to identify components of the parasite’s red blood cell (RBC) invasion mechanism [31–33], and to examine mechanisms of resistance against a wide range of anti-malarial drugs [34–36]. Rounding out the achievements arising from reliable culture of P. falciparum is the ability to perform genetic manipulation of the parasite to verify genetic underpinnings of the parasite’s complex biology [22, 37–39]. Much of this has required development of methods for long-term culture, storage, and rejuvenation of well-characterized parasite strains.

Various methods have been described and reviewed since Bass and Johns first attempted to culture P. vivax in 1912 [40]. These approaches have employed a number of strategies for preparing parasites for in vitro culture, adjusting the culture media and varying concentrations of human serum ([41–50]; reviewed in [20, 21]). Acknowledging the P. vivax host reticulocyte cell preference, considerable attention has focused on reticulocyte enrichment methods and supplementation of cultures with those cells [41, 50–56]. Despite progress, observations published and unpublished have acknowledged the challenges still experienced in attempts to culture this parasite. Additionally, attempts to develop a durable system for long-term in vitro culture of P. vivax remain tentative.

Many of these challenges can be overcome by use of non-human primate models, such as the Bolivian squirrel monkey, Saimiri boliviensis, which allows optimized blood-stage P. vivax infections with blood draws timed to enrich individual life cycle stages, allowing increased association of identified proteins with individual developmental stages and disease processes [57, 58]. Additionally, studies using Plasmodium cynomolgi propagated in Southeast Asian macaques have provided opportunity to perform valuable heterologous comparative RBC invasion analyses of human RBCs with P. vivax [59]. Despite these efforts to propagate these parasites in live animals, there are efforts to eliminate (chimpanzees [60]) or curtail (monkeys [61, 62]) these animal models, and repository supplies of historically available resources are approaching a critically low level.

A goal of the current studies in Madagascar is to collect P. vivax isolates from infected people and prepare them for in vitro growth and red cell invasion experiments. These studies are performed in follow-up to the observation that P. vivax demonstrates significant capacity to infect Duffy-negative individuals in Madagascar [63], and the observation of new P. vivax genes and genetic variation [64, 65]. As a first step toward this goal, a system has been established for collection and cryopreservation of infected blood samples from people living in rural communities significantly removed from laboratory facilities, followed by long-term propagation in an in vitro culture system. Taking the lead from past and present efforts, this culture system uses RBCs from S. boliviensis, as it has been used for P. vivax short-term in vitro culture [45], and has also been used extensively to support parasite propagation in live animals [57, 66–70]. Although a number of studies have included efforts to enrich reticulocytes, the demonstrated target cells for P. vivax [41, 51, 52, 54–56], the in vitro culture system evaluated here did not include reticulocyte enrichment. The methods described here enable in vitro propagation, expansion, and cryopreservation of patient isolates for further studies.

Methods

Study site and protocol guidelines

This study was conducted in the western highlands fringe region of Madagascar, in the foothills between the central highlands and the western tropical coastal zone. This area is endemic for both P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria [63], and shows distinct malaria seasonal trends that peak from April to May annually [71].

Longitudinal surveillance was set up in partnership with local doctors at the three Ampasimpotsy health facilities [GPS locations: − 19.19685, 46.1390 (north); − 19.24525, 46.18026 (center); − 19.37066, 46.11724 (south)]. These facilities are rural clinics serving catchment populations of 1500–3000 in the Tsiroanomandidy health district [72]. All patients reporting to a clinic with fever were screened for malaria using the SD Bioline Malaria Ag P.f/Pan rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and light microscopy by a WHO-certified technician. Any patients with P. vivax were invited to participate in the present study. Patients were enrolled following informed consent by a local doctor qualified in NIH Human Subjects Training. A parent or guardian provided written informed consent on behalf of participants under the age of 18 years. This study was conducted following a protocol approved by the University Hospitals of Cleveland Institutional Review Board (#09-13-01), the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases/NIAID/NIH (#13-0067), and the Madagascar Ministry of Health Ethics Committee (#099). All malaria infections were treated by the health practitioner with an age-adjusted course of artesunate-amodiaquine, in accordance with the Madagascar Ministry of Health guidelines [73].

Sample collection, processing and storage

A 7–10 mL venous blood sample was drawn into a K+-EDTA and/or Na+-heparin vacutainer and stored at 4 °C up to 24 h prior to cryopreservation. Cryopreservation of P. vivax-infected blood samples closely followed the method described by J. Normark [74]. The blood sample was mixed with an equal volume of Glycerolyte 57 solution and aliquoted into 2-mL tubes for cryopreservation. The tubes were stored in a −20 °C freezer for 24 h and subsequently transferred into a liquid nitrogen dry shipper. Cryopreserved samples were shipped from Madagascar to the U.S. over a 10-day period. The samples were unpacked onto dry ice to minimize thawing during transfer to longer-term storage in a liquid nitrogen freezer.

In vitro cultivation of Plasmodium vivax patient isolates

In vitro culture of the P. vivax isolates described herein was initiated for four different P. vivax-infected patient blood samples. These included patient sample Ext30703 (isolate—AMP2014.01, collected in EDTA), patient sample 1040902 (AMP2014.02, collected in heparin), patient sample Ext2838 (AMP2016.01, collected in EDTA) and patient sample Ext3276 (AMP2016.02, collected in EDTA). These P. vivax isolates were cultured in AIM V serum-free medium (Gibco), containing l-glutamine, streptomycin sulfate at 50 µg/mL, and gentamicin sulfate at 10 µg/mL. AIM V medium was developed in 1987 for generating lymphokine-activated killer cells to support adoptive immunotherapy clinical trials [75–77] and to culture/proliferate macrophages [78] and lymphocytes [79, 80]. The medium is substantially equivalent to Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), used broadly for tissue and cell culture processing applications (manufacturer’s notes). In the present study, AIM V medium was supplemented with 2.4 mM l-glutamine, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), and 0.2 mM hypoxanthine. 10-mL aliquots were stored in 15-mL conical base centrifuge tubes at −80 °C. Immediately before using, the medium-containing tube was completely thawed and heat-inactivated, pooled human AB serum (Gemini Bio-products) was added at 10% final concentration. This complete AIM V medium was kept at 37 °C in a 10% CO2 incubator until use.

The cryopreserved P. vivax-infected patient blood samples were thawed using a modified, decreasing NaCl concentration gradient (12, 1.6, and 0.9%) method [81]. After the final NaCl treatment, the blood sample pellet volume was measured (30–80 μL) and re-suspended in 5 mL of complete AIM V medium in a 6-well tissue culture plate. Two mL whole blood from Bolivian squirrel monkeys (S. boliviensis), collected in EDTA, was obtained from the Biologics Production Program, Michale E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Protocol Number: 00000451-RN01-AR001). The blood was shipped on ice overnight, and was leukocyte depleted using CF11 (Whatman) cellulose powder-filled plastic syringe columns immediately after it was received. Following depletion, it was stored at 4 °C for 2–3 weeks in complete malaria culture medium (CMCM) [82]; 2 mL CMCM was added to 1 mL RBCs. The leukocyte-depleted Saimiri blood (e.g. 1746 cells counted, no WBCs observed) was added to the complete AIM V medium containing P. vivax-infected patient blood pellet to achieve 4% haematocrit. Parasite cultures were maintained at 37 °C in 10% CO2. The culture medium was changed daily using freshly prepared complete medium.

Lysis was observed in the culture every 96–120 h. At that time, the whole content of the well was transferred to a 15-mL conical tube and centrifuged (1000 rpm, 5 min). The pellet was measured, re-suspended in fresh complete medium (5 mL) in a new well, and Saimiri RBCs were added to restore 4% haematocrit. Generally, lysis was approximately 50%, as the pellet was measured to be approximately 100 µL, and did not appear to increase as a function of blood storage time at 4 °C.

Microscopy

Standard blood smear microscopy was performed to monitor parasite growth. Briefly, thin smears were prepared by spreading 2 µL of resuspended cultures on a glass slide and were fixed in 100% methanol. Fixed slides were stained with 4% Giemsa (Sigma-Aldrich), diluted with 1× buffered distilled water pH 7.4, for 30 min, and examined using oil immersion (100×). Parasitaemia was estimated by counting a total of 1000 RBCs from 10 to 20 fields, each with 50–100 RBCs. On a few occasions, a second slide was made and evaluated. The percent of infected RBCs was determined by enumerating the number of infected RBCs in relation to the number of uninfected RBCs ([No. infected RBCs/Total No. RBCs counted] × 100 = Percent Infected RBCs). Reticulocytes in Saimiri blood were enumerated using Retic-Chex® Stain (Streck) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Preparation of DNA template

Genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Extracted samples included P. falciparum, P. vivax, Plasmodium malariae, and Plasmodium ovale-infected blood samples that served as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) controls; blood samples were provided by the Malaria Research and Reference Reagent Resource Center (MR4; now merged with BEI Resources) and Dr. W. E. Collins (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Additionally, DNA was extracted from 20 to 100 µL of each P. vivax-infected Madagascar patient sample and P. vivax in vitro culture.

Molecular diagnosis of Plasmodium species infection

PCR-based Plasmodium species diagnosis employed a ligase detection reaction-fluorescent microsphere assay (LDR-FMA). All methods for PCR amplification of small sub-unit rRNA target sequences and Plasmodium species-specific detection by LDR-FMA have been described in detail by McNamara et al. [83]. Species-specific fluorescence data were collected using the Bio-Plex Manager 3.0 software (Bio-Rad).

DNA sequence analysis of polymorphic Plasmodium vivax-specific genes

To have a peek at potential strain complexities of the P. vivax field isolates, nested PCR amplification was performed to amplify P. vivax Duffy binding protein (PvDBP) and apical membrane antigen-1 (PvAMA-1) gene sequences. Nested PCR amplification reactions (25 μL) were performed (0.2 μM for each of the appropriate upstream (Up) and downstream (Dn) primers, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.3), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 0.01% gelatin, 50 μM for each dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP, 2.5 units of thermostable DNA polymerase, and 3 μL of DNA template) for both gene sequences using the primer pairs provided in Additional file 1: Table S1. PvDBP PCR conditions for both nest 1 and nest 2 were: 95 °C 1 min; 95 °C 30 s, 58 °C 30 s, 72 °C 45 s (× 39); 72 °C 4 min. PvAMA-1 PCR conditions were according to Moon et al. [84]. After 2% agarose gel electrophoresis (1 × Tris–borate–EDTA buffer) and staining with SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen), the PvDBP and PvAMA-1 nest 2 reaction products were observed to be of 518 and 395 bp in length, respectively.

Sanger sequencing of PvDBP and PvAMA-1 nest 2 amplicons was performed using a modified Applied Biosystems BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle sequencing kit protocol. Sequencing reactions were performed on the ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer system (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were analysed using Sequencher v5.2 (Gene Codes Corporation) and Geneious 7.0.6 software (Biomatters).

Saimiri-adapted Plasmodium vivax invasion of human RBCs

To test whether Saimiri blood-adapted P. vivax could successfully invade human RBCs, a second culture of isolate AMP2014.01 was initiated from a duplicate cryopreserved patient blood sample vial 961 days after collection. The culture conditions, including medium, Saimiri RBCs, incubation temperature and atmosphere, of the second culture were the same as described above. The culture in Saimiri RBCs was maintained for 25 days ahead of performing the human RBC invasion experiment. Over these 25 days, the culture medium was changed daily using freshly prepared complete medium, and Saimiri RBCs were added 5 times to maintain 4% haematocrit. The average parasitaemia during this time was 0.325%. The parasitaemia on the day that the invasion experiment was initiated was 0.3%.

For the human RBC invasion experiment, the blood was drawn from a local donor of European descent carrying FY*B/*B genotype. The blood was leukocyte depleted using CF11 (Whatman) cellulose powder-filled plastic syringe columns, before use in the experiment.

In this invasion experiment, Saimiri and human RBCs without parasites were used as controls. Each experimental and control condition was plated in triplicate in a 96-well plate. The total volume per well was 180 μL. For ensuring the reintroduction of Saimiri blood-adapted P. vivax to human RBCs, each experimental well had 4% haematocrit (total 7.2 μL RBCs) with an estimated parasite:target ratio of 1:9 (0.72 μL of infected Saimiri blood and 6.48 μL of human target blood). Thus, from the addition of 0.72 μL infected Saimiri blood with 0.3% initial parasitaemia, there were estimated 10,800 infected RBCs per well. Given that there are 7 × 106 RBCs/μL in Saimiri blood [85], and 5 × 106 RBCs/μL in human blood, there would be a total of approximately 37 × 106 RBCs in 7.2 μL, of which 10,800 were infected. Thus, the starting parasitaemia for the invasion experiment was estimated to be 0.03%.

The plate was maintained in a 10% CO2 incubator as above, and the medium was changed daily. Slides were made at 0, 72, and 144 h by resuspending each experimental well, and placing 1 μL of the resuspension on a glass slide. The slides were fixed in methanol and stained in Giemsa for microscopy as described above.

Flow cytometry

At the 72 and 144 h time points, 25 μL of the resuspended in vitro P. vivax culture was incubated at 37°C for 30 min in 380 μL of flow cytometry stain. No extra Saimiri or human RBCs were added between 72 and 144 h. The flow cytometry staining solution [82, 86] was comprised of 5 μM Hoechst 33,342 (DNA stain, Invitrogen), 5 μM Pyronin Y (RNA stain, Sigma-Aldrich), and a FITC-conjugated Glycophorin A (CD235a) mouse anti-human monoclonal antibody (clone: CLB-ery-1 (AME-1), to differentiate human and Saimiri RBCs, Invitrogen), which was diluted 1:50 in 1 × PBS. After incubation, the stained in vitro culture was maintained on ice until flow imaging was complete with exposure to the UV 440, Yellow–Green 582, and Blue 525 lasers and filters on the Becton–Dickinson LSRII flow cytometer in the Cytometry & Imaging Microscopy Core Facility of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (CWRU). A total of 600,000 cells (events) per well were counted. The data was further analysed and gated using FCS Express 6 (De Novo Software).

Cryopreservation and re-cultivation of cultured Plasmodium vivax patient isolate

From the second culture of isolate AMP2014.01 on day 69 post-culture, with parasitaemia at 0.35%, a 75 μL aliquot was mixed with an equal volume of Glycerolyte 57 solution and transferred into a 2-mL tube for cryopreservation. On day 5 post-cryopreservation, the cryopreserved aliquot was thawed and returned to culture using the same methods described above for the original patient isolate.

Results

Diagnosis of Plasmodium species infection in patient samples

All study patients exhibited symptoms of clinical malaria when they presented themselves to the Ampasimpotsy Health Centres from June 2014 to January 2017. Patient Ext30703 (AMP2014.01), a 15-year old male, presented with a fever of 38.0 °C, tested positive by malaria RDT and was slide-positive for P. vivax with a parasitaemia of 6320 parasites/µL (0.13%). Patient 1040902 (AMP2014.02), a 43-year old female, presented with a fever of 38.2 °C, tested positive by malaria RDT and was P. vivax slide-positive (1200 parasites/µL, 0.024%). Patient Ext2838 (AMP2016.01), a 3-year old male presented with a temperature of 36.7 °C, was malaria RDT positive and slide-positive for P. vivax (5509 parasites/µL, 0.11%). Patient Ext3276 (AMP2016.02), a 12-year old male, presented with a fever of 39.0 °C, was positive by malaria RDT and was slide-positive for P. vivax with a parasitaemia of 13,359 parasites/µL (0.27%). Molecular diagnosis using LDR-FMA [83] determined that all the above mentioned patient blood samples were positive only for P. vivax infection.

In vitro culture initiation and growth dynamics of Plasmodium vivax patient isolates

Among the four patient isolates studied to-date, the median time interval between sample collection and in vitro culture was 454 days (range 166–961 days) (Table 1). The first in vitro culture for AMP2014.01 was initiated 666 days after collection; a second culture was initiated 961 days post-collection. In vitro culture for AMP2014.02, AMP2016.01 and AMP2016.02 was initiated 454, 298 and 166 days after collection, respectively.
Table 1

In vitro culture and growth characteristics of Malagasy P. vivax isolates

Isolate

Ampasimpotsy Health Center

Parasitaemia (parasitized RBCs/μL)

Culture initiation (days post- collection)

Culture duration (days)

2014.01 (first)

AMP Central

6320

666

233

2014.01 (second)

  

961

165

2014.02

AMP North

1200

454

155

2016.01

AMP South

5509

298

36

2016.02

AMP South

13,359

166

159

Growth dynamics of isolate AMP2014.01, as monitored by Giemsa-stained thin smears, is presented in Fig. 1. Parasite density fluctuated between 0.2 and 1.0% (median 0.6%) during the first 60 days, and then maintained at 0.1–0.4% (median 0.3%) for the remaining in vitro culture period. At the beginning, the isolate was cultured in one 5-mL well for 71 days. Saimiri RBCs were added every 96–120 h to maintain 4% haematocrit. On day 72, 65% lysis (pellet volume 70 µL), instead of usual 50%, was observed. At that time, the culture was split into two 1-mL wells (24-well tissue culture plate) and the growth was further monitored. Isolate AMP2014.01 was in culture for 233 days, and was ended because of bacterial contamination. A second culture of this parasite was in continuous culture for 165 days (median parasitaemia 0.3%) and was terminated. From this second culture, human RBC invasion experiment was performed on day 25 post-culture, and cryopreservation and re-cultivation was attempted on day 69 post-culture (results below). Giemsa-stained trophozoite stages from the AMP2014.01 patient blood sample are shown in Fig. 2a, b. Additional parasite forms observed across the duration of the in vitro culture are shown in Fig. 2c–f. One may expect differences in the appearance of these parasite forms compared to what is possible from ex vivo samples (whether from humans, or nonhuman primates). Gametocytes were observed occasionally, but were not evaluated (counted) separately.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

In vitro propagation of Plasmodium vivax patient isolate AMP2014.01. The fluctuation in growth of the parasites cultured in complete AIM V medium. Standard blood smear microscopy was performed to monitor parasite growth. Slides were made at intervals ranging from 2 to 15 days. Slides were made either after the medium was changed and the culture was resuspended, or right after the centrifugation to determine lysis and resuspending the pellet into fresh medium, but before adding Saimiri RBCs to readjust the haematocrit to 4%. With the patient parasitaemia of 0.13% on day 0, the culture parasitaemia fluctuated considerably during the first 60 days, and then maintained for the remaining culture period. DNA was extracted from cultured AMP2014.01 on days 86 and 202. PCR amplification and direct sequencing of PvDBP and PvAMA-1 segments was performed at these time points to enable comparison between these sequences and those amplified from the infected patient blood sample prior to in vitro propagation

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Plasmodium vivax AMP2014.01 blood smear images. a, b Trophozoite stages observed in the patient blood smear prepared at the time of sample collection. c–f show various infected Saimiri RBCs during 233 days of continuous in vitro culture; c young trophozoite (day 14); d maturing trophozoite (day 26); e doubly infected RBC (day 47), f Schizont (day 180)

The median time in culture for the four isolates studied here has been 159 days (Table 1). AMP2014.02 and AMP2016.01 were in culture for 155 days (median parasitaemia 0.55%) and 36 days (median parasitaemia 0.2%), respectively. AMP2014.02 was terminated, whereas AMP2016.01 was ended because of bacterial contamination. AMP2016.02 was in continuous culture for 159 days (median parasitaemia 0.26%) and was terminated. Thus, it is evident that these parasites survived all stages of collection, cryopreservation, shipping, and thawing.

Molecular characterization of cultured Plasmodium vivax patient isolates

On days 86 and 202, 40 μL of packed cells from one well of isolate AMP2014.01 were used to extract genomic DNA, which was subjected to molecular diagnosis using LDR-FMA and sequence analysis of the PvDBP and PvAMA-1 genes. On these days, the estimated parasitaemias were 0.4 and 0.3%, respectively (Fig. 1). The LDR-FMA Plasmodium species diagnostic assay results confirmed the presence of only P. vivax in the culture.

DNA sequence analysis of PvDBP (518 bp) and PvAMA-1 (395 bp) gene regions were performed to assess potential strain complexity of isolate AMP2014.01. These analyses are shown in comparison to the homologous sequences from the Sal-1, Chesson, and Palo Alto strains of P. vivax analysed as controls. Amino acid sequence comparisons are presented in Additional file 2: Figures S1 and S2, respectively. These results show that the PvDBP and PvAMA-1 haplotype sequences from the cultures on days 86 and 202 (2014.01b and 2014.01c) were identical to those obtained from the patient blood sample (2014.01a). In addition, these results show that isolate AMP2014.01, collected from the Madagascar field site, carried PvDBP and PvAMA-1 haplotypes that varied in numerous positions compared to the Sal-1, Chesson, and Palo Alto strains. Finally, each of the other three Malagasy P. vivax patient samples, collected from the same field site and subjected to in vitro culture, was characterized by unique PvDBP and PvAMA-1 haplotypes. These observations technically exclude the possibility that the molecular diagnostic results might have been generated from the genomic DNA of control strains.

Saimiri-adapted Plasmodium vivax invasion of human RBCs

Following the adaptation of AMP2014.01 (second culture) to propagation in Saimiri RBCs for 25 days, it was investigated whether this isolate had retained the ability to invade human RBCs. Flow cytometry to assess the invasion of human RBCs was performed on cultures harvested at 72 and 144 h. The glycophorin A (GPA, CD235a) monoclonal antibody that stains human and not Saimiri RBCs was used to distinguish target from donor cells, respectively. Results in Fig. 3 compare binding of the GPA monoclonal antibody to Saimiri vs. human RBCs without (controls panels a and b, respectively), and with (panel c) parasites. These results illustrate the specificity of the GPA monoclonal antibody for human RBCs, and established the gating parameters to evaluate AMP2014.01 invasion of human RBCs (panels d–f).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Identification and propagation of Plasmodium vivax AMP2014.01-infected human RBCs by flow cytometry. a–c The human glycophorin A (GPA)-specific monoclonal antibody (CD235a) was used to differentiate human RBCs from Saimiri RBCs separately and in mixed cultures. For experiments in a, b host RBCs were not exposed to AMP2014.01; infected Saimiri RBCs were introduced in the experiment shown in c. Assessment of FSC (Y-axis) in all panels further defines gating parameters of GPA− and GPA+ parasitized RBCs. d–f AMP2014.01-infected Saimiri RBCs were mixed with fresh human RBCs and their GPA+/DNA+ cells were identified (top right corner) at time 0, 72, and 144 h. Results show only those human GPA+ RBCs appearing within gating defined in a–c. All controls and experiments were run in triplicate

Evaluation of the P. vivax propagation in human RBCs included addition of Hoechst 33342 (DNA stain) and Pyronin Y (RNA stain). Because RBCs do not contain a nucleus, uninfected RBCs would not stain with Hoechst 33,342. While human reticulocytes would retain residual RNA and stain positive for Pyronin Y, they would not stain positive for DNA with Hoechst 33342. Results (Fig. 3d–f) show DNA and RNA staining of GPA-positive RBCs, comparing time 0 h uninfected controls to 72 h and 144 h P. vivax infection time points. Given the 48-h in vivo replication cycle of P. vivax, the experimental time periods would represent 1.5–3 replication cycles. Three replicate cultures showed that the mean infected cell counts at 0 h was 0, at 72 h was 166 (range 112–202), and at 144 h was 211.3 (range 166–242). It was noted that there was a slight increase in the number of P. vivax-infected DNA+/RNA+ cells between the 72 and 144 h cultures (e.g., 202 to 242). Given that a total of 600,000 RBCs were counted by the flow cytometry, of which 540,000 were estimated to be human RBCs (parasite:target ratio 1:9), these 202 (72 h) and 242 (144 h) GPA-positive infected RBCs translate to 0.037 and 0.045% parasitaemias, respectively. Additionally, there appeared to be an increase in the RNA signal among infected cells in the 144 h culture, indicating cellular activity, which is consistent with previous studies of P. falciparum [82]. These results are consistent with a conclusion that, while propagated in Saimiri RBCs for a period of 25 days, isolate AMP2014.01 retained the capacity for invading and replicating in human RBCs.

Microscopic evaluation of the Giemsa-stained smears, made at 72 and 144 h from the wells showing 202 and 242 GPA-positive infected RBCs, showed that the corresponding parasitaemias were 0.1 and 0.2%, respectively. Infected human RBCs were not distinguished from infected Saimiri RBCs on these slides. Nevertheless, this evaluation confirms that new parasite invasion events occurred, as the starting parasitaemia for the invasion experiment was estimated to be 0.03% (see “Methods”).

Cryopreservation and re-cultivation of cultured Plasmodium vivax patient isolate

The cryopreserved aliquot of cultured isolate AMP2014.01 was in continuous culture for 88 days and was terminated. The aliquot was cryopreserved at a parasitaemia of 0.35%. During the culture period, the parasitaemia ranged 0.1–0.4% (median 0.3%). These results suggest that this could be a successful cryopreservation and re-cultivation method for in vitro-generated parasites. These results appear to pave the way to stabilizing patient isolates and providing significant amounts of precious resources for further studies.

Discussion

This study reports the progress made toward long-term in vitro culture of P. vivax isolates originating from infected patients in Ampasimpotsy, located in the Tsiroanomandidy Health District of Madagascar. This region has previously been shown to experience consistent transmission of P. vivax [63, 72, 87], including among Duffy-negative people [63]. Important first steps for understanding the genetic characteristics and biology of P. vivax parasites from this region require developing reliable methods for collecting, storing, transporting field-collected blood samples, and culturing parasites from those samples. All of the long-term in vitro culture work performed here has used whole blood from squirrel monkeys (S. boliviensis), without reticulocyte enrichment. These methods have reproducibly yielded long-term cultures of all four P. vivax isolates attempted so far (median time 159 days, range 36–233 days); none of the isolates failed to propagate using this culture system. This reproducibility was observed regardless of the anticoagulant, K+-EDTA or Na+-heparin, used in vacutainers to collect and store patient blood samples before cryopreservation. Furthermore, one of these isolates, AMP2014.01, demonstrated reproducible capacity for culture in Saimiri RBCs (two different long-term cultures have been initiated from separate cryopreserved blood sample vials), retained capacity for infecting human RBCs, and could be cryopreserved and re-cultivated.

Cultivation of Plasmodium vivax patient isolates

The four P. vivax isolates cultured in this study were collected from patients with parasitaemias as low as 0.024% to as high as 0.27%. In addition, the time interval between sample collection and in vitro culture varied from 166 to 961 days. Despite this variation, a final pellet of intact RBCs between 30 to 80 μL was regularly observed when these patient samples were thawed and prepared for in vitro culture. The starting culture parasitaemias on day 0 from these thawed samples are likely to have been lower than the corresponding patient parasitaemias due to lysis during the thawing process. Thus, these methods proved to be efficient and reproducible in initiating cultures from small amounts of parasite material, and the success of culturing did not appear to be limited by low patient parasitaemia.

Along this line that these cultivation methods were efficient and reproducible in initiating cultures from low parasite material, cryopreservation and re-cultivation of the cultured parasites was achieved successfully. Seventy-five microliter of isolate AMP2014.01 (second culture) at a parasitaemia of 0.35% were cryopreserved. When this aliquot was thawed, a 20 μL pellet of intact RBCs was recovered and a culture in one 1-mL well was initiated. From this starting material, a parasitaemia of 0.4% was observed on day 33; the culture was split into two 1-mL wells on day 35, and was terminated on day 88.

An overall assessment of the growth dynamics of the patient isolates AMP2014.01 (first culture, 233 days; second culture, 165 days), AMP2014.02 (155 days), and AMP2016.02 (159 days) shows that the parasitaemia generally ranged 0.1–0.4%; for isolate AMP2014.02, it reached 1% twice during the culture period. A unique growth pattern was observed for isolate AMP2014.01 (first culture), where the parasitaemia fluctuated considerably during the first 60 days, and then maintained for the remaining culture period. This observation in particular is similar to those made by Roobsoong et al. [50] regarding patient isolates cultured in modified McCoy’s 5A medium with reticulocytes purified from adult peripheral blood added daily. In their culture system, parasite density was dramatically dropped during the first week of culture and then maintained at very low density for the whole culture period. Most of their 30 isolates shared a similar growth pattern with fluctuations of parasitaemia (Fig. 7b [50]).

As lysis (~ 50%) was observed in the culture every 96–120 h, Saimiri RBCs were added to maintain 4% haematocrit. The lysis did not appear to reflect expansion of the culture. Extensive breakage of Saimiri erythrocytes in the culture was reported previously by Lanners [45], which may reflect the extensive host-cell modifications that the parasite induces in the infected erythrocytes [88].

It is important to note that microscopic evaluation of the cultures was performed by counting a total of 1000 RBCs (10–20 100× fields, 50–100 RBCs/field) from 2 μL of resuspended cultures. Also, the intervals when the slides were made to evaluate parasitaemia were not regular, and ranged from 2 to 15 days. Average daily rate of change in parasitaemia of isolate AMP2014.01 (first culture) over 233 days culture period, divided into early (days 0–60, 10 observations) and later (days 75–233, 20 observations) periods, was estimated. Linear regression analysis showed that, with a patient parasitaemia of 0.13% at the initiation of the culture (day 0), the parasitaemia significantly increased by 0.064% (95% confidence interval 0.032–0.095, P = 0.001) per day during the early period. However, with parasitaemia reaching 0.3% on day 75, the parasitaemia did not significantly change during the later period. The growth dynamics of isolates AMP2014.01 (second culture) and AMP2016.02 were highly similar to that of isolate AMP2014.01 (first culture) during the later period. It is possible that counting more RBCs per slide and/or making slides to evaluate parasitaemia at a regular interval, every 48 h cycle of invasion and multiplication, may have provided a more accurate assessment of parasite growth dynamics and multiplication rate.

Finally, molecular characterization of the PvDBP and PvAMA-1 segments was performed, which were amplified from all four patient isolates and AMP2014.01 (first culture) aliquots taken on days 86 and 202. This analysis provides some assessment of the genetic diversity in these samples, shows differences from the commonly used parasite strains, and proves that the AMP2014.01 patient isolate and culture aliquots carry the same haplotypes. Efforts to generate enough cultured packed cell volume required to carry out further genome-wide analysis are underway.

Cross-species propagation

Given that long-term in vitro culture of P. vivax has been possible in RBCs from S. boliviensis, a question was whether this cross-species exposure eliminated the ability of P. vivax to invade human RBCs. The experimental results summarized in Fig. 3d–f, indicate that isolate AMP2014.01 retains the ability to invade human RBCs in the context of short-term invasion assays. Results that P. vivax strains exposed to Saimiri and Aotus RBCs do not lose their abilities to infect human RBCs are not unexpected given previously published results. Since the late 1980s, multiple monkey-adapted P. vivax strains (including Belem [41], Chesson [44], AMRU-1 [89] and Sal-1 [56]) have successfully been used under a number of different study designs to infect human RBCs.

While it is encouraging that Saimiri-adapted parasites were still able to invade human RBCs after 25 days in culture, it is acknowledged that this is a short time period. It remains to perform such studies using parasites which have been in culture for a longer period, and to investigate the variability of successful human RBC invasion among different patient isolates.

Comparisons with previous approaches

Other groups have performed numerous well-designed investigations to improve in vitro culture of P. vivax. Given the robust productivity experienced with in vitro cultivation of the Malagasy P. vivax isolates in Saimiri RBCs, this system was compared to previous studies (Additional file 3: Table S2). Most of the previous studies have focused their efforts on long-term and short-term in vitro culture of P. vivax in human RBCs, with the notable exception of Mons et al. [90], who used Aotus RBCs for short-term growth of the parasite.

One previous study, by Lanners, most similar to the work performed here, attempted prolonged in vitro culture of the P. vivax Chesson strain in Saimiri RBCs and in a 1:1 mixture of Saimiri and human RBCs [45]. Further comparison with Lanners provides a contrast in methods and outcomes compared to the present study. In the discussion of his study, which concluded by sustaining low levels of P. vivax in vitro propagation for 16–22 days, Lanners commented that attempts to culture the parasite in Saimiri RBCs and Saimiri serum were abandoned owing to the fragility of the monkey RBCs. His continued ability to maintain his cultures was the result of providing human reticulocytes and 15% human AB serum. Lanners’ work and many other earlier studies used RPMI 1640 as the base of their culture medium. Maintaining P. vivax laboratory as well as Malagasy patient isolate cultures using RPMI 1640 has been very difficult; our those efforts were marked by inconsistent propagation and early termination of cultures (Grimberg and Zimmerman, unpublished observations). Methods from other recent studies have also shown evidence of moving away from this medium (Additional file 3: Table S2). In addition to the use of AIM V medium, the cultures in the present study were supplemented with a lower concentration (10%) of heat-inactivated human AB serum than most other studies (range from 10 to 50%; Additional file 3: Table S2). Finally, the gas mixture used was 10% CO2. AIM V medium formulation is proprietary and has not been disclosed by the manufacturer. However, as mentioned previously, the base medium for AIM V is DMEM (manufacturer’s notes). Since the content of NAHCO3 in the culture medium determines the CO2 concentration for culturing, 10% CO2 was used in the present study (NAHCO3 content in DMEM, 3.7 g/L). In comparison, the NAHCO3 content of RPMI 1640 is 2.0 g/L, therefore 5% CO2 is used.

The preference P. vivax displays for reticulocytes has been demonstrated by both in vivo [52, 54, 55] and in vitro observations [41, 50, 51, 55, 56]. Acknowledging the challenges of P. vivax in vitro culture [40–49], together with previous experience [91], reticulocyte enrichment was investigated. Those efforts included strategies that preferentially lyse older RBCs [92], as well as strategies that separate reticulocytes from older RBCs by centrifugation through Percoll or selection by CD71 positivity [47, 51]. Overall, these methods have produced variable results. The in vitro cultivation method evaluated here has not included reticulocyte enrichment. One reason for not including reticulocyte enrichment was the small volume (2–3 mL [maximum]) of Saimiri blood requested every 2 weeks. Studies that have performed reticulocyte enrichment to culture P. vivax have used larger volumes of blood [44, 50, 56]. Interestingly, the lack of reticulocyte enrichment has not appeared to hamper adaptation of the Malagasy P. vivax isolates to in vitro propagation in Saimiri blood. Saimiri blood contains about 2% reticulocytes [85]. However, it is believed that reticulocyte counts in Saimiri blood, stored at 4 °C, are not available. In the present study, in the leukocyte-depleted Saimiri blood preparations, stored at 4 °C, reticulocyte counts were stable at about 2% over a 2-week period, which is when the fresh blood was obtained. This is in accordance with the results of a study on leukocyte-depleted human blood, stored for 6 weeks under standard blood bank conditions (2–6 °C) [93]. In this study, reticulocyte counts increased at day 21 and remained constant over time. Finally, recent reports have demonstrated a preference of the parasite for young reticulocytes, including that P. vivax Sal-1 rings ex vivo were found in young reticulocytes [56]. However, in this same study, the second generation (20 h in vitro) rings and trophozoites were found in older reticulocytes and mature RBCs [56]. Whether the storage of Saimiri blood, containing reticulocytes, for 2–3 weeks affects the invasion and maturation of the P. vivax isolates remains to be explored. For now, avoiding reticulocyte enrichment has saved considerable time and resources, and appears to simplify maintenance of P. vivax cultures in the present system.

Limitations and future directions

Despite the experience of maintaining in vitro culture of multiple P. vivax isolates from Madagascar in Saimiri RBCs, the focus here on isolate AMP2014.01 encounters some limitations. The authors recognize that they have not performed the same manipulations demonstrated for AMP2014.01 with all of the isolates introduced in this study. Similarly, studying the receptivity of different P. vivax isolates to cryopreservation and onward rounds of in vitro culture will need to be performed. Such studies would further substantiate if the approaches described here are able to successfully contribute to the development of stable parasite strains that are characterized by distinct biological phenotypes from Madagascar and other endemic areas.

Beyond demonstrating the basic capacity of P. vivax in vitro culture in Saimiri RBCs, it will be important to investigate further if this system can be used to characterize the specific factors involved in P. vivax RBC invasion, as has been performed by laboratory-adapted strains of P. falciparum [33, 94, 95]. Therefore, a number of in vitro studies are readily anticipated. These include tests to determine if treatments to manipulate the RBC surface (e.g., trypsin, chymotrypsin, neuraminidase) and antibody reagents interacting with the Duffy blood group and Duffy binding protein affect parasite RBC invasion in predictable ways. Beyond this basic assessment of P. vivax in an in vitro setting, it will be exciting to determine if the methods described here will facilitate a wider range of investigations into the lifecycle of this parasite to include attaining gametocytes, exposure of mosquito hosts to different P. vivax strains, evaluation of liver-stage infection and development of hypnozoites. These studies, as well as analyses of gene expression and genetic manipulation of this parasite would all be facilitated if it is possible to develop stable, laboratory-adapted strains of P. vivax. Finally, investigation of the possible differences in expression/biology of the parasite grown in Saimiri vs. human RBCs would also be facilitated.

Conclusions

Long-term culture of P. vivax is possible in RBCs of Saimiri boliviensis. Past studies have shown that S. boliviensis serves as a receptive in vivo host [57, 66–70]. The studies here introduce an alternative to propagation of P. vivax in live animals, which is becoming more restrictive. In vitro culture of P. vivax in Saimiri RBCs provides new opportunities for investigating the molecular and cellular biology of this important malaria parasite.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

REH, ACR, PAZ, and BTG conceived the study. RKM wrote the first draft of the paper with DB, PAZ, and BTG. REH, SR, and ACR oversaw field activities. TAR, BR, and TF ran field collections. RKM, DB, MHL, and MZB conducted all laboratory assays. RKM, DB, PAZ, and BTG analysed the results. All authors participated in the writing and review of the final document. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all study participants, local health officials, field doctors, and project technicians (Brunette Razanadrazanina, Yvon Ralaiseheno, and Seraphin Randrianjanahary) for their participation and support. Study permission from Association ASA (Ankohonana Sahirana Arenina, http://www.asa-madagascar.org), Madagascar Ministry of Health, and logistical support of Pact Madagascar (http://www.pact-madagascar.org) is also acknowledged. R.K.M. offers his sincere gratitude to his late mentors Drs. B. N. Singh and O. P. Shukla for teaching him how to culture parasitic protozoans.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available on request from the authors.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final manuscript’s submission for publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study’s protocol was approved by the ethical review panels of University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA (DMID Protocol #13-0067); the National Institutes of Health, USA (DMID Protocol 13-0067); and the Ministry of Public Health, Madagascar (No. 099-MSANP/CE). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects, or subject guardians, enrolled into the study. The Madagascar National Malaria Control Programme approved sharing of biological samples with CWRU.

Funding

This study was funded by an NIH Grant (R01 AI097366) to PAZ.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Global Health and Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106-4983, USA
(2)
Oxford Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
(3)
National Malaria Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Antananarivo, Madagascar
(4)
Faculty of Sciences, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar

References

  1. Gething PW, Elyazar IR, Moyes CL, Smith DL, Battle KE, Guerra CA, et al. A long neglected world malaria map: Plasmodium vivax endemicity in 2010. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1814.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Howes RE, Battle KE, Mendis KN, Smith DL, Cibulskis RE, Baird JK, et al. Global epidemiology of Plasmodium vivax. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95:15–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Alving AS, Craige B, Pullman TN, Whorton CM, Jones R, Eichelberger L. Procedures used at Stateville penitentiary for the testing of potential antimalarial agents. J Clin Invest. 1948;27:2–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Chernin E. The malariatherapy of neurosyphilis. J Parasitol. 1984;70:611–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Miller LH, Mason SJ, Clyde DF, McGinniss MH. The resistance factor to Plasmodium vivax in blacks. The Duffy-blood-group genotype, FyFy. N Engl J Med. 1976;295:302–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Payne RO, Griffin PM, McCarthy JS, Draper SJ. Plasmodium vivax controlled human malaria infection—progress and prospects. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33:141–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Snounou G, Perignon JL. Malariotherapy–insanity at the service of malariology. Adv Parasitol. 2013;81:223–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell CC, Collins WE, Chin W, Roberts JM, Broderson JR. Studies of the Sal I strain of Plasmodium vivax in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). J Parasitol. 1983;69:598–601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Herrera S, Perlaza BL, Bonelo A, Arevalo-Herrera M. Aotus monkeys: their great value for anti-malaria vaccines and drug testing. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:1625–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nayar JK, Baker RH, Knight JW, Sullivan JS, Morris CL, Richardson BB, et al. Studies on a primaquine-tolerant strain of Plasmodium vivax from Brazil in Aotus and Saimiri monkeys. J Parasitol. 1997;83:739–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Comfort N. The prisoner as model organism: malaria research at Stateville penitentiary. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2009;40:190–203.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Grimm D. NIH to review its policies on all non-human primate research. In: Scientific Community. Science Magazine. 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Weijer C. Another tuskegee? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:1–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Trager W, Jensen JB. Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science. 1976;193:673–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ball EG, Anfinsen CB, Geiman QM, McKee RW, Ormsbee RA. In vitro growth and multiplication of the malaria parasite, Plasmodium knowlesi. Science. 1945;101:542–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lim C, Hansen E, DeSimone TM, Moreno Y, Junker K, Bei A, et al. Expansion of host cellular niche can drive adaptation of a zoonotic malaria parasite to humans. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1638.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Moon RW, Hall J, Rangkuti F, Ho YS, Almond N, Mitchell GH, et al. Adaptation of the genetically tractable malaria pathogen Plasmodium knowlesi to continuous culture in human erythrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:531–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nguyen-Dinh P, Gardner AL, Campbell CC, Skinner JC, Collins WE. Cultivation in vitro of the vivax-type malaria parasite Plasmodium cynomolgi. Science. 1981;212:1146–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zeeman AM, der Wel AV, Kocken CH. Ex vivo culture of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium cynomolgi and in vitro culture of Plasmodium knowlesi blood stages. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;923:35–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Noulin F, Borlon C, Van Den Abbeele J, D’Alessandro U, Erhart A. 1912–2012: a century of research on Plasmodium vivax in vitro culture. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:286–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Udomsangpetch R, Kaneko O, Chotivanich K, Sattabongkot J. Cultivation of Plasmodium vivax. Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:85–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. de Koning-Ward TF, Gilson PR, Crabb BS. Advances in molecular genetic systems in malaria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:373–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tham WH, Beeson JG, Rayner JC. Plasmodium vivax vaccine research—we’ve only just begun. Int J Parasitol. 2017;47:111–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chin W, Collins WE. Comparative studies of three strains of Plasmodium falciparum isolated by the culture method of Trager and Jensen. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1980;29:1143–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jensen JB, Trager W. Plasmodium falciparum in culture: establishment of additional strains. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;27:743–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Origin of some P. falciparum strains. http://www.m.ehime-u.ac.jp/school/parasitology/eng/Strain1.htm. Accessed 16 June 2017.
  27. Kirkman LA, Su XZ, Wellems TE. Plasmodium falciparum: isolation of large numbers of parasite clones from infected blood samples. Exp Parasitol. 1996;83:147–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sa JM, Twu O, Hayton K, Reyes S, Fay MP, Ringwald P, et al. Geographic patterns of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance distinguished by differential responses to amodiaquine and chloroquine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:18883–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Walliker D, Quakyi IA, Wellems TE, McCutchan TF, Szarfman A, London WT, et al. Genetic analysis of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Science. 1987;236:1661–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wellems TE, Walker-Jonah A, Panton LJ. Genetic mapping of the chloroquine-resistance locus on Plasmodium falciparum chromosome 7. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:3382–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Cowman AF, Crabb BS. Invasion of red blood cells by malaria parasites. Cell. 2006;124:755–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Koch M, Baum J. The mechanics of malaria parasite invasion of the human erythrocyte - towards a reassessment of the host cell contribution. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18:319–29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Weiss GE, Crabb BS, Gilson PR. Overlaying molecular and temporal aspects of malaria parasite invasion. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32:284–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Corey VC, Lukens AK, Istvan ES, Lee MC, Franco V, Magistrado P, et al. A broad analysis of resistance development in the malaria parasite. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11901.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Plouffe DM, Wree M, Du AY, Meister S, Li F, Patra K, et al. High-throughput assay and discovery of small molecules that interrupt malaria transmission. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:114–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Swann J, Corey V, Scherer CA, Kato N, Comer E, Maetani M, et al. High-throughput luciferase-based assay for the discovery of therapeutics that prevent malaria. ACS Infect Dis. 2016;2:281–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Richard D, Kats LM, Langer C, Black CG, Mitri K, Boddey JA, et al. Identification of rhoptry trafficking determinants and evidence for a novel sorting mechanism in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000328.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee MC, Fidock DA. CRISPR-mediated genome editing of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites. Genome Med. 2014;6:63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Singer M, Frischknecht F. Time for genome editing: next-generation attenuated malaria parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2016;33:202–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Bass CC, Johns FM. The cultivation of malarial plasmodia (Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum) in vitro. J Exp Med. 1912;16:567–79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Barnwell JW, Nichols ME, Rubinstein P. In vitro evaluation of the role of the Duffy blood group in erythrocyte invasion by Plasmodium vivax. J Exp Med. 1989;169:1795–802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Borlon C, Russell B, Sriprawat K, Suwanarusk R, Erhart A, Renia L, et al. Cryopreserved Plasmodium vivax and cord blood reticulocytes can be used for invasion and short term culture. Int J Parasitol. 2012;42:155–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Chotivanich K, Silamut K, Udomsangpetch R, Stepniewska KA, Pukrittayakamee S, Looareesuwan S, et al. Ex-vivo short-term culture and developmental assessment of Plasmodium vivax. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95:677–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Golenda CF, Li J, Rosenberg R. Continuous in vitro propagation of the malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:6786–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Lanners HN. Prolonged in vitro cultivation of Plasmodium vivax using Trager’s continuous-flow method. Parasitol Res. 1992;78:699–701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Nichols ME, Rubinstein P, Barnwell J, de Cordoba RS, Rosenfield RE. A new human Duffy blood group specificity defined by a murine monoclonal antibody Immunogenetics and association with susceptibility to Plasmodium vivax. J Exp Med. 1987;166:776–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Russell B, Suwanarusk R, Borlon C, Costa FT, Chu CS, Rijken MJ, et al. A reliable ex vivo invasion assay of human reticulocytes by Plasmodium vivax. Blood. 2011;118:e74–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh G, Urhekar AD, Singh R. In vitro cultivation of Plasmodium vivax using McCoy’s medium. Asian J Med Pharm Res. 2015;5:18–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Udomsangpetch R, Somsri S, Panichakul T, Chotivanich K, Sirichaisinthop J, Yang Z, et al. Short-term in vitro culture of field isolates of Plasmodium vivax using umbilical cord blood. Parasitol Int. 2007;56:65–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Roobsoong W, Tharinjaroen CS, Rachaphaew N, Chobson P, Schofield L, Cui L, et al. Improvement of culture conditions for long-term in vitro culture of Plasmodium vivax. Malar J. 2015;14:297.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Cho JS, Russell B, Kosasaivee V, Zhang R, Colin Y, Bertrand O, et al. Unambiguous determination of Plasmodium vivax reticulocyte invasion by flow cytometry. Int J Parasitol. 2016;46:31–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kitchen SF. The infection of reticulocytes by Plasmodium vivax. Am J Trop Med. 1938;18:347–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Panichakul T, Sattabongkot J, Chotivanich K, Sirichaisinthop J, Cui L, Udomsangpetch R. Production of erythropoietic cells in vitro for continuous culture of Plasmodium vivax. Int J Parasitol. 2007;37:1551–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lim C, Pereira L, Saliba KS, Mascarenhas A, Maki JN, Chery L, et al. Reticulocyte preference and stage development of Plasmodium vivax isolates. J Infect Dis. 2016;214:1081–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Mons B. Preferential invasion of malarial merozoites into young red blood cells. Blood Cells. 1990;16:299–312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Shaw-Saliba K, Thomson-Luque R, Obaldia N 3rd, Nunez M, Dutary S, Lim C, et al. Insights into an optimization of Plasmodium vivax Sal-1 in vitro culture: the Aotus primate model. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004870.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Anderson DC, Lapp SA, Akinyi S, Meyer EV, Barnwell JW, Korir-Morrison C, et al. Plasmodium vivax trophozoite-stage proteomes. J Proteom. 2015;115:157–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Anderson DC, Lapp SA, Barnwell JW, Galinski MR. A large scale Plasmodium vivax-Saimiri boliviensis trophozoite-schizont transition proteome. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0182561.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Kosaisavee V, Suwanarusk R, Chua ACY, Kyle DE, Malleret B, Zhang R, et al. Strict tropism for CD71 +/CD234 + human reticulocytes limits the zoonotic potential of Plasmodium cynomolgi. Blood. 2017;130:1357–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Kaiser J. NIH to end all support for chimpanzee research. In: Policy. Science magazine. 2015.Google Scholar
  61. Lankau EW, Turner PV, Mullan RJ, Galland GG. Use of non-human primates in research in North America. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2014;53:278–82.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. National Institutes of Health. NIH workshop on ensuring the continued responsible oversight of research with non-human primates. 2016. p. 1–31.Google Scholar
  63. Menard D, Barnadas C, Bouchier C, Henry-Halldin C, Gray LR, Ratsimbasoa A, et al. Plasmodium vivax clinical malaria is commonly observed in Duffy-negative Malagasy people. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:5967–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Hester J, Chan ER, Menard D, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Barnwell J, Zimmerman PA, et al. De novo assembly of a field isolate genome reveals novel Plasmodium vivax erythrocyte invasion genes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2569.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Menard D, Chan ER, Benedet C, Ratsimbasoa A, Kim S, Chim P, et al. Whole genome sequencing of field isolates reveals a common duplication of the Duffy binding protein gene in Malagasy Plasmodium vivax strains. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2489.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Collins WE, Skinner JC, Pappaioanou M, Broderson JR, McClure HM, Strobert E, et al. Chesson strain Plasmodium vivax in Saimiri sciureus boliviensis monkeys. J Parasitol. 1987;73:929–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Collins WE, Skinner JC, Pappaioanou M, Broderson JR, Filipski VK, McClure HM, et al. Sporozoite-induced infections of the Salvador I strain of Plasmodium vivax in Saimiri sciureus boliviensis monkeys. J Parasitol. 1988;74:582–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Collins WE, Morris CL, Richardson BB, Sullivan JS, Galland GG. Further studies on the sporozoite transmission of the Salvador I strain of Plasmodium vivax. J Parasitol. 1994;80:512–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Collins WE, Sullivan JS, Galland GG, Williams A, Nace D, Williams T, et al. Plasmodium simium and Saimiri boliviensis as a model system for testing candidate vaccines against Plasmodium vivax. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:644–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Galinski MR, Meyer EV, Barnwell JW. Plasmodium vivax: modern strategies to study a persistent parasite’s life cycle. Adv Parasitol. 2013;81:1–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Howes RE, Mioramalala SA, Ramiranirina B, Franchard T, Rakotorahalahy AJ, Zimmerman PA, et al. Contemporary epidemiological overview of malaria in Madagascar: operational utility of reported routine case data for malaria control planning. Malar J. 2016;15:502.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Howes RE, Chan ER, Rakotomanga TA, Schulte ST, Gibson J, Zikrush M, et al. Prevalence and genetic variants of G6PD deficiency among two Malagasy populations living in Plasmodium vivax-endemic areas. Malar J. 2017;16:139.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. National Malaria Control Programme of Madagascar. Plan stratégique de lutte contre le paludisme Madagascar 2013-2017. Consolider les acquis en vue de l’élimination du paludisme à Madagascar. Version revisée pour 2015–2017. 2015.Google Scholar
  74. Normark J. Freezing of patient isolates and strains with glycerolyte. In: Moll K, Ljungström I, Perlmann H, Scherf A, Wahlgren M. Manassas VA, editors. Methods in Malaria Research. 5th edition. Malaria Research and Reference Reagent Resource Center, American Type Culture Collection; 2008. p. 14.Google Scholar
  75. Haas GP, Solomon D, Rosenberg SA. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from nonrenal urological malignancies. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1990;30:342–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Nomura K. Fujioka T [Study of adoptive immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells and interleukin-2. II. Clinical evaluation. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1993;84:831–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Nomura K. Fujioka T [Study of adoptive immunotherapy with lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells and interleukin-2 for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. I. Generation of LAK cells by incubation in serum-free medium]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1993;84:822–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Helinski EH, Bielat KL, Ovak GM, Pauly JL. Long-term cultivation of functional human macrophages in Teflon dishes with serum-free media. J Leukoc Biol. 1988;44:111–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Causey AL, Wooten RM, Clem LW, Bly JE. A serum-free medium for human primary T lymphocyte culture. J Immunol Methods. 1994;175:115–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Kaldjian EP, Chen GH, Cease KB. Enhancement of lymphocyte proliferation assays by use of serum-free medium. J Immunol Methods. 1992;147:189–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Blomqvist K. Thawing of glycerolyte-frozen parasites with NaCl. In: Moll K, Ljungström I, Perlmann H, Scherf A, Wahlgren M. Manassas VA, editors. Methods in Malaria Research. 5th edition. Malaria Research and Reference Reagent Resource Center, American Type Culture Collection. 2008. p. 15.Google Scholar
  82. Grimberg BT, Erickson JJ, Sramkoski RM, Jacobberger JW, Zimmerman PA. Monitoring Plasmodium falciparum growth and development by UV flow cytometry using an optimized Hoechst-thiazole orange staining strategy. Cytometry A. 2008;73:546–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  83. McNamara DT, Kasehagen LJ, Grimberg BT, Cole-Tobian J, Collins WE, Zimmerman PA. Diagnosing infection levels of four human malaria parasite species by a polymerase chain reaction/ligase detection reaction fluorescent microsphere-based assay. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:413–21.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Moon SU, Na BK, Kang JM, Kim JY, Cho SH, Park YK, et al. Genetic polymorphism and effect of natural selection at domain I of apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) in Plasmodium vivax isolates from Myanmar. Acta Trop. 2010;114:71–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Matsuzawa T, Nagai Y. Comparative hematological and plasma chemistry values in purpose-bred squirrel, cynomolgus and rhesus-monkeys. Comp Haematol Int. 1994;4:43–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Grimberg BT. Methodology and application of flow cytometry for investigation of human malaria parasites. J Immunol Methods. 2011;367:1–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Ratovonjato J, Randrianarivelojosia M, Rakotondrainibe ME, Raharimanga V, Andrianaivolambo L, Le Goff G, et al. Entomological and parasitological impacts of indoor residual spraying with DDT, alphacypermethrin and deltamethrin in the western foothill area of Madagascar. Malar J. 2014;13:21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Lanners HN. Ultrastructure of erythrocytes from Aotus trivirgatus and Saimiri sciureus monkeys infected by Plasmodium vivax. Parasitol Res. 1991;77:395–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Furuya T, Sa JM, Chitnis CE, Wellems TE, Stedman TT. Reticulocytes from cryopreserved erythroblasts support Plasmodium vivax infection in vitro. Parasitol Int. 2014;63:278–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Mons B, Collins WE, Skinner JC, van der Star W, Croon JJ, van der Kaay HJ. Plasmodium vivax: in vitro growth and reinvasion in red blood cells of Aotus nancymai. Exp Parasitol. 1988;66:183–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Grimberg BT, Udomsangpetch R, Xainli J, McHenry A, Panichakul T, Sattabongkot J, et al. Plasmodium vivax invasion of human erythrocytes inhibited by antibodies directed against the Duffy binding protein. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e337.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Grimberg BT, Scheetz EA, Erickson JJ, Bales JM, David M, Daum-Woods K, et al. Increased reticulocyte count from cord blood samples using hypotonic lysis. Exp Parasitol. 2012;132:304–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Nogueira D, Rocha S, Abreu E, Costa E, Santos-Silva A. Biochemical and cellular changes in leukocyte-depleted red blood cells stored for transfusion. Transfus Med Hemother. 2015;42:46–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Dvorak JA, Miller LH, Whitehouse WC, Shiroishi T. Invasion of erythrocytes by malaria merozoites. Science. 1975;187:748–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Gilson PR, Crabb BS. Morphology and kinetics of the three distinct phases of red blood cell invasion by Plasmodium falciparum merozoites. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39:91–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us