Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A rapid quality control test to foster the development of the sterile insect technique against Anopheles arabiensis

Abstract

Background

With the fight against malaria reportedly stalling there is an urgent demand for alternative and sustainable control measures. As the sterile insect technique (SIT) edges closer to becoming a viable complementary tool in mosquito control, it will be necessary to find standardized techniques of assessing male quality throughout the production system and post-irradiation handling. Flight ability is known to be a direct marker of insect quality. A new version of the reference International Atomic Energy Agency/Food and Agricultural Organization (IAEA/FAO) flight test device (FTD), modified to measure the flight ability and in turn quality of male Anopheles arabiensis within a 2-h period via a series of verification experiments is presented.

Methods

Anopheles arabiensis juveniles were mass reared in a rack and tray system. 7500 male pupae were sexed under a stereomicroscope (2500 per treatment). Stress treatments included irradiation (with 50, 90, 120 or 160 Gy, using a Gammacell 220), chilling (at 0, 4, 8 and 10 °C) and compaction weight (5, 15, 25, and 50 g). Controls did not undergo any stress treatment. Three days post-emergence, adult males were subjected to either chilling or compaction (or were previously irradiated at pupal stage), after which two repeats (100 males) from each treatment and control group were placed in a FTD to measure flight ability. Additionally, one male was caged with 10 virgin females for 4 days to assess mating capacity (five repeats). Survival was monitored daily for a period of 15 days on remaining adults (two repeats).

Results

Flight ability results accurately predicted male quality following irradiation, with the first significant difference occurring at an irradiation dose of 90 Gy, a result which was reflected in both survival and insemination rates. A weight of 5 g or more significantly reduced flight ability and insemination rate, with survival appearing less sensitive and not significantly impacted until a weight of 15 g was imposed. Flight ability was significantly reduced after treatments at 4 °C with the insemination rate more sensitive to chilling with survival again less sensitive (8 and 0 °C, respectively).

Conclusions

The reported results conclude that the output of a short flight ability test, adapted from the previously tested Aedes FTD, is an accurate indicator of male mosquito quality and could be a useful tool for the development of the SIT against An. arabiensis.

Background

Malaria is a disease that still accounts for almost half a million deaths each year. The latest report published by the World Health Organization (WHO) on malaria highlighted that although fewer deaths were reported in 2017, the success in global malaria control has stalled [1]. Such statistics underline the urgency for alternative complementary control measures. The sterile insect technique (SIT) is one of several genetic control measures routinely used throughout the world to suppress, contain or eradicate various species of agricultural, veterinary or human insect pests [2,3,4]. A technique which has proved successful and sustainable, particularly when deployed as part of an area-wide integrated pest management programme (AW-IPM).

Despite strong efforts in the 1970s and 1980s to roll out the technique against mosquitoes, one of the most devastating vectors of human disease, efforts were more or less abandoned until recent years. A build-up of insecticide resistance coupled with the global spread of species, such as Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, has reignited interest in developing mosquito SIT as part of an AW-IPM approach, with the technique progressing towards implementation at an operational level. Mass-rearing technology has been standardized [5,6,7] and guidelines created for key vectors including Anopheles arabiensis [8], Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus [9]. More recently, research has arisen addressing some key elements of the handling, transport and release aspects of a mosquito SIT programme. Optimal transportation conditions have been advised for An. arabiensis [10] in addition to a study investigating various release conditions for both An. arabiensis and Ae. aegypti [11].

The ability of an insect to perform flight is known to be a direct marker of their quality [12]. Poor fliers will be unable to complete their primary goal which is to seek out and mate with wild females. Thus, it is imperative that in any SIT programme, insects released are of adequate quality. Quality control (QC) checks must be carried out routinely throughout critical steps of the mass-rearing process and both pre- and post-release. Flight cylinders that can gauge flight ability have consistently been reported to be an accurate indicator of mating competitiveness and are routinely used as a QC tool in fruit fly, tsetse fly and moth SIT programmes [13, 14]. Such cylinders offer an easy to use, portable and rapid means of estimating sterile insect quality both pre- and post-release.

Until recently, flight mills were the only method of assessing flight ability. Such tools require a high level of skill and the process of the flight test can be lengthy. The first mosquito QC tool was reported by Balestrino et al. [15] which measured the flight ability of recently emerged Ae. albopictus from pupae that had been placed in 1 of 100 individual wells. Despite promising results, the test itself required a period of 48 to 72 h to complete. However, the basis of this device was used to create a new flight cylinder that could measure the flight ability of 100 adult Ae. aegypti or Ae. albopictus mosquitoes within a 2-h period. A series of 10 prototypes were created and verified by a series of stress treatments such as irradiation, chilling temperature and compaction [16]. The final device is now considered as the IAEA reference QC test for Aedes mosquitoes.

In order to expand the applicability of this device to An. arabiensis, it was necessary to first modify the diameter of the individual flight tubes. Initial experiments in the Aedes device with male An. arabiensis were unsuccessful as their larger body size prevented them from completing vertical flight to escape the tubes. A new prototype FTD was constructed in exactly the same manner as with the first version for male Aedes mosquitoes with one simple adaptation; the diameter of each individual flight tube was increased from 8 to 10 mm. Preliminary experiments with the new prototype proved successful and thus a series of 10 new FTDs were constructed in order to validate the flight ability test as an indicator of overall quality via a series of stress treatment experiments as was done when validating the initial FTD for male Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Male An. arabiensis were exposed to a range of irradiation doses, chilling temperatures and levels of compaction and subsequent flight ability measure. To further link flight ability to quality, male survival and mating capacity were also investigated as reference tests (Additional files 1, 2, 3).

Methods

Mosquito colony source and mass rearing procedure

All experiments were undertaken using the Dongola strain of Anopheles arabiensis sourced from the Northern State of Sudan (Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Khartoum). The laboratory colony was maintained at the Insect Pest Control Laboratory (IPCL) of the joint Food and Agricultural Organisation/International Atomic Energy Agency (FAO/IAEA) Division of Nuclear Techniques and Agriculture, Seibersdorf, Austria since 2005. Larvae were mass-reared in plastic trays held in a mechanized stainless-steel rack developed at the IPCL [6]. Eggs were quantified using the method defined in Maiga et al. [7] wherein 4000 eggs are added to each tray, containing 4 l of deionized water, within a plastic ring which floats on the water surface. Water was added to each tray 24 h before the addition of the eggs to allow the temperature of the water to acclimatize to that of the ambient air temperature. Larvae were fed daily on a 1% (wt/vol) diet developed by the IAEA and described in [17], following the feeding regime described in the guidelines for mass rearing Anopheles mosquitoes [18]. Larvae were maintained in a large climate-controlled room (88 m2) with temperature and humidity maintained at 30 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH, respectively.

Adults were maintained under controlled temperature, RH and light regimes (27 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH, 12:12 h light:dark (L:D) photoperiod with 1 h periods of simulated dawn and dusk). Eggs were generated and gathered for all experiments following the An. arabiensis mass-rearing guidelines developed at the IPCL [8]. Mosquitoes were housed in standard plastic rearing cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm—Bugdorm, Taipei, Taiwan) and provided with constant access to a 5% sugar solution until day 3 when experiments were performed. Mosquito maintenance and the age of the adults at the time all described experiments were performed were chosen to reflect what may occur in a mass rearing facility prior to a release of sterile males. Despite An. arabiensis males reaching sexual maturity within 48 h of emergence, males younger than 3 days old display low insemination rates [19]. There were two replicates for each stress treatment in addition to two control samples for each experiment performed.

Irradiation procedure and experimental design

On the first morning that pupation was noted (7 days after eggs were placed in the trays), the rack was tilted. Pupae and larvae were separated by adding them to an Erlenmayer flask containing dechlorinated water and swirling to create a vortex. The difference in buoyancy and swimming behaviour between the larvae and pupae, during which the pupae rise to the surface and the larvae swim downwards, allows an accurate separation of the two life stages [20]. The first observed pupae were discarded from the experiment and the larvae placed back into mass rearing trays. After a period of 2 h, pupae were then separated from the larvae once more ensure that the age of the experimental pupae was between 0 and 2 h. Pupae were handled using disposable transparent pipettes. Males were separated from females by distinguishing differences in their genitalia under a stereomicroscope while placed on a transparent petri dish lid [20]. Pupae were irradiated at 24 ± 2 h in batches of 250 inside a self-contained 60Co Gamma Cell 220 (Nordion Ltd, Kanata, Ontario, Canada). A dosimetry system using Gafchromic MD film was used to verify absorbed dose. A range of irradiation doses required to induce full sterility and beyond, and thus expected to reduce the quality of the adult males, were selected. Control males were taken to the Gamma Cell room but not placed inside or exposed to any irradiation dose whilst experimental males received a dose of 50, 90, 120 or 160 Gray (Gy).

Chilling procedure and experimental design

Following on from previously reported research from IPCL [10], a range of chilling temperatures that were known to be tolerable (4, 8 and 10 °C), were selected, A lower temperature of 0 °C was chosen with the intention to reduce quality post-chilling as it was beyond the range of temperatures previously tested and found to be tolerable. On day 3, cages of 250 adult males were immobilized at each of the above temperatures for a period of 2 h, with control males left under insectary conditions (27 ± 1 °C).

Compaction procedure and experimental design

On day 3, batches of 250 adult male An. arabiensis were immobilized at 10 °C for a period of 2 h. As noted above, 10 °C has been found not to impact quality. During immobilization, as described above, adult males were subject to varying levels of compaction by being placed under a mosquito substitute particle—cumin seeds. Cumin seeds were selected after analysing the morphological properties and weights of several substitute particles such as fennel, rice, anise and poppy seeds. Cumin seeds were found to best match the weight and characteristics of adult mosquitoes and were thus selected.5, 15, 25 or 50 g of cumin seeds were weighed, wrapped in mesh and sealed with an elastic band corresponding to 0, 0.25, 0.76, 1.27 and 2.55 g/cm2 respectively.

Assessing survival rate and mating propensity as a measure of quality

The aim was to link post stress-treatment flight ability with survival rate and mating capacity which are known quality parameters. Firstly, survival rate was measured by removing and quantifying the number of dead adults in both experimental and control cages for 15 days post stress-treatment in both replicates. The number of adults available for the longevity experiment (N), after flight ability and mating capacity tests, ranged between 117 and 227 for the irradiation experiment. For the chilling and compaction experiments, N ranged between 106–149 and 77–112, respectively. Mating capacity was evaluated by placing a single control or experimental male from each treatment into a standard cage (30 × 30 × 30 cm) with 10 virgin females from the same cohort for a period of 5 days, with continued access to a 5% sugar solution. Females were then dissected and the spermatheca removed and viewed under a stereomicroscope for the presence or absence of sperm to clarify the insemination rate. Five repetitions were carried out for both the control and experimental treatments.

Flight test device and experimental procedure

A flight test device (FTD), created within the IPCL as a QC tool for Aedes mosquitoes by measuring their flight ability [16], was adapted to compensate for the slightly larger body size of An. arabiensis males. The modified FTD consists of 22 transparent acrylic plastic (Polymethyl methacrylate—PMAA) tubes which are in turn housed within a larger PMAA tube. Any remaining gaps between the tubes were filled with silicon. A final larger PMAA tube which creates a containment area after the males exit the flight tubes surrounds the inner two series of tubes (all dimensions remain as described by Culbert et al. [16] except for the individual flight tube internal diameter which increased from 8 to 10 mm). The flight ability test was conducted by mouth aspirating a sample of 100 male mosquitoes into the entry hole at the base of the FTD, with 2 repetitions for the control and each experimental group. Adults were allowed a period of 2 h to escape following which, the number of mosquitoes remaining at the base of the FTD and those that had escaped were counted. Flight ability is determined by dividing the number of adults that had escaped the flight tubes by the total number that began the experiment.

Further assessment of the flight test device: effect of light and time to pupation on the flight ability

It is known that wild Anopheles males are flight active mainly at the onset of dusk, especially around time of sunset for swarming/mating and/or sugar meal [21, 22]. To integrate the impact of daily activity pattern of Anopheles mosquitoes on the flight ability test, the flight ability of An. arabiensis was evaluated in two simulated light conditions: day light (390.2 Lux) and dusk (3.9 Lux). Mosquitoes were submitted to dusk conditions 30 min prior to the tests. For each light condition, flight tests were performed on 2 groups of mosquitoes separately: (1) Mosquitoes were chilled in a climatic chamber at 4  °C for 2 h and then kept under insectary conditions (27 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH) for 90 min prior to the test. Mosquitoes were from the first pupa collection day (day 7 from seeding the eggs). (2) Mosquitoes were irradiated at pupal stage (24 ± 2 h old) at 90 Gy and kept under insectary conditions (27 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH) until tests were performed. Mosquitoes were from the second pupae collection day (day 8). A control group (not chilled and not irradiated) was used in each test. Tests were performed between 9 and 12 a.m. for the day light conditions and between 4 and 7 p.m. for the dusk conditions. Mosquitoes were kept for 30 min under dusk conditions prior to the flight tests. Three replicates were performed for all treatments (control, chilled, irradiated) in each light condition. Only the flight ability was measured. To assess the effect of time to pupation on the flight ability, data from the control groups (pupae collected on day 7 and those on day 8) were compared. Then, 6 replicates were considered for each control group. The data for control groups, chilled and irradiated groups were also compared to the results obtained for same treatments in former experiments to assess the repeatability of flight ability measures.

Statistical analysis

To analyse the impact of the various stress treatments on day 15 survival rates, insemination rates and escape rates from the flight test device (response variables), binomial linear mixed effect models were used. Repetitions were treated as random effects and the treatment levels for irradiation, chilling and compaction were then used as fixed effects. The likelihood ratio test [23, 24] was used to ascertain the significance of the fixed effects. Binomial linear mixed effect models were also used to determine if the escape rate could be used to predict the other QC parameters (day 15 survival rates and insemination rates). This was achieved by using the QC parameters as response variables and the escape rate as a fixed effect. To describe the proportion of variance explained by the model between the observed and predicted values, the R2 (coefficient of determination) was then used [25, 26]. P-values and fixed-effects coefficients of all models used for data analysis can be found in Additional file 4: Tables S1–S9. To analyse the data from light intensity and time to pupation experiments, general linear mixed models were used with the treatments (chilling, irradiation, light condition, time to pupation) as fixed effects, the flight ability as response variable and replicates as random effects. The outputs can be found in Additional file 4: Tables S10–S12.

Results

Impact of treatments on survival and insemination rates

The survival and insemination rate of male Anopheles arabiensis was significantly reduced at a dose of 90 Gy or more (Figs. 1, 2, Additional file 4: Table S1 and S4, P = 0.043, P = 0.016). Interestingly, only exposure to the lowest chilling temperature (0 °C) significantly reduced survival (Additional file 5: Fig. S1, Additional file 4: Table S2, P = 0.006), however, exposure to 8 °C or less caused a significant decrease in the insemination rate (Fig. 2, Additional file 4: Table S5, P = 0.030). A compaction weight of 15 g was found to significantly decrease survival (Additional file 6: Fig. S2, Additional file 4: Table S3, P = 0.003), whilst a weight equal to 5 g or more caused a significant impact upon the insemination rate (Fig. 2, Additional file 4: Table S6, P = 0.012).

Fig. 1
figure1

The survival rates of male Anopheles arabiensis subject to a range of irradiation doses for 15 days. Significant differences between the control group (no irradiation) and treatment groups (50, 90, 120 and 160 Gy) are represented as follows (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). Individual values of the various replicates are indicated in light grey and mean values shown as a solid line

Fig. 2
figure2

The insemination rates of male Anopheles arabiensis males subject to a range of stress treatments. a Represents the impact of various irradiation doses, b represents the impact of chilling temperature and c various compaction weights. The median value and the quartiles, horizontal bars the 95% percentiles and dots the minimal and maximal values are shown in each Boxplot with significant differences between treatment groups and the control group denoted as follows (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)

Impact of treatments on flight ability

The results given show that the flight ability of male An. arabiensis is harmed by conditions of a 90 Gy dose or above, 4 °C and below and compaction of 5 g (Fig. 3, Additional file 4: Tables S7–S9, P < 0.001, P = 0.007, P = 0.009). Overall, results showed that flight ability is an accurate parameter of QC as it appeared to be sensitive to each of the various stress treatments imposed upon male An. arabiensis (Fig. 4, Table 1). It explained 48–98% of the variance of survival rates and 72–90% of the variance observed in insemination rates depending on the stress treatment considered. All three QC parameters significantly decreased at a dose of 90 Gy and above. Flight ability and insemination rates were most sensitive to excessive compaction (5 g). Flight ability was less sensitive to chilling (4 °C) in comparison to insemination rate (8 °C) but more sensitive than survival (0 °C).

Fig. 3
figure3

The escape rates of male Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes subject to a range of stress treatments. a Represents the impact of various irradiation doses, b represents the impact of chilling temperature and c various compaction weights. The median value and the quartiles, horizontal bars the 95% percentiles and dots the minimal and maximal values are shown in each Boxplot with significant differences between treatment groups and the control group denoted as follows (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)

Fig. 4
figure4

Male Anopheles arabiensis during a flight ability test

Table 1 Use of the male escape rates from the flight test device to predict adult male quality parameters in Anopheles arabiensis

Further assessment of the flight test device confirmed that male An. arabiensis flight ability was significantly reduced when chilled at 4 °C for 2 h (Fig. 5, Additional file 4: Table S10, P < 0.001) or irradiated at 90 Gy (Fig. 6, Additional file 4: Table S11, P = 0.0387). However, the light did not impact the flight ability. Indeed, the best models excluded this factor. In addition, flight ability was not affected by the batch of pupa collection (first or second day of collection) (Additional file 4: Table S12, P = 0.334). Finally, the flight ability of chilled (4 °C) and control groups were compared between the first and second experiments (different operators and experiment conducted 1 year later) and no significant difference was observed (the best model did not retain the experiment number). The same result was obtained when comparing the irradiated and control groups of the two experiments. This showed a good repeatability of the flight ability tests.

Fig. 5
figure5

The escape rates of male Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes subject to chilling at 4 °C in function of the light intensity

Fig. 6
figure6

The escape rates of male Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes subject to irradiation at 90 Gy in function of the light intensity

Discussion

In any release campaign, with a sterile component, it is imperative that the insects released are of adequate quality, with a maximal lifespan and minimal damage. Colonization, mass rearing, irradiation and handling are just a few examples of factors that can reduce male quality. One method of estimating insect quality is to measure their flight ability, a known reliable marker [12]. Following the development and verification of a novel flight test device to assess the quality of male Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus [16], a similar tool was created for male An. arabiensis.

The irradiation process is a crucial part of the SIT. It is critical to administer an irradiation dose that ensures a sufficient level of sterility without impacting subsequent survival and male quality, as it is well recognized that ionizing radiation can significantly decrease subsequent field competitiveness [27]. A dose of 90 Gy or more caused a significant decrease in flight ability, survival and insemination rates in An. arabiensis males. These results mirror those of an earlier study in which Ae. aegypti males exposed to 90 Gy or more displayed the same significantly reduced quality across all measured parameters [16]. It was postulated that administering a dose of 90 Gy, which falls between the partially (70 Gy) and fully sterile irradiation dose (120 Gy), to An. arabiensis males, would not cause a significant decrease in quality as previous studies have shown that they are still competitive even at a dose of 120 Gy [28]. As suggested previously, studies must be carried out in which male competitiveness is assessed either in semi-field or field conditions and directly compared to flight ability. It may be that flight ability offers a more accurate depiction of male mosquito quality than competitiveness measured in semi-field conditions and warrants further investigation.

Sterile insects are routinely released in a chilled state after being immobilized to facilitate the ease of their handling during their packing and transportation from the rearing facility to the release site. It seems logical to assume that a release campaign involving mosquitoes will involve a similar process as to what is currently used in other insects including Mediterranean fruit flies [14] and tsetse flies [13] and thus understanding how chilling temperature impacts male quality is fundamental to a successful campaign. A previously reported study conducted within the IPCL laboratory [10], exposed male An. arabiensis to a range of chilling temperatures for various durations and concluded that only exposure to 2 °C, the coldest temperature tested, for 24 h, the longest duration tested, significantly reduced survival in comparison to non-chilled control males. Therefore, it was suspected that only the lowest chilling temperature of 0 °C would significantly reduce survival. This was indeed found to be the case and, additionally, it reflects the findings of the initial verification experiments of the FTD created for Ae. aegypti males [16]. Despite the lesser effect of chilling temperature on male survival, regardless of species, flight ability and insemination rate are more sensitive. Significant decreases in insemination rate are apparent at 8 °C in both An. arabiensis and Ae. aegypti, whilst flight ability begins to decline at 4 and 8 °C, respectively. The impact of chilling temperature upon male quality does appear to be species-specific and thus what seems appropriate for one should not automatically be inferred for another.

The absence of impact of light on flight ability may be attributed to the attractive effect of the BG lure (Biogents, Regensburg, Germany) used in the tests. In addition, this might be explained by the adaptation of the strain to the laboratory conditions where males do not need to join swarms to mate. The result indicates that the flight ability test can be performed at any time of the day and also show a good repeatability. Moreover, the similarity of males from the first and second days of pupa collection indicates that these groups of males might be similar in fitness and then both may be considered for releases in SIT programmes.

To ensure the cost-effectiveness of a mosquito SIT programme, it is necessary to determine the maximum number of mosquitoes that can be transported in any given container without impacting their quality, or in other words the maximum tolerable level of compaction. The lowest compaction weight (5 g) was found to significantly decrease both flight ability and insemination rate. This is consistent with an earlier study conducted within the IPCL laboratory where male An. arabiensis, immobilized under high and low levels of compaction, did not differ in survival but did demonstrate a significantly reduced survival compared to controls under no compaction [10]. It also echoes results in the initial verification studies of the FTD using male Ae. aegypti where flight ability was also found to be significantly reduced following compaction in excess of 5 g [16]. Interestingly, An. arabiensis survival only began to significantly decrease following 15 g of compaction. Although males may be surviving after compaction under this weight, their quality was reduced as shown by their inability to fly and thus inseminate females, as is reflected in the significantly lower survival and insemination rate observed after 5 g of compaction. This finding is in keeping with a study recently published wherein several quantities (10, 40 and 240) of male Ae. aegypti were compacted into volumes of 1 cm3 and shipped across the USA [29]. Results indicated that survival was highest following the greatest level of compaction (240/cm3) however, a higher degree of damage was observed on the adults post-shipping. Similar outcomes from both studies highlights that not only do male mosquitoes need to survive the various stressors they encounter until their ultimate release, they need to be of an adequate quality. Survival is fruitless if they are damaged and in turn are unable to fly and mate with wild females, further facilitating the need for urgent QC tools such as the FTD.

The results of this series of experiments to validate a novel QC tool adds further support for the original version reported last year [16]. Once again, a strong correlation between flight ability and overall male quality was noted. The FTD offers a rapid and easy way of gaining insight into the quality of sterile male mosquitoes and is currently the only known tool available with such capabilities. All technical drawings of the FTD for An. arabiensis and also Ae. aegypti and albopictus, to allow accurate reproduction of the device, are available on website (http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/manuals-ipc.html).

Conclusion

In this study, results are reported from a series of verification experiments to validate a novel tool to enable the quality of An. arabiensis to be gauged, following minor adaptations from the original version created for Aedes mosquitoes. Adult males were subjected to varying levels of three different stress treatments (irradiation, chilling temperature and compaction weight) before conducting flight ability tests in the FTD. Survival and insemination rate were measured as standard reference tests and compared to flight ability to ascertain if there was a correlation. As seen in the original FTD, a new version modified for An. arabiensis, can accurately predict male quality and thus adds a valuable tool to the SIT toolbox. Further research could be performed to determine its suitability for use in other genetic control programmes.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article (and its Additional files 1, 2, 3, 4).

Abbreviations

FAO:

Food and Agricultural Organization

IAEA:

International Atomic Energy Agency

IPCL:

Insect Pest Control Laboratory

LD:

light:dark

QC:

quality control

RH:

relative humidity

SIT:

sterile insect technique

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    WHO. World malaria report 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

  2. 2.

    Snow J. Radiation, insects and eradication in North America: an overview from screwworm to bollworm: In: Modern Insect Control: Nuclear Techniques and Biotechnology. Proceedings of a symposium jointly organized by IAEA/FAO, Vienna, November 1987. IAEA-SM-301/29; 1988. p. 3–13.

  3. 3.

    Vreysen M, Saleh K, Ali M, Abdulla A, Zhu Z, Juma K, et al. Glossina austeni (Diptera: Glossinidae) eradicated on the island of Unguja, Zanzibar, using the sterile insect technique. J Econ Entomol. 2000;93:123–35.

  4. 4.

    Dyck V, Reyes J, Vreysen M, Fernandez E, Teruya T, Barnes B, et al. Management of area-wide integrated pest management programmes that integrate the sterile insect technique. In: Hendrichs J, Robinson AS, editors. Sterile insect technique. Principles and practice in area-wide integrated pest management. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005. p. 525–45.

  5. 5.

    Balestrino F, Benedict MQ, Gilles JR. A new larval tray and rack system for improved mosquito mass rearing. J Med Entomol. 2012;49:595–605.

  6. 6.

    Balestrino F, Puggioli A, Bellini R, Petric D, Gilles J. Mass production cage for Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2014;51:155–63.

  7. 7.

    Maiga H, Damiens D, Diabaté A, Dabiré R, Ouedraogo G, Lees R, et al. Largescale Anopheles arabiensis egg quantification methods for mass-rearing operations. Malar J. 2016;15:72.

  8. 8.

    FAO/IAEA. Guidelines for standardised mass rearing for Anopheles mosquitoes. 2017. Version.1.0. http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/manuals-ipc.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.

  9. 9.

    FAO/IAEA. Guidelines for routine colony maintenance of Aedes mosquito species. 2017. Version. 1.0. http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/guidelines-for-routine-colony-maintenance-of-Aedes-mosquito-species-v1.0.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2018.

  10. 10.

    Culbert NJ, Lees RS, Vreysen MJ, Darby AC, Gilles JR. Optimised conditions for handling and transport of male Anopheles arabiensis: effects of low temperature, compaction, and ventilation on male quality. Entomol Exp Appl. 2017;164:276–8.

  11. 11.

    Culbert NJ, Maiga H, Bimbilé-Somda NS, Gilles JRL, Bouyer J, Mamai W. Longevity of mass-reared, irradiated and packed male Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti under simulated environmental field conditions. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:603.

  12. 12.

    Carpenter JE, Blomefield T, Vreysen MB. A flight cylinder bioassay as a simple, effective quality control test for Cydia pomonella. J Appl Entomol. 2012;136:711–20.

  13. 13.

    Seck MT, Pababeleguem S, Bassene MD, Fall AG, Diouf TAR, Sall B, et al. Quality of sterile male tsetse after long distance transport as chilled, irradiated pupae. PLos Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004229.

  14. 14.

    Shelly TE, Edu J, Nishimoto J. Chilling and flight ability and mating competitiveness of sterile males of the Mediterranean fruit fly. J Appl Entomol. 2013;137:11–8.

  15. 15.

    Balestrino F, Puggioli A, Carrieri M, Bouyer J, Bellini R. Quality control methods for Aedes albopictus sterile male production. PLos Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005881.

  16. 16.

    Culbert NJ, Balestrino F, Dor A, Herranz GS, Yamada H, Wallner T, Bouyer J. A rapid quality control test to foster the development of genetic control in mosquitoes. Sci Rep. 2018;8:16179.

  17. 17.

    Damiens D, Benedict M, Wille M, Gilles J. An inexpensive and effective larval diet for Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae): eat like a horse, a bird or a fish? J Med Entomol. 2012;49:1001–11.

  18. 18.

    Soma D, Maïga H, Mamai W, Bimbile-Somda N, Venter N, Ali A, et al. Does mosquito mass-rearing produce an inferior mosquito? Malar J. 2017;16:357.

  19. 19.

    Charlwood JD, Jones MDR. Mating behaviour in the mosquito, Anopheles gambiae s.l. I. Close range and contact behaviour. Physiol Entomol. 1979;4:111–20.

  20. 20.

    MR4 Staff 2007. Separating larvae and pupae. In: Methods in Anopheles research. 1st ed. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007.

  21. 21.

    Downes JA. The swarming and mating flight of Diptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 1968;14:271–98.

  22. 22.

    Bimbilé Somda NS, Poda BS, Sawadogo PS, Gnankiné O, Maiga H, Fournet F, et al. Ecology of reproduction of Anopheles arabiensis in an urban area of Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso (West Africa): monthly swarming and mating frequency and their relation to environmental factors. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0205966.

  23. 23.

    Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Berlin: Springer; 2003.

  24. 24.

    Hurvich CM, Tsai CL. Model selection for extended quasi-likelihood models in small samples. Biometrics. 1995;51:1077–84.

  25. 25.

    Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4:133–42.

  26. 26.

    Johnson P. Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth’s R2 GLMM to random slopes models. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014;5:944–6.

  27. 27.

    Dame DA, Curtis CF, Benedict MQ, Robinson AS, Knols BGJ. Historical applications of induced sterilisation in field populations of mosquitoes. Malar J. 2009;8:S2.

  28. 28.

    Helinski MEH, Knols BGJ. Mating competitiveness of male Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes irradiated with a partially or fully sterilizing dose in small and large laboratory cages. J Med Entomol. 2008;45:698–705.

  29. 29.

    Chung HN, Rodriguez SD, Gonzales KK, Vulcan J, Cordova JJ, Mitra S, et al. Toward implementation of mosquito sterile insect technique: the effect of storage conditions on survival of male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) muring transport. J Insect Sci. 2018;18:2.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Danilo Carvalho for his help during pupal irradiation.

Funding

This work was funded by the joint Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United Nations/International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. The authors are grateful to the University of Liverpool who covered the tuition fees of N.C. under a bursary scheme.

Author information

NJC and JB conducted initial experiments using Aedes flight test device and conceived final design for Anopheles arabiensis. NJC, SC and TW assembled flight test devices. NJC, NSBS, MH, MW, HY and JB contributed to the design of the study. NJC and MH performed the irradiation. NJC, NSBS, DDS, SC, MH and MW conducted all rearing and executed the experiments. JB supervised the research and analysed the data. NJC and NSBS wrote the manuscript which was critically revised by DDS, SC, TW, MH, MW, HY and JB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Nicole J. Culbert.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1. Compaction experiments raw data.

Additional file 2. Irradiation experiments raw data.

Additional file 3. Temperature experiments raw data.

Additional file 4. Additional tables.

Additional file 5: Fig. S1. The survival rates of male Anopheles arabiensis subject to various chilling temperatures for a period of 15 days. Significant differences between the control group (no chilling—25 °C) and treatment groups (10, 8, 4 and 0 °C) are represented as follows (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). Individual values of the various replicates are indicated in light grey and mean values shown as a solid line.

Additional file 6: Fig. S2. The survival rates of male Anopheles arabiensis exposed to a variety of compaction weights for a 15 day period. Significant differences between the control group (no compaction) and treatment groups (5, 15, 25 and 50 g) are represented as follows (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). Individual values of the various replicates are indicated in light grey and mean values shown as a solid line.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Culbert, N.J., Somda, N.S.B., Hamidou, M. et al. A rapid quality control test to foster the development of the sterile insect technique against Anopheles arabiensis. Malar J 19, 44 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-3125-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sterile insect technique (SIT)
  • Malaria
  • Flight ability
  • Quality control (QC)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.