Skip to main content
Download PDF

A pilot randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two 14-day primaquine regimens for the radical cure of vivax malaria in South India

Malaria Journal volume 17, Article number: 321 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria requires treatment with a blood schizonticide and a hypnozoitocide (primaquine) to eradicate the dormant liver stages. There has been uncertainty about the operational effectiveness and optimum dosing of the currently recommended 14-day primaquine (PQ) course.

Methods

A two centre, randomized, open-label, two arm study was conducted in South India. Patients were randomized to receive either high dose (0.5 mg base/kg body weight) or conventional dose (0.25 mg/kg) PQ for 14 days. Plasma concentrations of PQ and carboxyprimaquine (CPQ) on the 7th day of treatment were measured by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography. Study subjects were followed up for 6 months. Recurrent infections were genotyped using capillary fragment length polymorphism of two PCR-amplified microsatellite markers (MS07 and MS 10).

Results

Fifty patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics and laboratory features did not differ significantly between the groups. Mean age of the study population was 42 ± 16.0 years. Recurrences 80–105 days later occurred in 4 (8%) patients, two in each the groups. All recurrences had the same microsatellite genotype as that causing the index infection suggesting all were relapses. One relapse was associated with low CPQ concentrations suggesting poor adherence.

Conclusions

This small pilot trial supports the effectiveness of the currently recommended lower dose (0.25 mg/kg/day) 14 day PQ regimen for the radical cure of vivax malaria in South India.

Trial registration Clinical Trials Registry-India, CTRI/2017/03/007999. Registered 3 March 2017, http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/regtrial.php?modid=1&compid=19&EncHid=82755.86366.

Background

An estimated 2.5 billion people live in areas where Plasmodium vivax infection is endemic [1]. India, Ethiopia, Indonesia and Pakistan account for > 80% of the world’s vivax malaria [2]. Malaria remains a major public health concern in India where epidemiology varies substantially across the country [3]. Over the past decade, deployment of rapid diagnostic tests, allowing early diagnosis and treatment, and aggressive vector control measures have both helped to reduce malaria case fatality rates significantly. As mortality from falciparum malaria has declined the incidence of P. vivax in some states of India has increased. Approximately 12% of these cases occur in the urban areas [3]. Plasmodium vivax presents a substantial challenge for malaria control and elimination targets because of relapse, resulting from activation of dormant liver stages (hypnozoites) [4]. Prevention of relapse requires use of 8-aminoquinoline anti-malarials, in addition to schizontocidal treatment of the blood stage infection, with attendant risks of haemolysis in patients who have glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency [5]. Although PQ radical cure is widely recommended it is often not prescribed because G6PD testing is seldom available.

Several different factors determine the radical curative efficacy of PQ. These include the dosage administered, duration of treatment, host genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 metabolizing enzymes (notably 2D6), and parasite susceptibility [6]. Adherence to the currently recommended 14-day PQ regimens is often regarded as poor, although the evidence is conflicting [6, 7]. The Indian National Vector Borne Disease Programme (NVBDP) recommends radical cure regimen comprising 0.25 mg/kg body weight for 14 days (http://nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/National-Drug-Policy-2013.pdf) [8]. In contrast, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, recommends a higher dose regimen (0.50 mg/kg body weight for 14 days) [9]. WHO recommends the higher dose PQ regimen for areas with frequent relapse P. vivax strains such as East Asia [12]. There is, therefore, some uncertainty over the optimum dose and the effectiveness of currently recommended regimens. This prospective study compared and evaluated the effectiveness of two radical cure regimens in the treatment of vivax malaria in the South of India.

Methods

Study population

Patients with acute vivax malaria attending adult medical units at Kasturba Hospital, Manipal and Dr T M A Pai Hospital, Udupi, India were included in the study, if they met the following inclusion criteria: adults of either gender (≥ 18 years old) with P. vivax mono-infection confirmed by microscopy, fever defined as > 37.5 °C tympanic or oral temperature or a history of fever within previous 3 days, and willing to give informed consent. Pregnant and/or lactating women, and patients with G6PD deficiency or mixed infection with P. vivax and Plasmodium falciparum were excluded.

Study design

This prospective, two-centre, randomized, open-label, two-arm pilot study, enrolled patients from March to August 2017. In this pilot study, it was planned to enroll at least 25 patients in each arm.

Study setting

Patients were diagnosed with vivax malaria at Kasturba Hospital, Manipal and Dr. Pai Hospital, Udupi, tertiary and secondary care hospitals, respectively, in Udupi district of Karnataka State, India. Udupi district is located 13°32′24.43″ N latitude and 74°52′26.78″ E longitude, with typical tropical climatic conditions. The monsoon period falls June to October, with average rainfall of more than 4000 mm every year. Malaria incidence occurs throughout the year in Udupi district with peaks around June to July [10]. The mean annual parasite incidence was estimated as 2.5 per 1000 risk population during years 2012 to 2014 [11]. The catchment area of Kasturba Hospital, Manipal encompasses both the rural and urban population of coastal and interior Karnataka, Goa and Kerala. Kasturba Hospital, Manipal and Dr Pai Hospital, Udupi, record malaria incidence across the year with over 200 malaria cases per annum, each comprising > 55% P. vivax cases.

Subject recruitment and data collection

Eligible subjects were recruited in the study after obtaining written informed consent. A structured proforma was used to collect data. Data regarding history of fever, headache, vomiting, and past history of malaria, as well as patient’s nutritional status, socio-demographic information and general information on diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and HIV were collected. Laboratory investigations included haemoglobin, haematocrit, platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, G6PD levels, urea, creatinine) and schizonticidal treatment [whether chloroquine (CQ) or artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT)], hypnozoitocidal drug- PQ regimen along with its initiation date. Cases were classified into severe and non-severe cases as per WHO severity criteria [12]. The subjects’ follow-up details were also documented, and all the collected data were double-entered using an electronic clinical record form (SPSS 15).

Subject allocation and intervention

After completion of treatment of acute malaria with a schizonticidal drug [either chloroquine 25 mg base/kg or ACT (astesunate with doxycycline OR artemether-lumefantrine) as per the treating clinician’s judgement of severity], patients were randomized into the study. A block randomization was used to allocate subjects to the groups. Five blocks of size 10 were used. The randomization sequence within each block was done using a lottery method. Eligible patients were allocated to one of the following two treatment groups.

  1. 1.

    Primaquine 0.5 mg base/kg/day for 14 days (IPCA Laboratory Pvt Ltd, Mumbai).

  2. 2.

    Primaquine 0.25 mg base/kg/day for 14 days (IPCA Laboratory Pvt Ltd, Mumbai).

The subjects were advised to take the drug once a day in the morning after breakfast. Drug dosing was not observed. They were counselled about the importance of PQ for the effective cure of malaria and adherence to medication. Additionally, patients were counselled about personal protective measures against mosquito bite.

Subject follow-up

The study subjects were followed up on day 7 of PQ treatment for PQ and CPQ estimation. Patients were asked to come for blood draw, 2 h after the intake of PQ, in a fed state. Self-reported time after intake of PQ to blood collection was noted. Three ml of venous plasma was collected in EDTA vacutainer for drug estimation. Participants were questioned about compliance to study medication, and confirmed by used blister packs of PQ.

Any adverse events reported by the subject were noted. Patients were encouraged to return if ill. During the follow-up period, peripheral blood smears for parasitic forms were examined on day 28 from onset of illness, followed by a periodic examination by the end of every second month until the completion of 6 months, and if any fever episodes occurred in the follow-up period, the subjects’ blood smears were examined for parasitic forms. Treatment adherence, mosquito repellent and bed net usage, intercurrent febrile illnesses and any other possible symptoms of malaria were recorded and documented. In cases with microscopy confirmed recurrence of malaria, patients were treated with CQ/ACT as per the severity of illness followed by PQ 0.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days.

Genetic characterization of Plasmodium vivax for differentiating relapse from re-infection

During the initial recruitment, 2 ml of blood sample was collected from all study subjects in heparinized vacutainers and preserved in frozen conditions until further testing. Two ml of heparinized blood was also collected from patients diagnosed (smear positive) with recurrence of malaria. DNA was extracted from the heparinized blood specimens of patients (n = 4) collected during initial and recurrent infections of malaria. For DNA extraction, HiPurA™ Blood Genomic DNA Mini Purification kit meant for DNA isolation from fresh or frozen blood (HiMedia Laboratories, India) was used as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

Genotyping of P. vivax was performed based on sequence repeats in the microsatellites markers MS7 and MS10 using primers and the method described by Karunaweera et al. [13]. The microsatellite markers were amplified by PCR using 3 µl of extracted DNA with a PCR reaction performed in a final volume of 20 µl containing 1× PCR buffer, 2 mM of MgCl2, 200 mM of each dNTP, 0.25 mM of each primer, and 1.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). The following thermal cycling conditions were maintained: 5 min at 95 °C followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for 45 s at 95 °C, annealing for 45 s at 56 °C and 62 °C (for MS7 and MS10 markers, respectively), and elongation for 1 min at 72 °C with a final elongation for 5 min at 72 °C. Primers for markers MS7 were (6-FAM) 5′-GTATTCCCCGTCTTGTCC-3′ forward and 5′-CTTTCTCCGTTCTTATTTCT-3′ reverse; and for MS10 were (NED) 5′-AAGTGTATTTTCCCGACG-3′ forward and 5′-CTTTTGCTTGCTCCGTTT-3′ reverse, respectively selected from a set of highly polymorphic markers with high heterozygosity in the Sri Lankan endemic populations with vivax malaria [13]. The core repeat sequences of the MS7 marker was (GAA)9 and that of the MS10 marker was GAA(GGA)2 AGA(GGA)9AGA(GGA)4AGAGGAAGA(GGA)3AGAGGAAGA(GGAAAA)4(GGA)2(AGA)11(GGA)3(AGA)2GGAAGA(GGA)2 with size ranges of amplicons 133–160 for the former and 180–306 for the latter.

PCR was performed with a Genosys PCR thermocycler (MJ Research Model PTC-200, Genosys, Provo, UT, USA). Amplification was confirmed in a 2% agarose gel and PCR products were stored at 4 °C in the dark. The product size was resolved by capillary electrophoresis in an ABI Prism 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems), using GS500 LIZ as the internal size standard and analysed by GeneMapper software (Applied Biosystems). The electropherograms were scored for peaks above a cut-off of 300 relative fluorescent units for true amplification products. Alleles were characterized by the repeat length.

Estimation of PQ and CPQ concentrations

HPLC method Quantification of the plasma PQ and CPQ levels among all the study subjects during steady state (on 7th day after the initiation of PQ) was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Median plasma PQ and CPQ levels at day 7 were compared among patients of both the groups.

Optimized chromatographic conditions

In the present study, a reversed phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) method was developed for the estimation of PQ and CPQ using quinine sulfate (QS) as an internal standard (ISTD) with wide linearity range of 150 ng/ml to 16 µg/ml. Separation of PQ, CPQ and QS was achieved on Waters® separation module 2695 by applying isocratic reverse phase mode on Gracesmart RP C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µ), using acetonitrile and 10 mM ammonium formate (0.2% triethyl amine) buffer pH adjusted to 3.0 with formic acid (30:70,% v/v) as mobile phase, at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min, and drug molecules were detected at 265 nm on Waters® dual absorbance detector 2487. The column temperature was maintained at 38 °C and auto sampler at 4 °C, retention time of QS, PQ and CPQ were observed at 4.58, 6.24 and 13.39 min, respectively. The run time was 15 min. Representative chromatogram is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chromatogram for quinine sulfate, primaquine and carboxyprimaquine

Full size image

Optimized liquid–liquid extraction technique

To 180 µl of human plasma, 20 µl of 10 µg/ml QS solution and 20 µl of working stock of PQ and CPQ were added and vortexed for 2 min. One-thousand micro litre of tertbutyl-methyl-ether and dichloromethane (2:1,  % v/v) were added and vortexed for 10 min for extraction of drug molecules to organic phase. Samples were centrifuged at 10,000 RPM for 15 min at 4 °C using cooling centrifuge to separate proteins from the organic phase. The resulted supernatant was collected and evaporated to dryness using nitrogen for 10 min at 40 °C under 10 kpa pressure. Finally, the dried residue was reconstituted in 100 µl of methanol, and vortexed for 1 min. This solution was transferred to total recovery vial and 40 µl of solution was injected into HPLC for analysis [14].

Ethics statement

The ethics committee of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, (MUEC/021/2016-17) Manipal, India approved the study protocol. A signed written informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to enrolment. If the study subject was illiterate, an impartial third party witnessed the informed consent process. All subjects were informed the nature of the trial and that they were free to withdraw consent to participate at any time. The investigators and study personnel ensured confidentiality of all records.

Data analysis

Frequency and percentage was used for categorical variable, mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range was used to analyse continuous variable. Chi square test used to test association between two categorical variables. Independent sample t test was used to compare means across two groups; Mann–Whitney test was used to compare median across two groups. Data analysis was carried-out by SPSS version 15.

Results

During the recruitment period, 119 individuals were diagnosed with P. vivax by microscopy at the two study hospitals (Fig. 2). The main reason for not including patients was if they were unwilling to complete the lengthy follow up (57, 47.9%). Fifty participants were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to one of the two study arms, of whom 30 (60%) were available for the day 7 follow up for PQ and CPQ estimation A total of 38 participants completed 6 months’ follow-up. Only one protocol deviation occurred in which the participant reported 5 h late for the day 7 follow up drug concentration estimation. The study cohort included 45 (90%) male and 5 (10%) female participants. The mean (± SD) age of cohort was 42.0 (± 16.0) years, which ranged from 18 to 76 years. The baseline characteristics and laboratory features of the patients were similar among the treatment groups (Tables 1, 2). Half of the low dose PQ regimen subjects had a chronic disease, although this was not statistically significant.

Fig. 2
figure 2

CONSORT flow diagram

Full size image
Table 1 Demographic characteristics and outcomes of two groups
Full size table
Table 2 Clinical and laboratory features of two groups
Full size table

One patient in each treatment arm had severe malaria. Both regimens were well tolerated. Adherence to the prescribed regimen was complete in 30 (60%) who were available for the day 7 follow up. No significant drug related adverse effects were noted among either study cohort.

In the current study, a sensitive, precise, accurate, reproducible and economic RP-HPLC was developed. QS was selected as the internal standard owing to its structural similarity and comparable pKa with PQ and CPQ. This optimized chromatographic method was validated as per US FDA bioanalytical method validation guidelines. Overall precision and accuracy were found to be well within the acceptance range (i.e., 85–115%) and lower limit of quantification was found to be 150 ng/ml. Extraction efficiency of the optimized method was found to be 75–91%. Stability of PQ and CPQ in plasma was performed by conducting long-term stability studies for 30 days, where degradation was found to be less than 2.0%. The optimized method was also validated for carry-over effect, system suitability, specificity, and sensitivity.

The plasma concentrations of PQ and CPQ has been depicted in Fig. 3. Median concentrations of PQ and CPQ on day 7 were not significantly different amongst the two groups (Table 2). The patient who was sampled after 5 h for the 7th day blood sample was excluded from the analysis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Plasma concentrations of primaquine and carboxyprimaquine. Scatter plot depicting the plasma concentration of PQ and CPQ plotted against time since PQ intake. Red circle indicates subjects prescribed with 0.5 mg/kg/day of PQ. Green circle indicates subjects prescribed with 0.25 mg/kg/day of PQ. There are two people with extreme observations on PQ and CPQ concentration. Their respective values are 6.5 µg/ml and 25.95 µg/ml

Full size image

Recurrence

Recurrent infections occurred in 4 [8%] patients included in the present study, 2 patients in each arm. (Tables 1, 3). All presented with uncomplicated malaria. The intervals from starting the initial treatment to recurrence ranged from 80 to 105 days. Survival analysis with time to recurrence among the two regimens has been depicted in Fig. 4.

Table 3 Clinical characteristics, drug concentrations and genotyping of Plasmodium vivax among patients with recurrences
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Kaplan Meir survival curve of time to recurrence across two groups

Full size image

Genotyping of Plasmodium vivax to differentiate relapse from re-infection

Genotyping suggested all four recurrences were homologous (isogenic) relapses. All four primary infections were of a single genotype and were different on microsatellite typing, but all four recurrences had the same alleles as the primary infections. Results of the capillary fragment length analysis of the MS7 and MS10 microsatellite markers from patients with recurrent malaria are depicted in Fig. 5 and Table 3. All were treated with CQ followed by PQ of 0.5 mg/kg for 14 day. Characteristics of patients with relapses are in Table 3.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Four panels (P1 to P4) showing the results of fragment length of Plasmodium vivax DNA microsatellite markers MS7 and MS10 from capillary electrophoresis after polymerase chain reaction with fluorescent labelled (6-Fam and Ned) primers, from the four cases studied. Top row of each panel represents samples collected at initial infection and the bottom row at the time of reporting relapse of the disease

Full size image

Discussion

This pilot study assessed the tolerability, safety and effectiveness of two radical cure PQ dosage regimens (0.25 mg/kg/day, 0.5 mg/kg/day up to 14 days). Both proved very effective. PQ is readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, undergoes high first pass metabolism and is extensively distributed into body tissues. The plasma concentration peaks within 1–3 h after ingestion. PQ has a plasma elimination half-life of 4–9 h in healthy adults [15]. The metabolism of PQ is complex. A large number of metabolites have been identified. There are two main pathways, one via CYP450 2D6 and other CYP enzymes to reactive intermediates which are thought to mediate antimalarial activity and also haemolytic toxicity, and the other (via monoamine oxidase) to the biologically inert CPQ. CPQ is much more slowly eliminated than the parent compound with an elimination half-life of 22–30 h in healthy adults and so it is a potentially useful measure of adherence [16].

The present cohort consisted predominantly males; the gender imbalance is typical of patient population in the study setting and that of many others in malaria endemic areas of Asia [10, 17,18,19]. Although radical curative efficacy of observed PQ is usually over 90%, it is widely thought that adherence is poor to the 14 day regimens currently recommended. This small pilot study indicates that with appropriate explanation to the patients the effectiveness is good—in this series ~ 89%. It is highly likely that the four recurrences resulted from relapses as each pair of acute and recurrent isolates had the same microsatellite genotype but each differed from the other [20, 21]. Of the three relapses which had drug level measurement, one had very low day 7 CPQ concentrations strongly suggesting that the subsequent relapse resulted from poor adherence. One patient with relapse had high concentration of PQ during the index episode as well as during the recurrence, which may be suggestive of poor metabolizer phenotype. The prevalence of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers in this area is not known, but even if this is low, this small study suggests good PQ susceptibility. There was no difference between the high and low dose regimens of PQ in therapeutic effectiveness supporting previous studies from the Indian sub-continent and South America [7, 22,23,24]. A total dose of 3.5 mg base/kg seems sufficient for maximum hypnozoitocidal effects outside East Asia and Oceania. Plasmodium vivax cases recorded at health facilities during the non-transmission season likely arise from reactivation of dormant liver-stages. In the transmission season P. vivax cases are presumed to be arising both from new mosquito infections and relaps. [25]. The interval to relapse ranged between 80 and 105 days in this study which is longer than usual in East Asia, but is consistent with some studies from India which suggest an intermediate duration of latency [26,27,28].

This was a small study, and one-third of recruited patients did not complete the full 6 months follow up. This comparison was, therefore, underpowered to show significant differences between the two treatment arms. Nevertheless the effectiveness results do support the current dosing recommendation of PQ 3.5 mg base/kg total dose radical cure regimen in South India.

Conclusion

The recurrence rate of vivax malaria in this study was 8% at 6 months follow-up and it occurred equally in high dose as well as low dose PQ regimens. Recurrence cases were of non-severe phenotype and genotyping suggested all four recurrences were homologous (isogenic) relapses. This small pilot trial supports the effectiveness of the currently recommended lower dose (0.25 mg/kg/day) 14 day PQ regimen for the radical cure of vivax malaria in South India.

Abbreviations

PQ:

primaquine

CPQ:

carboxyprimaquine

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

WHO:

World Health Organization

CQ:

chloroquine

ACT:

artemisinin-based combination therapy

HPLC:

high-performance liquid chromatography

QS:

quinine sulfate

ISTD:

internal standard

RP-HPLC:

reversed phase-high-performance liquid chromatography

IQR:

interquartile range

MS:

microsatellite

USFDA:

United States Food and Drug Administration

References

  1. Mendis K, Sina BJ, Marchesini P, Carter R. The neglected burden of Plasmodium vivax malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;64:97–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. World Malaria Report 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. WHO/HTM/GMP/2008.1.

  3. Anvikar AR, Shah N, Dhariwal AC, Sonal GS, Pradhan MM, Ghosh SK, et al. Epidemiology of Plasmodium vivax malaria in India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95(Suppl 6):108–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. The malERA Refresh Consultative Panel on Tools for Malaria Elimination. malERA: An updated research agenda for diagnostics, drugs, vaccines, and vector control in malaria elimination and eradication. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002455.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Recht J, Ashley EA, White NJ. Use of primaquine and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency testing: divergent policies and practices in malaria endemic countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rishikesh K, Saravu K. Primaquine treatment and relapse in Plasmodium vivax malaria. Pathog Glob Health. 2016;110:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Durand S, Cabezas C, Lescano AG, Galvez M, Gutierrez S, Arrospide N, et al. Efficacy of three different regimens of primaquine for the prevention of relapses of Plasmodium vivax malaria in the Amazon Basin of Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91:18–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Directorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, MOHFW I. National Drug Policy on Malaria 2013. http://nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/National-Drug-Policy-2013.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2018.

  9. CDC. Guidelines for treatment of malaria in the United States. Treatment table update, May. 2013. http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/bugdrug/antibiotic_manual/cdcmalariarx2013.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2018.

  10. Saravu K, Kumar R, Ashok H, Kundapura P, Kamath V, Kamath A, et al. Therapeutic assessment of chloroquine-primaquine combined regimen in adult cohort of Plasmodium vivax malaria from primary care centres in southwestern India. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157666.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar R, Guddattu V, Saravu K. Therapeutic assessment of primaquine for radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria at primary and tertiary care centres in Southwestern India. Korean J Parasitol. 2016;54:733–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. WHO. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/162441/9789241549127_eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 25 Aug 2018.

  13. Karunaweera ND, Ferreira MU, Hartl DL, Wirth DF. Fourteen polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers for the human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7:172–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Parkhurst GW, Nora MV, Thomas RW, Carson PE. High-performance liquid chromatographic-ultraviolet determination of primaquine and its metabolites in human plasma and urine. J Pharm Sci. 1984;73:1329–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mihaly GW, Ward SA, Edwards G, Orme ML, Breckenridge AM. Pharmacokinetics of primaquine in man: identification of the carboxylic acid derivative as a major plasma metabolite. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;17:441–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Database; CID = 4908, Primaquine, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/4908. Accessed 25 Aug 2018.

  17. Saravu K, Rishikesh K, Kamath A, Shastry AB. Severity in Plasmodium vivax malaria claiming global vigilance and exploration—a tertiary care centre-based cohort study. Malar J. 2014;13:304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Saravu K, Kumar R, Ashok H, Kundapura P, Kamath V, Kamath A, et al. Therapeutic assessment of chloroquine-primaquine combined regimen in adult cohort of Plasmodium vivax malaria from primary care centres in southwestern India. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar R, Saravu K. Severe vivax malaria: a prospective exploration at a tertiary healthcare centre in southwestern India. Pathog Glob Health. 2017;111:148–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bright AT, Manary MJ, Tewhey R, Arango EM, Wang T, Schork NJ, et al. A high resolution case study of a patient with recurrent Plasmodium vivax infections shows that relapses were caused by meiotic siblings. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2882.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Koepfli C, Mueller I. Malaria epidemiology at the clone level. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33:974–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Valdes A, Epelboin L, Mosnier E, Walter G, Vesin G, Abboud P, et al. Primaquine 30 mg/day versus 15 mg/day during 14 days for the prevention of Plasmodium vivax relapses in adults in French Guiana: a historical comparison. Malar J. 2018;17:237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Adak T, Sharma VP, Orlov VS. Studies on the Plasmodium vivax relapse pattern in Delhi, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59:175–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Srivastava HC, Sharma SK, Bhatt RM, Sharma VP. Studies on Plasmodium vivax relapse pattern in Kheda district, Gujarat. Indian J Malariol. 1996;33:173–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Golassa L, White MT. Population-level estimates of the proportion of Plasmodium vivax blood-stage infections attributable to relapses among febrile patients attending Adama Malaria Diagnostic Centre, East Shoa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Malar J. 2017;16:301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chu CS, Phyo AP, Lwin KM, Win HH, San T, Aung AA, et al. Comparison of the cumulative efficacy and safety of chloroquine, artesunate, and chloroquine–primaquine in Plasmodium vivax malaria. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy319.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim JR, Nandy A, Maji AK, Addy M, Dondorp AM, Day NPJ, et al. Genotyping of Plasmodium vivax reveals both short and long latency relapse patterns in Kolkata. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39645.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. White NJ. Determinants of relapse periodicity in Plasmodium vivax malaria. Malar J. 2011;10:297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

Conception of the study: KS (K Saravu), CT. Participants’ recruitment, follow-up, microscopy: SK, WX, SU. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KS (K Saravu), KS, KB. Data collection: SK, WX. Validation and HPLC analysis of samples: GB, NKS, KB, JPC. Performed genotyping experiments and analysis: KS, AB, AVS. Analysis and interpretation of data: KS (K Saravu), CT, VG, SK. Participated in design KS (K saravu), VG. Drafted manuscript: KS (K Saravu), CT, SK, NKS. Critically reviewed the draft: KS (K Saravu), KS, CT, KB, JPC, KS, SU. Read and approved the final manuscript, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work: KS (K Saravu), CT, SK, WX, SU, GB, NKS, JPC, AB, AVS, VG, KS, KB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Manjunath Hande, Dr. B. A. Shastry, Dr. Mukhyaprana Prabhu, Dr. Shubha Sheshadri, Dr. Rama Bhat, Dr. Raviraj Acharya, Dr. Shivashankar and Dr. Sudha Vidyasagar (Clinicians, Department of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal) who helped in participant recruitment. Authors are immensely grateful to all the participants’ of this study. This study was supported by a seed grant award from Manipal McGill Center for Infectious Diseases, MAHE, Manipal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study was commenced after obtaining ethical clearance (MUEC/021/2016-17) from Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Ethics Committee. Individuals were enrolled in the study after informed consent was obtained and all unique identifiers information were removed from study data and were stored in a secure location.

Funding

This study was supported by a seed Grant Award from Manipal McGill Center for Infectious Diseases, MAHE, Manipal (Grant No. MAC ID/SGA/2016/04).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Madhava Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Kavitha Saravu & Wilbin Xavier

  2. Manipal McGill Centre for Infectious Diseases, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhava Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Kavitha Saravu & Shrivathsa Kulavalli

  3. Department of Virus Research, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhava Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Chaitanya Tellapragada

  4. Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhava Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Gouthami Brahmarouphu, Navyasree Kola Srinivas, Jagadish Puralae Channabasavaiah & Krishnamurthy Bhat

  5. Department of Cell & Molecular Biology, School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhava Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Anzil Bava, Abdul Vahab Saadi & Kapaettu Satyamoorthy

  6. Department of Statistics, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhava Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Vasudev Guddattu

  7. Department of Medicine, Dr. TMA Pai Hospital, Udupi, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhava Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Shashikiran Umakanth

Authors
  1. Kavitha Saravu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chaitanya Tellapragada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shrivathsa Kulavalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wilbin Xavier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shashikiran Umakanth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gouthami Brahmarouphu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Navyasree Kola Srinivas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jagadish Puralae Channabasavaiah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Anzil Bava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Abdul Vahab Saadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Vasudev Guddattu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Kapaettu Satyamoorthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Krishnamurthy Bhat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavitha Saravu.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saravu, K., Tellapragada, C., Kulavalli, S. et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two 14-day primaquine regimens for the radical cure of vivax malaria in South India. Malar J 17, 321 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2472-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2472-5

Keywords

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us