Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Strategy to improve malaria surveillance system preventing transfusion-transmitted malaria in blood banks using molecular diagnostic

  • 1, 2,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 5Email authorView ORCID ID profile and
  • 1
Malaria Journal201817:344

  • Received: 11 July 2018
  • Accepted: 19 September 2018
  • Published:



Malaria can be transmitted by blood transfusion through donations collected from asymptomatic or parasitic donors. The parasites are released into the bloodstream during its life cycle and will therefore be present in donated blood by infected individuals. All cases of transfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM) notified since 2005 in Brazil were fatal. A good screening tool for Plasmodium spp. detection in blood units must have a high detection threshold, and the prevention of TTM relies entirely on the exclusion of potentially infected donors. However, in Brazilian blood banks, the screening test relies on blood thick smears examination.


The molecular diagnostic based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) using real time PCR (mt-qPCR) was improved to detect Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, and standardized for use in Plasmodium malariae. The analytic sensitivity of this mt-qPCR methodology was performed using a sample of P. vivax.


The mt-qPCR was highly efficient, and the analytic sensitivity for P. vivax was determined (0.000006 parasites/µL). This method was tested to detect P. vivax and P. falciparum in individuals from two malaria-endemic areas in Brazil, Amazon region (Pará and Rondônia states), the samples were collected in 10 reference units of two blood banks (Pará/nine cities and Rondônia/Porto Velho), and parasites mtDNA were detected in 10 of 2224 potential blood donors (0.45%). In all 10 positive samples, only P. vivax was detected.


Molecular diagnostic using mt-qPCR was effective in revealing infected potential donors with good perspectives to be applied as screening routine of asymptomatic carriers for preventing transfusion-transmitted malaria in blood banks.


  • Malaria
  • Molecular diagnostic
  • Blood donors
  • Transfusion-transmitted malaria
  • Hemovigilance
  • mt-qPCR


Malaria is an infectious disease caused by parasites of the Plasmodium genus. In addition to being primarily transmitted by bites of female mosquitoes of Anopheles species, malaria is readily transmitted by blood transfusion through donations collected from asymptomatic or parasitic donors, especially those individuals with low parasite densities [14]. The parasite is released into the bloodstream during its life cycle and will therefore be present in blood donated by infected individuals [57].

The erythrocyte concentrate is the main blood component involved in transfusion-transmitted malaria (TTM), but there are reports of transmission by fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate and platelets concentrate. When preserved in blood units, the parasite remains viable for a long period of time, even after storage. After transfusion, the disease begins in a matter of days or weeks, with severe and often fatal evolution, especially in immunodepressed individuals, young children, pregnant women, and people who have never been exposed to malaria parasites [6, 7].

Haemovigilance is required to identify and prevent the occurrence or recurrence of unwanted transfusion-related transmissions and to increase the safety, efficacy and efficiency of blood transfusions [8]. This vigilance system should include the monitoring of malaria in endemic areas, such as Africa, South America and some areas in Asia, to detect the five species of the Plasmodium genus that infect humans, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium knowlesi [2, 9].

Malaria transmitted by blood transfusions has been described since the early 1900s. The first report on malaria as a consequence of an artery-to-vein blood transfusion was described in 1910 by Woolsey [5, 10]. However, the first case of TTM following the use of stored blood was described in 1941, and 1756 cases were reported in 49 countries between the years 1950 and 1972 [1]. In the last 40 years, the increased frequency of blood transfusion in medical practice and increase in travelling between countries in which malaria is absent and those where malaria is endemic reveals a clinical and public health problem [4, 8]. Moreover, the urbanization of malaria transmission areas in countries where the disease is endemic has contributed to an increased possibility of accidental transmission of Plasmodium infections through blood transfusion [11]. However, there is a paucity of officially registered data, which depends on appropriate tools for detection of malaria parasites.

An accurate diagnosis of Plasmodium infections is essential for malaria control or eradication [2, 9, 12]. Examination of thick blood smears is performed to detect positivity for Plasmodium, but this test has limited sensitivity to detect asymptomatic infections with low parasitaemia [13]. The lack of precise malaria diagnosis remains an important obstacle that limits the prompt detection and identification of Plasmodium species in the case of individuals with low parasitaemia [14].

In this context, for the first time, an innovative strategy was developed to detect the malaria parasites based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of malaria parasites, P. falciparum and P. vivax [15]. Efforts have been done to develop tools for disease control, especially to prevent TTM, by reporting the real possibility of transmission and the frequencies of contaminated samples from blood donors who resided in a large urban area within the malaria-endemic region [16]. After development and application of this novel method, other studies have reported the use of mtDNA for malaria diagnosis by nested PCR [1721] or loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [22, 23], thereby confirming the relevance of this innovative strategy of using mtDNA as a marker for malaria diagnostic tests [15].

Historically, the conventional malaria control has mostly taken aim at P. falciparum, and even its aggressive implementation has few lasting impacts upon endemic P. vivax [9, 12]. In part, it occurs because this resilient species requires multiple fronts of attack, which include the asymptomatic and sub-patent reservoirs [24, 25]. In general, transfusion malaria is not registered by national authorities. Since 2002, the official data reported only 4 cases transmitted by transfusions from the blood banks located in the Brazilian malaria-endemic area [11].

In Brazil, malaria is endemic in the Amazon region, where P. vivax is the main species. In the past two decades, the numbers of malaria cases caused by this parasite have varied between 100,000 and 500,000 per year, representing approximately 85% of all reported cases [26, 27]. Because P. vivax is able to develop latency stages (hypnozoites) in the liver, which leads to relapses, and its life cycle occurs inside the reticulocytes, these factors may contribute to an increase in the number of individuals with low parasite load, which are not usually detected by healthcare facilities [24, 25]. Moreover, in this endemic area, a high prevalence of asymptomatic Plasmodium infection has been reported [28]. This is an aspect that can lead to uncommon ways of transmission, such as TTM [1, 2].

In this study, the performance of molecular approach was improved for detection of malaria parasites via mitochondrial DNA as a careful screening test of blood samples from donors, and compared the more sensitive molecular technique with those used in haemovigilance as the best strategies for detecting P. falciparum, P. vivax and P. malariae. In addition, for the P. vivax parasite, the prevalence of positive samples was determined as units for TTM occurrence upon the transfusion of blood or its components from infected donors living in malaria-endemic urban areas in Brazil.


Sample selection

Positive samples of P. vivax (22,000 parasites/µL) and P. malariae (400 parasites/µL) were obtained from patients with malaria. The positive sample of the 3D7 strain of P. falciparum was provided by the Evandro Chagas Institute/Ministry of health, Brazil. Samples of potential donors were collected in two blood bank centres. Among them, 1324 were obtained from nine reference units of the Fundação Centro de Hemoterapia e Hematologia do Estado do Pará (HEMOPA) and 900 were collected from blood donors in Porto Velho, the capital of the state of Rondônia. In samples collected in the state of Pará, the frequency of malaria parasites in potential donors was analysed according to age and annual parasite index (API), the gender ratio was approximately 4 males to 1 female.

DNA extraction, quantification and mt-qPCR

DNA samples were extracted from 150 µL blood by phenol/chloroform followed by ethanol precipitation method, with modifications [29]. Then, DNA was quantified on NanoDrop™ ND 1000 (Uniscience), in 260 nm to 280 nm wavelength range and final concentration was adjusted to 100 ng/µL.

A qPCR was performed to determine the presence and absence of the malaria parasite mtDNA, based on primer extension and posterior hybridization with TaqMan probes on ABI Prism 7.500 sequence detection system (Life Technologies, CA, USA) version 2.0.6 software, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The probes were designed as described by Batista-dos-Santos et al. [16], targeting the Cytochrome C Oxidase gene (COX) in control samples of three species of Plasmodium evaluated in this study. The probes identified the species P. falciparum (COX III—access n. GI8346992 and M76611), P. vivax (COX I—access n. GI63022502). The qPCR assay amplified mtDNA which was a part of the sequence generated by the primers as published by Cunha et al. [15], and P. malariae (COX I—access n. KC175322.1), 3 different qPCR assays were performed.

As negative control, ultra-pure water previously tested for mitochondrial qPCR (mt-qPCR) was employed and a molecule of template DNA was used as endogenous positive control.

Evaluation of the detection threshold of mt-qPCR for Plasmodium vivax

Evaluation of analytic sensitivity of the mt-qPCR methodology was performed using a sample of P. vivax previously evaluated and quantified. For this, a serial dilution was performed in ultra-pure water (DF 10) until the concentration of 1:100,000, in triplicate, as previously described by Gama et al. [30], using serial dilution for genomic DNA (dDNA). It was adapted for mitochondrial DNA, hence the results are sub-represented considering that the copy number of the mitochondrial genome is estimated in an interval of 20–150 copies [31, 32].

The aliquot of 150 µL of blood was withdrawn from the sample containing 200 parasites/mm3. After extraction, the pellet was precipitated in a volume of 50 µL (~ 600 parasites/µL). In addition, the solution was diluted to 1:1000 in ultra-pure water, which corresponded to approximately ~ 0.6 parasites/µL.


Comparison of the mt-qPCR reactions to detect Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax

Initially, mt-qPCR was standardized to detect P. malariae, and the detection threshold was determined in comparison with P. falciparum and P. vivax using this molecular diagnosis. The amount of amplicon obtained by the amplification of mtDNA from malaria parasites showed variability according to the parasitaemia density of each Plasmodium species tested. This assay showed good reproducibility when tested for all three dilutions of each sample (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Comparison of the mt-qPCR reactions to detect Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. The amount of amplicons obtained from amplification of mtDNA from malaria parasites showed variability according to the parasitaemia density of each Plasmodium species tested. The DNA dilutions tested were 1:100, 1:1000 and 1:10,000. P. malariae (blue), P. vivax (purple) and P. falciparum (green)

Determination of the detection threshold of the mt-qPCR for molecular diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax

For P. vivax sample, the detection threshold was estimated by analysing the blood collected from an infected individual. The parasitaemia was determined by the thick blood smear technique (200 parasites/µL). The serial dilutions were established as follows: (i) the first solution contained the equivalent of 0.6 parasites/μL; (ii) the second solution contained 0.06 parasites/μL; (iii) the third solution had 0.006 parasites/μL; (iv) the fourth solution had 0.0006 parasites/μL; (v) the fifth solution had 0.00006 parasites/μL; and, (vi) the sixth solution contained 0.000006 parasites/μL (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Determination of the Plasmodium vivax detection threshold by mt-qPCR. Serial dilutions were performed using 1.0 μL of the DNA solution (~ 0.6 parasites/μL) for obtained serial dilutions in ratio 10, with dilutions equivalent from 0.6 to 0.000006 parasites/μL. The same volume of each dilution was tested in triplicate to estimate the analytical sensitivity

The technique of amplification by mitochondrial qPCR was able to detect P. vivax mtDNA at all dilutions, even in the most diluted sample corresponding to 0.000006 parasites/µL (with CT of 38). The detection thresholds for the P. falciparum and P. malariae species were not determined.

Percentages of positive samples from blood donors identified by qPCR detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax mtDNA

A total of 2224 samples collected from blood donors were tested by molecular diagnosis using mt-qPCR. All participants were permanent residents of two different states in the Brazilian Amazon region. Of these, 1324 were collected from different blood banks of the state of Pará, and 900 were from blood donors from Porto Velho, the capital of the state of Rondônia. Malaria parasites were detected in 10 of 2224 blood donors (0.45%). In all 10 positive samples, only P. vivax mtDNA was detected. The distribution of blood donors by city and the prevalence of detected malaria parasites is shown in Table 1. The positivity for Plasmodium was observed in only 3 blood banks, and the numbers of positive samples were 5, 3 and 2 for those collected in Abaetetuba (Pará), Santarém (Pará) and Porto Velho (Rondônia), respectively. Regarding samples collected in Porto Velho, P. vivax was detected using both molecular diagnostic methods (mtDNA and 18S rRNA). The percentage of positive samples was 3.0, 1.5 and 0.2% for the Abaetetuba, Santarém and Porto Velho donor groups, respectively. All tested samples were negative for P. falciparum.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the samples collected in blood banks of the Brazilian Amazon region and exposure to P. vivax and P. falciparum detected by molecular diagnosis

Blood banks located in Pará and Rondônia state


Age in years, median (range)

Males, %


mt-qPCR positive N (%)

P. falciparum

P. vivax



32 (18–59)


0.7 (low)

0 (0)

0 (0)



31 (19–59)


0.4 (low)

0 (0)

0 (0)



30 (18–65)


5.9 (low)

0 (0)

0 (0)



34 (20–60)


3.1 (low)

0 (0)

3 (1.5)



30 (19–62)


0.9 (low)

0 (0)

5 (3.0)



34 (20–58)


0.15 (low)

0 (0)

0 (0)



28 (19–60)


0.5 (low)

0 (0)

0 (0)



32 (18–65)


35.6 (medium)

0 (0)

0 (0)



26 (18–59)


22.7 (medium)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Porto Velho–Rondôniac




54.3 (high)

0 (0)

2 (0.2)

All samples


30 (18–65)


0 (0)

10 (0.45)

NA not available

aAnnual Parasite Index at the year of the survey with the respective classifications (low, medium or high) as reported by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (

bAll donors from Pará state were selected to donation

cAmong all samples collected in Rondônia state, only two were positive for P. vivax by molecular screening, 700 were approved as donors and 200 were excluded, all of them were tested in both molecular methods, the nested polymerase chain reaction (nested-PCR) for amplification of the 18S RNA and the real time PCR (qPCR) to amplify the parasites mtDNA


TTM is recognized in many countries where malaria transmission has been eliminated [6]. Although the frequency of this route of transmission is very low in non-endemic malaria areas, it is a substantial problem that involves the risk of receiving a unit of erythrocyte concentrate contaminated with parasites [7, 33]. Transfusion-associated cases of malaria have been reported in many parts of the world, including the USA [1, 3, 34], Canada [35], Spain [36], England [37], and France [38], Therefore, it should be noted that TTM may be implicated in the reintroduction of malaria into areas where it had previously been eradicated.

Conversely, the risk of transmitting malaria by blood transfusion in countries where parasite transmission is endemic can be high, and the healthcare systems clearly need alternative measures to prevented TTM, including tools for detecting the parasite or its components in the blood of potentially infected donors [2, 7, 11].

Although the exact numbers are unknown, the frequency of TTM has been estimated as 1 case per 4 million units donated in non-endemic areas [36, 37]. Moreover, it is worth considering that in the malaria-endemic areas, it is a health problem as reported for Africa [7, 39, 40], Asia [41] and South America, including Brazil, where infected donors were detected in 2 studies that used different molecular approaches to test samples collected in blood banks located in the Amazon region [16, 42]. Besides, TTM is a disease with a high lethality rate: all cases notified in Brazil since 2005 were fatal [43].

Malaria screening is mandatory in endemic regions and the directives of the Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) and the Brazilian Ministry of Health require high sensitivity tests. In spite of this, malaria screening in Brazilian blood banks relies on questionnaire data followed by microscopic examination of thick smears, which has several limitations, such as low counts of parasitaemia in asymptomatic patients which may lead to liability to human error [11].

In this study there was an improvement in the methodology developed by Cunha et al., which originally used a strategy based on mtDNA to amplify specific sequences of the Cytochrome C Oxidase genes, such as COXIII and COXI for P. falciparum and P. vivax, respectively. The conventional PCR methodology was changed to a more sensitive and semi-automated technique using one-step qPCR and the same mtDNA sequences. Additionally, mt-qPCR specific to P. malariae was standardized. The conventional PCR identified small amplicons of 273 pb (P. falciparum) and 290 pb (P. vivax) [15] allowing the parasite mtDNA amplification in a shorter time than in the classic nested-PCR based on ribosomal RNA, which has been used for molecular diagnosis of malaria over the past two decades [44].

This new methodology was applied for the detection of 3 Plasmodium species (P. falciparum, P. vivax, and P. malariae) more frequently found as the infecting agents among the 5 species that cause human malaria. The results confirmed that potentially infected volunteers can be among the donors. Although the frequency was low, it represents an even more complicated issue considering that each donation can be distributed over erythrocyte concentrates, platelet concentrates, or serum or plasma/platelets concentrates. Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax tests were included, but only samples infected with P. vivax were detected. This can be explained by the fact that this is an area of higher incidence of P. vivax. It is well-characterized as an endemic area where P. vivax causes approximately 85% of malaria episodes registered by the Brazilian Health System [26, 27].

Another contribution was the qPCR designed specifically for detecting mtDNA of P. malariae. This innovative approach, although only preliminarily tested one positive sample, proved to be a suitable screening tool for identification of infected patients. The detection threshold curve varied depending on the infecting species. This suggests that P. malariae, which frequently occur in low parasitaemia, can also be detected by mt-qPCR. Future studies may be conducted to validate this assay in a cross-sectional study. In Brazil, it is necessary because there are certain issues with the transmission of P. malariae that need to be addressed, which include a high prevalence of P. malariae infections in the Brazilian Amazon endemic area [45], as well as a case of TTM after a transfusion of blood donated by an asymptomatic donor infected with this parasite [46]. In both studies, nested-PCR detecting rRNA was used for diagnosis.

The major advantage of using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in malaria diagnosis as originally reported [15] is the largest copy number/cell of the parasite mitochondrial genome, from 20 to 150 copies/parasite [18, 31, 32]. The potentially infectious parasitaemia is largely variable in TTM cases. An estimated value is 10 parasites/unit in 250 mL of erythrocyte concentrate. In this case, a molecular diagnostic method to provide a trustworthy analysis should have a very low parasite detection threshold [33].

Another important point to be considered is the volume of blood needed to obtain the DNA, since the amount of processed specimen determines the limit of detection [33]. Some questions have been raised regarding the volume of blood that should be tested because only a small part of the donor’s total blood volume, which will be transferred to the recipient individual, is included in the molecular analysis. Hence, different concentrations of DNA obtained from P. vivax-infected patients were tested, and the estimated detection threshold was very low (0.000006 parasites/µL) when compared to the detection threshold of the nested PCR (0.004 parasites/µL) [36].

Two research groups discussed this issue and proposed a hypothetical detection threshold, using calculations that offered the hypothetical value as the threshold [33, 36]. Thus, a threshold could be established corresponding to the probability that analysis of a very small volume of the whole blood bag produces a reliable result that may serve as the basis for a conclusion regarding whether the screening could be positive in very low parasitaemia. The qPCR using mtDNA as template for identification of P. vivax proved that it was possible to reach the hypothetical detection threshold to detect parasitaemias as low as 2.2 × 10−6 parasites/µL, as described by Hänscheid et al. [33] in a commentary on the use of PCR for screening blood donors tested by Benito and Rubio [36]. Our tests showed that mt-qPCR detected P. vivax at 2.4 × 10−5 parasites/4 µL (6.0 × 10−6 parasites/µL) density by analysing DNA from a suitable blood volume, thus achieving analytical sensitivity very close to the value estimated almost two decades ago [33], that is, before the routine use of more sensitive molecular techniques such as real-time PCR.

Malaria induced by blood transfusions from asymptomatic carriers is a relevant problem of haemovigilance. A review of the duration of P. falciparum infections has illustrated how these infections have been studied for decades, and based on the data from these studies, it is possible to suggest that for blood transfusion-transmitted malaria, the inoculum should contain approximately 1000 parasites in a blood bag or bottle of approximately 500 mL. Thus, the transmission density approached an average of 2 parasites/mL [5]. A appropriate screening tool for malaria detection in blood units must have a high sensitivity [33]. It must allow the reduction of TTM risk as well as that of falsely deferred blood donors.

Finally, this analysis proved that it was possible to considerably improve the assay to detect the parasite mtDNA, compared to conventional PCR, where the detection threshold was 0.01 parasites/µL [15]. Using mt-qPCR, the achieved threshold was substantially lower, 0.000006 parasites/µL. This confirms the high efficiency of this methodology to detect parasite mtDNA (P. vivax) analysing only 150 µL out of a total of approximately 450 mL of blood.

Prevention of TTM relies entirely on the exclusion of potentially infected donors. However, it can be very difficult since in many cases, the donor screening process is not efficient and fails to obtain accurate information on previous exposure to malaria and identification of the infected donors. It represents a situation that can particularly occur for donors in blood banks of endemic-malaria areas [7, 11, 39].

Analysing the frequency of positive donor detection by molecular diagnostic tools for samples from blood banks from the malaria-endemic area in Brazil, it was identified only two studies up until the present that determined the prevalence of positive samples of Plasmodium species among donors that live in the Amazon region, which varies from 1 to 3%. Both studies included samples collected from donors of the blood banks of the Belém city, and the prevalence observed was similar, 1.34% [16] and 1% [42]. It should also be noted that in these studies with blood bank samples, it was only detected positives for a single species, P. vivax [16], while others reported mixed infection [42]. It can be suggested that mt-qPCR provides a more specific amplification. In a malaria-free area, a non-endemic state located outside the Amazon region, cases of positive samples from blood donors were registered [47]. This motivates an intense discussion that involves technical and epidemiological aspects and exposes how important it is to provide more accurate data, as well as to provide new highly sensitive tools for better explanations of this situation [4749].

A suitable screening tool for malaria detection in blood units must have high sensitivity and specificity; it must be fast and reduce the risk of TTM [2, 4]. Considering the limitations of the thick blood smear as a screening method in blood banks, it is suggested that the cost-effectiveness of introducing a molecular diagnostic tool for Plasmodium species in the blood banks of endemic areas or in micro-regions should be evaluated in addition to the possibility of reducing the risks of TTM. Malaria diagnostic research provides a basis for applied advances in malaria surveillance [9, 1315]. For this, the laboratorial blood screening can be a critical point in malaria eradication. In the case of TTM, one aspect that must be considered is the low parasitaemia of infected donors.


In conclusion, qPCR is efficient for malaria molecular diagnostics, presenting promising results with good analytic sensitivity. It is a fast and easy molecular methodology to detect mtDNA of the three most frequent malaria parasites, presenting a potential for large-scale use in the prevention of transfusion-transmitted malaria by screening for potential donors as part of malaria haemovigilance in blood banks.


Authors’ contributions

MGC and ARS: Conceive and design of the mtDNA-qPCR, data analyses and writing of the manuscript. SABS: Participated in the process of blood sample collection (Pará state) and performed laboratory work by qPCRs and data analysis. DRCF: participated in the process of blood sample collection (Rondônia state) and performed laboratory work for these samples by Nested-PCR protocol to detect rRNA. MR, GFC: Performed laboratory work (Extraction of DNA and molecular diagnostic by qPCRs). ACF, MMP: P. falciparum Dd2 clone and some reagents. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


The authors would like to thank the Fundação de Hemoterapia do Estado do Pará (HEMOPA), the study participants and the healthcare professionals who work in this foundation for their assistance in the sample collection process.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This project was approved by Ethical Committee of the 028/2009—Universidade de Brasília, for the human subject protocol. Our study was performed in accordance with The Declaration of Helsinki and The Nuremberg Code, obeying the rules for medical research involving human subjects of the National Health Council and ethical principles. All participants gave written informed consent prior to entering the study.


This study was funded fully or partially with funds from FAPESPA/VALE (Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas and VALE) and UFPA (Universidade Federal do Pará) under grant number ICAAF 070/2010 and FAPESPA/PPSUS ICAAF 182/2012 coordinated by MGC; and CAPES (Coordenacão de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) and UFPA—Rede de Pesquisa em Genomica Populacional Humana (RPGPH)-051/2013 coordinated by ARS. ARS is supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico/CNPq/Productivity 304413/2015-1). The funders had no role in the design of the study, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or writing of the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Laboratório de Genética Humana e Médica, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, CEP: 66075-110, Brazil
Fundação Centro de Hemoterapia e Hematologia do Pará, Belém, Pará, CEP: 660033-000, Brazil
Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasília, CEP: 70910-900, Brazil
Instituto Evandro Chagas, Ananindeua, Pará, CEP: 66087-082, Brazil
Laboratório de Microbiologia e Imunologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, CEP: 66075-110, Brazil


  1. Bruce-Chwatt LJ. Transfusion malaria. Bull World Health Organ. 1974;50:337–46.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization. Screening donated blood for transfusion-transmissible infections: recommendations. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Mungai M, Tegtmeier G, Chamberland M, Parise M. Transfusion-transmitted malaria in the United States from 1963 through 1999. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1973–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kitchen AD, Chiodini PL. Malaria and blood transfusion. Vox Sang. 2006;90:77–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashley EA, White NJ. The duration of Plasmodium falciparum infections. Malar J. 2014;13:500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Verra F, Angheben A, Martello E, Giorli G, Perandin F, Bisof Z. A systematic review of transfusion-transmitted malaria in non-endemic areas. Malar J. 2018;17:36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Nansseu JRN, Noubiap JJN, Ndoula STN, Zeh AFM, Monameles CG. What is the best strategy for the prevention of transfusion-transmitted malaria in sub-Saharan African countries where malaria is endemic? Malar J. 2013;12:465.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jain A, Kaur R. Hemovigilance and blood safety. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2012;6:137–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenwood BM, Fidock DA, Kyle DE, Kappe SHI, Alonso PL, Collins FH, Duffy PE. Malaria: progress, perils, and prospects for eradication. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1266–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Woolsey G. Transfusion for pernicious anemia. Two cases. Ann Surg. 1911;5:3.Google Scholar
  11. Freitas DRC, Duarte EC. Normative evaluation of blood banks in the Brazilian Amazon region in respect to the prevention of transfusion-transmitted malaria. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2014;36:394–402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. WHO. Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Coleman RE, Maneechai N, Rachaphaew N, Kumpitak C, Miller RS, Soyseng V, et al. Comparison of field and expert laboratory microscopy for active surveillance for asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in western Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:141–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ochola LB, Vounatsou P, Smith T, Mabaso MLH, Newton CRJC. The reliability of diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis and management of malaria in the absence of a gold standard. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:582–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunha MG, Medina TS, Oliveira SG, Marinho AN, Póvoa MM, Ribeiro-dos-Santos AKC. Development of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method based on amplification of mitochondrial DNA to detect Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. Acta Trop. 2009;111:35–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Batista-dos-Santos S, Raiol M, Santos S, Cunha MG, Ribeiro-dos-Santos A. Real-time PCR diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax among blood donors. Malar J. 2012;11:345.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Bourgeois N, Boutet A, Bousquet PJ, Basset D, Douard-Enault C, Charachon S, et al. Comparison of three real-time PCR methods with blood smears and rapid diagnostic test in Plasmodium sp. infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:1305–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Putaporntip C, Buppan P, Jongwutiwes S. Improved performance with saliva and urine as alternative DNA sources for malaria diagnosis by mitochondrial DNA-based PCR assays. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:1484–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Haanshuus CG, Mohn SC, Morch K, Langeland N, Blomberg B, Hanevik K. A novel, single-amplification PCR targeting mitochondrial genome highly sensitive and specific in diagnosing malaria among returned travellers in Bergen Norway. Malar J. 2013;12:26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Isozumi R, Fukui M, Kaneko A, Chan CW, Kawamoto F, Kimura M. Improved detection of malaria cases in island settings of Vanuatu and Kenya by PCR that targets the Plasmodium mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase III (cox 3) gene. Parasitol Int. 2015;64:304–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Echeverry DF, Deason NA, Davidson J, Makuru V, Xiao H, Niedbalski J, et al. Human malaria diagnosis using a single-step direct-PCR based on the Plasmodium cytochrome oxidase III gene. Malar J. 2016;15:128.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Polley SD, Mori Y, Watson J, Perkins MD, Gonzáles IJ, Notomi T, et al. Mitochondrial DNA targets increase sensitivity of malaria detection using loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2866–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Cook J, Aydin-Schmidt B, Gonzáles IJ, Bell D, Edlund E, Nassor MH, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for point-of-care detection of asymptomatic low-density malaria parasite carriers in Zanzibar. Malar J. 2015;14:43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wells TNC, Burrows JN, Baird JK. Targeting the hypnozoite reservoir of Plasmodium vivax: the hidden obstacle to malaria elimination. Trends Parasitol. 2010;26:145–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Baird JK. Attacking Plasmodium vivax. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95(Suppl 6):1–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Oliveira-Ferreira J, Lacerda MV, Brasil P, Ladislau JL, Tauil PL, Daniel-Ribeiro CT. Malaria in Brazil: an overview. Malar J. 2010;9:115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Siqueira AM, Mesones-Lapouble O, Marchesini P, Sampaio VS, Brasil P, Tauil PL, et al. Plasmodium vivax landscape in Brazil: scenario and challenges. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95(Suppl 6):87–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Alves FP, Durlacher RR, Menezes MJ, Kriger H, Silva LHP, Camargo EP. High prevalence of asymptomatic Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum infections in native Amazonian populations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66:641–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sambrook J, Frotsch EF, Maniatis T. Isolation of DNA from mammalian cells. In: Ford N, Nolan C, Ferguson M, editors. Molecular cloning. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. p. 916–9.Google Scholar
  30. Gama BE, Silva-Pires FES, Lopes MNKR, Cardoso MAB, Britto C, Torres KL, et al. Real-time PCR versus conventional PCR for malaria parasite detection in low-grade parasitemia. Exp Parasitol. 2007;116:427–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Preiser PR, Wilson RJ, Moore PW, McCready S, Hajibagheri MA, Blight KJ, et al. Recombination associated with replication of malarial mitochondrial DNA. EMBO J. 1996;15:684–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilson RJM, Williamson DH. Extrachromosomal DNA in the Apicomplexa. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61:1–16.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Hänscheid T, Valadas E, Grobusch MP. Polymerase chain reaction for screening blood donors at risk for malaria: safe and useful? Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:872.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Guerrero IC, Weniger BC, Schultz MG. Transfusion malaria in the United States, 1972–1981. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:221–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Slinger R, Giulivi A, Bodie-Collins M, Hindieh F, John RS, Sher G, et al. Transfusion-transmitted malaria in Canada. CMAJ. 2001;164:377–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Benito A, Rubio JM. Usefulness of seminested polymerase chain reaction for screening blood donors at risk for malaria in Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:1068.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kitchen AD, Barbara JAJ, Hewitt PE. Documented cases of post-transfusion malaria occurring in England: a review in relation to current and proposed donor-selection guidelines. Vox Sang. 2005;89:77–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Garraud O, Assal A, Pelletier B, Danic B, Kerleguer A, David B, et al. Overview of revised measures to prevent malaria transmission by blood transfusion in France. Vox Sang. 2008;95:226–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Bloch EM, Vermeulen M, Murphy E. Blood transfusion safety in Africa: a literature review of infectious disease and organizational challenges. Transfus Med Rev. 2012;26:164–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Freimanis G, Sedegah M, Owusu-Ofori S, Kumar S, Allain J. Investigating the prevalence of transfusion transmission of Plasmodium within a hyperendemic blood donation system. Transfusion. 2013;53:1429–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Anthony CN, Lau Y, Sum J, Fong M, Ariffin H, Zaw W, et al. Malaysian child infected with Plasmodium vivax via blood transfusion: a case report. Malar J. 2013;12:308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Fugikaha E, Fornazari PA, Penhalbel RSR, Lorenzetti A, Maroso RD, Amoras JT, et al. Molecular screening of Plasmodium sp. asymptomatic carriers among transfusion centers from Brazilian Amazon region. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2007;49:1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Freitas DRC, Gomes LT, Fontes CJF, Tauil PL, Pang LW, Duarte EC. Sensitivity of nested-PCR for Plasmodium detection in pooled whole blood samples and its usefulness to blood donor screening in endemic areas. Transfus Apher Sci. 2014;50:242–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Jarra W, Thaithong S, Brown KN. Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the Polymerase Chain Reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infection. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;58:283–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Scopel KK, Fontes CJF, Nunes AC, Horta MF, Braga EM. High prevalence of Plasmodium malariae infections in a Brazilian Amazon endemic area (Apiacás–Mato Grosso State) as detected by polymerase chain reaction. Acta Trop. 2004;90:61–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Scuracchio P, Vieira SD, Dourado DA, Bueno LM, Colella R, Ramos-Sanchez EM, et al. Transfusion-transmitted malaria: case report of asymptomatic donor harboring Plasmodium malariae. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2011;53:55–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Maselli LMF, Levy D, Laporta GZ, Monteiro AM, Fukuya LA, Ferreira-da-Cruz MF, et al. Detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax subclinical infection in non-endemic region: implications for blood transfusion and malaria epidemiology. Malar J. 2014;13:224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Mendrone A Jr, Cerutti C Jr, Levi JE, Boulos M, Sanchez MCA, Malafronte RS, et al. Unexpected detection of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum DNA in asymptomatic blood donors: fact or artifact? Malar J. 2014;13:336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Sallum MAN, Daniel-Ribeiro CT, Laporta GZ, Ferreira-da-Cruz MF, Maselli LMF, Levy D, et al. Finding connections in the unexpected detection of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum DNA in asymptomatic blood donors: a fact in the Atlantic Forest. Malar J. 2014;13:337.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2018


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.