Skip to main content

Positive direct antiglobulin test in post-artesunate delayed haemolysis: more than a coincidence?



Delayed haemolysis is a frequent adverse event after treatment with artesunate (AS). Removing once-infected “pitted” erythrocytes by the spleen is the most accepted mechanism of haemolysis in these cases. However, an increasing number of cases with positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) haemolysis after AS have been reported.


All malaria cases seen at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, parasitological and laboratory data from patients treated with intravenous artesunate—specifically looking for delayed haemolysis and DAT—was collected.


Among the 36 severe malaria patients treated with artesunate at the hospital, 10 (27.8%) developed post-artesunate delayed haemolysis. Out of these, DAT was performed in six, being positive in four of them (at least 40%). DAT was positive only for complement—without IgG—suggesting drug-dependent immune-haemolytic anaemia of the immune-complex type. Three of the four patients were treated with corticosteroids and two also received blood transfusion, with a complete recovery.


Drug-induced auto-immune phenomena in post-artesunate delayed haemolysis may be underreported and must be considered. The role of corticosteroids should be reassessed.


Intravenous artesunate (AS) has been established as the first-line treatment for Plasmodium falciparum severe malaria after demonstrating its superiority over quinine, in terms of reduction of mortality and neurological sequelae, in multicentre randomized clinical trials, with no serious drug-related adverse events initially reported [1,2,3]. However, as a consequence of the generalized use of AS, the post-artesunate delayed haemolytic anaemia is increasingly been recognized and reported, even following the administration of oral artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) [3, 4].

In spite of conflicting case-definitions [5, 6], post-artesunate delayed haemolysis (PADH) pattern has generally been defined as the presence of haemolysis with a > 10% decrease in haemoglobin level or a > 10% rise in LDH concentrations occurring more than 8 days after initiation of treatment [5]. PADH is estimated to occur in about 15–30% of malarial patients treated with AS, mainly affecting non-immune patients (presumably patients with no immunity to malaria) [7,8,9]. Although the pathophysiology of PADH remains unclear, splenic “pitting” of once-infected erythrocytes has been postulated as the most plausible mechanism of haemolysis [5,6,7,8,9]. Unlike other anti-malarial agents, artemisinins turn intraerythrocytic trophozoites into non-viable pyknotic forms which are removed by the spleen. It is supposed that the decreased lifespan of the resulting once-infected erythrocytes would lead to haemolytic events between 7 and 28 days after anti-malarial treatment was started [5,6,7,8,9]. Remarkably, although only a handful of cases with positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) after AS has been described, they are increasingly being reported [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. This fact raises the possibility of drug-induced autoimmune mechanisms contributing to PADH in some patients.

The objective of this report was to review the clinical and immunohaematological characteristics of patients with positive DAT in the context of PADH.


All the 83 consecutive patients diagnosed with malaria attended at Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Spain, between January 2015 and December 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-nine per cent of them were migrants or visiting friends and relatives (VFR) and the remaining 61% were tourists or business travellers. Of these, specific clinical, parasitological and laboratory data was collected from the 36 patients diagnosed with severe malaria and treated with AS. Severe malaria was defined based on World Health Organization (WHO) malaria severity criteria [17]. PADH was defined as > 10% decrease in haemoglobin levels or > 10% rise in LDH concentrations occurring between the 8th and the 28th day after the first dose of AS, in patients with evidence of other parameters of haemolysis, such as hyperbilirubinaemia or decrease of haptoglobin in plasma. Hyperbilirubinaemia was defined as any increase above the normal limits with a previous normal determination or an increase > 10% if the previous determination was high. Decrease in plasma haptoglobin was defined as any decrease below normal limits with a previous normal determination.

The direct antiglobulin test (DAT), also known as direct Coombs test, was performed by the tube method with polyspecific antiglobulin (Anti-Human Globulin Mono-Type, Grifols Diagnostics AG, Düdingen, Switzerland) and monospecific anti-IgG and anti-C3d/C3c (both from Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).


PADH was diagnosed in 10 of the 36 (27.8%) malaria patients treated with intravenous AS. Median age of the affected patients was 45 years (interquartile range (IQR): 33.25–54.25 years) with 80% being males. All patients lived in non-endemic areas and acquired the infection through travelling to malaria-endemic areas. No patients were considered semi-immune by the study investigators [18].

DAT was positive for complement and negative for IgG in four of the six Plasmodium falciparum malaria cases in which it was performed (see below), which represents at least 40% (4/10) of patients with PADH and 11.1% (4/36) of patients treated with AS. No IgG antibodies were found in plasma, and a cold agglutinin with limited thermal range was detected in one of these four patients. Three of the four patients with positive DAT were admitted to hospital and treated with high doses of corticosteroids, and two of them also required blood transfusion. All patients successfully recovered from the haemolysis and no relapses occurred. Due to the mildness of the anaemia, the remaining patient did not require any treatment. Interestingly, the four patients with positive DAT had initially presented with higher parasitaemia than the remaining six PADH patients (26.8%, IQR 16.9–36.8 vs. 5.65%, IQR 4.5–8.0; p = 0.019).

Case descriptions

Cases with Coombs positive haemolytic anaemia after AS are described below.

Patient 1

A 55-year-old European traveler presented to the hospital with a 2-day course of fever after travelling throughout Zambia, Malawi, Mozambique and South Africa without taking anti-malarial prophylaxis. A blood smear detected P. falciparum (parasitaemia 14.8%). The patient was diagnosed with severe malaria based on hyperparasitaemia and treatment with intravenous AS (2.4 mg/kg) was started. However, in the blood smear performed 8 h after AS initiation parasitaemia increased to 28.6%. In spite of not fulfilling the WHO criteria of AS resistance, treatment was changed to intravenous quinine (10 mg/kg/8 h after a loading dose of 20 mg/kg) and doxycycline (100 mg/12 h), under the clinical suspicion of decreased susceptibility of P. falciparum to AS. Blood smear performed 72 h after starting this treatment was negative. Quinine was interrupted after 5 doses due to ototoxicity and treatment was completed with atovaquone/proguanil for 3 more days.

Eight days after being discharged (and 14 days after the first dose of AS) the patient was admitted again for a 4-day course of fever, jaundice and dark urine. Two consecutive blood smears and a Plasmodium molecular screening by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were negative. Laboratory tests showed haemolytic anaemia with hyperbilirubinaemia, elevation of LDH and undetectable haptoglobin. Haemoglobin levels decreased to 5.1 g/dL and DAT was positive only for the C3 fraction. Other causes of haemolytic anaemia were ruled out: no schistocytes were observed on the blood extension, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) deficiency and presence of antinuclear antibodies were discarded, as were other infectious aetiologies, such as common viral and bacterial infections. Treatment with corticosteroids with a loading dose of 250 mg of methylprednisolone and 1 mg/kg/day of prednisone was started. Transfusion of 4 erythrocyte concentrates was also required. The patient presented good clinical evolution allowing the discontinuation of corticosteroids after 2 months. Finally, the initial suspicion of AS resistance could not be proven by mutations on kelch13-propeller domain (k13).

Patient 2

A 55-year-old splenectomized European traveller was admitted to the intensive care unit because of severe P. falciparum malaria 11 days after returning from Sierra Leone. He did not properly take the anti-malarial chemoprophylaxis with atovaquone/proguanil as prescribed. The patient was diagnosed with severe malaria due to hyperparasitaemia (4.7%), acute kidney injury and hyperlactacidaemia, that prompted a rapid initiation of intravenous AS (2.4 mg/kg). Although clinical and analytical improvement were observed, malaria blood smears conducted at 12 and 24 h after AS initiation showed a steady increase in parasitaemia up to 8.7%. Under the suspicion of AS resistance, treatment was changed to intravenous quinine (10 mg/kg/8 h) and doxycycline (100 mg/12 h) after the 4th dose of AS. Ten days after admission, the patient was discharged asymptomatic and in good clinical condition. Sequencing of k13 showed no molecular markers associated to artemisinin resistance. A careful re-evaluation of malaria smears showed pyknotic non-viable forms due to the patient’s inability to remove erythrocytes from the bloodstream by “pitting”. A blood smear on day 28 was finally negative. During follow-up, microcytic anaemia (haemoglobin nadir of 9.8 g/dL at day 20) with hyperbilirubinaemia, increased LDH and undetectable haptoglobin was observed. DAT was positive for complement and cold agglutinin was detected in plasma. Given the mildness of the anaemia and the absence of symptoms, no treatment was required. A complete recovery was confirmed by laboratory tests after 2 weeks.

Patient 3

Eight days after returning from Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Malawi and Mozambique, a 40-year-old European traveller was admitted to the hospital for a 6-day course of fever and chills. He did not take anti-malarial prophylaxis. Diagnosis of severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria based on hyperparasitaemia (45%), acute kidney injury and respiratory distress was made. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit under mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and 2.4 mg/kg of intravenous AS. After 5 doses a blood smear was negative. Anti-malarial treatment was completed with intravenous quinine and doxycycline for 5 more days due to oral intolerance. Despite the good parasitological response, renal disfunction progressed requiring renal replacement therapy. Thirteen days after AS initiation anaemia with haemolytic pattern was detected, with a nadir haemoglobin level of 6.7 g/dL at day 17. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, schistocytes and other causes of haemolytic anaemia were ruled out and DAT resulted positive for the C3 fraction. The patient received a blood transfusion without anaemia improvement. Due to the kidney injury a renal biopsy was performed and reported as compatible with interstitial nephritis. Three pulses of 250 mg methylprednisolone were then prescribed. Regarding the anaemia, although a blood transfusion had previously been administered, haemoglobin concentration did not raise until corticosteroid treatment was initiated. The patient was finally discharged with a daily dose of 40 mg of prednisone and complete recovery was observed within the following month.

Patient 4

A 49-year-old European man who frequently travelled to West Africa for business was admitted to the intensive care unit of the hospital after travelling to Liberia. He had not taken anti-malarial prophylaxis. The patient was diagnosed with severe P. falciparum malaria based on hyperparasitaemia (25%), acute kidney injury, respiratory distress and hyperbilirubinaemia. Following the hospital protocols, after the first intravenous AS dose, red blood cell exchange was performed. Subsequently, four more doses of intravenous AS were administered. The patient had an excellent clinical, analytical and parasitological evolution with a parasite clearance time of 70 h. Anti-malarial treatment was then completed with a 3-day course of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine. Seven days after being discharged the patient had to be readmitted due to haemolytic anaemia, with a nadir haemoglobin level of 7.7 g/dL at day 16. DAT was positive for the C3d fraction of the complement and daily treatment with 100 mg methylprednisolone was started. Finally, a blood transfusion was performed after the DAT was negative. The patient was finally discharged with haemoglobin levels of 8.4 g/dL. Two weeks after, the patient remained in good clinical condition and the haemoglobin levels raised up to 9.6 g/dL.


Post-artesunate delayed haemolysis is increasingly being reported after anti-malarial treatment with artemisinins. In this series of 36 patients treated with parenteral AS, PADH occurred in over a fourth (27.8%) of patients treated with AS. Of these, DAT was positive in 4 of the 6 patients in whom the test was performed, which amounts to at least the 40% of patients with PADH. The true incidence of positive Coombs haemolysis after AS treatment is unknown. Since mechanical destruction of red blood cells (RBC) has been assumed as the main mechanism of haemolysis after AS, DAT has not been systematically performed and it has only been occasionally reported in most PADH case series. As a consequence, positive Coombs haemolytic anaemia after AS raises as a probable misdiagnosed entity.

Interestingly, in these 4 cases, DAT was positive only for complement—without IgG—as it was in two previously reported cases with specific information about the test [5, 10,11,12,13,14,15,16] (see Table 1). This pattern of DAT positivity is typical of the drug-dependent immune-haemolytic anaemia (IHA) of the immune-complex type [19], although it can also be seen in IHAs mediated by cold-agglutinins, biphasic haemolysins, and systemic immune-mediated disorders with strong complement activation, such some infectious events. There is little evidence about these immune delayed phenomena, but recent data suggest that post-malaria neurologic syndromes could also have an immunological mechanism [20]. Confirmation of drug-induced mechanism requires the demonstration of drug-dependent antibodies in the patient’s serum [10], which is a difficult task because of the intricacies of reproducing in vitro the in vivo conditions and because antibodies may recognize a metabolite instead of the original drug [20]. Positive DAT—with specific subclasses of IgG directed to parasite antigens—has been previously described in children from endemic countries with malaria and anaemia during the acute phase of the malaria infection [21, 22]. Despite that, the different pattern of DAT positivity might suggest a different pathophysiological mechanism of positive DAT delayed haemolysis, probably secondary to the use of AS [19].

Table 1 Summary of features of patients with immune-mediated post-artesunate delayed haemolysis (PADH)

Splenic “pitting” of parasites from infected erythrocytes, that has been related with initial parasitaemia, histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) and concentration of once-infected erythrocytes after treatment, has been proposed as the main mechanism for PADH [5]. These once-infected, “pitted” RBC become rigid spherocytes, and are removed from the circulation in subsequent passages through the spleen [5]. “Pitting” plays an important role in removing parasites from infected erythrocytes [23] and, in fact, PADH is more frequent in patients presenting with high parasitaemia or with a large number of residual spherocytes after effective treatment with AS [5]. However, given the mechanism of action of AS, “pitting” cannot explain all cases of haemolysis, as evidenced in the in splenectomized patients. Moreover, it is worth noticing that C3-coated RBC also become spherocytes before being removed from the circulation and might, therefore, be accounted for as pitted erythrocytes.

Furthermore, in all but one of the 4 patients with a positive DAT, PADH was severe enough as to require hospital admission and RBC transfusion. Treatment with corticosteroids in these 3 patients was followed by a rapid resolution of the haemolytic crisis, an outcome already observed in 6 of the 8 previously reported patients with PADH and positive DAT (see Table 1). However, it is important to be cautious before attributing therapeutic efficacy to corticosteroids in these cases. Indeed, both in PADH and drug-dependent IHA, the haemolytic process is self-limited once all the pitted erythrocytes have been removed and also when the drug has been cleared from the patient’s plasma.

This retrospective study has some limitations. On the one hand, DAT was only performed in some cases after the haemolysis appeared (6 of the 10 cases with PADH). As a consequence, DAT positivity due to malaria itself, although less probable, cannot be completely ruled out. The inclusion of a control group could have contributed to assess this problem. On the other hand, other causes of haemolysis such as drug-induced haemolysis due to different drugs such as beta-lactams, which were prescribed in the four patients, or quinine, which was given to 3 of the 4 patients, cannot be excluded. This is a hypothesis-generating study highlighting the importance of performing DAT when haemolysis after AS is detected.


These cases, together with those previously published, highlight the possible contribution of autoimmune mechanisms to haemolysis due to artemisinins in selected cases and reopen the debate about the possible benefit of corticosteroids [10,11,12,13, 16]. Coombs positive haemolytic anaemia after AS is possibly underreported, due to the assumption of “pitting” as the mechanism of haemolysis. The presented results suggest that mechanical destruction of once-infected “pitted” erythrocytes is no longer the exclusive mechanism to explain haemolysis after AS. Consequently, DAT should be performed in all cases of suspected haemolysis during the follow-up of patients treated with AS in order to rule out immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia [24]. Further studies are necessary to clarify the role of immune-mediated mechanisms in PADH with positive DAT and the possible therapeutic efficacy of corticosteroids.



artemisinin-based combination therapy




direct antiglobulin test


glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase


histidine-rich protein 2


immune-haemolytic anaemia


interquartile range


kelch 13


lactate dehydrogenase


post-artesunate delayed haemolysis


polymerase chain reaction


red blood cells


World Health Organization


  1. 1.

    Dondorp A, Nosten F, Stepniewska K, Day N, White N. Artesunate versus quinine for treatment of severe falciparum malaria: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2005;366:717–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dondorp AM, Fanello CI, Hendriksen IC, Gomes E, Seni A, Chhaganlal KD, et al. Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): an open-label, randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1647–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    WHO. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kurth F, Lingscheid T, Steiner F, Stegemann MS, Bélard S, Menner N, et al. Hemolysis after oral artemisinin combination therapy for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1381–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jauréguiberry S, Ndour P, Roussel C, Ader F, Sakeukui I, Nguyen M, et al. Postartesunate delayed hemolysis is a predictable event related to the lifesaving effect of artemisinins. Blood. 2014;124:167–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rolling T, Agbenyega T, Issifou S, Adegnika AA, Sylverken J, Spahlinger D, et al. Delayed hemolysis after treatment with parenteral artesunate in African children with severe malaria—a double-center prospective study. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:1921–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Roussel C, Caumes E, Thellier M, Ndour PA, Buffet PA, Jauréguiberry S. Artesunate to treat severe malaria in travellers: review of efficacy and safety and practical implications. J Travel Med. 2016;24:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rehman K, Lötsch F, Kremsner PG, Ramharter M. Haemolysis associated with the treatment of malaria with artemisinin derivatives: a systematic review of current evidence. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;29:268–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kurth F, Develoux M, Mechain M, Malvy D, Clerinx J, Antinori S, et al. Severe malaria in Europe: an 8-year multi-centre observational study. Malar J. 2017;16:57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Raffray L, Receveur MC, Beguet M, Lauroua P, Pistone T, Malvy D. Severe delayed autoimmune haemolytic anemia following artesunate administration in severe malaria: a case report. Malar J. 2014;13:398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lebrun D, Floch T, Brunet A, Julien G, Romaru J, N’Guyen Y, et al. Severe post-artesunate delayed onset anemia responding to corticotherapy: a case report. J Travel Med. 2018;25:tax091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Eder M, Farne H, Cargill T, Abbara A, Davidson RN. Intravenous artesunate versus intravenous quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria: a retrospective evaluation from a UK centre. Pathol Glob Health. 2012;106:181–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kreeftmijer-Vegter AR, van Genderen PJ, Visser LG, Bierman WF, Clerinx J, van Veldhuizen CK, et al. Treatment outcome of intravenous artesunate in patients with severe malaria in the Netherlands and Belgium. Malar J. 2012;11:102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rolling T, Schmiedel S, Wichmann D, Wittopf D, Burchard GD, Cramer JP. Post-treatment haemolysis in severe imported malaria after intravenous artesunate: case report of three patients with hyperparasitaemia. Malar J. 2012;11:169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Aldámiz-Echevarría Lois T, López-Polín A, Norman FF, Monge-Maillo B, López-Vélez R, Pérez-Molina JA. Delayed haemolysis secondary to treatment of severe malaria with intravenous artesunate: report on the experience of a referral centre for tropical infections in Spain. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2017;15:52–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Singh S, Singh SK, Tentu AK, Kumar A, Shahbabu B, Singh V, et al. Artesunate-induced severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia in complicated malaria. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018;22:753–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    WHO. Severe malaria. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19(Suppl1):7–131.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Doolan DL, Dobaño C, Baird JK. Acquired immunity to malaria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:13–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Garraty G. Immune hemolytic anemia associated with drug therapy. Blood Rev. 2010;24:143–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Markley JD, Edmond MB. Post-malaria neurological syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. J Travel Med. 2009;16:424–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Facer CA, Bray RS, Brown J. Direct Coombs antiglobulin reactions in Gambian children with Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Exp Immunol. 1979;35:119–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Facer CA. Direct Coombs antiglobulin reactions in Gambian children with Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Exp Immunol. 1980;41:81–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Buffet PA, Safeukui I, Deplaine G, Brousse V, Prendki V, Thellier M, et al. The pathogenesis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in humans: insights from splenic physiology. Blood. 2011;117:381–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rolling T, Agbenyega T, Krishna S, Kremsner PG, Cramer J. Delayed haemolysis after artesunate treatment of severe malaria—review of the literature and perspective. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2015;13:143–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

DC designed the study and reviewed all the cases. He performed the statistical analysis, elaborated the discussion and wrote the manuscript. AP reviewed all the cases and contributed on the writing and discussion of the manuscript. NRV contributed to the revision of the patients. AA, RV, CCP, QB, DM contributed to the discussion of the manuscript. JM contributed to the design of the study, and to the writing and discussion of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. Given the retrospective design of study and following our Clinical Research Ethics Committee regulations, informed consent from patients was not required.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Review Committee of the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Spain (CEIC) [Reg. No. HCB/2018/1180]. The study was conducted in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines set up by the WHO, and under the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and local rules and regulations.


This work was not supported by any sources of funding. ISGlobal is a member of CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya ( CISM is supported by the Government of Mozambique and the Spanish Agency for International Development (AECID).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Camprubí.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camprubí, D., Pereira, A., Rodriguez-Valero, N. et al. Positive direct antiglobulin test in post-artesunate delayed haemolysis: more than a coincidence?. Malar J 18, 123 (2019).

Download citation


  • Artesunate
  • PADH
  • Haemolytic anaemia
  • Direct antiglobulin test
  • Corticosteroids
  • Malaria