Skip to main content

Advertisement

Identification of Plasmodium falciparum proteoforms from liver stage models

Abstract

Background

Immunization with attenuated malaria sporozoites protects humans from experimental malaria challenge by mosquito bite. Protection in humans is strongly correlated with the production of T cells targeting a heterogeneous population of pre-erythrocyte antigen proteoforms, including liver stage antigens. Currently, few T cell epitopes derived from Plasmodium falciparum, the major aetiologic agent of malaria in humans are known.

Methods

In this study both in vitro and in vivo malaria liver stage models were used to sequence host and pathogen proteoforms. Proteoforms from these diverse models were subjected to mild acid elution (of soluble forms), multi-dimensional fractionation, tandem mass spectrometry, and top-down bioinformatics analysis to identify proteoforms in their intact state.

Results

These results identify a group of host and malaria liver stage proteoforms that meet a 5% false discovery rate threshold.

Conclusions

This work provides proof-of-concept for the validity of this mass spectrometry/bioinformatic approach for future studies seeking to reveal malaria liver stage antigens towards vaccine development.

Background

Nearly half of the world’s population is at risk of contracting malaria. In 2017, there were an estimated 219 million malaria cases and approximately 435,000 deaths [1]. In humans, malaria is caused by Plasmodium species, of which Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax are the major contributors to human morbidity and mortality. An effective malaria vaccine would reduce deaths and could accelerate the systematic elimination of malaria. As a result, investigators worldwide have sought to develop malaria vaccines that either block infection altogether, block transmission, or control infection loads at the blood stage [2].

During a Plasmodium infection cycle, mosquitoes introduce sporozoites into the skin of their host while taking a blood meal. The sporozoites that enter the blood stream migrate to the liver sinusoid, are thought to traverse Kupffer cells occupying endothelial fenestrae, and translocate through multiple hepatocytes before invading and initiating development in a final human liver cell [3]. After 8–10 days of replication in a parasitophorous vacuole, merozoites are released from their consumed hepatocyte and infect red blood cells. Blood stage merozoites continue to replicate and induce the symptoms of malaria.

Development of a vaccine that targets a portion of the parasite life cycle preceding the blood stage would stop malaria disease symptoms and block transmission of the parasite. Because these vaccines would target the sporozoite or liver stages, they are commonly referred to as “pre-erythrocytic” or “pre-red blood cell” (pre-RBC) vaccines. For the past several decades investigators have focused on pre-erythrocytic vaccines because of the radiation-attenuated sporozoite (RAS) paradigm [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Inoculation of RAS into humans by either mosquito bite or intravenous delivery protects humans from re-challenge with non-irradiated sporozoites [5, 9, 10]. This long-standing experimental vaccine paradigm suggests that it is possible to design a pre-erythrocyte vaccine that will provide complete sterile protection from malaria infection.

RAS immunization induces CD8+ and CD4+ T cells that kill malaria-infected hepatocytes [11,12,13,14]. Priming of antigen-specific effector T-cells by RAS in human and mouse infection models plateaus after the first immunization, [7, 15] suggesting that subsequent homologous RAS boost provides only minor gains in parasite-targeting T cell populations. RAS stimulates CD8+ T cells against liver stages by presenting pre-erythrocyte antigens through MHC Class I molecules on hepatocytes. After RAS sporozoites invade hepatocytes, parasite development stalls [16] resulting in degradation of a heterogeneous population of malaria pre-erythrocyte stage proteins. These are subjected to proteosomal degradation, and peptide cleavage products are subsequently loaded onto MHC class I molecules and presented on the hepatocyte surface. These degraded proteins undergo processing that is poorly understood, although preference for presentation via MHC Class I appears to favor parasite antigens containing a PEXEL domain [17].

Fragmentation of malaria proteins by host or parasite machinery leads to a plethora of proteoform antigens (truncated peptide fragments that no longer resemble the mass of the full-length protein and may contain post-translational modifications), which have previously been inaccessible for characterization. Identification of malaria proteoforms from liver stages would define putative antigens that induce the protective immunity afforded by RAS. Past studies by Tarun and Kappe successfully identified liver stage tryptic peptides from Plasmodium yoelii by enriching for fluorescently-labelled parasites [18]. More recently, Sinnis and colleagues characterized P. berghei merosome proteins released from HepG2 cells [19]. Discovery of the presented malaria liver stage antigens has remained elusive because malaria is a complex organism expressing > 5000 gene products [20], all of which can ultimately code for multiple different polypeptide species (proteoforms).

Currently, there exists a technological gap in the ability to identify the most commonly presented malaria liver stage antigen proteoform epitopes. This technological gap has left several essential questions in liver stage malaria unexplored. For example, there exists a distinct possibility that non-MHC Class I proteoforms are processed by the host machinery. Second, the segregation of the parasite vacuolar membrane from the host cytoplasm creates a barrier between the malaria proteoforms and host proteases. Hence the degree at which malaria proteoforms are digested and presented relative to host proteoforms has remained uncharacterized.

The aim of this study was to identify malaria proteoforms during the liver stage. By combining a parasite culture system in primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) and chimeric humanized mouse livers with multi-dimensional-protein-identification-technology (MudPIT) [21, 22], and top-down bioinformatics analysis [23], 229 P. falciparum proteins and 6185 host proteins were identified at a 5% false discovery rate (FDR). Collectively, these results suggest that direct proteoform sequencing is a viable approach to identify liver stage malaria antigens that can serve as vaccine candidates.

Methods

Animal studies

The chimeric mouse studies were performed at Princeton University. Animals were cared for in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and all protocols (number 1930) were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC). All facilities are accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International and operate in accordance with the NIH and U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines and the Animal Welfare Act.

Engraftment of adult human hepatocytes into FAH−/− NOD Rag1−/− IL2RγNULL (FNRG) mice

FNRG mice were generated and transplanted as previously described [24, 25]. Female mice between 6 and 10 weeks of age were injected with approximately 1.0 × 106 cryopreserved adult human hepatocytes. Primary human hepatocytes were obtained from BioIVT (Westbury, NY). FNRG mice were cycled on NTBC (Yecuris Inc, Tualatin OR) supplemented in their water to block the build-up of toxic metabolites. FNRG mice were maintained on amoxicillin chow. Hepatocyte engraftment was monitored by ELISA for human albumin.

Albumin ELISA for assessment of human hepatocyte engraftment of chimeric mice

Levels of human albumin in mouse serum were quantified by ELISA; 96-well flat-bottomed plates (Nunc, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Witham MA) were coated with goat anti-human albumin antibody (1:500, Bethel) in coating buffer (1.59 g Na2CO3, 2.93 g NaHCO3, 1L dH2O, pH = 9.6) for 1 h at 37 °C. The plates were washed four times with wash buffer (0.05% Tween 20 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Luis MO) in 1× PBS) then incubated with superblock buffer (Fisher Scientific, Hampton NH) for 1 h at 37 °C. Plates were washed twice. Human serum albumin (Sigma Aldrich, St. Luis MO) was diluted to 1 µg/mL in sample diluent (10% Superblock, 90% wash buffer), then serial diluted 1:2 in 135 µL sample diluent to establish an albumin standard. Mouse serum (5 µL) was used for a 1:10 serial dilution in 135 µL sample diluent. The coated plates were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C, then washed three times. Mouse anti-human albumin (50 µL, 1:2000 in sample diluent, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was added and plates were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Plates were washed four times and 50 µL of goat anti-mouse-HRP (1:10,000 in sample diluent, LifeTechnologies, Carlsbad, CA) was added and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Plates were washed six times. TMB (100 µL) substrate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Luis, MO) was added and the reaction was stopped with 12.5 µL of 2 N H2SO4. Absorbance was read at 450λ on the BertholdTech TriStar (Bad Wildbad, Germany).

Infection of human liver chimeric humanized mice

The chimeric FNRG mice were infected with 1 × 106 freshly dissected P. falciparum NF54 sporozoites through tail vein injection. Seven days after inoculation mice were sacrificed, chimeric livers were removed, and livers were placed in OCT (optimal cutting temperature) media and immediately frozen at − 80 °C. Mouse liver sections were stained with either anti-CSP Cat #MRA-183A (1:100 BEI resources, Manassas, VA) or anti-P. falciparum HSP70 LifeSpan Biosciences, Inc (Seattle, WA) (1:50) followed by anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:200) or anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:100) with either Hoechst stain (1:2000) or DAPI.

Extraction of proteoforms from chimeric mouse livers

Sporozoite-infected chimeric mouse livers preserved in OCT media were thawed and washed 30 mL of 1× PBS by centrifugation at 1000×g for 5 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and replaced with 1 mL of 10% Acetic acid. Infected livers were subjected to dounce homogenization. Liver lysates were centrifuged at 5000×g for 5 min and the supernatant (containing proteoforms) was harvested. The proteoform-containing eluents were immediately treated with 1 mL of 1 M Tris pH 7.5 to neutralize the acetic acid and stabilize proteoforms. Eluents from infected liver lysates were centrifuged through spin filters with a Microcon 10 kDa mass cut-off (Millipore, Burlington, MA) at 10,000×g for 15 min. The retentate was discarded and the flow through was harvested and subjected to desalting over a reverse-phase C8 macrotrap column (Michrom Bioresources, Auburn, CA) and lyophilized via speedvac.

Culture of primary human hepatocytes (PHHs)

Primary human hepatocytes were cultured as described by Zou et al. [26]. Briefly, primary human donor hepatocytes were purchased from BioIVT, Inc (Baltimore, MD). 200,000 viable hepatocytes from three different human donors were plated per well. The hepatocytes were plated on LabTekR (ThermoFisher, Watham, MA) chamber slides and inoculated with 100,000 P. falciparum NF54 freshly dissected sporozoites. Following inoculation hepatocytes were washed every 24 h with 1× phosphate-buffered saline and fresh media was provided. PHH cells were fixed and stained with anti-P. falciparum HSP70 LifeSpan Biosciences, Inc (Seattle, WA) (1:50), anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:100), DAPI, and Evans Blue at 72 and 196 h after inoculation.

Isolation of proteoforms from infected primary human hepatocytes

Sporozoite-infected hepatocytes were washed in 500 µL of 1× PBS by centrifugation at 1000×g for 5 min. After centrifugation the supernatant was removed and replaced with 500 µL of 10% Acetic acid to liberate proteins and protein fragments. Hepatocyte lysates were centrifuged at 1000×g for 5 min and the supernatant (containing proteoforms) was harvested. The proteoform-containing eluents were immediately treated with 500 µL of 1 M Tris pH 7.5 to neutralize the acetic acid and stabilize proteoforms. Eluents from infected hepatocytes were centrifuged through spin filters with a Microcon 10 kDa mass cut-off filter (Millipore, Burlington, MA) at 10,000×g for 15 min. The retentate was discarded and the flow through was harvested and subjected to desalting over a reverse-phase C8 chromatography column and lyophilized.

Intact mass spectrometry of proteoforms

The desalted and lyophilized proteoforms were subjected to MudPIT (multi-dimensional-protein-identification-technology) as described previously [27]. Briefly, proteoforms were loaded onto a strong cation exchange column packed in-line with C8 reversed phase chromatography material. The proteoforms were electrosprayed into a ThermoFisher Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher, Bremen, Germany). MS1 resolution was set to a resolution of 70,000. The top 15 ions were selected for fragmentation. MS2 resolution for fragmented proteoform spectra was set to a resolution of 17,500. Proteoforms were sequenced using a dynamic exclusion setting duration of 30 s to identify lower abundance proteoforms.

Database searches and identification of proteoforms

For monoculture samples, a human P. falciparum (strain NF54) UniProt concatenated database was generated and loaded onto the Galaxy server and searched using TD Portal. For humanized mouse samples, a human-mouse P. falciparum (strain NF54) UniProt concatenated database was generated and loaded onto the Galaxy server and searched using TD Portal. For both human and chimeric mouse samples proteoforms were reported at a 5% FDR cut-off. Host and parasite proteoforms with spectral matches above and below the 5% FDR are included in Additional file 2: Table S1 and Additional file 3: Table S2.

Quantification of schizont size and number of merozoites per schizont

Image processing was performed using Fiji and Nikon elements software (Nikon, Minato, Tokyo, Japan). The area quantification tool was utilized to determine schizont size. The dot identification tool was utilized for merozoite quantification by using it in the DAPI channel and limiting it to the schizont area.

Statistical analysis of schizonts and merozoites

Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism Software (Graphpad, La Jolla, CA). A nonparametric t test was performed. P values less than 0.01 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Model of truncated proteoforms generated from malaria-infected hepatocytes

While several laboratories have reported gains in malaria liver stage model development, these studies have yet to explore the repertoire of host and parasite proteoforms generated during schizont maturation. Given past reports from human and animal models of live sporozoite challenge, it is clear that attenuated sporozoites can induce a population of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells targeting liver stage antigens [7]. The generation of these T cell populations has formed the basis for a model in which hepatocytes present malaria antigens on MHC class I. Also possible, but largely unexplored, is the idea that developing schizont proteoforms are digested by host or parasite proteases in a manner that does not resemble MHC Class I peptides (Fig. 1). These non-MHC Class I proteoforms could exist as random fragments with no potential for interaction with histocompatibility receptors or these fragments could be on-path for additional digestion and subsequent MHC Class I presentation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Model of peptide processing in LS schizonts. Schizont proteoforms are processed through the proteasome and presented on MHC Class I through the ER or degraded as non-MHC Class I fragment peptides during schizogony

A typical bottom up mass spectrometry approach to identify malaria proteoforms from liver stage models would digest host and parasite fragments with trypsin prior to mass spectrometry analysis. Digestion of the host and malaria proteoforms prior to analysis obfuscates the structure of the proteoform from the liver tissue. To identify malaria polypeptides in their intact form from malaria liver stage models requires an unbiased approach capable of matching candidate mass spectra from non-digested host and parasite proteoforms. To capture native host and parasite proteoforms from liver stage models, this study utilized a top down mass spectrometry approach.

Characterization of Plasmodium falciparum liver stage models

Towards identification of liver stage malaria proteoforms this study first analysed parasite growth characteristics in state-of-the-art experimental liver stage models including PHHs grown in vitro and human liver chimeric (FNRG) mice [26, 28,29,30]. Primary human hepatocytes were transplanted into FNRG mice which after several weeks became highly engrafted as seen by ~ 1 × 104 µg/mL human albumin level in the serum of transplanted animals (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The chimeric FNRG mice were subsequently injected with P. falciparum NF54 sporozoites to form liver stage parasites. PHHs were inoculated with P. falciparum NF54 sporozoites and subsequently stained at different time points with anti-P. falciparum-HSP70 antibodies. Seventy-two hours after sporozoite inoculation of PHHs, parasite schizonts were apparent and smaller than the hepatocyte nucleus (Fig. 2a). Eight days later the parasite schizonts exceeded the size of the hepatocyte nucleus, but merozoite formation was disorganized and the overall growth of the in vitro schizont was stunted (Fig. 2b). In contrast, infected hepatocytes from human liver chimeric mice inoculated with P. falciparum NF54 sporozoites via tail vein injection and stained with anti-P. falciparum-CSP had large, organized schizonts filled with merozoites that dwarfed the size of the hepatocyte nucleus 7 days after inoculation (Fig. 2c). The size of schizonts in human liver chimeric FNRG mice and PHH cultures were quantified (Fig. 3a). Schizonts from engrafted FNRG mouse livers were statistically larger (p = 0.0002) ranging from 260 to 385 nm2, while schizonts from PHH mono-cultures were 162 nm2 to 212 nm2 in size. In addition, there were statistically more numerous merozoites (p < 0.0001) per schizont in FNRG humanized mice ranging from 20 to 50 versus 5 to 18 in PHH mono-cultures (Fig. 3b). These results suggest that while the in vitro PHH model supports schizont development during the first few days after sporozoite inoculation, the chimeric humanized mouse liver model is a more supportive conduit for late liver stage development. This could be due to the fact that the latter human hepatocytes have a transcriptional profile more similar to what is observed in the human liver because they are in the three-dimensional context of the murine liver.

Fig. 2
figure2

NF54 P. falciparum malaria liver stage schizonts. a Primary human hepatocyte monoculture cells infected with P. falciparum NF54 malaria sporozoites were stained 72 h after inoculation with HSP70 antibodies, DAPI, and Evans Blue. b The identical experiment was performed as in (a) except cells were fixed and stained after 192 h (8 days). c LS schizonts from humanized mice infected with NF54 sporozoites were fixed and stained 7 days after sporozoite inoculation with Hoechst and anti-CSP antibodies

Fig. 3
figure3

Quantification of schizont size and number of merozoites in PHHs from FNRG mice and in vitro monocultures. a Schizonts from P.f. infected FNRG mice and from monocultured PHHs were imaged with size determined. b The number of merozoite progeny in monocultured human hepatocytes and FRNG mice were determined

Characteristics of host and parasite proteoforms from liver stage models

Mild acid elution (10% acetic acid) and molecular weight spin columns were used to extract low molecular weight proteoforms from intact chimeric human/mouse liver tissue and PHHs infected with P. falciparum NF54 sporozoites. The use of 10% acetic acid will result in only acid-soluble proteoforms being identified as a possible limitation of the approach. Due to the aforementioned developmental capacity of the chimeric human/mouse model, livers were harvested 7 days after infection with P. falciparum NF54 sporozoites. PHHs were harvested 96 h after infection prior to the apparent disruption in schizont development observed in Fig. 2b. Soluble, acid-extracted proteoforms were subjected to multi-dimensional chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry followed by bioinformatics analysis using TDPortal and TDViewer [23]. Proteoform MS/MS spectra were searched against a concatenated tripartite Human-Mouse-NF54 database and scrambled decoy database to identify spectral matches from humanized mouse experiments whereas proteoform spectra from human hepatocyte monocultures were searched against a concatenated Human-NF54 database with a matched scrambled decoy database. Top-down bioinformatics tools were employed to: (1) identify fragmented proteoform species isolated in their native state and (2) to accurately control the FDR associated with mass spectrometry identification of proteins and proteoforms as described recently by Leduc et al. [23].

Using TDPortal at a 5% proteoform FDR cutoff, a total of 5343 unique proteins were identified from three different infected human chimeric mouse livers. Host and parasite proteoform spectra identified from these studies that did not pass the 5% FDR cut-off are included in Additional file 2: Table S1 but were not analysed here. In Additional file 2: Table S1 and Additional file 3: Table S2 a global Q-value is included that is the equivalent of an individual FDR value for each proteoform [31]. From three biological replicate human primary hepatocyte (monoculture) samples a total of 1339 total unique proteins were identified. The length distribution of host (Fig. 4a) and parasite proteoforms (Fig. 4b) was analysed from infected chimeric human mouse livers and PHHs. Results showed a mean amino acid length of 24.4 (standard deviation of 11.86), and a median length of 29 for host proteoforms from humanized mouse livers and a mean length of 26.8 (standard deviation of 25.3), and a median length of 17 from primary human hepatocytes. Parasite proteoforms had a mean length of 22.5 amino acids (standard deviation of 6.0), and a median length of 22 from humanized mouse livers and a mean length of 16.4 (standard deviation of 5.9) amino acids, and a median length of 15 in primary human hepatocytes. These results suggest that both host and parasite proteoforms from liver stage models are within the expected size range of MHC Class I peptides (8–12 amino acids), MHC Class II peptides (12–31 amino acids), and randomly degraded proteoform fragments.

Fig. 4
figure4

Proteoform length from liver stage models. a Whisker boxplot of host proteoform sequence length (in amino acids) from humanized mice (mice) or primary human hepatocytes (monoculture), b malaria proteoform sequence length (in amino acids) The first quartile of proteoform length is indicated by the lower error bar. The third quartile is indicated by the upper error bar. The median proteoform length is indicated by a horizontal line in the box

Identification of host and parasite proteins sequenced across biological replicates

To identify host and P. falciparum proteins that were sequenced across different biological replicates of infected humanized mouse livers and infected primary human hepatocytes sample sets were analysed using venn diagrams. Among three humanized infected mouse liver samples 5343 total host proteins (Fig. 5a) and 190 total P. falciparum proteins were identified (Fig. 5b). Conserved proteins from infected chimeric mouse livers, (representing those that were sequenced in two or more samples), numbered 1930 (36% of total) among host proteins (Fig. 5a) and 20 (10.5% of total) among P. falciparum proteins (Fig. 5b). Among infected primary human hepatocytes, a total of 1339 total Human proteins (Fig. 5c), 39 total P. falciparum proteins (Fig. 5d), 573 (42% of total) conserved Human proteins (Fig. 5c), and two (5% of total) conserved P. falciparum proteins were identified across biological replicates (Fig. 5d). The four proteins identified among all infected humanized mouse livers were W7KN90 (an uncharacterized protein), W7K8P5 (26S proteasome regulatory subunit), W7JYB7 (Actin-2), and W7K9G1 (DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic subunit A) (Table 1). Among infected primary human hepatocyte samples a single protein (W7K7Q9), encoding an uncharacterized protein, was sequenced in all three biological replicates (Table 2).

Fig. 5
figure5

Shared proteins identified between different biological replicate samples. a Venn diagram of shared host proteins from humanized mouse livers infected with NF54 sporozoites. b Venn diagram of shared malaria proteins from humanized mouse livers infected with NF54 sporozoites. c Venn diagram of shared host proteins from primary human hepatocytes infected with NF54 sporozoites. d Venn diagram of shared malaria proteins from primary human hepatocytes infected with NF54 sporozoites

Table 1 Uniprot accession number, amino acid sequence, sequence length, C-score, presence or absence in sporozoites, presence or absence in blood stages, PEXEL domain, IEDB immunogenicity score, and PlasmoDB (3D7) identification number of malaria proteoforms identified from > 1 biological replicate of humanized mouse livers infected with NF54 sporozoites
Table 2 Uniprot accession number, amino acid sequence, sequence length, C-score, presence or absence in sporozoites, presence or absence in blood stages, PEXEL domain, IEDB immunogenicity score, and PlasmoDB (3D7) identification number of malaria proteoforms identified from > 1 biological replicate of primary human hepatocytes infected with NF54 sporozoites

Conserved P. falciparum proteoforms sequenced from infected chimeric mouse livers ranged in length from 9 to 29 amino acids. The C-score, indicating relative level of proteoform characterization among conserved proteoforms ranged from 3 to 1059 (Table 1) in the infected humanized mouse samples. The C-score utilizes native proteoform mass data (precursor ion information) and proteoform fragmentation data to pair the best match against the target proteomes (Human and/or Mouse, and P. falciparum NF54 in this case) [31]. C-scores > 40 indicate extensive characterization, while C-scores between 3 and 40 are identified but only partially characterized [31]. Conserved P. falciparum proteoforms sequenced from infected primary human hepatocytes ranged in length from 10 to 19 amino acids with a C-score ranging from 24 to 274 (Table 2).

Infected chimeric humanized mouse livers contained large mature liver forms. Consistent with the late liver stage two different merozoite surface proteoforms derived from MSP8 and MSP7-like proteins were identified (Table 1) from the infected mouse liver samples. Overall, a strong representation (90%) of proteins expressed at blood stages from the chimeric liver samples was observed whereas 65% of proteins were expressed at sporozoite stages. Fifteen-percent of proteins identified from the chimeric mouse livers contained PEXEL domains.

Among proteins identified in the primary human monoculture samples- both are expressed in sporozoite stages. Proteoforms derived from PTEX150 are expressed in both sporozoite and liver stages. While none of the monoculture proteins contained PEXEL domains, PTEX150 is a structural component of the translocation system that moves parasite molecules from the PVM to the host cytoplasm [32, 33].

Among the proteoforms sequenced from the monoculture and chimeric humanized mouse samples the Immune epitope database and analysis resource (IEDB) MHC Class I immunogenicity tool was used to test which proteoform sequences had the highest likelihood of inducing T cell responses [34]. Proteoforms with the highest IEDB immunogenicity score were derived from the MSP7-like protein identified in humanized mouse samples containing an IEDB score of 0.966. Consistently sequenced proteoforms from chimeric humanized mouse samples had IEDB scores ranging from (− 1.14 to 0.966) (Table 1). Monoculture IEDB scores were moderate and ranged from (0.219 to 0.552) (Table 2).

Discussion

The goal of this study was to test the technical feasibility of sequencing proteoform signatures from human liver cells infected with P. falciparum. Results of this study suggest that combining MudPIT and top-down bioinformatics approaches can distinguish host proteoforms from parasite proteoforms and identify liver stage polypeptides near the mass range of MHC Class I and MHC Class II restricted epitopes.

After sporozoites enter the hepatocyte cytoplasm, they form a parasite vacuolar membrane that interfaces with the host autophagy system [35,36,37]. Parasites have designed a system to escape this endogenous cytoplasmic immunity that involves disrupting autophagy and lysosome interactions with the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) [38]. Specifically, the parasite tubovesicular network can sequester host factors that damage the PVM [37]. Liver stage schizonts that increase in size and ultimately succeed in the developmental process do not have autophagy and lysosomal markers associated with the PVM [37]. These past studies suggest that the parasite has evolved mechanisms to evade degradation by the host cytoplasmic immune response.

While the PVM can function as a protective barrier for parasite development, exchange of parasite material (proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids) between the liver stage PVM and host cytoplasm remains an unexplored possibility. In this study, mass spectrometry was used to identify host and malaria proteoforms from liver stages. Because an enrichment mechanism is lacking to specifically harvest schizont-containing hepatocytes, samples in this study likely contained uninfected cells, infected cells with aborted development, and infected hepatocytes with vegetative schizonts. Hence proteoforms sequenced in these studies could be derived from intact or aborted schizonts. Additionally, experiments using chimeric mouse livers that were frozen, thawed, and homogenized could generate degraded proteoforms that reflect degradation during sample preparation rather than parasite metabolic activity. Currently, these two forms cannot be distinguished.

Infection of 200,000 hepatocytes with 100,000 P. falciparum sporozoites typically results in 0.1–0.2% of the cells infected with mature schizonts after 96 h post-inoculation [26]. Thus, a majority of hepatocytes inoculated with sporozoites do not mount productive infections. MudPIT sequencing from infected hepatocytes resulted in the identification of both Human and P. falciparum proteins at a ratio of 34:1 (Human: P. falciparum). The P. falciparum species represent approximately 2.9% of the total protein population. Given that so few hepatocytes are infected with mature schizonts after 96 h (post-sporozoite inoculation), this result is surprising in that one might expect the ratio to be nearly 1000:1 (Human: P. falciparum proteins). Additionally, each schizont represents only a portion of the total hepatocyte mass. However, there are at least two likely reasons for this result. First, the initial parasite to hepatocyte ratio is 1:2 (during inoculation). In theory, a perfect infection, where each sporozoite gave rise to one schizont would result in 50% of hepatocytes harbouring schizonts. Inoculation only results in 0.1–0.2% of cells containing schizonts [26]. Hence, a majority of parasites must invade hepatocytes and then subsequently abort their development between 0 and 96 h post-inoculation. Proteins from sporozoites that fail to develop in hepatocytes are most likely degraded. Therefore, P. falciparum proteoform identifications from this study are likely derived from both mature schizonts and sporozoites that failed to develop. A second reason for observing an unexpectedly high number of P. falciparum peptides from these hepatocytes is mostly technical. During these experiments, the mass spectrometer isolates and fragments the most abundant peptides. After the first round of peptide isolation and fragmentation, the instrument selects for a lower abundance ion and continues to select for progressively lower abundance ions in a mode known as dynamic exclusion. Importantly, because the instrument in these studies employed dynamic exclusion mode, the number of P. falciparum proteoform identifications was enhanced.

While these studies are encouraging and provide a proof-of-concept for sequencing proteoforms from liver stages, recent improvements in mass spectrometry instrumentation could enhance similar studies aimed at identifying malaria liver stage antigens. For example, the development of Tribrid instruments, containing three mass analysers in tandem are capable of identifying more spectra and are compatible with gas-phase separation techniques (such as high-field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry) (FAIMS). From a complex mixture of polypeptides, FAIMS can select proteoforms of interest that have specific size, charge, or shape characteristics [39,40,41]. This study and others that aim to isolate small polypeptides (similar in size to MHC Class I), often perform biochemical (often separation by MW) fractionation prior to mass spectrometry analysis [42,43,44]. During fractionation much of the low molecular weight polypeptides are lost. In future experiments utilization of FAIMS could circumvent the need for size separation prior to mass spectrometry and instead use gas-phase fractionation to sequence malaria and self-peptides from liver stages. This experimental modification should increase the number and depth of proteoforms identified from malaria liver stages by reducing sample loss experienced during off-line size fractionation and selecting for smaller proteoforms using the FAIMS device.

Numerous antigen discovery efforts have led to the identification of pre-erythrocyte antigens that induce sterile immunity from malaria challenge. Some of these antigens function either partially or entirely through CD8+ T cells. For example, the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) is highly expressed in sporozoites and early liver stages, induces antibodies [3, 30, 45,46,47,48,49], induces immunodominant CD8+ T cells that confer protective immunity in naïve mice [50], and protects humans from experimental malaria challenge [51]. Despite the strong expression and assumed MHC Class I presentation of CSP at liver stages, this study failed to detect these antigens as dominantly presented peptides. That MHC Class I restricted peptides from CSP are presented to CD8+ T cells during the course of malaria infection suggests that our approach has limitations in sensitivity. Additionally, P. falciparum CSP contains a repeating amino acid pattern of NANPN that accounts for 40% of the predicted protein sequence. Fragment ions from cleavage adjacent to proline ions dominate tandem mass spectra. The dominance of proline within CSP fragments could reduce the number of fragment ion matches resulting in a failure to match CSP spectra to the P. falciparum proteome. As a second possibility, malaria liver stage samples for these studies were taken at timepoints ≥ 96 h after sporozoite inoculation, where CSP expression could wane as the parasite transitions to late liver stages.

While our analysis failed to detect circumsporozoite proteoforms, both humanized mouse livers and hepatocyte monocultures detected sporozoite proteoforms (Additional file 2: Table S1 and Additional file 3: Table S2). Consistent with the recent characterization of P. berghei merosomes by Shears et al. [19], MSP7-like and MSP-8 proteoforms were observed in mature liver stage forms isolated from humanized mouse samples but not monoculture samples (Additional file 3: Table S2). These results support our observation that chimeric humanized mice support development of mature liver stages. The truncated schizont development observed in the monoculture system suggests that it should be considered for use in future studies aiming to characterize early liver stages whereas the chimeric humanized mouse model shows potential to be useful for analysis of early and late liver stages.

Conclusions

Attenuated sporozoites provide an effective mechanism to prime immune responses, and ultimately induce protection against genetically homologous or heterologous parasite challenge [7]. Currently, approaches to prime and boost with sporozoites results in a plateau of T cell populations targeting parasites [7, 15]. Priming with a diverse population of genetically attenuated sporozoites followed by boost with an orthogonal immunization mechanism might enhance the breadth and depth of protection beyond what has been achieved in past human malaria challenge trials. Here, an approach was described to identify liver stage proteoforms from in vivo and in vitro parasite culture systems. These experiments provide an experimental proof-of-concept to identify liver stage antigens that serve as orthogonal immunization targets following attenuated sporozoite inoculation.

Availability of data and materials

The authors agree to make any and all raw data files available upon request.

Abbreviations

RBC:

red blood cell

RAS:

radiation attenuated sporozoites

MHC:

major histocompatibility complex

MudPIT:

multi-dimensional-protein-identification-technology

PHH:

primary human hepatocytes

FDR:

false discovery rate

ELISA:

enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay

NTBC:

2-(2-nitro-4-trifluoro-methylbenzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione

FNRG:

FAH−/− NOD Rag1−/− IL2RγNULL mice

TMB:

3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine

CSP:

circumsporozoite protein

FAIMS:

high-field-asymmetric-ion-mobility-spectrometry

MW:

molecular weight

References

  1. 1.

    WHO. World malaria report 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

  2. 2.

    Schwartz L, Brown GV, Genton B, Moorthy VS. A review of malaria vaccine clinical projects based on the WHO rainbow table. Malar J. 2012;11:11.

  3. 3.

    Khan ZM, Ng C, Vanderberg JP. Early hepatic stages of Plasmodium berghei: release of circumsporozoite protein and host cellular inflammatory response. Infect Immun. 1992;60:264–70.

  4. 4.

    Epstein JE, Paolino KM, Richie TL, Sedegah M, Singer A, Ruben AJ, et al. Protection against Plasmodium falciparum malaria by PfSPZ vaccine. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e89154.

  5. 5.

    Hoffman SL, Goh LM, Luke TC, Schneider I, Le TP, Doolan DL, et al. Protection of humans against malaria by immunization with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:1155–64.

  6. 6.

    Ishizuka AS, Lyke KE, DeZure A, Berry AA, Richie TL, Mendoza FH, et al. Protection against malaria at 1 year and immune correlates following PfSPZ vaccination. Nat Med. 2016;22:614–23.

  7. 7.

    Lyke KE, Ishizuka AS, Berry AA, Chakravarty S, DeZure A, Enama ME, et al. Attenuated PfSPZ Vaccine induces strain-transcending T cells and durable protection against heterologous controlled human malaria infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:2711–6.

  8. 8.

    Mordmuller B, Surat G, Lagler H, Chakravarty S, Ishizuka AS, Lalremruata A, et al. Sterile protection against human malaria by chemoattenuated PfSPZ vaccine. Nature. 2017;542:445–9.

  9. 9.

    Seder RA, Chang LJ, Enama ME, Zephir KL, Sarwar UN, Gordon IJ, et al. Protection against malaria by intravenous immunization with a nonreplicating sporozoite vaccine. Science. 2013;341:1359–65.

  10. 10.

    Clyde DF. Immunization of man against falciparum and vivax malaria by use of attenuated sporozoites. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1975;24:397–401.

  11. 11.

    Weiss WR, Jiang CG. Protective CD8+ T lymphocytes in primates immunized with malaria sporozoites. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e31247.

  12. 12.

    Weiss WR, Sedegah M, Beaudoin RL, Miller LH, Good MF. CD8 + T cells (cytotoxic/suppressors) are required for protection in mice immunized with malaria sporozoites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:573–6.

  13. 13.

    Schofield L, Villaquiran J, Ferreira A, Schellekens H, Nussenzweig R, Nussenzweig V. Gamma interferon, CD8+ T cells and antibodies required for immunity to malaria sporozoites. Nature. 1987;330:664–6.

  14. 14.

    Schofield L, Ferreira A, Altszuler R, Nussenzweig V, Nussenzweig RS. Interferon-gamma inhibits the intrahepatocytic development of malaria parasites in vitro. J Immunol. 1987;139(6):2020–5.

  15. 15.

    Murphy SC, Kas A, Stone BC, Bevan MJ. A T-cell response to a liver-stage Plasmodium antigen is not boosted by repeated sporozoite immunizations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:6055–60.

  16. 16.

    Hollingdale MR, Leland P, Sigler CI. In vitro cultivation of the exoerythrocytic stage of Plasmodium berghei in irradiated hepatoma cells. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985;34:21–3.

  17. 17.

    Montagna GN, Beigier-Bompadre M, Becker M, Kroczek RA, Kaufmann SH, Matuschewski K. Antigen export during liver infection of the malaria parasite augments protective immunity. MBio. 2014;5:e01321-14.

  18. 18.

    Tarun AS, Peng X, Dumpit RF, Ogata Y, Silva-Rivera H, Camargo N, et al. A combined transcriptome and proteome survey of malaria parasite liver stages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:305–10.

  19. 19.

    Shears MJ, Sekhar Nirujogi R, Swearingen KE, Renuse S, Mishra S, Jaipal Reddy P, et al. Proteomic analysis of Plasmodium merosomes: the link between liver and blood stages in malaria. J Proteome Res. 2019;18:3404–18.

  20. 20.

    Gardner MJ, Hall N, Fung E, White O, Berriman M, Hyman RW, et al. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2002;419:498–511.

  21. 21.

    Link AJ, Eng J, Schieltz DM, Carmack E, Mize GJ, Morris DR, et al. Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:676–82.

  22. 22.

    Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR 3rd. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:242–7.

  23. 23.

    LeDuc RD, Fellers RT, Early BP, Greer JB, Shams DP, Thomas PM, et al. Accurate estimation of context-dependent false discovery rates in top-down proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2019;18:796–805.

  24. 24.

    de Jong YP, Dorner M, Mommersteeg MC, Xiao JW, Balazs AB, Robbins JB, et al. Broadly neutralizing antibodies abrogate established hepatitis C virus infection. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:254ra129.

  25. 25.

    Winer BY, Huang T, Low BE, Avery C, Pais MA, Hrebikova G, et al. Recapitulation of treatment response patterns in a novel humanized mouse model for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Virology. 2017;502:63–72.

  26. 26.

    Zou X, House BL, Zyzak MD, Richie TL, Gerbasi VR. Towards an optimized inhibition of liver stage development assay (ILSDA) for Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J. 2013;12:394.

  27. 27.

    Schey KL, Luther JM, Rose KL. Proteomics characterization of exosome cargo. Methods. 2015;87:75–82.

  28. 28.

    Dragovic SM, Agunbiade TA, Freudzon M, Yang J, Hastings AK, Schleicher TR, et al. Immunization with AgTRIO, a protein in anopheles saliva, contributes to protection against Plasmodium infection in mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:523–35.

  29. 29.

    Vaughan AM, Kappe SH, Ploss A, Mikolajczak SA. Development of humanized mouse models to study human malaria parasite infection. Future Microbiol. 2012;7:657–65.

  30. 30.

    Vaughan AM, Mikolajczak SA, Wilson EM, Grompe M, Kaushansky A, Camargo N, et al. Complete Plasmodium falciparum liver-stage development in liver-chimeric mice. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:3618–28.

  31. 31.

    LeDuc RD, Fellers RT, Early BP, Greer JB, Thomas PM, Kelleher NL. The C-score: a Bayesian framework to sharply improve proteoform scoring in high-throughput top down proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:3231–40.

  32. 32.

    Elsworth B, Matthews K, Nie CQ, Kalanon M, Charnaud SC, Sanders PR, et al. PTEX is an essential nexus for protein export in malaria parasites. Nature. 2014;511:587–91.

  33. 33.

    de Koning-Ward TF, Gilson PR, Boddey JA, Rug M, Smith BJ, Papenfuss AT, et al. A newly discovered protein export machine in malaria parasites. Nature. 2009;459:945–9.

  34. 34.

    Calis JJ, Maybeno M, Greenbaum JA, Weiskopf D, De Silva AD, Sette A, et al. Properties of MHC class I presented peptides that enhance immunogenicity. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9:e1003266.

  35. 35.

    Wacker R, Eickel N, Schmuckli-Maurer J, Annoura T, Niklaus L, Khan SM, et al. LC3-association with the parasitophorous vacuole membrane of Plasmodium berghei liver stages follows a noncanonical autophagy pathway. Cell Microbiol. 2017;19:e12754.

  36. 36.

    Schmuckli-Maurer J, Reber V, Wacker R, Bindschedler A, Zakher A, Heussler VT. Inverted recruitment of autophagy proteins to the Plasmodium berghei parasitophorous vacuole membrane. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0183797.

  37. 37.

    Agop-Nersesian C, De Niz M, Niklaus L, Prado M, Eickel N, Heussler VT. Shedding of host autophagic proteins from the parasitophorous vacuolar membrane of Plasmodium berghei. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2191.

  38. 38.

    Agop-Nersesian C, Niklaus L, Wacker R, Theo Heussler V. Host cell cytosolic immune response during Plasmodium liver stage development. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2018;42:324–34.

  39. 39.

    Cooper HJ. To what extent is FAIMS beneficial in the analysis of proteins? J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2016;27:566–77.

  40. 40.

    Guevremont R, Purves R. FAIMS, a new technology for the study of protein structure. Faseb J. 2005;19:A767-A.

  41. 41.

    Hebert AS, Prasad S, Belford MW, Bailey DJ, McAlister GC, Abbatiello SE, et al. Comprehensive single-shot proteomics with FAIMS on a hybrid orbitrap mass spectrometer. Anal Chem. 2018;90:9529–37.

  42. 42.

    Granados DP, Sriranganadane D, Daouda T, Zieger A, Laumont CM, Caron-Lizotte O, et al. Impact of genomic polymorphisms on the repertoire of human MHC class I-associated peptides. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3600.

  43. 43.

    Gilchuk P, Spencer CT, Conant SB, Hill T, Gray JJ, Niu X, et al. Discovering naturally processed antigenic determinants that confer protective T cell immunity. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1976–87.

  44. 44.

    de Verteuil D, Muratore-Schroeder TL, Granados DP, Fortier MH, Hardy MP, Bramoulle A, et al. Deletion of immunoproteasome subunits imprints on the transcriptome and has a broad impact on peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex I molecules. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010;9:2034–47.

  45. 45.

    Florens L, Washburn MP, Raine JD, Anthony RM, Grainger M, Haynes JD, et al. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Nature. 2002;419:520–6.

  46. 46.

    Franke ED, Lucas CM, San Roman E. Antibody response of humans to the circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium vivax. Infect Immun. 1991;59:2836–8.

  47. 47.

    Hoffman SL, Wistar R Jr, Ballou WR, Hollingdale MR, Wirtz RA, Schneider I, et al. Immunity to malaria and naturally acquired antibodies to the circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium falciparum. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:601–6.

  48. 48.

    Swearingen KE, Lindner SE, Flannery EL, Vaughan AM, Morrison RD, Patrapuvich R, et al. Proteogenomic analysis of the total and surface-exposed proteomes of Plasmodium vivax salivary gland sporozoites. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005791.

  49. 49.

    Swearingen KE, Lindner SE, Shi L, Shears MJ, Harupa A, Hopp CS, et al. Interrogating the Plasmodium sporozoite surface: identification of surface-exposed proteins and demonstration of glycosylation on CSP and TRAP by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005606.

  50. 50.

    Franke ED, Sette A, Sacci J Jr, Southwood S, Corradin G, Hoffman SL. A subdominant CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitope from the Plasmodium yoelii circumsporozoite protein induces CTLs that eliminate infected hepatocytes from culture. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3403–11.

  51. 51.

    Regules JA, Cicatelli SB, Bennett JW, Paolino KM, Twomey PS, Moon JE, et al. Fractional third and fourth dose of RTS, S/AS01 malaria candidate vaccine: a Phase 2a controlled human malaria parasite infection and immunogenicity study. J Infect Dis. 2016;214:762–71.

Download references

Acknowledgements

VRG is an Intergovernmental Personnel Act employee of the United States government. KAE is a military service member, EV is a federal employee, and XZ and SH are contracted employees of the US government. This work was prepared as part of our official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that `copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.’ Title 17 U.S.C. 101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Princeton University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in compliance with all applicable federal regulations governing the protection of animals and research. We thank Gary Laevsky and the Nikon Center of Excellence at Princeton University for generous assistance with imaging. The views expressed in this article reflect the results of research conducted by the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the United States Government.

Funding

This work was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Grand Challenges Explorations Round Nine Phase II awarded to VRG (OP1119033), the Military Infectious Diseases Research Program (VRG), the US Navy In-house Laboratory Independent Research Program (ILIR) supported by the Office for Naval Research (VRG), and the National Resource for Translational Proteomics NIH P41 GM108569 to NLK. A.P. is supported by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Award (1015389) for Investigators in Pathogenesis and funds from Princeton University. B.Y.W. was supported by a training grant from the National Institutes of Healths (T32GM007388), is a recipient of an F31 NIH/National Research Service Award Ruth L. Kirschstein Predoctoral award from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a graduate fellowship from the New Jersey Commission on Cancer Research.

Author information

KAE—Designed experiments and analysed results. BW—Contributed to writing of the paper, performed experiments and analysed results. JS—Performed experiments. LG—Performed experiments and analysed results. NK—Analysed results. PT—Analysed results. XZ—Designed and performed experiments. SH—Performed experiments. CM—Analysed results. EV—Designed experiments and analysed results. AP—Contributed to writing the paper, designed experiments and analysed results. VRG—Wrote the paper, designed experiments, and analysed results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Alexander Ploss or Vincent R. Gerbasi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Winer, B., Edgel, K.A., Zou, X. et al. Identification of Plasmodium falciparum proteoforms from liver stage models. Malar J 19, 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3093-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Proteomics
  • Liver stage
  • Top-down
  • Vaccine
  • Antigen
  • Cell-mediated immunity

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.