Open Access

Combined chloroquine, sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine and primaquine against Plasmodium falciparum in Central Java, Indonesia

  • Edith R Lederman1, 4Email author,
  • Jason D Maguire1,
  • Iwa W Sumawinata^1,
  • Krisin Chand1,
  • Iqbal Elyazar1,
  • Lusi Estiana3,
  • Priyanto Sismadi2,
  • Michael J Bangs1 and
  • J Kevin Baird1
^Deceased
Malaria Journal20065:108

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-108

Received: 28 July 2006

Accepted: 14 November 2006

Published: 14 November 2006

Abstract

Background

Chloroquine (CQ) or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) monotherapy for Plasmodium falciparum often leads to therapeutic failure in Indonesia. Combining CQ with other drugs, like SP, may provide an affordable, available and effective option where artemisinin-combined therapies (ACT) are not licensed or are unavailable.

Methods

This study compared CQ (n = 29 subjects) versus CQ + SP (with or without primaquine; n = 88) for clinical and parasitological cure of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in the Menoreh Hills region of southern Central Java, Indonesia. Gametocyte clearance rates were measured with (n = 56 subjects) and without (n = 61) a single 45 mg dose of primaquine (PQ).

Results

After 28 days, 58% of subjects receiving CQ had cleared parasitaemia and remained aparasitaemic, compared to 94% receiving CQ combined with SP (p < 0.001). Msp-2 genotyping permitted reinfection-adjusted cure rates for CQ and CQ combined with SP, 70% and 99%, respectively (p = 0.0006).

Conclusion

Primaquine exerted no apparent affect on cure of asexual stage parasitaemia, but clearly accelerated clearance of gametocytes. CQ combined with SP was safe and well-tolerated with superior efficacy over CQ for P. falciparum parasitaemia in this study.

Background

Chloroquine (CQ) was the mainstay of antimalarial therapy from 1946 until the past decade when parasite resistance rendered it clinically ineffective in most areas of the world. Adult CQ therapy costs less than $0.20, is widely available almost anywhere in endemic areas, and has a generally good safety and tolerability profile. Resource-strapped health agencies in endemic areas struggle with the decision to abandon this drug. Alternative drugs, such as artemisinin combination therapies (ACT), carry significant limitations linked to cost, ease of compliance and safety in vulnerable populations like infants and pregnant women. Combining antimalarials of differing mechanisms of action may diminish risk of onset of parasite resistance[1], but there are many other determinants of effectiveness and the more effective the therapeutic options available, the more likely treatment will result in a favorable clinical outcome.

CQ combined with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) has been proven safe and effective in clinical trials (Table 1) and has been adopted as the primary therapy for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in several countries. Despite the slight increase in cost of using two medications (from approximately $0.10 to $0.20), CQ combined with SP was proven cost-effective [2]. In some nations, this combination is first-line therapy (e.g. Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu, Philippines, Uganda, and Ethiopia). Combining CQ and SP offers compelling advantages in places like Indonesia, principally because both drugs are licensed, widely available, familiar to providers and patients, inexpensive, relatively safe, well tolerated, and easily administered. Furthermore, CQ + SP combined therapy was recently adopted by Papua New Guinea[3] where the level of drug resistance is on par with the most drug resistant areas of Indonesia. Adoption of CQ + SP combined therapy for Plasmodium falciparum would require little more than a modification of malaria therapeutic policy and practice. In contrast, most other combined therapy options would require licensing, acquisition, socialization, and carry unfamiliar and perhaps more severe risks linked to safety or compliance. This is an especially salient problem for pregnant women and young children, for whom almost no safety data exists.
Table 1

Comparison of clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of chloroquine (CQ) + sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP)

Study Location

Year

N

CQ Efficacy

SP Efficacy

CQ + SP Efficacy

Endpoint in Days

Comparison of CQ+SP vs. CQ, CQ+SP vs. SP

Reference

Nigeria

2004

153

n/a

n/a

90%

28

n/a

[30]

Laos

2003

110

n/a

n/a

93%

42

n/a

n/a

[14]

Bangladesh

2002

133

n/a

n/a

72%

28

n/a

[18]

Eastern Uganda

2002

280

n/a

42%

60%

28

n/a

p = ns

[21]

Southern Uganda

2002

448

n/a

70%

83%

14

n/a

p < 0.001

[12]

Western Uganda

2001

141

93%

100%

100%

14

p = ns

p = ns

[13]

Southern Laos

2001

119

55%

82%

83%

14

p = 0.029

p = ns

[19]

Papua, Indonesia

1999

169

17%

79%

62%

28

p < 0.001

p = 0.047

[17]

Southwest Nigeria

1999

111

93%

n/a

96%

28

n/a

p = ns

[22]

Papua New Guinea

1998–1999

513*

n/a

n/a

95%

28

n/a

[3]

The Gambia

1995

405

n/a

90%

95%

28

n/a

p = ns

[20]

Mumbai, India

N/a

49

36%

n/a

87%

42

p < 0.026

n/a

[2]

ns = not significant

n/a = not available

* children were treated with amodiaquine + SP (303 of the 513), ** excluding children

Clinical data for CQ combined with SP is still lacking in many countries, including Indonesia, where CQ and SP-resistant P. falciparum is prevalent [46]. This clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of CQ combined with SP in Central Java, a setting where 47% of P. falciparum infections are resistant to CQ and 22% resistant to SP [4]. Since single dose primaquine is mandated on Java and Bali for transmission blocking activity (only adds an additional $0.05 to the cost of therapy), a single dose of primaquine was added to evaluate its impact on parasitological cure and on post-treatment gametocytaemia.

Materials and methods

Study location

The study was conducted between July and October 2001 in Purworejo District in the Menoreh Hills near the southern coast of Central Java, a region experiencing resurgent malaria at that time. The social, economic and demographic characteristics of malaria in the region are described elsewhere [4, 7, 8]. Falciparum and vivax malaria (approximately 1:1) occurs among all ages with prevalence in high-risk areas ranging from 5% to 38%. Among 40 and 54 subjects treated with CQ or SP for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in this region, 47% and 22%, respectively, developed recurrent parasitaemia within 28 days [4]. During the close study follow up, none of the treatment failures developed complicated or severe malaria.

Study subjects, screening and enrollment

Subject enrollment is depicted in Figure 1. Subjects with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were recruited, in part, by mass blood survey and by passive case detection (PCD) at local government-run clinics. This was necessary because few adults in this study area suffered from symptomatic malaria. After informed consent, all subjects were screened by medical history, physical examination, semi-quantitative glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) assay (G-6-PDH Screening Test 203-A, Sigma Diagnostics®, St. Louis, MO USA), and if female of child-bearing potential, a urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test (TestPack® +Plus™ hCG Urine, Abbott, USA). Inclusion criteria included age ≥ 15, asexual stage P. falciparum parasite density ≥ 400/μl on Giemsa thick smear examined by standard microscopy, and availability for 28-day follow-up. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, breast feeding, body weight < 40 kg, G6PD deficiency, history of antimalarial or antibiotic consumption during the previous 7 days, severe or complicated malaria, history of allergy or adverse reaction to study medications, and P. vivax or mixed species infection. Any parasitemic potential study subject not meeting these criteria was referred back to the cooperating clinic for standard therapy. Those patients deemed to meet enrollment criteria and willing to participate were assigned a sequential study subject code by the screening physician. The study subject codes were pre-assigned to treatment arms by a random process and all treatment was pre-packaged accordingly.
Figure 1

The recruitment, enrollment and randomization process for this study evaluating four treatment regimens for uncomplicated P. falciparum in residents of Purworejo District, Central Java, Indonesia.

Treatment and follow-up

Subjects were randomized to one of four treatment arms: (A) CQ 25 mg base/kg (body weight) over three days, (B) CQ 25 mg/kg over three days + SP 25/1.25 mg/kg single dose, (C) CQ 25 mg/kg over three days + SP 25/1.25 mg/kg single dose + primaquine 45 mg single dose on day 0, or (D) CQ 25 mg/kg over three days + SP 25/1.25 mg/kg single dose + primaquine 45 mg single dose on day 2. Study investigators directly observed and documented administration of each dose of medication: CQ (Resochin®; chloroquine diphosphate tablets 150 mg base; PT Bayer, Indonesia) in three once daily doses of 10, 10 and 5 mg base/kg on days 0,1, and 2 respectively; SP (Fansidar® tablets; 500 mg sulfadoxine/25 mg pyrimethamine; Hoffman La Roche, Indonesia) in a single dose on day 0; Primaquine phosphate (generic tablets, 15 mg base; PT Kimia Farma, Bandung, Indonesia) in a single dose of 3 tablets on day 0 or day 2.

Subjects were followed for 28 days after initiating therapy. Study personnel visited subjects on 10 separate days (1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18, 21 and 28) to assess symptoms, clinical recovery, adverse events and to obtain finger-stick blood samples for preparation of Giemsa-stained blood smears. Subjects complaining of illness on any day of follow-up were immediately brought to clinic and evaluated. Blood blot specimens (100 – 200 μl) were also prepared on days 0, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28 or day of recurrent parasitaemia from fingerstick blood samples collected by heparinized, 100 μl micro-capillary tubes and expelled onto Whatman No. 1 filter paper (Whatman International, United Kingdom) for drying and storage for later analysis.

Microscopy

The microscopists in this study were certified as competent by a standardized, proctored examination. Microscopists examined all ocular fields of standard Giemsa (Sigma, USA) stained thick smears at high power (1000× oil immersion) for asexual and sexual forms of P. falciparum and other plasmodial species, and recorded sexual and asexual parasite densities as number of parasites per 200 white blood cells. Parasite densities are reported as parasites/μL assuming an average white blood cell count of 8,000/μl.

Merozoite Surface Protein-2 (msp-2) genotyping

Msp-2 genotyping was performed on blood blot samples from day 0 and day of recurrent P. falciparum parasitaemia following Felger et al. [9]. Recrudescence was defined by the presence of the same genotype on day 0 and day of recurrent parasitaemia while a new infection (i.e. reinfection) was defined by the presence of a different genotype on day 0 and day of recurrent parasitaemia.

Determination of therapeutic outcomes and data analysis

Therapeutic efficacy (parasitological cure) was defined as the proportion of subjects reaching day-28 without recrudescence. Therapeutic failures occurred when asexual parasitaemia increased between day 0 and day 2, failed to clear by day 4, or recurred between days 4 and 28. These data were used to determine the crude therapeutic efficacy of each regimen. Infections initially classified as therapeutic failures but later proven to be reinfections by msp-2 genotyping were reclassified as therapeutic successes with abbreviated follow-up (until the point of censure). These results were used to determine the "adjusted" efficacies of CQ and CQ + SP. EpiInfo 2000 1.1.2 (CDC, Atlanta USA) and SPSS version 9.0 (SPSS, Inc. USA) were used to calculate confidence intervals for odds ratios (OR) and the 95% confidence interval around those ratios, and for estimating the p-value using the Yates' corrected or Fisher's exact test when appropriate. Cumulative incidence of therapeutic failure was estimated by actuarial analysis as described elsewhere [10].

Results

Enrollment

Among 124 parasitaemic persons identified during mass blood screening and passive case detection from outpatient clinics, 117 were enrolled and randomized to one of the 4 treatment regimens. Seven subjects did not meet study eligibility criteria and were returned to the referring clinic for treatment for the following reasons: taking quinine (1), pregnancy (1), G6PD deficiency (1), low body weight (2), declined participation (1) and administrative error (1).

Demographics

Among the 117 subjects enrolled and randomly assigned, no statistically significant demographic differences between the four study arms were identified; age ranged from 16 to 65 years, and the male to female ratio was 1.2:1 (Table 2). No statistically significant differences were noted between treatment arms with regards to fever rates (range 24–41%) or geometric mean asexual parasite densities (range 653-1465/μL) before enrollment.
Table 2

Demographic, clinical and parasitological characteristics of subjects treated with 4 malaria regimens in Purworejo District, Indonesia

 

Treatment group

Summary statistic

 

CQ alone

CQ + SP

CQ + SP + PQ0

CQ + SP + PQ2

 

Sample size

29

32

28

28

n/a

Male: Female

1.2 : 1

1.5 : 1

1 : 1.2

1.3 : 1

p = 0.771a

Mean age (range)

36 (17–55)

40 (20–60)

40 (20–62)

35 (16–65)

p = 0.256b

Geometric mean asexual parasite density (95% CI)

653 (382–1118)

1465 (849–2531)

1148 (582–2263)

1409 (720–2760)

p = 0.286b

Fever Rate

24%

41%

29%

36%

p = 0.529a

CQ = chloroquine, SP = sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, PQ0 = primaquine on day 0, PQ2 = primaquine on day 2, 95% CI = 95% confidence interval

n/a – not applicable

a) Chi-square test

b) Kruskal-Wallis test

Parasite and fever clearance times

There were no significant differences in parasite or fever clearance times among the 4 treatment groups. Virtually all (115 of 117) subjects cleared parasitaemia by day 3 regardless of the therapy assignment, and all 38 subjects with fever prior to therapy had a normal axillary temperature by day 2 (Figure 2).
Figure 2

(A) Asexual parasite clearance time in 117 subjects with falciparum malaria after treatment with one of 4 different regimens. (B) Time of fever clearance in 38 subjects with fever at the time of study enrollment. CQ = chloroquine, SP = sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, and PQ = primaquine on either day 0 (d0) or day 2(d2) of therapy.

Crude therapeutic efficacy of CQ vs. CQ + SP

Asexual parasitemia outcomes were similarly efficacious among the three groups receiving (CQ+SP, CQ+SP+PQ0, and CQ+SP+PQ2), so these groups were combined specifically for comparison with CQ monotherapy against asexual blood stages.

Among the 29 subjects treated with CQ alone, 1 (3%) withdrew from the study after day 18 and 3 (10%) developed intercurrent P. vivax during the second and third week of post-therapy observation. Fourteen (48%) completed the study without recurrent parasitaemia. The remaining 11 (38%) subjects developed recurrent P. falciparum during the 28-day follow-up. The crude cumulative incidence of failure of CQ therapy for uncomplicated P. falciparum was 42% (Table 3); therefore, the crude therapeutic efficacy was 58%.
Table 3

Life Table representation of cumulative incidence of crude therapeutic failure attributable to drug resistance among subjects treated with chloroquine (CQ) and CQ + sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) without distinguishing recrudescence from reinfection

CQ

CQ+SP

D

N

I

W

IR

CIF

D

N

I

W

IR

CIF

0

29

0

0

0.00

0.00

0

88

0

0

0.00

0.00

2

29

0

0

0.00

0.00

2

88

0

2

0.00

0.00

4

29

0

0

0.00

0.00

4

86

1

1

0.01

0.01

7

29

0

0

0.00

0.00

7

84

1

0

0.01

0.02

11

29

1

0

0.03

0.03

11

83

0

0

0.00

0.02

14

28

2

1

0.07

0.10

14

83

0

0

0.00

0.02

18

25

2

1

0.08

0.18

18

83

0

2

0.00

0.02

21

22

2

2

0.10

0.26

21

81

0

1

0.00

0.02

28

18

4

0

0.22

0.42

28

80

3

1

0.04

0.06

N = sample at risk of therapeutic failure at start of interval

i = the number of cases of therapeutic failure during the interval

w = the number of subjects withdrawn from the test during the interval due to exclusion from analysis, loss to follow-up after latest blood smear, intercurrent infection with another plasmodia species, or reinfection by different genotype P. falciparum or relapse/reinfection by P. vivax based on day of recurrent parasitemia CQ +DCQ concentrations

IR = risk of therapeutic failure in the interval, calculated as i/(N-w/2)

CIF = cumulative incidence of therapeutic failure, calculated as 1-[(1-IRn)(1-CIFn-1)], where IRn is the IR in the current interval and CIFn-1 is the cumulative incidence up to the previous interval

Among the 88 subjects treated with CQ + SP, six (7%) withdrew before day 28 (three declined further participation between days two and 21 and three moved away from the study site between days one and 18). One subject (1%) developed intercurrent P. vivax (day 22). Seventy-six (86%) completed the study without recurrent parasitaemia. The remaining 5 (6%) subjects developed recurrent P. falciparum during follow-up, therefore providing a crude therapeutic efficacy of 94%. The crude 28-day cumulative incidence of failure of CQ + SP therapy was 6% (Table 3). The relative risk of treatment failure with CQ compared to CQ + SP among those who completed the 28-day observation period was 7.13 (95% CI 2.74 – 18.57, p = 0.00003).

Adjusted efficacy of CQ vs. CQ + SP

Three of 11 apparent therapeutic failures among subjects receiving CQ alone could not be evaluated because P. falciparum DNA could not be amplified for msp-2 genotyping, leaving eight evaluable recurrent infections. One case of day 28 recurrent parasitaemia was reclassified as a cure with late reinfection based on differing day 0 and day of recurrence msp-2 genotypes. From the remaining seven recurrent infections, the parasite genotypes matched and their classification as recrudescence affirmed. The adjusted cumulative incidence of failure of CQ therapy for uncomplicated P. falciparum was therefore 30% (therapeutic efficacy 70%) (Table 4).
Table 4

Life Table representation of cumulative incidence of adjusted therapeutic failure attributable to drug resistance among subjects treated with chloroquine (CQ) and CQ + sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) with msp-2 genotyping to distinguish recrudescence from reinfection

CQ

CQ+SP

D

N

I

W

IR

CIF

D

N

I

W

IR

CIF

0

26

0

0

0.00

0.00

0

87

0

0

0.00

0.00

2

26

0

0

0.00

0.00

2

87

0

2

0.00

0.00

4

26

0

0

0.00

0.00

4

85

1

1

0.01

0.01

7

26

0

0

0.00

0.00

7

83

0

0

0.00

0.01

11

26

1

0

0.04

0.04

11

83

0

0

0.00

0.01

14

25

1

1

0.04

0.08

14

83

0

0

0.00

0.01

18

23

1

1

0.04

0.12

18

83

0

2

0.00

0.01

21

21

1

2

0.05

0.16

21

81

0

1

0.00

0.01

28

18

3

0

0.17

0.30

28

80

0

2

0.00

0.01

N = sample at risk of therapeutic failure at start of interval

i = the number of cases of therapeutic failure during the interval

w = the number of subjects withdrawn from the test during the interval due to exclusion from analysis, loss to follow-up after latest blood smear, intercurrent infection with another plasmodia species, or reinfection by different genotype P. falciparum or relapse/reinfection by P. vivax based on day of recurrent parasitemia CQ +DCQ concentrations

IR = risk of therapeutic failure in the interval, calculated as i/(N-w/2)

CIF = cumulative incidence of therapeutic failure, calculated as 1-[(1-IRn)(1-CIFn-1)], where IRn is the IR in the current interval and CIFn-1 is the cumulative incidence up to the previous interval

In the combined CQ + SP groups, one of five recurrent parasitaemias was excluded from analysis because parasite DNA could not be amplified, leaving four evaluable recurrent infections. Based on discordant day 0 and day of recurrence msp-2 genotypes, three apparent therapeutic failures were reclassified as successful cures with reinfection. The 28-day cumulative incidence of failure of CQ+SP therapy for uncomplicated P. falciparum was therefore only 1% (therapeutic efficacy = 99%) (Table 4). Subjects treated with CQ alone were 25 times more likely to suffer therapeutic failure compared to CQ combined with SP (95% CI 3.3 – 196.06; p = 0.0006).

Effect of primaquine on gametocytaemia

Figure 3 illustrates the course of gametocyte rates among groups after treatment. Comparing the two groups receiving primaquine, gametocyte rates declined steadily to 0% by day 11 after therapy and did not reappear during follow-up. Gametocyte rates declined more slowly in the non-primaquine groups. The difference in gametocyte clearance rates on day 11 between groups receiving primaquine (0%) and those not (33%) was significant (p = 0.025). A single dose of primaquine greatly improved the clearance rate of gametocytes, and administering the dose on day 2 vice day 0 accelerated clearance time (0% vs. 7% on day 7); however this difference was not statistically significant.
Figure 3

Gametocyte rates in 117 subjects with falciparum malaria after treatment with one of 4 different regimens. CQ = chloroquine, SP = sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, and PQ = primaquine on either day 0 (d0) or day 2(d2) of therapy.

Conclusion

The combination of CQ+SP proved 99% effective among 87 subjects with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Central Java, Indonesia. Similarly excellent efficacy has been reported from other regions [2, 1114], including Papua New Guinea[3]. However, in eastern Indonesia, where resistance to CQ (up to 95%)[5] and SP (range 15–54%) [15, 16] is much more prevalent than in Central Java, the combination of CQ + SP fails in 38%[17] to 55% (Maguire, personal communication) of subjects with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Poor efficacy of CQ+SP has been reported elsewhere as well [18] and studies in The Gambia, Uganda, Laos and Nigeria, for example, showed similarly poor efficacy or negligible difference with combining CQ and SP [13, 1922]. The apparent wide range of efficacy of CQ+SP requires information-based decisions about its use as a therapeutic option in any given area.

Despite the marked differences between day-28 cure rates, CQ vs. CQ+SP regimens had essentially identical parasite and fever clearance times. These two indices parallel clinical recovery and almost certainly exacerbate the persistent over-the-counter marketing and unsupervised use of CQ monotherapy. Indeed, surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices in the region of study[23] affirmed this practice as common. Moreover, CQ remains first-line therapy against vivax malaria, even though accurate diagnostic services to distinguish these species are available to relatively few people. For all of these reasons, CQ remains a widely used drug against P. falciparum and other species of malaria in Indonesia.

CQ+SP can not be suggested as a first-line treatment policy that would be supported by comprehensive national programs of patient awareness, health provider training, and widespread distribution and marketing. The efficacy of the combination may not be sufficiently long-lived to support these costly adjustments and measures. However, CQ combined with SP may be a feasible therapeutic option in regions with evidence of treatment efficacy where health care providers are unable to use ACT because of problems with availability, fear of side effects or counterfeit drug. Use should be limited to areas like Central Java, where data suggests that CQ+SP efficacy was better than 95%.

Primaquine has proven gametocytocidal activity against P. falciparum. A single 45 mg dose reduces gametocyte clearance time to 2 to 3 days [24], nearly one week faster than with other asexual stage antimalarials alone [25]. The addition of primaquine to standard blood schizonticidal therapy significantly reduced the point prevalence of malaria in one study [26]. Various primaquine regimens appear equally efficacious[27]; however, its use may be limited by the frequency of G-6-PD deficiency and sporadic supplies[28, 29]. In our study, addition of a single 45 mg dose of primaquine on either day 0 or day 2 significantly offset the persistence of gametocytaemia. Current P. falciparum malaria treatment policy in Indonesia includes administration of 45 mg of primaquine on day 0 of treatment in hypoendemic areas. This study supports its continued use in Indonesia, especially with combination regimens containing SP, which has been linked to sulfonamide-associated gametocyte proliferation [17]. Combining artesunate with SP similarly reduced gametocyte rates below that observed with SP alone in one study in Indonesia[15]; similarly, artesunate combined with amodiaquine significantly reduced gametocyte carriage in comparison to CQ+SP in Nigerian children[30].

In summary CQ+SP combination was highly effective for parasitological cure in subjects with uncomplicated P. falciparum in Central Java, Indonesia. The regimen was safe and efficacious, and it is inexpensive and readily available throughout Indonesia. A single dose of 45 mg primaquine, either on day 0 or day 2, suppressed or quickly eliminated gametocytaemia. Given wide regional differences in efficacy of CQ+SP, this regimen should be evaluated where its use is advocated as a therapeutic option for falciparum malaria.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Budhi Leksana, Sofyan Masbar, Awalludin Sutamihardja and Ika Susanti for their excellent technical assistance. We would also like to express our appreciation to Dr. M. Sururi of the District Health Office, Purworejo, Central Java and The Indonesian National Institutes of Health Research and Development (LITBANGKES) for their kind support of this project.

The assertions herein are the views of the authors and do not reflect official policy of the U.S. Department of the Navy, the U.S. Department of Defense, or the U.S. government.

Assurance statement: All work was performed in accordance with code 32 of Federal Regulations Part 219 (Protection of Human Subjects), U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Navy (SECNAVINST 3900.39C), and Indonesian Ministry of Health guidelines for the conduct of studies involving human subjects. The research protocol and informed consent processes were reviewed and approved by convening institutional review boards prior to initiating the research. Written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects prior to participation.

Commercial conflicts of interest: None

Sources of financial support: United States Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance (GEIS) Program under work unit ORA LCN # D0016.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No.2
(2)
LITBANGKES (National Institutes of Health Research and Development)
(3)
District Health Office
(4)
Poxvirus Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

References

  1. White NJ: Preventing antimalarial drug resistance through combinations. Drug Resist Updat. 1998, 1: 3-9. 10.1016/S1368-7646(98)80208-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gogtay NJ, Desai S, Kadam VS, Kamtekar KD, Dalvi SS, Kshirsagar NA: A randomized, parallel-group study in Mumbai (Bombay), comparing chloroquine with chloroquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in the treatment of adults with acute, uncomplicated, Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2000, 94: 309-312. 10.1080/00034980050034545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jayatilaka KDP, Taviri J, Kemiki A, Hwaihwanje I, Bulungol P: Therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine or amodiaquine in combination with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Papua New Guinea. PNG Med J. 2003, 46: 125-134.Google Scholar
  4. Maguire JD, Lacy MD, Sururi , Sismadi P, Krisin , Wiady I, Laksana B, Bangs MJ, Masbar S, Susanti I, Basuki W, Barcus MJ, Marwoto H, Edstein MD, Tjokrosonto S, Baird JK: Chloroquine or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the treatment of uncomplicated, Plasmodium falciparum during an epidemic in Central Java, Indonesia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002, 96: 655-668. 10.1179/000349802125002310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sumawinata IW, Bernadeta , Leksana B, Sutamihardja A, Purnomo , Subianto B, Sekartuti , Fryauff DJ, Baird JK: very high risk of therapeutic failure with chloroquine for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax malaria in Indonesian Papua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 416-420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rumans LW, Dennis DT, Atmosoedjono S: Fansidar resistant falciparum malaria in Indonesia. Lancet. 1979, 2: 580-581. 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)91633-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barcus MJ, Laihad F, Sururi M, Sismadi P, Marwoto H, Bangs MJ, Baird JK: Epidemic malaria in the Menoreh Hills of Central Java. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 66: 287-292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baird JK, Sismadi P, Masbar S, Ramzan A, Purnomo BW, Sekartuti , Tjitra E, Rumoko BW, Arbani PR: A focus of endemic malaria in central Java. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996, 54: 98-104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Felger I, Tavul L, Beck HP: Plasmodium falciparum: a rapid technique for genotyping the merozoite surface protein 2. Exp Parasitol. 1993, 77: 372-375. 10.1006/expr.1993.1094.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Baird JK, Wiady I, Fryauff DJ, Sutanihardja MA, Leksana B, Widjaya H, Kysdarmanto , Subianto B: In vivo resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum at Nabire, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997, 56: 627-631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bustos DG, Lazaro JE, Gay F, Pottier A, Laracas CJ, Traore B, Diquet B: Pharmacokinetics of sequential and simultaneous treatment with the combination chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Philippines. Trop Med Int Health. 2002, 7: 584-591. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00899.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gasasira AF, Dorsey G, Nzarubara B, Staedke SG, Nassali A, Rosenthal PJ, Kamya MR: Comparative efficacy of aminoquinoline-antifolate combinations for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Kampala, Uganda. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68: 127-132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ndyomugyenyi R, Mangnussen P, Clarke S: The efficacy of chloroquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and a combination of both for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in an area of low transmission in western Uganda. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 47-52. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01167.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayxay M, Khanthavong M, Lindegardh N, Keola S, Barends M, Pongvongsa T, Yapom R, Annerberg A, Phompida S, Phetsouvanh R, White NJ, Newton PA: Randomized comparison of chloroquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine versus artesunate versus artesunate plus melfoquine versus artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in the Lao People's Democratic Republic. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 39: 1139-1147. 10.1086/424512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tjitra E, Suprianto S, Currie BJ, Morris PS, Saunders JR, Anstey NM: Therapy of uncomplicated falciparum malaria: a randomized trial comparing artesunate plus sulafdoxine-pyrimethamine alone in Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 65: 309-317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Baird JK, Basri H, Jones TR, Purnomo , Bangs MJ, Ritonga A: Resistance to antimalarials by Plasmodium falciparum in Arso PIR, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991, 44: 640-644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tjitra E, Suprianto S, Anstey NM: Higher gametocyte prevalence following failure of treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and the combination of chloroquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine: implications for progression of anti-folate resistance. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 96: 434-437. 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90385-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rahman M, Rahman R, Bangali M, Das S, Talukder MR, Ringwald P: Efficacy of combined chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Bangladesh. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 98: 438-441. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2003.10.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwobel B, Jordan S, Vanisaveth V, Phetsouvanh R, Christophel E-M, Phompida S, von Sonnenburg F, Jelinek T: Therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine plus sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine compared with monotherapy with either chloroquine or sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine in uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Laos. Trop Med Int Health. 2003, 8: 19-24. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.00977.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bojang KA, Schneider G, Forck S, Obaro SK, Jaffar S, Pinder M, Rowley J, Greenwood BM: A trial of Fansidar plus chloroquine or Fansidar alone for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Gambian children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 92: 73-76. 10.1016/S0035-9203(98)90962-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Talisuna AO, Nalunkuma-Kazibwe A, Bakyaita N, Langi P, Mutabingwa TK, Watkins WW, van Marck E, D'Alessandro U, Egwang TG: Efficacy of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine alone or comined with amodiaquine or chloroquine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ugandan children. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 222-229. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01187.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sowunmi AFF, Adedeji AA, Faladej AG, Falade CO, Akinyinkaj OO, Oduola AMJ: Comparative efficacy of chloroquine plus chlorpheniramine alone and in a sequential combination with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, for the treatment of acute, uncomplicated, falciparum malaria in children. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2000, 94 (3): 209-217. 10.1080/00034980050006375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sanjana P, Barcus M, Bangs MJ, Sahat , Elyazar I, Marwoto H, Sekartuti , Sururi M, Tjokrosonto S, Baird JK: Survey of community knowledge, attitudes and practices during a malaria epidemic in Central Java, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006,[accepted],Google Scholar
  24. Rieckmann KH, McNamara JV, Frischer H, Stockert TA, Carson PE, Powell RD: Gametocytocidal and sporontocidal effects of primaquine and of sulfadiazine with pyrimethamine in a chloroquine-resistant strain of Plasmodium falciparum. Bull WHO. 1968, 38: 625-632.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chomcharn Y, Surathin K, Bunnag D, Sucharit S, Harinsuta T: Effect of a single dose of primaquine on a Thai strain of Plasmodium falciparum. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1980, 11: 408-412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaneko A, Kamei K, Suzuki T, Ishii A, Siagian R, Panjaitan W: Gametocytocidal effect of primaquine in a chemotherapeutic malaria control trial in North Sumatra, Indonesia. SE Asian J Trop Med Pub Health. 1989, 20: 351-359.Google Scholar
  27. Bunnag D, Harinsuta T, Pinichipongse S, Suntharasamai P: Effect of primaquine on gametocytes of Plasmodium falciparum in Thailand. Lancet. 1980, 91-10.1016/S0140-6736(80)92970-0.Google Scholar
  28. Gogtay NJ, Chogle AR, Sorabjee JS, Marathe SN, Kshirsagar NA: Poor gametocytocidal activity of 45 mg primaquine in chloroquine-treated patients with acute, uncomplicated, Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mumbai (Bombay): an issue of public health importance. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1999, 93: 813-816. 10.1080/00034989957808.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopez-Antunano FJ: Is primaquine useful and safe as true exo-erythrocytic merontocidal, hypnozoitocidal and gametocidal antimalarial drug?. Salud Publica de Mexico. 1999, 41: 410-419.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sowunmi A, Fehintola FA, Adedeji AA, Gbotosho GO, Tambo E, Fateye BA, Happi TC, Oduola AMJ: Open randomized study of artesunate-amodiaquine vs. chloroquine-pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Nigerian children. Trop Med Int Health. 2005, 10: 1161-1170. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01503.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lederman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement