Skip to main content
Download PDF

Several Plasmodium vivax relapses after correct primaquine treatment in a patient with impaired cytochrome P450 2D6 function

Malaria Journal volume 19, Article number: 259 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Plasmodium vivax malaria is characterized by the presence of dormant liver-stage parasites, called hypnozoites, which can cause malaria relapses after an initial attack. Primaquine, which targets liver hypnozoites, must be used in combination with a schizonticidal agent to get the radical cure. However, relapses can sometimes occur in spite of correct treatment, due to different factors such as a diminished metabolization of primaquine.

Case presentation

In January 2019, a 21 years old woman with residence in Madrid, returning from a trip to Venezuela with clinical symptoms compatible with malaria infection, was diagnosed with vivax malaria. Chloroquine for 3 days plus primaquine for 14 days was the elected treatment. Two months later and after a second trip to Venezuela, the patient presented a second P. vivax infection, which was treated as the previous one. A third P. vivax malaria episode was diagnosed 2 months later, after returning from a trip to Morocco, receiving chloroquine for 3 days but increasing to 28 days the primaquine regimen, and with no more relapses after 6 months of follow up. The genotyping of P. vivax in the three malaria episodes revealed that the same strain was present in the different relapses. Upon confirmation of correct adherence to the treatment, non-description of resistance in the infection area and the highly unlikely re-infection on subsequent trips or stays in Spain, a possible metabolic failure was considered. CYP2D6 encodes the human cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 2D6 (CYP2D6), responsible for primaquine activation. The patient was found to have a CYP2D6*4/*1 genotype, which turns out in an intermediate metabolizer phenotype, which has been related to P. vivax relapses.

Conclusions

The impairment in CYP2D6 enzyme could be the most likely cause of P. vivax relapses in this patient. This highlights the importance of considering the analysis of CYP2D6 gene polymorphisms in cases of P. vivax relapses after a correct treatment and, especially, it should be considered in any study of dosage and duration of primaquine treatment.

Background

The major human malaria parasites are Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about 3.3% of malaria cases in 2018 were caused by P. vivax [1]. This is highly prevalent in Southeast Asia and South America, representing about 75% of malaria cases in America, 50% of cases in Southeast Asia and 29% in Eastern Mediterranean Region [1].

Spain was a malaria-endemic country until 1964, when malaria elimination was declared [2]. Since then, most malaria cases are imported. However, there have been two cases of autochthonous vivax malaria: one in a 48 years old woman in 2010 [3] and one in a 62 years old man in 2014 [4].

Unlike P. falciparum, P. vivax exhibits dormant liver-stage parasites (hypnozoites), which are responsible of malaria relapses weeks or months after the initial attack [5]. In the past, vivax malaria was considered as the benign tertian malaria, with mild symptoms, such as fever, chills or headache; in contrast with the malignant tertian malaria identity attached to the falciparum malaria. However, more and more studies point out P. vivax as a cause of severe malaria, associated with potentially like-threatening conditions [6, 7], and most acute cases of P. vivax are originated from hypnozoites rather than sporozoites [8]. Radical treatment targeting not only the blood stages of the parasite, but also the dormant liver-stage parasites is essential to prevent future relapses. The recommended treatment of uncomplicated vivax malaria is chloroquine, in areas with chloroquine-susceptible infections; or artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in areas with chloroquine-resistant infections [9]. The drug of choice against hypnozoites is primaquine, an 8-aminoquinoline anti-malarial agent [5], although recently, tafenoquine has shown efficacy for the radical cure of vivax malaria [10].

The common use of chloroquine for treating P. vivax infection led to the appearance of resistance years ago. The first suggestion of P. vivax resistance to chloroquine was reported in Papua New Guinea in 1989 [11, 12] and since then, resistance has spread to other countries [13]. Nevertheless, chloroquine continues as the first-line treatment for P. vivax in the Americas, in the Eastern Mediterranean Region and in most countries of Southeast Asia, where still continues to demonstrate high efficacy, except for Indonesia, Myanmar and Timor-Leste [1].

While on the contrary, primaquine has remained since its introduction in 1952 as anti-malaria treatment [14], and no real evidence of primaquine resistance has been identified at the moment. Some cases of primaquine resistance, especially in Southeast Asia, have been described. The first one was in the Chesson strain of P. vivax [15]; however, it was not possible to exclude other factors for the relapses [16]. In addition, different factors have been indicated as responsible of primaquine failures. The proper dose has been pointed out as a key in decreasing the risk of relapsing. The absence or very low doses of primaquine have been associated with recurrences [17, 18], but some studies have shown that the standard adult dose of primaquine (15 mg/day for 14 days) has not been effective and higher doses of primaquine might be needed for a complete parasite eradication [19]. In addition to using the proper dose of primaquine, another important factor is the adherence to medication regimen. A previous study reported more relapses in patients who missed primaquine doses compared to those who completed the primaquine 14-day course, in P. vivax-infected individuals [20]. Another factor to take into account is the possibility of failures in the metabolic activation of primaquine. To eliminate Plasmodium hypnozoites, primaquine has to be activated by the isoenzyme 2D6 of human cytochrome P450 (CYP2D6), which is converted to oxidized metabolites which are responsible for the anti-hypnozoites activity [21,22,23]. CYP2D6 is responsible for the metabolism of 20–25% of clinically used drugs, and there are more than 46 known major CYP2D6 alleles which can be determined and predict a CYP2D6 phenotype of metabolization (poor, intermediate, normal and ultrarapid) [22]. It has been suggested that a reduced primaquine metabolism due to impairments in CYP2D6 function may be related to P. vivax relapses [24,25,26,27].

The aim of this study is to elucidate the reason for several recurrences of vivax malaria in a patient after a correct primaquine treatment, including the possible role of the specific allelic combination of the human CYP2D6.

Case presentation

In January 2019, a 21 years old woman of Venezuelan origin with residence in Madrid, Spain, without any previous history of striking disease, attended the Hospital Universitario de la Princesa in Madrid with episodes of fever, headache, chills and cough for 1 week and diarrhoea for the previous 2 days. She referred to a trip to a coastal area in Venezuela (Higuerote) the previous month, coming back 10 days before she attended to the hospital. Plasmodium vivax malaria was diagnosed after blood thin smear and rapid diagnostic test (RDT) (BinaxNOW Malaria, Abbott) in the Microbiology and Parasitology Department of the hospital. The sample was sent to the Malaria and Parasitic Diseases Laboratory (MAPELab) of Instituto de Salud Carlos III, for further confirmation by molecular methods. Molecular species identification was performed by a nested multiplex PCR (NM-PCR) assay targeting the small sub-unit rDNA gene (SSU rDNA), which comprises two PCR steps: a first PCR assay identifying Plasmodium spp. and human DNA as the internal control; and a second PCR assay targeting P. falciparum, P. vivax, Plasmodium ovale, Plasmodium malariae [28] and Plasmodium knowlesi [29]. The NM-PCR confirmed a P. vivax infection.

The patient was firstly treated with oral chloroquine for 3 days and with 14 days of primaquine phosphate (Durbin LTD, United Kingdom) at the WHO recommended dosage (0.25 mg/kg/day) [9], after checking the normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase function. No other treatments were prescribed. The patient recovered totally and in the follow-up 1 month later she was asymptomatic and without anaemia or other analytical alterations. Two months after the first episode, the patient came back to the hospital with fever, headache and chills after returning from a trip of 12 days to Caracas (Venezuela). Microscopy, RDT and NM-PCR confirmed a P. vivax infection again. The prescribed treatment was the same to the previous episode, chloroquine plus primaquine for 14 days. The patient progressed favourably and the blood smear and the immunochromatography for malaria were negative 1 week later. In the follow-up 1 month later the malaria conventional diagnosis was negative again. However, 2 months later, and after a trip to Morocco, the patient returned to the hospital with fever, chills, fatigue and nausea. Once again, thin blood smear, RDT and NM-PCR were positive for P. vivax infection. Given this third consecutive malaria infection, and due to a high possibility of a therapeutic failure, the treatment was modified to 3 days of chloroquine with 28 days of primaquine. The clinical and parasitological follow-up 1 week and 1 month later were negative for the malaria diagnostic tests (microscopy and RDT). Six months later (February 2020) the patient was asymptomatic and the microscopy and RDT for malaria were negative.

In order to determine if the last two infections were due to recurrences or to re-infections, the P. vivax strains of the three malaria episodes of the patient were genotyped. The genotyping was carried out by analysis of three polymorphic regions (F1, F2 and F3) of the merozoite surface protein-1 gene of P. vivax (Pvmsp-1), by PCR and sequencing. The characterization of the amplified PCR products was performed by analysis of the fragment size, for the polymorphic region F3; and by comparison of the sequences, for polymorphic regions F1 and F2 of Pvmsp-1 gene [30].

The sequences, obtained from amplification of polymorphic F1 and F2 regions, were aligned using ClustalW multiple alignment of the Bioedit Sequence Alignment Editor, version 7.2.5 [31]. They were compared with sequences of the same polymorphic areas of the Pvmsp-1 gene, extracted from GeneBank data base using the AF435639 accession number as the reference sequence. The three sequences corresponding to the patient were equal between themselves and different to most of the compared sequences (Fig. 1). The analysis of PCR product sizes of the Pvmsp-1 PCR F3 showed that the patient’s three samples had the same size, meanwhile P. vivax control strains showed different sizes (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Partial alignment of the patient’s samples sequences (samples 1, 2 and 3) obtained in the Pvmsp-1 PCR F2 with a Plasmodium vivax reference sequence (accession number AF435639) and another Plasmodium vivax strain (sample 4). The alignment is in forward sense (5′–3′). Coloured dots represent an identical nucleotide

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Automatic electrophoresis (QIAxcel, QIAGEN®) of the amplified fragments of the region F3 of the Pvmsp-1. Samples 1, 2 and 3 belonged to the studied patient. Sample 4 was a P. vivax of different origin. Samples from 1 to 4 were amplified by duplicate. `N´ was a negative sample. Fragments of 15 bp and 3000 bp are the internal markers of the automatic electrophoresis

Full size image

The results obtained support that the three malarial episodes were due to recurrences of an initial infection, as the three P. vivax strains isolated from the patient were genetically homologous or closely related, and not due to new infections acquired in her successive trips or in Spain. A possible cause of a recurrence is poor adherence to treatment. However, in this case, the patient ensured that she followed the treatment correctly and there were no reasons to think otherwise. Then, the appearance of recurrences, in the context of a correct treatment, led to analysis to establish if the therapeutic failure could be connected to impairment in the metabolism of the primaquine. In order to analyse the genotype of the CYP2D6 gene of the patient real-time PCR was performed. This technique is able to detect the single nucleotide variants (SNVs) defining the alleles *3 (rs35742686), *4 (rs3892097 and rs1065852), *6 (rs5030655), *9 (rs5030656), *10 (rs1065852), *17 (rs28371706), and *41 (rs28371725) of CYP2D6, using TaqMan® probes which detects the specific and wild-type alleles (TaqMan Genotyping Assay, ThermoFisher Scientific); as well as copy number variants (CNVs) and hybrid genes, using specific probes for intron 2 and exon 9 (TaqMan Copy Number Assay, ThermoFisher Scientific). Testing was performed following manufacturer’s instructions. The detection of *5 allele, a large gene deletion, was performed using conventional PCR [32], followed by automatic electrophoresis analysis (DNA High Resolution Gel Cartridge, QIAxcel, QIAGEN®). The results showed heterozygous positivity for allele *4 (rs3892097 and rs1065852 were detected). Neither other SNVs nor structural variant of CYP2D6 were found.

Discussion

Recurrences of P. vivax parasites in peripheral blood may derive from different sources: from sporozoites of a new infection (re-infection), from sub-patent asexual parasitaemia (recrudescence) due to resistance to the treatment or from hepatic hypnozoites (relapse).

The patient could have been re-infected with a new P. vivax strain during her subsequent trips to Venezuela and to Morocco, or during her stay in Spain. Venezuela is a malaria-endemic country, with 80% of malaria cases caused by P. vivax and with a large increase of malaria cases following the political and economic crisis [1, 33].

On the contrary, Morocco was certified as malaria-free by the WHO in 2010 [34]. Nevertheless, Morocco reports about 100 of imported malaria cases, mostly P. falciparum cases originating from sub-Saharan Africa, and still present is the major vector, Anopheles labranchiae. However, the probability that the re-infection had occurred during her trip to Morocco is very low, because vectors are present in formerly malarious areas and imported malaria cases are often diagnosed in big cities, far from the areas where the entomological risk is high [35]. On the other hand, Spain is a malaria-free country since the early 1960s [2], with two autochthonous cases in the last 10 years in rural areas in the north of the country [3, 4]. In large cities such as Madrid, where the patient resides, the presence of vectors has not been reported, and therefore the probability of local infection is really negligible.

To elucidate the origin of the P. vivax infection after the first episode of malaria, the most common method is genotyping the different strains by PCR and sequencing involving polymorphic regions of specific genes of the parasite [8]; although methods comparing the whole genome sequencing data are more reliable and less susceptible to errors [36]. These molecular genotyping methods are able to discriminate between genetically homologous and heterologous infections, but they are not able to differentiate between a recrudescence or a relapse with a homologous strain [12]. Contrary to general expectation, relapses caused by parasites genetically distinct from those that caused the acute infection have been reported in areas where malaria transmission was low or absent [37]. The genotyping of the three polymorphic regions of the Pvmsp-1 gene showed a 100% concordance in fragment size and sequence in the three clinical episodes. This supports that the patient acquired the initial infection in her first trip to Venezuela and the successive episodes were due to recrudescences or relapses.

Recrudescence due to a chloroquine failure, which means the re-appearance of parasitaemia from the residual blood stage parasites following the therapy, was another possibility for the second and third malaria episodes. However, this is highly unlikely for several reasons. Firstly, after the first and second malaria episodes there was a clinical cure, with no clinical symptoms; and a parasitological cure, with negative results in microscopy and RDT tests in the follow-ups 1 week and 1 month after starting the treatment. A useful measure of chloroquine resistance is the assessment of parasitaemia by day 28 [12, 13, 38], since no recurrent parasitaemia should be noted by that day in patients taking a complete treatment course with an adequate absorption [12, 39], and recurrences beyond day 28 after the full compliance with standard chloroquine therapy could be relapses by chloroquine-sensitive P. vivax [39]. In addition, clearance of parasitaemia assessed by microscopy by day 3 was 100% predictive of chloroquine sensitivity in a previous meta-analysis study [12]. In this case, the patient experienced the recurrence of the infection around two months after the treatment. Secondly, chloroquine resistance was first described in Papua New Guinea and then spread to other parts of the world, including South America [13, 40]. Although Venezuela, the country where the patient probably acquired the infection, has no reported cases of chloroquine resistance at the moment; other nearby countries, as Colombia, Brazil and Guyana, do have reported resistance cases [12], so it is important to be aware and consider this possibility.

Therefore, the most likely explanation is that the cause of the successive recurrences was due to relapses of the first infection. Furthermore, the time from primary attack to first and second relapse was about 2 months, which is compatible with the mean time to relapse established for South America [41].

The relapses may be due to different factors: a lack of adherence to treatment, the use of inappropriate doses, the presence of resistant strains or a failure in treatment related to drug metabolization. The most common cause of a recurrence is poor adherence to treatment. In the case of primaquine, this is highly variable in endemic areas, ranging from 62 to 95% of adherence [42,43,44]. Nevertheless, the patient of this study reinforced that she had completed the full dosage of primaquine in all episodes, and she attended to all follow-up doctor’s appointments. The use of inappropriate doses also can be a possibility, the absence or very low doses of primaquine have been associated with recurrences [17, 18]. However, the patient received primaquine at a dose of 15 mg/day for 14 days, after the first two infections, which is the preventive treatment recommended by the WHO for P. vivax to avoid relapse [9].

On the other hand, some cases of primaquine resistance have been described, but it has been impossible to exclude other causes, as the primaquine dose, the duration of the treatment or the concurrent blood schizonticidal agent administered [14]. In addition, thanks to more recent studies, relapses have been related to impairments in primaquine metabolization.

To eliminate the hypnozoites, primaquine has to be activated by the hepatic isoenzyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), which is also involved in the metabolism and bioactivation of many other different used drugs [45] and is encoded by a highly polymorphic gene [22]. The human CYP2D6 genotype can be determined by molecular techniques and, depending on which combination of alleles is present, phenotypes can be predicted. Although there were discordances in translating the CYP2D6 genotype to a metabolizer phenotype across laboratories, it has been recently standardized [46]. The assigned phenotype is based on an activity score (AS), where each allele has an ‘activity value’ ranging from 0 to 1 (0 for no function, 0.5 for a decreased function, and 1 for a normal function). Poor metabolizer (PM) phenotypes are defined by AS of 0, intermediate metabolizers (IM) are defined by AS from 0 to 1.25, normal metabolizers (NM) are defined by AS from 1.25 to 2.25, and ultrarapid metabolizers (UM) are defined by AS over 2.25 [38]. Recent studies, have established the importance of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on primaquine efficacy [24,25,26,27, 47] showing associations between low-activity CYP2D6 phenotypes (poor and intermediate metabolizers) and P. vivax relapses. In the study of Bennett et al. [24] two out of 25 patients relapsed after an initial P. vivax attack with correct chloroquine and primaquine treatment. These two patients presented intermediate and poor metabolizers of CYP2D6 enzyme, respectively. In addition, a subsequent nested case–control study showed a significant association between the impaired CYP2D6 activity enzyme and the risk of primaquine therapeutic failure in P. vivax infected patients [25].

The molecular analysis of CYP2D6 gene of the patient of this study showed heterozygosity for allele *4, categorized as a non-functional allele [48, 49]. CYP2D6*4 was present in all the Venezuelan populations tested in previous studies [50, 51], and it has similar allele frequencies in populations of Spain and other Latin American countries, as a result of the process of conquest [50]. Other SNVs or structural variant were not detected. However, allele *1, characterized by the absence of any sequence variations, is assigned by default when other SNPs are not detected during testing [52]. Then, the patient presented a CYP2D6 *1/*4 genotype. As *1 allele is a normal function allele (with an activity value of 1), the CYP2D6 *1/*4 genotype turns out in an intermediate metabolizer phenotype (AS = 1) [46]. Therefore, this shows that the patient of this study has an impaired function of CYP2D6 metabolism, resulting in levels of metabolized primaquine inadequate to the task of killing hypnozoites, as prior studies have reported [47, 48]. This fact could also be due to co-morbidities or concomitant medicines that inhibit the cytochrome action, however, our patient did not show other diseases and did not received other treatments, excluding other possible causes.

In this patient, after two episodes of relapse, primaquine regimen was extended from 14 to 28 days, trying to avoid future relapses with a higher dose primaquine regimen, which has been mentioned to be more effective in preventing relapses of P. vivax infection [8, 19, 53]. At the moment, the patient has not suffered any more relapses and in the follow-up six months later since the last P. vivax episode the patient was asymptomatic and the microscopy and RDT for malaria were negative.

Conclusion

The results point out that the two recurrences that the patient suffered were more probably due to two relapses from the first infection acquired in Venezuela. Re-infection from different P. vivax strains and recrudescence due to chloroquine resistance were discharged by genotyping and clinical and parasitological analysis, respectively. Therefore, the most feasible explanation for relapses is a primaquine therapeutic failure. Low primaquine doses and lack of adherence were ruled out, as well as a possible primaquine resistance due to the low credibility of the described cases and, in addition, due to the origin of the infection. Primaquine has to be activated by the hepatic isoenzyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), which is highly polymorphic and depending on the alleles has different levels of activity for drug metabolization. The patient showed an impaired function in CYP2D6 enzyme, due to an intermediate metabolizer phenotype related to specific polymorphisms of CYP2D6 gene, which results in a diminished metabolism. This case report, along with previous studies, points out CYP2D6 as a possible important determinant of efficacy of primaquine against relapse. This highlights the importance of considering the analysis of CYP2D6 gene polymorphisms in cases of P. vivax relapses after a correct treatment and, especially, it should be considered in any study of dosage and duration of primaquine treatment. However, stronger evidence is needed to verify this relationship and to consider other treatment alternatives in cases of P. vivax treatment failures.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Abbreviations

AS:

Activity Score

Bp:

Base pair

CNVs:

Copy number variants

CYP2D6:

Isoenzyme 2D6 of cytochrome P450

CYP2D6:

Gene encoding CYP2D6 enzyme

IM:

Intermediate metabolizer

MAPELab:

Malaria and Parasitic Diseases Laboratory

NM-PCR:

Nested multiplex PCR for malaria

NM:

Normal metabolizer

PM:

Poor metabolizer

RDT:

Rapid Diagnostic Test

SNPs:

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

SNVs:

Single nucleotide variants

SSU rDNA:

Small subunit of the ribosomal DNA

UM:

Ultrarapid metabolizer

References

  1. WHO. World Malaria Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Velasco E, Gomez-Barroso D, Varela C, Diaz O, Cano R. Non-imported malaria in non-endemic countries: a review of cases in Spain. Malar J. 2017;16:260.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Santa-Olalla Peralta P, Vazquez-Torres MC, Latorre-Fandós E, Mairal-Claver P, Cortina-Solano P, Puy-Azón A, et al. First autochthonous malaria case due to Plasmodium vivax since eradication, Spain, October 2010. Euro Surveill. 2010;15:19684.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Centro Nacional de Epidemiología. CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP). Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Resultados de la Vigilancia Epidemiológica de las Enfermedades Transmisibles. Informe Anual. Año 2016. [Internet]. 2016. Accessed 20 March 2020. Available from: https://publicaciones.isciii.es/unit.jsp?unitId=cne.

  5. Dayananda K, Achur R, Gowda DC. Epidemiology, drug resistance, and pathophysiology of Plasmodium vivax malaria. J Vector Borne Dis. 2018;55:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baird JK. Neglect of Plasmodium vivax malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23:533–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baird JK. Evidence and implications of mortality associated with acute Plasmodium vivax malaria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26:36–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rishikesh K, Saravu K. Primaquine treatment and relapse in Plasmodium vivax malaria. Pathog Glob Health. 2016;110:1–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. WHO. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 3rd Edn. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2015.

  10. Llanos-Cuentas A, Lacerda MVG, Hien TT, Vélez ID, Namaik-larp C, Chu CS, et al. Tafenoquine versus primaquine to prevent relapse of Plasmodium vivax malaria. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:229–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rieckmann KH, Davis DR, Hutton DC. Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine? Lancet. 1989;334:1183–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Price RN, von Seidlein L, Valecha N, Nosten F, Baird JK, White NJ. Global extent of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:982–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Marques MM, Costa MRF, Santana Filho FS, Vieira JLF, Nascimento MTS, Brasil LW, et al. Plasmodium vivax chloroquine resistance and anemia in the western Brazilian Amazon. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:342–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernando D, Rodrigo C, Rajapakse S. Primaquine in vivax malaria: an update and review on management issues. Malar J. 2011;10:351.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrman FC, Ellis JM, Young MD. Plasmodium vivax Chesson strain. Science. 1945;101:377.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Collins WE, Jeffery GM. Primaquine resistance in Plasmodium vivax. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996;55:243–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Commons RJ, Simpson JA, Thriemer K, Humphreys GS, Abreha T, Alemu SG, et al. The effect of chloroquine dose and primaquine on Plasmodium vivax recurrence: a WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network systematic review and individual patient pooled meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:1025–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. John GK, Douglas NM, von Seidlein L, Nosten F, Baird J, White NJ, et al. Primaquine radical cure of Plasmodium vivax: a critical review of the literature. Malar J. 2012;11:280.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas D, Tazerouni H, Sundararaj KGS, Cooper JC. Therapeutic failure of primaquine and need for new medicines in radical cure of Plasmodium vivax. Acta Trop. 2016;160:35–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takeuchi R, Lawpoolsri S, Imwong M, Kobayashi J, Kaewkungwal J, Pukrittayakamee S, et al. Directly-observed therapy (DOT) for the radical 14-day primaquine treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria on the Thai-Myanmar border. Malar J. 2010;9:308.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pybus BS, Marcsisin SR, Jin X, Deye G, Sousa JC, Li Q, et al. The metabolism of primaquine to its active metabolite is dependent on CYP 2D6. Malar J. 2013;12:212.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Marcsisin SR, Reichard G, Pybus BS. Primaquine pharmacology in the context of CYP 2D6 pharmacogenomics: current state of the art. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;161:1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baird JK. 8-Aminoquinoline therapy for latent malaria. Clin Microbiol Reviews. 2019;32:e00011–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bennett JW, Pybus BS, Yadava A, Tosh D, Sousa JC, McCarthy WF, et al. Primaquine failures and cytochrome P-450 2D6 in Plasmodium vivax malaria. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1381–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baird JK, Louisa M, Noviyanti R, Ekawati L, Elyazar I, Subekti D, et al. Association of impaired cytochrome P450 2D6 activity genotype and phenotype with therapeutic efficacy of primaquine treatment for latent Plasmodium vivax malaria. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e181449.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Daher A, Aljayyoussi G, Pereira D, Lacerda MVG, Alexandre MAA, Nascimento CT, et al. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of chloroquine and artemisinin-based combination therapy with primaquine. Malar J. 2019;18:325.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Silvino ACR, Kano FS, Costa MA, Fontes CJF, Soares IS, de Brito CFA, et al. Novel insights into Plasmodium vivax therapeutic failure: CYP2D6 activity and time of exposure to malaria modulate the risk of recurrence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e02056.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubio J, Post R, van Leeuwen W, Henry M-C, Lindergard G, Hommel M. Alternative polymerase chain reaction method to identify Plasmodium species in human blood samples: the semi-nested multiplex malaria PCR (SnM-PCR). Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;96(1):S199–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miguel-Oteo M, Jiram AI, Ta-Tang TH, Lanza M, Hisam S, Rubio JM. Nested multiplex PCR for identification and detection of human Plasmodium species including Plasmodium knowlesi. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2017;10:299–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Imwong M, Pukrittayakamee S, Grüner A, Rénia L, Letourneur F, Looareesuwan S, et al. Practical PCR genotyping protocols for Plasmodium vivax using Pvcs and Pvmsp1. Malar J. 2005;4:20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hall T. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41.

  32. Steen V, Andreassen O, Daly A, Tefre T, Borresen A, Idle J, et al. Detection of the poor metabolizer-associated CYP2D6(D) gene deletion allele by long-PCR Technology. Pharmacogenetics. 1995;5:215–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Espinosa L, Mirinaviciute G. Health crisis in Venezuela: status of communicable diseases and implications for the European Union and European Economic Area, May 2019. Euro Surveill. 2019;24:1900308.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Saoud M, Ezzariga N, Benaissa E, Moustachi A, Lyagoubi M, Aoufi S. Imported malaria: 54 cases diagnosed at the Ibn Sina Hospital Center in Rabat, Morocco. Med Sante Trop. 2019;29:159–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Adlaoui E, Faraj C, El Bouhmi M, El Aboudi A, Ouahabi S, Tran A, et al. Mapping malaria transmission risk in Northern Morocco using entomological and environmental data. Malar Res Treat. 2011;2011:391463.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bright AT, Manary MJ, Tewhey R, Arango EM, Wang T, Schork NJ, et al. A High resolution case study of a patient with recurrent Plasmodium vivax infections shows that relapses were caused by meiotic siblings. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2882.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Imwong M, Snounou G, Pukrittayakamee S, Tanomsing N, Kim JR, Nandy A, et al. Relapses of Plasmodium vivax infection usually result from activation of heterologous hypnozoites. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:927–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Howes RE, Battle KE, Mendis KN, Smith DL, Cibulskis RE, Baird JK, et al. Global epidemiology of Plasmodium vivax. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95:15–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Baird JK, Leksana B, Masbar S, Fryauff DJ, Sutanihardja MA, et al. Diagnosis of resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax: timing of recurrence and whole blood chloroquine levels. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;56:621–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gonçalves LA, Cravo P, Ferreira MU. Emerging Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine in South America: an overview. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109:534–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Battle KE, Karhunen MS, Bhatt S, Gething PW, Howes RE, Golding N, et al. Geographical variation in Plasmodium vivax relapse. Malar J. 2014;13:144.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Grietens KP, Soto V, Erhart A, Ribera JM, Toomer E, Tenorio A, et al. Adherence to 7-day primaquine treatment for the radical cure of P vivax in the Peruvian Amazon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82:1017–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Pereira EA, Ishikawa EA, Fontes CJ. Adherence to Plasmodium vivax malaria treatment in the Brazilian Amazon Region. Malar J. 2011;10:355.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Cheoymang A, Ruenweerayut R, Muhamad P, Rungsihirunrat K, Na-Bangchang K. Patients’ adherence and clinical effectiveness of a 14-day course of primaquine when given with a 3-day chloroquine in patients with Plasmodium vivax at the Thai-Myanmar border. Acta Trop. 2015;152:151–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gaedigk A, Freeman N, Hartshorne T, Riffel AK, Irwin D, Bishop JR, et al. SNP genotyping using TaqMan® technology: the CYP2D6*17 assay conundrum. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9257.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Caudle KE, Sangkuhl K, Whirl-Carrillo M, Swen JJ, Haidar CE, Klein TE, et al. Standardizing CYP 2D6 genotype to phenotype translation: consensus recommendations from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13:116–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dijanic C, Nickerson J, Shakya S, Dijanic A, Fabbri M. Relapsing malaria: a case report of primaquine resistance. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2018;2018:9720823.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ingram RJH, Crenna-Darusallam C, Soebianto S, Noviyanti R, Baird J. The clinical and public health problem of relapse despite primaquine therapy: case review of repeated relapses of Plasmodium vivax acquired in Papua New Guinea. Malar J. 2014;13:488.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. CPIC® Guideline for Tamoxifen based on CYP2D6 genotype [Internet]. Accessed 10 Apr 2020. Available from: https://cpicpgx.org/guidelines/cpic-guideline-for-tamoxifen-based-on-cyp2d6-genotype/.

  50. Griman P, Moran Y, Valero G, Loreto M, Borjas L, Chiurillo MA. CYP2D6 gene variants in urban/admixed and Amerindian populations of Venezuela: pharmacogenetics and anthropological implications. Ann Hum Biol. 2012;39:137–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Moreno N, Flores-Angulo C, Villegas C, Mora Y. CYP2D6 variability in populations from Venezuela. Drug Metab Pers Ther. 2016;31:181–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gene-specific Information Tables for CYP2D6. PharmGKB. [Internet]. Accessed 18 Apr 2020. Available from: https://www.pharmgkb.org/page/cyp2d6RefMaterials.

  53. Baird JK, Hoffman SL. Primaquine therapy for malaria. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1336–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the patient for supporting this work, for her consent and for providing all the information that has been requested.

Funding

This work was funded by project PI17CIII/00035, from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ministry of Science and Innovation).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Malaria and Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, National Microbiology Center, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

    Alexandra Martin Ramírez, Marta Lanza Suárez, María Josefa Bernal Fernández & José Miguel Rubio

  2. Genetics Department, CatLab, Barcelona, Spain

    Carlos Lombardia González

  3. Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain

    Tamara Soler Maniega & Diego Domingo García

  4. Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain

    Ángela Gutierrez Liarte

Authors
  1. Alexandra Martin Ramírez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos Lombardia González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tamara Soler Maniega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ángela Gutierrez Liarte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Diego Domingo García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marta Lanza Suárez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. María Josefa Bernal Fernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. José Miguel Rubio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JMR and DDG conceptualized the study. JMR, AMR, CLG designed the experiments. JMR provided training and supervision for the procedures. AGL attended to the patient. AMR, TSM, CLG, MLS, MJB, JMR performed the experiments. All authors contributed to the writing of the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Miguel Rubio.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient of the study for publication of this case report after explanation of the aims of the report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they do not have competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin Ramírez, A., Lombardia González, C., Soler Maniega, T. et al. Several Plasmodium vivax relapses after correct primaquine treatment in a patient with impaired cytochrome P450 2D6 function. Malar J 19, 259 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03326-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03326-1

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us